i honestly hope Castillo spend all their money at this point, none of them really deserve that money. Im team Sidemen😂 the bag💰should stay with the boys, don’t care for any of these people brav!
I think for S2 they should just disband the whole voting system instead there should be points for each challenge they complete and add more challenges. This would cause them to take the challenges more seriously put there lives on there lines to win challenges like in the silent Library some these lot weren't even trying . The ones with highest points at end of certain duration wheter it may be 2 days or more get to stay and last one with the least points gets the kick.. this is just an idea btw they could modify and make changes to it to make it seem better
man said what leah and nife did, but not mentioning joe. he got voted out for confronting fanum about wasting funds and did the right call about the hair dryers etc. actually making an effort for less funds to be spent
"You got to play the game and if you play the game correct you come out on top and if you don't play the game you don't come out on top." - the problem is it doesn't matter who comes out on top if the winnings end up being 0. Imagine watching any game show(the chase, who wants to be a millionaire etc... any game show) and now imagine watching one of those where all of the contestants are throwing on purpose for the lulz. You'd find it funny for the first 20 minutes and then after that it it it just becomes a giant waste of time. Don't get me wrong, I love the concept and for the most part I love the show. But you won't persuade me or most other people that the system works because it clear as day doesn't. I still look forward to season 2 and I voice this criticism as constructively as possible.
I second the change in voting system. There should be protection to those who spent the least amount of money and then some days they can vote and you guys can open voting to the public without them knowing and that can override theirs. Something like that would make it more fair
but that will heavily incentivize to not spend. You need people to spend to make it interesting. 10 Leahs wont be entertaining, just like 10 Castillos wont be.
@@govinddas7876 not necessarily if they do it once randomly.. just to change the game a bit. Because it’s also not fair for the person who is spending the most to stay in the game
@@HelloMoto_ it is absolutely fair for the person spending most to stay in. Castillo spent the most, he did that sneakily. Would you have eliminated him first? No. He brought entertainment and content by spending.
No matter what you think about Castillo he’s not exactly lied, sure he’s lied to the people in there and you’d be pissed off if you were one of those once you found out. But at the same time he was honest with us all from the start. He told us his plan and he’s stuck to it
Facts also the other contestants aren't angels in there either they spend money on stupid stuff like a 42 year old man spending money on a cuddley toy. Also people seem to forget Chloe was the one who bought the guitar and keyboard ginge with the dartboard fanum with his hairbrushes and beachball and Joe with his pillow . No one there deserves it .. but I want brev to now spend it all
@@Brev-k9r nah I can understand the darts and pool cues etc, because that’s for entertainment everyone will use over the week, so that was a smart move from ginge at the start, however the rest I agree with
@@shroogs yeah that wasn’t the deal at the start/first few days, it was only after a few days when the Sidemen realised it was providing them with too much all day every day 😂
Was a bit of a fix not sending out Castillo for being voted out but you did Joe and Leah. Can't really say its luck when you guys just turned it into a mock vote just because of the result wasn't what you wanted.
EXACTLY, it's not fair at all for Joe and Leah, espeially Leah based on how she went out. It's not luck anymore when the Sidemen decide if a vote it's real or not based on who is voted out
@@connorwilson4357 imagine Castillo losing the rock, paper, scissors. Tobi most likely would have said: "I'm joking, nobody is leaving today". Yeah, very fair
Yep. It's obvious it's a split or steal situation. And they will likely have a game to recoup the prize pool. All the challenges have been more or less sidemen main video challenges in the past. I thought the series has been very mid. Cool banter and it's not a surprise that sidemen are rigging it so it can create more tension. But, imo. There were some easy things they could done from the beginning to make it so much better thay aren't unique ideas....like a mole, the two sidemen with the most red cards have to be locked in, etc etc.
