No Offense is a provocative short film that tackles the perilous intersection of art, politics, and free speech. Using humour to underscore the absurdity of political free speech and repression, the film's director, Kris Borghs doesn't shy from the controversial nature of his subject matter. Instead, he embraces it, challenging his audience to consider the boundaries of artistic freedom. *What did you think?*
No Offens Is Just an Funny Short Film,They Have The Artstyle Of South Park But More Smouth And Cartoony!I Love It!But It's Funny,❤but What The Heck is Hitler Doing Here???😂
"The same way they manipulate us into buying toothpaste, car wax, even politicians. All prepackaged, the least offensive, most appealing alternative; But its precisely when humor is offensive that we need it most. Comedy should provoke, it should blast through prejudices, challenge preconceptions; Comedy should always leave you different then when it found ya. Sure Humor can hurt, even alienate, but the risk is better than the alternative. A steady diet of innocuous, childproof, flavorless mush. Demand to be challenged, to be offended, to be treated like thinking, reasoning adults; And raise your children to be the same. Don't let a comedian, a network, a congressional committee, or an evil genius take away your freedom to laugh at WHATEVER you want." - Duckman
Another layer to this is that it’s impossible for an artist to please everyone. No matter what the subject matter is, someone is bound to take offense to it in some way.
I mean… I guess. But this feels like it was made *to* offend, and then point at any objectors like “I told you so!” It feels more like a gotcha than anything else, basically
Beautiful film. This is not just about censorship, it’s how you can’t please everyone all of the time. Someone, somewhere is going to be offended or dislike your work. If we ran the world by this basis, art would be so straight and narrow it could hardly be called creative.
this just shows how big figures just took down whoever made them look bad and i cant even say "back then" because this still happens edit : this is a note for the uploader did this video have any guest animators? Because i recognised the animation style of some other animators
@@megatonradiolive There is a..giant difference thought. One you need to provoke PURPOSEFULLY for them to get angry at you even then they will not kill you or whatever. But now compared to the Entire USA and..well what it is. They will make you go missing. (cia)
@@mrfoxly6833 Maybe so, but if that happened it would probably muddle the point about how artists always get chastised for drawing whatever offended them.
There's so many layers to this film and so many ways one can interpret it. The different styles of each and every character really drives this point home.
The way I interpreted it, he ruined his cartoon drawing by attempting to draw everyone that was judging him. "Offend everyone so that it offends nobody"
there is a clear message though let art and entertainment be fucking free if it offends feminists good if it offends nazis good if it offends jews good if it offends blacks good if it offends christians good if it offends asians good etc etc etc art is meant to explore many things, let's stop putting limits to it just because it's offensive, immoral or whatever excuse is used for current day puritanism and censorship STOP!!!
@@libertyprime1614what are you talking about? His paintings were great, I'd also be mad if I get rejected by the art institute despite my good efforts 😅
It bothers me that they write in the comments that the style is the same as that of South Park, they are not similar and the truth is that you managed to distinguish yourself with your own, cartoonish style, congratulations, I loved the movement, the expressions of the characters and the general representation of ideologies and political leaders. The best moment 2:56
@@phoenixwhiler943 here's how you see you fell for US and European propaganda but do you really believe all those lies? and then it made it like this in hell that it guaranteed better healthcare and education in the world and that tourism increased dramatically and etc. many people have been to Cuba and some of those people told me the opposite of what you you said. so therefore do not believe Western propaganda because Western propaganda does not tell the truth.
well I mean if you only depict others through your words as the people in the short depict others in their paintings... Yeah understandably you're gonna piss a lot of people off
@@Radbug11 i dont understand your problem with Christians but yes you can say many things that is bad to us I know your sarcastic though But we can stand up for our beliefs Whether you like it or not , doesn't matter. God bless you and enjoy your day/night
It´s a famous logic paradox, If X is everything, X is nothing. If everything is racist, racism is diluted in its definition until it becomes extinct. @@real.jimmy23
i think its funny how this is getting praised for being so unbiased but at the same time saying stuff like "this is just like *ideology i don't like* and cancel culture!!!" missing the whole point
I think you're missing the point, i think the short is taking at jab at world leaders who take offense at art. I think if im not mistaken this shirt came to existance because there was actually an artist murdered because of this.
I like how much the protagonist fights to survive and how it works off of or leads onto some side effects. Like him almost being able to grab the pencil due to the pile created, or him knocking the three others into a group by pulling against the rope he was on, leading to them getting charred together and projecting the embers into the air that he ends up catching. This all of course doesn't stop the inevitability of his art being criticized by the jury, but it makes it more rewarding to see him make it through his struggle, of course until he didn't, lol.
Anyways, here a brownie recipe. Ingredients: - 1 cup unsalted butter - 2 cups granulated sugar - 4 large eggs - 1 teaspoon vanilla extract - 1/2 cup all-purpose flour - 1/2 cup cocoa powder - 1/4 teaspoon salt - 1 cup chopped nuts or chocolate chips (optional) Instructions: 1. Preheat oven to 350°F (175°C) and grease a baking pan. 2. Melt 1 cup butter, mix with 2 cups sugar. 3. Add 4 eggs and 1 tsp vanilla; mix well. 4. Sift in 1/2 cup flour, 1/2 cup cocoa, and 1/4 tsp salt; stir. 5. Optional: add 1 cup nuts or chocolate chips. 6. Pour into the pan, bake for 25-30 mins. 7. Cool completely, cut into squares, and enjoy vour brownies!
i think the message of the animated short would be demonstrated better if the artists' drawings weren't blatantly offensive caricatures, but rather seemingly normal art that offended a judge by a minor detail. right now it just looks like they're trying to offend literally everybody, rather than, well, not. maybe the jab at the inspiration of this cartoon is more important, what do i know.
Yeah, I know it's a cartoon but it just doesn't make sense to me why the artist all chose to make offensive art when they knew they'd get killed from it.
@@Me-wx1mt Like im not even centrist but like i think had a grasp what the short is trying say. Is not obviously some kind of underrated masterpiece or something like that, not trying to say that.
