Fifth Root Trick - Numberphile

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 авг 2024
  • A neat trick to quickly calculate fifth roots.
    More links & stuff in full description below ↓↓↓
    Featuring Simon Pampena, Australian Numeracy Ambassador.
    / mathemaniac
    Support us on Patreon: / numberphile
    NUMBERPHILE
    Website: www.numberphile...
    Numberphile on Facebook: / numberphile
    Numberphile tweets: / numberphile
    Subscribe: bit.ly/Numberph...
    Numberphile is supported by the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI): bit.ly/MSRINumb...
    Videos by Brady Haran
    Brady's videos subreddit: / bradyharan
    Brady's latest videos across all channels: www.bradyharanb...
    Sign up for (occasional) emails: eepurl.com/YdjL9
    Numberphile T-Shirts: teespring.com/...
    Other merchandise: store.dftba.co...
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 1,1 тыс.

  • @JaceLeeRogers
    @JaceLeeRogers 7 лет назад +1676

    Euler was such a badass. His work is everywhere.

    • @wurttmapper2200
      @wurttmapper2200 5 лет назад +310

      There's a joke that says all things in math are named after the second person that discovered them, because the first one was always Euler

    • @markiyanhapyak349
      @markiyanhapyak349 5 лет назад +3

      Yeah… .

    • @shugaroony
      @shugaroony 5 лет назад +2

      @Alexis Hazel DeSilva They truly were astonishing.

    • @taelyrics3070
      @taelyrics3070 5 лет назад +7

      Hes no joke hes a real genius

    • @JAzzWoods-ik4vv
      @JAzzWoods-ik4vv 4 года назад +2

      He definitely was, but I wonder how much of that was because simply not that many people were able to study mathematics at and before his time.

  • @footie21
    @footie21 10 лет назад +3724

    Ah the classic 69^5

    • @IronWarrior4Ever
      @IronWarrior4Ever 7 лет назад +99

      5 parties of 69 bro

    • @davecrupel2817
      @davecrupel2817 7 лет назад +2

      Tom Stack genius

    • @JN-ls4id
      @JN-ls4id 7 лет назад +17

      of course they would do that

    • @KuraIthys
      @KuraIthys 6 лет назад +55

      "That was a bit hard, but I got used to it."
      ... Yeah.... I bet. >__

    • @afrahshah6800
      @afrahshah6800 5 лет назад +1

      1.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

  • @Hunter7023
    @Hunter7023 10 лет назад +709

    Dude looks like an evil genius waiting for you to say that big number.

  • @greg55666
    @greg55666 10 лет назад +1150

    Dude interviewing the other guy, if you turn your phone sideways you can use the scientific calculator to get 38^5 directly.

    • @mattbritzius570
      @mattbritzius570 8 лет назад +36

      +Numberphile nice attempted save

    • @tune_m
      @tune_m 8 лет назад +4

      +Srcsqwrn I'm fine with you being fine with this.

    • @superperfectstranger815
      @superperfectstranger815 8 лет назад +9

      Android says square root 2 x2 is 2.8 so it's not number phile approved😃

    • @BlockWorker
      @BlockWorker 8 лет назад +88

      sqrt(2)^2 = 2, not sqrt(2)x2 :)

    • @dansussman5439
      @dansussman5439 7 лет назад +2

      I'm disapointed, rip maths

  • @redwings02
    @redwings02 9 лет назад +33

    This channel is simply one of the best to ever come out on RUclips. The amount of time I spend watching these videos is profane.

  • @DorFuchs
    @DorFuchs 10 лет назад +776

    I knew this trick with the third root. There for the last digit you have to swap 2 with 8 and 3 with 7 (and the other way around) and all the other are the same in the last digit.

    • @itsblack2321
      @itsblack2321 7 лет назад +9

      Same. Square roots too, but you need to do more work since all last digits have 2 possibilities

    • @maxwillich7822
      @maxwillich7822 6 лет назад +30

      Natürlich guckt DorFuchs Numberphile...

    • @MicroageHD
      @MicroageHD 6 лет назад +12

      Hahaha, DorFuchs du pussyslayer :D

    • @hajoscher
      @hajoscher 6 лет назад +1

      DorFuchs p

    • @MrSilverMo
      @MrSilverMo 5 лет назад

      ja DorFuchs!

  • @FostersAccount
    @FostersAccount 10 лет назад +311

    This dude's cool, get him here more often!

    • @KipIngram
      @KipIngram 4 года назад +3

      Check out his "Epic Circles" contribution. Just fascinating...

  • @helloofthebeach
    @helloofthebeach 10 лет назад +616

    Why is there a deer walking around in the background?

