Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Meta to end availability of news in Canada permanently
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 июн 2023
- The social media giant Meta says it will end access to news on its social media sites for all Canadians in response to Bill C-18, the Online News Act. Rachel Curran, head of public policy at Meta Canada says 'the way the bill is drafted does not allow for negotiations outside the framework of the legislation.'
»»» Subscribe to CBC News to watch more videos: bit.ly/1RreYWS
Connect with CBC News Online:
For breaking news, video, audio and in-depth coverage: bit.ly/1Z0m6iX
Find CBC News on Facebook: bit.ly/1WjG36m
Follow CBC News on Twitter: bit.ly/1sA5P9H
For breaking news on Twitter: bit.ly/1WjDyks
Follow CBC News on Instagram: bit.ly/1Z0iE7O
Subscribe to CBC News on Snapchat: bit.ly/3leaWsr
Download the CBC News app for iOS: apple.co/25mpsUz
Download the CBC News app for Android: bit.ly/1XxuozZ
»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
For more than 80 years, CBC News has been the source Canadians turn to, to keep them informed about their communities, their country and their world. Through regional and national programming on multiple platforms, including CBC Television, CBC News Network, CBC Radio, CBCNews.ca, mobile and on-demand, CBC News and its internationally recognized team of award-winning journalists deliver the breaking stories, the issues, the analyses and the personalities that matter to Canadians.
Should ban Meta as a whole. Spare us 🙄
Government over-regulation caused this problem in the first place with C-11 and C-18, now you want further government censorship?
Ban this, ban that, censor this, censor that. How about blanket freedom for all?
The corrupt authoritarian Trudeau regime is the problem not META
@@Wade56 I was being sardonic.
this is like we walk into bar and demand the bartender to tip us the customer LOL
No. It's a rogue corporation from another country where you never wanted to go in the first place, making gigantic profits-off : 1) Your entire political & socio-cultural ecosystem. 2) The private data of your country's citizens.
this is probably better for everyone
Damn right! I'm glad our gov't stood tall against these American tech giants.
But 42 you loved the government propaganda?you got 3jabs and P100
@@arkoutarkout3654 I got 3 jabs? Who told you that?
@@fortytwo244 you are still allowed to access social media ?
@@fortytwo244 I bet you are still using a mask 👺 not for covid , this time
Good, this 'news' overload is depressing us, less is more. Let them go.
The corrupt authoritarian Trudeau regime is the problem here
👋 Good. Facebook and other social media companies have been the single most destructive tool to how people see and interact with eachother and society
The corrupt authoritarian Trudeau regime is the villain in this story, Einstein.
I support Meta. Conservatives already are subscribed or follow news on different platforms. Not a big deal for us at all. Conservative media is thriving.This is a money grab on the behalf of failing legacy media which no one is interested in anymore. We warned you for years, and were ignored. The government and the legacy media are running out of money as a consequence.
Says the guy who ventured their way over to legacy media, gave views and a commented on a legacy media video
@@simpletown323 simpleton from simpletown inside your head
Remember that time that Facebook (Meta) weighted the "angry" reaction *five times as heavily* as the "like" reaction when choosing what content to show us? Facebook should face a class action lawsuit for the damage they've done by psychologically manipulating the population for the sake of engagement on their platform.
100%!!!!!
@@SummerSausage1 Who says WE are using it?
Or just don't use it like most folks
Or people are responsible for fact checking on their own instead of believing everything online. Your mindset is what lead to C-18 and authoritarian Nanny State government.
@@SummerSausage1 That's akin to saying you voluntarily use a phone. Doink.
The idea that Facebook would pay to put Canadian news on Facebook is preposterous. The idea that Trudeau thinks Canadians are being bullied because he can’t sell his crap media to the social media sights Canadians use.
could we ban the service entirely?
You just love to see it.
By the way did she just admit they only moderate content in about 54% of languages facebook supports?
I think that is pretty widely known. It heavily moderates english content cause it's an english based company. Stuff from some places in like the middle east and asia has less people capable or trained to moderate those regions
Good riddance.