Agreed. Because ya know, a twitter feminist telling you to shut up is the same as hitler killing you because he disagrees. Heres a profound statement for everyone. If you dont wanna make offensive art shut up. Or own your niche and move forward. As long as you dont live in a country with an actual dictator, all the other people on the panel cant hurt you. It was a stupid short film. "Everyone censors things they dont like" wow really? I didnt pick that up in my 25 years of life. I was busy hiding under a rock.
the most obvious and milk toast view on this film is that no matter what you do or what idea you show, that there is always someone whos offended or disagree with you the only thing close to being non offensive is literally just black scribble of nothing, until the executioner shows that its offended aswell
It really is a 'pen is mightier than the sword' world out there. It's amazing what people get offended by, especially when they have an image to uphold. And the people are gonna poke fun the way people do, artists are just fantastic translators of that. It's wild how someone in that much power can feel so threatened by literal marks on paper.
Wow for once youtube recommended me an unexpected perfect gem. Im astounded, I actually watching this animation and agree with its message, its simple yet also multi dimensionsal. It does not make one paint nor paint a black or white picture which is rare for modern media. The comedy of it also at the end showing how the art piece offended the ecutioner shows how art is inherently offensive. All real art is offensive, in some way or form, it will be pffensive somehow and this anomation shows how it does not inherently also have to be a large political idealogy with the last bit. Great unexpected gem, great work.
Because the people and the drawings of them represent ideas not a literal person themselves. I think the creator chose Christianity, as in the last 30-40 years, in the west, mocking Christianity has been more and more acceptable. (As it should be). The figure of the pope waking up, represents that, in the future, this might not be okay. Showing that artists which try to cater to trends and bandwagons to avoid offense, never win out in the end as years later, their works may be offensive once again.
Brilliant animation, it's really great, it's impossible not to say or create something that wouldn't offend someone. Everyone is so interrupted... and in the street one of them is the wolf of another and somehow they don't go to court or punch each other in the face. Once again, great animation, great message. 10/10 +1
"Everyone is so interrupted... and in the street one of them is the wolf of another and somehow they don't go to court or punch each other in the face." If you write, save that one. That's it. That's us. That's humanity.
Ali Farzat, he had his hands broken for drawing the president of Syria, it is a film in honor of him. How about recognizing that the message is powerful?
Ironic. Someone made a silly little film about offending people, and people get offended. You call it surface level, but apperently, it was still too deep for you.
There's nothing you can do to stop other people from being offended by what you do, but you don't get to use that as an excuse if you deliberately cause offense by attacking people less fortunate than you.
Judging by the most of judges being dictators/extremists/leaders and the art being caricatures I think the short is less about everything being offensive and "cancel culture bad" and more about radical groups and leaders reacting to satire/critique extremely harshly to the point of severe real life consequences
@@idcallname8410 There's no such thing as "cancel culture". That's just a made up term to demonize the freedom of association and to whine about about being called out for being a terrible person. The argument you're giving has in my experience invariably come from people who think that "Blazing Saddles can't be done today" such an argument is woefully mistaken. Satire like Blazing Saddles works even today, but it's because of what it's satirizing. Its racist jokes didn't satirize people who think "racism bad", it satirized people who make those very jokes. Blazing Saddles was, to use modern parlance, "punching up". What gets "canceled" is punching down. In short, Blazing Saddles is not funny because it makes fun of black people. It makes fun of people making fun of black people by showing how stupid it is to make fun of black people. THAT is satire. You wouldn't kick a defenseless puppy, would you? If you would, you're a horrible shit stain of a person. Attacking people who are less fortunate and less privileged than you is not satire, it's bigotry and abuse. But humorously aping the power dynamic that allows and enables the imbalance of privilege in the first place to attack that very imbalance, that's what satire is.
@idcallname8410 the only thing that weirds me out is frida kahlo, what the hell did she do to deserve being put in the same likes as hitler or putin or gaddafi?
You cannot create inoffensive art, let yourself not be domesticated by fear, dominate with your art and let your emotions flow like a river, yet do not be swallowed by one emotion alone, for the water of the river comes from all walks of life.
the best word i can use to describe this video with is kitsch. it's so on the goddamn nose you can't call this "deep" or "provocative". the author literally beats your face in with the point.
I percieved that ending with all the different world leaders laughing out loud at that drawing in a sense that nobody cares about the common folk who do the work (The guy who pulled the lever in this case) if they're the ones getting ridiculed and laughed at, as long as it's not *THEM* who are getting the slack, meaning the commoners are the ones that have to defend themselves. Very interesting animated short indeed.
i have no idea what this is supposed to mean because "everyone will get offended by any art" clearly doesnt apply when the artists themselves are only capable of drawing new age caricatures of certain groups and people aimed obviously at making some sort of political statement, of course art is subjective, and that everything is art and yadda yadda but this doesnt make me feel sympathetic towards the artists, it only makes them come off as unoriginal one trick ponies
@@Atom_X. its not that censoring is okay, its that in a world where every artist is a raging political estet it would make sense why the upper crust is centered around censoring said artists, its almost as if we cant have artists that display the beauty of nature, of human imagination, why is it that artistic expressions always have to be weaponized
one thing i like most about this is how all of the convicts distinguishing features are removed before being put on trial, so some of them could've been totally in their right to make the offensive painting, but since they look like everyone else, they are convicted as if they are anyone else. it parallels the internet, because a chinese person could make an offensive chinese joke, but because of their concealed online identity, everyone acts like they are a racist for making the joke, even though it was completely fine for that person to do it.
@@Private_jinthe buttons have a lower pixel depth to the character models, I wouldn't know the exact science behind it but I'm sure lower quality images behave differently through yt compression than higher quality images
Eh, this seems so melodramatic. This stuff only really matters if you’re Trying to get content approved by all of these groups simultaneously, and who does that?? If you want to be as broad as possible, you end up being so basic because you’re relying on commonalities, which become fewer and fewer in broad groups, that’s just how it works, but also, we can all make fun content thar’s not offense. Humor doesn’t need to be centered around making someone look bad.
fr, this short doesn’t really make any sense as an analogy. like obviously if you’re making a drawing of someone as a toilet or whatever, no matter their views or ideologies, are gonna get offended
@@Me-wx1mt The point was that everything worth saying will upset someone, somewhere. Back when offending someone was not a big deal, that was ok. Now that anyone who chooses to be offended can destroy your life, it's a serious problem.
