Hadith is the reason Islam is intact. You remove Hadith and give 20 years, you'll see hundreds of sects, each practicing their own version of Islam. Astaghfirullah.
@FawadBilgrami Is it ? When don’t you obey the ahadith… You’re worshiping Iblees. Here this what your garbage Hadith tell you It was narrated that Anas bin Malik said: "The Messenger of Allah said: 'Allah has His own people among mankind.' They said: 'O Messenger of Allah, who are they?' He said: 'The people of the Qur'an, the people of Allah and those who are closest to Him.'" You’re a dead duck 🤣🤣 Al Quran is MUBEEN and MUFASSAL !!! The Quran the best Hadith !!!! Got study before start talking trash. People are you are the destroying the best deen on this planet !
@@Titan-ub5op we follow the Isnad as taught in the, Quran 9 : 100... back to Allah and His Messenger peace and blessings be upon him, why are you so blind is the right question!
@@Titan-ub5op The companions of the Prophet Muhammad, themselves followed the sunnah of Prophet Muhammad. The students of the companions followed the sunnah, their descendants and the earlier generations followed the sunnah and the hadith. Whom are we to deny, save those fabrications.
@Mehamed kaddih What about when Allah says in surah Ta Ha ayah 9: "Wa hal ataaka hadeethu Musa?" meaning, "has the story of Moses reached you?" you people don't even know Arabic well enough to refute the authentic Ahadith we have of the Prophet (saw). Hadith can refer to any story or narration.
@@TheQuranExplainsItself He's not old enough to be called sheikh by that meaning. How would you address a well learned individual grounded in knowledge etc. I. E Ibn Taymiyyah Rahimahullah or Ibn jawziyyah Rahimahullah??
@@abuhudaifah_0 unless I’m acquiring a service from him I’d call him by his name. If he’s providing a service I’d call him by the title pertaining to that service.
Allah o Akbar... Allah (SWT) truly blesses those who strive in his true path. Mashallah Brother Adnan's efforts to study truly is so beneficial for us muslims. May we strive to study like him about our faith and history
Thank you, Br. Adnan. This video is quite timely since recently, there has been a number of Hadith Rejectors coming on, commenting on the British Muslim Channels.
JazakAllahukhairan brother, very informative as usual. You’re a joy to listen to. May Allah SWT Bless you for your hikmah and good intentions. Allahumma Ameen 🌹
*11 Simple Questions for Traditional Muslims:* *1)* Why is there not a SINGLE place in the entire Quran where a secondary scripture & divine revelation called the “Sunnah” or “Prophetic Hadith” is mentioned? Doesn’t the Quran constantly claim that it is clear & straightforward? *2)* Why do the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” appear over and over again throughout the Quran, yet never ONCE refer to what traditional Muslims use them as? (as the inspired words & teachings of the Prophet); if there is actually a second scripture ordained by God called the Hadith, isn’t this quite deceptive and misleading? *3)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of itself and it’s perfect guidance, lack of contradictions, and promise of its preservation, and so on, yet make NO such claim about the Hadith? Wouldn’t we expect that the Quran adds the phrase “ والسنة” (‘and the Sunnah’) in these verses where the Quran alone is mentioned? *4)* Why does the “Sunnah” contradict the Quran in so many ways? For example, so-called “Sahih” Hadiths tell us that tiger and other animals are forbidden to eat, whereas the Quran is manifestly clear that the ONLY four prohibited foods are carrion, blood, pig’s meat, and idol-offerings. Or for example, Sahih Hadiths tell is that the Prophet will be an intercessor on Judgement Day for those in his Ummah who committed MAJOR sins, whereas the Quran clearly states that anyone who commits major sins and fails to repent will be condemned to Hell, and will have no protector, intercessor, or savior. How can these teachings be a “commentary” on the Quran (as sunni Muslims claim) when they blatantly contradict it? *5)* Why do you say that the Sunnah (as supposedly preserved in the Hadith) is a commentary on the Quran, when you know that the Hadith is actually just a bunch of isolated sayings and doings of the Prophet and his companions, with less than 1% actually being direct commentary on the Quran? How can you claim this especially when considering the massive disagreement amongst traditional sects and scholars when it comes to Hadith-based theology, as well as numerous clear & major contradictions between the Quran and Hadith as shown above? *6)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of the Torah and Gospel, as well as the Psalms and other scriptures of God-and call these “guidance” and “beacons of light”-while no such honorable mention is ever made of the supposed SECOND REVELATION that God allegedly sent down to the Prophet, which was the inspired Sunnah? How could God fail to prioritize mentioning the Hadith-which is supposedly REQUIRED for understanding the Quran itself-yet constantly mentions the amazing wonder & authority of the previous scriptures & revelations which we aren’t even required to follow anymore? *7)* If we got rid of the Quran and just kept all the Hadith, don’t you think that the current traditional religion of Islam would still be perfectly intact? In other words, isn’t the Hadith alone sufficient for nearly everything you need to practice traditional Islam in its current form? What then is the need for the Quran under this framework? What other essential use does it provide that the Hadith cannot? And isn’t this why the Muslim scholars of the past admitted “the Quran is in more need of the Sunnah than the Sunnah is in need of the Quran”? *8)* Why is there such a massive difference between the structure of the Quran and Hadith if they are both indeed co-equal legally-binding divine revelations brought down by God? For example, the Quran is preserved word-for-word, whereas the Hadith is only preserved meaning-to-meaning; the Quran is unique in style and incredibly easy to memorize & recite, whereas the Hadith is clearly human literature and was not made for easy memorization; the Quran is recited during worship, while the Hadith is not; and the list goes on. If both were equally divine revelations of God, why is this the case? Yet isn’t this exactly what we we’d expect if people FASELY attributed another work of literature as being revelation alongside the one true revelation? (Ex. like the Talmud was done to the Torah by the Jews) *9)* If you were to give a copy of the Quran to an unbiased stranger who spoke fluent classical Arabic, and had them read the Quran for the first time, from beginning to end, and with no other source of information-would they come back to you confused and puzzled, and be asking you for the secondary scripture & co-divine revelation called the “Prophetic Sunnah & Hadith” that they were allegedly supposed to read about in the Quran? *10)* We already know that the previous generations before us who were given scripture & guidance by Allah (SWT) went far astray and added all sorts of falsehoods and fake traditions to their religion, including the Talmud of the Jews (who also claim that it contains traditions of Moses as commentary of the Torah) and the writings of Paul & the Church, whom the Christians have given precedence over Jesus’ own words and have thereby begun to worship the Trinity and hold other false beliefs. With this in mind, shouldn’t we be wary that we TOO might also have gone astray from the pure teachings of God in the Quran? Wouldn’t it be foolish and careless of us to ignore the warnings of Allah (SWT) about the history of people of the scripture, and thus fail to consider that we might be deviating from the right path just as they did? *11)* Finally, what WOULD the Quran actually have to say for you to accept that it is the only revelation brought down from God to the Prophet? The Quran already says COUNTLESS times that it is clear & lucid, sufficient for guidance, detailed & self-explanatory, unmatched & supreme, and perfectly preserved-so what else could the Quran then possibly say for you to finally give up and realize that it is what it claims to be? I hope you will think about these questions sincerely. Salam.
@@MASSAM9669 The Quran was initially revealed to the Prophet Muhammad (Quran 47:2), but is talking to all peoples of all generations for all time to come (68:52, 2:21, 7:35, 76:29, 17:9)-just as is befitting of a universal message revealed by the All-Knowing & All-Wise Creator of the universe, who perfectly knows the past, present, and future. Now, how does that in any way answer even a single one of my questions above? If I supposedly have a “poor understanding” (simply by asking common-sense questions, it seems), then you should have no trouble at all answering those 11 questions of mine with great ease, and defending your position. So instead of asking me random unrelated “counter question” that you perhaps think will trap me in a ‘gotcha’ moment, I would much rather you actually DEAL with the heart of this issue about the Sunnah/Hadith’s reliability & authority by ANSWERING my precise questions. So please, carefully consider them with an open mind and objective lens, and come back if you have a meaningful response. Peace.
@@celestialknight2339 Ye i disagree with that, i believe its secondary to everyone after, many verses clearly prove this With your understanding, I could see why you would reject hadith, but its just not right...neither logically nor textually
*11 Simple Questions for Traditional Muslims:* *1)* Why is there not a SINGLE place in the entire Quran where a secondary scripture & divine revelation called the “Sunnah” or “Prophetic Hadith” is mentioned? Doesn’t the Quran constantly claim that it is clear & straightforward? *2)* Why do the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” appear over and over again throughout the Quran, yet never ONCE refer to what traditional Muslims use them as? (as the inspired words & teachings of the Prophet); if there is actually a second scripture ordained by God called the Hadith, isn’t this quite deceptive and misleading? *3)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of itself and it’s perfect guidance, lack of contradictions, and promise of its preservation, and so on, yet make NO such claim about the Hadith? Wouldn’t we expect that the Quran adds the phrase “ والسنة” (‘and the Sunnah’) in these verses where the Quran alone is mentioned? *4)* Why does the “Sunnah” contradict the Quran in so many ways? For example, so-called “Sahih” Hadiths tell us that tiger and other animals are forbidden to eat, whereas the Quran is manifestly clear that the ONLY four prohibited foods are carrion, blood, pig’s meat, and idol-offerings. Or for example, Sahih Hadiths tell is that the Prophet will be an intercessor on Judgement Day for those in his Ummah who committed MAJOR sins, whereas the Quran clearly states that anyone who commits major sins and fails to repent will be condemned to Hell, and will have no protector, intercessor, or savior. How can these teachings be a “commentary” on the Quran (as sunni Muslims claim) when they blatantly contradict it? *5)* Why do you say that the Sunnah (as supposedly preserved in the Hadith) is a commentary on the Quran, when you know that the Hadith is actually just a bunch of isolated sayings and doings of the Prophet and his companions, with less than 1% actually being direct commentary on the Quran? How can you claim this especially when considering the massive disagreement amongst traditional sects and scholars when it comes to Hadith-based theology, as well as numerous clear & major contradictions between the Quran and Hadith as shown above? *6)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of the Torah and Gospel, as well as the Psalms and other scriptures of God-and call these “guidance” and “beacons of light”-while no such honorable mention is ever made of the supposed SECOND REVELATION that God allegedly sent down to the Prophet, which was the inspired Sunnah? How could God fail to prioritize mentioning the Hadith-which is supposedly REQUIRED for understanding the Quran itself-yet constantly mentions the amazing wonder & authority of the previous scriptures & revelations which we aren’t even required to follow anymore? *7)* If we got rid of the Quran and just kept all the Hadith, don’t you think that the current traditional religion of Islam would still be perfectly intact? In other words, isn’t the Hadith alone sufficient for nearly everything you need to practice traditional Islam in its current form? What then is the need for the Quran under this framework? What other essential use does it provide that the Hadith cannot? And isn’t this why the Muslim scholars of the past admitted “the Quran is in more need of the Sunnah than the Sunnah is in need of the Quran”? *8)* Why is there such a massive difference between the structure of the Quran and Hadith if they are both indeed co-equal legally-binding divine revelations brought down by God? For example, the Quran is preserved word-for-word, whereas the Hadith is only preserved meaning-to-meaning; the Quran is unique in style and incredibly easy to memorize & recite, whereas the Hadith is clearly human literature and was not made for easy memorization; the Quran is recited during worship, while the Hadith is not; and the list goes on. If both were equally divine revelations of God, why is this the case? Yet isn’t this exactly what we we’d expect if people FASELY attributed another work of literature as being revelation alongside the one true revelation? (Ex. like the Talmud was done to the Torah by the Jews) *9)* If you were to give a copy of the Quran to an unbiased stranger who spoke fluent classical Arabic, and had them read the Quran for the first time, from beginning to end, and with no other source of information-would they come back to you confused and puzzled, and be asking you for the secondary scripture & co-divine revelation called the “Prophetic Sunnah & Hadith” that they were allegedly supposed to read about in the Quran? *10)* We already know that the previous generations before us who were given scripture & guidance by Allah (SWT) went far astray and added all sorts of falsehoods and fake traditions to their religion, including the Talmud of the Jews (who also claim that it contains traditions of Moses as commentary of the Torah) and the writings of Paul & the Church, whom the Christians have given precedence over Jesus’ own words and have thereby begun to worship the Trinity and hold other false beliefs. With this in mind, shouldn’t we be wary that we TOO might also have gone astray from the pure teachings of God in the Quran? Wouldn’t it be foolish and careless of us to ignore the warnings of Allah (SWT) about the history of people of the scripture, and thus fail to consider that we might be deviating from the right path just as they did? *11)* Finally, what WOULD the Quran actually have to say for you to accept that it is the only revelation brought down from God to the Prophet? The Quran already says COUNTLESS times that it is clear & lucid, sufficient for guidance, detailed & self-explanatory, unmatched & supreme, and perfectly preserved-so what else could the Quran then possibly say for you to finally give up and realize that it is what it claims to be? I hope you will think about these questions sincerely. Salam.
@@celestialknight2339 instead of asking your many questions with contradictions, answer this one question on why you contradict yourself, Qur'an says follow hadith so why you reject it. Quran 6 :89 - They are those whom We gave the Book, Al-Hukm (understanding of the religious laws), and Prophethood. But if these disbelieve therein (the Book, Al-Hukm and Prophethood), then, indeed We have entrusted it to a people (such as the Companions of Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) who are not disbelievers therein.
@@Titan-ub5op can you stope copying and pasting the same cut and paste of Qur'an , its very ignorant of you! Qur'an does mention other revelations with it, see Qur'an 6 : 89!
see this verse on explanations of the Prophet peace & blessings on him (sunna) w/ Qur'an 16 : 64 - And We have not sent down the Book (the Qur'an) to you (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم), except that you may explain clearly unto them those things in which they differ, and (as) a guidance and a mercy for a folk who believe.
*11 Simple Questions for Traditional Muslims:* *1)* Why is there not a SINGLE place in the entire Quran where a secondary scripture & divine revelation called the “Sunnah” or “Prophetic Hadith” is mentioned? Doesn’t the Quran constantly claim that it is clear & straightforward? *2)* Why do the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” appear over and over again throughout the Quran, yet never ONCE refer to what traditional Muslims use them as? (as the inspired words & teachings of the Prophet); if there is actually a second scripture ordained by God called the Hadith, isn’t this quite deceptive and misleading? *3)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of itself and it’s perfect guidance, lack of contradictions, and promise of its preservation, and so on, yet make NO such claim about the Hadith? Wouldn’t we expect that the Quran adds the phrase “ والسنة” (‘and the Sunnah’) in these verses where the Quran alone is mentioned? *4)* Why does the “Sunnah” contradict the Quran in so many ways? For example, so-called “Sahih” Hadiths tell us that tiger and other animals are forbidden to eat, whereas the Quran is manifestly clear that the ONLY four prohibited foods are carrion, blood, pig’s meat, and idol-offerings. Or for example, Sahih Hadiths tell is that the Prophet will be an intercessor on Judgement Day for those in his Ummah who committed MAJOR sins, whereas the Quran clearly states that anyone who commits major sins and fails to repent will be condemned to Hell, and will have no protector, intercessor, or savior. How can these teachings be a “commentary” on the Quran (as sunni Muslims claim) when they blatantly contradict it? *5)* Why do you say that the Sunnah (as supposedly preserved in the Hadith) is a commentary on the Quran, when you know that the Hadith is actually just a bunch of isolated sayings and doings of the Prophet and his companions, with less than 1% actually being direct commentary on the Quran? How can you claim this especially when considering the massive disagreement amongst traditional sects and scholars when it comes to Hadith-based theology, as well as numerous clear & major contradictions between the Quran and Hadith as shown above? *6)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of the Torah and Gospel, as well as the Psalms and other scriptures of God-and call these “guidance” and “beacons of light”-while no such honorable mention is ever made of the supposed SECOND REVELATION that God allegedly sent down to the Prophet, which was the inspired Sunnah? How could God fail to prioritize mentioning the Hadith-which is supposedly REQUIRED for understanding the Quran itself-yet constantly mentions the amazing wonder & authority of the previous scriptures & revelations which we aren’t even required to follow anymore? *7)* If we got rid of the Quran and just kept all the Hadith, don’t you think that the current traditional religion of Islam would still be perfectly intact? In other words, isn’t the Hadith alone sufficient for nearly everything you need to practice traditional Islam in its current form? What then is the need for the Quran under this framework? What other essential use does it provide that the Hadith cannot? And isn’t this why the Muslim scholars of the past admitted “the Quran is in more need of the Sunnah than the Sunnah is in need of the Quran”? *8)* Why is there such a massive difference between the structure of the Quran and Hadith if they are both indeed co-equal legally-binding divine revelations brought down by God? For example, the Quran is preserved word-for-word, whereas the Hadith is only preserved meaning-to-meaning; the Quran is unique in style and incredibly easy to memorize & recite, whereas the Hadith is clearly human literature and was not made for easy memorization; the Quran is recited during worship, while the Hadith is not; and the list goes on. If both were equally divine revelations of God, why is this the case? Yet isn’t this exactly what we we’d expect if people FASELY attributed another work of literature as being revelation alongside the one true revelation? (Ex. like the Talmud was done to the Torah by the Jews) *9)* If you were to give a copy of the Quran to an unbiased stranger who spoke fluent classical Arabic, and had them read the Quran for the first time, from beginning to end, and with no other source of information-would they come back to you confused and puzzled, and be asking you for the secondary scripture & co-divine revelation called the “Prophetic Sunnah & Hadith” that they were allegedly supposed to read about in the Quran? *10)* We already know that the previous generations before us who were given scripture & guidance by Allah (SWT) went far astray and added all sorts of falsehoods and fake traditions to their religion, including the Talmud of the Jews (who also claim that it contains traditions of Moses as commentary of the Torah) and the writings of Paul & the Church, whom the Christians have given precedence over Jesus’ own words and have thereby begun to worship the Trinity and hold other false beliefs. With this in mind, shouldn’t we be wary that we TOO might also have gone astray from the pure teachings of God in the Quran? Wouldn’t it be foolish and careless of us to ignore the warnings of Allah (SWT) about the history of people of the scripture, and thus fail to consider that we might be deviating from the right path just as they did? *11)* Finally, what WOULD the Quran actually have to say for you to accept that it is the only revelation brought down from God to the Prophet? The Quran already says COUNTLESS times that it is clear & lucid, sufficient for guidance, detailed & self-explanatory, unmatched & supreme, and perfectly preserved-so what else could the Quran then possibly say for you to finally give up and realize that it is what it claims to be? I hope you will think about these questions sincerely. Salam.
These Sufi saints-Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti, Sheikh Nizamuddin Auliya, Hazrat Shah Jalal, Baba Fariduddin Ganjshakar, Makhdum Shah Daulah Shahid, Hazrat Ali Hujwiri (Data Ganj Baksh), Shah Waliullah Dehlawi, Pir Hazrat Shah Bahauddin Naqshband, Hazrat Khwaja Baqi Billah, Khwaja Garibullah, Sheikh Alauddin Sabir Kaliyari, and Hazrat Shah Niyaz Ahmad Barelvi-are enough proof to say that Quranists are deluded in their rejection of hadith. These towering figures of Islam, who spread the faith across the Indian subcontinent, never abandoned a single hadith and upheld both the Qur'an and the Sunnah in their teachings and practice. Their lives reflect the integral role of hadith in Islamic spirituality and guidance.
Imam al-Barbahari (rahimahullah) stated: “Know that Allah’s Messenger (Peace be upon him) said: “My ummah will divide into 73 sects, all of them will be in the Fire except for one, and that is the Jamā’ah.” It was said, “And who are they, O Allah’s Messenger?” He (Peace be upon him) responded, “That which I and my Companions are upon today. (Tirmidhi, no. 2641)
I go to the Book of Allah "The Qur'an" in order to understand what my lord wants me to do.🙏 ALLAH swt said in Surat Ibrahim verse 52. (This ˹Quran˺ is a ˹sufficient˺ message for humanity so that they may take it as a warning and know that there is only One God, and so that people of reason may be mindful.) ❤
@@HamzaMalik-ez4ro my man… it’s crazy. A Persian from Bukhara must explain the Quran when it was revealed 200 years before them 🤣 mushrik logic. So all wise God can’t explain it to humanity 🤣. Quran tells us “do not discriminate between the messengers” 2:136 and they always talk about Gods final prophet Muhammad… it’s crazy how they reason. I truly believe that they hate the last Prophet Muhammad… they thinks it’s okay to have text of him when having sex with 11 women’s at one night. The Muhammad from the Koran is not the same of the Hadith. Praise be to El Eelah for your knowledge. Salam mulaikom Hamza
@@UltraXIX Thanks to ALLAH for preserving the Qur'an & making it easier to understand for all Of us, Otherwise they would mislead us from the way of ALLAH swt. Thank you my brother.
@@HamzaMalik-ez4ro thank you for your beautiful words. When the deceivers come destroy them with their own ahadith. The Quran is the best HADITH SUNAN IBN Majah 215 It was narrated that Anas bin Malik said: "The Messenger of Allah said: 'Allah has His own people among mankind.' They said: 'O Messenger of Allah, who are they?' He said: 'The people of the Qur'an, the people of Allah and those who are closest to Him.'" Conclusion ? The peoples of the Quran are the closest to the Allah 🤣 Haha keep marching in name of GOD 9:38. Victory is ours Insha’Allah 🥰
The job of the prophet was to preach Allah(SWT) revelation, through his actions and through Allah(SWT) words to best of his ability. It’s up to Allah to guide you once your heart acknowledges the truth.
He claims hadith rejection is relatively new when in truth it has been practiced from the time of prophet Muhammad. According to traditions the prophet himself disallowed recording of hadith, Caliph Umar and companions disallowed the prophet to write other than Quran on his deathbed as recorded in "sahih" hadith, Abu Bakr burned his own hadith, Caliph Umar banned transmission of hadith, collected and burned hadith etc. Imam Abu Hanifah rejected many hadith, Imam Malik rejected so-called sound hadith frequently etc. Various people in recent times challenged hadith, e.g. shah wali allah, shawkani, sayid ahmed khan, from Egypt we have muhammad abu and Sidqi and mahmoud abu riah, etc.
