Mystery of Prince Rupert's Drop at 130,000 fps - Smarter Every Day 86

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
  • "Goggle Up! Science is about to happen...Share by Tweet: bit.ly/YAsk8M Facebook: bit.ly/PrinceRu...
    READ THE ADDITIONAL INFO HERE! (Click "Show More"!)
    Please help me justify putting this much time and effort into a video by clicking "LIKE" and SHARING this as much as possible. Click the following: Tweet: bit.ly/TweetRupert Facebook: bit.ly/PrinceRu... Please share with any science blogs or outlets you think would enjoy it.
    Videos like this don't just happen. They require lots of time, and lots of favors from very smart and kind people willing to help me and you learn. PLEASE take a moment and read the following information and support those who supported me.
    This is the camera we used for the ultra-high speed shots. It has the "FAST" option.
    www.visionresea...
    You absolutely have to check out the stuff Cal Makes. We're just goofing off in this video, but the guy is some type of glass wizard genius. It would make me happy if you bought something from him and he felt like the audience appreciated all the time he donated to this video. He basically gave me 2 entire nights of his entire shop.
    orbixhotglass.com/
    I feel like we're friends at this point, and he is open to the idea of doing more videos in the future and teach me more about what he knows about glass. Let's make it worth his time.
    I'm a HUGE FAN of the song Gordon wrote for this video. His landlord would really appreciated if you downloaded it so he could make rent this month.
    ashellinthepit....
    It looks like he's assembling a new album that I may like more than Mammals:
    ashellinthepit....
    Show him some love.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    This video involved about 2 months of research, and me reaching out to several individuals. I would like to thank everyone who took time out of their schedule to contribute to my wacky research. A big thanks to the following people:
    My wife and kids. I'm sorry this took so long and I wasn't the kind of active father I want to be during the 5 weeks it took to make this.
    Dr. Martyn Poliakoff for getting me access to documents which details experiments on the Prince Rupert's Drop by the Royal Society
    rsnr.royalsocie... (behind a pay wall)
    Being able to calculate the failure front velocity of a Prince Rupert's drop is a pretty big deal. For years this was a scientific mystery. High speed camera technology is only recently fast enough to provide data like this. Thanks to Vision Research for letting me use the V1610 to try to unravel this mystery for the public in general.
    Rob Kuefner for reaching out to me and offering to convert certain equations into LaTeX format for me.
    Dr. Jeff Evans from UAH. A friend and neighbor who just happens to have a PhD and be an expert in fracture mechanics. bit.ly/YLezDA Thank you for helping me by pointing me in the right direction in the early stages of my research. It's time we hangout again.
    Brian: thanks for letting me use your green screen and telling me about Orbix in the first place. I stayed up there til about 1 or 2 am two nights in a row acting stupid in front of of the camera all alone. Now that I look back at that footage without the context of this video, it's all very strange.
    Thanks to Loïc Samuel for taking time to make the custom TNT Degradation graphic!
    P.S. There was some old guy walking around the track at the park when I was filming me jumping on the bridge railing. I'm pretty sure you kept walking until I was done just to make sure you wouldn't have to take me to the hospital if I broke my leg. I'll never meet you again, but I'm grateful for this kind gesture you didn't know I noticed.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    GET STUFF SECTION:
    (If I did this right these should be working Amazon affiliate links to purchase the stuff I like to use. When people purchase from these links it will support Smarter Every Day.)
    Things I use and like:
    📷Camera I use : amzn.to/2VSiruw
    Favorite Lens: amzn.to/2KPDQ1a
    On-camera Mic: amzn.to/3aVVbjz
    Lav Mic: amzn.to/3aRek6r
    Hot shoe mount for Lav Receiver: amzn.to/35m6uAo
    My Tripod: amzn.to/2Yl6RtJ
    Favorite SD Card: amzn.to/2KQ3Edz
    🥽Goggle Up! : amzn.to/2zG754g
    Also, if you’re interested in a Smarter Every Day shirt etc. they’re really soft and you can get there here: www.smartereve...
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Tweet ideas to me @SmarterRUclips
    Instead of saving for my kids' college, I make videos using the money I would have saved.
    The thought is it will help educate the world as a whole, and one day generate enough revenue to pay for their education. Until then if you appreciate what you've learned in this video and the effort that went in to it, please SHARE THE VIDEO!

Комментарии • 7 тыс.

  • @z-beeblebrox
    @z-beeblebrox 7 лет назад +4965

    So what you're saying is, if you somehow made a Rupert's Drop with a mile-long tail, it would still take less than a second for the whole thing to explode?

    • @Owlpunk
      @Owlpunk 7 лет назад +745

      Yes. By the way: The ISS orbits the Earth at almost 7 times the speed of failure front :D

    • @wesofx8148
      @wesofx8148 7 лет назад +1147

      The logistics of making a mile-long Rupert's drop would be hilarious.

    • @CrazyFunnyCats
      @CrazyFunnyCats 7 лет назад +172

      z beeblebrox what if the water to cool was boiling water?, and what if they used ice water ?
      Think they may work
      If the boiling water was used it would slow down the cooling and the molecular bond should be stronger .?
      At least it works that way with springs for race cars . We heat the springs and let them cool down very slowly in steel buckets of super fine sand.

    • @sumaprasad5029
      @sumaprasad5029 7 лет назад +24

      how are you gonna do that

    • @Atlantis357
      @Atlantis357 7 лет назад +106

      the "shockwave" would go through the drop at sound speed

  • @christianstelmakh1921
    @christianstelmakh1921 3 года назад +942

    Said a million times but THIS is EXACTLY what RUclips was made for. Thank you so much Destin, so so much. You're a legend.

  • @sdrawkcab6283
    @sdrawkcab6283 6 лет назад +1407

    Prince Rupert, I don't feel so good...

  • @Nonkel_Jef
    @Nonkel_Jef 3 года назад +773

    I love how you're casually holding exploding glass without gloves.

    • @cherylcasio9401
      @cherylcasio9401 3 года назад +113

      Or lung protection

    • @tosrtv7591
      @tosrtv7591 2 года назад +7

      Rs😂😂💯

    • @sgtjohnson49
      @sgtjohnson49 2 года назад +42

      I like how the owner of the glass shop turns his face away from the exploding glass, exposing his ear canal to all the tiny bits of glass shrapnel exploding towards him.

    • @higaddrip2583
      @higaddrip2583 2 года назад +6

      @@sgtjohnson49 is that not better than glass in your eyes?

    • @sgtjohnson49
      @sgtjohnson49 2 года назад +17

      @@higaddrip2583 it'd be better to wear eye protection, preferably a face shield, considering they're deliberating exploding glass. Then you don't have to expose your eyes or your ear canals to said exploding glass.