@@Xezlec i disagree fundamentally with your view on offending people, it’s not that “back in the day nobody cared” it’s that people couldn’t say racial slurs on the internet for everybody to see
@@JerryDaPlatypus i’m not pro censoring “anything worth saying” but there’s a difference between art being censored and dumbass takes being criticized. i am actively bolstering that other persons opinion by responding
This does not occur equally. Voices against certain groups do not face backlash while other's do. If you don't believe me, create two accounts saying the exact same things and chose two 'opposing' positions and see which gets banned, shadwobanned and shut down.
I really suck in commenting, and I don't know how to express my feelings at this video fully, but all I can say is that...this is very deep. Comedic, interesting, and deep. I needed a little help from the comments to see the message clearer though, but still, what a great video. And I like the animation style too. Well deserved award.
That’s kind of a misread/oversimplification of the substance tho. It’s not just about offensiveness but the power structures around art and the sensibilities of different groups.
@@shroomer8294 Its only a term used by the most infuriating sociologists. Just because they have a degree in sociology doesn’t give them the power to change the definition of a word so that it can post hoc justify their preconceptions. Racism is prejudice based on race or ethnicity- simple as.
god its so insane how nothing of substance is said here at all other than "censorship bad" which like woah great you read fahrenheit 451 in high school and only got the most surface level understanding of it good job no wonder every comment sounds like it was left by a middle schooler who thinks the hunger games is subversive i cant tell who every person is supposed to be but i think it would really help your point if they werent half just really racist caricatures
I'm all down for political satire but how is it not childish to compare people who have risked their lives in the past for drawing cartoons mocking ruthless dictators (Hitler, Castro), to....feminists? Minorities? Wow, so deep and brave for doing so. I'm not even offended, it's just a cringe take; more so to have been gifted an award. Looks like someone spent too much time in /r/edgy
@@ImpartialDawnthere's no point in interacting with a troll but still. What's the point then? Enlighten me since I'm such an unstable person. Specifically what do you want to rebuke in the argument I made?
@@PeterStrings hi peter, if i was a coward i would say that theres no point in trying to have a good faith conversation with someone who is using your tactic of painting me as a troll in advance, to give an excuse to run away if you fail to win in a fair debate that being said, im not a coward and would be happy to debate you in order to do this i think it would be helpful if you could define what exactly your argument is, such that i will be in a position to judge it. as it stands, i cannot find any argument in your original comment - only grammatically indecipherable whining about the inclusion of feminism and minorities in this video
Responding to my comment by calling me out as having "low emotional stability" is texbook definition of being a troll on the internet. I post my concern, and you simply join the conversation to insult me, instead of explaining what I got wrong. So I don't care if you get offended by calling you a troll. Brushing off my comment as "grammatically incoherent" surely makes you look like a reasonable person. Starting off with an ad hominem argument. Secondly, the argument is pretty simple. Putting feminism on par with political satire against dictators is just bad faith. Offending tyrannical political figures that got into positions of power by claiming to be omnipotent figures, is something that should be encouraged. That's punching up. Writing offensive content against minorities or discriminated groups is clearly punching down. No matter how loud any radical feminist screams on twitter, they are not going to get you hanged or executed and dropped in a ditch, like Hitler or Casto would have. Having them side by side is a low effort comparison to make, and brushes off excluded groups that get offended when they are prejudiced. Like, let's say for instance, having exaggerated big lips in a black person caricature, or crooked teeth in the asian guy. Those are just outdated stereotypes that shouldn't be encouraged. There's a lot of people out there that we can make fun of, people in positions of power. It's stupid to consider that offending minority groups is as brave as writing cartoons of Hitler sucking dick
But what you will do? What power should you possess over them? This is about censorship, not just about people being offended, the film is clear about it by depicting literal executions.
That too cuz like…just draw something that’s not inherently offensive and boom you won’t get ‘killed’😭that jst irked me since it’s such a simple solution, no matter what message they’re trying to portray
wtf r you talking about, hes saying if you say something offensive, dont target specific groups, you have make fun of everyone equally so you dont seem fucking racist towards a group, if you make fun of everyone, then you arent targetting a specific group duh.@@kelp7060
Even if it isn't offensive, someone will find it offensive, for f*ck sake people were offended over that McDonald’s commercial that depicted a wholesome family.
the art has little to nothing to do with south park's. that being said, this animation has such an eye-catching and appealing style which is mixed wonderfully with the non-verbal interactions between the characters. short and sweet. the message is simple but meaningful.
Amazing animation, I love how you included the South Park animation style while sharing message through it, great work. I was expecting an other alternative, like the painter making fun of himself, so he would have drawn his face, but this unexpected ending is way funnier. Nowadays you can only make fun of yourself so people won't blame you.
I like how the artist chose to portray an anonymous woman in a Burqa instead of an actual Islamic figure. Shows the hypocrisy in the artist's willingness to be truly "edgy." 2/10, reminded me of South Park. Enjoy the cute little award you got.
The person who made this is claiming to be an advocate of free speech, bust seeing a lot of the extras he added in, I'm pretty sure "Free speech" means saying racial slurs in public without social repercussion.
No Offense is a provocative short film that tackles the perilous intersection of art, politics, and free speech. Using humour to underscore the absurdity of political free speech and repression, the film's director, Kris Borghs doesn't shy from the controversial nature of his subject matter.
Instead, he embraces it, challenging his audience to consider the boundaries of artistic freedom.
*What did you think?*
I think that you shouldn’t have used AI to make that entire paragraph.