    • @robinbobilink
      @robinbobilink 9 лет назад +69

      Hero of the Beach Because it was open season on Mathematicians.

    • @thomassomeone4868
      @thomassomeone4868 9 лет назад +45

      That's Lulu. Brady's dog.

    • @fusion67
      @fusion67 6 лет назад +1

      no, its a cheetah.

    • @derekmartin5340
      @derekmartin5340 6 лет назад +2

      how did i not notice that xd

    • @devendrapatel197
      @devendrapatel197 6 лет назад +1

      That's dinosaur..-(1000x) smaller😂😁😂😁

  • @archilzhvania6242
    @archilzhvania6242 8 лет назад +214

    5:47 "a lot of kids loved 69 to the power 5" haha, those sassy kids :D

    • @x52m
      @x52m 7 лет назад +25

      it was a bit hard but i got used to it

    • @terryjacob1079
      @terryjacob1079 7 лет назад

      XD

    • @XxSteamStreamxX
      @XxSteamStreamxX 7 лет назад +5

      There is a trick similar to this with cube roots, and at one point i just remembered the number for 69^3...

  • @noahrichard130
    @noahrichard130 10 лет назад +127

    at 3:25 I thought that was a deer behind him. LOL

  • @musicguy595
    @musicguy595 10 лет назад +4

    This guy is my favorite of all the people you interview. He won me over when he split my brain in half about the number line in one of your previous videos.

  • @kylllroy5212
    @kylllroy5212 5 лет назад +26

    When he said, “How’d I do it so quickly?” I said to myself, “Cause your a genius.” Only to immediately hear him say, “Cause I’m a genius.”

  • @Cosmalano
    @Cosmalano 10 лет назад +135

    I started laughing so hard about the 69 thing.

    • @Shogun2Destroyer
      @Shogun2Destroyer 9 лет назад +3

      electrocat1 Liking this comment would be wrong...

    • @Cosmalano
      @Cosmalano 9 лет назад +6

      I waited for 69 likes for so long!

  • @ElegantEnsue
    @ElegantEnsue 10 лет назад +129

    Euler never seems to stop impressing me... from 300 years ago

    • @sixhundredandfive7123
      @sixhundredandfive7123 Год назад

      Every time I hit "like" when the number was originally Prime, I feel slightly bad.

  • @Locut0s
    @Locut0s 10 лет назад +60

    I've now watched every single numberphile video. Binge watched them over the past week. Nice work Brady! Doing the same now for your other channels :P

  • @UltimateTop10s
    @UltimateTop10s 10 лет назад +310

    Time to look incredibly clever in front of my friends!

    • @markiyanhapyak349
      @markiyanhapyak349 5 лет назад

      Do it!

    • @mastershooter64
      @mastershooter64 5 лет назад +4

      And fail miserably and get embarrased in front of ur friends

    • @adriannanad4675
      @adriannanad4675 4 года назад

      You mean your top 10 friends?

    • @footlover9416
      @footlover9416 4 года назад

      not to be that guy 6 years later but I feel like intelligent would he a better word

  • @mcrut111
    @mcrut111 10 лет назад +100

    Wow! Time to go win some bets!

  • @Srcsqwrn
    @Srcsqwrn 10 лет назад +28

    This video is fantastic.

  • @silentgloria
    @silentgloria 10 лет назад +397

    Video should end at 1:43 lol

  • @VodShod
    @VodShod 4 года назад +2

    I had a math pattern I found when in freshman year of collage that was like this. It was more thorough compared to Euler's Theorem. My Teachers refused to even look at it because and I quote, "You are just a student, you could never come up with anything of value." or "There is nothing you could have come up with that someone else hasn't already found."
    I sent you what I was able to work out through twitter. It has been over a decade since I came up with it and I just was remembering it off the top of my head so it may be not formatted correctly. I don't have any connections, so this is literally the best method I can think of to get any feedback on it. Yes this is just a shot in the dark... And now I am realizing that this is a old video and... nevermind... :(

