Lmao, its orbiting earth just like some dinosaurs that were launched into orbit when the Chicxulub asteroid struck earth 65 million years ago. (Just a joke, i know that most of what went up, came crashing back down to earth)
I'm still impressed that someone from a relatively small channel has been able to come up with a new theory of the Titanic's final minutes, it's simply incredible, you don't deserve to have 2,8k of subscribers, you deserve much more than that.
The theory is all credited to Roy Mengot, I'm simply someone with the skills and is stubborn enough to attempt to animate his theory to share it with others. Thank you for the kind words. :)
The one thing that still amazes me is just how resilient the engines were. The stern broke free and went near vertical as it submerged (spilling all the heavy stuff out), imploded, violently corkscrewed on its way down (launching pieces of it everywhere) and finally smashed into the ocean floor, pancaking on top of itself. Despite all that, the engines remained firmly attached to their platform and survived unscatched.
Actually, the engines didn't go down completely intact. The forward section of low pressure cylinders dislodged when the keel and double bottom failed and fell out when the ship separated. The two cylinders are on the ocean floor.
I heard that if the ship was split in perfect way as an empty shell, I might have floated for a while. The engines and unbalanced weight were pulling down the stern due to weight, just like taping a rock to a stick and putting it in water. This is only theoretical and can't be proven.
@@sidharthaajithprasad1229 Titanic and the rest of the Olympic class liners each had two four cylinder triple expansion steam engines. As I said two years ago, the forward cylinders of both engines broke off and are laying on the ocean floor
What makes it confusing is the background with the stars. As we follow the bow sink to the bottom the star background remains on screen for some reason.
When I was a kid my family visited the Queen Mary in 1982. I was 9. I became totally fascinated with ocean liners and collected every book I could find. I annoyed my friends with facts and stories about ocean liners. . I wanted to become an oceanographer and find the Titanic. My name is Robert A. Ballard. I changed my career goals after 1985 and became a band teacher.
Please note, due to time constraints the Bow & Stern impact at the same time otherwise, the video would be much longer. The rate of descent is calculated at 20 knots | 37km/h | 23mph or 10.27ft per second. Discord Link: discord.gg/gcvy49h
My favorite part is where she flies off into the sky. Seriously, great video. I realize the wierdness of the ascent into the heavens has got something to do with the software used, and probably couldn't be helped. But it DOES give the opportunity to make a number of really funny bad jokes.
One thing you missed was the bow see-sawing as it went down. There was a study done on this several years ago to see how the bow behaved as it went down and they made a model of the bow and arranged weights inside to simulate the Titanic. No matter how they arranged the weights, the ship did a see-saw motion on the way to the bottom. Basically right after the bow separated from the stern and was free falling, it started doing that. James Cameron even shows it in the 2012 animation. I honestly wish I had a video of this experiment because I do remember watching it on TV.
What you say is true. Before all the business with it splitting in two some theories even suggested that it took as long as two weeks to reach the bottom, firstly because of an enormous seesaw motion and secondly because the water was so thick at such a great depth. I'm still not convinced that it broke in two on the surface as none of the eye witness accounts mention it. Obviously it was very dark but the lights continued blazing until almost the end.
@@davidhunt6463 I would've highly doubted any claims that the ship took 2 weeks to fall 12000 feet, assuming these were claimed by others, simply because of how ridiculous it sounds. Bismarck sank and reached 15000 in just 10 minutes.
The state of the wreck leaves no doubt it broke in two at the surface, as well as numerous people who survive did see it break in two. They were ignored by the two government inquires into the disaster. There is no way 50,000 tons of ship can be scattered across 15 square miles of ocean floor in two huge pieces a half mile apart with numerous large pieces scattered around and to the east of the stern without breaking up at or near the surface. The break up also explains why nobody still in the lower levels of Titanic escaped, they were all killed when it broke in two either by compartments collapsing around them or flooding. Also, once the ship went under, it rocketed to the sea floor like free falling aerial bombs, which is why the aft end of the bow and the entire stern pancaked on impact and buried themselves as much as 70 feet into the mud.
I agree with you. As long as everything is treated with great care I don't have an issue with people bringing artifacts up no matter if they are personal or not. Eventually there will be nothing left of the ship except for a huge stain on the sea floor. With the exception of belongings, there is already nothing left of the victims which is why I support recovering their personal things. Such as clothes, shoes etc. We should preserve them.