I think its nice
This isn't even offensive this this is pretty informative
(But we know, we know ai that you wrote this)
No Offens Is Just an Funny Short Film,They Have The Artstyle Of South Park But More Smouth And Cartoony!I Love It!But It's Funny,❤but What The Heck is Hitler Doing Here???😂
"The same way they manipulate us into buying toothpaste, car wax, even politicians. All prepackaged, the least offensive, most appealing alternative; But its precisely when humor is offensive that we need it most. Comedy should provoke, it should blast through prejudices, challenge preconceptions; Comedy should always leave you different then when it found ya. Sure Humor can hurt, even alienate, but the risk is better than the alternative. A steady diet of innocuous, childproof, flavorless mush. Demand to be challenged, to be offended, to be treated like thinking, reasoning adults; And raise your children to be the same. Don't let a comedian, a network, a congressional committee, or an evil genius take away your freedom to laugh at WHATEVER you want."
- Duckman
I like how hitler is being calmed down by ... His worst enemies
his victims would be way more accurate
I was just about to say that, patted by a Jew
Now that's downright ironic
@@oliverschlesinger6744more like students
@@robertdingle1129only accurate if bibi was sitting there.
Another layer to this is that it’s impossible for an artist to please everyone.
No matter what the subject matter is, someone is bound to take offense to it in some way.
NO, ITS COMPLETELY POSSIBLE TO PLEASE EVERYONE. NOW YOU MADE ME FEEL OFFENDED NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Or being laughed at by others for not being artistic enough
The best audience a artist should please is themselves.
I mean… I guess. But this feels like it was made *to* offend, and then point at any objectors like “I told you so!”
It feels more like a gotcha than anything else, basically
I love that the characters of the jury are square-shaped, symbolizing how close-minded they're, while all the artists are round.
Es como de South Park
Oh nice insight
what about the chines ?
But most artists are pretty close minded into surrealism
@@lastekahwhat chines
Beautiful film. This is not just about censorship, it’s how you can’t please everyone all of the time. Someone, somewhere is going to be offended or dislike your work. If we ran the world by this basis, art would be so straight and narrow it could hardly be called creative.
Cool, bring back all the confederate statues.
@@imperialhistorian4201they were racists
@@Cherno35 ladies and gentlemen, the censorship.
@@imperialhistorian4201 they fought to enslave people.
In the end, it is about censorship, otherwise the film wouldn't depict the punishment for offensive art, just people being offended.
I love how they used south park art style but with more smooth and cartoony. Funny short film i ever watch.
Thank you!
Hi
I was literally thinking the same thing!
More like inspired by South Park. I think it's the eyeballs in particular that made us collectively come to that observation.
It doesn’t look like South Park at all.
I appreciate the fact that the protatonist, instead of getting a haircut at the beggining, got his boxers removed
I love that one of the judges is a nameless biker, but the ending just killed me
Thats the hells angels president i think,if you look closely on his hat you can read hells angels thats a famous biker gang
It killed him too
@@lawbymorgan TIL Hell's Angels doesn't have an official president, but does have a de facto "national" president for public relations.
@@Delcat42who is dead
@@Certified_Dude And TODAY IL...
o7 may he ride the endless dust
this just shows how big figures just took down whoever made them look bad
and i cant even say "back then" because this still happens
edit : this is a note for the uploader
did this video have any guest animators? Because i recognised the animation style of some other animators
that's why there's representatives of "USA" or "Femen", it's still going on
Worlds biggest lie is that society is built on anything but violence
@@megatonradiolive There is a..giant difference thought. One you need to provoke PURPOSEFULLY for them to get angry at you even then they will not kill you or whatever. But now compared to the Entire USA and..well what it is. They will make you go missing. (cia)
No shit 💀
yes, but Gaddafi wasn't bad and neither was Fidel Castro.
and neither is Putin.
RUclips just held me at gunpoint to watch this short...
Honestly it would be more realistic if the jury belittled each other for what offended them and they started fighting amongst themselves.
The message would have been lost if that happened.
@@dioshiba6066 I don't know about that. It would show how hypocritical their scrutiny was.
@@mrfoxly6833 Maybe so, but if that happened it would probably muddle the point about how artists always get chastised for drawing whatever offended them.
@@dioshiba6066I did not get that message _at all_
@@DeathnoteBB Then you must have poor interpretation skills.
There's so many layers to this film and so many ways one can interpret it.
The different styles of each and every character really drives this point home.
The way I interpreted it, he ruined his cartoon drawing by attempting to draw everyone that was judging him. "Offend everyone so that it offends nobody"
@@averagejoe8358 The good old South Park strat!
@@averagejoe8358 wrong. funny man draw funny things. that is the correct and only interpretation
there is a clear message though
let art and entertainment be fucking free
if it offends feminists good
if it offends nazis good
if it offends jews good
if it offends blacks good
if it offends christians good
if it offends asians good
etc
etc
etc
art is meant to explore many things, let's stop putting limits to it just because it's offensive, immoral or whatever excuse is used for current day puritanism and censorship
STOP!!!
2:47
"NEIN,NEIN,NEIN,NEIN,NEIN!"
- Famous words said by a Austrian painter who failed at painting
He is offended because his paintings were never that good, obviously. 😑
@@libertyprime1614 ???
@@libertyprime1614what are you talking about? His paintings were great, I'd also be mad if I get rejected by the art institute despite my good efforts 😅
@@Zim5.0 Yes, indeed a good reason to start a war.
@@libertyprime1614o
It bothers me that they write in the comments that the style is the same as that of South Park, they are not similar and the truth is that you managed to distinguish yourself with your own, cartoonish style, congratulations, I loved the movement, the expressions of the characters and the general representation of ideologies and political leaders.
The best moment 2:56
fortunately not all ideologies are bad like Hitler and then Gaddafi and Castro did good and were against Hitler.
And Putin isn't bad either.
@@gabrielsalvemini7489 bro you ain't just slipping that last comment there-
@@Alecations but what are you talking about, I'm not letting anything slip and I only told the truth.
@@gabrielsalvemini7489castro did good? How? Making a beautiful tourist flourishing country into a hellscape shithole?
@@phoenixwhiler943 here's how you see you fell for US and European propaganda but do you really believe all those lies?
and then it made it like this in hell that it guaranteed better healthcare and education in the world and that tourism increased dramatically and etc. many people have been to Cuba and some of those people told me the opposite of what you you said.
so therefore do not believe Western propaganda because Western propaganda does not tell the truth.
