Edge of Tomorrow "only" goes down to 10Hz. It's 5 x single frequency tones - 30Hz,25Hz,20Hz,15Hz and 10Hz - so technically the 1723 2V did play it all back
After testing that sequence on my 1723 2V sub, I set up the subsonic filter to start rolling off at 20hz - I couldn't feel anything at all on the 10hz part. Maybe it's my room (40 square meters, fairly big living room).
I've been eagerly waiting someone to do a review on the new line of subs, thanks Shane! So to summarise, Arendal have extended the response to provide more low end, but stuck to their 'dynamics' ethos. So it's the same dilemma we face with the old line of Arendal subs. Would you prefer a fatter, gruntier sound? If so then go SVS. Or do you prefer a more lean faster paced sound? If so, then go Arendal. That is, until price comes into it. On paper, the 1723 2S is the same as the SB4000 but two SB4000's cost £3598 (black gloss) whereas two 2S's cost £4200 (black gloss). To put that into perspective, that's dangerously close to the same price point as two PB4000's! (£4498 gloss black). On the contrary two 1V's cost just £3400. So do you sacrifice a bit of power and gain more in extension with the two Arendal ported subs, or do you have more power an sacrifice a bit of extension with two SVS sealed subs within the same price range?
@@therealshanelee I dont mean to step on your toes, I got some contacts and I've sent them an email about that :). Now its up to them to contact you if you still are interested :).
I wouldn't. As usual REL is too focused on being musical, even with their 'home theatre' line. They have a -6db@21Hz response. Yeeah no thank you. Arendal is the best middle ground. SVS digs deep but is fat and slow, Arendal doesn't dig as deep but is lean and much faster paced. REL's punch is so shallow it's more like a slap but it delivers those slaps at a much faster pace than Arendal's and SVS's punches. Usually a fast paced shallow punch is better for music and well, REL have their traditional subs for that so the Predator line really has no place.
@@AWSimDrifter , I have had the ported SVS PC 2000 which was nice and now the Rel Predator which is very nice. It punches real hard especially in movies like Underwater, Terminator Dark Fate, John Wick 3 ( Gunshots inside the hotel scene) etc. It may not have the deep extension but I don't miss that at all considering how it plays the other frequencies. Also it's great with music. I don't think for my tastes I need a ported sub. Best part is you don't have to tinker around too much to blend it with the fronts.
Thanks for the video, I see you measure with REW when seeing those 10 Hz. Can you comment on what acoustic treatment it has and what reverberation is in T2 and T30? How far away is the listening point? I write using google translator. Greetings
Nice review! Will you be reviewing the sealed 1723 2s version as well? Im deliberating between dual Arendal 1723 2S vs SVS SB4000 vs REL1508. I am amazed at the value of the RELs but they dont have any DSP and my options in placement is limited so I need all the help I can get. So SVS & Arendal are pulling ahead...
@@medic17508 I have two 1723 2s right now. Im happy with them 😀 plenty of power and honestly, I don’t use their full potential. I think that the most important feature is the app control. I would never go back to using a sub without app control. Its so critical to be able to control volume and eq to tune them well in your room when watching material that are mixed at different levels. Honestly, i think both A2S and SvsSB16 will probably satisfy. However, if you have room and finances, I’d be considering their ported alternatives for ultimate no compromise performance. So the question is sealed or vented, not svs or arendal. If you can go to get a demo of a vented sub vs a sealed sub you’ll know what’s right for you. Do you currently own any subs? Or will this be your first purchase? Since im thinking about it… given what I know today, Id probably go for dual SVS 3000 micro or smaller sealed alternatives since I do have some space constraints to deal with. If i had more space, or a dedicated room id 100% go for a vented sub. The 2s are great subs, but if you can go big, go huge 😀
I suspect you’ll be hard pressed to find a single cabinet dual sub with built in DSP, 7 filters and solid output down to 10 Hz at this price point. Impressive to say the least. The LED screen while very nice is probably unnecessary especially once you have the app
It is - until the app stops working due to lack of updates, new phone which is not supported, BT module on the sub fails or a multitude of other reasons. The LED screen is one of the reasons why I bought one of these over the B&W flagship sub, which has ZERO controls on it whatsoever - only an app that hardly works at all. Coming from an IT background, I'm all about the redundancies though.