I know. It is sad, but think about it. The cold deep dark ocean is actually preserving the remains of Titanic. The wreck has been down there for a whole century and almost another decade. It will probably still be there in another 5 or 6 decades but I doubt it'll be there another century. If titanic had never sunked, she would've ended up like her sister ship, Olympic, which was scrapped and salvaged after a successful career. Or she would've been sunk during world war 1. Either way, I doubt she would have lasted as long as she has already.
"Hey Ma, if you could see me now, Arms spread wide on the starboard bow, Gonna fly this boat to the moon somehow." - from "I'm on a Boat" by the Lonely Island
You guys ACTUALLY think that didn't happen?? We all know the bow collided with the iceberg and sank while the stern collided with the moon and disintegrated in a supernova from last year
Lovely stuff - I only have two minor queries - wouldn't the boilers and some of the engine-room debris have fallen at a much faster rate, having the hydrodynamic properties of a rock, and didn't the bow see-saweas it descended, as suggested by the model testing performed in 'Titanic: Answers from the Abyss'? Really like how you incorporated the stern's 'corkscrewing descent'. This real-time descent is also chilling in how it illustrates the sheer time it took Titanic to make her long fall from the surface. Bravo!
Unfortunately due to real-world stuff, he had to cut back on the detail of this animation. Thats why the stern and other objects catch up to the bow (Which they wouldn't) I would recommend checking out the channels discord channel for some more info on this
Just came across your channel and I couldn't have subscribed fast enough. After seeing a few of your videos I have to say, your level of commitment and attention to detail is phenomenal. I can't imagine how much time and effort went into making the whole model with this software. It's very impressive, well done! Out of curiosity, how long have you been working with Blender?
Welcome to the channel! The model has underwent 3 revisions and currently undergoing its fourth for an upcoming documentary series. It first began as a side project in 2010. I taught myself how to use Blender for pretty much the sole purpose of bringing Titanic to life via animations.
@@TitanicAnimations Wow, I admire your dedication to this. Very excited for the documentary and I hope to see your channel grow because you deserve it. Thank you for the reply, hope you're having a lovely day!
The government won't tell you this but the break-up of the Titanic was actually confirmed in 1969 when the Apollo mission passed by the stern on its way to the moon.
I've watched many of these Titanic videos on RUclips. I have to say this is the first time I've seen the stern break away from the bow and eject itself into space.........
I recall some testimony about survivors who were on the boat deck talking about the ship rising strangely before the final plunge. If true, that might also indicate a less exaggerated angle.
you can actually see the deck 'rise' happening in my real time animation. It took it from Thayer's testimony specifically by "a couple feet" so the deck rises 2 ft then sinks again.
Awaiting animation of Stern portion slowly landing on the moon (slowly because of low gravity), it doesn't need to be slo-motion, since it'll be going slowly anyhow.
I always wonder why the 2 towers are never filmed and studied in hard detail like the bow or stern section. If those was studied maybe they can answer some of the answers that remain like how strong was they and where was the final point of failure for titanic to split into 4 pieces. I would love to see photos of those and have them looked at before it is to late and there is nothing left of Titanic to study.
What is this? Adobe ragdoll? Nothing in this world that weights 43,000 tons let alone a ship is going to flout out of the ocean like that no matter what the damage is!
Though we may never know what truely happened that night, this is the most realistic one I've seen yet! I can totally see this is what happened, she did still split, but maybe not how we thought like in the film
Have you seen History channel Titanic 100 years? They think the double bottom keel kept the bow hanging on for a while before letting go. Great job doing these videos!
I build ships for a living, and I can say for a fact that the main or B deck in Titanic's case holding the ship together until the last moment is quite likely. The ships I build today have main decks as strong or stronger than the bottom shell plates, which are backed up by T-beams that run the whole length of the vessel. The foundations for the engines and other heavy machinery such as reduction gears are an integral part of the bottom and keel, though there is no central keel beam like there was on Titanic. It is still a cellular structure that also doubles as fuel and ballast tanks.
I'm wondering why both halves of the ship were not crushed flatter than a pancake once they reached the ocean floor. Water pressure at that depth is insane.