Moral of the story, you can’t please everyone, there will always be someone that gets offended by whatever you do or say.
well I mean if you only depict others through your words as the people in the short depict others in their paintings... Yeah understandably you're gonna piss a lot of people off
Yeah
But if you say the truth then you should not be afraid if people get angry
then hi
Except christians of course. There is no offense in insulting them, just like animation said ;)
@@Radbug11 i dont understand your problem with Christians but yes you can say many things that is bad to us
I know your sarcastic though
But we can stand up for our beliefs
Whether you like it or not , doesn't matter.
God bless you and enjoy your day/night
That was so simple and yet so engaging. Great work Short Frame
Glad you liked it!
blud offended
Incredible that he lands here
Wsg offendingeverybody
who else but offendingeverybody to watch this video 💀💀
"if everyone is racist, no one is"
- Syndrome
what
that's the vibe I feel when watching this
It´s a famous logic paradox, If X is everything, X is nothing.
If everything is racist, racism is diluted in its definition until it becomes extinct.
@@real.jimmy23
damn@@javins5595
Actually is "If everyone is super, no one is"
-🤓
Love how the jew comforted Hitler 😆
Israel be like
Rabbi pro palestine be like
ADL be to Elon Musk like
@@glogervraverage Palestinian supporter mindset
@@Krillshelfing ?
3:50 The only one who made it out alive.
By pure luck
i think its funny how this is getting praised for being so unbiased but at the same time saying stuff like "this is just like *ideology i don't like* and cancel culture!!!" missing the whole point
I think you're missing the point, i think the short is taking at jab at world leaders who take offense at art. I think if im not mistaken this shirt came to existance because there was actually an artist murdered because of this.
I like how much the protagonist fights to survive and how it works off of or leads onto some side effects. Like him almost being able to grab the pencil due to the pile created, or him knocking the three others into a group by pulling against the rope he was on, leading to them getting charred together and projecting the embers into the air that he ends up catching. This all of course doesn't stop the inevitability of his art being criticized by the jury, but it makes it more rewarding to see him make it through his struggle, of course until he didn't, lol.
Anyways, here a brownie recipe.
Ingredients:
- 1 cup unsalted butter
- 2 cups granulated sugar
- 4 large eggs
- 1 teaspoon vanilla extract
- 1/2 cup all-purpose flour
- 1/2 cup cocoa powder
- 1/4 teaspoon salt
- 1 cup chopped nuts or chocolate chips (optional)
Instructions:
1. Preheat oven to 350°F (175°C) and grease a baking pan.
2. Melt 1 cup butter, mix with 2 cups sugar.
3. Add 4 eggs and 1 tsp vanilla; mix well.
4. Sift in 1/2 cup flour, 1/2 cup cocoa, and 1/4 tsp salt; stir.
5. Optional: add 1 cup nuts or chocolate chips.
6. Pour into the pan, bake for 25-30 mins.
7. Cool completely, cut into squares, and enjoy vour brownies!
It totally agrees with the theme of the video
instructions unclear, made meth.
thank you silly spider, very cool
Thanks dude!
Random=funny!
Hitler is not happy to see this😂 2:42
Honestly, I think the most clever and realistic twist would've been if he had to draw himself at the end
2:56 i need context. a lot of context.
why
@@RandomYIRPhitler hated both nationalities of the two people next to him so its weird
@vortex_20w
18 what's the nationality on the right
I don’t think they need that happening again
@@chees4407African
i think the message of the animated short would be demonstrated better if the artists' drawings weren't blatantly offensive caricatures, but rather seemingly normal art that offended a judge by a minor detail. right now it just looks like they're trying to offend literally everybody, rather than, well, not. maybe the jab at the inspiration of this cartoon is more important, what do i know.
Yeah, I know it's a cartoon but it just doesn't make sense to me why the artist all chose to make offensive art when they knew they'd get killed from it.
@@portugeese_man_o_war i think it's because of the inspiration where politicians just can't take a joke. read description
Maybe that's the point? Ever see Ralph Bakshi's cartoons? They use the same idea
I mean to be fair most of the world leaders already look like blatant racist caricatures so that’d probably wouldn’t matter as a nitpick at all.
I’m so glad they decided to animate the centrist political meme my dementia ridden grandfather would send me from Facebook.
😭 like seriously how did this win awards
this ain’t about left or right dude
@@se.224 how enlightened
@@Me-wx1mt Like im not even centrist but like i think had a grasp what the short is trying say. Is not obviously some kind of underrated masterpiece or something like that, not trying to say that.
Agreed. Because ya know, a twitter feminist telling you to shut up is the same as hitler killing you because he disagrees.
Heres a profound statement for everyone. If you dont wanna make offensive art shut up. Or own your niche and move forward.
As long as you dont live in a country with an actual dictator, all the other people on the panel cant hurt you.
It was a stupid short film. "Everyone censors things they dont like" wow really? I didnt pick that up in my 25 years of life. I was busy hiding under a rock.
the most obvious and milk toast view on this film is that no matter what you do or what idea you show, that there is always someone whos offended or disagree with you
the only thing close to being non offensive is literally just black scribble of nothing, until the executioner shows that its offended aswell
Bone apple tea 😘👌
@@JoshWitte I prefer Bone Hurting Juice. But I'll not Milque the joke...
wow, you watched it to???
@@joeldejonge2986 thats the point of my comment yes
@@gravityshark580 Do go on
It really is a 'pen is mightier than the sword' world out there. It's amazing what people get offended by, especially when they have an image to uphold. And the people are gonna poke fun the way people do, artists are just fantastic translators of that. It's wild how someone in that much power can feel so threatened by literal marks on paper.
This is very… European
How the hell did a guy with 900k subs get ignored in a comment section.
@@SaberSin-mu4kt hope this doesn't outreach so that RUclips doesn't get another drama 😭
But Fidel Castro is there!
and I think I saw Kim Jong Ill there too!
@@SaberSin-mu4kt I was about to say the same thing
@@pikachuthebananasplit9061 I think he means more in spirit and how it paints political correctness
The award this film won was well deserved.
