Thanks, Jacob. Any thoughts on sizing based on your portfolio max drawdown vs max drawdown of the individual strategies in the same portfolio? Suppose you have 4 strategies each with a max drawdown of 2k (so in total 8k), however, as an uncorrelated portfolio those 4 strategies have a max drawdown of only 5k; what size would you use 8k+margin or 5k+margin?
The sharpe ratio of that portfolio is too good to be true, that should have been a warning, making 400% in a steady fashion is just to good to last. It usually indicates that one is taking high risks that have to materialize at some point.
thanks for the reminders! having extra buffer for the real experienced drawdown before starting is probably good idea.
Deeply understand you're required capital to trade a portfolio and test martingale if it works for your risk profile/portfolio (doesn't work for me).
Hello Jacob, where can I get in contact with you? I have a question about the course
@@WalerWit Join my newsletter and reply to the email : codingtips.jacobamaral.com/join
Hey, has there been an update on subscription for the course
The course is a one-time payment for lifetime access, you can also spread the payment over 3 months.
Thanks for the video. Great info.
My pleasure!
Good ol fashion martingale, grid, recovery etc. just takes once
Thanks, Jacob. Any thoughts on sizing based on your portfolio max drawdown vs max drawdown of the individual strategies in the same portfolio? Suppose you have 4 strategies each with a max drawdown of 2k (so in total 8k), however, as an uncorrelated portfolio those 4 strategies have a max drawdown of only 5k; what size would you use 8k+margin or 5k+margin?
I'd use the bigger number, 8K+margin to be safe.
@@jacobamaralThanks, Jacob. I do the same but returns could increase significantly if one would size based on the portfolio.
Thats just a classic single logic grid+martingale.
Created to fail; only risk management is luck and withdraw.
The sharpe ratio of that portfolio is too good to be true, that should have been a warning, making 400% in a steady fashion is just to good to last. It usually indicates that one is taking high risks that have to materialize at some point.
True, if you can make 400% quickly you also can lose it just as quick.