  • @StubAtom
    @StubAtom 8 лет назад +57

    I love EULER

  • @josephwilles29
    @josephwilles29 8 лет назад +81

    Here is the proof behind Euler's theorem for a^5 = 10m + a. I will use a proof by induction.
    1.) Let's assume that a = 1, therefore, 1^5 = 10m + 1. 1 = 10m + 1. 0 = 10m, and therefore, m = 0. For m = 0, 1^5 = 10m + 1.
    2.) Let's assume that k^5 = 10m + k. Where m is an element of the set of integers.
    (k+1)^5 = k^5 + 5k^4 + 10k^3 + 10k^2 + 5k + 1.
    (k+1)^5 = 10p + k + 1, where p is an element of the set of integers.
    (k+1)^5 - k - 1 = 10p.
    k^5 + 5k^4 + 10k^3 + 10k^2 + 4k = 10p
    10m = k^5 - k
    10p - 10m = k^5 + 5k^4 + 10k^3 + 10k^2 + 4k - k^5 + k = 5k^4 + 10k^3 + 10k^2 + 5k.
    Therefore, 10p - 10m = 10(p-m). (p-m) is an element of the set of integers since the set of integers is closed by subtraction.
    From Subproof Awesome, below, we know that 5k^4 +10k^3 +10k^2 + 5k is always divisible by 10 for no matter what integer k.
    Therefore, a^5 = 10m + a
    End of Proof
    Subproof Awesome
    We need to prove that 5k^4 + 10k^3 + 10k^2 + 5k is always divisible by 10 for all k in the set of integers.
    Let's suppose that k = 1
    5(1^4) + 10(1^3) + 10(1^2) + 5(1) = 5 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 30. 30/10 = 3, and 3 is an integer. Therefore, it is true for k = 1.
    Let's suppose that for k = q is true, can we assume k = q+1 is true.
    5q^4 + 10q^3 + 10q^2 + 5q = 10h where h is an integer.
    5(q+1)^4 + 10(q+1)^3 +10(q+1)^2 + 5(q+1) = 5(q^4 + 4q^3+6q^2 + 4q + 1) + 10(q^3 + 3q^2 + 3q + 1) + 10(q^2 + 2q + 1) + 5(q+1) =
    5q^4 + 20q^3 +30q^2 + 20q + 5
    + 10q^3 +30q^2 + 30q + 10
    +10q^2 + 20q + 10
    + 5q + 5
    _____________________________________
    5q^4 + 30q^3 + 70q^2 + 75q + 30 = 10r, where r is an integer.
    Subtract 5q^4 + 10q^3 + 10q^2 + 5q from 5q^4 + 30q^3 + 60q^2 + 75q + 30 and you get 10r-10h.
    20q^3 + 50q^2 + 70q + 30 = 10(r-h)
    10(2q^3+5q^2+7q+3) = 10(r-h).
    As you can see, they are always divisible by 10.
    Therefore, for all k integers, 5k^4 + 10k^3 + 10k^2 + 5k is divisible by 10.
    END of Subproof Awesome

    • @CopiedOriginality
      @CopiedOriginality 8 лет назад +21

      You used so many ks the ku klux klan is inviting you to their next lynching

    • @thesage1096
      @thesage1096 8 лет назад

      +CopiedOriginality he didnt use a single K !

    • @ericdunn9001
      @ericdunn9001 8 лет назад

      +Joseph Willes But how is that a proof by induction? If you prove that the base case works (the smallest example of it working or the first step that you take) then you prove that it will work for any variable that comes after. Usually for that step we let n equal a new variable k.

    • @M0odez
      @M0odez 8 лет назад

      He is inducting on a in the main proof and then k in the subproof. There is no n.

    • @Fightclub1995
      @Fightclub1995 8 лет назад +2

      This isnt Eulers theorem.
      Eulers theorem is: a^phi (n) = 1 mod n

  • @Galakyllz
    @Galakyllz 10 лет назад +2

    That's a pretty neat trick. My usual math trick is to get someone to think of a number (while I think of the variable X), have them perform simple math operations (while I do the same to X), tell them to subtract their original number when I have some number plus X in my head, and then tell them what that number is. What's best is to ask what their favorite number is first and make it come out to that.
    Example:
    Pick a number, add 2, multiply by 3, subtract 3, divide by 3, subtract your original number: You're thinking of 1.
    In my head:
    X -> X+2 -> 3X+6 -> 3X+3 -> X+1 -> 1

  • @Ewtube101
    @Ewtube101 10 лет назад +6

    The same works for cubing/taking cube roots you just need to remember the answers to 1-9 cubed. The difference is that if the last digit is an 8 (e.g 74088) the last digit of the number you've cubed is 2 and vice versa (in this case the answer is 42) and if the last digit is 7 then the last digit of the number you have cubed is 3 and vice versa.