  • @ichi-bann
    @ichi-bann 3 года назад +187

    can we appreciate how he filmed himself using 3 different colored shirts just for us to get smarter.... youre the best man

    • @ImThatGirl101
      @ImThatGirl101 Год назад

      He did that so we could get smarter...every day.

  • @backwoodsjunkie08
    @backwoodsjunkie08 6 лет назад +2488

    I absolutely loved the explanation with all the mini you's

  • @oskarvonreuenthal7732
    @oskarvonreuenthal7732 5 лет назад +478

    3:22 OOOHHHH so this is why some glass looks rainbowish when you wear polarized sunglasses. I've always wondered

    • @dangleason9023
      @dangleason9023 4 года назад +58

      Yes. Usually side windows on a car will have rainbows or patterns in them, it is tempered glass. While the windshield never has that effect because it's regular glass.
      Great observation!

    • @Doxsein
      @Doxsein 3 года назад +2

      Nice observation indeed

    • @shadymcnasty5920
      @shadymcnasty5920 2 года назад

      My tints in my car do this

  • @thehandleiwantedwasntavailable
    @thehandleiwantedwasntavailable 5 лет назад +7

    My Dad sent me the link to this video 2 years ago. I never looked at the link at the time. Caught up In my own bubble; work, kids, life.
    I’ve clicked on his link today, which is the first anniversary since he died.
    Thanks for the link Dad. As you said, it’s very interesting.
    Rest In Peace. I miss you.

  • @chubbyninja842
    @chubbyninja842 9 лет назад +96

    QUESTION
    What happens if you re-heat the tail end of the drop? Can you melt it down to more of an egg shape, preserving the strength, or will melting cause it to explode?

    • @Enny_Gima
      @Enny_Gima 9 лет назад +19

      ZombieTex
      Likely the melting would cause failure, because it would re-liquefy the glass molecules, thus allowing them to release their energy, causing the chained explosion.

    • @calvinpham5547
      @calvinpham5547 9 лет назад +8

      ZombieTex Can we make a bomb with this? I mean pack a lot of them into a vacuum sealed chamber with oxygen canisters and flammable fuel. Upon impact oxygen is release and mix with those exploding glass powder and flame...Just wondering

    • @kendo512
      @kendo512 9 лет назад +57

      Calvin Pham I feel like you're on some sort of list for this comment

    • @calvinpham5547
      @calvinpham5547 9 лет назад +3

      This is a scientific question. It is difficult to make that many drops, and it's probably expensive. The internal explosion travels faster than a bullet. I don't think terrorist would want to build a furnace big enough for it. Risky to pack them, since one mishaps will trigger the rest to blow.

    • @chubbyninja842
      @chubbyninja842 9 лет назад +3

      kendo512 I'm probably on a lot of lists for a lot of reasons :)

  • @ittixen
    @ittixen 3 года назад +40

    This is one of the best videos I've seen, in every category.
    Short and to the point, yet comprehensive, clear, wonderfully illustrated and animated, funny, creative...
    That's the kinda stuff that made me subscribe to this channel.

  • @BiffcheeseSpinoccoli
    @BiffcheeseSpinoccoli 8 лет назад +46

    I'm interested in the two questions asked earlier: 1) What WOULD happen if it were to be cooled in liquid nitrogen? And 2) As the molten glass dripped, could it perhaps be quickly clipped off in order to create more of a round shape than a drop?

    • @sederquest
      @sederquest 8 лет назад +7

      Good questions especially the second one

    • @finnelhumano6096
      @finnelhumano6096 8 лет назад +11

      I think it wouldn't differ much because the difference in temperature between molten glass (1400-1600°C) and water (20°C) and between molten glass and liquid nitrogen (-200°C) isn't that great.

    • @wesleysmith7285
      @wesleysmith7285 8 лет назад +6

      yea water's specific heat is 4.186 joule/gram °C and liquid nitrogen's S.H. is 2.04 j/g C so it would "hold" less heat per unit mass before increasing in temperature. so it would not do as well cooling the whole glass drop as water would. I suspect that the surface would cool faster(only because it can achieve a lower temperature than water while staying a liquid) but then the heated nitrogen would turn to gas and form barrier between the bulb and the rest of the liquid and ultimately make the cooling process slower.

    • @Allangulon
      @Allangulon 8 лет назад +2

      +Wesley Smith Perhaps if the Leidenfrost effect could be negated, the cooling would occur far more rapidly. I wonder if the water were to be put under enormous pressure, the liquid would be forced into direct contact with the glass?

    • @a5noble2
      @a5noble2 8 лет назад +4

      Great questions. What is actually happening here is you are creating tempered glass. The only thing required to make the glass tempered is the rapid cooling of it which hardens the outside first, so it should be the exact same regardless of if you do it in liquid nitrogen, water, or oil (like they use for metals). I think the only difference is 'how' tempered it is. The colder ones may make them explode faster where the slower cooling ones may only make it shatter, but not explode.
      Now if you made it more round, it'd be the exact same thing and have the exact same properties just without a tail. Both are tempered glass, just they have different shapes. The TV show Hacking the System had a really interesting demonstration of this. They had the side windows of a car (made from tempered glass) and tried to smash them with a hammer to no avail. Then he took a tiny ceramic bit from the spark plug and tossed it at the glass and it shattered into a million pieces.

  • @olliefraga
    @olliefraga 4 года назад +37

    What we take for granted here is the effort and care put on an educational video for us curious people. All power to you!

  • @cyrillian13
    @cyrillian13 9 лет назад +104

    How did i get here from watching someone drop a red hot ball of nickel on ice?

    • @KaZeRs
      @KaZeRs 9 лет назад +1

      Omfg, dont tell me from 9gag as well. I was watching RHNB before this too.

    • @cyrillian13
      @cyrillian13 9 лет назад +1

      lol

    • @jordanjohnson714
      @jordanjohnson714 9 лет назад

      Same here

    • @jeffazi
      @jeffazi 9 лет назад

      EpsilonBTS I'm not sure but I want to see the nickel on ice. Link? LOL

    • @Banzay27
      @Banzay27 9 лет назад

      EpsilonBTS linkage

  • @gavinsonsalla9319
    @gavinsonsalla9319 4 года назад +199

    So since the front is moving faster than the speed of sound, I wonder if this could be considered a detonation instead of an explosion.

    • @curtaustin8119
      @curtaustin8119 2 года назад +30

      The speed of sound in glass is about 2500 m/s, so not as fast. BTW, detonation is a type of explosion, but we have more profound semantic problems here - it's not clear where the rapid increase in volume occurs here, the usual definition of explosion. Just a lot of fracturing going on. The fracture of brittle materials is classically treated as governed by the strain energy required to create the fracture surfaces. That is, the energy goes into creating surface energy. Obviously, some energy is going to propelling all the bits, and is transferred to air as kinetic energy and an earth-shattering KABOOM!

