this is The Most iconic watch to me. When i first got into watches, this is the one i knew i had to own. My words cannot express what this watch is to me, grail of grails
@@PALWE not all dials have it. It was a batch of dials and even during those production years (2012-2016) not all of them had the error. So are they super rare? Probably not. Are they more rare than normal? Yes. Considering this watch is no longer made and already hard to come by, it makes sense. And btw, we are not talking about a huge well known error, which explains the price difference from the non APH dial variants. I’ve seen like 20% more. Consider the flat four Kermit, now you’re talking double. So I’m not sure why haters try to down play it but the reality is the rareness of the error is directly explained by this pricing difference. If it was more rare like a flat four, you’d see the 116520 selling for close to 10.000€ more, which it isn’t, so I think the market has spoken and in terms of comparing rarity in dials, it’s already taken into account. My 2 cents. Have a nice day !!
I have a stainless steel Daytona with box and papers hardly ever worn with only one person as a previous owner to the watch how much do you think that would be valued at
Nicer than the ceramic.
Sure
this is The Most iconic watch to me. When i first got into watches, this is the one i knew i had to own. My words cannot express what this watch is to me, grail of grails
You got one? I do , white dial
@@PALWE APH black dial here!! Wear it in good health !!
@@Ivy_Robins most are aph dials , grey dealers hype it up .. they’re common. I have aph dial too
@@PALWE not all dials have it. It was a batch of dials and even during those production years (2012-2016) not all of them had the error. So are they super rare? Probably not. Are they more rare than normal? Yes. Considering this watch is no longer made and already hard to come by, it makes sense. And btw, we are not talking about a huge well known error, which explains the price difference from the non APH dial variants. I’ve seen like 20% more. Consider the flat four Kermit, now you’re talking double. So I’m not sure why haters try to down play it but the reality is the rareness of the error is directly explained by this pricing difference. If it was more rare like a flat four, you’d see the 116520 selling for close to 10.000€ more, which it isn’t, so I think the market has spoken and in terms of comparing rarity in dials, it’s already taken into account. My 2 cents. Have a nice day !!
Mate use Handcream!!!
Price ?
A lot of Rolexes look gauche and gaudy and overdone but this one is magnificent. Great looking timepiece.
The sexiest watch ever made. Period.
f series, why would it have chromalight lume?? must be a new dial and handset and not original
when I saw the chromalight I was like wtf???? Maybe another 116520?
116520 had blue chromalight from 2014 until discontinuation in 2016!
Thanks, Tim. You are one of the best. I can tell you are an amazing Gentleman. Kudos.
I have a stainless steel Daytona with box and papers hardly ever worn with only one person as a previous owner to the watch how much do you think that would be valued at
I wondered whatever happened to the Micro Machines spokesman!
I love my sub but this is such a lovely looking watch. Maybe I will have to get one 🤔
I have one 👍 love it
j'adore
Put some gloves or fix those dry hands!
If this watch was a woman, it would be the famous "brickhouse" f/The Commodores song.
Henry West I think if the Daytona were a woman it’d be more like Olivia Wilde. I initially thought Charlie’s Theron but Olivia takes the cake.
I think it is ugly and overpriced even at retail! If my AD offered it to me I would immediately flip it!
Ian Arnold dude you can’t afford it, sour grapes
Lol please wear your gshock and let the big boys worry about Rolexes
I would flip it to buy the gold version.