@@cheetah219 nah it won’t be split or steal. The briefcase idea I said is different to split or steal. In split or steal, if you split, you have two winners but sidemen said there will be one winner. With the briefcase situation, there’s one winner
i think any public voting with influencers in the show would just be a bad idea. The person with the biggest fanbase will win 9 out of 10 times. someone with millions of followers already has millions of people who will vote for them, compared to someone with 100k
I think the way you can get everyone’s trust and be well liked IS to spend a bit. Shows that you’re human, and if you admit to it like specs does? You’ll gain their trust and become well liked from both sides of the spectrum (the frugal side/ the spender side). Leah and Joe were serious about the game and it got them voted out
episode 5 was def the best so far, also I prefer more of them in the house bantering and fucking about than the challenges, but challenges are still good
No way castillo said "im gonna flort with girls and snake em" brev he looks like he just snorted 50 lines florting with that man probably feels like an interrogation.
tbf I like ginge and fanum there, they are spending money but still not overly spending it (especially fanum) and they are also pretty funny. Although there is no one that deserves to win anymore as Leah is gone.
Live sidemen Sunday can never happen because they pre record it. They record it on like Weds. or Thurs. I’m pretty sure LOL jeeeze man let the mandem have their Sundays
@@shroogs I’m sure he did a challenge that wasn’t on, also I’m sure Leah had one aswell , where did that go? Us being confused like this shows the edits have been shit they had a week to edit aswell not like it’s the next day
you're just being slow lmao. He already had a shop token you melt. Leah left you mug, why tf would she use it after getting voted out?? You being a dense mong isnt the editors fault. The part they cut out is a 4 minute hide and seek where Ginge won and it had no further consequences so they didnt put it on the YT cut.
I think Ginge brought up an interesting concept with “working with the Sidemen” maybe next season you could have an “Imposter” or maybe even other roles assigned from the beginning of every day leading up to elimination and then they are randomized again.
The vote system is just an internal popularity contest and people have clearly discussed with friends who to vote for. I understand public vote wouldn’t work but it needs to change for S2 because it’s so unsatisfying when everything else is so great. Either internal voting between the highest 3 spenders or protection for the lowest spenders. That way it adds another layer to spending and saving money
Agreed, I feel like Joes head was ready to burst, meaning some solid content which we won’t get now. I also feel like it needs to be longer than a week personally
The issue was that some were friends BEFORE coming on. Which renders the internal dynamic quite pointless. With random people, it's not the biggest issue and part of "making allies". Protection doesn't NEED to associate to spending, they had "MVPs" with protection for winning the games for the first elimination. Which I think is a better system. And you insert people that actual care about money or simply the sense of competition itself, that would address more of the spending issue.
@@ns-iv8ku the protection from the games felt weirdly chosen like when Fanum gets protection for eating a fish filled doughnut which seemed way easier than half the foods on the table
@@sahelahmed9839that’s on the producers to create scenarios that are entertaining. Also as people spend longer in there they will begin to struggle more and may want to spend more
I think sidemen should vote too, that way there would be some unbiased votes, or maybe votes should be voting on the two worst performers in the challenges that day something like that
They kinda did by providing the immunity but saving them over and over would be a bad look tbh. Just gotta let it play out how it plays out. The people voting for Leah knew she would win if she made it in the end.
it would be cool if it was like bigbrother where theres a rule they cant discuss eliminations, who they're voting for etc would defo be interesting to see for S2 how ambiguous voting would go when no one knows who's gonna vote for who, no teaming against others etc
A “RUclips group Olympics” would be sick!! Kinda like the “Disney channel games” back in the day if you remember 😂 have like 4-6 different RUclips groups and do a bunch of challenges where each group nominates who represents their team for each challenge. Could be a multiple video thing or a live event like the charity game
when you realize it'd be far more entertaining if there was actual temptations and punishments instead of just laughing at fanta and sweets like a 12yr old, you'll start realizing how bad it is
For season 2, I think instead of just doing votes, have a challenge between two chosen people, loser goes out, or weakest member in a challenge gets eliminated, that could be interesting
Yeah, Josh, you didn't vote Joe and Leah out cuz they did. But they also did vote out Castillo, so why is he still in the game? I don't it's fair if you decide who is going out based on who is voted. Especially Leah, going out because of a Rock, paper, scissors game while Castillo is still there even he was voted by all.