    • @luisrocha26
      @luisrocha26 2 года назад

      @@curtaustin8119 that was a great and clear explanation, thank you!!!

    • @nottoday3878
      @nottoday3878 11 месяцев назад

      I'm surprised government didn't weaponize it

    • @JetFalcon710
      @JetFalcon710 9 месяцев назад

      ​@@nottoday3878 This kind of thing seems very hard to weaponize

  • @15brooksa
    @15brooksa 11 лет назад +154

    would a prince Rupert's drop in space not having a tail be indestructible?

    • @Aleschu
      @Aleschu 8 лет назад +19

      But the tail is from it dropping into the water, not the air. But in space there is no gravity so you will put it into water not drop it. therefor no tail but it "only" works in 0g.

    • @benmasta5814
      @benmasta5814 8 лет назад

      so would you have to inject the glass into the water somehow? IT needs the insta-cool of the speed of gravity pulling into the water doesnt it?
      How do you inject glass? Theres gotta be a way? Wouldnt there be a tail there too though?
      Arg science

    • @alzino187
      @alzino187 8 лет назад

      Ben Masta a

    • @joec2078
      @joec2078 8 лет назад +7

      In a 0g environment, the molten glass can be suspended then the water can be moved to the glass rather than the glass to the water.

    • @ashscott6068
      @ashscott6068 8 лет назад +34

      The ball end is NOT indestructable. It's just hard to break it without breaking the tail first

  • @thiccysgarage8472
    @thiccysgarage8472 4 года назад +92

    6:05 i wonder where prince rupert lives now

  • @SeanKL107
    @SeanKL107 7 лет назад +645

    0:45 "Kind of looks like a tadpole" Yup. A tadpole. That's what I was thinking too...

  • @OfelieArt
    @OfelieArt 7 лет назад +1478

    Hydraulic Press vs Rupert drop

    • @blackkissi
      @blackkissi 7 лет назад +56

      it's been done already. search for it

    • @felixb.59
      @felixb.59 7 лет назад +76

      OfelieArt
      look it up, theres already a video of it on youtube. it's amazing. spoiler alert:
      it dents the press :O

    • @tracewallace23
      @tracewallace23 7 лет назад +17

      20 tons of pressure

    • @chettykowen
      @chettykowen 7 лет назад

      yes

    • @dusk4511
      @dusk4511 7 лет назад +4

      OfelieArt
      It will break. There's a vid of it somewhere

  • @TwoCraZyEyes0
    @TwoCraZyEyes0 8 лет назад +216

    what if you put a prince rupert's drop under a 100 ton press? would it break then? sounds like a job for hydraulic press channel

    • @DERP0L0GY
      @DERP0L0GY 8 лет назад +15

      Been done, the drop doesn't break

    • @tobyjones-worth5111
      @tobyjones-worth5111 8 лет назад +8

      that was a lead base. :/

    • @DarkGharren
      @DarkGharren 8 лет назад +2

      I'm pretty sure it would break, and you'd need far less than 100 tons.

    • @tryskacz
      @tryskacz 8 лет назад +1

      it is done already ;) i found it on two channels at least :)

    • @blatz4306
      @blatz4306 8 лет назад +5

      search prince rupert's drop here on youtube. You will find the video that he did this. And the exploded in 20ton press.

  • @brycejohnson9571
    @brycejohnson9571 4 года назад +60

    Omg I love that animation just him crouching made me start dying in laughter

  • @donbasuradenuevo
    @donbasuradenuevo 11 лет назад +42

    Humanity should try to make a Prince Rupert Drop that is 3 kilometers long, and just shatter it just for the LOLz.

    • @diegosanchez894
      @diegosanchez894 7 лет назад

      donbasuradenuevo it would take 2 seconds to go from one end to the other,

    • @flameshoter6
      @flameshoter6 7 лет назад

      i would enjoy watching it in slow motion... @diego

    • @Ascii89
      @Ascii89 7 лет назад

      Diego Sanchez it would actually take 502.7 microseconds (if you don't factor in deceleration) that's 0.0005s

    • @michaelclermont
      @michaelclermont 7 лет назад

      Deceleration because of the energy released in the tail?

  • @mannyglover
    @mannyglover 6 лет назад +51

    Very cool! As a fellow Southerner, I have to say that one thing I like about this video is that it illustrates the fact that a Southern accent is not synonymous with ignorance. Great job with explaining the science with good visualizations and some comic relief too :-)

  • @jacekjankowski8811
    @jacekjankowski8811 9 лет назад +739

    I want to see Prince Rupert's Drop made in no gravity enviroment, without a tail...

    • @mika2666
      @mika2666 9 лет назад +28

      +Jacek J that's actually very smart!!

    • @skittyzed
      @skittyzed 9 лет назад +116

      +Jacek J If you want a perfectly spherical one you can do that on earth, just need to drop it from a very high height, that's how lead shot or ball bearings are made, liquid falling turns into a sphere (rather than what is thought as a "rain drop" shape)

    • @mikenoden6068
      @mikenoden6068 9 лет назад +52

      +skittyzed any idea what sort of height you'd be dealing with? The molten glass seems pretty viscous, it may take a while to round itself out.
      Too high and you'd have to worry about it cooling on the way down.
      Experiment design:
      1) get a tube made of a very heat resistant material (open at both ends),
      2) at the bottom have a compressed gas torch or torch + air jet that will be enough to keep a drop of glass suspended and molten in the tube.
      3) drop some glass in the top and let it "fall" long enough to round out.
      4) quickly remove torch/air and let it fall out the bottom of the tube into a water bath.

    • @TheNoBSZone
      @TheNoBSZone 8 лет назад +4

      +Jacek J First thing I thought of when I saw a prince ruperts drop for the first time.. I'd love to see this as well.

    • @krischurch5677
      @krischurch5677 8 лет назад +3

      +mike noden - What you seem to be discussing involves magnetism. Put a high powere magnet through a tube of copper and it slows down. this technically can be done to a point where the magnet will almost if not fully suspend = balanced rounding out - unsure ref the magnet being inside as magnets dont like heat it disrupts them but i'm sure there is a way of combining both ideas and your experiment working :)

  • @snailsaredumb9412
    @snailsaredumb9412 3 года назад +156

    4:32 before Microscopes, people thought sperm looked like this, men in tiny capsules that made people

    • @michaellange6598
      @michaellange6598 3 года назад

      yes their called hymen heads

    • @sergetys
      @sergetys 3 года назад +2

      Wait, that’s not how it works?!

    • @snailsaredumb9412
      @snailsaredumb9412 3 года назад +3

      @@sergetys no, it is. I was just lying...

    • @sergetys
      @sergetys 3 года назад +3

      @@snailsaredumb9412 oh, thank god. Phew! Was a close one.