  • @me_hanics
    @me_hanics 8 лет назад +9

    Euler's theorem can be easily proved:
    The Little Fermat theorem says
    a^p - a is divideable by p, IF p is a prime.
    That means a^5 - a is divideable by 5.
    If it's divideable by 5, then the last number must be 0 or 5.
    If it ends with 5 then of course it's an odd number. If it ends with 0 then it's even. We just have to proof that it's even, so it ends in 0 every time.
    The way we show this is by doing this (i don't know how you say it in english):
    a^5 -a = a*(a^4 -1)
    If a is an even number then of course a*(a^4 -1) is even.
    If a is odd then a^4 is odd too, and a^4 -1 is even so our number is even again.
    We proved that it's even and divideable by 5, so it means it ends with 0.
    But if a^5 -a ends with 0, then a^5 ends with a.

    • @me_hanics
      @me_hanics 8 лет назад

      Ooops, I mean a^5 ends with a 's last number

    • @xFraaZen
      @xFraaZen 8 лет назад

      +Shri harsha Nayak Yeah, you're right sorry :/

  • @orangegold1
    @orangegold1 10 лет назад +35

    Fun tip... @ 1:04 on the calculator, you don't have to keep typing *38 = .. *38 = ... *38= .... --------- You can just type *38 once then press the "=" sign 4 times in a row, it will automatically preform the last operation (that being *38)

    • @Cr4zyCrudBuck3t
      @Cr4zyCrudBuck3t 7 лет назад +3

      I think he was trying to make sure people knew he was doing 38^5

    • @ritesh6487
      @ritesh6487 7 лет назад +3

      Albert Renshaw or you could just swipe the screen to the right....you will get a scientific calculator

    • @becomepostal
      @becomepostal 5 лет назад

      Or you could just write the result directly.

  • @WilliamDye-willdye
    @WilliamDye-willdye 10 лет назад +75

    Never take a pub bet against a Nottingham mathematician. :-)

  • @contemplatively
    @contemplatively 10 лет назад +7

    Love this channel. Really nice work. One note: you guys probably don't realize how a sharpie on brown paper sounds in a recording. To many people, it's worse than nails on a chalkboard.

    • @whoeveriam0iam14222
      @whoeveriam0iam14222 10 лет назад

      never thought it was annoying to hear. then again.. i don't care too much about nails on a chalkboard either

    • @Adamantium9001
      @Adamantium9001 10 лет назад +4

      Personal preference. I quite like it.

    • @evandonovan9239
      @evandonovan9239 6 лет назад

      I actually quite enjoy the sharpie sound. It's not grating like a chalkboard.

  • @willowspinner3383
    @willowspinner3383 10 лет назад +10

    Very cool. This reminded me of when I was first learning the times tables. I didn't enjoy memorizing them so I just memorized the 12 times table and convinced people that I new all the rest. Because I must if I can do 12x, right?

  • @Sceleri
    @Sceleri 8 лет назад +113

    69 was a bit hard. But i got used to it.

  • @appledog9545
    @appledog9545 5 лет назад +1

    no one in this world gets to business as quickly as Numberphile.. legit

  • @Vote4Drizzt
    @Vote4Drizzt 8 лет назад +7

    "Believe it or not, kids pick 69^5 a lot"
    I believe it....

  • @BradenBest
    @BradenBest 8 лет назад +5

    Mentally calculating 20^5 is easy: just apply the distributive property to exponentiation the same way you would with multiplication: 20^5 = (2 * 10)^5 = 2^5 * 10^5 = 32 * 100000 = 3200000
    30^5: 3^5 = 9 * 9 * 3 = 81 * 3 = 3(80 + 1) = 24 * 10 + 3 = 243 = 24300000
    40^5 = (4 * 10)^5 = 4^5 = 16 * 16 * 4 = 256 * 4 = 4(200 + 50 + 6) = 800 + 200 + 24 = 1024 * 10^5 = 102400000
    That's all mental calculation, except I have a trick for 4^5. I know that sqrt(4) = 2, so I can just double the magnitude and get 2^10, which I happen to know is 1,024. Or you can square 4, subtract 1 from and halve the magnitude to get 4^5 = 4^4 * 4^1 = 16^2 * 4

  • @ehaslage
    @ehaslage 9 лет назад +7

    "69 is a bit hard, but I got used to it." - Simon Pampena

  • @alo754
    @alo754 10 лет назад +12

    Damn it why couldn't all my math teachers in school be as enthusiastic as you?

    • @becomepostal
      @becomepostal 5 лет назад

      Equis Igriegazeta teachers are enthusiastic when they don’t crash into unmotivated students... (as you?)

  • @JustAnotherSunny
    @JustAnotherSunny 10 лет назад +189

    I can seem like I'm smart now

    • @htmlguy88
      @htmlguy88 9 лет назад

      JustAnotherSunny one thing I'd point out is that for the X0^5 stuff you can just know X ^5 and how many zeroes it would have at the end times 5 are added on. in fact this potentially allows you to if you pay attention to do any number to the power of 5 in theory except they overlap at times.