@@therealshanelee ok I value quickness over extension. I want those Fury cannon shots to hit hard and fast/tight:) Trying to decide between 4 x 1508's or the new carbon special to complement my two s212sx's
Why 2V and not 1S? I can't find any reviews for the new 1S, which I'm considering as an alternative to SVS SB3000 (both are sealed) BTW, you can use any sub with two systems, by using the two inputs (1&2 or L&R RCA), or by the help of MiniDSP 2X4HD.
Hello I have a question are kef ceiling speakers any good and which av receiver is good for a Atmos setup and reliable example Central channel two sides 1 subwoofer 2 rear surround and 4 height ceiling speakers channels. One more question are kef q drive speakers worth buying for home cinema setup? Thank you
I got my 1961 i v Yesterday and it is Just as expected a very Clean and dry Punch aß i never heared. I have a humb Problem, which i will get solved tonight, After Work. With that subwoofers you can Bring your Home Cinema to a whole new level. I cant Imagine how brutal the 1723 must punch..
Shane, which one is better, the Arendal 2V or the Martin Logan BalancedForce 212? I remember you liking the BalancedForce 212 a lot more especially how it sounded with the Edge of Tomorrow intro.
Hey Shane I’m a big fan of your videos. Helped me a lot with my home theatre journey. I am making a big decision and I really needed your opinion as you have tested the Perlisten lineup as well as these Arendal subs I have my eyes on. Compared to the Perlisten R series ( I am highly considering R215S) would these Arendal 1723 2V be just as good? The Perlistens are significantly more here in Canada (7500 before taxes for the R215S) or I can get the 1723 2V for $5000 CAD. You have also recently tested the r210s. How are those compared to the Arendal? Right now I have a single SVS PB2000 pro and I’m craving that low frequency feel to the body and pressurization. I would really appreciate your opinion!
@@therealshanelee Hey Shane, thank you for the quick response brotha! If I could save 4-5gs would you recommend the Arendal 1723 2V over the R210s or R215s? I know the D series would be endgame but it’s way out of my budget in Canada. My seating position is 6-7 ft away from the front stage speakers and sub and my room is 12X12. I just don’t want to deal with that mechanical noise at low frequencies you discussed in the PSA subwoofer. If the Arendal don’t have that issue I will definitely go with it. But if you think Perlisten R215S is worth it over Arendal then I’ll highly consider even with the price difference
To my knowledge Pb16 does not reach 10 hz / 100 db - and regarding EOT start - who cares just a stupid demo and does not tell much. I like that the 2 v you can turn display upside / down when you lean over it. Agree with the app thing that would be nice. Amazing with all the settings and filters in the amp. Could be my next sub. Thx for the review !
Watched a ton of your videos trying to determine the best sub for home theater....so which sub would YOU get (cost not being a factor)? I have Bowers&Wilkins 703 S2 towers, HTM 71 S2 center (Polk Fxi A6 Sides and Rears) powered by Marantz SR7011.
Question, running Paradigm monitor (the newest and very inexpensive) was looking at a Dynaudio (maybe evoke, but ouch with the price!) then I saw this and looked at the 1961 series( both brands I would get all speakers for 5.1.2,but dyn doesn't have height so just 5.0 then rel sub with dyn) . (here's the Q) from listening yourself would you mind giving me an opinion on best for the money upgrade? (also have a NAD 758 for receiver) thanks! #brokeaudiophile 🤣🤣😢
No offense to Shane but I think the 'single digit' infrasonics bit is just incorrect. The REW of the PB16s and from what we know of the PB16s, they fall of a cliff at 15hz. And Shane's REW attests to that. Whatever infrasonics shane is feeling from the PB16 (and not the Arendals) I don't think is to do with anything single digit because the PB16s just aren't that kind of speaker. I wonder how the 1V will compare to the 2V. The 2V is awesome but the placement flexibility due to having to accomdate TWO drivers is a pain in the butt...
@@aoaaron6166 I still think they will drop off fast below 10 Hz due to their built in filter. The fast drop off below 10 Hz is because the filter is set like that.
Wow. What subwoofer *can* handle the single digit infrasonic scene in Edge of Tomorrow?!? I've seen several reviews of otherwise great subs, and you say they all can't handle it.
Huge JTR, PSA, Deepsea etc. Can do it properly. the intro scene asks atleast 115db clean output at 10hz at reference levels it should make you feel almost dizzy.