    • @elliottharris7496
      @elliottharris7496 3 года назад +1

      I got very spermy vibes from this part in particular

  • @smartereveryday
    @smartereveryday  11 лет назад +585

    Prince Rupert's Drop!

    • @CarlosPortela
      @CarlosPortela 11 лет назад +6

      Great ... excellent ... brilliant.
      Thanks for your videos ... i love them.
      I'm physics teacher in Portugal and use them in my classes.
      Keep it up.

    • @netearanull6181
      @netearanull6181 11 лет назад

    • @ethen770
      @ethen770 11 лет назад +6

      Hey, my name is Evan, and i was watching this video and started thinking,,,what would happen if you tried to reliquify the tail end. or the head of one of those drops. would it explode? or just melt?
      Thanks for all the awesome videos, and the true love for science. I hope to hear back from you soon!
      -Evan

    • @seand3193
      @seand3193 11 лет назад +4

      So if you manage to drop a semi spherical gob of molten glass in the water... it wouldn't have a tail to break from right? you could make ball bearings and really hard ornaments...

    • @AyalStein
      @AyalStein 11 лет назад +1

      loved the video! can you make a video of how a spider climbs its string? because the other day I found a spider hanging from its own thread that he wrapped around a pole, and if you look real close, it looked like his legs were not touching the string! his insides were pulling the string and letting go of it to lower.

  • @DeadHawk23
    @DeadHawk23 7 лет назад +143

    What happens if you make one that's way bigger?

    • @nachtelfirokese88
      @nachtelfirokese88 7 лет назад +9

      The exact same thing. Only that the breaking point/exploding point is far more away from the tip of the Drop.

    • @dusk4511
      @dusk4511 7 лет назад +14

      RedHawk Gamer
      Bigger explosion and more fun

    • @Crecross
      @Crecross 7 лет назад +23

      Duxx Skuxx bigger explosion and possibly death😂

    • @jamesdong8179
      @jamesdong8179 5 лет назад +4

      Actually, I think it may collapse under its own tension because when it's bigger, you have less surface area to more volume, means less surface has to support more inside tension

    • @Tds206
      @Tds206 5 лет назад

      then u have a bigger prince ruperts drop.

  • @MrHeroicDemon
    @MrHeroicDemon 3 года назад +4

    I can't believe this video is almost 9 years old.... I remember when this video came out. I'm still here watching and getting smartereveryday since this. Thank you Destin.

  • @foozlesprite
    @foozlesprite 5 лет назад +14

    I finally came back to watch this video when I heard you call your cat Prince Rupert in a video. Love both this phenomenon and the cat, but I *especially* love the oldschool Bill Nye vibes the little color-coded tensile-strength Destins were giving off. I always appreciate a good visual aid, haha.

  • @georgeofhamilton
    @georgeofhamilton 9 лет назад +13

    We should make a mile-long Prince Rupert's drop to see it explode in less than a second.

  • @NintendoThumb
    @NintendoThumb 8 лет назад +149

    so when that exploded, shouldn't he have had gloves on? It seems like there would be little shards flying into everything exposed.

    • @AetherBoye
      @AetherBoye 8 лет назад +33

      All the shards are basically the size of dust particles.

    • @mikikiki
      @mikikiki 8 лет назад +35

      +TheGreenPanda I have a share of glass in my foot right now. IDGAF how small the pieces allegedly are, I bet you wouldn't walk around barefoot on that patio.

    • @bernardo00124719
      @bernardo00124719 8 лет назад

      no he shouldnt.

    • @AetherBoye
      @AetherBoye 8 лет назад +2

      +MilkiKiki i probably would

    • @Khorne19
      @Khorne19 8 лет назад +6

      Do you even know how to swim?

  • @productionmark
    @productionmark 7 лет назад +67

    Beautiful. Science is beautiful. Love your passion for it.

  • @briansmithbeta
    @briansmithbeta 5 лет назад +15

    This is still one of my favorite science videos in 2019.

  • @JeremyReger
    @JeremyReger 10 лет назад +36

    I am apparently late to the party, but glad I made it! this is awesome!

    • @Killimansorrow
      @Killimansorrow 10 лет назад +1

      I love this channel.

    • @QazmeHabu
      @QazmeHabu 10 лет назад +3

      Yeah Destin has some really good videos.

    • @nullgel
      @nullgel 10 лет назад +3

      Most are great for kids too. My daughter loves them.

  • @SonariNeiracchen
    @SonariNeiracchen 8 лет назад +74

    So if I make a mile long rupert's drop, it'd only take about a second to explode?

    • @Sure-
      @Sure- 8 лет назад +6

      yup

    • @xayer5
      @xayer5 8 лет назад +29

      +Poo Face Don't you have to consider that the speed of sound is much higher in different materials? 1234km/h are just the speed of sound in air. The speed of sound in glass should be around 14200km/h

    • @MazeFrame
      @MazeFrame 8 лет назад +3

      +Poo Face Measure the wave lengths in longitudinal direction. From that you can calculate the speed of sound. For glas it should be arround 5000m/s (=18,000km/h = 11,184mph).

    • @SonariNeiracchen
      @SonariNeiracchen 8 лет назад

      +Poo Face Also temperature and pressure.

    • @SonariNeiracchen
      @SonariNeiracchen 8 лет назад

      Of course we're talking approximates here :)

  • @MetalMarauder
    @MetalMarauder 8 лет назад +639

    so if i made a mile-long prince rupert's drop, it would break in 1 second?

    • @euphoria9755
      @euphoria9755 8 лет назад +80

      yes

    • @TheThomas4433
      @TheThomas4433 8 лет назад +11

      +Metal Marauder uhm, why are you questioning this? it has literally been asked 4 months prior to you. is it just for comedic value? or for the comments?

    • @MetalMarauder
      @MetalMarauder 8 лет назад +130

      ***** i was just curious. sorry i didn't check all the comments first

    • @TheThomas4433
      @TheThomas4433 8 лет назад +7

      The thing is, the Exaxt same question was asked and i think its in the top 10 comments. Thats why i was wondering. Fun fact, that comment was literally right above yours. For me at least...

    • @MetalMarauder
      @MetalMarauder 8 лет назад +25

      ***** well i didn't look

  • @sghksfhk
    @sghksfhk 2 года назад +5

    Sometimes, you never know what you want to learn until you learn it. This was incredibly interesting. Thank you. Learn everything you can fellow people!

  • @zohaibbhatti7818
    @zohaibbhatti7818 8 лет назад +5

    I want to see a price Rupert drop shatter under water in slow mo

  • @ziadassaad1371
    @ziadassaad1371 2 года назад +18

    May it be characterized as a frozen explosion? All of the internal tension waiting to be released due to the rapid cooling?