You have a complete misunderstanding of those narrations. Umar ibn al khattab stopped the prophet PBUH because he was severely ill and so that he may rest some time and get better and then communicate.
75:16-19 completely debunks this hadith rejection. It is a proof that the quran needs a secondary explanation that was explained to the prophet PBUH which we have in the form of hadith
@@Ahle.haq0 how do those verses prove what you claim? With references from The Quran itself, lets see what God says about The Quran: We have sent down to you clear verses... [2:99] Shall I seek other than GOD as a judge when He has sent down to you the book fully clarified? Those whom We have given the book know it is sent down from your Lord with truth; so do not be of those who have doubt. And the word of your Lord is completed with truth and justice, there is no changing His words. He is the Hearer, the Knower. [6:114-115] And this your Lord's straight path; We have clarified the revelations to a people who remember. [6:126] And We have come to them with a book which We have distinguished with knowledge; a guide and a mercy to those who have faith. [7:52] This Quran could not have been produced without GOD, but it is to authenticate what is already present, and to clarify the book in which there is no doubt from the Lord of the worlds. [10:37] A.L.R., a book whose verses were made decisive, then clarified from One who is Wise, Expert. [11:1] In their stories is a lesson for the people of intelligence. It was not a saying that was invented, but an authentication of what is already present and a clarification of all things, and a guidance and mercy to a people who have faith. [12:111] And the day We send in every nation a witness against them from themselves, and We have brought you as a witness against these. And We have sent down to you the Book as a explanation for all things, and a guide and mercy and good tidings to the Submitters. [16:89] ...And everything We have distinctly/clearly explained. [17:12] And We have cited in this Quran every example for the people. But man was always most argumentative. [18:54] Say: 'if the sea were an inkwell for the words of my Lord, then the sea would run out before the words of my Lord run out; even if we were to bring another like it for its aid'. [18:109] O you who faith, let those whom your right hand possesses and the children who have not attained puberty request permission from you at three times. Before the Dawn salat, and when you are changing your clothes at noon, and after the Dusk salat. These are three private times for you. At other times, it is not wrong for you or them to mingle with one another. GOD thus clarifies the revelations for you. And GOD is Knowledgeable, Wise. [24:58] A revelation from the Almighty, The Merciful: A scripture whose verses are made distinct/clear, a reading in Arabic for people who know. [41:2-3] And by the clear scripture. [44:2]
@@info786 why do you dodge my clear ayat that I have presented. The verses you have presented are regarding the basics of the religion and regarding disbelievers. The first example you presented is regarding the Jews and the stories of the past they hided which Allah had cleared them in the clear verses of the surah Al baqarah
@@info786 the second passage is again directed towards the disbelievers in the fundamental beliefs. Now let's talk about the verses I presented. "Do not rush your tongue trying to memorize ˹a revelation of˺ the Quran. It is certainly upon Us to ˹make you˺ memorize and recite it. Then it is surely upon Us to make it clear ˹to you˺. " Al qiyamah 16-19 If the verses of the Quran were clear then they don't need more clearance. But here in the 19th verse Allah tells the prophet to not worry he will clear the verses. So it is said that the Quran is clear in the fundamental beliefs and the stories of the past. But not about fiqh. This is proven simply from the fact that the places the Quran talks about it being clear are the places where it addresses the disbelievers and the fundamental dispute with them is not about whether to pay the zakat as per gold or silver Nisab but rather on the fundamental beliefs
*11 Simple Questions for Traditional Muslims:* *1)* Why is there not a SINGLE place in the entire Quran where a secondary scripture & divine revelation called the “Sunnah” or “Prophetic Hadith” is mentioned? Doesn’t the Quran constantly claim that it is clear & straightforward? *2)* Why do the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” appear over and over again throughout the Quran, yet never ONCE refer to what traditional Muslims use them as? (as the inspired words & teachings of the Prophet); if there is actually a second scripture ordained by God called the Hadith, isn’t this quite deceptive and misleading? *3)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of itself and it’s perfect guidance, lack of contradictions, and promise of its preservation, and so on, yet make NO such claim about the Hadith? Wouldn’t we expect that the Quran adds the phrase “ والسنة” (‘and the Sunnah’) in these verses where the Quran alone is mentioned? *4)* Why does the “Sunnah” contradict the Quran in so many ways? For example, so-called “Sahih” Hadiths tell us that tiger and other animals are forbidden to eat, whereas the Quran is manifestly clear that the ONLY four prohibited foods are carrion, blood, pig’s meat, and idol-offerings. Or for example, Sahih Hadiths tell is that the Prophet will be an intercessor on Judgement Day for those in his Ummah who committed MAJOR sins, whereas the Quran clearly states that anyone who commits major sins and fails to repent will be condemned to Hell, and will have no protector, intercessor, or savior. How can these teachings be a “commentary” on the Quran (as sunni Muslims claim) when they blatantly contradict it? *5)* Why do you say that the Sunnah (as supposedly preserved in the Hadith) is a commentary on the Quran, when you know that the Hadith is actually just a bunch of isolated sayings and doings of the Prophet and his companions, with less than 1% actually being direct commentary on the Quran? How can you claim this especially when considering the massive disagreement amongst traditional sects and scholars when it comes to Hadith-based theology, as well as numerous clear & major contradictions between the Quran and Hadith as shown above? *6)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of the Torah and Gospel, as well as the Psalms and other scriptures of God-and call these “guidance” and “beacons of light”-while no such honorable mention is ever made of the supposed SECOND REVELATION that God allegedly sent down to the Prophet, which was the inspired Sunnah? How could God fail to prioritize mentioning the Hadith-which is supposedly REQUIRED for understanding the Quran itself-yet constantly mentions the amazing wonder & authority of the previous scriptures & revelations which we aren’t even required to follow anymore? *7)* If we got rid of the Quran and just kept all the Hadith, don’t you think that the current traditional religion of Islam would still be perfectly intact? In other words, isn’t the Hadith alone sufficient for nearly everything you need to practice traditional Islam in its current form? What then is the need for the Quran under this framework? What other essential use does it provide that the Hadith cannot? And isn’t this why the Muslim scholars of the past admitted “the Quran is in more need of the Sunnah than the Sunnah is in need of the Quran”? *8)* Why is there such a massive difference between the structure of the Quran and Hadith if they are both indeed co-equal legally-binding divine revelations brought down by God? For example, the Quran is preserved word-for-word, whereas the Hadith is only preserved meaning-to-meaning; the Quran is unique in style and incredibly easy to memorize & recite, whereas the Hadith is clearly human literature and was not made for easy memorization; the Quran is recited during worship, while the Hadith is not; and the list goes on. If both were equally divine revelations of God, why is this the case? Yet isn’t this exactly what we we’d expect if people FASELY attributed another work of literature as being revelation alongside the one true revelation? (Ex. like the Talmud was done to the Torah by the Jews) *9)* If you were to give a copy of the Quran to an unbiased stranger who spoke fluent classical Arabic, and had them read the Quran for the first time, from beginning to end, and with no other source of information-would they come back to you confused and puzzled, and be asking you for the secondary scripture & co-divine revelation called the “Prophetic Sunnah & Hadith” that they were allegedly supposed to read about in the Quran? *10)* We already know that the previous generations before us who were given scripture & guidance by Allah (SWT) went far astray and added all sorts of falsehoods and fake traditions to their religion, including the Talmud of the Jews (who also claim that it contains traditions of Moses as commentary of the Torah) and the writings of Paul & the Church, whom the Christians have given precedence over Jesus’ own words and have thereby begun to worship the Trinity and hold other false beliefs. With this in mind, shouldn’t we be wary that we TOO might also have gone astray from the pure teachings of God in the Quran? Wouldn’t it be foolish and careless of us to ignore the warnings of Allah (SWT) about the history of people of the scripture, and thus fail to consider that we might be deviating from the right path just as they did? *11)* Finally, what WOULD the Quran actually have to say for you to accept that it is the only revelation brought down from God to the Prophet? The Quran already says COUNTLESS times that it is clear & lucid, sufficient for guidance, detailed & self-explanatory, unmatched & supreme, and perfectly preserved-so what else could the Quran then possibly say for you to finally give up and realize that it is what it claims to be? I hope you will think about these questions sincerely. Salam.
Hadith Acceptors have no ground. They go against the Quran. The Quran clearly says that is a detailed and clear explanation of all things and it is complete. References: 16:89,12:111 Now what is the need pf Ahadith when God clearly says this in the Quran.
Qur'an mentions revelation and explanations with Qur'an so its part of the message and Qur'an says these will be preserved by Sahabas Radiyallahu anhum. Read Quran 16: 64 and Qur'an 6 : 89 as an example!
Allah: Warns about homosexuality Quranists: no no homosexuality is fine Allah: Sacrifice animal Quranist : no no it's just metaphor for Ibrahim Allah: I created Adam from clay Quranist: no no it's just a story. Adam doesn't exist Allah: promised to preserve His religion Quranist: no no muslims follow corrupted Islam Allah: fight the disbelievers Quranist: no no it means hug them Allah: when you are in dispute refer it to Allah AND His Messenger Quranist: no no we refer it to our deity edip yuksel Allah: send salutation on the Prophet Quranist: oh heck no Allah: follow the Messenger Quranist: huh what? I couldn't hear
Imam al-Barbahari (rahimahullah) stated: “Know that Allah’s Messenger (Peace be upon him) said: “My ummah will divide into 73 sects, all of them will be in the Fire except for one, and that is the Jamā’ah.” It was said, “And who are they, O Allah’s Messenger?” He (Peace be upon him) responded, “That which I and my Companions are upon today. (Tirmidhi, no. 2641)
Who authorised this hadith was it Allah or Muhammed who and who authorised all the hadith they are 650000 books of hadith but none of them explains the quran because quran explains its self
@@shahzarkhan1966 I love hadis along with millions of Muslims. Your religion is with you and my religion is with mine. Does anyone force you to read them?
25:30 The messenger said, "My Lord, my people have deserted this Quran. Please explain how this verse is applied. How I see it, its talking about you, correct me if I'm wrong.
He doesn’t need to explain YOUR misapprehension. Hadith rejectors love this verse whereas it has nothing to do with following Hadith. Following Hadith does not in any way exclude following the Qur’an.
Surah Al Kahf, Verse 6, "Yet, perhaps, (O Prophet) you would consume yourself sorrowing upon their traces, if they will not believe in this divine discourse." Hadith has different meaning; a discourse or tradition. It can refer to Quran or other revelation such as narrations of the prophet also Hadith Qudsi. Imho. We need to study all the divine and other knowledge.
*11 Simple Questions for Traditional Muslims:* *1)* Why is there not a SINGLE place in the entire Quran where a secondary scripture & divine revelation called the “Sunnah” or “Prophetic Hadith” is mentioned? Doesn’t the Quran constantly claim that it is clear & straightforward? *2)* Why do the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” appear over and over again throughout the Quran, yet never ONCE refer to what traditional Muslims use them as? (as the inspired words & teachings of the Prophet); if there is actually a second scripture ordained by God called the Hadith, isn’t this quite deceptive and misleading? *3)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of itself and it’s perfect guidance, lack of contradictions, and promise of its preservation, and so on, yet make NO such claim about the Hadith? Wouldn’t we expect that the Quran adds the phrase “ والسنة” (‘and the Sunnah’) in these verses where the Quran alone is mentioned? *4)* Why does the “Sunnah” contradict the Quran in so many ways? For example, so-called “Sahih” Hadiths tell us that tiger and other animals are forbidden to eat, whereas the Quran is manifestly clear that the ONLY four prohibited foods are carrion, blood, pig’s meat, and idol-offerings. Or for example, Sahih Hadiths tell is that the Prophet will be an intercessor on Judgement Day for those in his Ummah who committed MAJOR sins, whereas the Quran clearly states that anyone who commits major sins and fails to repent will be condemned to Hell, and will have no protector, intercessor, or savior. How can these teachings be a “commentary” on the Quran (as sunni Muslims claim) when they blatantly contradict it? *5)* Why do you say that the Sunnah (as supposedly preserved in the Hadith) is a commentary on the Quran, when you know that the Hadith is actually just a bunch of isolated sayings and doings of the Prophet and his companions, with less than 1% actually being direct commentary on the Quran? How can you claim this especially when considering the massive disagreement amongst traditional sects and scholars when it comes to Hadith-based theology, as well as numerous clear & major contradictions between the Quran and Hadith as shown above? *6)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of the Torah and Gospel, as well as the Psalms and other scriptures of God-and call these “guidance” and “beacons of light”-while no such honorable mention is ever made of the supposed SECOND REVELATION that God allegedly sent down to the Prophet, which was the inspired Sunnah? How could God fail to prioritize mentioning the Hadith-which is supposedly REQUIRED for understanding the Quran itself-yet constantly mentions the amazing wonder & authority of the previous scriptures & revelations which we aren’t even required to follow anymore? *7)* If we got rid of the Quran and just kept all the Hadith, don’t you think that the current traditional religion of Islam would still be perfectly intact? In other words, isn’t the Hadith alone sufficient for nearly everything you need to practice traditional Islam in its current form? What then is the need for the Quran under this framework? What other essential use does it provide that the Hadith cannot? And isn’t this why the Muslim scholars of the past admitted “the Quran is in more need of the Sunnah than the Sunnah is in need of the Quran”? *8)* Why is there such a massive difference between the structure of the Quran and Hadith if they are both indeed co-equal legally-binding divine revelations brought down by God? For example, the Quran is preserved word-for-word, whereas the Hadith is only preserved meaning-to-meaning; the Quran is unique in style and incredibly easy to memorize & recite, whereas the Hadith is clearly human literature and was not made for easy memorization; the Quran is recited during worship, while the Hadith is not; and the list goes on. If both were equally divine revelations of God, why is this the case? Yet isn’t this exactly what we we’d expect if people FASELY attributed another work of literature as being revelation alongside the one true revelation? (Ex. like the Talmud was done to the Torah by the Jews) *9)* If you were to give a copy of the Quran to an unbiased stranger who spoke fluent classical Arabic, and had them read the Quran for the first time, from beginning to end, and with no other source of information-would they come back to you confused and puzzled, and be asking you for the secondary scripture & co-divine revelation called the “Prophetic Sunnah & Hadith” that they were allegedly supposed to read about in the Quran? *10)* We already know that the previous generations before us who were given scripture & guidance by Allah (SWT) went far astray and added all sorts of falsehoods and fake traditions to their religion, including the Talmud of the Jews (who also claim that it contains traditions of Moses as commentary of the Torah) and the writings of Paul & the Church, whom the Christians have given precedence over Jesus’ own words and have thereby begun to worship the Trinity and hold other false beliefs. With this in mind, shouldn’t we be wary that we TOO might also have gone astray from the pure teachings of God in the Quran? Wouldn’t it be foolish and careless of us to ignore the warnings of Allah (SWT) about the history of people of the scripture, and thus fail to consider that we might be deviating from the right path just as they did? *11)* Finally, what WOULD the Quran actually have to say for you to accept that it is the only revelation brought down from God to the Prophet? The Quran already says COUNTLESS times that it is clear & lucid, sufficient for guidance, detailed & self-explanatory, unmatched & supreme, and perfectly preserved-so what else could the Quran then possibly say for you to finally give up and realize that it is what it claims to be? I hope you will think about these questions sincerely. Salam.
It's not that simple: -Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, 'There is *NONE* born among the OFF-SPRING of ADAM, but *SATAN* TOUCHES it .. ***EXCEPT*** MARY and her CHILD" (JESUS) -Bukhari 3431 (or 641), Grade: *Sahih (Authentic)* -This was *required* to solve the problem below. The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: "Adam denied, so his offspring denied, and Adam forgot and his offspring forgot, and *ADAM SINNED,* so *HIS OFFSPRING SINNED."* -Jami` at-Tirmidhi 3076 (Vol. 5, Bk 46, #3076) *This locked mankind out of Paradise:* Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying: There was argument.. *MOSES* said to *ADAM:* You are our father. *YOU* did us HARM and *CAUSED US* to get *OUT OF PARADISE.* ADAM said to him: You are Moses. Allah selected you (for *DIRECT CONVERSATION* with you) and wrote with *His own Hand* the Book (Torah) for you. DESPITE this you BLAME ME.. Allah's Apostle (ﷺ) said:. This is how Adam came the better of Moses.. [NOTE: Moses could *NOT* get people back into Paradise. Only a *New Adam* - the Messiah could get people back into Paradise] -Grade: *Sahih (Authentic)* -Muslim 2652a The Prophet (ﷺ) said, " *Adam* and *Moses* debated.. *Moses said,* 'You are *Adam* who turned out *YOUR OFFSPRING* from PARADISE.' *Adam said,* ‘You are Moses whom Allah chose for His Message and for His direct talk, yet you *BLAME ME* for A MATTER which had been *ORDAINED FOR ME* even BEFORE my creation?' Thus *ADAM OVERCAME MOSES."* -[NOTE: Moses could *NOT* get people back into Paradise. Only a *New Adam* - the Massih could get people back into Paradise] -Grade: *Sahih (Authentic)* -Bukhari 7515 or (9,93,606) *Souls being prone to Sin are not allowed in heaven.* But Jesus is *SINLESS* and Will Always Be (3:46; 6:8; 19:19). This is why Allah raised up Jesus to himself (4:158). This is WHY Jesus is ALIVE in heaven right now (4:157-158). This also explains why doing *GOOD DEEDS* alone can *NOT* get someone into Paradise: The Prophet (ﷺ) said: "..one's GOOD DEEDS will *NOT* make him enter Paradise." They asked, *EVEN YOU,* O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)?" He said, *"EVEN I,* unless and until Allah bestows His *PARDON* and *MERCY* on me." -Bukhari 6466 or (8,76,473) One thing that *IS REQUIRED,* is before you die, you MUST BELIEVE in Jesus *SPECIFICALLY* - this is *REQUIRED* to goto heaven, because he will COME AGAIN on the Last Day (4:159; 43:61): Surat 4:159 there is **NONE** from the People of the Book **BUT** he that will ***SURELY BELIEVE IN JESUS*** before his death. And on the DAY OF JUDGEMENT he [Iesa] wiill be a **WITNESS AGAINST THEM** -(ie: Iesa will say he does not know you. Remember *unlike other Prophets,* Iesa is the Massih and ALIVE in heaven right NOW.) Since a baby he was a sign to all worlds - He is the Word of Allah, the Spirit of Allah, and forever Sinless not needing repentance like other Prophets - this is why Allah took Iesa up *to Himself,* and this is why WE can now be resurrected and enter Paradise eternally).
@@AlphaOmega888 My friend, Christianity is mislead. Jesus is not God-we can literally see a development in his image as we go from the earliest Gospel (Mark) to the latest one (John), as the stories about him change and his entire character is radically re-represented. Just compare the gospels yourself by reading them vertically with one another. See Dr. Bart Ehrman’s lectures on RUclips for more info; it’s some serious red-pill stuff, and it confirms the Quran’s depiction despite coming “600 years later”-which is one of Jesus having claimed to be no more than the Jewish Messiah and God’s prophet-exactly what the scholarly consensus is now. Also, the whole issue of salvation is wrong in Christianity; it deviates from the Old Testament in which God simply asks for a repentant heart. How do you think God forgave the entire city of Nineveh? Or when He forgave David of his alleged murder and lust, when David explicitly cried out to God saying that he has no sacrificial offering but only a repentant heart? God freely forgave him for that. Such is God’s mercy & forgiveness-the same forgiveness of God that Christ preached about when He told people to turn back to God before the coming of the Kingdom, and to serve Him alone-his Lord and theirs. This has been the consistent message of God’s prophets throughout history, but Roman pagan-influenced Christians and misguided individuals such as Paul deviated from this pristine message of Christ and the prophets before him; they claimed that faith alone is required for salvation and that the law is done away with, whereas Christ himself is reported to have consistently said that works are also necessary (Mark 10:18-onwards) and that the Law shall not be abrogated (Matthew 5:17-20). Moreover, for God to murder someone innocent (Christ) is neither mercy nor justice. It is not mercy because God still demands blood punishment when He can simply forgive (since He’s the one who MADE THE RULES in the first place), and it isn’t justice either because punishing an innocent person on behalf of the guilty-even if they voluntarily do it-is an insult to true justice, which demands that only the guilty bear their own load (as Ezekiel 18 itself clearly teaches). There are other serious problems as well: if some sins require eternity in Hellfire as punishment, then shouldn’t have Christ remained in Hellfire for eternity to pay, rather than just 3 days? Also, if only the human nature of Jesus (who is by definition the “god-man”) died on the cross, then what was the point of incarnating in the first place? But if the divine nature of Jesus also died, then God died-that is literally a self-contradictory irrational statement, and one which fiercely opposes Biblical scripture. Yet if only one nature of Christ died, and not both, then Jesus didn’t actually die, since his one person is inseparable from the two natures. It all makes no sense. But we can rest assured that Jesus never actually taught any of this-he simply reiterated the same message as the prophets before him: to serve God alone-his Lord and their Lord-and to treat your neighbor as yourself; these two are the GREATEST commandments according to Jesus (Mark 12:29-33). Serve the Creator, and do good to the creation. The most simply & profound religious message. Besides, if believing in the atonement of Jesus was the only thing required for salvation, then what’s the purpose of life? God just put us on this earth after CREATING sin, only to then send his alleged son/Himself to die for us 2,000 years ago and leave us back at square one where we have no real purpose but to rejoice in His solution to the problem that He Himself created? It doesn’t make any sense my friend, and you know it. The fact that we have a limited time on this earth, and have senses & limbs, and free will to do good vs. evil, manifestly shows that the purpose of this life is a TEST-just as the Quran teaches; that God has created death and life in order to test us as to which of us behaves more excellently & with virtue. So no, if a person murders and rapes his whole life but believes that Christ atoned for him, it is by no means justice that this person gets eternal life, as Christian theology suggests. Rather, that person will be judged by God and will suffer immensely in the afterlife should they fail to repent to God and turn from their ways. True justice. You know that all of this is clearly confusing and doesn’t resonate with your mind and heart. So come back to the original message of Christ and all the prophets before him, which is to have faith AND work righteous deeds, all for the sake of God alone, that by His GRACE and MERCY you should get to know Him and be granted everlasting life with Him in the end. That is God’s promise; and God never breaks His promises. So as a person of the scripture, do not go to extremes in your theology beyond the truth, and do not follow the whims & opinions of people who went far astray in the past, and who mislead many, and who themselves strayed far off the straight path. And indeed, God Almighty-YHWH your Lord, the Creator of heaven and earth-speaks directly to you, so take heed to what your Lord says: *_”O people of the Scripture! Do not go too far in your theology, and do not say anything about God but the truth! The Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary, is only God’s messenger, as well as His Word which He cast into Mary, and a spirit from Him! So believe in God and His messengers, and do not speak of a trinity! Stop it-it is for your own good! God is one sole divinity, who is far above having a son! He owns everything in the heavens and everything on earth; and God is able to manage it all on His own!”_* And He also solemnly declares to you all: *_”O you who received the Scripture & Covenant! Believe in what We have sent down, verifying & fulfilling what is with you, before We wipe out faces and turn them backward, or curse them like We cursed the violators of the Sabbath! And God’s will is always done!”_* ------------------------ *_”O people of the Scripture! Our messenger has come to you, clarifying for you much of what you kept hidden of the Scripture, and overlooking much! A light from God has come to you, and a clear Book!”_* *_”God guides with it whoever follows His approval to the ways of peace, and He brings them out of darkness into light, by His permission, and He guides them in a straight path!”_* *_”O People of the Scripture! Our messenger has come to you, making things clear to you-after a cessation of messengers-so that none of you can say, “No preacher had come to us, nor any warner!” And so a preacher has now come to you, and a warner! And God is Capable of all things!”_* ------------------------ Full free translation of the Noble Recitation (Quran): clearquran.com
@@AlphaOmega888 crucifiction attempt on Jesus to remove laws will make his ppl lose blessings in mathew 21 :43 & jeremia 31 :36. pauls in acts 9 : 3 saw devil of luke 10 :18 went to Arabia, is lawless false prophet in mathew 24 :11 thought he's who will correct him - comforter in John 1 :21 & 16 :8, Prophet law giver like Musa is Muhammad peace and blessings on him! Jesus is only sent to his tribe, after mark 16 : 8 Jesus's 2nd appearance saying he's sent for the world is an admitted fabrication. isaiah 49 says Jesus will leave his tribe and return following the light of nations of isaiah 42, a new covenent, from the Arab Prophet from mt selah Medina, this is clearly Islam. Abraham wasn't from juda, juda came like 2 centuries later, Ibrahim and Ismael were Muslims who built the Kaba, even Jacob imitates the hajj in genesis 28!