@@erenyeager3974 Maybe the Sidemen should just stop giving BS explanations when everyone know it's rigged. Just admit you wanted to keep Castillo in and it's ok.
ik its very sad but sidemen just have to keep castillo cuz he will be spending lots of money. Ofc they let Leah go because she didnt spend any and even tho sidemen are rich, they cant afford giving like over 200k to the winner
The idea is that they drain the money though, meaning Sidemen lose out on less and that’s also the one thing that can piss people off very easily. Wouldn’t work if they rewarded people for not spending
@@jackford762 The most conservative spenders being the FIRST two out isn't a good thing for the game nor the show in general. They should at least have an initial system where people like Leah & Joe who spend little don't get kicked out right away, and then towards the end of the show things can get more intense. Playing the game right shouldn't get you evicted right out the gate out of all 10 people playing.
@@dewritos2068 there’s no right or wrong way to play the game tho? Some are there purely for the money, others are there for a mixture of money and the friendship etc. Joe was the perfect example of that
Why do people keep saying this has never been done before? Maybe from the sidemen it's the first time and yeah the money concept is different but it's just locked in but one week, not two. Plus big brother is basically the same thing. If they said *we've* never done it before then fair play but its not a new idea 😂
Heard people talking like it’s an original idea, it’s just what footasylum have been doing for a few year now. Fair play to you boys for doing it, I’ve not watched any not my thing. Reception seems to be good.
brev
Brev
i honestly hope Castillo spend all their money at this point, none of them really deserve that money. Im team Sidemen😂 the bag💰should stay with the boys, don’t care for any of these people brav!
Should do a season 2 in America, speed in one would be crazy asf 😂
Its not looking good brev
show sucks
"Can I get two fanta lites brevv"😂
season 1 hasnt even fully came out and i already want a season 2
That’ll be neat brev
Real bro
I just hope if they do a season 2, they bring back Leah and Joe
@@WillHellmmnah joe aint funny and leah did deserve better but doesnt deserve to be on next season
@@WillHellmm Joe is not it bro
Never knew Fanta lite existed before Inside
this is the first time i’ve ever heard a sideman mention RDCWORLD! i would pay for that. Please make it happen
Bro Mark would be HILARIOUS 😂
@@M__FO Dylan too that shit would be funny asl
I’m a 28 year old man and I actually cheered out loud when he mentioned RDC
I feel like the last episode will be a split and steal
If it isn’t they messed up 😂
It might be ...that's the best way to settle it honestly or maybe another challenge
Split and steal for what? There no funds left fam
I think for S2 they should just disband the whole voting system instead there should be points for each challenge they complete and add more challenges. This would cause them to take the challenges more seriously put there lives on there lines to win challenges like in the silent Library some these lot weren't even trying . The ones with highest points at end of certain duration wheter it may be 2 days or more get to stay and last one with the least points gets the kick.. this is just an idea btw they could modify and make changes to it to make it seem better
Also please pick contestants that aren’t friend with each other on the show
man said what leah and nife did, but not mentioning joe. he got voted out for confronting fanum about wasting funds and did the right call about the hair dryers etc. actually making an effort for less funds to be spent
Hes not gonna shag you m8
Castillo should have been out, outrageous, he has bigger plot armor than marvel superheroes
Plot armour 😂😂😂
mad video brevvvv
"You got to play the game and if you play the game correct you come out on top and if you don't play the game you don't come out on top."
- the problem is it doesn't matter who comes out on top if the winnings end up being 0.
Imagine watching any game show(the chase, who wants to be a millionaire etc... any game show) and now imagine watching one of those where all of the contestants are throwing on purpose for the lulz. You'd find it funny for the first 20 minutes and then after that it it it just becomes a giant waste of time.
Don't get me wrong, I love the concept and for the most part I love the show. But you won't persuade me or most other people that the system works because it clear as day doesn't. I still look forward to season 2 and I voice this criticism as constructively as possible.
speak for yourself and not others lmao. Clearly its working for the majority from the numbers.
9:44 the Crew!
I second the change in voting system. There should be protection to those who spent the least amount of money and then some days they can vote and you guys can open voting to the public without them knowing and that can override theirs. Something like that would make it more fair
That will make it boring tho
but that will heavily incentivize to not spend. You need people to spend to make it interesting. 10 Leahs wont be entertaining, just like 10 Castillos wont be.
@@govinddas7876 not necessarily if they do it once randomly.. just to change the game a bit. Because it’s also not fair for the person who is spending the most to stay in the game
@@HelloMoto_ it is absolutely fair for the person spending most to stay in. Castillo spent the most, he did that sneakily. Would you have eliminated him first? No. He brought entertainment and content by spending.