  • @Agnostic080
    @Agnostic080 10 лет назад +18

    Awesome trick, thanks for sharing! ;)

  • @Fredthe99th
    @Fredthe99th 10 лет назад +9

    I love this guy!
    I get the feeling he is really smart, really really smart, and I always feel he could probably work it out in long hand if he wanted. Great video, thanks

  • @shikamarunara8920
    @shikamarunara8920 8 лет назад

    ok , i will admit that i am more of a numberphile than i was before watching this video, this channel is not only for someone who is a numberphile to enjoy, it will slowly make you in to one, just give it some time . thanks a lot for everything :)

  • @MikeBMW
    @MikeBMW 10 лет назад +2

    Question: "It's a big task to remember that"
    Response: "Is it?"
    I love it! :)
    Great minds are always interesting. Thanks! :)

  • @XavierGouchet
    @XavierGouchet 10 лет назад +3

    You can extend this trick to any odd power (my dad used to teach me how to do it to find cube roots). The basic idea is to remember 10³, 20³, 30³ and so on. And obviously know the last digit of any digit cubed (as the euler's theorem only works witha power of 5). It can also work for power 7, 9, and 11 (I have not checked other powers)

  • @TimmacTR
    @TimmacTR 10 лет назад +16

    I didn't even know something called a fifth root existed.. :)

    • @RubenHogenhout
      @RubenHogenhout 6 лет назад

      I gues you don t know the solution of X^5 + 5t*X^3 + 5t^2*X = -2q = 0 then.

  • @TheRedstoneTaco
    @TheRedstoneTaco 8 лет назад

    Dude Im knows as the smart kid in my class and when I go back to school monday I'm gonna blow everyone's minds. You've done it again numberphile!

  • @RODALCO2007
    @RODALCO2007 10 лет назад +21

    Great number tricks, thanks for sharing.

  • @Prazkat
    @Prazkat 9 лет назад +117

    I didn't know Russell Brand was a math genius!!

    • @trickster0231
      @trickster0231 9 лет назад +4

      Prazkat Reviews He looks more like Matthew Santoro to me.

    • @thejiminator8816
      @thejiminator8816 7 лет назад +3

      the first sword of bravos does not run

    • @rushthezeppelin
      @rushthezeppelin 6 лет назад +3

      He really does not look all that much like Russell Brand.....Doesn't have enough of an aloof look about him for one.

    • @TheThreatenedSwan
      @TheThreatenedSwan 6 лет назад +4

      He doesn't look enough like a slimy, bohemian socialist

  • @dogeness
    @dogeness 10 лет назад +391

    I wonder if he knows why kids choose 69^5...

    • @yan-qu5zm
      @yan-qu5zm 7 лет назад +3

      likemynewname lol that's what I've been thinking

    • @onecommunistboi
      @onecommunistboi 7 лет назад +41

      Pretty sure he does

    • @GeodesicBruh
      @GeodesicBruh 5 лет назад +6

      He’s a mathematician, therefore he doesn’t know.
      I’m a mathematician in the making so don’t take it too personally I’m just joking lol.

    • @Xnoob545
      @Xnoob545 4 года назад

      its because its used in lots of memes and stuff
      They probably dont know the true meaning
      The true meaning i-

  • @Ang3l_dwg
    @Ang3l_dwg 5 лет назад +2

    Dude this guy is legit, MORE OF HIM!!

  • @mrboredj
    @mrboredj 10 лет назад +1

    I wish numberphile was around when I was at school. I was ok at maths, but I think if I saw the beauty in it I would have been far more interested.

  • @NoriMori1992
    @NoriMori1992 8 лет назад +146

    Haha, 69^5. Kids. XD

  • @mphayes98
    @mphayes98 4 года назад +3

    This will forever be the nicest ending to a Numberphile video

  • @olgahall1948
    @olgahall1948 Год назад +1

    “That’s STILL a big ask, to memorize all that” LOL - I too, was here hoping that the trick were a lot easier than this- 😅

  • @AkibaMCRGrenias
    @AkibaMCRGrenias 10 лет назад +4

    Haha! It would've been awesome if the video ended at 1:39 right after he says "I'm a genius" And we were all like whaaaat? xD

  • @darkmage07070777
    @darkmage07070777 10 лет назад +96

    Yay, new party trick!
    ...yes, my parties are frequented by drunk geeks, why do you ask?