  • @Nomaditis
    @Nomaditis 3 года назад +7

    Its crazy to think thatDestin's videos that were made in 2013 has better quality than most of todays videos.

    • @emmahacker4020
      @emmahacker4020 3 года назад

      He makes great stuff and he’s been ahead of the game in doing so
      Nerds ftw 🎉

  • @unit0713
    @unit0713 5 лет назад +180

    5:13 Mr.Stark, I don’t feel so good

  • @voixmin
    @voixmin 7 лет назад +32

    I hate how entertaining these videos are.

  • @eerereps
    @eerereps 7 лет назад +11

    3:26 perfect explanation! Loved it!

  • @winkyshy2
    @winkyshy2 8 лет назад +80

    neat trick with all the little mini yous going on there. but i bet buying all those red blue and grey shirts cost alot.

    • @imBlook
      @imBlook 8 лет назад +3

      uhhhhh he only bought 1 pair of each color lol

    • @Rafa-mc2zw
      @Rafa-mc2zw 8 лет назад +45

      that was a joke you dummie

    • @unequaledone
      @unequaledone 8 лет назад +13

      Bet it cost even more to clone himself that many times

    • @SebHaarfagre
      @SebHaarfagre 6 лет назад +2

      Not to think of all the food consumption. Man, I don't think this is very sustainable.

    • @notaprohmm3459
      @notaprohmm3459 6 лет назад

      May be he purchased only one tshirt and editing does all that

  • @lordofelectrons4513
    @lordofelectrons4513 3 года назад +8

    Many years ago I was employed as a scientific glass blower this is where I first
    encounter these. I made many of them smaller ones seemed even more indestructible.
    As one may expect the quality of the drop varies with the glass type used. Low
    expatiation glass like Pyrex is poor while a much higher expansion lead glass yields
    good results like those seen in the video.

  • @flyingcooney
    @flyingcooney 7 лет назад +14

    Being a glazier, I have to ask, "No gloves? Really?". Glass splinters are the worst!

  • @AnnalisaParentSummea
    @AnnalisaParentSummea 6 лет назад +20

    "Goggle up. Science is about to happen" . Ha! love it!

    • @strangejmaster
      @strangejmaster 3 года назад +2

      when I was a kid doing a "science experiment" I used to say "Goggles on!" and now it's a joke in my family...

  • @butterflygroundhog
    @butterflygroundhog 9 лет назад +150

    i like how this is a science channel but it uses miles per seconds

    • @MattMcConaha
      @MattMcConaha 9 лет назад +33

      It's a channel which strives to teach and encourage interest in science to the general public, meaning that the use of units which are familiar to the general public is the obvious best choice.
      You need to take some sort of technical writing class (which as far as I know every STEM student has to take) or something similar if you don't understand that you need to adjust your communication in order to be comprehensible to your target audience.

    • @megabigblur
      @megabigblur 9 лет назад +21

      Matt McConaha The general American public. #justsaying Your point is valid but the USA really should have switched over long ago. I've heard middle-aged Americans say there was an attempt to teach them when they were kids but it fizzled..probably for some dumb political reason.

    • @MattMcConaha
      @MattMcConaha 9 лет назад +19

      megabigblur Well Americans make up a large portion of his viewership, so it makes sense to give the units that Americans use. And he also showed SI units, so I don't know why anyone is complaining.
      I agree that it would be nice if the US switched units, but I also understand that it is logistically difficult to do so.

    • @SlinkiestPopi
      @SlinkiestPopi 9 лет назад +3

      megabigblur we tried, but the only measurement that stuck was liters.

    • @mmnissanzroadster9
      @mmnissanzroadster9 9 лет назад +2

      +maxime therrien If we switched over now imagine how many signs, rulers, and other measurement objects we'd have to completely remake or change.

  • @Ry3n590
    @Ry3n590 4 года назад +144

    I'm not interested in the glass breaking, I'm interested how they don't get their hands pierced by the glass.

    • @Shampoid
      @Shampoid 4 года назад +11

      Probably because the shards are too small maybe

    • @veggielovers7502
      @veggielovers7502 4 года назад +16

      @@Shampoid Wouldn't tiny pieces be worse though? Like they could enter cavities like nostrils and ears... can someone answer whether or not it would actually be pretty hazardous without protection?

    • @Shampoid
      @Shampoid 4 года назад

      @@veggielovers7502 maybe if its as small as most sand particles it wouldnt be dangerous

    • @veggielovers7502
      @veggielovers7502 4 года назад +6

      @@Shampoid But how? You don't have to answer but tiny pieces of glass could easily rupture blood vessels, cause internal bleeding, etc., i imagine

    • @Ollybollyk
      @Ollybollyk 4 года назад +16

      Veggie Lovers I think the glass shards are still too heavy to breathe in.
      That’d explain why this guy didn’t use protection at least, considering he’s meant to be a professional.
      Too small to pierce skin, but too heavy to float in the air.

  • @DragonSoulMusic
    @DragonSoulMusic 7 лет назад +177

    What manner of sorcery is this

  • @Pinoccappuccino
    @Pinoccappuccino 7 лет назад +8

    I found about this channel just today, but the cat convinced me. I have subscribed.

  • @TheParablade
    @TheParablade 7 лет назад +173

    Now I wanna see a 100ft tall version and then cut the tail

    • @stickmation656
      @stickmation656 7 лет назад +8

      Key dox that would be hard to clean up

    • @deadalpeca8099
      @deadalpeca8099 6 лет назад +12

      StickMation! It would be hard to make in the first place

    • @certifiedsnack6382
      @certifiedsnack6382 5 лет назад +2

      Thats called a bomb

    • @yinyang1217
      @yinyang1217 5 лет назад

      @@56independent42 not if ur behind unbreakable *_Glass_*

    • @erdmannelchen8829
      @erdmannelchen8829 5 лет назад +1

      Does a 30m long one serve too?

  • @flyingcod14
    @flyingcod14 4 года назад +3

    Never heard or even seen this before. Every day is a school day. Go Prince Rupert!

  • @kimbonice
    @kimbonice 10 лет назад +43

    Great vid! I'm laughing at the 452 dislikes on this. I'll never understand the people who aren't interested in science. You're missing out on a world of interesting things and adventure!

    • @Ctuchik
      @Ctuchik 10 лет назад +12

      Stupid people doesn't like to be reminded that they are stupid. :p

    • @kimbonice
      @kimbonice 10 лет назад +7

      Ctuchik Yeah and they continue to use smartphones and things like RUclips though, which we wouldn't have without science & the innovation it brings lol.

    • @kimbonice
      @kimbonice 10 лет назад +4

      andefghi The fact that you had to make a generic profile to make a comment that shows that you don't understand irony nor how something as simple as this contributes to the science behind the manufacturing of things is hilarious.