@@AlphaOmega888 It begins and ends with Islam just like Ismael is older then Isaaq and the bible lies and says he wasn't in the covenent in Genesis 17 : 20, it says Ismael is blessed & I bless Issak but you bible changed the AND into a "BUT". very dishonest. and similarly Jesus will follow Muhammad peace and blessings n him!
Q2:173 He has ONLY forbidden to you dead animals, blood, the flesh of swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah . But whoever is forced [by necessity], neither desiring [it] nor transgressing [its limit], there is no sin upon him. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. Here Allah stresses that there are ONLY four dietary prohibitions Q16:115-116 He has ONLY forbidden to you dead animals, blood, the esh of swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah. But whoever is forced [by necessity], neither desiring [it] nor transgressing [its limit] - then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. And do not say about what your tongues assert of untruth, " This is lawful and this is unlawful" to invent falsehood about Allah . Indeed, those who invent falsehood about Allah will not succeed. Allah repeats that there are only four prohibitions and those who say (all the hadith collectors and followers) there are other extra prohibitions are inventing falsehood about Allah Q6:145-149 Say, I DO NOT FIND in what has been revealed to me anything forbidden to eat except carrion, running blood, swine which is impure or a sinful offering in the name of any other than Allah. But if someone is compelled by necessity neither driven by desire nor exceeding immediat need then surely your Lord is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful." Interestingly, here Allah commands everyone to declare that they have understood there there are only four dietary prohibitions. Q6:150 Say, Bring forward your witnesses who will testify that Allah has prohibited this." And if they testify, DO NOT TESTIFY with them. And do not follow the desires of those who deny Our verses and those who do not believe in the Hereafter, while they equate [others] with their Lord. Finally Allah commands us to reject any other prohibitions no matter how convincing testimony (Bukhari, Muslim, Musnad etc. ) is presented. No reasoning, convincing, discussions !! Simple rejection ! This is a big slap on the face of all the hadith idolators who use manmade fabrications to twinst the simple to understand word of Allah. Most of these people run away from answering this question.
Hadith rejecters is in fact the Quran rejectors and their end destination is rejection of Islam altogether and I have seen this with my own eyes Surah An-Nisa, Verse 65: فَلَا وَرَبِّكَ لَا يُؤْمِنُونَ حَتَّىٰ يُحَكِّمُوكَ فِيمَا شَجَرَ بَيْنَهُمْ ثُمَّ لَا يَجِدُوا فِي أَنفُسِهِمْ حَرَجًا مِّمَّا قَضَيْتَ وَيُسَلِّمُوا تَسْلِيمًا But nay, by thy Lord, they will not believe (in truth) until they make thee judge of what is in dispute between them and find within themselves no dislike of that which thou decidest, and submit with full submission. (English - Pickthal)
@@NaveedBashirJanjua Answer the question that I asked above. Do not dodge. Based on the above verses: (1) Do you believe that there are ONLY 4 dietry prohibitions accordint to Allah ? (2) Do you believe that anybody (hadith collectors of both shiit and sunni sects, ulema, scholar, hadith followers) who comes with any extra prohibition is inventing falsehood ? (3) Do you unconditionally reject the testimony of those people who give you prohibitions other than the ones explicitly mentioned in the Quran ? If your answer to any of the three questions above is no, then you simply reject the very clear and unambiguos statements of Allah.
@@adilrasheedonline if hadiths are fabricated then they ran as well is fabricated as its dots and diacritics, in general, were transmitted just like authentic hadiths with a chain of transmission and of the same poeple who transmitted hadiths as well untill they were written and canonized in the 9-10th century Thats why today you only read one of the readings(qiraat) of the quran rather than the other 30+ it's because of the same science and lots of same poeple who transmitted hadiths
It is a great talk on the subject Sheikh. Let me tell you what you will probably know already that Hadeeth denial started simultaneously in the Indian subcontinent and Egypt and it was during British rule in both countries. It could have been a British and Jewish conspiracy. It will be pertinent to point out that Qadianiat started about the same time.
May Allah accept your efforts and help all of those who defend the sunnah of rasullullah ﷺ. For those who is interested in this topic, u can read a book named "From a loving son to a loving father" written by Shahid Hassan. It talks about why is it absurd to reject the hadith and bring proofs from al Quran as to why one should comply with the sunnah of rasullullah ﷺ .The book is free to download.
You’re master Adnan does not speak about the sunna of Rasoul Allah but about the prophet. Navi and rasoul are not the same. Pay more intention before you react.
Great lecture ustad ji. Can you please give a lecture on which Islamic books to read? I think ustad ji you should give a lecture as how to one should start reading book or material.
Que : - What if the people who directly learn from prophet are misleaded , or they not have proper knowledge..! I am asking because companions of hazrat isa are missguided , companions of hazrat musa are missguided... In history , there is a 10 sahabas who stands with one person and another 10 shabas stands with other person... After prophet....! (Note : number 10 is signifies some sahabas , not 10 actual people) Give me aayat that says that follow shabas after prophet... And also give me the surety that shabas make alway true decision...becoz if they make wrong decision then i will be on wrong path brother so tell me...
Imam al-Barbahari (rahimahullah) stated: “Know that Allah’s Messenger (Peace be upon him) said: “My ummah will divide into 73 sects, all of them will be in the Fire except for one, and that is the Jamā’ah.” It was said, “And who are they, O Allah’s Messenger?” He (Peace be upon him) responded, “That which I and my Companions are upon today. (Tirmidhi, no. 2641)
Hadith in the Quran: 12:111 In their history, there is a lesson for those who possess intelligence. This is not fabricated Hadith; this (Quran) confirms all previous scriptures, provides the details of everything, and is a beacon and mercy for those who believe., 31:6 Among the people, there are those who uphold baseless Hadith, and thus divert others from the path of GOD without knowledge, and take it in vain. These have incurred a shameful retribution., 45:6-7 These are GOD's revelations that we recite to you truthfully. In which Hadith other than GOD and His revelations do they believe? Woe to every sinful fabricator. 77:50 In what Hadith, after this, will they believe? 66:3 When the prophet disclosed a hadith to some of his wives, then one of them spread it, and God revealed it to him, he recognized part of it and denied part. So when he informed her, she said, "Who informed you of this?" He said, "I was informed by the Knowledgeable, the Ever-aware." The Quran says it is complete and fully detailed: 6:112 We have permitted the enemies of every prophet - human and jinn devils - to inspire in each other fancy words, in order to deceive. Had your Lord willed, they would not have done it. You shall disregard them and their fabrications., 6:113 This is to let the minds of those who do not believe in the Hereafter listen to such fabrications, and accept them, and thus expose their real convictions., 6:114 "Shall I seek other than God as a judge when He has sent down to you the Book fully detailed?" Those to whom We have given the Book know it is sent down from your Lord with the truth; so do not be of those who have doubt. 6:115 The word of your Lord is complete, in truth and justice. Nothing shall abrogate His words. He is the Hearer, the Omniscient., 6:116 If you obey the majority of people on earth, they will divert you from the path of GOD. They follow only conjecture; they only guess.,
You know that revelations means anything that is sent or revealed from Allah including the traditions - like Hadith Qudsi and other hadiths. Of course, "false hadiths" are known as "fabricated" and are not believed. Hadiths means stories, as in the verse " فلعلك باخع نفسك على اثارهم ان لم يؤمنوا بهذا الحديث اسفا"
*Qur'an 6 : 89* - They are those whom We gave the Book, Al-Hukm (understanding of the religious laws), and Prophethood. But if these disbelieve therein (the Book, Al-Hukm and Prophethood), then, indeed We have entrusted it to a people (such as the Companions of Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) who are not disbelievers therein.
Allah: Warns about homosexuality Quranists: no no homosexuality is fine Allah: Sacrifice animal Quranist : no no it's just metaphor for Ibrahim Allah: I created Adam from clay Quranist: no no it's just a story. Adam doesn't exist Allah: promised to preserve His religion Quranist: no no muslims follow corrupted Islam Allah: fight the disbelievers Quranist: no no it means hug them Allah: when you are in dispute refer it to Allah AND His Messenger Quranist: no no we refer it to our deity edip yuksel Allah: send salutation on the Prophet Quranist: oh heck no Allah: follow the Messenger Quranist: huh what? I couldn't hear
مشہور منکر حجیت حدیث جاوید غامدی نے طریقے کار بدل لیا ہے، کہ سنت دین ہے حدیث نہیں، سنت حدیث سے نہیں لوگوں کے عمل سے آتی ہے جس میں عقائد شامل نہیں ہیں وہ صرف قرآن سے حاصل یوں گے، سنت بھی پرانے نبیوں کی رویت ہے جس کو آخری نبی نے صحیح کر کے لوگوں میں جاری کیا جو عملی تواتر سے ہمارے پاس پہنچیں ہیں۔ حدیث سے کوئی حکم ثابت نہیں ہوتا۔
No, just like all sunni Muslims aren’t backwards extremists or all atheists aren’t angry god-haters. Everyone is different my friend and they have their own personality, both good or bad. So I’m sorry you got treated like that. But speaking on the INTELLECTUAL side of things, I would respectfully like you to consider this: *11 Simple Questions for Traditional Muslims:* *1)* Why is there not a SINGLE place in the entire Quran where a secondary scripture & divine revelation called the “Sunnah” or “Prophetic Hadith” is mentioned? Doesn’t the Quran constantly claim that it is clear & straightforward? *2)* Why do the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” appear over and over again throughout the Quran, yet never ONCE refer to what traditional Muslims use them as? (as the inspired words & teachings of the Prophet); if there is actually a second scripture ordained by God called the Hadith, isn’t this quite deceptive and misleading? *3)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of itself and it’s perfect guidance, lack of contradictions, and promise of its preservation, and so on, yet make NO such claim about the Hadith? Wouldn’t we expect that the Quran adds the phrase “ والسنة” (‘and the Sunnah’) in these verses where the Quran alone is mentioned? *4)* Why does the “Sunnah” contradict the Quran in so many ways? For example, so-called “Sahih” Hadiths tell us that tiger and other animals are forbidden to eat, whereas the Quran is manifestly clear that the ONLY four prohibited foods are carrion, blood, pig’s meat, and idol-offerings. Or for example, Sahih Hadiths tell is that the Prophet will be an intercessor on Judgement Day for those in his Ummah who committed MAJOR sins, whereas the Quran clearly states that anyone who commits major sins and fails to repent will be condemned to Hell, and will have no protector, intercessor, or savior. How can these teachings be a “commentary” on the Quran (as sunni Muslims claim) when they blatantly contradict it? *5)* Why do you say that the Sunnah (as supposedly preserved in the Hadith) is a commentary on the Quran, when you know that the Hadith is actually just a bunch of isolated sayings and doings of the Prophet and his companions, with less than 1% actually being direct commentary on the Quran? How can you claim this especially when considering the massive disagreement amongst traditional sects and scholars when it comes to Hadith-based theology, as well as numerous clear & major contradictions between the Quran and Hadith as shown above? *6)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of the Torah and Gospel, as well as the Psalms and other scriptures of God-and call these “guidance” and “beacons of light”-while no such honorable mention is ever made of the supposed SECOND REVELATION that God allegedly sent down to the Prophet, which was the inspired Sunnah? How could God fail to prioritize mentioning the Hadith-which is supposedly REQUIRED for understanding the Quran itself-yet constantly mentions the amazing wonder & authority of the previous scriptures & revelations which we aren’t even required to follow anymore? *7)* If we got rid of the Quran and just kept all the Hadith, don’t you think that the current traditional religion of Islam would still be perfectly intact? In other words, isn’t the Hadith alone sufficient for nearly everything you need to practice traditional Islam in its current form? What then is the need for the Quran under this framework? What other essential use does it provide that the Hadith cannot? And isn’t this why the Muslim scholars of the past admitted “the Quran is in more need of the Sunnah than the Sunnah is in need of the Quran”? *8)* Why is there such a massive difference between the structure of the Quran and Hadith if they are both indeed co-equal legally-binding divine revelations brought down by God? For example, the Quran is preserved word-for-word, whereas the Hadith is only preserved meaning-to-meaning; the Quran is unique in style and incredibly easy to memorize & recite, whereas the Hadith is clearly human literature and was not made for easy memorization; the Quran is recited during worship, while the Hadith is not; and the list goes on. If both were equally divine revelations of God, why is this the case? Yet isn’t this exactly what we we’d expect if people FASELY attributed another work of literature as being revelation alongside the one true revelation? (Ex. like the Talmud was done to the Torah by the Jews) *9)* If you were to give a copy of the Quran to an unbiased stranger who spoke fluent classical Arabic, and had them read the Quran for the first time, from beginning to end, and with no other source of information-would they come back to you confused and puzzled, and be asking you for the secondary scripture & co-divine revelation called the “Prophetic Sunnah & Hadith” that they were allegedly supposed to read about in the Quran? *10)* We already know that the previous generations before us who were given scripture & guidance by Allah (SWT) went far astray and added all sorts of falsehoods and fake traditions to their religion, including the Talmud of the Jews (who also claim that it contains traditions of Moses as commentary of the Torah) and the writings of Paul & the Church, whom the Christians have given precedence over Jesus’ own words and have thereby begun to worship the Trinity and hold other false beliefs. With this in mind, shouldn’t we be wary that we TOO might also have gone astray from the pure teachings of God in the Quran? Wouldn’t it be foolish and careless of us to ignore the warnings of Allah (SWT) about the history of people of the scripture, and thus fail to consider that we might be deviating from the right path just as they did? *11)* Finally, what WOULD the Quran actually have to say for you to accept that it is the only revelation brought down from God to the Prophet? The Quran already says COUNTLESS times that it is clear & lucid, sufficient for guidance, detailed & self-explanatory, unmatched & supreme, and perfectly preserved-so what else could the Quran then possibly say for you to finally give up and realize that it is what it claims to be? I hope you will think about these questions carefully and with sincerity. Salam.
@@celestialknight2339 I am not a scholar so I am not equipped with the knowledge to answer these questions... Present them a proper scholar. And I think you watched the whole 1 and half hour video. And also part 2 is coming soon inshaAllah. One very simple reson is (from my very sinple understanding), Quran is contradiction free and also very concise, by rejecting hadith we would loose proper meaning of a lot of it and people would start to make their own explanation of Quran. Saying anything otherwise is equivalent to say something like "I understand Quran better than the very person it was revealed upon". I think no muslim should have that kind of audacity...
@@celestialknight2339 Also... لِّلَّهِ مَا فِي ٱلسَّمَٰوَٰتِ وَمَا فِي ٱلۡأَرۡضِۗ وَإِن تُبۡدُواْ مَا فِيٓ أَنفُسِكُمۡ أَوۡ تُخۡفُوهُ يُحَاسِبۡكُم بِهِ ٱللَّهُۖ فَيَغۡفِرُ لِمَن يَشَآءُ وَيُعَذِّبُ مَن يَشَآءُۗ وَٱللَّهُ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَيۡءٖ قَدِيرٌ (Dr. Mustafa Khattab) To Allah ˹alone˺ belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. Whether you reveal what is in your hearts or conceal it, Allah will call you to account for it. He forgives whoever He wills, and punishes whoever He wills. And Allah is Most Capable of everything. -Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah 284 Here you see, you would be clearly held accountable for even your thoughts, the things you conceal in your hearts. And this is very hard (if by any means possible by the grace of Allah to control thoughts). And if you only take Quran, you would be pretty danger due to this verse. And when sahaba pleaded that it is very hard to control thoughts... ءَامَنَ ٱلرَّسُولُ بِمَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَيۡهِ مِن رَّبِّهِۦ وَٱلۡمُؤۡمِنُونَۚ كُلٌّ ءَامَنَ بِٱللَّهِ وَمَلَٰٓئِكَتِهِۦ وَكُتُبِهِۦ وَرُسُلِهِۦ لَا نُفَرِّقُ بَيۡنَ أَحَدٖ مِّن رُّسُلِهِۦۚ وَقَالُواْ سَمِعۡنَا وَأَطَعۡنَاۖ غُفۡرَانَكَ رَبَّنَا وَإِلَيۡكَ ٱلۡمَصِيرُ (Dr. Mustafa Khattab) The Messenger ˹firmly˺ believes in what has been revealed to him from his Lord, and so do the believers. They ˹all˺ believe in Allah, His angels, His Books, and His messengers. ˹They proclaim,˺ “We make no distinction between any of His messengers.” And they say, “We hear and obey. ˹We seek˺ Your forgiveness, our Lord! And to you ˹alone˺ is the final return.” -Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah 285 So if your are a believer, according to the very next ayath you are not even allowed to plead. As a believer, you say "we hear and we obey". But since when we are forgiven for our thoughts? It is a well established fact of Islam that we would not be held accountable for thoughts. Or are you going to say otherwise? I don't know how are you going to resolve this issue without hadith? Even if we look at the ayath after لَا يُكَلِّفُ ٱللَّهُ نَفۡسًا إِلَّا وُسۡعَهَاۚ لَهَا مَا كَسَبَتۡ وَعَلَيۡهَا مَا ٱكۡتَسَبَتۡۗ رَبَّنَا لَا تُؤَاخِذۡنَآ إِن نَّسِينَآ أَوۡ أَخۡطَأۡنَاۚ رَبَّنَا وَلَا تَحۡمِلۡ عَلَيۡنَآ إِصۡرٗا كَمَا حَمَلۡتَهُۥ عَلَى ٱلَّذِينَ مِن قَبۡلِنَاۚ رَبَّنَا وَلَا تُحَمِّلۡنَا مَا لَا طَاقَةَ لَنَا بِهِۦۖ وَٱعۡفُ عَنَّا وَٱغۡفِرۡ لَنَا وَٱرۡحَمۡنَآۚ أَنتَ مَوۡلَىٰنَا فَٱنصُرۡنَا عَلَى ٱلۡقَوۡمِ ٱلۡكَٰفِرِينَ (Dr. Mustafa Khattab) Allah does not require of any soul more than what it can afford. All good will be for its own benefit, and all evil will be to its own loss. ˹The believers pray,˺ “Our Lord! Do not punish us if we forget or make a mistake. Our Lord! Do not place a burden on us like the one you placed on those before us. Our Lord! Do not burden us with what we cannot bear. Pardon us, forgive us, and have mercy on us. You are our ˹only˺ Guardian. So grant us victory over the disbelieving people.” -Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah 286 Here only describes Allah doesn’t hold accountable a soul more than it cannot bear. No clear indication of granting general mercy on thoughts. How are you going to reconcile this whole issue without hadith?