  • @Pooua
    @Pooua 10 лет назад +5

    That's a neat trick, but how likely am I ever to need to know the fifth root? It isn't like square roots or even cube roots, which come up all the time!

  • @UberOcelot
    @UberOcelot 6 лет назад

    This is one of the loveliest videos on the internet.

  • @TamissonReis
    @TamissonReis 10 лет назад +1

    I really love when you post this videos with captions. I'm brasilian and i really don't understand much things. The math is ok, but i lost all jokes :/

  • @cristalex7490
    @cristalex7490 7 лет назад +3

    I've seen this repeats with all (1+multiple of 4) powers like ^(1+4) or ^(1+8). The last digit stays the same.
    To use a similar trick, you just have to learn the powers of the numbers from 0 to 9 (I guess is because 10 base numerical system.).

    • @nikhilnagaria2672
      @nikhilnagaria2672 2 года назад

      It does because a^5=10m+a, times this by a^4, and get a^9=10ma^4+a^5=10ma^4+10m+a, and same for a^8, etc

    • @davinchristino
      @davinchristino 2 года назад

      A slight variation of the trick allows for all 3+multiple of 4 powers.

  • @peppybocan
    @peppybocan 10 лет назад +7

    well, memoization may work for these small numbers, but what to do, if I am handling sextillions ??

  • @tywinlannister8015
    @tywinlannister8015 10 лет назад

    These guys never stop surprising me. Great job.

  • @JamesSkemp
    @JamesSkemp 10 лет назад +1

    Now this I could see trying to use in social situations. Very cool.

  • @DJLad16
    @DJLad16 10 лет назад +3

    This is really cool, can't really share because I don't want my friends to know about this :)

  • @Nerdthagoras
    @Nerdthagoras 10 лет назад +8

    Simple way to memorize the first digit.
    10^5 is the same as 1^5 with 5 0s after
    20^5 is the same as 2^5 with 5 0s after
    and so on. So just learn your powers of 5

    • @becomepostal
      @becomepostal 5 лет назад

      Kumartheffar that’s quite obvious, isn’t it?

  • @FuckingSlayeeeer
    @FuckingSlayeeeer 10 лет назад

    Please give us more calculator unboxings. I need more. I need them!

  • @PieManTheHero
    @PieManTheHero 5 лет назад

    Here's a proof of the property that makes it work:
    Since phi(10) = 4, Euler's theorem states that a^4 ≡ 1 (mod 10), multiplying both sides by a gives that a^5 ≡ a (mod 10), which means that 10 divides a^5 - a. This means that there exists a number q such that 10q = a^5 - a, which gives us that a^5 = 10q + a.

  • @notatruestatement
    @notatruestatement 9 лет назад +227

    5:50 I wonder why the children say 69 :3 koff koff

    • @error.418
      @error.418 9 лет назад +1

      ***** I have no idea what you're trying to say.

    • @DjVortex-w
      @DjVortex-w 9 лет назад

      Samurai Nakruf Because they are immature?

    • @notatruestatement
      @notatruestatement 9 лет назад

      WarpRulez no, to trick him. :D

    • @GameDogLeader21
      @GameDogLeader21 9 лет назад +3

      ***** 69, 9 is just 6 upside down so its neat and easy to remember pattern.

    • @error.418
      @error.418 9 лет назад +18

      GameDogLeader21 Sure, but that's not the reason the children find it amusing to suggest it and get excited about it

  • @Zeturic
    @Zeturic 10 лет назад +34

    I personally really hate the "root" notation. It just obscures the relationship with exponentiation. Is it really that much harder to say to the 1/5 power instead of 5th root?

    • @Lukexxxxxx
      @Lukexxxxxx 10 лет назад +11

      yes, however my advice is: deal with it. that's the least of problems a mathematician could have.
      also, is anyone stopping you from using the power notation and not using the root-notation at all?

    • @z121231211
      @z121231211 10 лет назад +4

      That's really only a problem when kids first learn about them (like 2pi vs tau) and with little practice it becomes hard to tell if it was ever a problem to begin with. If you really want you could mess with people by saying "the 1/2th root of X" for X^2.

    • @connfdm
      @connfdm 7 лет назад +2

      how much harder is it to multiply by a fraction to divide, or add to a negative number to subtract?