The corrupt authoritarian Trudeau regime is the villain we want to get rid of, Einstein
Rachel Curran is a former Conservative advisor
Lol, now I get to see and read even LESS Canadian content in my social media feeds. Well done ! Lol
This legislation hurts Canadian publishers more so than Meta. If anything, all content creators want users to share their content across all social media platforms. I am very curious how news outlets feel about this.
They want to get paid for their content when it's used on another platform, that's the entire point of the legislation, to get Facebook to pay for the content they're using to make money, because they aren't as it stands right now.
I agree that Canadian publishers are in for a world of hurt.
@@swooper74 how much do you imagine Meta makes off hosting Canadian content?
@@swooper74, who do you think this will hurt more, Meta or Canadian publishers?
No it doesn’t.
Stand up for Canadians, sure.
Rachel don’t let the door hit you in the butt on your way out. I banned Facebook years ago.😊
Seriously? All this drama with social media just shows how much power it has over people. Just leave Facebook/Meta. You'll be alright, if not better. I was on their platform since 2008 and I closed my account during covid. Yes, during isolation I shut off Facebook. I haven't missed it or looked back. I have so much more time now for meaningful things in my life, meaningful interactions with people, and much less anxiety. Most of all I don't have Zuckerberg controlling my life one way or another. One down, a few more to go.
You dont understand why its being done in the first place. No one cares about FB or Meta. It's Trudeau trying to control everything once again.
So basically you are VOLUNTARILY posting on a platform.. and then DEMANDING to get paid for it, that's a good way to create a business, but unfortunately it doesn't work like that. I FULLY SUPPORT META
Regardless of whether the bill is a good idea, the fact a private Corp. Has so much control over Canadian news I disturbing.
Meta .. for 'news' 😂😂😂😂
I look for news on Meta like i do on Fox ... 😎
@@RonWuerch you really can't lump CBC in with Fox. CBC has - as far as I'm aware - never argued in court that no reasonable viewer would take its hosts at their word. Fox has. CBC has also never ran a deliberate disinformation campaign regarding election results on behalf of a politician. Fox has. Fox is the propaganda arm of the Republican Party (as was demonstrated during the Dominion lawsuit's discovery phase), whereas CBC maintains editorial independence through Canada's Broadcasting Act and oversight of an independent ombudsman.
"No government has involvement or influence on the journalism of CBC News and Radio-Canada Info, our French-language service. CBC's editorial independence is enshrined in Canada's Broadcasting Act, and also its publicly available journalistic standards and practices (JSP), to which the news divisions are held accountable by independent ombudsmen."
Do you have any reputable sources indicating that CBC is deliberately dishonest or acting behalf of a political party? I've heard Peter Mansbridge explain the editorial independence, so it'd also be great if you could provide me with a decent reason not to trust him on that matter.
Hmm a musician plays in a venue. The musician gets a cut; the venue gets a cut. Simple. Therefore, anyone who posts, likes, or even comments provides value so much so that Facebook demands ownership of our posts , pics, etc. Like the musician we enhance the success of a venue/platform like Facebook and should get a cut. Now before you argue that we post voluntarily, the fact is we the people” own the airwaves not corporations. So in this case the government is representing us. FYI there are platforms that pay those who post, like or comment on the blockchain.
Due to the end of availability, I have not shown any display of my life on Facebook other than what is on the news media that had any meaning for myself, due to the fact they make and charge for my personal pictures. Facebook will reduce its significance for Canadians.. It's used by Meta and is ridiculous. . This isn't workable.
LOL BRILLIANCE 🇨🇦🌹🫅🤔🇳🇿 -Thankful of DownUNDER🫅🇳🇿
See Canada, taxes and service fees shun all our competition away. We are then left with monopolies in every service and trade
Why Canada not doing similar process that other western counties handle freedom of expression (I don’t see our allies doing this heavy regulations)
That's good. I am paying Globe and Mail. They deserve the money. I am happy to finance good newspapers.
Me too
I rarely agree with Meta and Google, but I have to say they are making the right decision here.
Proof your intellectually impaired.