@@celestialknight2339 Al-Miqdam ibn Ma’di reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “I have surely been given the Quran and something like it along with it. Soon the time is come when a man will recline on his couch, saying: Only follow the Quran, make lawful what you find in it as lawful and outlaw what you find in it as unlawful.” Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 4604 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
@@celestialknight2339 Aslam al-Qibti reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Let me not find one of you reclining on his couch, when a command or prohibition of mine comes to him and he says: I do not know, we only follow what we find in the Book of Allah.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2663 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
Quran alone is enough There is Not 1 single verse in the entire Quran which tells us we need other Hadiths And many which Condemn Hadith by name and hundreds telling us it is Only the Quran to be followed
@@chailouai3084 you wrote : "You missed the multiple "obey the messenger" verses" response : does obey the messenger, i must obey you, your imams and hadith transmitters dead or alive blindly ? yes or no ? salam
@@ironman4093 nope biographical evaluation is done for a transmitter to be trustworthy btw if you dont believe those transmitters to be reliable then why believe the quran isnt fabricated? Cuz if you dont know lots of same transmitters also transmitted the readings(qiraat) of quran
@@chailouai3084 YOU WROTE : "btw if you dont believe those transmitters to be reliable then why believe the quran isnt fabricated?" RESPONSE : The quran is the best hadith and the hadiths you and your imams transmit can never ever be the best *[Chapter 39: The Groups, Az-Zumar, الزُّمَر : Verse 23]* اللَّهُ نَزَّلَ أَحْسَنَ الْحَدِيثِ كِتَابًا مُّتَشَابِهًا مَّثَانِيَ تَقْشَعِرُّ مِنْهُ جُلُودُ الَّذِينَ يَخْشَوْنَ رَبَّهُمْ ثُمَّ تَلِينُ جُلُودُهُمْ وَقُلُوبُهُمْ إِلَىٰ ذِكْرِ اللَّهِ ذَٰلِكَ هُدَى اللَّهِ يَهْدِي بِهِ مَن يَشَاءُ وَمَن يُضْلِلِ اللَّهُ فَمَا لَهُ مِنْ هَادٍ [39:23] “ALLAH HAS SENT DOWN أَحْسَنَ (THE BEST) الْحَدِيثِ HADĪTHI: a consistent Book wherein is reiteration. The skins shiver therefrom of those who fear their Lord; then their skins and their hearts relax at the remembrance of Allah. *That is the guidance of Allah by which He guides whom He wills. And one whom Allah leaves astray - for him there is no guide.”* www.islamawakened.com/quran/39/23/default.htm *[Chapter 7: The Heights, Al-A'raaf, الْأَعْرَاف : Verse 185]* أَوَلَمْ يَنظُرُوا فِي مَلَكُوتِ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ وَمَا خَلَقَ اللَّهُ مِن شَيْءٍ وَأَنْ عَسَىٰ أَن يَكُونَ قَدِ اقْتَرَبَ أَجَلُهُمْ فَبِأَيِّ حَدِيثٍ بَعْدَهُ يُؤْمِنُونَ [7:185] Have they not looked at the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and all that God has created? Perhaps their time is drawing near; so in which HADITH narrative after this one will they believe? www.islamawakened.com/quran/7/185/default.htm which hadith after this will you believe ? sahih bukhari, muslim etc ? *[Chapter 4: The Women, An-Nisaa, النِّسَآء : Verse 87]* اللَّهُ لَا إِلَٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ ۚ لَيَجْمَعَنَّكُمْ إِلَىٰ يَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ لَا رَيْبَ فِيهِ ۗ وَمَنْ أَصْدَقُ مِنَ اللَّهِ حَدِيثًا Allah! there is no god but he. Surely He shall gather you together on the Day of Resurrection, *AND WHO IS MORE TRUE IN GIVING حَدِيثًا HADITH THAN ALLAH?* (4:87) www.islamawakened.com/quran/4/87/default.htm are you, your imams and all hadith tranmitters dead or alive more true in giving hadith than Allah ? yes or no ? *[Chapter 12: Joseph, Yusuf, يُوْسُف : Verse 103-111* وَمَا أَكْثَرُ النَّاسِ وَلَوْ حَرَصْتَ بِمُؤْمِنِينَ [12:103] *AND MOST أَكْثَرُ OF THE PEOPLE, EVEN IF YOU ARE DILIGENT, WILL NOT BELIEVE.* وَمَا تَسْأَلُهُمْ عَلَيْهِ مِنْ أَجْرٍ إِنْ هُوَ إِلَّا ذِكْرٌ لِّلْعَالَمِينَ [12:104] And you do not ask of them for it any payment. It is not except a reminder to the worlds. وَكَأَيِّن مِّنْ آيَةٍ فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ يَمُرُّونَ عَلَيْهَا وَهُمْ عَنْهَا مُعْرِضُونَ [12:105] And how many a sign within the heavens and earth do they pass over while they, therefrom, are turning away. وَمَا يُؤْمِنُ أَكْثَرُهُم بِاللَّهِ إِلَّا وَهُم مُّشْرِكُونَ [12:106] *AND MOST OF THEM أَكْثَرُهُم BELIEVE NOT IN ALLAH EXCEPT WHILE THEY ASSOCIATE OTHERS WITH HIM.* أَفَأَمِنُوا أَن تَأْتِيَهُمْ غَاشِيَةٌ مِّنْ عَذَابِ اللَّهِ أَوْ تَأْتِيَهُمُ السَّاعَةُ بَغْتَةً وَهُمْ لَا يَشْعُرُونَ [12:107] THEN DO THEY FEEL SECURE THAT THERE WILL NOT COME TO THEM AN OVERWHELMING PUNISHMENT OF ALLAH عَذَابِ اللَّهِ or that the Hour will not come upon them suddenly while they do not perceive? قُلْ هَٰذِهِ سَبِيلِي أَدْعُو إِلَى اللَّهِ عَلَىٰ بَصِيرَةٍ أَنَا وَمَنِ اتَّبَعَنِي وَسُبْحَانَ اللَّهِ وَمَا أَنَا مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ [12:108] Say, "This is my way; I invite to Allah with insight, I and those who follow me. And exalted is Allah ; and I am not of those who associate others with Him." وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَا مِن قَبْلِكَ إِلَّا رِجَالًا نُّوحِي إِلَيْهِم مِّنْ أَهْلِ الْقُرَىٰ أَفَلَمْ يَسِيرُوا فِي الْأَرْضِ فَيَنظُرُوا كَيْفَ كَانَ عَاقِبَةُ الَّذِينَ مِن قَبْلِهِمْ وَلَدَارُ الْآخِرَةِ خَيْرٌ لِّلَّذِينَ اتَّقَوْا أَفَلَا تَعْقِلُونَ [12:109] And We sent not before you except men to whom We revealed from among the people of cities. SO HAVE THEY NOT TRAVELED THROUGH THE EARTH AND OBSERVED HOW WAS THE END OF THOSE BEFORE THEM? And the home of the Hereafter is best for those who fear Allah; THEN WILL YOU NOT REASON أَفَلَا تَعْقِلُونَ ? حَتَّىٰ إِذَا اسْتَيْأَسَ الرُّسُلُ وَظَنُّوا أَنَّهُمْ قَدْ كُذِبُوا جَاءَهُمْ نَصْرُنَا فَنُجِّيَ مَن نَّشَاءُ وَلَا يُرَدُّ بَأْسُنَا عَنِ الْقَوْمِ الْمُجْرِمِينَ [12:110] [They continued] until, when the messengers despaired and were certain that they had been denied, THERE CAME TO THEM OUR VICTORY, AND WHOEVER WE WILLED WAS SAVED. AND OUR PUNISHMENT CANNOT BE REPELLED FROM THE PEOPLE WHO ARE CRIMINALS. لَقَدْ كَانَ فِي قَصَصِهِمْ عِبْرَةٌ لِّأُولِي الْأَلْبَابِ مَا كَانَ حَدِيثًا يُفْتَرَىٰ وَلَٰكِن تَصْدِيقَ الَّذِي بَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ وَتَفْصِيلَ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَهُدًى وَرَحْمَةً لِّقَوْمٍ يُؤْمِنُونَ [12:111] In their stories is a lesson for those who possess intelligence. *IT IS NOT A NARRATION (HADITH حَدِيثًا) THAT HAS BEEN INVENTED يُفْتَرَىٰ,* but an authentication of what is between his hands and *A DETAILING OF ALL THINGS وَتَفْصِيلَ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ, AND A GUIDANCE AND A MERCY FOR A PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE.* www.islamawakened.com/quran/12/103/default.htm *IT IS NOT A NARRATION (HADITH حَدِيثًا) THAT HAS BEEN INVENTED يُفْتَرَىٰ,* enjoy case closed salam
@@ironman4093 nah your comment even ignoring your misinterpretation of the verses is circular reasoning fallacy en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning#:~:text=Circular%20reasoning%20(Latin%3A%20circulus%20in,the%20conclusion%20must%20be%20true.
@Adnan Rashid I have lot of respect for the work you are doing brother Adnan,But I disagree with you that javed ghamidi is a Hadith rejector,because he is Not!in fact ghamidi sahb is a great thinker and intellectual of Islam...secondly I would love to discuss with you about the authenticity of Hadith literature one day inshaAllah,possibly at SC!because I cannot believe that how anyone with the thinking mind can Defend Every Narration written in KUTB E SITTA...one day InshaAllah.....Asalam wa alaikum
*11 Simple Questions for Traditional Muslims:* *1)* Why is there not a SINGLE place in the entire Quran where a secondary scripture & divine revelation called the “Sunnah” or “Prophetic Hadith” is mentioned? Doesn’t the Quran constantly claim that it is clear & straightforward? *2)* Why do the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” appear over and over again throughout the Quran, yet never ONCE refer to what traditional Muslims use them as? (as the inspired words & teachings of the Prophet); if there is actually a second scripture ordained by God called the Hadith, isn’t this quite deceptive and misleading? *3)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of itself and it’s perfect guidance, lack of contradictions, and promise of its preservation, and so on, yet make NO such claim about the Hadith? Wouldn’t we expect that the Quran adds the phrase “ والسنة” (‘and the Sunnah’) in these verses where the Quran alone is mentioned? *4)* Why does the “Sunnah” contradict the Quran in so many ways? For example, so-called “Sahih” Hadiths tell us that tiger and other animals are forbidden to eat, whereas the Quran is manifestly clear that the ONLY four prohibited foods are carrion, blood, pig’s meat, and idol-offerings. Or for example, Sahih Hadiths tell is that the Prophet will be an intercessor on Judgement Day for those in his Ummah who committed MAJOR sins, whereas the Quran clearly states that anyone who commits major sins and fails to repent will be condemned to Hell, and will have no protector, intercessor, or savior. How can these teachings be a “commentary” on the Quran (as sunni Muslims claim) when they blatantly contradict it? *5)* Why do you say that the Sunnah (as supposedly preserved in the Hadith) is a commentary on the Quran, when you know that the Hadith is actually just a bunch of isolated sayings and doings of the Prophet and his companions, with less than 1% actually being direct commentary on the Quran? How can you claim this especially when considering the massive disagreement amongst traditional sects and scholars when it comes to Hadith-based theology, as well as numerous clear & major contradictions between the Quran and Hadith as shown above? *6)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of the Torah and Gospel, as well as the Psalms and other scriptures of God-and call these “guidance” and “beacons of light”-while no such honorable mention is ever made of the supposed SECOND REVELATION that God allegedly sent down to the Prophet, which was the inspired Sunnah? How could God fail to prioritize mentioning the Hadith-which is supposedly REQUIRED for understanding the Quran itself-yet constantly mentions the amazing wonder & authority of the previous scriptures & revelations which we aren’t even required to follow anymore? *7)* If we got rid of the Quran and just kept all the Hadith, don’t you think that the current traditional religion of Islam would still be perfectly intact? In other words, isn’t the Hadith alone sufficient for nearly everything you need to practice traditional Islam in its current form? What then is the need for the Quran under this framework? What other essential use does it provide that the Hadith cannot? And isn’t this why the Muslim scholars of the past admitted “the Quran is in more need of the Sunnah than the Sunnah is in need of the Quran”? *8)* Why is there such a massive difference between the structure of the Quran and Hadith if they are both indeed co-equal legally-binding divine revelations brought down by God? For example, the Quran is preserved word-for-word, whereas the Hadith is only preserved meaning-to-meaning; the Quran is unique in style and incredibly easy to memorize & recite, whereas the Hadith is clearly human literature and was not made for easy memorization; the Quran is recited during worship, while the Hadith is not; and the list goes on. If both were equally divine revelations of God, why is this the case? Yet isn’t this exactly what we we’d expect if people FASELY attributed another work of literature as being revelation alongside the one true revelation? (Ex. like the Talmud was done to the Torah by the Jews) *9)* If you were to give a copy of the Quran to an unbiased stranger who spoke fluent classical Arabic, and had them read the Quran for the first time, from beginning to end, and with no other source of information-would they come back to you confused and puzzled, and be asking you for the secondary scripture & co-divine revelation called the “Prophetic Sunnah & Hadith” that they were allegedly supposed to read about in the Quran? *10)* We already know that the previous generations before us who were given scripture & guidance by Allah (SWT) went far astray and added all sorts of falsehoods and fake traditions to their religion, including the Talmud of the Jews (who also claim that it contains traditions of Moses as commentary of the Torah) and the writings of Paul & the Church, whom the Christians have given precedence over Jesus’ own words and have thereby begun to worship the Trinity and hold other false beliefs. With this in mind, shouldn’t we be wary that we TOO might also have gone astray from the pure teachings of God in the Quran? Wouldn’t it be foolish and careless of us to ignore the warnings of Allah (SWT) about the history of people of the scripture, and thus fail to consider that we might be deviating from the right path just as they once did? *11)* Finally, what WOULD the Quran actually have to say for you to accept that it is the only revelation brought down from God to the Prophet? The Quran already says COUNTLESS times that it is clear & lucid, sufficient for guidance, detailed & self-explanatory, unmatched & supreme, and perfectly preserved-so what else could the Quran then possibly say for you to finally give up and realize that it is what it claims to be? I hope you will think about these questions sincerely. Salam.
its sad you write so much but don't know anythign and repeat nonsense, Qur'an does mention revelation with it. hadth rejectors are the brutal ones like shi'as. t- mud was written from bayblonian captivity, hadiths were written before but compiled later. hadith is needed to pray etc.
also you are wrong as Qur'an mentions revelation and explanations with Qur'an so its part of the message and Qur'an says these will be preserved by Sahabas Radiyallahu anhum. Read Quran 16: 64 and Qur'an 6 : 89 as an example!
Wow I actually didn't read past the first point in this wall of text and I am a complete ignorant when it comes to Islam, but to show you the weak argumentation that you have presented, firstly the phrases you demand like where is it written 'sunnah' doesn't need to be addressed. Allah is not bound by your demands. The religion is clear. Obey Allah and obey the messenger saw i.e follow Quran and Sunnah as Rasul saw is the usva e hasanah.
@@GhulamMustafa11111 You’re missing the point. It’s not that God had to use those specific words, but that what we as simple-minded human beings would EXPECT the Quran-since it frequently claims to be “clear”, “lucid”, and “straightforward”-was to thus clearly tell us about the TWO distinct divine revelations that God has sent down to the Prophet, and not CONSTANTLY glorify the reliability & authority of the Quran alone, while keeping totally silent about any so-called “prophetic Hadith/Sunnah” that we allegedly need for life guidance and understanding of the Quran itself (all of which is directly contradicted by the Quran, I should add). Yet the common prooftexts that are appealed to are far too vague (and unfalsifiable, in fact, just like the Christians have done in desperately trying to prove that Jesus is God from the Bible), and it starts to become manifestly clear to the open mind that either the Hadith is NOT a co-equal divine revelation brought down by God as traditional Muslims allege, and that people have made things up over time, just like the Jews before us did with the Talmud, or as the Christians did when they slowly paganized and distorted their theology beyond recognition-OR, that God Almighty is deceptive and misleading for commanding us to follow an entire scripture & revelation on vague, flimsy grounds (Astaghfirullah; which is impossible). So when we see the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” being used over and over again in the Quran, yet never ONCE referring to what traditional Muslims use them as (namely as their second scripture/co-equal revelation & divine law besides the Quran)-and we in fact see those very same words being curiously applied to phrases like “The Sunnah of GOD” and the Quran being the “SUFFICIENT & BEST HADITH”-then either God Almighty is dropping us incredibly blatant hints about the future corruption that is to take place via the ‘Hadith/Sunnah’, or that human beings who incorporated these same words elsewhere were attempting to TAUNT God Almighty by flipping His own words against Him and thus promoting blatant misguiding & contradictory falsehood. Either way, no one can deny that there is a clear incongruity & disconnection between the Quran and traditional Islam-and that is what I am most focusing upon. Moreover, what you say is obviously wrong-the Quran is NOT clear in teaching about the “Hadith & Sunnah” by merely telling us to “obey the messenger”, because if so then you wouldn’t have literally ever sect & faction of Islam reading different books of Hadith. Every major denomination of Islam accepts the Quran wholeheartedly, but differs primarily on their Hadith books/Hadith methodologies, which only then in turn affects how they interpret the Quran. So please, don’t downplay these issues and ignore massive Hadith-based division and confusion that we find between virtually every sect and their interpretation of what it means to “obey the messenger” (even though they actually follow Hadith because of history & tradition, rather than reading Quran verses like this). Additionally, the phrase “obey the MESSENGER” simply means obey the one who delivers the MESSAGE (risālah), and that message is unequivocally the Quran. And it wouldn’t have been enough to just say “obey God” since that is too vague and brings no attention to the specific revelation being spread & preached by the messenger (ex. someone can say “Alright then I will follow whatever I think God has revealed to me inside”), while on the other hand it is also not sufficient to simply say “obey the messenger” since that completely neglects God from the picture, which is the very foundation & pinnacle of following the message itself. So notice how the Quran didn’t say “obey Muhammad” or even “obey the prophet” but rather links it directly back to the MESSAGE itself (the Quran) by saying “obey the MESSENGER” (the message-bearer/deliverer; rasūl). Also think about it-Quran 4:80 tells us that whoever obeys the messenger has already obeyed God. We are also told that the Sunnah itself IS a divine revelation of God. Therefore, putting these together, the phrase “obey God” in the Quran can also be argued to mean “obey the Quran AND the Sunnah” and thus the next phrase “and obey the messenger” is left hanging, and one wonders what it could mean?...So you see? Even your own interpretation has various problems with it, not least of which is the fact that the Hadith/Sunnah is simply _NOT. ONCE. EXPLICITLY. SPOKEN. OF. IN. THE. ENTIRETY. OF THE QURAN._ If you were sincere, that should ring some serious alarms and get you to think. Finally, I encourage you to read the rest of my points above; they truly get at the heart of this important issue. So I hope you will take heed and contemplate sincerely, and not let your emotions and pre-convinced biases taint your judgement on the clear reality that we find in the Quran against any secondary co-equal revelation existing besides it. It’s a hard pill to swallow, but what we should be after is the Truth and not mere comfort. Salam.