No matter what you think about Castillo he’s not exactly lied, sure he’s lied to the people in there and you’d be pissed off if you were one of those once you found out. But at the same time he was honest with us all from the start. He told us his plan and he’s stuck to it
Facts also the other contestants aren't angels in there either they spend money on stupid stuff like a 42 year old man spending money on a cuddley toy. Also people seem to forget Chloe was the one who bought the guitar and keyboard ginge with the dartboard fanum with his hairbrushes and beachball and Joe with his pillow . No one there deserves it .. but I want brev to now spend it all
@@Brev-k9r nah I can understand the darts and pool cues etc, because that’s for entertainment everyone will use over the week, so that was a smart move from ginge at the start, however the rest I agree with
Imagine them not spending at all how booring would that be😂
@@jackford762nah ginge said the darts and pool stuff they took and would have to pay for each day
@@shroogs yeah that wasn’t the deal at the start/first few days, it was only after a few days when the Sidemen realised it was providing them with too much all day every day 😂
Was a bit of a fix not sending out Castillo for being voted out but you did Joe and Leah.
Can't really say its luck when you guys just turned it into a mock vote just because of the result wasn't what you wanted.
EXACTLY, it's not fair at all for Joe and Leah, espeially Leah based on how she went out. It's not luck anymore when the Sidemen decide if a vote it's real or not based on who is voted out
@@CosmiinBtn bet they were chuffed when Castillo won the rock, paper, scissors 😂
@@connorwilson4357 imagine Castillo losing the rock, paper, scissors. Tobi most likely would have said: "I'm joking, nobody is leaving today". Yeah, very fair
They must have already had a plan of having a fake vote and revealing the voters on the third go. It's on the people inside who they vote out when
@@CosmiinBtn 😂
Here me out season 2 inside - sidemen are contestants and the currents contestants control it
Have better contestants please for the next one, or just stick with amongus
The last episode will be a briefcase with the money and the other person has to choose which briefcase they want
Yep. It's obvious it's a split or steal situation. And they will likely have a game to recoup the prize pool. All the challenges have been more or less sidemen main video challenges in the past.
I thought the series has been very mid. Cool banter and it's not a surprise that sidemen are rigging it so it can create more tension. But, imo. There were some easy things they could done from the beginning to make it so much better thay aren't unique ideas....like a mole, the two sidemen with the most red cards have to be locked in, etc etc.
@@cheetah219 nah it won’t be split or steal. The briefcase idea I said is different to split or steal. In split or steal, if you split, you have two winners but sidemen said there will be one winner. With the briefcase situation, there’s one winner
they should make the voting system like big brother, where the house votes and the 2 with the most votes gets into an audience voting
Cant work with a pre recorded show.
i think any public voting with influencers in the show would just be a bad idea. The person with the biggest fanbase will win 9 out of 10 times. someone with millions of followers already has millions of people who will vote for them, compared to someone with 100k
Inside but the cast are the sidemen
I think the way you can get everyone’s trust and be well liked IS to spend a bit. Shows that you’re human, and if you admit to it like specs does? You’ll gain their trust and become well liked from both sides of the spectrum (the frugal side/ the spender side). Leah and Joe were serious about the game and it got them voted out
Need inside with real everyday people, if the “hate” is the only worry then just get adults who can deal with it
I don't get why they are only an hour long, when sidemen Sunday's are around 2 hours long, inside surely has more content
If there was an inside sidemen edition, JJ out first would be so jokes. He would do as well.
episode 5 was def the best so far, also I prefer more of them in the house bantering and fucking about than the challenges, but challenges are still good
No way castillo said "im gonna flort with girls and snake em" brev he looks like he just snorted 50 lines florting with that man probably feels like an interrogation.
where does he stream?
Bobby Lee in Inside S2 would go crazy ngl
This deserves more recognition
Way too much of a loose cannon lol would be hilarious though
Grabbing balls all over
Specs and Bobby Lee woulda been a duo
You need to sign off for the Sidemen to come to Aus bro
In a s2 make sure the face the 123 in the chase
Episodes were to long for me tbf rest was peak
Santander bruv
Zerkaaaa ❤❤🎉
Get a storror member on for s2😂
Ggs
I wonder if they could use AI to speed up this logging process...