This is an interesting theory. However, I am curious how this theory explains the lateral movement of the two "towers," since they did not land in between the bow and stern section, but instead landed an appreciable distance to the east of the stern. This would indicate that there was indeed enough centrifugal force generated by the spiraling stern to throw the pieces in a lateral direction, especially considering how fast the 300+ ft. stern had to be spiraling in order to create the mud patterns on the bottom when it landed. That said, great animation.
How fast (MPH) did the bow go before it hit bottom, and how many minutes, from separation to the ocean floor did it take? (Too small of a Titanic model, and too dark to see it clearly) other than that, pretty good analysis. Although no one will truly ever know how it actually descended to the bottom.
It reached a speed of at least 30mph and probably reached the sea floor in as little as five minutes. Once an object as heavy as a flooded ship goes under, it drops to the bottom like a free-falling aerial bomb.
Honestly this version of the breakup would explain why so many reported the ship going down in one piece instead of breaking in two. If it broke in two in this fashion it makes sense that only a few would notice counting on how close they were to the ship. Even some of the remaining people on board may of not even noticed.
The people aboard certainly knew she was breaking up, because there was a cacophony of noise from below decks that aside from everything not bolted down crashing forward, could only be steel plates tearing apart. Ships breaking up create deafeningly loud sounds.
I still wonder if keeping moving forward would have led to a different sinkingscenario. Would she have foundered earlier? Would it be the same? Would she rest in a different depth? So many questions so many possibilities and yet never a proper answer
Very interesting.I had heard that the ship sank intact,but broke up just below the surface.Rest in Peace to everyone who tragically lost their lives that horrible night.
@@user-tc3be1wd3f yea we haven't actually landed on the moon it's just a Disney show. And the stern? that went into the 4th dimension. Thought you enthusiasts would know that
I love how the whole stern section just silently floats away into the heavens.
🤣
YAW YEET
Why is the ship flying ?🤣
@@lullabies2645 its not.
@@BGI_guy it is. Lol
The aft part of the ship is still orbiting the earth in outer space.
Houston....we`ve got a problem.....
thats what i was thinking Lmfao
@@AspireTechYT Hey, other pony.
@@featherpony hello ^c^
Lmao, its orbiting earth just like some dinosaurs that were launched into orbit when the Chicxulub asteroid struck earth 65 million years ago. (Just a joke, i know that most of what went up, came crashing back down to earth)
I totally forgot about the aft flying off into space. It just makes so much sense!
I'm laughing so hard I'm crying now 🤣
"godamned space icebergs!" - Captain Smith, RMS Titanic, 1912
I read this as I was watching it fly away... I about lost it!!! Hahahahaha 😂
@@Blox117 Idiot
Rose, as soon as we hit outer space take a deep breath and hold it. The vacuum of space is going to suck us above.
Somewhere on the flying stern, you can hear Rose tell Jack "Look I'm flying"...lol. 🤣
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Peter pan : 🎵 you can fly, you can fly, you can fly, 🎵
I'm still impressed that someone from a relatively small channel has been able to come up with a new theory of the Titanic's final minutes, it's simply incredible, you don't deserve to have 2,8k of subscribers, you deserve much more than that.
The theory is all credited to Roy Mengot, I'm simply someone with the skills and is stubborn enough to attempt to animate his theory to share it with others. Thank you for the kind words. :)
@@TitanicAnimations Mengot was ignored for years - great job animating his genius.
@@TitanicAnimations what did you use for this animation?
@@johnprice2718 Blender 3D software to animate and render it
this isnt a new theory
Titanic: **splits in half**
Stern: "I will never let you go, bow."
The one thing that still amazes me is just how resilient the engines were. The stern broke free and went near vertical as it submerged (spilling all the heavy stuff out), imploded, violently corkscrewed on its way down (launching pieces of it everywhere) and finally smashed into the ocean floor, pancaking on top of itself. Despite all that, the engines remained firmly attached to their platform and survived unscatched.
They wouldn't have if they were assembled in Mexico.That there is proof of a fine Irish put together
Actually, the engines didn't go down completely intact. The forward section of low pressure cylinders dislodged when the keel and double bottom failed and fell out when the ship separated. The two cylinders are on the ocean floor.
