Hey folks! Please, subscribe, comment, like, and share this video with you friends and classmates to help promote the channel! Thank you for your support, you guys are awesome!
Strictly speaking, it's the same thing. Some people prefer to define side product as another organic species, while byproduct as an inorganic one. To my knowledge, there's no "official" definition or difference.
@@zulqarnainchaughtai Yeah, yeah, I saw that one, it's an old argument. It boils down to personal opinions and arguments of grumpy old men. There's still no "official" definition, so we can use whatever the heck we want 😉 I also want to point out that the editorial you're referring here ends with: "Views expressed in this editorial are those of the author..." When in doubt, you can always look things up in the IUPAC Gold Book (goldbook.iupac.org/terms) for the general terminology or the "Blue Book" which is specifically the organic chemistry nomenclature rules if it comes to naming molecules. Some years back, there was another funny article in JCE or CERP, don't remember now exactly, where the author was arguing about the "correct way" of drawing the curved arrow, like how much of a curve is "right" and how much of a curve is "too much" 😹
Hey folks! Please, subscribe, comment, like, and share this video with you friends and classmates to help promote the channel! Thank you for your support, you guys are awesome!
I had no idea (or had completely forgotten) that you shouldn't show the formation of the product as a termination step. Cool to know!
You could show it but you still have to remember that the amount of final product coming from the termination step is negligible.
Thanks for the explanation
You are perfect sir!! Thank you so much!! I love you
Thanks 😺
Very helpful, thanks
Thank you so much! Best explanation
Glad you found it useful 👍
Keep making great content!
Thanks, will do!
very helpful! thank you!
HBr and HCl are side products or byproducts?
Strictly speaking, it's the same thing. Some people prefer to define side product as another organic species, while byproduct as an inorganic one. To my knowledge, there's no "official" definition or difference.
@@zulqarnainchaughtai Yeah, yeah, I saw that one, it's an old argument. It boils down to personal opinions and arguments of grumpy old men. There's still no "official" definition, so we can use whatever the heck we want 😉 I also want to point out that the editorial you're referring here ends with: "Views expressed in this editorial are those of the author..." When in doubt, you can always look things up in the IUPAC Gold Book (goldbook.iupac.org/terms) for the general terminology or the "Blue Book" which is specifically the organic chemistry nomenclature rules if it comes to naming molecules. Some years back, there was another funny article in JCE or CERP, don't remember now exactly, where the author was arguing about the "correct way" of drawing the curved arrow, like how much of a curve is "right" and how much of a curve is "too much" 😹
@@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor Thanks for suggesting IUPAC's books.
@@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor whhhhaaasaaaatttttt😂😂😂 the right curvature?? For real ? 😂😂😂
@@back2back135 Yep 😹😹😹