@@celestialknight2339 you've actually just made my point for me. Obey the messenger is "LEFT HANGING" as you put it. Which ofcourse means your narrative doesn't fit. So it really means what it says, obey the messenger by following what ge says does etc i.e the sunnah.
for christians: If Creator made us pairs a sign He's 1 & Perfect, why He needs to become 3? Follow Jesus, David, Musa, Ibrahim etc. who taught Monotheism & law of Islam! Vs. farisi paul contradicting w/ divine sonship pretrinity, & lawless guilt! Must God degrade into 2 to forgive or 3 to guide? or be a man who bows to God? or an Angel who bows to Man? When being 1 shows perfection! Who is the comforter to last forever in John 14 :16? (Quran 33:40)! 1) Monotheistic salvation vs. "Divine" son-ship. No new God forms in a womb in Job 25 :4 or at all in isiah 43 defeats John 1! (John prologue is suspect of being an addition due to writing style) vs. Paul - "The 1st one to declare Jesus the Son of God: Acts 9:20: "And straightway he [Paul] preached Christ in synagogues, he is the Son of God." Not of Jesus but of Paul. Paul made the unforgivable - breaking the greatest command - salvation. (ultimate hypocrisy) Deuteronomy 6:4 & Mark 12:29 Jesus replied, "The most important commandment: 'Listen! LORD our God is the 1 and only LORD. Good slave/Son-ship is figurative : Dawud vs Jesus Psalms 2:7 : Lord said unto me [David]: 'Thou art my son; this day have I begotten thee." Luke 3 :22 - Holy Spirit descended upon him in bodily form like a dove. A voice came from heaven, “You are my beloved son, with you I am well pleased.”[b] *B. - Luke 3 :22 (NRSV) Other ancient texts say : You are my Son, today I have begotten you.* So Bible's footnotes shows Jesus became a figurative son at baptism as an adult like David in original text... Proving Islam's claim that bible's changed not only internally true but that Injil taught Islam first! This also shows Holy spirit is present & not the comforter. Figurative son-ship of Adam in bible, Jesus is human like him! Luke 3 :38 - son of Enos, son of Seth, son of Adam, "son of God." *Quran 3 : 59 - Verily, the likeness of 'Îsa (Jesus) before Allah is the likeness of Adam. He created him from dust, then (He) said to him: "Be!" - and he was.* 2) Law & Righteousness Deuteronomy 4 :2 - You must neither add anything to what I command you nor take away anything from it, but keep the commandments... Psalms 119 (poem on keeping law) - 4- You have laid down precepts to be fully obeyed. James 2 : 17 - faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead. Mathew 5 : 17 - Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; ... but to fulfill. John 14:15 - “If you love me, keep my commandments... vs. Paul: romans 10 :4 - For Christ is the end of the law... What did Jesus mean by I won't leave you orphaned in john 14 :18? *John 14 : 23 - “Those who love me will keep my word, my Father will love them, & we will come to them* & make our home with them... 26 - the Advocate (Paraclete/Ahmad), Holy Spirit, *whom the Father will send in my name,* will teach you all, & remind you all that I have said to you. *(Matches Quran 61 :6)* Follow laws to not be an orphan & Jesus will be with you until a Prophet comes. It's not the holy spirit - present at baptism. john 16 : 7 - ... for if I do not go away, the Advocate will not come to you; ... John 1 : 20 - ...“I am not the Messiah (Jesus).” 21 ... “Are you the prophet [(like Moses - Deuteronomy 18 :18) a.k.a. Muhammad peace & blessings on him]?” He answered, “No.” 3) Mercy vs. Original sin & forgiveness through cruci-fiction! Deuteronomy 24 :16 - `Fathers are not put to death for sons, & sons are not put to death for fathers - each for his own sin... (Repeated in Ezekiel 18 : 20 which adds: righteousness of the righteous is on him, & wickedness of the wicked is on him.) Matthew 19:14 - "Children come to me, & do not forbid them, for of such is the kingdom of heaven" vs. Hebrew 9 : 22 - ... without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness. 28 - Christ, once having been offered to bear the sins of many, ... to salvation! God is above being a man (Job 25 :4) & doesn't need a "son-sacrifice" for mercy. *Matthew 12:7: "But if ye had known what this means, I will have mercy, & not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless."* (also Mathew 9 :13) Mathew 5:7 - Blessed are the merciful, for they will receive mercy. Hosea 6 : 6 - "For I desired mercy & not sacrifice, ... Isiah 1 : 18 - “Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow;... 19. If you are willing & obedient,... (see luke 19 too) *Quran 39 : 53 -Say: "O 'Ibadi (My slaves) who have transgressed against themselves (by committing evil deeds and sins)! Despair not of the Mercy of Allah: verily, Allah forgives all sins. Truly He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. * 54. *"And turn in repentance and in obedience with true Faith (Islamic Monotheism) to your Lord and submit to Him (in Islam) before the torment comes upon you, (and) then you will not be helped. *
4) Cruci-Fiction isn't historical even in bible or prophetic. bible condemns child sacrifice : Deutoronomy 12 : 31 - You must not do the same for the Lord your God, because every abhorrent thing that *the Lord hates they have done for their gods. They would even burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods.* 2 Chronicles 7 :14 if my people who are called by my name humble themselves, pray, seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land. Jesus is predicted to be saved from cruci-fiction, Psalms 22: 1. My God, why hast Thou forsaken me? 16. (scripts differ) 21 Save me from the lion : -- & -- from horns of high places, Thou answered me! (like Mathew 26 :39 Jesus prostrates as a Muslim) Corinthians 15 : 14 - if Christ has not been raised, then our claim & your faith has been in vain. 31 : I die daily! - (Death is often exaggerated in bible) No direct witnesses but added on later showing bible changes : Mark 15 : 40 - There were also women looking on from a distance;... Luke 23 : 49 - But all his acquaintances, ... stood at a distance, Mathew 27 :55 - Many women were also there, looking on from a distance;... vs. John 19 : 17 - Jesus Carried the cross himself... (removing Simon likely crucified in his place) 25 - Meanwhile, standing near the cross of Jesus were his mother... Thesalonians 2 : 9 - The lawless one will be w/ how Satan works & use all sorts of displays of power through signs & wonders that serve the lie, (Matches paul) 10 wickedness deceives those who are perishing, as they refused to love the truth & be saved. (Matches Farisis) *11 For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so they'll believe the lie.* *Quran 4 : 157 - And because of their (boast), "We killed Messiah 'Îsa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allah," - but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but it appeared so to them, & those who differ ... follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not.* John 17 : 3 - 5 : You are the only True God, I am who you sent, and I finished my mission ( before crucifiction and after praying for Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him - the comforter. ). Glorify me like I was before with you ( all humans were with God before in ephesians 1.) Jesus here is fully agreeing with Islam, there is only One God, he is separate, crucifiction isn't his message but waiting praying for Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him. 5) Verdict : God is 1, Islam is true! Paul, the lawless false Prophet of Mathew 24 :11 & 12, wanted to remove the laws, Paul degraded God's forgiveness to create a polytheistic son (Acts 9, Hebrew 9 & Romans 10) against scripture (Isaiah 43 & Mathew 12 :7) to remove laws, inspired by the devil. A Perfect God needs no partners. Paul is corrected in salvation, sin & righteousness by the lawgiver & comforter Prophet Muhammad peace & blessings on him of john 1 :21 & 16 :8! Acts 9 :3 - he (Paul) was approaching Damascus, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him. Luke 10 :18 - Jesus said, “I watched Satan fall from heaven like a flash of lightning. Mathew 24 :11 & many false prophets will arise & lead many astray. 12 & because of the increase of lawlessness, Paul lost blessings for his tribe by removing the laws. Jeremiah 31 : 36 - If these statutes depart from before Me, An affirmation of Jehovah, Even Israelites doth cease From being a nation before Me all the days. Cruci-fiction (attempt) led to lawlessness. Mathew 21 :38 - tenants saw the son (Jesus), & said, ‘This heir; let us kill him & get his inheritance.’ & 43 Therefore I say kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people of fruits of the kingdom. (law) Kingdom given to Ismael's tribe - Genesis 17 : 20 - As to Ishmael, I have heard thee; lo, I have blessed him, made him fruitful,...; 12 (Saudi?) princes & I have made him become a great nation; even paul went to Arabia, where Ismael dwelt 1st (Genesis 21 :21 - Paran) - Galatians 1 : 17 - nor did I go to Jerusalem to those who were already apostles before me, but I went away at once to Arabia,... Where the global Prophet, who paul thought he was - would come to correct him (IRONY), - *Isaiah 42 : 6 - Jehovah, did call thee in righteousness... I give thee for a covenant of a people, And a light of nations. ... 11 The wilderness & ... villages Kedar (Ismael's son) inhabits, Sing inhabitants of Sela, From the top of mountains they cry. (Mt. Selah is Medina)* Jesus says - Mathew 15 : 24 - “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” *Jesus leaves his tribe for Islam on return:* Isiah 49 :1 - ... O peoples, from afar, Jehovah from the womb hath called me, ... *6. ... `It hath been a light thing That thou art to Me for a servant To raise up the tribes of Jacob,... I have given thee for a light of nations, - same term for Islam of Arabia in bible.* (& more) paul is the lawless false prophet, so covenant is given to the fruitful Ismael - the final Prophet lawgiver like Moses, to be forever as comforter is only Nabi Muhammad peace & blessings be upon him! Solomon songs 5 :16 - He is MUHAMMADIM - (name in Hebrew) John 16 : 8 - & when he comes, he will prove the world wrong on (original) sin, righteousness (law) & judgment (salvation): Quran 6 : 162. *Say (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم): "Verily, my Salat (prayer), my sacrifice, my living, and my dying are for Allah, the Lord of the 'Alamin (creation).* 163. *"He has no partner. And of this I have been commanded, and I am the first of the Muslims."* 164. *Say: "Shall I seek a lord other than Allah, while He is the Lord of all things? No person earns any (sin) except against himself (only), and no bearer of burdens shall bear the burden of another. Then unto your Lord is your return, so He will tell you that wherein you have been differing."* 165. And it is He Who has made you generations coming after generations, replacing each other on the earth. And He has raised you in ranks, some above others that He may try you in that which He has bestowed on you. *Surely your Lord is Swift in retribution, and certainly He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.*
4) Cruci-Fiction isn't historical even in bible or prophetic. bible condemns child sacrifice : Deutoronomy 12 : 31 - You must not do the same for the Lord your God, because every abhorrent thing that *the Lord hates they have done for their gods. They would even burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods.* 2 Chronicles 7 :14 if my people who are called by my name humble themselves, pray, seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land. Jesus is predicted to be saved from cruci-fiction, Psalms 22: 1. My God, why hast Thou forsaken me? 16. (scripts differ) 21 Save me from the lion : -- & -- from horns of high places, Thou answered me! (like Mathew 26 :39 Jesus prostrates as a Muslim) Corinthians 15 : 14 - if Christ has not been raised, then our claim & your faith has been in vain. 31 : I die daily! - (Death is often exaggerated in bible) No direct witnesses but added on later showing bible changes : Mark 15 : 40 - There were also women looking on from a distance;... Luke 23 : 49 - But all his acquaintances, ... stood at a distance, Mathew 27 :55 - Many women were also there, looking on from a distance;... vs. John 19 : 17 - Jesus Carried the cross himself... (removing Simon likely crucified in his place) 25 - Meanwhile, standing near the cross of Jesus were his mother... Thesalonians 2 : 9 - The lawless one will be w/ how Satan works & use all sorts of displays of power through signs & wonders that serve the lie, (Matches paul) 10 wickedness deceives those who are perishing, as they refused to love the truth & be saved. (Matches Farisis) *11 For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so they'll believe the lie.* *Quran 4 : 157 - And because of their (boast), "We killed Messiah 'Îsa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allah," - but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but it appeared so to them, & those who differ ... follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not.* John 17 : 3 - 5 : You are the only True God, I am who you sent, and I finished my mission ( before crucifiction and after praying for Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him - the comforter. ). Glorify me like I was before with you ( all humans were with God before in ephesians 1.) Jesus here is fully agreeing with Islam, there is only One God, he is separate, crucifiction isn't his message but waiting praying for Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him. 5) Verdict : God is 1, Islam is true! Paul, the lawless false Prophet of Mathew 24 :11 & 12, wanted to remove the laws, Paul degraded God's forgiveness to create a polytheistic son (Acts 9, Hebrew 9 & Romans 10) against scripture (Isaiah 43 & Mathew 12 :7) to remove laws, inspired by the devil. A Perfect God needs no partners. Paul is corrected in salvation, sin & righteousness by the lawgiver & comforter Prophet Muhammad peace & blessings on him of john 1 :21 & 16 :8! Acts 9 :3 - he (Paul) was approaching Damascus, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him. Luke 10 :18 - Jesus said, “I watched Satan fall from heaven like a flash of lightning. Mathew 24 :11 & many false prophets will arise & lead many astray. 12 & because of the increase of lawlessness, Paul lost blessings for his tribe by removing the laws. Jeremiah 31 : 36 - If these statutes depart from before Me, An affirmation of Jehovah, Even Israelites doth cease From being a nation before Me all the days. Cruci-fiction (attempt) led to lawlessness. Mathew 21 :38 - tenants saw the son (Jesus), & said, ‘This heir; let us kill him & get his inheritance.’ & 43 Therefore I say kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people of fruits of the kingdom. (law) Kingdom given to Ismael's tribe - Genesis 17 : 20 - As to Ishmael, I have heard thee; lo, I have blessed him, made him fruitful,...; 12 (Saudi?) princes & I have made him become a great nation; even paul went to Arabia, where Ismael dwelt 1st (Genesis 21 :21 - Paran) - Galatians 1 : 17 - nor did I go to Jerusalem to those who were already apostles before me, but I went away at once to Arabia,... Where the global Prophet, who paul thought he was - would come to correct him (IRONY), - *Isaiah 42 : 6 - Jehovah, did call thee in righteousness... I give thee for a covenant of a people, And a light of nations. ... 11 The wilderness & ... villages Kedar (Ismael's son) inhabits, Sing inhabitants of Sela, From the top of mountains they cry. (Mt. Selah is Medina)* Jesus says - Mathew 15 : 24 - “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” *Jesus leaves his tribe for Islam on return:* Isiah 49 :1 - ... O peoples, from afar, Jehovah from the womb hath called me, ... *6. ... `It hath been a light thing That thou art to Me for a servant To raise up the tribes of Jacob,... I have given thee for a light of nations, - same term for Islam of Arabia in bible.* (& more) paul is the lawless false prophet, so covenant is given to the fruitful Ismael - the final Prophet lawgiver like Moses, to be forever as comforter is only Nabi Muhammad peace & blessings be upon him! Solomon songs 5 :16 - He is MUHAMMADIM - (name in Hebrew) John 16 : 8 - & when he comes, he will prove the world wrong on (original) sin, righteousness (law) & judgment (salvation): Quran 6 : 162. *Say (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم): "Verily, my Salat (prayer), my sacrifice, my living, and my dying are for Allah, the Lord of the 'Alamin (creation).* 163. *"He has no partner. And of this I have been commanded, and I am the first of the Muslims."* 164. *Say: "Shall I seek a lord other than Allah, while He is the Lord of all things? No person earns any (sin) except against himself (only), and no bearer of burdens shall bear the burden of another. Then unto your Lord is your return, so He will tell you that wherein you have been differing."* 165. And it is He Who has made you generations coming after generations, replacing each other on the earth. And He has raised you in ranks, some above others that He may try you in that which He has bestowed on you. *Surely your Lord is Swift in retribution, and certainly He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.*
To claim that Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him is a self appointed prophet, you have to prove it. Let's take an example. In Islam, we believe that angel Gabriel, came in the cave of Hira and revealed the first revelation to prophet Muhammad pbuh. Now there are only 4 possibilities of what happened that night. 1. Prophet Muhammad pbuh is telling the truth and angel Gabriel did infact come to him. 2. He is lying and made that whole event up, none of it happened. 3. He went mad/crazy or whatever you want to call it. 4. He was tricked by the devil. Regarding No.4, Does satan want people to worship Idols or the God of Abraham and Moses pbut. He wants people to worship idols. So how does it make sense that he tricks Prophet Muhammad pbuh to call the idol worshippers of Arabia into believing in prophets and 1 god. In the Quran, the satan is cursed, he is called an enemy to man kind, the most hated. Before we start the Quran we seek refuge in God against the satan. According to Matthew 12:25-26, It couldnt be the satan. One of the 5 pillars (most compulsary part) in Islam is zakkah. Giving 2.5% of your saving each year to charity. Why would satan want that. Islam is the only religion apart from Christianity to accept JESUS pbuh as a messiah and prophet. Why would satan want that? Logically it couldn't be the satan decieving prophet Muhammad pbuh. Regarding No.2, After this event took place, prophet Muhammad pbuh was terrified of what he had seen, so he says he ran back home to his wife and asked her to cover him. For an arab in the 6th century to admit this would be one of the most humiliating things to say. If he was lying he wouldn't say he ran back to his wife. When Prophet Muhammad pbuh first gave public call to Islam. He stood on a hill in Makkah. He began shouting morning disaster. Morning Disaster. The people of Quraysh (idol worshippers) came out and asked him what happened. He asked them if I told you there was an army behind this hill ready to attack you, will you believe me. They said yes, we call you al amin (the truthful one), we have never heard you ever lie for 40 years. When the people of Quraysh would go places, they would ask Muhammad pbuh to look after their valuables because he was the most trustworthy person. Prior to him receiving prophethood. The kaaba was damaged and needed repair, 4 tribes were arguing about who should repair it, they asked him to judge because of his truthful character and said they will accept whatever judgement he gave. Not even the Quraysh accused him of lying when he claimed he was a prophet, they knew he's character better than anyone today. The quran mentions this in 6:33 "They dont call you untruthful yet they reject the verses of Allah". Plus he had no motive to lie. If we think about it. Why would someone lie? Money, fame, power. He was already married to the richest business woman in the whole of Arabia. Fame and Power he had since he was the grandson of the leader of the most powerful tribe in the whole of Arabia. He's uncle was custodian of the Kaaba, the highest honour one can have. In fact after he recieved prophethood he witnessed boycotts, he's loved ones being tortured, killed. He and his followers were persecuted. The leaders of Quraysh went to him and told him stop preaching Islam, we will give you whatever your heart desires. He said o Uncle, if you put the sun in my right and moon in my left hand, I will still not give up the call of Islam. So we established that he wasnt influenced by the devil and he wasnt lying. The Quraysh accused him of going mad until they heard the Quran. The words he recited were so powerful they knew no madman could do such a thing. One day he recited the quran and fell to sujood. Everyone witnessing did the same due to powerful verses. Immediately after they were filled with regret and embarrassment. The Quran was so powerful, Umar RA a man who hated Islam found out that Hamza RA had hit his uncle in public and warned his uncle not to hit the prophet pbuh as he too had accepted Islam. So Umar became filled with rage and left with his sword to go kill the prophet. On the way a man who had secretly accepted Islam, but was afraid of publicly admitting since people like Abu Jahl and Umar would torture the muslims. The man when he found out Umars intention, he told umar that his own sister and brother in law had converted. He rushed over to their house and began to beat them, when he saw his sister bleeding, he felt bad and said show me what you were reading before I came in. They said he had to perform abulution before he could read. When he read the Quran he broke into tears because he knew this was not the work of man, it was divine revelation. When Quraysh heard the Quran, they said this was sorcery, magic. The Quran challenged them, produce a chapter like this. None has nor will they ever be able to. This is because the Quran is a linguist, historic, scientific miracle.
@@noahwamalwa4385 Who do christians worship. The bible answers 2 Corinthians 4:4 New Living Translation 4 Satan, who is the GOD of this world, has blinded the minds of those who don’t believe The christian god himself was deceived by satan. he had to fast to save him from satan. he even felt hungry, what a weakling Matthew 4:1-11 New International Version 4 Then jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness to be TEMPTED[a](B) by the DEVIL.(C) 2 After fasting forty days and forty nights,(D) he was hungry.
Hazrat Umar (Ra) said Quran is enough for us in the life of Prophet Muhammad (saw) so what ? Is that saying he was also wrong? And didn't believe in Hadith??
@@Mimi-Maa18 Narrated Ubaidullah bin Abdullah: Ibn 'Abbas said, "When the ailment of the Holy Prophet became worse, he said, 'Bring for me paper and I will write for you a statement after which you will not go astray.' But Umar said, 'The Holy Prophet is seriously ill, and we have got Allah's Book with us and that is sufficient for us.' But the companions of the Holy Prophet differed about this and there was a hue and cry. On that the Prophet said to them, 'Go away (and leave me alone). It is not right that you should quarrel in front of me." Ibn 'Abbas came out saying, "It was most unfortunate (a great disaster) that Allah's Apostle was prevented from writing that statement for them because of their disagreement and noise. (Sahih Bukhari - Book of Knowledge)
@@callie_playzuwu5068 no your argument makes no sense. You are using a hadith to prove that we shouldn't believe in hadiths. Don't you see the contradiction?
In sahih bukhari there are hadith saying that the Prophet s.a.w. was contemplating throwing himself from the top of a mountain when he was depressed due to delay in revelation. Should we believe such hadith which go against the personality of prophet and which contradicts the Quranic verses about the sinful act of killing onself. There are many such hadith. Why dont the scholars come put openly and discard them
@@indianrational6887 dude it's not included lol he said in his book that it's not reliable, this way poeple would know rather than get confused when they hear and not get tricked into believing false info
@@chailouai3084 see below Sahih al-Bukhari 6982 Narrated `Aisha: The commencement of the Divine Inspiration to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) was in the form of good righteous (true) dreams in his sleep. He never had a dream but that it came true like bright day light. He used to go in seclusion (the cave of) Hira where he used to worship(Allah Alone) continuously for many (days) nights. He used to take with him the journey food for that (stay) and then come back to (his wife) Khadija to take his food like-wise again for another period to stay, till suddenly the Truth descended upon him while he was in the cave of Hira. The angel came to him in it and asked him to read. The Prophet (ﷺ) replied, "I do not know how to read." (The Prophet (ﷺ) added), "The angel caught me (forcefully) and pressed me so hard that I could not bear it anymore. He then released me and again asked me to read, and I replied, "I do not know how to read," whereupon he caught me again and pressed me a second time till I could not bear it anymore. He then released me and asked me again to read, but again I replied, "I do not know how to read (or, what shall I read?)." Thereupon he caught me for the third time and pressed me and then released me and said, "Read: In the Name of your Lord, Who has created (all that exists). Has created man from a clot. Read and Your Lord is Most Generous...up to..... ..that which he knew not." (96.15) Then Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) returned with the Inspiration, his neck muscles twitching with terror till he entered upon Khadija and said, "Cover me! Cover me!" They covered him till his fear was over and then he said, "O Khadija, what is wrong with me?" Then he told her everything that had happened and said, 'I fear that something may happen to me." Khadija said, 'Never! But have the glad tidings, for by Allah, Allah will never disgrace you as you keep good reactions with your Kith and kin, speak the truth, help the poor and the destitute, serve your guest generously and assist the deserving, calamityafflicted ones." Khadija then accompanied him to (her cousin) Waraqa bin Naufal bin Asad bin `Abdul `Uzza bin Qusai. Waraqa was the son of her paternal uncle, i.e., her father's brother, who during the Pre-Islamic Period became a Christian and used to write the Arabic writing and used to write of the Gospels in Arabic as much as Allah wished him to write. He was an old man and had lost his eyesight. Khadija said to him, "O my cousin! Listen to the story of your nephew." Waraqa asked, "O my nephew! What have you seen?" The Prophet (ﷺ) described whatever he had seen. Waraqa said, "This is the same Namus (i.e., Gabriel, the Angel who keeps the secrets) whom Allah had sent to Moses. I wish I were young and could live up to the time when your people would turn you out." Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) asked, "Will they turn me out?" Waraqa replied in the affirmative and said: "Never did a man come with something similar to what you have brought but was treated with hostility. If I should remain alive till the day when you will be turned out then I would support you strongly." But after a few days Waraqa died and the Divine Inspiration was also paused for a while and the Prophet (ﷺ) became so sad as we have heard that he intended several times to throw himself from the tops of high mountains and every time he went up the top of a mountain in order to throw himself down, Gabriel would appear before him and say, "O Muhammad! You are indeed Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) in truth" whereupon his heart would become quiet and he would calm down and would return home. And whenever the period of the coming of the inspiration used to become long, he would do as before, but when he used to reach the top of a mountain, Gabriel would appear before him and say to him what he had said before. (Ibn `Abbas said regarding the meaning of: 'He it is that Cleaves the daybreak (from the darkness)' (6.96) that Al-Asbah. means the light of the sun during the day and the light of the moon at night).