    • @Ctuchik
      @Ctuchik 10 лет назад

      andefghi Yay, way to turn a joke into an actual prof of point! :D

    • @SoulTouchMusic93
      @SoulTouchMusic93 10 лет назад

      Ctuchik don't! Oh, the irony! :)

  • @6double6.
    @6double6. 7 лет назад +58

    Hey just wanted to say...
    You need your own TV show. Like for real, I'm not joking one bit. It'd be on my list of favorite TV shows

    • @6double6.
      @6double6. 7 лет назад +1

      Do it and you're cool

    • @JacobHeronSound
      @JacobHeronSound 7 лет назад +13

      youtube is the new tv

    • @beautifulgirlmage
      @beautifulgirlmage 7 лет назад +3

      he's earning through youtube anyway

    • @SalahEddineH
      @SalahEddineH 7 лет назад +6

      +Blobs ! Agreed. RUclips is a much better platform for this. Everyone can watch on their own schedule, share, pause, clic links and annotations, and he can make videos on a more relaxed schedule too.
      I do see the praise in wanting a TV Show of this, and that's cool, it's just I feel like he doesn't even Need that anymore.
      Cheers! Keep getting Smarter Every day Guys!

    • @timm1139
      @timm1139 7 лет назад +9

      Bad idea, he'd then be under the thumb of some network & loose his control of schedule, ideas, content, creativity, everything. In short, it wouldn't be the SED that we know & love.

  • @maeckz84
    @maeckz84 11 лет назад +25

    Why are the glass fragments don't harm your fingers or skin while exploding? Aren't they sharp as hell?

    • @fist3484
      @fist3484 8 лет назад +7

      As Jackson said, this sort of 'break' sort-of just disintegrates the entire thing.

  • @sam_sibbitt6814
    @sam_sibbitt6814 4 года назад +8

    So you’re telling me that glass is breaking faster than 3,600 mph

  • @kristanorton2147
    @kristanorton2147 7 лет назад +20

    You would make an amazing science teacher! You make it easy to understand and a lot of fun. Keep em coming!

  • @TheUnusualSuspect101
    @TheUnusualSuspect101 7 лет назад +5

    Best explanation ever! Love the way you explain such complex scientific phenomena with creative and easy to understand methods. I feel bad for my Physics teacher now.

  • @somethingtojenga
    @somethingtojenga 10 лет назад +4

    Future mode of transportation--train car inside of a giant decompressing Rupert's drop.
    As you're inside, accelerating toward the Rupert's drop - "Railway ahead is warming up........ railway ahead is super-cooling....... explosive decompression in 3... 2... 1..."

  • @maskedmarvyl4774
    @maskedmarvyl4774 2 года назад +11

    Thank you for this demonstration. This actually led me to look up arch bridges and how they work, which are a marvel of early engineering and should be required reading in any introduction to engineering or physics course.
    Question: Is it possible to MELT off the tail of the Rupert's drop, without causing the shattering effect? Or would it still shatter?
    If you could have just the heads of the Rupert drops, wouldn't that have great ballistic properties, or is this manufacturing process already being applied to cellphone screens, just in a different manner?

    • @JetFalcon710
      @JetFalcon710 Год назад

      Someone posted a short where they melted the tail off a Prince Rupert's drop. It didn't explode, surprisingly, but the resultant blob of glass is still ridiculously strong and probably indestructible

  • @brianlarson4448
    @brianlarson4448 11 лет назад +50

    I wanna play with molten glass now... -_-

    • @snowythefoxxo
      @snowythefoxxo 8 лет назад

      The inside is molten but as soon as it touches the air it cools instantly

    • @Trainwreck4207
      @Trainwreck4207 7 лет назад +5

      SoliderCraft203 No, that is definitely not the case. A state of molten glass would require heat, which would be immediately transfered through atmosphere. It is completely cool.

  • @jerryye8404
    @jerryye8404 7 лет назад +8

    After all the explanations he did for the Rupert Drop. What I got was "hmmm, it's hard"

  • @Dartnix
    @Dartnix 5 лет назад +5

    4:00 this animation is everything

  • @granth4342
    @granth4342 4 года назад +5

    "Can you show me how to make a Prince Rupert's Drop?"
    "no"

  • @GreydonIselmoe
    @GreydonIselmoe 7 лет назад +13

    Wow... so the fracturing speed of Prince Rupert's Drop is Mach 4.83 ... Nuts.
    Imagine a jet flying that speed.

    • @xxzenonionnex7658
      @xxzenonionnex7658 5 лет назад

      There are jets that go mach 7+

    • @oofiousnien-thousand5923
      @oofiousnien-thousand5923 4 года назад

      @rockn roll Number 1: North American X-15 This aircraft has the current world record for the fastest manned aircraft. Its maximum speed was Mach 6.70 (about 7,200 km/h) which it attained on the 3rd of October 1967 thanks to its pilot William J. “Pete” Knight.

    • @samarthbhat7889
      @samarthbhat7889 4 года назад

      @@oofiousnien-thousand5923 yeah but that was more of a rocket

  • @TravisRichey
    @TravisRichey 10 лет назад +5

    This is fascinating! Thanks for the video, I had no idea that such a thing existed, but it's amazing to watch!
    ~Trav

  • @michaelmarage415
    @michaelmarage415 9 лет назад +9

    My question is, if you aged the Prince Rupert's drop, say, five years, would the energy dissipate, and the glass smash at point of impact?

    • @naphackDT
      @naphackDT 9 лет назад +1

      michaelmarage415 Probably.

    • @dlwatib
      @dlwatib 9 лет назад +1

      michaelmarage415 No. The only way for the energy to get released is for the glass molecules to move, and the molecules of solids don't move relative to each other. They expand and contract a bit when they heat or cool, that's it.

    • @naphackDT
      @naphackDT 9 лет назад

      dlwatib Glass is not really "solid".
      Ever seen 50-year-old windows? They are way thicker on the bottom than on the top.

    • @elmstfreddie
      @elmstfreddie 9 лет назад +11

      naphackDT That's just a myth. Old windows are thicker at the bottom because of inefficiencies in glass manufacturing.

    • @laurenceperkins7468
      @laurenceperkins7468 9 лет назад +10

      naphackDT If you got that much thickness change in a mere fifty years, then the glass artefacts found in Egyptian tombs from 2000 years ago should have been puddles on the floor. Further, fiber-optic communications lines which have tolerances measured in microns would not last any significant amount of time.
      50 years ago panes of glass were commonly made by pouring glass into a mold. In order for the air to escape the mold as the glass was poured, they were thicker at one end than at the other. Glaziers generally installed the panes with the thick edge down, however you will occasionally find panes that were installed "upside down" and are thicker at the top. Today we pour the molten glass onto a bed of molten tin to get the super-flat panes we use for our windows.