  • @canadiannuclearman
    @canadiannuclearman 5 лет назад +2

    i was told the equation
    X^5-X will always be divisable by 30. i tried a lot of numbers and it all worked out to me true. now can you prove it? and is this related to the above.
    Example 2^5-2= 30

    • @tensor131
      @tensor131 5 лет назад

      Yes it can be proved .. Factorising gives (x-1)x(x+1)(x^2+1) .. The first three factors guarantee an even number and a multiple of 3. If none of the first three factors divides by 5 then either x-1 or x+1 must be adjacent to a multiple of 5. So either x-1=5n+1 or x+1=5n-1 and in either case we find that 5 divides x^2+1. QED

  • @TheGaIaxy
    @TheGaIaxy 10 лет назад

    LOL! Every kid knows the infamous 69. EVERYONE OF THEM!
    I dared my maths teacher to calculate in his head "69 x 69". My ten year old self believed no one can do it because of the 9's at the end. Too bad he worked it out in like 10 seconds.
    Turns out you can multiply the number with the 9 unit to the next number. So he calculated 69 x 70 by multiplying then 10 then minus 69. I don't know why he said that way is easy! But thanks to him, I appreciated the 9 multiples and gained more insight in number manipulation. Awesome maths teacher!

  • @darthvatrayen
    @darthvatrayen 10 лет назад +28

    Why does the number have to be in English?

    • @mustafaemrebasaran7701
      @mustafaemrebasaran7701 7 лет назад +4

      Maybe he doesn't speak any other language...

    • @kabochaVA
      @kabochaVA 6 лет назад +1

      Because in languages like German or Arabic, you don't say "sixty-eight", but "eight and sixty".
      In German, for instance, it's "achtundsechzig" (8 and 60).
      Hope that answers your question... albeit 4 years later.

  • @SparkySywer
    @SparkySywer 10 лет назад +27

    Also was that a deer?

    • @djkm9558
      @djkm9558 6 лет назад

      looked like it

  • @jamesburke2094
    @jamesburke2094 10 лет назад +1

    Presumably the key figures here are 5 and 2 because their product is 10 (the base of our number system), so if it was based on 12 numbers the trick would work for 4th roots which are 3 digits in length and 6th roots of 2 digits in length.

  • @Grombo79
    @Grombo79 7 лет назад

    i love watching this man talk about maths.

  • @oakenguitar3
    @oakenguitar3 10 лет назад +4

    does this work in other bases other than base 10 such as base 12? I'm too lazy to figure it out myself.

  • @unpronouncable2442
    @unpronouncable2442 10 лет назад +33

    hey Braidy ask your proffesors about spheres. more precisely about
    1. turning sphere inside out
    2. makeing 2 spheres (or actualy any number of spheres) from one sphere (you can cut a sphere into very small puzzle pieces and then when you put these pieces back together you can do so in such a way that you can make two or more spheres)

  • @max2551
    @max2551 4 года назад

    I tried to figure out a rule before he explained his trick. I came up with something similar, to guess the leftmost number. Since it was between 100,000 and 10,000,000,000, the root had to be between 10 and 100. Dividing by 100,000, I found out the number was between 3^5=243 and 4^5=1024, so the leftmost number had to be 3. For the rightmost, I tried most digits (some were obvious) to see how the 5th power ended, and was a bit surprised to find out they were always identical to the original number, so that gave the 8. Very cool !

  • @ehhhhhhhhhh
    @ehhhhhhhhhh 10 лет назад +1

    I did some experimenting and found this same method works for every other odd root. a^5, a^9, a^13, a^17, a^21, etc. The other odd roots (a^7, a^11, a^15, etc.) also work, but you must memorize the possible outcomes (Ex: ending in 6 predicts the root ends in 4). Evens (a^6, a^8, a^10...) do follow patterns, but cannot be summarized in a predictive function (1-in, 1-out).

  • @pussylumpessru
    @pussylumpessru 10 лет назад +9

    Whys there a deer in the back!!!?

  • @luzvs21
    @luzvs21 10 лет назад +22

    do a video on 1,000,000 factorial

  • @kevinding1204
    @kevinding1204 3 года назад

    The engineer joke at 4:53 made my day lol thanks 😊

  • @FlyingTurtleLP
    @FlyingTurtleLP 10 лет назад +2

    Love that stuff! Enjoyed it a ton.

  • @coopergates9680
    @coopergates9680 9 лет назад +6

    The only issue is giving him a non-perfect fifth root, such as taking the fifth root of a random number like 766445.

    • @tyraelarchangel183
      @tyraelarchangel183 9 лет назад +13

      That's the trick, he said think of any two digit number. This implies it's an integer between 10 and 99. Then he told that person to multiply it by itself 5 times and tell him the result.
      They didn't start by giving him a large number and asking for it's fifth root, that would likely not be an integer result.