Why is this lowkey good and also 2:47 hilarious lol
2:48
Most calm Hitler moment
😲
NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN 🤬
How did this win any awards? I want to see what this went up against.
2:47 The way bro jumped up and down had me 💀💀💀
Because he got been piss off by people
That is how I would react when summer is over and I have to go back to school
My take-away is that it doesn't matter who is in power, the ones who pay are always the artists.
why would a communist be offended by a caricature of putin?
Because Putin is trying to reunite USSR by any means
@@хип-хоп-канал yeah a catholic nationalist wants to remake the ussr
@@хип-хоп-канал youre not very smart are you
@@хип-хоп-каналlmao. No.
I think it's supposed to represent Russians in general
Wow for once youtube recommended me an unexpected perfect gem. Im astounded, I actually watching this animation and agree with its message, its simple yet also multi dimensionsal. It does not make one paint nor paint a black or white picture which is rare for modern media. The comedy of it also at the end showing how the art piece offended the ecutioner shows how art is inherently offensive. All real art is offensive, in some way or form, it will be pffensive somehow and this anomation shows how it does not inherently also have to be a large political idealogy with the last bit. Great unexpected gem, great work.
So glad you enjoyed it!
Hilter is mewmaxxing
Nzimaxing
Posting harmless fanart on Twitter be like:
this offends me! *proceeds to leak IP address*
harmless fanart you said
4:04 why would he decide to slander another huge figure instead of drawing something else?
its desperation not accusation
and also maybe there the only huge figures in the world
Cause the Pope was asleep. But still he could of just drawn a cat or something
Because the people and the drawings of them represent ideas not a literal person themselves. I think the creator chose Christianity, as in the last 30-40 years, in the west, mocking Christianity has been more and more acceptable. (As it should be). The figure of the pope waking up, represents that, in the future, this might not be okay. Showing that artists which try to cater to trends and bandwagons to avoid offense, never win out in the end as years later, their works may be offensive once again.
@@portugeese_man_o_war offensive to cats
Brilliant animation, it's really great, it's impossible not to say or create something that wouldn't offend someone. Everyone is so interrupted... and in the street one of them is the wolf of another and somehow they don't go to court or punch each other in the face. Once again, great animation, great message. 10/10 +1
"Everyone is so interrupted... and in the street one of them is the wolf of another and somehow they don't go to court or punch each other in the face."
If you write, save that one. That's it. That's us. That's humanity.
What award did this win, the most surface level criticism award?
Ali Farzat, he had his hands broken for drawing the president of Syria, it is a film in honor of him. How about recognizing that the message is powerful?
@@wastely Ali farzats message was powerful, not this film though
fr this is ridiculous
@@wastelywhere does it say it is honoring him specifically? and if this is how they *honor* him i’d hate to see how they dishonor him.
Ironic. Someone made a silly little film about offending people, and people get offended. You call it surface level, but apperently, it was still too deep for you.
This aint south park this is north playground 💀
fr 💀💀
WE GOING DOWN THE SOUTH PARK WITH THIS ONE 🗣️🗣️🔥🔥
5:42 he could’ve walked away
That’s so messed up 5:46
Does thst mean he was beaten up?
There's nothing you can do to stop other people from being offended by what you do, but you don't get to use that as an excuse if you deliberately cause offense by attacking people less fortunate than you.
Judging by the most of judges being dictators/extremists/leaders and the art being caricatures I think the short is less about everything being offensive and "cancel culture bad" and more about radical groups and leaders reacting to satire/critique extremely harshly to the point of severe real life consequences
@@idcallname8410 There's no such thing as "cancel culture". That's just a made up term to demonize the freedom of association and to whine about about being called out for being a terrible person.
The argument you're giving has in my experience invariably come from people who think that "Blazing Saddles can't be done today" such an argument is woefully mistaken. Satire like Blazing Saddles works even today, but it's because of what it's satirizing. Its racist jokes didn't satirize people who think "racism bad", it satirized people who make those very jokes. Blazing Saddles was, to use modern parlance, "punching up". What gets "canceled" is punching down.
In short, Blazing Saddles is not funny because it makes fun of black people. It makes fun of people making fun of black people by showing how stupid it is to make fun of black people. THAT is satire.
You wouldn't kick a defenseless puppy, would you? If you would, you're a horrible shit stain of a person. Attacking people who are less fortunate and less privileged than you is not satire, it's bigotry and abuse. But humorously aping the power dynamic that allows and enables the imbalance of privilege in the first place to attack that very imbalance, that's what satire is.
@idcallname8410 the only thing that weirds me out is frida kahlo, what the hell did she do to deserve being put in the same likes as hitler or putin or gaddafi?
You cannot create inoffensive art, let yourself not be domesticated by fear, dominate with your art and let your emotions flow like a river, yet do not be swallowed by one emotion alone, for the water of the river comes from all walks of life.
what?
Hell'a good irony. I think this picture will stay forever in our lifes until people start thinking twice.
I wonder if that day will ever come.
babes have you never seen the fugly political caricature fandom before or something this is a wild comment. aint nobody remembering this
2:56 the two groups who shouldnt be comforting the nazi lol
The most cursed trio I ever seen in media.
Uhuh.
Let me just make a new cartoon just for you. So you don't have to actually think about what you're saying.
What's the group on the right
@@anomonyousUntil you discover he made this comment ironically
Same with the Pope comforted by feminists and Muslims.
the best word i can use to describe this video with is kitsch. it's so on the goddamn nose you can't call this "deep" or "provocative". the author literally beats your face in with the point.
Agree
2:48 me when I mess up my drawing:
NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEINN 🗣🗣🗣🗣💯💯🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💥💥💥‼️‼️
I thought this was a South Park animation for a minute, it was too smooth to be one
I percieved that ending with all the different world leaders laughing out loud at that drawing in a sense that nobody cares about the common folk who do the work (The guy who pulled the lever in this case) if they're the ones getting ridiculed and laughed at, as long as it's not *THEM* who are getting the slack, meaning the commoners are the ones that have to defend themselves. Very interesting animated short indeed.