I hope castilllo spends all the money now. Hate everyone inside fr
tbf I like ginge and fanum there, they are spending money but still not overly spending it (especially fanum) and they are also pretty funny. Although there is no one that deserves to win anymore as Leah is gone.
@@tompsu9536Fanum literally spent 50K on temptation + Dyson hair products.
Live sidemen Sunday can never happen because they pre record it. They record it on like Weds. or Thurs. I’m pretty sure LOL jeeeze man let the mandem have their Sundays
Charity matches are live
@@b3an3rgvngaw3 has nothing to do with anything I said LOL
@derekrules17 its a live sidemen Sunday when they do a charity match?
big brothers so good at it’s partially live😭😭
I’m a Sideman, get me outta here
How u ever gon top season 1 brev
Can we get a Forfeit Blind Date 2 brev?
AJ shabeel, pie face, Lauren alexis and deji would be great for season 2
Bro I’m telling you rn he is going to spend ALOT. TMRW IT WONT BE IN THE HUNDREDS NO MORE JUST BECAUSE OF BREV
We need an official brev counter
Fanta light bruv
All these staff and the edit was shit, u need new editors how has Ginge won a McDonalds with no context how?
He had a shop token right from a previous episode?
@@shroogs I’m sure he did a challenge that wasn’t on, also I’m sure Leah had one aswell , where did that go? Us being confused like this shows the edits have been shit they had a week to edit aswell not like it’s the next day
He did the challenge with Manrika hitting 20 on the dart board, so he used the 10k he won on McDonald’s for the team
you're just being slow lmao. He already had a shop token you melt. Leah left you mug, why tf would she use it after getting voted out?? You being a dense mong isnt the editors fault. The part they cut out is a 4 minute hide and seek where Ginge won and it had no further consequences so they didnt put it on the YT cut.
get castilo on among us brev
I think Ginge brought up an interesting concept with “working with the Sidemen” maybe next season you could have an “Imposter” or maybe even other roles assigned from the beginning of every day leading up to elimination and then they are randomized again.
That actually makes sense
This is actually a great idea ngl
brev
It would be fun if they could pay to see the purchase history 😂
The vote system is just an internal popularity contest and people have clearly discussed with friends who to vote for. I understand public vote wouldn’t work but it needs to change for S2 because it’s so unsatisfying when everything else is so great.
Either internal voting between the highest 3 spenders or protection for the lowest spenders. That way it adds another layer to spending and saving money
Issue with that is it’ll get boring after the people who spend are out
Agreed, I feel like Joes head was ready to burst, meaning some solid content which we won’t get now. I also feel like it needs to be longer than a week personally
The issue was that some were friends BEFORE coming on. Which renders the internal dynamic quite pointless. With random people, it's not the biggest issue and part of "making allies". Protection doesn't NEED to associate to spending, they had "MVPs" with protection for winning the games for the first elimination. Which I think is a better system. And you insert people that actual care about money or simply the sense of competition itself, that would address more of the spending issue.
@@ns-iv8ku the protection from the games felt weirdly chosen like when Fanum gets protection for eating a fish filled doughnut which seemed way easier than half the foods on the table
@@sahelahmed9839that’s on the producers to create scenarios that are entertaining. Also as people spend longer in there they will begin to struggle more and may want to spend more
i cant stand castillo mans insufferable
I think sidemen should vote too, that way there would be some unbiased votes, or maybe votes should be voting on the two worst performers in the challenges that day something like that
They kinda did by providing the immunity but saving them over and over would be a bad look tbh. Just gotta let it play out how it plays out. The people voting for Leah knew she would win if she made it in the end.