He didn't kill himself. And also, neither you nor I know how it feels to receive revelation. The prophet Muhammad salalahu aleyhi wa salam is the most humble of humans than others. Imagine being told he is messenger of Allah, compared to when Musa was told or Ibrahim. May the peace of allah be upon them, I love them all. They are my brothers and role models, and heros
The whole authentication process of hadith is based on the "sound chain of narrration" theory, in which the character of the narrators was evaluated. In Q9:101. (And among the arabs around you, some are hypocrites, and so are some among the people of Al-Madinah who persist in hypocrisy; YOU KNOW THEM NOT, We know them. We shall punish them twice, and thereafter they shall be brought back to a great (horrible) torment.) Allah informs us that even the prophet was not aware of the character of the people around him then what credibility the later scholars who are analyzing the character of the people long dead are left with ?
For all elaborate words you can muster, your ignorance really shows when you challenge the concept of transmission of knowledge through testimony. Without it humanity itself wouldn't be where it is, let alone Islam. Please, if you really want people to engage in idle argumentation with your points, work on making stronger ones.
@@GhulamMustafa11111 It would be insane to boast about the ignorance transmitted through testimony. Do you know that Bukhari did not consider several of the narrators of Muslim to be trustworthy and Muslim did not take any testimony from several of the narrators considered reliable by Bukhari ? Furthermore, the hadiths are full of contradictions, slandering of prophets wives, factual error, lies about the prophets etc. And interestingly not a single hadith collection exists which are considered authentic by at least two collectors. Now can you exaplain to me how hadith collectors could evaluate the character of the people (dead long before the collectors were even born) whose real character was not even known to the prophet according to the Quran 9:101 ? This question is also to people like Adnan Rashid who are spreading hadith idolatory.
@@adilrasheedonline you aren't very smart, firstly, Qur'an says to follow sahabas and hadiths, 2nd Qur'an says Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him will explain in Quran 16 :64. Sahabas said weere later told who they were or they died. thats why there are surahs like surah 63 about the hypocrites!
Allah: Warns about homosexuality Quranists: no no homosexuality is fine Allah: Sacrifice animal Quranist : no no it's just metaphor for Ibrahim Allah: I created Adam from clay Quranist: no no it's just a story. Adam doesn't exist Allah: promised to preserve His religion Quranist: no no muslims follow corrupted Islam Allah: fight the disbelievers Quranist: no no it means hug them Allah: when you are in dispute refer it to Allah AND His Messenger Quranist: no no we refer it to our deity edip yuksel Allah: send salutation on the Prophet Quranist: oh heck no Allah: follow the Messenger Quranist: huh what? I couldn't hear
Oh yes He did say He came to die for the sin of the world. It was also prophesied in the old testament. Isaiah 53, written 800 years before the fact: Isa 53:1 Who has believed our message and to whom has the arm of the LORD been revealed? Isa 53:2 He grew up before him like a tender shoot, and like a root out of dry ground. He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him. Isa 53:3 He was despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows, and familiar with suffering. Like one from whom men hide their faces he was despised, and we esteemed him not. Isa 53:4 Surely he took up our infirmities and carried our sorrows, yet we considered him stricken by God, smitten by him, and afflicted. Isa 53:5 But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. Isa 53:6 We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all. Isa 53:7 He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth. Isa 53:8 By oppression and judgment he was taken away. And who can speak of his descendants? For he was cut off from the land of the living; for the transgression of my people he was stricken. Isa 53:9 He was assigned a grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death, though he had done no violence, nor was any deceit in his mouth. Isa 53:10 Yet it was the LORD'S will to crush him and cause him to suffer, and though the LORD makes his life a guilt offering, he will see his offspring and prolong his days, and the will of the LORD will prosper in his hand. Isa 53:11 After the suffering of his soul, he will see the light of life and be satisfied; by his knowledge my righteous servant will justify many, and he will bear their iniquities. Isa 53:12 Therefore I will give him a portion among the great, and he will divide the spoils with the strong, because he poured out his life unto death, and was numbered with the transgressors. For he bore the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors. Jesus said Joh 3:16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. And Mar 10:45 For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many." That's just 2 off the top of my head. The scriptures have been accurately preserved. The dead sea scrolls and the Greek Septuagint testify to the accurate preservation of the old testament and the writings if the early church fathers and over 5000 greek and 20000 latin manuscripts testify that we have the same new testament, which was complete 500 years before Mohammed came along and trashed the whole thing and came up with a new religion that contradicts the old testament.
for christians: If Creator made us pairs a sign He's 1 & Perfect, why He needs to become 3? Follow Jesus, David, Musa, Ibrahim etc. who taught Monotheism & law of Islam! Vs. farisi paul contradicting w/ divine sonship pretrinity, & lawless guilt! Must God degrade into 2 to forgive or 3 to guide? or be a man who bows to God? or an Angel who bows to Man? When being 1 shows perfection! Who is the comforter to last forever in John 14 :16? (Quran 33:40)! 1) Monotheistic salvation vs. "Divine" son-ship. No new God forms in a womb in Job 25 :4 or at all in isiah 43 defeats John 1! (John prologue is suspect of being an addition due to writing style) vs. Paul - "The 1st one to declare Jesus the Son of God: Acts 9:20: "And straightway he [Paul] preached Christ in synagogues, he is the Son of God." Not of Jesus but of Paul. Paul made the unforgivable - breaking the greatest command - salvation. (ultimate hypocrisy) Deuteronomy 6:4 & Mark 12:29 Jesus replied, "The most important commandment: 'Listen! LORD our God is the 1 and only LORD. Good slave/Son-ship is figurative : Dawud vs Jesus Psalms 2:7 : Lord said unto me [David]: 'Thou art my son; this day have I begotten thee." Luke 3 :22 - Holy Spirit descended upon him in bodily form like a dove. A voice came from heaven, “You are my beloved son, with you I am well pleased.”[b] *B. - Luke 3 :22 (NRSV) Other ancient texts say : You are my Son, today I have begotten you.* So Bible's footnotes shows Jesus became a figurative son at baptism as an adult like David in original text... Proving Islam's claim that bible's changed not only internally true but that Injil taught Islam first! This also shows Holy spirit is present & not the comforter. Figurative son-ship of Adam in bible, Jesus is human like him! Luke 3 :38 - son of Enos, son of Seth, son of Adam, "son of God." *Quran 3 : 59 - Verily, the likeness of 'Îsa (Jesus) before Allah is the likeness of Adam. He created him from dust, then (He) said to him: "Be!" - and he was.* 2) Law & Righteousness Deuteronomy 4 :2 - You must neither add anything to what I command you nor take away anything from it, but keep the commandments... Psalms 119 (poem on keeping law) - 4- You have laid down precepts to be fully obeyed. James 2 : 17 - faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead. Mathew 5 : 17 - Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; ... but to fulfill. John 14:15 - “If you love me, keep my commandments... vs. Paul: romans 10 :4 - For Christ is the end of the law... What did Jesus mean by I won't leave you orphaned in john 14 :18? *John 14 : 23 - “Those who love me will keep my word, my Father will love them, & we will come to them* & make our home with them... 26 - the Advocate (Paraclete/Ahmad), Holy Spirit, *whom the Father will send in my name,* will teach you all, & remind you all that I have said to you. *(Matches Quran 61 :6)* Follow laws to not be an orphan & Jesus will be with you until a Prophet comes. It's not the holy spirit - present at baptism. john 16 : 7 - ... for if I do not go away, the Advocate will not come to you; ... John 1 : 20 - ...“I am not the Messiah (Jesus).” 21 ... “Are you the prophet [(like Moses - Deuteronomy 18 :18) a.k.a. Muhammad peace & blessings on him]?” He answered, “No.” 3) Mercy vs. Original sin & forgiveness through cruci-fiction! Deuteronomy 24 :16 - `Fathers are not put to death for sons, & sons are not put to death for fathers - each for his own sin... (Repeated in Ezekiel 18 : 20 which adds: righteousness of the righteous is on him, & wickedness of the wicked is on him.) Matthew 19:14 - "Children come to me, & do not forbid them, for of such is the kingdom of heaven" vs. Hebrew 9 : 22 - ... without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness. 28 - Christ, once having been offered to bear the sins of many, ... to salvation! God is above being a man (Job 25 :4) & doesn't need a "son-sacrifice" for mercy. *Matthew 12:7: "But if ye had known what this means, I will have mercy, & not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless."* (also Mathew 9 :13) Mathew 5:7 - Blessed are the merciful, for they will receive mercy. Hosea 6 : 6 - "For I desired mercy & not sacrifice, ... Isiah 1 : 18 - “Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow;... 19. If you are willing & obedient,... (see luke 19 too) *Quran 39 : 53 -Say: "O 'Ibadi (My slaves) who have transgressed against themselves (by committing evil deeds and sins)! Despair not of the Mercy of Allah: verily, Allah forgives all sins. Truly He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. * 54. *"And turn in repentance and in obedience with true Faith (Islamic Monotheism) to your Lord and submit to Him (in Islam) before the torment comes upon you, (and) then you will not be helped. *
4) Cruci-Fiction isn't historical even in bible or prophetic. bible condemns child sacrifice : Deutoronomy 12 : 31 - You must not do the same for the Lord your God, because every abhorrent thing that *the Lord hates they have done for their gods. They would even burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods.* 2 Chronicles 7 :14 if my people who are called by my name humble themselves, pray, seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land. Jesus is predicted to be saved from cruci-fiction, Psalms 22: 1. My God, why hast Thou forsaken me? 16. (scripts differ) 21 Save me from the lion : -- & -- from horns of high places, Thou answered me! (like Mathew 26 :39 Jesus prostrates as a Muslim) Corinthians 15 : 14 - if Christ has not been raised, then our claim & your faith has been in vain. 31 : I die daily! - (Death is often exaggerated in bible) No direct witnesses but added on later showing bible changes : Mark 15 : 40 - There were also women looking on from a distance;... Luke 23 : 49 - But all his acquaintances, ... stood at a distance, Mathew 27 :55 - Many women were also there, looking on from a distance;... vs. John 19 : 17 - Jesus Carried the cross himself... (removing Simon likely crucified in his place) 25 - Meanwhile, standing near the cross of Jesus were his mother... Thesalonians 2 : 9 - The lawless one will be w/ how Satan works & use all sorts of displays of power through signs & wonders that serve the lie, (Matches paul) 10 wickedness deceives those who are perishing, as they refused to love the truth & be saved. (Matches Farisis) *11 For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so they'll believe the lie.* *Quran 4 : 157 - And because of their (boast), "We killed Messiah 'Îsa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allah," - but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but it appeared so to them, & those who differ ... follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not.* John 17 : 3 - 5 : You are the only True God, I am who you sent, and I finished my mission ( before crucifiction and after praying for Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him - the comforter. ). Glorify me like I was before with you ( all humans were with God before in ephesians 1.) Jesus here is fully agreeing with Islam, there is only One God, he is separate, crucifiction isn't his message but waiting praying for Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him. ~~~ 5) Verdict : God is 1, Islam is true! Paul, the lawless false Prophet of Mathew 24 :11 & 12, wanted to remove the laws, Paul degraded God's forgiveness to create a polytheistic son (Acts 9, Hebrew 9 & Romans 10) against scripture (Isaiah 43 & Mathew 12 :7) to remove laws, inspired by the devil. A Perfect God needs no partners. Paul is corrected in salvation, sin & righteousness by the lawgiver & comforter Prophet Muhammad peace & blessings on him of john 1 :21 & 16 :8! Acts 9 :3 - he (Paul) was approaching Damascus, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him. Luke 10 :18 - Jesus said, “I watched Satan fall from heaven like a flash of lightning. Mathew 24 :11 & many false prophets will arise & lead many astray. 12 & because of the increase of lawlessness, Paul lost blessings for his tribe by removing the laws. Jeremiah 31 : 36 - If these statutes depart from before Me, An affirmation of Jehovah, Even Israelites doth cease From being a nation before Me all the days. Cruci-fiction (attempt) led to lawlessness. Mathew 21 :38 - tenants saw the son (Jesus), & said, ‘This heir; let us kill him & get his inheritance.’ & 43 Therefore I say kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people of fruits of the kingdom. (law) Kingdom given to Ismael's tribe - Genesis 17 : 20 - As to Ishmael, I have heard thee; lo, I have blessed him, made him fruitful,...; 12 (Saudi?) princes & I have made him become a great nation; even paul went to Arabia, where Ismael dwelt 1st (Genesis 21 :21 - Paran) - Galatians 1 : 17 - nor did I go to Jerusalem to those who were already apostles before me, but I went away at once to Arabia,... Where the global Prophet, who paul thought he was - would come to correct him (IRONY), - *Isaiah 42 : 6 - Jehovah, did call thee in righteousness... I give thee for a covenant of a people, And a light of nations. ... 11 The wilderness & ... villages Kedar (Ismael's son) inhabits, Sing inhabitants of Sela, From the top of mountains they cry. (Mt. Selah is Medina)* Jesus says - Mathew 15 : 24 - “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” *Jesus leaves his tribe for Islam on return:* Isiah 49 :1 - ... O peoples, from afar, Jehovah from the womb hath called me, ... *6. ... `It hath been a light thing That thou art to Me for a servant To raise up the tribes of Jacob,... I have given thee for a light of nations, - same term for Islam of Arabia in bible.* (& more) paul is the lawless false prophet, so covenant is given to the fruitful Ismael - the final Prophet lawgiver like Moses, to be forever as comforter is only Nabi Muhammad peace & blessings be upon him! Solomon songs 5 :16 - He is MUHAMMADIM - (name in Hebrew) John 16 : 8 - & when he comes, he will prove the world wrong on (original) sin, righteousness (law) & judgment (salvation): Quran 6 : 162. *Say (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم): "Verily, my Salat (prayer), my sacrifice, my living, and my dying are for Allah, the Lord of the 'Alamin (creation).* 163. *"He has no partner. And of this I have been commanded, and I am the first of the Muslims."* 164. *Say: "Shall I seek a lord other than Allah, while He is the Lord of all things? No person earns any (sin) except against himself (only), and no bearer of burdens shall bear the burden of another. Then unto your Lord is your return, so He will tell you that wherein you have been differing."* 165. And it is He Who has made you generations coming after generations, replacing each other on the earth. And He has raised you in ranks, some above others that He may try you in that which He has bestowed on you. *Surely your Lord is Swift in retribution, and certainly He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.*
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 The crucifixion happened. It was an accepted fact until 500 years later when one man claimed to receive perfect revelations in secret. Isaiah 53 predicts Jesus' suffering perfectly and why He suffered. Isaiah 9:6 calls the Son, God. Paul was a Jew, persecuting Christians. Then he experienced Christ on the road to Damascus, and flipped a 180, joining the very people he was persecuting, to his own death. Paul left a position of power and respect and safety. He got no earthy rewards for it. He lived a hard persecuted life. He points out very clear why the old testament law was fulfilled by Christ, which is exactly what Christ Himself said. I did not come to abolish the law, but to fulfill the law. The law is all about Jesus the Messiah, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. Yes, God commands against child sacrifice, but that is different to God sending his eternal son to shed his blood for the forgiveness of all sin. It goes back to the old testament. Temporary atonement for sin could be given by shedding the blood of a perfect animal without blemish. Jesus Christ was that perfect sacrifice, without blemish. Only the blood of God can atone for ALL sin. Abraham predicted this when he told Isaac, God will provide the sacrifice my son. And named the place where he was tested to sacrifice Isaac, The Lord will provide. Why the sacrificial laws? What was the point? It was pointing to the ultimate sacrifice, the Lamb of God, as John calls Christ. That's not a contradiction. God does not want people burning their children to appease him. That's evil. God is in control of our salvation, not us. Because it's not about keeping laws. Its about showing mercy to your enemies. Jesus quoted old testament, stating for I desire mercy, not sacrifice. Its not about a bunch of ritualistic rules. Its about faith in God and loving your neighbor. The law pointed to Christ, it was not what saved. It was a shadow of the true savior. That's why Jesus broke the law and pointed out David ate the consecrated bread and broke the law. David didn't let a silly ritual stop him and his companions from eating and surviving. The Jews never understood that. Like you Muslims, they pursued a works based righteousness and thus missed the point. When Jesus gives the parable of the vineyard, He is stating that he will be killed. The Jews in the parable killed the Son of the owner. That is directly about Jesus. That is why the Jews were thrown out of Israel. Because they rejected and killed their saviour. You have done a very good job of twisting scripture and trying to insert Islam into it. The Spirit of God can descend upon Jesus, and the Holy Spirit can be around at the same time. But it was not until Jesus left that the Holy Spirit stayed and dwelt inside believers full time. Because it is the spirit that unlocks the scriptures and gives believers understanding. While Jesus was on earth, He taught the scriptures and was the living fulfillment of the scriptures. After he left, the Holy Spirit returned and remained. That is not a contradiction. You Muslims try to take spiritual things too literally and don't think clearly through the issue. Its no contradiction. There is no reason the Holy Spirit cannot come and go as He pleases and then once Christ is ascended, come back and this time stay and take over Christ's role working in the hearts of believers.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 You're making a mistake. The trinity is all over the old testament. 26 Then God said, “Let US make mankind in OUR image, in OUR likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground.” 27 So God created mankind in HIS OWN image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them. Angels look like animals, with the heads of animals etc. God looks like a man. He is one who looks like a man, like a son of man. The Son of Man. That is why humans are above animals as God is above angels who look like animals. Earth copies what is in Heaven. Jesus is the one who looks like a son of the Gods who rescued Daniel and his friends from the fire. HE is the one appeared to Daniel on the River Tigris, who matches the description of Christ in Revelation. Here is different persons, all God, calling each other God with the authority of God: Exodus 3: There The ANGEL OF THE LORD appeared to him in flames of fire from within a bush. When THE LORD saw that he had gone over to look, GOD called to him from within the bush, “Moses! Moses!” “Do not come any closer,” God said. “Take off your sandals, for the place where you are standing is holy ground.” 6 Then he said, “I am the God of your father,[a] the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob.” At this, Moses hid his face, because he was afraid to look at God. The Angel of the Lord with Hagar: 7 The angel of the Lord found Hagar near a spring in the desert; it was the spring that is beside the road to Shur. 8 And he said, “Hagar, slave of Sarai, where have you come from, and where are you going?” “I’m running away from my mistress Sarai,” she answered. 9 Then the angel of the Lord told her, “Go back to your mistress and submit to her.” 10 The angel added, “I will increase your descendants so much that they will be too numerous to count.” 11 The angel of the Lord also said to her: “You are now pregnant and you will give birth to a son. You shall name him Ishmael,[a] for the Lord has heard of your misery. 12 He will be a wild donkey of a man; his hand will be against everyone and everyone’s hand against him, and he will live in hostility toward[b] all his brothers.” 13 She gave this name to the Lord who spoke to her: “You are the God who sees me,” for she said, “I have now seen[c] the One who sees me.” 14 That is why the well was called Beer Lahai Roi[d]; it is still there, between Kadesh and Bered. Hagar called the Angel of the Lord God. And the Angel of the Lord said I will increase your descendants. He has the authority of God. God appears to Samson's parents: 16 The angel of the Lord replied, “Even though you detain me, I will not eat any of your food. But if you prepare a burnt offering, offer it to the Lord.” (Manoah did not realize that it was the angel of the Lord.) 17 Then Manoah inquired of the angel of the Lord, “What is your name, so that we may honor you when your word comes true?” 18 He replied, “Why do you ask my name? It is beyond understanding.[a]” 19 Then Manoah took a young goat, together with the grain offering, and sacrificed it on a rock to the Lord. And the Lord did an amazing thing while Manoah and his wife watched: 20 As the flame blazed up from the altar toward heaven, the angel of the Lord ascended in the flame. Seeing this, Manoah and his wife fell with their faces to the ground. 21 When the angel of the Lord did not show himself again to Manoah and his wife, Manoah realized that it was the angel of the Lord. 22 “We are doomed to die!” he said to his wife. “We have seen God!” The Spirit of God is active all through the Old Testament. He is present at Creation, gives man life, gives certain Judges and prophets power, convicts people etc. It is this Holy Spirit Who Jesus said would come after He left. The Spirit of Truth. Nothing to do with Mohammed. The Angel of the Lord is God aka, Jesus. The Lord (Father) the Angel of the Lord (Jesus Christ The Son) the Spirit of the Lord (The Holy Spirit) Jesus can enter into a human body. That is perfectly within Gods power and ability. Jesus came as a humble suffering servant. But we all stand before Him in His eternal Holy glory on judgement day. If you think He is just a man or a prophet and not God, who died for the sin of the world, He will say I never knew you, Depart from me!
@@maxINaus 1) no its not accepted but made up, many christian knew Jesus wasn't crucified, the bible changed the witnesses as seen in verses of section 4. claims mean nothing without evidence. 2) God condemns child sacrifice. 3) paul saw devil in acts 9 :3 4) Pslam 22 predicts Jesus will be saved as does pslams 91! 5) "That's not a contradiction." - it is look at mathew 12 : 7 and 9 above, no sacrfice mercy. "That's why Jesus broke the law" - any evidence? no! Jesus actually taught follow the law, you guys sold out like the farisis. just like you guys sell out to lobbies today. 6) " He is stating that he will be killed." - he prayed not to be killed as a Muslim in mathew 26 :39! and psalams 22 and 91 said he won't as well! " try to take spiritual things too literally" - and you don't have any form which is why you contradict yourself and are run by lobbies and fully opposite of Jesus! 7) "After he left, the Holy Spirit " - this is another example of you just ocntradicting the bible and making up stuff, it never says that at all... it says JOhn 16 : 7 - I have to leave for the comfortor... john 1 :21 - there is a prophet after Jesus, this is Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him. there is no holy spirit! "it was the spring that is beside the road to Shur." - zam zam well at hajj!
Salam brother How about those people who refrain from mentioning some sahih Hadith or do tahreef in Hadith and don’t translate Hadith from Arabic to English correctly. Darussalam has many Tahreef. Just out of Animosity and sectarianism. For example after the names of the Family of the prophet they refuse to put Alayhissalam even though it is present in the Arabic text. Should we refrain from speaking the truth just because it gives credence to others in some aspect?