This was honestly, kinda dumb. Like the message was on par with the “cellphone bad” cartoon.
Finally a satirical film that makes fun of everyone, both left and right.
Nice short, I'm glad it is award winners.
THE BEST THING I've seen on a LOOOOONG time on YT ! BRAVO !
They deserved this award 🏆
Well, it got one.
If South Park makes this canon then it is
Real
i have no idea what this is supposed to mean because "everyone will get offended by any art" clearly doesnt apply when the artists themselves are only capable of drawing new age caricatures of certain groups and people aimed obviously at making some sort of political statement, of course art is subjective, and that everything is art and yadda yadda but this doesnt make me feel sympathetic towards the artists, it only makes them come off as unoriginal one trick ponies
And? Does that make censoring them OK? Bad art, just like bad words, is part of free expression/speech...
@@Atom_X. its not that censoring is okay, its that in a world where every artist is a raging political estet it would make sense why the upper crust is centered around censoring said artists, its almost as if we cant have artists that display the beauty of nature, of human imagination, why is it that artistic expressions always have to be weaponized
one thing i like most about this is how all of the convicts distinguishing features are removed before being put on trial, so some of them could've been totally in their right to make the offensive painting, but since they look like everyone else, they are convicted as if they are anyone else. it parallels the internet, because a chinese person could make an offensive chinese joke, but because of their concealed online identity, everyone acts like they are a racist for making the joke, even though it was completely fine for that person to do it.
2:47 does it satisfy me when Hitler yelled "Nein Nein Nein"? I don't know if this is hilarious or what.
2:48
Its a scene from a movie inglorious basterds
this animation has a depth to it that only something as flavorful as white bread could understand.
0:40
If you pause it, zoom in and move the screen
You can see the buttons move weirdly
bruh why tho
@@Private_jinthe buttons have a lower pixel depth to the character models, I wouldn't know the exact science behind it but I'm sure lower quality images behave differently through yt compression than higher quality images
I love this type of style. It gives me childhood memories of like making paper cut out figures in elementary. Also gives me South Park vibes too
Eh, this seems so melodramatic. This stuff only really matters if you’re Trying to get content approved by all of these groups simultaneously, and who does that?? If you want to be as broad as possible, you end up being so basic because you’re relying on commonalities, which become fewer and fewer in broad groups, that’s just how it works, but also, we can all make fun content thar’s not offense. Humor doesn’t need to be centered around making someone look bad.
fr, this short doesn’t really make any sense as an analogy. like obviously if you’re making a drawing of someone as a toilet or whatever, no matter their views or ideologies, are gonna get offended
@@Me-wx1mt The point was that everything worth saying will upset someone, somewhere. Back when offending someone was not a big deal, that was ok. Now that anyone who chooses to be offended can destroy your life, it's a serious problem.
@@Xezlec i disagree fundamentally with your view on offending people, it’s not that “back in the day nobody cared” it’s that people couldn’t say racial slurs on the internet for everybody to see
@@Me-wx1mt I think you just answered the entire point of the film
@@JerryDaPlatypus i’m not pro censoring “anything worth saying” but there’s a difference between art being censored and dumbass takes being criticized. i am actively bolstering that other persons opinion by responding
This does not occur equally. Voices against certain groups do not face backlash while other's do. If you don't believe me, create two accounts saying the exact same things and chose two 'opposing' positions and see which gets banned, shadwobanned and shut down.
Tolerance for me but not for thee
The Jews and Muslims are already dueling in irl war and the victim olympics, now all we need is the Crusaders and the power trio is back together
How to make everyone laugh.
Step 1: Draw whatever the fuck this is.
Step 2: Everyone laughs
I guess they're just handing awards out to anyone nowadays
Moral of the video: no matter what you do, someone will always be offended
Unless they're sleeping ☝️😁
@@Jerry-yd8pj yes, but It's not like all people in the world sleep at the same time
Unless they are all dead
@@punchthecake82 bruh
Ultimately it his pride that did him in. One of the best characteristics of an artist is to be humble.
If you can't win them all, do what you can. That's the artist's way.
5:55 why does this sound like a character from TF2
engineer
That’s what I was thinking
@@YellowSabreI thought it at first sounded more like whenever a spy falls lmao
@@thebrightdiamondtp7871 lol
@@elliotsturtplus340same
Moral of the story is you'll always offend someone, so who cares?
I really suck in commenting, and I don't know how to express my feelings at this video fully, but all I can say is that...this is very deep. Comedic, interesting, and deep. I needed a little help from the comments to see the message clearer though, but still, what a great video. And I like the animation style too. Well deserved award.
artists when the art they made to offend people offends people 😱
everyones talking about leaders or something, but i think its that no matter what you say or do, someone will be offended or opposed.
That’s kind of a misread/oversimplification of the substance tho. It’s not just about offensiveness but the power structures around art and the sensibilities of different groups.
@@shroomer8294 explain in great detail
@@shroomer8294 muh power structures!
I bet you believe that racism is Power+Privilege…
@@spehhhsssmarineer8961 In sociological term it is. I bet you believe grass is green.
@@shroomer8294 Its only a term used by the most infuriating sociologists. Just because they have a degree in sociology doesn’t give them the power to change the definition of a word so that it can post hoc justify their preconceptions.
Racism is prejudice based on race or ethnicity- simple as.
god its so insane how nothing of substance is said here at all other than "censorship bad" which like woah great you read fahrenheit 451 in high school and only got the most surface level understanding of it good job
no wonder every comment sounds like it was left by a middle schooler who thinks the hunger games is subversive
i cant tell who every person is supposed to be but i think it would really help your point if they werent half just really racist caricatures
Finally someone who gets it!
hey be nice
You're saying that the comments sound like middle schoolers but your comment makes no sense
Racist? How?
please go outside, you're not accomplishing anything by staying in
if you offend all of them, you get the super secret ending
That's the objective. Been working hard. Every single day.
@@anomonyous I thought that was anonymous
What in the demented Facebook grandpa is this
The message is - no matter what you joke about, you’ll always offend somebody.