I heard that if the ship was split in perfect way as an empty shell, I might have floated for a while. The engines and unbalanced weight were pulling down the stern due to weight, just like taping a rock to a stick and putting it in water. This is only theoretical and can't be proven.
I think titanic had 6 engines, two of is broken from stern
@@sidharthaajithprasad1229 Titanic and the rest of the Olympic class liners each had two four cylinder triple expansion steam engines. As I said two years ago, the forward cylinders of both engines broke off and are laying on the ocean floor
DID the Stern just fly
Camera followed the bow
It would have been funny if they added that song from E.T. called "flying" for the stern section going off into space.
You didn’t know ?!!
What makes it confusing is the background with the stars. As we follow the bow sink to the bottom the star background remains on screen for some reason.
When I was a kid my family visited the Queen Mary in 1982. I was 9. I became totally fascinated with ocean liners and collected every book I could find. I annoyed my friends with facts and stories about ocean liners. . I wanted to become an oceanographer and find the Titanic. My name is Robert A. Ballard.
I changed my career goals after 1985 and became a band teacher.
You ended up doing an important job nontheless
Ur Robert .A.Ballard
Titanic is flying! No wonder so much people die- oh wait
This just shows you we Enthusiasts will continue to study Titanic until the end of time
I'm a Titanic Enthusiast
I grew up in a time where they said the Titanic would never be found
I grew up in a time when they said that the economy is not going to fail.
@@the_rover1 That doesn't make sense since everybody knows about the Crash of 29' and you obviously aren't 90+ years old.
@@SquidProQuo80 I mean 2007 onwards.
@@the_rover1 I grew up in a time where everyone was naked.
@@mistylover7398 back in the ape days?
Please note, due to time constraints the Bow & Stern impact at the same time otherwise, the video would be much longer. The rate of descent is calculated at 20 knots | 37km/h | 23mph or 10.27ft per second.
Discord Link: discord.gg/gcvy49h
@Dre Montoya
No
The impact on the sea floor would have damaged the structure pretty badly and there's also the issues of decay over time
The Ship is LEVITATING...
Legend has it the stern is still suspended in the air to this day
And I really do believe it actually is 🙂😏
My favorite part is where she flies off into the sky.
Seriously, great video. I realize the wierdness of the ascent into the heavens has got something to do with the software used, and probably couldn't be helped. But it DOES give the opportunity to make a number of really funny bad jokes.
:)
A simple line to show the waterline would've been suffice, honestly.
"beam me up scotty" - Titanic, stern section
@@TitanicAnimations why did the stern go up instead of down?
@@khajiitfemale1556 magical
Can you do a animation wirh a closeup of the breaking area? Would be very cool.
Like your animations. Also that theory makes sense.
He did it's at the end of how titanic broke
One thing you missed was the bow see-sawing as it went down. There was a study done on this several years ago to see how the bow behaved as it went down and they made a model of the bow and arranged weights inside to simulate the Titanic. No matter how they arranged the weights, the ship did a see-saw motion on the way to the bottom. Basically right after the bow separated from the stern and was free falling, it started doing that. James Cameron even shows it in the 2012 animation. I honestly wish I had a video of this experiment because I do remember watching it on TV.
What you say is true. Before all the business with it splitting in two some theories even suggested that it took as long as two weeks to reach the bottom, firstly because of an enormous seesaw motion and secondly because the water was so thick at such a great depth.
I'm still not convinced that it broke in two on the surface as none of the eye witness accounts mention it. Obviously it was very dark but the lights continued blazing until almost the end.
@@davidhunt6463 I would've highly doubted any claims that the ship took 2 weeks to fall 12000 feet, assuming these were claimed by others, simply because of how ridiculous it sounds. Bismarck sank and reached 15000 in just 10 minutes.
The state of the wreck leaves no doubt it broke in two at the surface, as well as numerous people who survive did see it break in two. They were ignored by the two government inquires into the disaster. There is no way 50,000 tons of ship can be scattered across 15 square miles of ocean floor in two huge pieces a half mile apart with numerous large pieces scattered around and to the east of the stern without breaking up at or near the surface. The break up also explains why nobody still in the lower levels of Titanic escaped, they were all killed when it broke in two either by compartments collapsing around them or flooding. Also, once the ship went under, it rocketed to the sea floor like free falling aerial bombs, which is why the aft end of the bow and the entire stern pancaked on impact and buried themselves as much as 70 feet into the mud.