Who cares about that little intro - no other movie have that demand. Monument scene in olympus has fallen is way more important. This 10 hz thing is just a test tone and not an actual sound effect. Btw the svs pb 16 ultras does not hit 10 hz and if so way down the db range. Look at meassurements found out there like audioholics !
so if the subwoofers are opposed, they will automatically have an isobaric loading with one moving out while the other is moving in (flipped polarity for one of the drivers), as far as i know and remember, there isn't ANY isobaric subwoofers which are ported and will just mess everything up. This is only my knowledge tho so maybe someone can help me answer this question.
@@kevinwest1607 i have done more research and found that you CAN run isobaric loading using ports. If you run a subwoofer back to back like this subwoofer then it would probably be a no brainer to flip the second driver's polarity making it a isobaric loaded subwoofer. There are a lot of isobaric loaded subwoofer like these magnet to magnet isobaric loaded subwoofer like the devialet phantom, PSA dual sealed series and a lot more. but so far i have found none to have a port which makes this sub really interesting.
Do u think the 2v sound signature are better because the port is at the back not the front ? ,Compare to the SVS 16. have tried the sb 3000s in comparison , as they are sealed what would u compare the 2v to them ?
its probably the better dynamics which arendal explain in their interview with shane. the dua opposing drivers will definitely improve the tightness in bass and minimise cabinet movement. why are u comparing a sealed to a vented sub? the arendals are going to (in vented mode) have a lot more output. I'd assume as its bigger in cabniet size alone.. its going to out-do the sb 3000 comfortably even in sealed mode.
Comparing the graphs of these to the KEF KF92's response in your room from that review shows that the KEF's measure much better. In terms of real world performance though, how big of a difference do you find with these being massive ported boxes compared to the small sealed KEF's?
@@therealshanelee PS: have you thought about testing JBL pro speakers? they are inexpensive and have high sensitivity, which has the advantage of not needing powerful and expensive amplifiers.
So are you staying with the SVS PB16 or changing Them out to the Arendal 2V ..? And if so why ..?
Best regards
0:55 Nice singing Shane 👌
Edge of Tomorrow "only" goes down to 10Hz. It's 5 x single frequency tones - 30Hz,25Hz,20Hz,15Hz and 10Hz - so technically the 1723 2V did play it all back
After testing that sequence on my 1723 2V sub, I set up the subsonic filter to start rolling off at 20hz - I couldn't feel anything at all on the 10hz part. Maybe it's my room (40 square meters, fairly big living room).
@@PragmaticTornado Ofcourse you dont feel it when you have subsonic filter on. Subsonic filter cuts out the under 20hz sounds
Yes. Thinking of buying some of the Arendal sub then.
The sound from the subs also depends on how your room are among other things then. Thinking of the new 1723 2s or the 2v then.
You are correct. They could perform very differently in your room.
This must be insane, I have just 1 x 1V in my living room and I like it a lot!
I've been eagerly waiting someone to do a review on the new line of subs, thanks Shane! So to summarise, Arendal have extended the response to provide more low end, but stuck to their 'dynamics' ethos. So it's the same dilemma we face with the old line of Arendal subs. Would you prefer a fatter, gruntier sound? If so then go SVS. Or do you prefer a more lean faster paced sound? If so, then go Arendal. That is, until price comes into it. On paper, the 1723 2S is the same as the SB4000 but two SB4000's cost £3598 (black gloss) whereas two 2S's cost £4200 (black gloss). To put that into perspective, that's dangerously close to the same price point as two PB4000's! (£4498 gloss black). On the contrary two 1V's cost just £3400. So do you sacrifice a bit of power and gain more in extension with the two Arendal ported subs, or do you have more power an sacrifice a bit of extension with two SVS sealed subs within the same price range?
@SpareChange great review! What about testing XTZ 3x12 subwoofer?
Yeah I am interesteed in them as well :)
They are hard to get a hold of.
@@therealshanelee we know you can do It 😎
@@therealshanelee I dont mean to step on your toes, I got some contacts and I've sent them an email about that :). Now its up to them to contact you if you still are interested :).
@@Fathernimman hopefully it pans out.
Try to stack the arendal subs as they recommend on the website and in the manual then
i enjoy your reaction shots to the bass....very theatrical.....
Can u do a review of the psa s3612 then.?.
