I had meant as only a hedge on the lays, so only hard 4 or hard 10. (or both as you play) That way the lay would ONLY lose on 1-3,3-1 (hedged by 2-2,2-2) and/or 6-4,4-6 (hedged by 5-5,5-5). Thanks for these videos I like your perspective on things.
I’ve tried to place the hard ways in a simulator and only lost more money. I find laddering the DP, 4, and 10 up a unit each works better for a hit quick and run. But you need bank roll and discipline. Discipline is the hard part for me 😂
@@Jesse_OG2VR I’m still learning that discipline, especially when I tell myself regress regress only to seven out on the next roll. Would’ve should’ve could’ve, but didn’t.
wow cool
I had meant as only a hedge on the lays, so only hard 4 or hard 10. (or both as you play) That way the lay would ONLY lose on 1-3,3-1 (hedged by 2-2,2-2) and/or 6-4,4-6 (hedged by 5-5,5-5). Thanks for these videos I like your perspective on things.
That's a really interesting strategy. I'll have to try it out next time! now it makes sense
Don't you loose on the 7 if you are on the don't come?
@@HMallory17or 11 that is correct my friend, and you win with 2 or 3. Thanks for watching!
I’ve tried to place the hard ways in a simulator and only lost more money. I find laddering the DP, 4, and 10 up a unit each works better for a hit quick and run. But you need bank roll and discipline. Discipline is the hard part for me 😂
@@Jesse_OG2VR Yes playing them all definitely lose in the long run, just like any other bet in the middle of the table.
@@Jesse_OG2VR I’m still learning that discipline, especially when I tell myself regress regress only to seven out on the next roll. Would’ve should’ve could’ve, but didn’t.
How can you tell us a strategy and not play it out right away. Then you play the hardwats the next time. You are quite confusing
Thanks for watching! I appreciate your feedback, I’m pretty sure I played the lays and the hardways, not sure how I confused you.