@@taraswertelecki7874 dont you mean just the bow 8n the ocean
@@taraswertelecki7874 the stern got taken by aliens, collided with the moon, and most of it disintegrated from a supernova last year
It's sad that Titanic is rotting away at the bottom of the ocean
I agree with you. As long as everything is treated with great care I don't have an issue with people bringing artifacts up no matter if they are personal or not. Eventually there will be nothing left of the ship except for a huge stain on the sea floor. With the exception of belongings, there is already nothing left of the victims which is why I support recovering their personal things. Such as clothes, shoes etc. We should preserve them.
@BFDI Pencil ?
I know. It is sad, but think about it.
The cold deep dark ocean is actually preserving the remains of Titanic. The wreck has been down there for a whole century and almost another decade. It will probably still be there in another 5 or 6 decades but I doubt it'll be there another century.
If titanic had never sunked, she would've ended up like her sister ship, Olympic, which was scrapped and salvaged after a successful career. Or she would've been sunk during world war 1. Either way, I doubt she would have lasted as long as she has already.
@@bellametallica 😒 titanic we miss you ♥
Titanic: like the wizard of oz.......IM MELTING!!!!!!!!
Titanic fans: 🪦 rip Titanic 😒😞
As someone who’s second half also floated off into space I can relate
to the stars and beyond my friend ✨🌠🌟
3:07 the back of the ship flies away team rocket style...
Titanic is blasting off again!!!!!!! * white twinkle *
Why is it flying?
To this day it still is. How it really happened and all ships do this before death everyone knows that silly.
I didn’t know the titanic could defy gravity
It really did that vary night and is still up there. Everyone knows that ships do this before death silly.
the stern is just going to space
I hope the Rapping Dog at least managed to get to safety during all this.
So grateful that i can still look up and see a full Titanic stern in the night sky.
Me 2 😆😏
🤣🤣🤣🙏🙏🤣🤣
stern portion blasting off into outer space... that's a very creative interpretation of events. This animation gets an A+ for originality.
How it really happened and still up there today
TITANIC JUST FLY OUT OF THE WATER!
All ships do this before death everyone knows that silly, it's still up there today.
Okay, I understand the break better. Can we get into how one half of the ship soared off into space now?
Aliens
@@TitanicAnimations LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
@@TitanicAnimations 🛸🛸
*we have lift off.*
Titanic: copy that.
"Hey Ma, if you could see me now,
Arms spread wide on the starboard bow,
Gonna fly this boat to the moon somehow."
- from "I'm on a Boat" by the Lonely Island
LOLMFAOXD
You know what, I believe it
I remember that one drawing that showed the stern flying! And I saw a pic of the stern flying too. This is realistic, no joke.
It amazes me how they finished with this animation, with just about zero concern for the laws of physics, and said Yep, it’s ready for RUclips.
I never knew the titanic flew into orbit before its final plunge! Thanks titanic animations for enlightening us!
😆😆 it's been up there today still
I like the contrast between the benevolent music and what's actually happening.
Stern flew off into the dark, moonless night. It can finally follow its dreams after all these years of being stuck to his evil twin, Bow.
😆😆
the bow and stern did not hit bottom at the same time
nuh uh
bro made the stern fly in the air 💀💀
Some say... the stern is still in orbit to this day...
And I really do believe it for really actually
Interesting video but why does the Stern lift off the water like it's floating into space? I'm confused by that animation.
It's still in the water but the animation focuses more on the bow rather than the stern.
You guys ACTUALLY think that didn't happen?? We all know the bow collided with the iceberg and sank while the stern collided with the moon and disintegrated in a supernova from last year
@@user-tc3be1wd3f agreed your the truth.
We finally figured out what the UFOs we've been seeing are. Biggest conspiracy ever! 😂🤣😂
lmao
Ah yes.
*The propellers are turning the ship into a helicopter*
Exactly
the stern is in the sky 3:00
If only this could happen in reality and be real.
I never knew the aft of the ship went shooting up into outer space, man the forces for that to happen must have been immense.
Lovely stuff - I only have two minor queries - wouldn't the boilers and some of the engine-room debris have fallen at a much faster rate, having the hydrodynamic properties of a rock, and didn't the bow see-saweas it descended, as suggested by the model testing performed in 'Titanic: Answers from the Abyss'?