I think i would still pick 2 REL 1508 but these ones seem to be a beast.
i wonder how 2x REL 1508 will compare to 2x Arendal 1V... ;)
I wouldn't. As usual REL is too focused on being musical, even with their 'home theatre' line. They have a -6db@21Hz response. Yeeah no thank you. Arendal is the best middle ground. SVS digs deep but is fat and slow, Arendal doesn't dig as deep but is lean and much faster paced. REL's punch is so shallow it's more like a slap but it delivers those slaps at a much faster pace than Arendal's and SVS's punches. Usually a fast paced shallow punch is better for music and well, REL have their traditional subs for that so the Predator line really has no place.
@@AWSimDrifter have you heard them all? Trying to decide Arendal 2v x 2 or 6 pack rel 1508
@@AWSimDrifter, righto!!! LoL.
@@AWSimDrifter , I have had the ported SVS PC 2000 which was nice and now the Rel Predator which is very nice. It punches real hard especially in movies like Underwater, Terminator Dark Fate, John Wick 3 ( Gunshots inside the hotel scene) etc.
It may not have the deep extension but I don't miss that at all considering how it plays the other frequencies. Also it's great with music. I don't think for my tastes I need a ported sub. Best part is you don't have to tinker around too much to blend it with the fronts.
IF you have to choose between these and the REL RF92? Which one would you pick?
Wow ❤😋 Which amplifier powering the two arendal subwoofers
The avalanche 1200 iq amp drives the 1723 2s and 2v sub then. 😊👍
When are you going to get a pair of PSA TV1812s in there?
How do you place a sub with opposing speakers? Does one speaker face the wall or both face sideways? Does it even matter?
Hi Shane how did u connect the arendals...I see no lfe at back
Wow that on screen settings, it replaces the use of a mini dsp, especially when they make the phone app.
Paradigms subs have that too with ARC room correction. Works great.
They come very well packaged. I like that dull finish. Very classy looking subwoofer.
I dig the dull.
Thanks for the video, I see you measure with REW when seeing those 10 Hz.
Can you comment on what acoustic treatment it has and what reverberation is in T2 and T30?
How far away is the listening point?
I write using google translator.
Greetings
Thanks for the video very nice subs love watching and weighing out info lol
Nice review! Will you be reviewing the sealed 1723 2s version as well? Im deliberating between dual Arendal 1723 2S vs SVS SB4000 vs REL1508. I am amazed at the value of the RELs but they dont have any DSP and my options in placement is limited so I need all the help I can get. So SVS & Arendal are pulling ahead...
What did you decide to go with?? I'm stuck between svs 16 ultra or this 2v
@@medic17508 I have two 1723 2s right now. Im happy with them 😀 plenty of power and honestly, I don’t use their full potential. I think that the most important feature is the app control. I would never go back to using a sub without app control. Its so critical to be able to control volume and eq to tune them well in your room when watching material that are mixed at different levels.
Honestly, i think both A2S and SvsSB16 will probably satisfy. However, if you have room and finances, I’d be considering their ported alternatives for ultimate no compromise performance. So the question is sealed or vented, not svs or arendal.
If you can go to get a demo of a vented sub vs a sealed sub you’ll know what’s right for you.
Do you currently own any subs? Or will this be your first purchase?
Since im thinking about it… given what I know today, Id probably go for dual SVS 3000 micro or smaller sealed alternatives since I do have some space constraints to deal with. If i had more space, or a dedicated room id 100% go for a vented sub. The 2s are great subs, but if you can go big, go huge 😀
I suspect you’ll be hard pressed to find a single cabinet dual sub with built in DSP, 7 filters and solid output down to 10 Hz at this price point. Impressive to say the least. The LED screen while very nice is probably unnecessary especially once you have the app
It is - until the app stops working due to lack of updates, new phone which is not supported, BT module on the sub fails or a multitude of other reasons. The LED screen is one of the reasons why I bought one of these over the B&W flagship sub, which has ZERO controls on it whatsoever - only an app that hardly works at all.
Coming from an IT background, I'm all about the redundancies though.
Thanks for the review. How would you compare them to the REL1508's? I remember the 1508's got a fair deal of praise.
The 1508 were a very quick sub but they didn't go that low.
@@therealshanelee ok I value quickness over extension. I want those Fury cannon shots to hit hard and fast/tight:)
Trying to decide between 4 x 1508's or the new carbon special to complement my two s212sx's
@@therealshanelee quicker than the Arendals?
Nice review
The lcd display is a nice touch
Have u tested it on sealed mode also then.?