Why do you think they should use the work of Canadian companies for free? Do you hate Canada?
@@thirstbuster78 I believe that this is a civil matter between the social media companies and the news providers. I believe in a free-market economy where those parties can come to their own arrangements. The social media companies are elevating the news providers to some extent and that aspect of the value of the service they provide was completely ignored.
@@thirstbuster78 the idea that they are 'using' Canadian content is manufactured non-sense. They are providing huge value by carrying those news outlets on their platforms for free. I hope they both discontinue that practice however.
@@thirstbuster78 By "USE" you mean CBC posting their stories on their free facebook page to get people to watch more of their propaganda?
It's the news companies like CBC that USE meta.
Great news! Thank you Meta.
"The rules of how the legislation is applied can't affect how the legislation is applied," is an interesting argument. Almost like it's not a real argument, and just an excuse they're using for PR or something.
Australia was the Guinea pig.
This is the same, meta lied.
The corrupt authoritarian Trudeau regime is the villain here
I like the interview but would of loved a follow up question from her comments on Meta being expose to liability. What liabilities is Meta concerned that they will be exposed to?
Read the bill. They are liable for paying of anything designated as Canadian news and forced to negotiate a payment. It's very difficult to screen out some content while letting very similar content through. This bill is ridiculous.just like the others passed by the liberals
*how about we get paid a monthly amount of say 300 dollars for selling my personal identity, you say that i can use the app and thats the price to pay, but i say the app payes for itself and you are selling my ID and making billions, its time we all eat!*
Meta respecting the law... The gall.
spell misinformation ... C - B - C
Wow, she seems like a real peach. 😂
Good on Meta! This is a step in the right direction.
Paying for content thats posted by users on your platform is not a viable or sustainable business practice. Its like paying for rain if it hits your lawn.
Well, who still cares about facebook? Fewer and fewer people are using it anyway. When i look for the news, i only go for youtube
Guess what, google does not like c18 either and may follow suit. Pablo is to blame entirely for this situation
Yay! Actual news! Actual participation in community!
Good stuff
Finally. We get to hear the other side of the story & how this piece of legislation is different from other countries.
Most Meta traffic is bots anyways, they can afford to pay.
This is aging well.
Good . We don’t need news from them.
Mets is evil
Great!
"We don't need no education." Thank goodness the government can think for us.
I really hope that the government was smart and included a provision against this in the bill. Meta has been telegraphing this for a very long time.
The corrupt authoritarian Trudeau regime is the villain here
#TELEGRAFH Is NOT 🚫 The FUTURE ‼️
Suuuuure they will.
This bill is like instead of paying the paperboy to distribute your newspaper you're charging The Paperboy, that, not only distributes your newspaper, but hand-deliver it to each individual and flipped it to the exact page they would like to read first. Why the media lobbied for this law I have no idea. You can't have your cake and eat it too
Since when is a $116 billion company a 'paperboy' that's in middle school or highschool and works part time for summer cash
@@funny573ff I thought you're supposed to pay people on the service they provide lol, as well as the extra revenue provided by the service. There gonna miss that revenue
@@justinventelaB can pay then, and in the process they should start paying users from their $32 billion ads revenue for using their data
@@funny573ff RUclips does along with many other platforms, and users arent forced to use Facebook, they can always send snail mail to send there messages lol
@@funny573ff
Canada passed C-18 to force companies like Meta and Google to pay the Canadian news networks to display their articles. Google and Meta just said they aren't paying anything.
Before this law, Google and Meta gave Canadian news agencies a free platform to blow up their articles' viewership = $$ for the canadian news company.
TDLR: they aren't blocking anything, like this misinformation video is telling you. You can always type in the URL, but who does that anymore...
Money over consumers. Typical big American tech monopolies
Good.
So glad I deleted all my social media accounts during the pandemic, life has done nothing but get better since. 😘
Good for you to make that choice, government shouldn't decide for everyone else. They caused this with authoritarian C-11 and C-18.
