lol everytime someone uses tmux and has it located on the bottom then they open up nvim and they have lualine across the bottom as well, it just erks me
Hello, I've seen your let's build a soc live stream. Why haven't the been a part two it was absolute fire! I'm currently working on my thesis and that would help a lot fr
This is a really great question! DTrace is quite similar to BPFTrace (in fact, Brendan Gregg literally wrote the book on both!). However, as I understand it, DTrace is scoped to just the predefined tracepoints, without the more flexible probes that eBPF makes available. Additionally, I believe the method of writing the programs and loading them into the kernel is different, but I am certainly no expert on BSD.
@@TheTaggartInstitute I'm no expert either, but I enjoy Bryan Cantrill's talks so I'm familiar with the ideas of Dtrace at a conceptual level. I know Dtrace has its own scripting language similar to eBPF, which makes sense if Brendan Gregg worked on both projects in some way. I do think you're correct about the instrumentation methods though. I'm not sure if Dtrace is as flexible as eBPF.
I have just started to get into it. Thank you for showing us some really cool programs your wrote.
Very useful and well-presented. Thank you. I am taking baby-steps in Rust-Aya. Clips like this are fantastic aid.
😊
lol everytime someone uses tmux and has it located on the bottom then they open up nvim and they have lualine across the bottom as well, it just erks me
Great Video! Thank you for sharing!
very nice video, I really liked this video apart from others
Great to see your content again
hey man what OS are you using and is it inside a VM ? have a good one!!! and thank for all the good content
Hello, I've seen your let's build a soc live stream. Why haven't the been a part two it was absolute fire!
I'm currently working on my thesis and that would help a lot fr
Great work thank you
We know it's COOL
How does this compare to dtrace from the bsd side of things?
This is a really great question! DTrace is quite similar to BPFTrace (in fact, Brendan Gregg literally wrote the book on both!). However, as I understand it, DTrace is scoped to just the predefined tracepoints, without the more flexible probes that eBPF makes available. Additionally, I believe the method of writing the programs and loading them into the kernel is different, but I am certainly no expert on BSD.
@@TheTaggartInstitute I'm no expert either, but I enjoy Bryan Cantrill's talks so I'm familiar with the ideas of Dtrace at a conceptual level. I know Dtrace has its own scripting language similar to eBPF, which makes sense if Brendan Gregg worked on both projects in some way. I do think you're correct about the instrumentation methods though. I'm not sure if Dtrace is as flexible as eBPF.