  • @haraldpettersen3649
    @haraldpettersen3649 5 лет назад +1

    It's "old", but one of the best videos you've ever made. When the drop explodes I think of the Big Bang.

  • @101mosioatunya
    @101mosioatunya 7 лет назад +4

    This is fascinating. Thank you for posting this. I really do feel smarter now.

  • @dunebasher1971
    @dunebasher1971 9 лет назад +367

    Science? In Alabama? You'll get chased out of the state for witchcraft.

    • @7th.Chosen
      @7th.Chosen 9 лет назад +6

      +dunebasher1971 rofl

    • @chinchella3
      @chinchella3 8 лет назад +8

      Well I guess you've never been to Huntsville, Rocket City :)

    • @deanthemachine96
      @deanthemachine96 8 лет назад +1

      +dunebasher1971 Well according to the book Destin referenced at the very end of the video, Exodus 22:18 would justify that and more.

    • @mahendrakrisnamurti9599
      @mahendrakrisnamurti9599 8 лет назад

      +dunebasher1971 then I suppose 793 people who watched this was from Alabama

    • @TheDarkGamerHG
      @TheDarkGamerHG 8 лет назад

      +Mahendra Krisnamurti im from Fairhope, Alabama

  • @AsherMaximum
    @AsherMaximum 9 лет назад +10

    I wonder what would happen if you shot the teardrop end with a gun? Would it still break from the tail end, with the tail cracking due to shock like it did when you hit it really hard with the hammer, or would the speed of the bullet be enough to overcome that, and actually break the drop end first?

    • @wongcayven9893
      @wongcayven9893 2 года назад

      Someone tried it and the bullet shattered on impact while the drop was slightly scratched

  • @4zap7
    @4zap7 2 года назад +1

    I know this video is old but I hope everyone is aware airborne glass particles can cause eye and lung damage. Let it settle or wear protective suits , still amazing video Dustin

  • @sammmo00
    @sammmo00 11 лет назад +14

    If the tail of the drop were melted off, would the drop then be indestructible?

    • @tDarkBrother
      @tDarkBrother 8 лет назад +7

      rskrny nop, it would shrink and release the tension procedurally, when melted it Will basically go back to the drop turning it in an common glass dropllet ,Sorry for the grammar, non native

    • @kamikazepiloot100
      @kamikazepiloot100 7 лет назад

      Nope. Then it wouldn't be called the Prince Rupert's drop anymore.

    • @flameshoter6
      @flameshoter6 7 лет назад +2

      shortening the tail at least would make it less vulnerable (unless you are intentionally attacking the tail then it would just be vulnerable.)

  • @Roby4B
    @Roby4B 11 лет назад +5

    This combination of principles and properties being explored and viewed at such high fps is like in itself art or animation that is so beyond awesome.. I really like the way you explain what is happening and why, step by step.

  • @TheMartinandLuisShow
    @TheMartinandLuisShow 10 лет назад +12

    I'm guessing the Death Star was built the same way.

  • @really296
    @really296 4 года назад +69

    3:25 that glass looks like homer simpson on so much Acid

  • @hoppermantis
    @hoppermantis 11 лет назад +15

    I would have liked to seen the tail supported in ballistic gel with only the "head" exposed for a hammer impact.

    • @mr.hydrogen3189
      @mr.hydrogen3189 7 лет назад +2

      hoppermantis interesting prospect

    • @dovblitz8472
      @dovblitz8472 4 года назад +1

      Hello random guy from six years ago

  • @Ucceah
    @Ucceah 9 лет назад +16

    now what would happen, if you roll motlen glass into a ball before dropping it into the water?
    hypothesis: an almost indestructable marble

    • @laurenceperkins7468
      @laurenceperkins7468 9 лет назад +11

      Cuda FX I believe it's called "tempered glass". It's used for quite a few things.

    • @Keinlicht
      @Keinlicht 9 лет назад +2

      Cuda FX Its not that you cant break the drop its just that the tail is so delicate it will always break first

  • @loririghteousness
    @loririghteousness 6 лет назад +4

    Science + humor =fun learning! This was awesome 👏🏼

  • @brasha78
    @brasha78 4 года назад

    Nearly 2000 dislikes I just don’t understand that. How could you dislike this video. Was it because he thought when making it they were the first ones to do it but we’re wrong I would be interested to find out why people disliked it. This is right up there with electrical theory and speed of light stuff. Thank you for the video.

  • @kriss1956
    @kriss1956 7 лет назад +4

    LOVE your videos, learned about the PR drop, NEVER stop learning! But, please, use airway protection too. Those shards are easy to inhale.

  • @Lunentucker
    @Lunentucker 8 лет назад +4

    At nearly mach 5, there has to be a small scale sonic boom with each one broken. Cool stuff!

  • @TheSeaofScience
    @TheSeaofScience 9 лет назад +29

    For the record, 1.03 mps is 3708 mph.

    • @TheEchelon
      @TheEchelon 9 лет назад

      uhm no its not

    • @Th3CoLoSSuS
      @Th3CoLoSSuS 9 лет назад +7

      The Echelon Except it is.

    • @TheFunnykid33
      @TheFunnykid33 9 лет назад +3

      The Echelon BlueLucario7 The Echelon
      3600 seconds in an hour
      1.03 meters per second x 3600 = 3708 meters per hour or 3.7 kilometers per hour (kinda slow really)
      where i think there is some confusion is in the "mph" which is an abbreviation used to express "miles per hour" but i think blue meant 'meters per hour'

    • @TheSeaofScience
      @TheSeaofScience 9 лет назад

      The Echelon It is 2.304 miles per hour.

    • @TheEchelon
      @TheEchelon 9 лет назад

      Alex Schmidtka You don't have to mention me twice bud. But yes I was wrong, I misread. I thought of the conversion of meter per second to kilometer per hour which is different. I stand corrected.

  • @a.p.5429
    @a.p.5429 2 года назад

    These videos never get old. I've shown everyone. Never gets old!

  • @VaibhavYawalkar
    @VaibhavYawalkar 4 года назад +5

    This explains the sudden explosion of bathroom glass door, when I stayed at one of the hotel. Only a mild external tension applied at the edge of door led to sudden explosion of door with similar minute glass particles.

  • @Yourmomsboyfriend666
    @Yourmomsboyfriend666 3 года назад +3

    I am also a huge fan of the song in this video! I'm going to download it now!

  • @1_____________________
    @1_____________________ 8 лет назад +109

    Is 1.03 miles/second the speed of sound in glass?

    • @danlorett2184
      @danlorett2184 8 лет назад +35

      +Spiked Blueshell No. It does depend on the type of glass, but the speed of sound in glass (also known as the speed at which compression waves travel) is around 4500 m/s, or about 2.8 miles per second - way faster than the failure front in the video. That's because the failure front due to the release of strain tension is not transferred as quickly as compression waves are in a material.

