NEET-UG Row: Supreme Court Questions Coaching Institute's Plea Filing

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 июн 2024
  • In a recent legal development, the Supreme Court raised concerns about the filing of a writ petition by Xylem Learning, a coaching institution assisting NEET-UG students. A vacation bench led by Justice Manoj Misra questioned the senior counsel representing Xylem Learning, asking, "What fundamental rights of yours are violated to enable you to maintain a writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution?"
    Join us as we delve into the details of this case, the implications for NEET-UG coaching centers, and the broader impact on students preparing for one of India's most competitive exams.
    🔔 Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe for more updates on educational news and legal insights!
    #NEETUG #SupremeCourt #XylemLearning #LegalNews #Education #CoachingInstitutes #FundamentalRights #Article32 #India #JusticeManojMisra #WritPetition
    The Supreme Court has questioned a Kerala firm, which coaches students for competitive examinations such as NEET through its app, for claiming violation of fundamental rights in its plea alleging discrepancies in the test for admission to medical colleges.
    This year’s National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), the result of which was declared earlier this month, has triggered a wave of protests with aspirants alleging large-scale irregularities, including paper leak. Several petitions have been filed demanding the test be scrapped, with questions raised over the role of the National Testing Agency that conducts the exam.
    "This is an Article 32 petition by an instance of a coaching centre. What fundamental right of yours is violated? You provide them coaching and your duty is discharged that is all," a vacation bench of justices Manoj Mishra and SVN Bhatti asked Xylem Learning on June 27.
    Writ petitions are filed under Article 32 only when the fundamental right of an individual is violated by governmental actions.

Комментарии • 23

  • @user-dk5rp6ey3b
    @user-dk5rp6ey3b 15 дней назад

    Chapter rha kijiyai

  • @superior5685
    @superior5685 15 дней назад

    Good work sir keep going❤

  • @living345
    @living345 15 дней назад

    Honourable SC may take strict decision against so called Coaching centres who always do anything in business purpose and emotional black mailing to inocent students.

  • @akashwadhwa7617
    @akashwadhwa7617 16 дней назад

    Bilkul sahi kha apna sir

  • @user-dk5rp6ey3b
    @user-dk5rp6ey3b 15 дней назад

    Aap KY a praishaani h

  • @Firdaus33277
    @Firdaus33277 16 дней назад

    Absolutely correct 💯 sir

  • @mankind2728
    @mankind2728 15 дней назад

    अब क्या ही कहें, समझ ही नहीं आ रहा कौन सही है और कौन गलत?

  • @superior5685
    @superior5685 15 дней назад

    We support you sir

  • @srishtisrivastava9421
    @srishtisrivastava9421 16 дней назад

    Bilkl shi kr rhe aap sir ❤❤❤❤

  • @mamtakaushik9404
    @mamtakaushik9404 16 дней назад

    Correct

  • @user-dk5rp6ey3b
    @user-dk5rp6ey3b 15 дней назад

    Km boliyai

  • @raghvendradsingh
    @raghvendradsingh 15 дней назад

    Suprim court is bais, any common person have capability to file PIL l
    I am against coaching, but if coaching r party in this case who stand to millions of poor students
    Supreme court is managed few advocates
    If these advocate wish they do every thing snd anything

    • @collegereviewunfiltered
      @collegereviewunfiltered  15 дней назад

      Standing by students and using courts for own promotion are two different things. Its easy for any one today like you to come and comment on supreme court coz they are the guardian of the constitution so refrain yourself from using such derogatory words as bias for the apex court and coaching institutions could have supported students who went to different courts by providing financial assistance and legal assistance but this way there was scope for personal branding and advertisement so they chose the other way to build narrative like xyzcoaching institution vs NTA .

    • @raghvendradsingh
      @raghvendradsingh 15 дней назад

      @@collegereviewunfiltered if coaching was not there, initially no one was stand with students. How any one imagine 12th pass student, apart belongs to village , poor, such condition more over lacs of rupee to File PIL by students. No social welfare agency so called cone forward to stand with such a huge scam. Many agencies / advocate even force to open SC in night, but million of student r in dilemma, can not sleep well
      If someone is trying to support , and getting own promotion what is harm
      Let think of students and parents
      Yes agree SC is guardian of constitution, no doubt but comment from honourable court should be considering situation of poorest of poor

  • @satyamrathour6249
    @satyamrathour6249 16 дней назад +1

    Ab chup ho jao

  • @saurabhtiwari9298
    @saurabhtiwari9298 15 дней назад

    Coaching institute bacho k sath leke kar sakte hi ......kyu k ye bache 18 saal k bache hai or ap janta hai ki jab jan k liye kam hota hai toh dusri party bhi bacho ka liyw assakta hai kyi ki har bacha Amir nahi hota and jar ek k maa baap nahi manta.....
    ....and most imp bacha khud itna bada na ho.....isi ki aad me nta khel raha hai ki bache bohot padha likha thee....Ye murkh bana rahe hai nta bacho ko dhoka deke kai farzi doctor bana raha hai

    • @collegereviewunfiltered
      @collegereviewunfiltered  15 дней назад

      Tabhi to bola ki bacho ko saath leke unko financial support kar sakte the but waisa karne se marketing karne ka mauka nhi milta kunki usme coaching institutions vs NTA karne ka mauka nahi mil paata .

  • @rajkasaudhan7080
    @rajkasaudhan7080 16 дней назад +1

    Reneet. All

    • @living345
      @living345 15 дней назад

      #No reneet all. Only justice