MetaBreaker Devotion Muta Siege! Balance Council Recommendations in Description

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 окт 2024

Комментарии • 30

  • @zorgovenga
    @zorgovenga День назад

    Overall, the Reverent going from 3/4 to 4/5 was a really good choice from BC.

  • @fabiankunda1365
    @fabiankunda1365 2 дня назад +2

    Mutabreaker!! It waa right there :D

  • @DarkSpells87
    @DarkSpells87 2 дня назад +1

    I think everyone has put Meta Ruining Season in provision increase this month.

  • @shoestorekiddo
    @shoestorekiddo 2 дня назад +1

    What about Landschekts instead of arbalests? Muta buffs them to always trigger Inspired, and they're slightly better in a short round. Also Inspired matters for Meve

    • @shinmiri2101
      @shinmiri2101  2 дня назад +1

      They could be good alternatives. Arbalest is greedier and Landschnekts are safer.

  • @Tomciu002
    @Tomciu002 2 дня назад +9

    Temple of Melitele - disgusting card that in its first form does not rely on the player's skill at all, creates three legendary cards completely out of nothing, without any condition that the opponent may not be ready for, and as if that was not enough, it has an order that can strengthen a given card by 10(!) strength (usually a duel). In my opinion, there should be no such ability at all, and if there is, it should be nerfed to such an extent that it does not parasitize on the faction and it is possible to build decks based mainly on NR legendary cards played directly.

    • @Huhnlord
      @Huhnlord 2 дня назад +4

      There are definitely worse cards out there in my opinion. At least temple gives you a 0 Point Play, is not as good after you win a round, is one of the most expensive cards and can be as good as bad, depending on your RNG. It definitely is a really strong card that finds its place in a lot of decks, but at least every game played with Temple is different than the next.
      Personally I think cards like Calveit are worse, since it’s cheap in comparison to it’s consistency and still 7 tempo, but also make 90% of the games play exactly the same.

    • @Tomciu002
      @Tomciu002 2 дня назад +1

      @@Huhnlord I agree with issue of rng in the Temple, also mean the issue of fairness in the game. I too agree about calveit, it is also poorly designed and would require some rework, which unfortunately will not happen, because CDPR did not give us such a tool (which could be discussed for a long time because it would also be a quite extensive topic)

    • @ArchangelMJZ
      @ArchangelMJZ 2 дня назад +2

      I agree it has design flaws especially with the first form being SO much stronger than the second. However Torres does the same thing but better while playing for 15+points of tempo then Calv top decks all golds

    • @honestabe411
      @honestabe411 2 дня назад +2

      Slama demanded casino clown fiesta

    • @tejendrachettri5970
      @tejendrachettri5970 2 дня назад +6

      Jan Calveit, a card so special it literally removes a key aspect of card games which is essential for balance. For the low low price of putting some extra tactics in your deck. Henry var Attre, a card when paired with the mighty Calveit makes your round 2 hand so strong that with some semblence of brain function( and luck obviously) you could beat any deck. I could go on how each faction has broken cards, yet people are always butt hurt about temple. Yeah its broken i get it, but its not even been used by pros in the longest time in tournaments. Gwent players just hate NR i guess lmao. The faction is dead in the gutter rn.

  • @djdoggo9784
    @djdoggo9784 2 дня назад +3

    Amazing! Would you please make a good raid deck as well??❤

    • @Mr.Walrus23
      @Mr.Walrus23 2 дня назад +2

      Hell no! So bored of Warlord, I see the raids in almost 50% of my games at 2550+.

  • @norbertonicenstein5333
    @norbertonicenstein5333 2 дня назад +1

    bro, could you make a unitless skellige deck? there used to be one around that included sove and svalblood, really enjoyed watching/playing that

    • @farrel_ra
      @farrel_ra День назад +1

      I don't think he accept suggestion about what deck to play from RUclips's comment thread.

  • @phealotful
    @phealotful 2 дня назад

    Hi. Why not sacrifice Hubert and get more 5p cards? Will make mutagen stronger and 1 less thining card I guess isn't crucial?

    • @krajekdev
      @krajekdev 2 дня назад +10

      Thinning is winning.

  • @BiggusDingus325
    @BiggusDingus325 2 дня назад +1

    My face when the broken shit gets a skip this BC, again, but one of the strongest decks (symbiosis) gets a buff😂

    • @farrel_ra
      @farrel_ra 2 дня назад +1

      Well its his vote.. we can vote other 😊

    • @ArchangelMJZ
      @ArchangelMJZ 2 дня назад

      FMS is going to 8p this bc, that’s a major nerf that disrupts the council combo with Filavandrel

    • @BiggusDingus325
      @BiggusDingus325 2 дня назад

      ​@@ArchangelMJZ and shaping nature replaces FMS, with no row space limit down side like FMS, so buff to the deck overall.

    • @ArchangelMJZ
      @ArchangelMJZ 2 дня назад +1

      @@BiggusDingus325 I think overall SN will be significantly less oppressive than 2x FMS. The problem with Symbio is the 2-0 potential by winning r1 w aucwen. Then slamming Fila FMS and playing 11+p Witcher students in r2. Row space doesn’t come into play when the symbio player has round control. SN doesn’t have anywhere near this point slam 2-0 potential.

  • @fearlesswolf5928
    @fearlesswolf5928 2 дня назад +3

    Hate it when RUclipsrs make clickbait videos. That's not a meta-breaker you can easily lose to classic formation that's how bad it is. way too easy to control

    • @brennenporter7557
      @brennenporter7557 2 дня назад

      Is it not a meta-breaker for you then?

    • @roshanpaul8548
      @roshanpaul8548 2 дня назад +2

      The first match is literally against imposter which has much more control than formation. Muta provides enough carryover without needing the engine value. That’s the whole point of the deck. Are you aware of how it functions?

    • @roshanpaul8548
      @roshanpaul8548 2 дня назад +2

      Winning against warriors too which responded to every engine in round 1. Like how unaware are you of how this deck works? Control is not its weakness which is why it’s good in this meta and it could be referred to as a “meta breaker”

    • @honestabe411
      @honestabe411 2 дня назад +5

      Imagine taking this dead game so seriously, frankly “metabreaker” has always been a meme with regards to Gwent

    • @EzMcsteez
      @EzMcsteez 2 дня назад

      Bozo