Really like how you incorporated the stern's 'corkscrewing descent'. This real-time descent is also chilling in how it illustrates the sheer time it took Titanic to make her long fall from the surface. Bravo!
Unfortunately due to real-world stuff, he had to cut back on the detail of this animation. Thats why the stern and other objects catch up to the bow (Which they wouldn't) I would recommend checking out the channels discord channel for some more info on this
Just came across your channel and I couldn't have subscribed fast enough. After seeing a few of your videos I have to say, your level of commitment and attention to detail is phenomenal. I can't imagine how much time and effort went into making the whole model with this software. It's very impressive, well done!
Out of curiosity, how long have you been working with Blender?
Welcome to the channel! The model has underwent 3 revisions and currently undergoing its fourth for an upcoming documentary series. It first began as a side project in 2010. I taught myself how to use Blender for pretty much the sole purpose of bringing Titanic to life via animations.
@@TitanicAnimations Wow, I admire your dedication to this. Very excited for the documentary and I hope to see your channel grow because you deserve it. Thank you for the reply, hope you're having a lovely day!
Did anyone have to turn up their brightness to see what was happening
the stern isn't flying. The camera is following the bow, but the ocean and sky isn't moving for no reason.
It's mad how the back half of Titanic just fucks off into space
The government won't tell you this but the break-up of the Titanic was actually confirmed in 1969 when the Apollo mission passed by the stern on its way to the moon.
fake the camera is following the bow😐
The survivors at least got 10% off coupons for their next White Star Cruise!
Pretty sure the Titanic bending upwards during the breakup theory has been disproved, but great animation and video regardless.
Can I get sources? I want to look at all the justifications of Titanic break up theories
@@bluechair9172 All I suggest is that you look around, I remember seeing that is was disproved somewhere. Best of luck if you go looking.
the back wouldnt of caught up like that either due to it being lighter
Omg!!! New theory, salvage the stren from outer space then...i become mad ...
I hate how we get 2 adds at once now.
Just pay $10 or $11 a month for RUclips red and you'll have zero ads all the time
I've watched many of these Titanic videos on RUclips. I have to say this is the first time I've seen the stern break away from the bow and eject itself into space.........
1:39 in what sense are those highlighted sections “towers”?
I think they meant funnels. In other news, Titanic really flew up into space I guess...
Chunks of the upper decks where the No. 3 funnel, aft grand staircase and engine room ventilation shaft were that are the size of apartment buildings.
I can't believe I almost forgot that the titanic's stern flew into the sky
It's still up there today
I recall some testimony about survivors who were on the boat deck talking about the ship rising strangely before the final plunge. If true, that might also indicate a less exaggerated angle.
you can actually see the deck 'rise' happening in my real time animation. It took it from Thayer's testimony specifically by "a couple feet" so the deck rises 2 ft then sinks again.
Awaiting animation of Stern portion slowly landing on the moon (slowly because of low gravity), it doesn't need to be slo-motion, since it'll be going slowly anyhow.
I always wonder why the 2 towers are never filmed and studied in hard detail like the bow or stern section. If those was studied maybe they can answer some of the answers that remain like how strong was they and where was the final point of failure for titanic to split into 4 pieces. I would love to see photos of those and have them looked at before it is to late and there is nothing left of Titanic to study.
What is this? Adobe ragdoll? Nothing in this world that weights 43,000 tons let alone a ship is going to flout out of the ocean like that no matter what the damage is!
Thank you for that fine forensic analysis...
We should try and recover the cylinder
I'm confused, has the bow sunk and the stern flew away?or is it all flying or sinking?
Ocean plane was removed so you can see. The camera follows the bow, so it makes it seem like the stern is flying
@@TitanicAnimations but it did fly honest
"oooh the stern just floats away into the moon"
Though we may never know what truely happened that night, this is the most realistic one I've seen yet! I can totally see this is what happened, she did still split, but maybe not how we thought like in the film
Have you seen History channel Titanic 100 years? They think the double bottom keel kept the bow hanging on for a while before letting go. Great job doing these videos!