Salam, Show me a single verse in the Quran where Allah tells us follow other books/hadiths 77:50. Fabiayyi HADEETHIN baAAdahu yuminoona 77:50. In what narration, beyond this, will they believe?
@@SaidSaadouni you wrote : "Do you believe that the quran is preserved ? if you say yes then how do you explain the qiraat ? and which one is correct and why??" response : if your hadith books (collection of peoples imagination) explain the quran, can you show us the hadiths that explain these surahs ? The Surah numbers are as follows; 23,27,29,35,51,57,58,64,67,69,70,73,76,81,82,86,88,89,90,94,100,101,103,104, 105,106,107, and 109. salam
Allah has given us wisdom and intellect to distinguish between right and wrong I do not want to discuss your beliefs with you, because^ is your choose. Please please and please don't talking about what you don't know. Respect the all prophets, especially prophet Muhammad peace be upon him
crucifiction attempt on Jesus to remove laws will make his ppl lose blessings in mathew 21 :43 & jeremia 31 :36. pauls in acts 9 : 3 saw devil of luke 10 :18 went to Arabia, is lawless false prophet in mathew 24 :11 thought he's who will correct him - comforter in John 1 :21 & 16 :8, Prophet law giver like Musa is Muhammad peace and blessings on him! Jesus is only sent to his tribe, after mark 16 : 8 Jesus's 2nd appearance saying he's sent for the world is an admitted fabrication. isaiah 49 says Jesus will leave his tribe and return following the light of nations of isaiah 42, a new covenent, from the Arab Prophet from mt selah Medina, this is clearly Islam. Abraham wasn't from juda, juda came like 2 centuries later, Ibrahim and Ismael were Muslims who built the Kaba, even Jacob imitates the hajj in genesis 28!
Jesus said God prefers mercy over sacrifice in mathew 9 & 12, but paul in hebrews 9 says God can't forgive without a sacrifice. this shows 2, Paul contradicts Jesus & paul degrades God's forgiveness to intro a new god, showing why polytheism is the worst sin, it degrades God's Attributes! - *Best response to paulites, we follow Jesus as we believe God can forgive without a sacrifice, using the verse above, it's over!* this is on top of christian's contradictions of Allah's Tawhid Asma wa Siffat and historical contradictions with esp. with the law. isaiah 43 : 10 says no new God will form, so john 1 is wrong (& likely an addition due to different writing style), the word is God's attribute in correct translation. It says word became flesh but job 25 :4 shows God can't come from a womb as whats from a womb is impure while God's word called pure in psalms 116 : 140 - Your word is pure! Jesus is a created from the Word of God, He's not an attribute of God. psalms 22 and 91 predicts Jesus is saved matching Quran 4 : 137.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 every person who has good wisdom know that humans was never become allah. but, for some people confusing the difference between human being and allah. Allah is a necessary being
Hadith rejection is foolish. The prophet was sent with the Quran and explained its meaning. Without the hadith its meaning is lost. If the prophet's explanation of the Quran was not required by mankind, there was no need to reveal the Quran over 23 years. Rather the Quran could've been revealed all at once and then then prophet's job would have been completed straight away. You make the role of our prophet SAW redundant by rejecting the hadith which is a great disrespect.
and the Qur'an says that as well, like Quran 16 :64. Qur'an tells us so many worships that are explained in hadiths like salat or zakat amount and its types etc.
@@corax584 yup, even though there are details in surah 2, there are extra details in hadith, i think with sacrifice mentioned in surah 22 but details for that is in hadiths.
Allah: Warns about homosexuality Quranists: no no homosexuality is fine Allah: Sacrifice animal Quranist : no no it's just metaphor for Ibrahim Allah: I created Adam from clay Quranist: no no it's just a story. Adam doesn't exist Allah: promised to preserve His religion Quranist: no no muslims follow corrupted Islam Allah: fight the disbelievers Quranist: no no it means hug them Allah: when you are in dispute refer it to Allah AND His Messenger Quranist: no no we refer it to our deity edip yuksel Allah: send salutation on the Prophet Quranist: oh heck no Allah: follow the Messenger Quranist: huh what? I couldn't hear
@@friendlyneighbourhoodmusli6565 What you did is a strawman fallacy, Hypocrite, all you did is a slander, As you sunnis love to slander As you slander the Prophet And His followers anyone, Allah warns that you're liars/63:1 The ones who add "Muhammad" To their Shahada (just as you do) To make show of their fake faith. 1. Homosexuality is Faxsh/7:80-81 And Faxsh is totally Haram/7:33. While your Hadiths teach As if Prophet would suck On the tongue of a little boy Or make his hands be licked Or order people to lick hands Or their hands to be licked After they eat the food. And another hadith teaches That one Sahaba was holding His genital while another Sahaba Was giving a speech, so ignorant. 2. Allah clearly orders the Zabbaha And it's clarified in surah Baqarah. While you pagan sunnis question Just like Jews used to question, You say that "Quran doesn't detail, Where is the detail? Hadith details", So you would ask the Prophet himself If he was alive with us, you disrespect you're even worse than Jews in that, Jews at least obeyed, while you don't, You don't even keep the rules of Halal, You do shoot with pistols to the heads Of animals to sacrifise calling it Halal, That's totally Haram as taught in 5:3. 3. Adam existed, and he's mortal, But you ignorants say that he's alive, As if he is in the 1st heaven standing. While God teaches in 35:22 verse that We can't make hear those in the graves, While you pagans say that Muhammad Saw and talked to prophets who passed, But God taught that they've passed/3:144. And not just that, you even talk to him In which you call your "prayer" to God, That's your shirk, in your tashahhud, That's the same "quburi" act as shias Who say "Yaa Ali, Yaa Husayn" same. And they lick walls, you lick a stone, (Which is shaped like that part of Lat Which your Bukhari 2731, 2731 tells,) You have much similarities with shias, Cuz you both follow false Ahadith, lies. And you say that Satan shaped Adam, While God teaches that He shaped him, You people attribute that shirk to God, So you think that Satan created you, Perhaps you wanna worship him. 4. You are not Muslims, Your religion isn't Islam. Muslims follow true Islam of God, And submit to Him, not to mullas, You hypocrites don't follow Islam, You follow proveless lies of Satan. Allah warned that Satan throws Into the sayings of the Prophets, While He makes His verses precise, Means that only Quran is preserved, While your Ahadith are from Satan. Here is 22:52 for reference, Tho you don't undersrand it, Cuz you think you need Hadith, You basically make Hadith over Quran and over the God Himself, Cuz as if God can't speak clearly, as if He needs a man to explain. Does a king order his postman To explain what he has meant? That's nonsense. You sunnis ask what God meant, Just as Allah warns of disbelievers And just as Jews asked/2:26, 2:67-71. That's cuz some lower people Wanna manipulate the words Which the King maybe saying. That's where your Hadiths come. While Muslims obey God Himself, And Allah explains AlQuran to us In AlQuran itself/24:18, 24:58-61, upon the Prophet is only the delivery Of the Message / Quran/5:99, 14:52, so the clarification of the Prophet In verses 16:44, 16:64 is about Prophet reciting Quran to us As explained in verses 98:1-3, And cuz Quran is already clear And what he needs to do is only To recite it for it to be manifested, Quran is clarification of all things /16:89. 5. Fight you say, actually there's said "qaatiloo", which is mainly used to mean "kill" clearly Or to "get rid of" them. And killing is against those Who do mischief in the land, Not against the peaceful ones. Check 2:190-193, 8:61, so on. While you pagan sunnies Order to kill literally anyone Who doesn't agree with you, Who leaves your religion of pagan sunnism. Cuz your Hadith clearly says: "Whoever changes his religion - kill him", so can you kill anyone Who changes his religion? You do, While you lie in your books about it, But your Hadith clearly orders that, Forcing people to hide their faith, Cuz if they've no faith anymore In what you ignorants preach, They have to hide their faith, Or you may just kill those people, Doesn't matter they believer or not, If a believer leaves your paganism You kill him, if a disbeliever leaves You kill, while he may give peace While God orders to give peace To those who give peace/4:90. You disobey God. Basically Hadith: "kill non-sunnies" Sunni: no no it means hug them. This is actually a better example Than which you slandered on us. 6. I don't even trust Edip Yuksel, He denies veiling, while in 33:59, Women are clearly ordered veiling. So your slander is clearly baseless You should rather make it like this: Sunni: "we refer only to mullas Cuz no one can understand Quran And Hadith and Sharh and Tafaasir, All those are unclear but our mullas". While we refer to Allah And His Messenger By coming to Quran WHICH the Messenger Brought, not just fell on us, So we refer to him, you don't. And here how we can directly Refer to the Messenger himself In verse 41:6 Prophet taught that He is a man like us, and ordered To seek a straight path to Allah. (Not said through me or to me) So if we refer to him - He leads to Allah alone. Khalaas. Simple. 7. Where is word "send"? liar, There isn't said "send salawat", You ignorants don't even know What word "salaah" means at all, And you call your mullas "scholars"? There is said "Salloo" Which means "connect", Same word as in verse 4:102. Which you translate as "pray". So why is it "pray" there And "bless" here? Liars, Is that for you what you choose? There is just one root meaning, Can't be two, but only "broad", Not "many", know the difference. If you say "pray" It means "Allah prays to Muhammad", And orders us to "pray to Muhammad", (as you talk to him in your tashahhud, That's shirk & an ignorant qubiri action.) It obviously can't mean pray, It just makes no sense at all. If you say "bless" Then 4:102 shouldn't mean pray, So you shouldn't pray five times. You are just trapping yourselves. While if you look at verses 75:31-32, (In Arabic) you can know by logic, That he did the opposite there, So the opposite of Salah Is to "turn away" clearly, And opposite of "turn away" Is to "adhere, connect, attach". That's how Quran exposes your lies, So Salah is about "attachment" here, And Allah attached to the Prophet So He ordered us to attach to him And we attach to the Prophet Throught AlQuran, obviously. Cuz Prophet brought Quran, And through Prophet we also Attach to Quran, & thus to God. So that all can be done by Quran alone. So that is becoming the rope of Allah, Which we should all hold firmly/3:103. While if you follow lies of Ahadith, You get disattached from AlQuran, You start twisting and lying about it, & basically turning away from Quran. So if Allah calls Quran fully detailed/6:114, You will say "no, Quran isn't fully detailed" And in 12:111, when Allah calls Quran: "A detailed explanation of all things" You sunnis say "no", You're the Quran Rejectors. 8. Follow the Prophet Has a context each time After mention of AhlulKitab, Cuz if God says follow Quran alone, They may claim to have their Quran. So follow the Prophet is used there. (While there are clear verses telling Us to follow Quran alone/7:3, 6:154) And following the Prophet Leads to follow Quran alone, Cuz Prophet had no other wahi, & Prophet would follow only wahi, Which verses 10:15-17 make clear. So if Prophet followed Quran alone And we tell you to follow the Prophet You follow Bukhari & other proveless lies You can't follow the Prophet And/or whatever he did at all, It's not what's meant by follow, You can't go by his footsteps & then marry as he married Or die as he died before, Or to marry his wives Or to lie in his grave, Cuz follow doesn't mean that, It means to follow guidance. Following the Prophet a.s. Means following his path, And his path was Quran. Nothing else. Al-An'am 6:153 وَأَنَّ هَٰذَا صِرَٰطِى مُسْتَقِيمًا فَٱتَّبِعُوهُۖ وَلَا تَتَّبِعُوا۟ ٱلسُّبُلَ فَتَفَرَّقَ بِكُمْ عَن سَبِيلِهِۦۚ ذَٰلِكُمْ وَصَّىٰكُم بِهِۦ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَتَّقُونَ And, [moreover], this is My path, which is straight, so follow it; and do not follow [other] ways, for you will be separated from His way. This has He instructed you that you may become righteous.
@@AghaAbbas7 let me tell you bro but I am not here to debate.He says hadith is only a historical record nothing else,he doesnt believe in second coming of Christ or the coming of mehdi.He believes all things that are haram are only in the Quran and not in hadith so he allows tatoos,plastic surgery,gold,silk and also says circumsion is not compulsory.He believes the Prophet didn't go on the miraj but it was a dream despite multiple reports of hazrat aisha saying its wasn't just a dream.He believes jizya was only at the time of the prophet,he believes slavery was abolished by the Quran despite the fact that slaves were taken by all caliphs and hazrat Umer was matryed by a slave and many more.There are good things he has said and I have studied multiple of his works but many of his views are very danger and only based on his view and interpretation and not that of the Prophet or the sahaba or the tabieen or the taba tabian.Just search on these points if you want but am not here to start a debate.Peace
@@Titan-ub5op Bro with all due respect just search up on him and you will find out.Read my last comment and you will see what I am talking about.Dont blindly follow someone also see their counter arguments and then come to a conclusion.Peace
@@Soloman827 Ghamidi sahib does not reject hadith outright,But in his view hadith is a historical record of muslims and in them their are Sunnah of the Prophet (as) Kaul of Sahaba and Tabi'in,and he say that hadith that reaches us are not above criticism,because they are a human effort and must be put to test,even the classical scholars of the past like imam bukhari rejected thousands of do called ahadith and imam Muslim expressed his concern regarding hadith literature was around in his time,he wrote MUQADAMA in his Sahih!Scholars like Al Suyuti,ibn Hajar,ibn Salah wrote principles to accept or reject hadith... I think you misunderstood Ghamidi sahib's approach,he says,that his hujjat is Qur'an and Sunnah,he says Sunnah and Hadith are Not one or the same...but I will look further into the things you accuse him off,inshaAllah...salaam
@نحن جند السماء so many ulema against him, ah what a logic and what a argument, i don't appreciate the majority i always appreciate the arguments, u should look arguments of someone,
Adnan you shoot yourself and Islam in the foot when you claim Hadith is part of divine revelation. Quran says best Hadith is Quran itself Further more Hadith is here say No eyewitnesses or even those who got from eyewitnesses Allah says Quran is a guide Quran is clear in Arabic Quran is detailed Quran is explanation of all things No where does is suggest supplimentary information to explain it If Mohamed did hijja it would be by Quran standards yet it's not there. So accept Quran lucks completeness. If Mohamed is best example Quran doesn't give those examples. So you have to follow Allah AND messenger clear shirk
Imam al-Barbahari (rahimahullah) stated: “Know that Allah’s Messenger (Peace be upon him) said: “My ummah will divide into 73 sects, all of them will be in the Fire except for one, and that is the Jamā’ah.” It was said, “And who are they, O Allah’s Messenger?” He (Peace be upon him) responded, “That which I and my Companions are upon today. (Tirmidhi, no. 2641)
Salam brother, Read these verses first. See if these are unambiguous or not and then read the work of the mullahs. See how they expanded on the simple 4 prohibitions. Q5:3 Prohibited to you are dead animals, blood, the esh of swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah, Q2:173 He has ONLY forbidden to you dead animals, blood, the fl esh of swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah . But whoever is forced [by necessity], neither desiring [it] nor transgressing [its limit], there is no sin upon him. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. Q16:115-116 He has only forbidden to you dead animals, blood, the esh of swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah. But whoever is forced [by necessity], neither desiring [it] nor transgressing [its limit] - then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. And do not say about what your tongues assert of untruth, " This is lawful and this is unlawful" to invent falsehood about Allah . Indeed, those who invent FALSEHOOD about Allah will not succeed. Q6:145-149 Say, I DO NOT FIND in what has been revealed to me anything forbidden to eat except carrion, running blood, swine which is impure or a sinful o ering in the name of any other than Allah. But if someone is compelled by necessity neither driven by desire nor exceeding immediate need then surely your Lord is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful." Q6:150 Say, [O Muhammad], Bring forward your witnesses who will testify that Allah has prohibited this." And if they testify, DO NOT TESTIFY WITH THEM. And do not follow the desires of those who deny Our verses and those who do not believe in the Hereafter, while they equate [others] with their Lord. Q6:38 All living beings roaming the earth and winged birds soaring in the sky are communities like yourselves. WE HAVE LEFT NOTHING OUT OF THIS BOOK Then to their Lord they will be gathered all together. Brother leave the hadith and madhabs and come back to the Book of Allah. Do not make false allegations that Quran does not give details in the Quran. If you do not find any you just have not read it carefully. To start just try to find the number of rakat in each prayer in all the hadith books you consider authentic. If you are unsuccessful in establishing salah using hadith get back to me I will show you everything in the Quran.
People of hadiths are the ones following Qur'an as you no hadith people reject the Qur'an which says to follow the sunnah explanationa of the Quran like in Qur'an 16 :64!
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Let us start with salah. Can you tell me which hadith in the collection you consider authentic do you find the number of rakat in each salah ? I guess you agree that you can pray without this basic information. Unfortunately for you, you will not find this basic information in any hadith book. In fact hadith does not help you at all in establishing salah.
*1 simple question to hadith rejectors:* You know that in the very first Surah of the Qur'ān (Al-Fatihah) we say: مالك يوم الدين - Ayah Number 3 I think everyone would agree with me; but when one listens to some Mashāikh you can also hear this: ملك يوم الدين ~ Ayah Number 3 Now here's the question: Does it mean ملك or مالك? مالك = Owner ملك = King So, now I want you to make a justification for this difference in the recitation. May Allah guide you to Ahl-ul-Sunnah and right way how to pray☝🏼
@@aniiss04 Irrelevant question for me to achieve salvation. The Quran was not revealed in written form and orally it does not change much for me. But according to hadith idolators the verse of suckling and stoning was eaten by a goat and hence lost for ever. Some sahab believed that some of the surah collected by Usman was not even a part of the Quran. Furthermore I can show you blasphemy, contradictions, illogical and unscienctific stuff, slandering of prophets wives in your most authentic collections.
Hadith is the reason Islam is intact. You remove Hadith and give 20 years, you'll see hundreds of sects, each practicing their own version of Islam. Astaghfirullah.
aha and today thanks to the hadith there is only one Islam 😂😂
@@AMGbrmmbrmmhahahah exactly those mushriks cant reason.
@FawadBilgrami Is it ? When don’t you obey the ahadith…
You’re worshiping Iblees. Here this what your garbage Hadith tell you
It was narrated that Anas bin Malik said:
"The Messenger of Allah said: 'Allah has His own people among mankind.' They said: 'O Messenger of Allah, who are they?' He said: 'The people of the Qur'an, the people of Allah and those who are closest to Him.'"
You’re a dead duck 🤣🤣
Al Quran is MUBEEN and MUFASSAL !!!
The Quran the best Hadith !!!!
Got study before start talking trash. People are you are the destroying the best deen on this planet !
May Allah guide u brother
@@AMGbrmmbrmm yes...the difference bettwen salah of different mahjab is not major
The fact that centuries of scholars never even thought abandoning the Sunnah is enough for me to realise these people are deluded.
So you follow the way of your ancestors blindly.
@@Titan-ub5op No, I follow Allah and Rasulullah ﷺ blindly, and those with knowledge also follow them blindly.
@@Titan-ub5op we follow the Isnad as taught in the, Quran 9 : 100... back to Allah and His Messenger peace and blessings be upon him, why are you so blind is the right question!
@@Titan-ub5op
The companions of the Prophet Muhammad, themselves followed the sunnah of Prophet Muhammad. The students of the companions followed the sunnah, their descendants and the earlier generations followed the sunnah and the hadith. Whom are we to deny, save those fabrications.
@Mehamed kaddih What about when Allah says in surah Ta Ha ayah 9: "Wa hal ataaka hadeethu Musa?" meaning, "has the story of Moses reached you?" you people don't even know Arabic well enough to refute the authentic Ahadith we have of the Prophet (saw). Hadith can refer to any story or narration.
Ma sha Allah excellent talk from one of the best orators that we Muslims should treasure...
Enjoying this so much it's like reading a book and I'm an avid reader !! Barakallahu fik! Salam
Alhummabariklahu sheikh. May Allah bless you and your family always. Amin.
All due respect he's not a sheikh.
Student of knowledge and a very good historian Allahumma barik.
@@abuhudaifah_0 sheikh just means old man and there’s no clergy in Islam,
@@TheQuranExplainsItself He's not old enough to be called sheikh by that meaning.
How would you address a well learned individual grounded in knowledge etc. I. E Ibn Taymiyyah Rahimahullah or Ibn jawziyyah Rahimahullah??
@@abuhudaifah_0 did you know him?
@@abuhudaifah_0 unless I’m acquiring a service from him I’d call him by his name.
If he’s providing a service I’d call him by the title pertaining to that service.
Allah o Akbar... Allah (SWT) truly blesses those who strive in his true path. Mashallah Brother Adnan's efforts to study truly is so beneficial for us muslims. May we strive to study like him about our faith and history
My oustazz,my teacher keep moving Allah s with u,,, Quran and sunnah s enough for us,,,
Thank you, Br. Adnan. This video is quite timely since recently, there has been a number of Hadith Rejectors coming on, commenting on the British Muslim Channels.
Really Knowledgeable Lecture
Watching From Kashmir [IOK]
May Allah Bless you and all of us
Aameen
23 :00 - Beautiful lessons.
We live by Allah's mercy!
we built planes but not a fly which can run itself.
JazakAllahukhairan brother, very informative as usual. You’re a joy to listen to. May Allah SWT Bless you for your hikmah and good intentions. Allahumma Ameen 🌹
Dude i am proud of you , just keep going my brother .
*11 Simple Questions for Traditional Muslims:*
*1)* Why is there not a SINGLE place in the entire Quran where a secondary scripture & divine revelation called the “Sunnah” or “Prophetic Hadith” is mentioned? Doesn’t the Quran constantly claim that it is clear & straightforward?
*2)* Why do the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” appear over and over again throughout the Quran, yet never ONCE refer to what traditional Muslims use them as? (as the inspired words & teachings of the Prophet); if there is actually a second scripture ordained by God called the Hadith, isn’t this quite deceptive and misleading?