This is social media here... dah
@@Luxembourgish What a steamin' pile a horse crap you're peddlin'
@@Luxembourgish If you get your news from Meta, that's your fault, not the government's.
@@scarecrow2275 I don't, but it's not the governments place to legislate causing website to back out. Especially after C-11 to censor this very site per its section 4.2
Good riddance! Who needs Meta when there are so many more options to get news from.
No news is good news
Though I do think it’s silly to end news sharing if linking to the direct source as we’ve heard that sharing/linking won’t likely even be allowed, I do agree all these third party “news” sites taking reported news and investigations and regurgitating it do need to pay up. More than half the time these sites don’t even link sources, so it’s come to this…
F*** Meta! Lol. 🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦
Do you support the corrupt authoritarian Trudeau regime?
This actually helps Canadian news more. Now people will be forced to actually visit the news websites
Yeah if you think that's going to happen I have a bridge I want to sell you.
Were you smoking weed and high when you posted this comment? Better go n check health of your head.
@@SummerSausage1 Yes, sausage brain, the majority do get their news from source, TV, news print, & right here at RUclips just as you're doing right now.
Yep. Just picked up globe and mail, looking for others..
@@d.r.tweedstweeddale9038You are calling other people sausage brain yet you have no understanding of what your are talking about. You said people get their news from the source and then in the same sentence you mention one of those being a social media platform!RUclips is not going to recommend people Canadian news channels, your Google search results will not show Canadian news sources. You will have to directly visit the news websites by typing in their url manually it is not going to come up in Google or Facebook searches or feeds. You are just like the clueless lawmakers that act bold but don't realize what they are doing is worse for everyone.
Why are you putting news on Facebook? I don’t belong so I find it incredible,where people get their news from!
Another awesome legislation no one wanted.
That is excellent news. We should have done this long time ago
We ? They banned our news, not the opposite. 😂
No one uses social media for traditional news anyways and if you do, lol. Social media is for social news, what's going on in your and others social circles.
Dirty, what's next, Fox Canada? eff ewe.
Because they do not want to pay people for their work 🤦♂️
That's not why at all
Why should google pay anything? If news outlets offer their content for free that's their problem. They can charge a subscription, if they are any good they might get some subscribers.
Canada is doomed
No loss for meta users
No company should be larger than a country. Canda should take bold step.
You can't coerce people and companies to bend to your will. The gov can pass legislation, but they can't force companies to remain in Canada. Look at stellantis, kinder morgan, and now meta
The corrupt authoritarian Trudeau regime is the villain here
wut? what is your IQ level?
Canada passed C-18 to force companies like Meta and Google to pay the Canadian news networks to display their articles. Google and Meta just said they aren't paying anything.
Before this law, Google and Meta gave Canadian news agencies a free platform to blow up their articles' viewership = $$ for the canadian news company.
TDLR: they aren't blocking anything, like this misinformation video is telling you. You can always type in the URL, but who does that anymore...
Canada did take a bold step. This is the result. Something about being careful what you wish for.
Cut them off. It’s garbage anyways.
Meta equals greed.
FJT
Why would we cap the amount of compensation for media companies? That would kneecap the media companies, especially the smaller ones.
Well, I do understand they should pay for posting of news. However, it is their right to decide to not allow those posts on their system. I don't like it, I like sharing news and so on Facebook. However, it's a free service and they own the systems, they should be allowed to decide that they don't want to pay for this and will remove the content. Again, I don't like it but it is their property.
Gonzo - can i post copyrighted movies and music on your website and you just deal with the repercussions? ;) ;)
Perhaps they could work with the news agencies and while letting people get a peek, users would eventually hit the pay wall for X publication?
Why do "I" have to find solutions all the time!
Calgon - take me away!
sure me deleting my account of facebook...go ahead..
Good Riddence! Meta...
If CBC shares it's own links to Facebook, and Facebook would have to pay CBC a fee for that?
Ridiculous law.
@@SummerSausage1Of course.
No, you confuse that, it’s when others share their content. The very way facebook makes its revenue. The simple and reasonable demand is that news agencies get an appropriate portion of that as a basic requirement. It’s not like Facebook even pays a reasonable level of taxes here. Guess it is time we very strictly enforce our tax laws and remove every possible loophole.