I build ships for a living, and I can say for a fact that the main or B deck in Titanic's case holding the ship together until the last moment is quite likely. The ships I build today have main decks as strong or stronger than the bottom shell plates, which are backed up by T-beams that run the whole length of the vessel. The foundations for the engines and other heavy machinery such as reduction gears are an integral part of the bottom and keel, though there is no central keel beam like there was on Titanic. It is still a cellular structure that also doubles as fuel and ballast tanks.
I'm wondering why both halves of the ship were not crushed flatter than a pancake once they reached the ocean floor. Water pressure at that depth is insane.
Whoa man so the stern was the first object to go into space? whoa..
Why is the stern flying up in the air?
Of all the "theories", l like the one on this channel and the way its shown best. Well done.
Such a sad video...well made, reflects the topic magnificently...which is why it’s so sad.
Art at its finest.
It sank... Saved 10 minutes of your life 😉
They are trying to tell us what happend at the break up and final decent we all know it sank
They went their separate ways, but they later realised they became half of what they used to be.
😆😆
This is an interesting theory. However, I am curious how this theory explains the lateral movement of the two "towers," since they did not land in between the bow and stern section, but instead landed an appreciable distance to the east of the stern. This would indicate that there was indeed enough centrifugal force generated by the spiraling stern to throw the pieces in a lateral direction, especially considering how fast the 300+ ft. stern had to be spiraling in order to create the mud patterns on the bottom when it landed. That said, great animation.
Man, the physics in this video are amazing!
Such a hounting tune .
Nice job, though maybe you could've done the captions while freezing the animation instead of here.
How fast (MPH) did the bow go before it hit bottom, and how many minutes, from separation to the ocean floor did it take?
(Too small of a Titanic model, and too dark to see it clearly) other than that, pretty good analysis. Although no one will truly ever know how it actually descended to the bottom.
It reached a speed of at least 30mph and probably reached the sea floor in as little as five minutes. Once an object as heavy as a flooded ship goes under, it drops to the bottom like a free-falling aerial bomb.
She went under the sea, to an octopus' garden in the shade, and once a year, a yellow submarine makes a stop.
Yes, but the head shark hates the color yellow.
Those loose parts went down faster than i expected. Did the bow and stern actually hit the bottom at nearly the same time?
Good question, but the heaviest pieces of the ship hit the bottom first.
Ah yes, the less popular Mengot theory, with the plot twist that the stern gets rocketed skyward after the breakup.
That’s crazy that they landed at the same time
Honestly this version of the breakup would explain why so many reported the ship going down in one piece instead of breaking in two. If it broke in two in this fashion it makes sense that only a few would notice counting on how close they were to the ship. Even some of the remaining people on board may of not even noticed.
The people aboard certainly knew she was breaking up, because there was a cacophony of noise from below decks that aside from everything not bolted down crashing forward, could only be steel plates tearing apart. Ships breaking up create deafeningly loud sounds.
the fact this is in real time when it was underwater
Whenever this video is in my recommendations, I like to revisit the comments...very uplifting.
"Uplifting"...
It's scary to think there were still hundreds of people going down with the wreck
We are here for you titanic
Hello, what is the music playing in the video please? X
Wow is it true that one of the reciprocating engine torn apart?
I still wonder if keeping moving forward would have led to a different sinkingscenario. Would she have foundered earlier? Would it be the same? Would she rest in a different depth? So many questions so many possibilities and yet never a proper answer
Very interesting.I had heard that the ship sank intact,but broke up just below the surface.Rest in Peace to everyone who tragically lost their lives that horrible night.
I'd like to see this corrected with the ocean surface clearly delineated against the hull. Overall, I'd say it's excellent.
I've studied animations like this explain the breakup, and they all seem to agree on one thing:
The ocean is very deep.
In 2:50, what prevented the Aft Tower from completely fall off from the stern?
It didn't let go. It promised.
Oh so you’re saying the stern floated off into a void...
...and this guy said Aaron1912’s theory of the V Break was wrong🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
The v-break is impossible because the stern collided with the moon for 20 years and last year it disintegrated in a supernova
@@user-tc3be1wd3f yea we haven't actually landed on the moon it's just a Disney show. And the stern? that went into the 4th dimension. Thought you enthusiasts would know that
@@candle_eatist agreed lol
Why is the stern floating up super high?
How the ocean floor shaked when the stern and bow hit the bottom?
This video is as long as it took Titanic to hit the sea floor after sinking.