For hifi, would you choose a Arendal or a REL subwoofer? Second use would be home theater
Why 2V and not 1S? I can't find any reviews for the new 1S, which I'm considering as an alternative to SVS SB3000 (both are sealed)
BTW, you can use any sub with two systems, by using the two inputs (1&2 or L&R RCA), or by the help of MiniDSP 2X4HD.
Hello
I have a question are kef ceiling speakers any good and which av receiver is good for a Atmos setup and reliable example Central channel two sides 1 subwoofer 2 rear surround and 4 height ceiling speakers channels. One more question are kef q drive speakers worth buying for home cinema setup?
Thank you
I got my 1961 i v Yesterday and it is Just as expected a very Clean and dry Punch aß i never heared. I have a humb Problem, which i will get solved tonight, After Work. With that subwoofers you can Bring your Home Cinema to a whole new level. I cant Imagine how brutal the 1723 must punch..
Is it articulate and tight enough for music?
I do believe the SVS DSP has only 3 bands while the Arendal has 7.
Shane, which one is better, the Arendal 2V or the Martin Logan BalancedForce 212? I remember you liking the BalancedForce 212 a lot more especially how it sounded with the Edge of Tomorrow intro.
Hello. SVS PB16 or this Arendal?
Can you review QB12? Qacoustics subwoofer
Hey Shane I’m a big fan of your videos. Helped me a lot with my home theatre journey.
I am making a big decision and I really needed your opinion as you have tested the Perlisten lineup as well as these Arendal subs I have my eyes on.
Compared to the Perlisten R series ( I am highly considering R215S) would these Arendal 1723 2V be just as good? The Perlistens are significantly more here in Canada (7500 before taxes for the R215S) or I can get the 1723 2V for $5000 CAD.
You have also recently tested the r210s. How are those compared to the Arendal?
Right now I have a single SVS PB2000 pro and I’m craving that low frequency feel to the body and pressurization.
I would really appreciate your opinion!
The Perlisten would be the next evolution of Arendal.
@@therealshanelee Hey Shane, thank you for the quick response brotha!
If I could save 4-5gs would you recommend the Arendal 1723 2V over the R210s or R215s?
I know the D series would be endgame but it’s way out of my budget in Canada.
My seating position is 6-7 ft away from the front stage speakers and sub and my room is 12X12.
I just don’t want to deal with that mechanical noise at low frequencies you discussed in the PSA subwoofer.
If the Arendal don’t have that issue I will definitely go with it. But if you think Perlisten R215S is worth it over Arendal then I’ll highly consider even with the price difference
Haaaaaa---lllaaaaaaa---llluujaaahhhh!! 😂😂😂love that part
To my knowledge Pb16 does not reach 10 hz / 100 db - and regarding EOT start - who cares just a stupid demo and does not tell much. I like that the 2 v you can turn display upside / down when you lean over it. Agree with the app thing that would be nice. Amazing with all the settings and filters in the amp. Could be my next sub. Thx for the review !
this or the pb16 ultra? movies only
Watched a ton of your videos trying to determine the best sub for home theater....so which sub would YOU get (cost not being a factor)? I have Bowers&Wilkins 703 S2 towers, HTM 71 S2 center (Polk Fxi A6 Sides and Rears) powered by Marantz SR7011.
Are the 703 s2 worth the 6k ask price?
@@XenogearsPS not when compared to the 1723 THX towers
What kind of control system do you use Shane? I did see some kind of tablet in the background
Its an iPad.
@@therealshanelee What control system doe you use? Or is it only the vnc app for the Trinnov?
You are correct.
Question, running Paradigm monitor (the newest and very inexpensive) was looking at a Dynaudio (maybe evoke, but ouch with the price!) then I saw this and looked at the 1961 series( both brands I would get all speakers for 5.1.2,but dyn doesn't have height so just 5.0 then rel sub with dyn) . (here's the Q) from listening yourself would you mind giving me an opinion on best for the money upgrade? (also have a NAD 758 for receiver) thanks! #brokeaudiophile 🤣🤣😢
There's no "always on" mode?
There doesn't seem to be unless it's hidden. 60 mins should be more than sufficient though.
Never waited for my 1v to turn on. Not like klipsch which I had a lot of amp issues with.
That's almost as big as my new sub. Mine is 24x24x23. With a 15" driver and a 900 watt rms amp. 1800 watt peak wattage.
nice subwoofer. by the way, you should review JL audio subwoofer, Gotham, Fathom or E sub.
how much sub du "need", to get that body punch, in a medium room?
These will do the job.