@@TheTechnoPilot paying for "links" is a ridiculous concept and we should not accept that as a free society.
When a user shares a link to a news article to Facebook, their friends see it and some of them click on it. The news agency website receives the traffic and can display ads to it. Some newspapers charge to read articles (Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, New York Times). These companies need to find a way to make money from their website without leeching off of other successful companies for some type of ransom.
Tfw crazy they could pay up ez
This doesn't sound good at all and the way it's being presented is a bit revolting. Of course, details are important and the whole picture is not clear but there are definitely reasons for concern.
GOOD RIDDANCE!!
Yeah Youre BETA OFF 💯%‼️ #KEEP_DA_BILL👑
FAFO - Build your own platform
Media gets free marketing via meta
Government mandates $
Meta says no
Gov says they are bully's.
Wtf
Right? Literally wtf
The Minister is hilarious!
Pay your way Meta!
The corrupt authoritarian Trudeau regime are the villains in every story, Einstein
A ton of bots in the comments of this video.
Bill C-69, Stellantis, kinder morgan and now Meta. Why would any businesses invest in 🇨🇦?
Meta doesn't want to pay for something the Government is forcing them to pay. So yeah, wise choice to simply not allow any news on the platform. Meta 1 - Canadian Gov. 0
Sounds like a bunch of political posturing and did the Citizens vote or have a say in it? What a joke🤷🏻♀️
"Did the citizens vote or have a say in it?" Well, they elected the government that passed the legislation. We don't generally do referendums in Canada, though that's something I wouldn't mind seeing more of.
Liers
Why are you "standing up for Canada" in this instance when you buckle on everything else?
because 💰💰💰
I can only assume you mean the government, so please do tell we’re you think they have buckled for Canadians at all?! At best I see them not being strict enough on oil and environmental policies where we need far stricter regulations as of yesterday with a 15 year plan to end all non-green/carbon neutral energy generation and extraction country wide.
Ridiculous
Awww Poor Meta.
Poor Canada, we suffer the corrupt authoritarian Trudeau regime.
What? Meta is mitigating their losses by not having to pay out for liabilities. They're not losing anything. You have it backwards my friend
Considering just 3 city’s in the USA have more daily users of Meta then all of Canada combined. Trudeau regime doesn’t have a strong position in this. Canada is an insignificant country in the digital world.
Canada represents 0.45% of total users for Google and 0.57% of Meta total users. Lmfao 😂
Meta is dead anyway, so who really cares.
Their stocks don’t think so.
@roumensp yeh, Zuckerberg is probably buying back his own stock and they still have no revenue growth. Plus they're mainly relying on tik tok to generate revenue. (If the app gets banned, they die.)I also read that employees are paid in stock. That has got to benefit their market value, without any real market value or growth.
Stand up to CORPORATE AMERICA. They don't want to follow Canadian laws? No problem. We don't need Meta.
All Canadian news channels should be ban on youtube as well…
This reporter doesn"t know how to take NO for an answer. PS anyone under 40 knows FB was dead 10 years ago.
So what the point of Canada if we even let Meta walk all over us.
Bye 👍
Goodbye Facebook. You have at least one less customer.
Are you going to say goodbye to google as well?
The corrupt authoritarian Trudeau regime are the villains
They should remove Facebook out of Canada like the US is intending to do with Tiktok. They are not willing to compensate the publishers in this market but they would make concessions in others. It's all money at the end of the day they care fors. Shame on them. It keeps getting worst and worst in the public's eye all over the world.
No one forces these media outlets to use Facebook in the first place. They do so voluntarily with the understanding that they WON’T be compensated. They’re free to leave. This won’t end well for news outlets
You really love big daddy government telling people how to live their lives.
So it's basically a company complaining they have to pay people for work they did
Meta and Google are providing a free service to our news outlets, by distributing them pretty much everywhere. The news outlets can charge a subscription if they wish, many do.
Canada needs to diversify immigration. Not just from a few countries