@@LoveTexasToastyo lovetexastoast! Stfu! You’re so corny!
You’re on like every fucking comment no one cares bruh! Not that deep!
According to the description it’s in response to the cruel punishments given to artists around the world who mock leaders
I'm all down for political satire but how is it not childish to compare people who have risked their lives in the past for drawing cartoons mocking ruthless dictators (Hitler, Castro), to....feminists? Minorities? Wow, so deep and brave for doing so. I'm not even offended, it's just a cringe take; more so to have been gifted an award. Looks like someone spent too much time in /r/edgy
U completely misunderstood the point of this very simple video. Congrats on having such low emotional stability😂
@@ImpartialDawnthere's no point in interacting with a troll but still. What's the point then? Enlighten me since I'm such an unstable person. Specifically what do you want to rebuke in the argument I made?
@@PeterStrings hi peter, if i was a coward i would say that theres no point in trying to have a good faith conversation with someone who is using your tactic of painting me as a troll in advance, to give an excuse to run away if you fail to win in a fair debate
that being said, im not a coward and would be happy to debate you
in order to do this i think it would be helpful if you could define what exactly your argument is, such that i will be in a position to judge it. as it stands, i cannot find any argument in your original comment - only grammatically indecipherable whining about the inclusion of feminism and minorities in this video
Responding to my comment by calling me out as having "low emotional stability" is texbook definition of being a troll on the internet. I post my concern, and you simply join the conversation to insult me, instead of explaining what I got wrong. So I don't care if you get offended by calling you a troll.
Brushing off my comment as "grammatically incoherent" surely makes you look like a reasonable person. Starting off with an ad hominem argument. Secondly, the argument is pretty simple. Putting feminism on par with political satire against dictators is just bad faith. Offending tyrannical political figures that got into positions of power by claiming to be omnipotent figures, is something that should be encouraged. That's punching up. Writing offensive content against minorities or discriminated groups is clearly punching down. No matter how loud any radical feminist screams on twitter, they are not going to get you hanged or executed and dropped in a ditch, like Hitler or Casto would have. Having them side by side is a low effort comparison to make, and brushes off excluded groups that get offended when they are prejudiced. Like, let's say for instance, having exaggerated big lips in a black person caricature, or crooked teeth in the asian guy. Those are just outdated stereotypes that shouldn't be encouraged. There's a lot of people out there that we can make fun of, people in positions of power. It's stupid to consider that offending minority groups is as brave as writing cartoons of Hitler sucking dick
@@ImpartialDawnYour adoring fan pfp nullified all of that shit you said. Bye.
Reminds me a bit of Fosters Home for Imaginary Friends. Good Work!
Thank you!
The lesson is that whenever you do it, however you do it, and whoever you do it to, it will always be offensive somehow.
I mean if someone showed me a painting of myself in the most disrespectful manner they could muster... I would be pretty pissed too, I guess?
But what you will do? What power should you possess over them? This is about censorship, not just about people being offended, the film is clear about it by depicting literal executions.
But you’re not a dictator are you
That too cuz like…just draw something that’s not inherently offensive and boom you won’t get ‘killed’😭that jst irked me since it’s such a simple solution, no matter what message they’re trying to portray
@@Fish-r1y Everything is offensive bud, no matter what you do or say it is offensive to some moron.
@@Fish-r1y then that means you're not free
This is what it's like to post art on Twitter.
Just joke about everyone and not one particular person or group of people.
Fitting for the South Park style it's got.
As that show is all about that.
Yeah, every single piece of entertainment has to make jokes about everyone otherwise it's not Ok.
Which button presser resembles you most?
wtf r you talking about, hes saying if you say something offensive, dont target specific groups, you have make fun of everyone equally so you dont seem fucking racist towards a group, if you make fun of everyone, then you arent targetting a specific group duh.@@kelp7060
@@kelp7060 cope
Even if it isn't offensive, someone will find it offensive, for f*ck sake people were offended over that McDonald’s commercial that depicted a wholesome family.
the art has little to nothing to do with south park's. that being said, this animation has such an eye-catching and appealing style which is mixed wonderfully with the non-verbal interactions between the characters. short and sweet. the message is simple but meaningful.
This short is like when journalists write puff pieces about how they are the defenders of truth lol.
Absolutely 😂
Amazing animation, I love how you included the South Park animation style while sharing message through it, great work. I was expecting an other alternative, like the painter making fun of himself, so he would have drawn his face, but this unexpected ending is way funnier. Nowadays you can only make fun of yourself so people won't blame you.
Glad you enjoyed it!
@@ShortFrameFilmYeah great job you deserve the views
@ricardo-2022 what a relevant answer
Art is allowed to be offensive as long as it isn't hateful
I am the only one who thought this was South Park?
Nope
Love the, "NEIN, NEIN, NEIN" reference @2:46 Watched Inglourious Basterds too many times lol
the Downfall reference?
@@slavic_viking9638 The one I'm talking about is from Inglourious Basterds ruclips.net/video/6hxG_apfh7E/видео.html
How did this win an award lmaooo😂😂
fr 😂
because the centrists who made this create imaginary demons on their heads
Ignorant ppl be like:
the guy who made this probably has persecution complex.
Put Hitler and the anti-racist in the same place... makes no sense
No offense.
looks like there aren't any friendly faces anywhere
Let alone humble folks without temptation
@@jasonparker3925can’t even go to South Park in 2024 and leave my woes behind💀😭
I like how the artist chose to portray an anonymous woman in a Burqa instead of an actual Islamic figure. Shows the hypocrisy in the artist's willingness to be truly "edgy."
2/10, reminded me of South Park. Enjoy the cute little award you got.
I think the message could be conveyed without relying on a tasteless charicature of Africans 😭 unsurprising this is from Belgium
cope
it was based on a specific african dictator.
That's called satire
@@youngmanoldman32which one?
Finally someone said it
The style of South Park has improved so much over time
The person who made this is claiming to be an advocate of free speech, bust seeing a lot of the extras he added in, I'm pretty sure "Free speech" means saying racial slurs in public without social repercussion.
The fact is this short movie did faced censorship risks.