I have one of these in a 40 square meter room (regular living room), and it delivers a good amount of chest slam.
No offense to Shane but I think the 'single digit' infrasonics bit is just incorrect. The REW of the PB16s and from what we know of the PB16s, they fall of a cliff at 15hz. And Shane's REW attests to that. Whatever infrasonics shane is feeling from the PB16 (and not the Arendals) I don't think is to do with anything single digit because the PB16s just aren't that kind of speaker.
I wonder how the 1V will compare to the 2V. The 2V is awesome but the placement flexibility due to having to accomdate TWO drivers is a pain in the butt...
Room modes play a role. You should know this.
@@therealshanelee Thanks Shane. I'll do some googling as I don't know this so I'm probably being a bit of a dumbass. :(
@@therealshanelee BTW Shane, do you know if in sealed mode, the subs don't drop as severely re: sub
@@aoaaron6166 I still think they will drop off fast below 10 Hz due to their built in filter. The fast drop off below 10 Hz is because the filter is set like that.
@@user-fq5uw4uj2u Correct. Arendal support told me the infrasonic filter is set at 10hz from the factory, to avoid instabilities in the power supply.
do u prefere the svs pb 2000 or the arendal?
Arendal is easily the better sub.
Arendal vs JL ?...if this is just going to shake the walls and irratate neighbors then perhap JL is better and more musical?
With sub is best arendal or SUV pb 16 ultra
Wow. What subwoofer *can* handle the single digit infrasonic scene in Edge of Tomorrow?!? I've seen several reviews of otherwise great subs, and you say they all can't handle it.
Huge JTR, PSA, Deepsea etc. Can do it properly. the intro scene asks atleast 115db clean output at 10hz at reference levels it should make you feel almost dizzy.
Who cares about that little intro - no other movie have that demand. Monument scene in olympus has fallen is way more important. This 10 hz thing is just a test tone and not an actual sound effect. Btw the svs pb 16 ultras does not hit 10 hz and if so way down the db range. Look at meassurements found out there like audioholics !
so if the subwoofers are opposed, they will automatically have an isobaric loading with one moving out while the other is moving in (flipped polarity for one of the drivers), as far as i know and remember, there isn't ANY isobaric subwoofers which are ported and will just mess everything up. This is only my knowledge tho so maybe someone can help me answer this question.
No
They are not running isobaric loading. If they where they would cancel each other out in that configuration.
@@kevinwest1607 i have done more research and found that you CAN run isobaric loading using ports. If you run a subwoofer back to back like this subwoofer then it would probably be a no brainer to flip the second driver's polarity making it a isobaric loaded subwoofer. There are a lot of isobaric loaded subwoofer like these magnet to magnet isobaric loaded subwoofer like the devialet phantom, PSA dual sealed series and a lot more. but so far i have found none to have a port which makes this sub really interesting.
Awesome set of Speakers ... and great introduction of those speakers
Do u think the 2v sound signature are better because the port is at the back not the front ? ,Compare to the SVS 16. have tried the sb 3000s in comparison , as they are sealed what would u compare the 2v to them ?
its probably the better dynamics which arendal explain in their interview with shane. the dua opposing drivers will definitely improve the tightness in bass and minimise cabinet movement.
why are u comparing a sealed to a vented sub? the arendals are going to (in vented mode) have a lot more output. I'd assume as its bigger in cabniet size alone.. its going to out-do the sb 3000 comfortably even in sealed mode.
All I can say is wow! Be blessed spare change 🙏
For anyone in the US buying these remember to tack on ~10% for customs
At least
Now i got buyers remorse with my arendal 1.5🤣 great company
Best klipsch
Comparing the graphs of these to the KEF KF92's response in your room from that review shows that the KEF's measure much better. In terms of real world performance though, how big of a difference do you find with these being massive ported boxes compared to the small sealed KEF's?
These have way more headroom.
I was told that at the Yonkers store on central ave
hiiii..... iam indian......
ur presentation very well
Seriously are you some family of Tiger Woods?
and zero acoustic soundproofing? this is not serious ...
What kind of nonsense comment is this? Maybe pay attention to what your watching next time.
@@therealshanelee I watched other videos, yes you have some, sorry. you did an acoustic study could you just laid according to thx recommendations?
@@therealshanelee PS: have you thought about testing JBL pro speakers? they are inexpensive and have high sensitivity, which has the advantage of not needing powerful and expensive amplifiers.
First
Important ?