Should be a fan vote for one person to be replaced with someone that was eliminated aka Bring Weller back sack off Manrika
I am so fucking glad you mentioned rdc when talking about youtube groups, they are ogs of this shit
it would be cool if it was like bigbrother where theres a rule they cant discuss eliminations, who they're voting for etc
would defo be interesting to see for S2 how ambiguous voting would go when no one knows who's gonna vote for who, no teaming against others etc
We all know you didn't get rid of castello because if the drama, not very fair when u pick and choose who really leaves and who doesn't
A “RUclips group Olympics” would be sick!! Kinda like the “Disney channel games” back in the day if you remember 😂 have like 4-6 different RUclips groups and do a bunch of challenges where each group nominates who represents their team for each challenge. Could be a multiple video thing or a live event like the charity game
The credits put it in perspective
When people realize the whole point of the show is to make the contestants spend as much as possible, you’ll start enjoying the show 😂😂
No it’s not that shows how thick the contestants are. And shows how dumb you are 🧐🤔😂
There wasn’t even any nudging needed though. Sweets and fanta lite? Really?
@@connormcchicken59152 Fanta lites brev
when you realize it'd be far more entertaining if there was actual temptations and punishments instead of just laughing at fanta and sweets like a 12yr old, you'll start realizing how bad it is
When you realize how thick these idiots are and then realize how thick you are. Then you’ll realize that’s the demographic for show enjoyment
i really liked the interviews with the people who worked on the show in the first episode side+
For S02 Deji, Danny, Specs, Jynxzi. Maybe Ginge again!
For season 2, I think instead of just doing votes, have a challenge between two chosen people, loser goes out, or weakest member in a challenge gets eliminated, that could be interesting
that would make the game too challenge focussed. There needs to be a balance.
@@066kshitizvsingh4 I’m not saying for every elimination, just to mix things up, you need some more jeopardy imo
Yeah, Josh, you didn't vote Joe and Leah out cuz they did. But they also did vote out Castillo, so why is he still in the game? I don't it's fair if you decide who is going out based on who is voted. Especially Leah, going out because of a Rock, paper, scissors game while Castillo is still there even he was voted by all.
Womp womp
@@erenyeager3974 stop the glazing
@@erenyeager3974 Maybe the Sidemen should just stop giving BS explanations when everyone know it's rigged. Just admit you wanted to keep Castillo in and it's ok.
ik its very sad but sidemen just have to keep castillo cuz he will be spending lots of money. Ofc they let Leah go because she didnt spend any and even tho sidemen are rich, they cant afford giving like over 200k to the winner
I think they did it because it was a unanimous vote. If anyone else got a unanimous vote, I think they would have done it too.
It's definitely a moresidemen video it shouldn't take over a sidemen Sunday
Please do something with RDC i would love that bruh they are my favorite youtube group
Leah spend £200 when she spent the cap thing during the trivia thing where if u get it wrong you get poured by a substance
HOW DO THE SIDEMEN KNOW ABOUT GOOD GOOD???
Where the fuck is harry?
Good one
for season 2 could you change it to reward people not spending money
The idea is that they drain the money though, meaning Sidemen lose out on less and that’s also the one thing that can piss people off very easily. Wouldn’t work if they rewarded people for not spending
@@jackford762 The most conservative spenders being the FIRST two out isn't a good thing for the game nor the show in general. They should at least have an initial system where people like Leah & Joe who spend little don't get kicked out right away, and then towards the end of the show things can get more intense. Playing the game right shouldn't get you evicted right out the gate out of all 10 people playing.
@@dewritos2068 i agree
@@dewritos2068then they decided to let the biggest spender stay even though the whole house anonymously voted for him. Inside scam mate
@@dewritos2068 there’s no right or wrong way to play the game tho? Some are there purely for the money, others are there for a mixture of money and the friendship etc. Joe was the perfect example of that
Yes Josh i need an Optic x Sidemen collab please!!!!
This please!
if they got speed in a season that would be insane
You should Collab with the Nelk boys for content & Your drinks 💯🔥
Why do people keep saying this has never been done before? Maybe from the sidemen it's the first time and yeah the money concept is different but it's just locked in but one week, not two. Plus big brother is basically the same thing. If they said *we've* never done it before then fair play but its not a new idea 😂
We need more brev
Heard people talking like it’s an original idea, it’s just what footasylum have been doing for a few year now. Fair play to you boys for doing it, I’ve not watched any not my thing. Reception seems to be good.
Brev let me get a fanta light brev confirmed brev
Love you ZERKAA
Who wants castillo in a sdmn sunday!!!!
We need a season with only lads (pause). The females bring 0 content and funny moments