  • @northzealand
    @northzealand 9 лет назад +8

    1 min in when he is on the calculator; Simon goes into "Gollum mode" :) hahahahahaha

  • @23sugy
    @23sugy 10 лет назад

    If anyone cares: Eulers theorem states that a^(φ(n)) ≡ 1 (mod n) where n and a are coprime and φ(n) is number of numbers that are smaller than n and are coprime with n. So for example for n=10: φ(n)=4 (1,3,7 and 9). Therefore:
    a^4 ≡ 1 (mod 10)
    We multiply equation by a:
    a^5 ≡ a (mod 10)
    So any number to the power of five ends with the same digit as the number

  • @boRegah
    @boRegah 3 года назад

    This dude is just so... freakin... competent!!
    Great job! You make me proud! 🤗

  • @relike868p
    @relike868p 10 лет назад +4

    phi(10) = phi(2)*phi(5) = (2-1)(5-1) = 4

  • @2bsirius
    @2bsirius 10 лет назад +43

    WHO are the cretins who thumbed this down?

  • @ronitbiswal2729
    @ronitbiswal2729 5 лет назад

    Bro you are greatest mathematician for me on youtube

  • @MrAdrianeagle
    @MrAdrianeagle 10 лет назад

    I shall blow some minds now , Thanks Brady and Mr. Simon Pampena :D

  • @sammbci
    @sammbci 9 лет назад +11

    I have to say I enjoyed this video much more because it featured russell brand.

    • @ShamelessHorse
      @ShamelessHorse 9 лет назад +2

      If it was Russell Brand he would have taken four times as long explaining it. :P
      I do like Russell actually, but Simon looks nothing like him IMHO.

    • @magma2680
      @magma2680 9 лет назад

      ShamelessHorse woah, so Russel Brand does mathematics even? ffs missing out on so much

  • @Anonymous71475
    @Anonymous71475 10 лет назад +5

    3:25 a dog!

  • @christianridings1870
    @christianridings1870 7 лет назад

    Because the 5th powers of the multiples of 10 are just used for rough comparison, you don't need to memorize all the digits. The code I use (in terms of millions) is 10=.1, 20=3, 30=25, 40=100, 50=300, 60=800, 70=1600, 80=3200, 90=6000

  • @tom_something
    @tom_something 2 года назад

    A lot of this stuff goes over my head, but when he showed the formula that included "ten times something plus the original number", I was at least able to reason out that it meant the second digit of a two-digit whole number on the input would be the last digit in the output. Small blessings. Been about twenty years from the last time I was in a math class. Nice to know I haven't lost everything.
    And actually, looking at the way it's written one last time, I see now that that's... that's pretty much the entirety of what that formula means, isn't it? On its own, the sole conclusion is that the "ones" digit is persistent. That is simply a translation from the thing I said in English (well, from Euler's perspective probably either German or French) into math. So I didn't really divine anything out of the tea leaves. I just translated a mathematical sentence into English. Which isn't _nothing,_ but I guess all I've accomplished here is a basic literacy test.

  • @loFEEzy.
    @loFEEzy. 8 лет назад +68

    0:37 O-oooooooooo AAAAE-A-A-I-A-U-
    JO-oooooooooooo AAE-O-A-A-U-U-A-
    E-eee-ee-eee AAAAE-A-E-I-E-A-
    JO-ooo-oo-oo-oo EEEEO-A-AAA-AAAA

  • @borisdorofeev5602
    @borisdorofeev5602 6 лет назад +6

    Is it big?
    Yea it's big, are you ready?
    °¿°
    `

  • @teekanne15
    @teekanne15 10 лет назад +1

    oh how I would have loved maths with an ambitions teacher like him

  • @codebeard
    @codebeard 10 лет назад +1

    You can do the same thing with other roots too, like 9th, 17th, 21st, 25th, 33rd and 41st. 41st roots are really cool because the last TWO DIGITS are the same as the given number. For example, 23^41 = 67739389260745218861137988047774370539553852007909099223

  • @joshuajansen7125
    @joshuajansen7125 10 лет назад +25

    You know that you can turn an iPhone calculator into a scientific calculator (roots and exponents and etc) by rotating it 90°?

    • @Stubbari
      @Stubbari 9 лет назад +1

      Scientific calculator :D

  • @CalebTroyer
    @CalebTroyer 10 лет назад +3

    Pause at 1:05. Scary.

  • @Oniontears123TNG
    @Oniontears123TNG 10 лет назад +1

    If a number is divisible by three, the sum of its base 10 digits is also divisible by three. That's just a fun trick I use all the time.

  • @gbortolotf
    @gbortolotf 4 года назад

    "I wasn't paying attention, don't take it so seriously". I'd like to say that to my boss after the meeting.