    • @TheVindicar
      @TheVindicar 7 лет назад +37

      +DeathMarch That's speed of sound in the air at normal conditions. Sound travels much, MUCH faster in solids.

    • @skyydott
      @skyydott 6 лет назад +15

      Sound travels at around 340 m/s in still air, around 1500 m/s in still water, and in iron it travels at around 5000 m/s. In diamonds, sound travels at 12,000 m/s, which is the fastest speed that sound can travel under normal conditions.

    • @larsvegas1505
      @larsvegas1505 6 лет назад +1

      that would make sound travel about 1 km every three seconds.. or about 4.5 per mile in normail air.. thats why when ur on a football field u can see the ball being kicked before u hear the thump..

    • @sherajussalehin7881
      @sherajussalehin7881 6 лет назад

      speed of sound in iron

  • @squawkback
    @squawkback 5 лет назад +1

    You're obviously too young to have experienced the Bell Telephone Science Series, which were 16mm films that were shown in schools in the late 50s. We got a brief exposure to Prince Rupert drops back then, but your experimentation really closes the loop on that. Thanks very much!

  • @981porsche3
    @981porsche3 4 года назад +11

    6:25, the tension’s killing me, lol

  • @gregparrott
    @gregparrott 7 лет назад +7

    Great video. But at 4:33, you incorrectly state that 13,000 psi represents twice the pressure at the bottom of Mariana trench. The density of salt water is 64 pounds per cubic foot and this force is applied upon 144 square inches. (i.e pressure increase per foot of depth is 0.444 psi). Google says the Mariana trench is 36070 feet deep. Multiplying the pressure increase per foot of depth times the depth... 0.444 * 36070 = 16,015psi. In other words, you're off by a factor of roughly 2.5 (16,015/6,500 = 2.464)

    • @andwilsaw
      @andwilsaw 6 лет назад +2

      Gregory Parrott you’re 4 years late bud. But.. umm... kudos for catching a mistake... I guess

  • @homiegisalive
    @homiegisalive 9 лет назад +10

    Is it possible to make a near perfect sphere-esque drop? If so that would be like a tear drop without the obvious weakness?

    • @homiegisalive
      @homiegisalive 9 лет назад

      ***** that's why i was wondering if it was possible lol, like if somehow it was spun and cooled from allsides immediately by water or if when it was about to drop that its tail was cut to mimic the other side before falling and then cooled all around

    • @AnimeSummit
      @AnimeSummit 8 лет назад

      +Moose Frenzy If you could get the molten ball of glass to drop without drooping at all, it could work, or if you hade some means of suspending it in air and quickly blasting it with cold water from all sides....
      So it's theoretically possible, but not really practical.

    • @homiegisalive
      @homiegisalive 8 лет назад

      Anime Summit i'd like to see someone try it tbh, it would be really interesting

    • @jordibear
      @jordibear 8 лет назад

      +me1970 I'm not even sure that is necessary. If you put it in a conducting canister of some sort and it could be suspended in a coil of copper pipe with some AC running through it, and once levitating, spun. this would heat it evenly.
      When heated sufficiently, switch of the AC current, plops into water.

  • @naeherbetrachtet
    @naeherbetrachtet 2 года назад

    you really give everything.. this acting as red grey and blue glass molecules was hilarious

  • @dopeytripod
    @dopeytripod 4 года назад +14

    it's 2019 and there are STILL little hidden shards of glass all over his face

  • @SebineLifeWind
    @SebineLifeWind 8 лет назад +11

    THAT WAS TOTALLY WICKED!!

    • @KN-hv7wb
      @KN-hv7wb 8 лет назад +6

      Did anyone else read this in the voice of the kid in The Incredibles? (You know, the kid who sees Mr. Incredible in his work clothes, when he's frustrated and picks up his car.)

    • @blahblahtoucan5329
      @blahblahtoucan5329 7 лет назад

      😂 yes

  • @edenfeathergreen8037
    @edenfeathergreen8037 9 лет назад +6

    If You cut the heated drop midair with a pair of scissors, so preserving the dropshape without a tail, would it be undestroyable through sheer force?

    • @404killer
      @404killer 9 лет назад

      +Eden Feathergreen dunno

    • @teapots4103
      @teapots4103 9 лет назад

      +Eden Feathergreen I had a similar thought...as if they made marbles, bullets, cannon balls out of this stuff it would make a great substance

    • @moodragonx2
      @moodragonx2 9 лет назад

      +Eden Feathergreen if you pay attention to the video you can see that's exactly what they're doing. They're "cutting" the tail (with some pliers). What's happening is essentially the same thing you get when you have a rubber band pulled really tight. Cutting it causes it to snap and release the energy.

    • @edenfeathergreen8037
      @edenfeathergreen8037 9 лет назад

      Nabil Zaman I wasn't talking about the already hardened drops, but the molten ones. So that when entering the cooling liquid/water it will be "tailless"

    • @gogo311
      @gogo311 9 лет назад

      +Eden Feathergreen You could just melt a piece of glass on a spoon so it would form a drop, then put the drop into cold water. Indestructable glass.

  • @bobDotJS
    @bobDotJS 2 года назад

    There's a reason this is one of my favorite channels on RUclips

  • @DanZhukovin
    @DanZhukovin 8 лет назад +6

    Now we know what inspired the creation of the Ford Pinto

  • @jagardina
    @jagardina 5 лет назад +7

    This is incredible. Hi, I'm new here, just subscribed.
    This would be an interesting experiment in micro gravity because you could make one of these things as a sphere rather than a drop. Imagine the strength if there's no tail!

    • @Tempusverum
      @Tempusverum 3 года назад +1

      Good observation. But putting a molten globe into floating water might be a challenge

    • @Sara-L
      @Sara-L 2 года назад +1

      @@Tempusverum You would need to squirt the water at the globe or blow them together somehow.

  • @kyaleshackelford9886
    @kyaleshackelford9886 7 лет назад +149

    who is prince rupert?

    • @karinak2444
      @karinak2444 7 лет назад +39

      He's the nephew of King Charles I and is said to be the first one that brought the glass oddities to England in 1660.

    • @Dave_Sisson
      @Dave_Sisson 7 лет назад +11

      A scientist, a cousin of King Charles II and a great general on the losing side in the English Civil War. There's a town named after him in B.C. Canada.

    • @owenmawhinney8793
      @owenmawhinney8793 7 лет назад +18

      A prince named Rupert

    • @-yeme-
      @-yeme- 7 лет назад +1

      he had a poodle theres a picture of it

    • @camn4941
      @camn4941 6 лет назад

      He invented this

  • @DeeRuss
    @DeeRuss Год назад +1

    That human demonstration was a trip 😂