*3)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of itself and it’s perfect guidance, lack of contradictions, and promise of its preservation, and so on, yet make NO such claim about the Hadith? Wouldn’t we expect that the Quran adds the phrase “ والسنة” (‘and the Sunnah’) in these verses where the Quran alone is mentioned?
*4)* Why does the “Sunnah” contradict the Quran in so many ways? For example, so-called “Sahih” Hadiths tell us that tiger and other animals are forbidden to eat, whereas the Quran is manifestly clear that the ONLY four prohibited foods are carrion, blood, pig’s meat, and idol-offerings. Or for example, Sahih Hadiths tell is that the Prophet will be an intercessor on Judgement Day for those in his Ummah who committed MAJOR sins, whereas the Quran clearly states that anyone who commits major sins and fails to repent will be condemned to Hell, and will have no protector, intercessor, or savior. How can these teachings be a “commentary” on the Quran (as sunni Muslims claim) when they blatantly contradict it?
*5)* Why do you say that the Sunnah (as supposedly preserved in the Hadith) is a commentary on the Quran, when you know that the Hadith is actually just a bunch of isolated sayings and doings of the Prophet and his companions, with less than 1% actually being direct commentary on the Quran? How can you claim this especially when considering the massive disagreement amongst traditional sects and scholars when it comes to Hadith-based theology, as well as numerous clear & major contradictions between the Quran and Hadith as shown above?
*6)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of the Torah and Gospel, as well as the Psalms and other scriptures of God-and call these “guidance” and “beacons of light”-while no such honorable mention is ever made of the supposed SECOND REVELATION that God allegedly sent down to the Prophet, which was the inspired Sunnah? How could God fail to prioritize mentioning the Hadith-which is supposedly REQUIRED for understanding the Quran itself-yet constantly mentions the amazing wonder & authority of the previous scriptures & revelations which we aren’t even required to follow anymore?
*7)* If we got rid of the Quran and just kept all the Hadith, don’t you think that the current traditional religion of Islam would still be perfectly intact? In other words, isn’t the Hadith alone sufficient for nearly everything you need to practice traditional Islam in its current form? What then is the need for the Quran under this framework? What other essential use does it provide that the Hadith cannot? And isn’t this why the Muslim scholars of the past admitted “the Quran is in more need of the Sunnah than the Sunnah is in need of the Quran”?
*8)* Why is there such a massive difference between the structure of the Quran and Hadith if they are both indeed co-equal legally-binding divine revelations brought down by God? For example, the Quran is preserved word-for-word, whereas the Hadith is only preserved meaning-to-meaning; the Quran is unique in style and incredibly easy to memorize & recite, whereas the Hadith is clearly human literature and was not made for easy memorization; the Quran is recited during worship, while the Hadith is not; and the list goes on. If both were equally divine revelations of God, why is this the case? Yet isn’t this exactly what we we’d expect if people FASELY attributed another work of literature as being revelation alongside the one true revelation? (Ex. like the Talmud was done to the Torah by the Jews)
*9)* If you were to give a copy of the Quran to an unbiased stranger who spoke fluent classical Arabic, and had them read the Quran for the first time, from beginning to end, and with no other source of information-would they come back to you confused and puzzled, and be asking you for the secondary scripture & co-divine revelation called the “Prophetic Sunnah & Hadith” that they were allegedly supposed to read about in the Quran?
*10)* We already know that the previous generations before us who were given scripture & guidance by Allah (SWT) went far astray and added all sorts of falsehoods and fake traditions to their religion, including the Talmud of the Jews (who also claim that it contains traditions of Moses as commentary of the Torah) and the writings of Paul & the Church, whom the Christians have given precedence over Jesus’ own words and have thereby begun to worship the Trinity and hold other false beliefs. With this in mind, shouldn’t we be wary that we TOO might also have gone astray from the pure teachings of God in the Quran? Wouldn’t it be foolish and careless of us to ignore the warnings of Allah (SWT) about the history of people of the scripture, and thus fail to consider that we might be deviating from the right path just as they did?
*11)* Finally, what WOULD the Quran actually have to say for you to accept that it is the only revelation brought down from God to the Prophet? The Quran already says COUNTLESS times that it is clear & lucid, sufficient for guidance, detailed & self-explanatory, unmatched & supreme, and perfectly preserved-so what else could the Quran then possibly say for you to finally give up and realize that it is what it claims to be?
I hope you will think about these questions sincerely. Salam.
@@celestialknight2339 This is a very poor understanding.
Here's a counter question, who was the Quran revealed to, who is it talking to?
@@MASSAM9669 The Quran was initially revealed to the Prophet Muhammad (Quran 47:2), but is talking to all peoples of all generations for all time to come (68:52, 2:21, 7:35, 76:29, 17:9)-just as is befitting of a universal message revealed by the All-Knowing & All-Wise Creator of the universe, who perfectly knows the past, present, and future. Now, how does that in any way answer even a single one of my questions above? If I supposedly have a “poor understanding” (simply by asking common-sense questions, it seems), then you should have no trouble at all answering those 11 questions of mine with great ease, and defending your position.
So instead of asking me random unrelated “counter question” that you perhaps think will trap me in a ‘gotcha’ moment, I would much rather you actually DEAL with the heart of this issue about the Sunnah/Hadith’s reliability & authority by ANSWERING my precise questions. So please, carefully consider them with an open mind and objective lens, and come back if you have a meaningful response. Peace.
@@celestialknight2339 Ye i disagree with that, i believe its secondary to everyone after, many verses clearly prove this
With your understanding, I could see why you would reject hadith, but its just not right...neither logically nor textually
@@MASSAM9669 Bring forth your proof if what you’re saying is true.
thanks for the arabic translate 🌹🌹
Alhamdulillah. May Allah gives best of health and strength to ustadz Adnan. Ameen
Excellent al humdulillaah Barakullaah fee kum
*11 Simple Questions for Traditional Muslims:*
*1)* Why is there not a SINGLE place in the entire Quran where a secondary scripture & divine revelation called the “Sunnah” or “Prophetic Hadith” is mentioned? Doesn’t the Quran constantly claim that it is clear & straightforward?
*2)* Why do the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” appear over and over again throughout the Quran, yet never ONCE refer to what traditional Muslims use them as? (as the inspired words & teachings of the Prophet); if there is actually a second scripture ordained by God called the Hadith, isn’t this quite deceptive and misleading?
*3)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of itself and it’s perfect guidance, lack of contradictions, and promise of its preservation, and so on, yet make NO such claim about the Hadith? Wouldn’t we expect that the Quran adds the phrase “ والسنة” (‘and the Sunnah’) in these verses where the Quran alone is mentioned?
*4)* Why does the “Sunnah” contradict the Quran in so many ways? For example, so-called “Sahih” Hadiths tell us that tiger and other animals are forbidden to eat, whereas the Quran is manifestly clear that the ONLY four prohibited foods are carrion, blood, pig’s meat, and idol-offerings. Or for example, Sahih Hadiths tell is that the Prophet will be an intercessor on Judgement Day for those in his Ummah who committed MAJOR sins, whereas the Quran clearly states that anyone who commits major sins and fails to repent will be condemned to Hell, and will have no protector, intercessor, or savior. How can these teachings be a “commentary” on the Quran (as sunni Muslims claim) when they blatantly contradict it?
*5)* Why do you say that the Sunnah (as supposedly preserved in the Hadith) is a commentary on the Quran, when you know that the Hadith is actually just a bunch of isolated sayings and doings of the Prophet and his companions, with less than 1% actually being direct commentary on the Quran? How can you claim this especially when considering the massive disagreement amongst traditional sects and scholars when it comes to Hadith-based theology, as well as numerous clear & major contradictions between the Quran and Hadith as shown above?
*6)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of the Torah and Gospel, as well as the Psalms and other scriptures of God-and call these “guidance” and “beacons of light”-while no such honorable mention is ever made of the supposed SECOND REVELATION that God allegedly sent down to the Prophet, which was the inspired Sunnah? How could God fail to prioritize mentioning the Hadith-which is supposedly REQUIRED for understanding the Quran itself-yet constantly mentions the amazing wonder & authority of the previous scriptures & revelations which we aren’t even required to follow anymore?
*7)* If we got rid of the Quran and just kept all the Hadith, don’t you think that the current traditional religion of Islam would still be perfectly intact? In other words, isn’t the Hadith alone sufficient for nearly everything you need to practice traditional Islam in its current form? What then is the need for the Quran under this framework? What other essential use does it provide that the Hadith cannot? And isn’t this why the Muslim scholars of the past admitted “the Quran is in more need of the Sunnah than the Sunnah is in need of the Quran”?
*8)* Why is there such a massive difference between the structure of the Quran and Hadith if they are both indeed co-equal legally-binding divine revelations brought down by God? For example, the Quran is preserved word-for-word, whereas the Hadith is only preserved meaning-to-meaning; the Quran is unique in style and incredibly easy to memorize & recite, whereas the Hadith is clearly human literature and was not made for easy memorization; the Quran is recited during worship, while the Hadith is not; and the list goes on. If both were equally divine revelations of God, why is this the case? Yet isn’t this exactly what we we’d expect if people FASELY attributed another work of literature as being revelation alongside the one true revelation? (Ex. like the Talmud was done to the Torah by the Jews)
*9)* If you were to give a copy of the Quran to an unbiased stranger who spoke fluent classical Arabic, and had them read the Quran for the first time, from beginning to end, and with no other source of information-would they come back to you confused and puzzled, and be asking you for the secondary scripture & co-divine revelation called the “Prophetic Sunnah & Hadith” that they were allegedly supposed to read about in the Quran?
*10)* We already know that the previous generations before us who were given scripture & guidance by Allah (SWT) went far astray and added all sorts of falsehoods and fake traditions to their religion, including the Talmud of the Jews (who also claim that it contains traditions of Moses as commentary of the Torah) and the writings of Paul & the Church, whom the Christians have given precedence over Jesus’ own words and have thereby begun to worship the Trinity and hold other false beliefs. With this in mind, shouldn’t we be wary that we TOO might also have gone astray from the pure teachings of God in the Quran? Wouldn’t it be foolish and careless of us to ignore the warnings of Allah (SWT) about the history of people of the scripture, and thus fail to consider that we might be deviating from the right path just as they did?
*11)* Finally, what WOULD the Quran actually have to say for you to accept that it is the only revelation brought down from God to the Prophet? The Quran already says COUNTLESS times that it is clear & lucid, sufficient for guidance, detailed & self-explanatory, unmatched & supreme, and perfectly preserved-so what else could the Quran then possibly say for you to finally give up and realize that it is what it claims to be?
I hope you will think about these questions sincerely. Salam.
@@celestialknight2339 instead of asking your many questions with contradictions, answer this one question on why you contradict yourself, Qur'an says follow hadith so why you reject it.
Quran 6 :89 - They are those whom We gave the Book, Al-Hukm (understanding of the religious laws), and Prophethood. But if these disbelieve therein (the Book, Al-Hukm and Prophethood), then, indeed We have entrusted it to a people (such as the Companions of Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) who are not disbelievers therein.
May Allah grant you best place in jannah.ameen
Loved this. Can’t wait for part 2
Such an honor to serve the cause of Islam. Wow.
It is impossible to follow Quran or even Islam without following hadith.Thank you Br Adnan for responding to hadith rejectors.
Allah says Quran is detailed and clear as well as complete. Than where do the Hadith come in? What more proof do we need to reject Ahadith?
@@Titan-ub5op can you stope copying and pasting the same cut and paste of Qur'an , its very ignorant of you! Qur'an does mention other revelations with it, see Qur'an 6 : 89!
see this verse on explanations of the Prophet peace & blessings on him (sunna) w/ Qur'an 16 : 64 - And We have not sent down the Book (the Qur'an) to you (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم), except that you may explain clearly unto them those things in which they differ, and (as) a guidance and a mercy for a folk who believe.
*11 Simple Questions for Traditional Muslims:*
*1)* Why is there not a SINGLE place in the entire Quran where a secondary scripture & divine revelation called the “Sunnah” or “Prophetic Hadith” is mentioned? Doesn’t the Quran constantly claim that it is clear & straightforward?
*2)* Why do the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” appear over and over again throughout the Quran, yet never ONCE refer to what traditional Muslims use them as? (as the inspired words & teachings of the Prophet); if there is actually a second scripture ordained by God called the Hadith, isn’t this quite deceptive and misleading?
*3)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of itself and it’s perfect guidance, lack of contradictions, and promise of its preservation, and so on, yet make NO such claim about the Hadith? Wouldn’t we expect that the Quran adds the phrase “ والسنة” (‘and the Sunnah’) in these verses where the Quran alone is mentioned?
*4)* Why does the “Sunnah” contradict the Quran in so many ways? For example, so-called “Sahih” Hadiths tell us that tiger and other animals are forbidden to eat, whereas the Quran is manifestly clear that the ONLY four prohibited foods are carrion, blood, pig’s meat, and idol-offerings. Or for example, Sahih Hadiths tell is that the Prophet will be an intercessor on Judgement Day for those in his Ummah who committed MAJOR sins, whereas the Quran clearly states that anyone who commits major sins and fails to repent will be condemned to Hell, and will have no protector, intercessor, or savior. How can these teachings be a “commentary” on the Quran (as sunni Muslims claim) when they blatantly contradict it?
*5)* Why do you say that the Sunnah (as supposedly preserved in the Hadith) is a commentary on the Quran, when you know that the Hadith is actually just a bunch of isolated sayings and doings of the Prophet and his companions, with less than 1% actually being direct commentary on the Quran? How can you claim this especially when considering the massive disagreement amongst traditional sects and scholars when it comes to Hadith-based theology, as well as numerous clear & major contradictions between the Quran and Hadith as shown above?
*6)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of the Torah and Gospel, as well as the Psalms and other scriptures of God-and call these “guidance” and “beacons of light”-while no such honorable mention is ever made of the supposed SECOND REVELATION that God allegedly sent down to the Prophet, which was the inspired Sunnah? How could God fail to prioritize mentioning the Hadith-which is supposedly REQUIRED for understanding the Quran itself-yet constantly mentions the amazing wonder & authority of the previous scriptures & revelations which we aren’t even required to follow anymore?
*7)* If we got rid of the Quran and just kept all the Hadith, don’t you think that the current traditional religion of Islam would still be perfectly intact? In other words, isn’t the Hadith alone sufficient for nearly everything you need to practice traditional Islam in its current form? What then is the need for the Quran under this framework? What other essential use does it provide that the Hadith cannot? And isn’t this why the Muslim scholars of the past admitted “the Quran is in more need of the Sunnah than the Sunnah is in need of the Quran”?
*8)* Why is there such a massive difference between the structure of the Quran and Hadith if they are both indeed co-equal legally-binding divine revelations brought down by God? For example, the Quran is preserved word-for-word, whereas the Hadith is only preserved meaning-to-meaning; the Quran is unique in style and incredibly easy to memorize & recite, whereas the Hadith is clearly human literature and was not made for easy memorization; the Quran is recited during worship, while the Hadith is not; and the list goes on. If both were equally divine revelations of God, why is this the case? Yet isn’t this exactly what we we’d expect if people FASELY attributed another work of literature as being revelation alongside the one true revelation? (Ex. like the Talmud was done to the Torah by the Jews)
*9)* If you were to give a copy of the Quran to an unbiased stranger who spoke fluent classical Arabic, and had them read the Quran for the first time, from beginning to end, and with no other source of information-would they come back to you confused and puzzled, and be asking you for the secondary scripture & co-divine revelation called the “Prophetic Sunnah & Hadith” that they were allegedly supposed to read about in the Quran?
*10)* We already know that the previous generations before us who were given scripture & guidance by Allah (SWT) went far astray and added all sorts of falsehoods and fake traditions to their religion, including the Talmud of the Jews (who also claim that it contains traditions of Moses as commentary of the Torah) and the writings of Paul & the Church, whom the Christians have given precedence over Jesus’ own words and have thereby begun to worship the Trinity and hold other false beliefs. With this in mind, shouldn’t we be wary that we TOO might also have gone astray from the pure teachings of God in the Quran? Wouldn’t it be foolish and careless of us to ignore the warnings of Allah (SWT) about the history of people of the scripture, and thus fail to consider that we might be deviating from the right path just as they did?
*11)* Finally, what WOULD the Quran actually have to say for you to accept that it is the only revelation brought down from God to the Prophet? The Quran already says COUNTLESS times that it is clear & lucid, sufficient for guidance, detailed & self-explanatory, unmatched & supreme, and perfectly preserved-so what else could the Quran then possibly say for you to finally give up and realize that it is what it claims to be?
I hope you will think about these questions sincerely. Salam.
@@celestialknight2339 answered the ayats above first, stop being ignorant of the Qur'an and then claiming to follow it!
Jazakallah add for Arabic subtitle.
Mashallah ❤️
May Allah bless u brother
These Sufi saints-Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti, Sheikh Nizamuddin Auliya, Hazrat Shah Jalal, Baba Fariduddin Ganjshakar, Makhdum Shah Daulah Shahid, Hazrat Ali Hujwiri (Data Ganj Baksh), Shah Waliullah Dehlawi, Pir Hazrat Shah Bahauddin Naqshband, Hazrat Khwaja Baqi Billah, Khwaja Garibullah, Sheikh Alauddin Sabir Kaliyari, and Hazrat Shah Niyaz Ahmad Barelvi-are enough proof to say that Quranists are deluded in their rejection of hadith. These towering figures of Islam, who spread the faith across the Indian subcontinent, never abandoned a single hadith and upheld both the Qur'an and the Sunnah in their teachings and practice. Their lives reflect the integral role of hadith in Islamic spirituality and guidance.
May Allah bless you and your family always. Jazaka Allah khairan.
Thank you brother adnan! Fantastic explanation!
One thing I've learned is the more you know the less you know
Imam al-Barbahari (rahimahullah) stated: “Know that Allah’s Messenger (Peace be upon him) said: “My ummah will divide into 73 sects, all of them will be in the Fire except for one, and that is the Jamā’ah.” It was said, “And who are they, O Allah’s Messenger?” He (Peace be upon him) responded, “That which I and my Companions are upon today. (Tirmidhi, no. 2641)
بارك الله فيك و جعله في ميزان حسناتك يا شيخ ❤
I go to the Book of Allah "The Qur'an" in order to understand what my lord wants me to do.🙏
ALLAH swt said in Surat Ibrahim verse 52.
(This ˹Quran˺ is a ˹sufficient˺ message for humanity so that they may take it as a warning and know that there is only One God, and so that people of reason may be mindful.)
❤
Barik’Allah brother !!!! These mushriks are deceived. They are worst in opposition of the Haqq.
@@UltraXIX
They follow manmade books and they think that they are on the right path.😂
@@HamzaMalik-ez4ro my man… it’s crazy. A Persian from Bukhara must explain the Quran when it was revealed 200 years before them 🤣 mushrik logic. So all wise God can’t explain it to humanity 🤣. Quran tells us “do not discriminate between the messengers” 2:136 and they always talk about Gods final prophet Muhammad… it’s crazy how they reason. I truly believe that they hate the last Prophet Muhammad… they thinks it’s okay to have text of him when having sex with 11 women’s at one night. The Muhammad from the Koran is not the same of the Hadith.
Praise be to El Eelah for your knowledge.
Salam mulaikom Hamza
@@UltraXIX
Thanks to ALLAH for preserving the Qur'an & making it easier to understand for all
Of us, Otherwise they would mislead us from the way of ALLAH swt.
Thank you my brother.
@@HamzaMalik-ez4ro thank you for your beautiful words. When the deceivers come destroy them with their own ahadith.
The Quran is the best HADITH
SUNAN IBN Majah 215
It was narrated that Anas bin Malik said:
"The Messenger of Allah said: 'Allah has His own people among mankind.' They said: 'O Messenger of Allah, who are they?' He said: 'The people of the Qur'an, the people of Allah and those who are closest to Him.'"
Conclusion ? The peoples of the Quran are the closest to the Allah 🤣
Haha keep marching in name of GOD 9:38.
Victory is ours Insha’Allah 🥰
Ma Sha Allah,,,My favourite speaker. Love you Adnan bhai. I want to meet you once in my life.❤
You will meet him in jahanam 🤣🤣🤣
The job of the prophet was to preach Allah(SWT) revelation, through his actions and through Allah(SWT) words to best of his ability. It’s up to Allah to guide you once your heart acknowledges the truth.
جزاك الله خيرا
Subhaanallah excellent...may Allah reward you with Abundance..Ameen..
He claims hadith rejection is relatively new when in truth it has been practiced from the time of prophet Muhammad. According to traditions the prophet himself disallowed recording of hadith, Caliph Umar and companions disallowed the prophet to write other than Quran on his deathbed as recorded in "sahih" hadith, Abu Bakr burned his own hadith, Caliph Umar banned transmission of hadith, collected and burned hadith etc. Imam Abu Hanifah rejected many hadith, Imam Malik rejected so-called sound hadith frequently etc.
Various people in recent times challenged hadith, e.g. shah wali allah, shawkani, sayid ahmed khan, from Egypt we have muhammad abu and Sidqi and mahmoud abu riah, etc.
You have a complete misunderstanding of those narrations. Umar ibn al khattab stopped the prophet PBUH because he was severely ill and so that he may rest some time and get better and then communicate.
75:16-19 completely debunks this hadith rejection. It is a proof that the quran needs a secondary explanation that was explained to the prophet PBUH which we have in the form of hadith
@@Ahle.haq0 how do those verses prove what you claim?
With references from The Quran itself, lets see what God says about The Quran:
We have sent down to you clear verses... [2:99]
Shall I seek other than GOD as a judge when He has sent down to you the book fully clarified? Those whom We have given the book know it is sent down from your Lord with truth; so do not be of those who have doubt. And the word of your Lord is completed with truth and justice, there is no changing His words. He is the Hearer, the Knower. [6:114-115]
And this your Lord's straight path; We have clarified the revelations to a people who remember. [6:126]
And We have come to them with a book which We have distinguished with knowledge; a guide and a mercy to those who have faith. [7:52]
This Quran could not have been produced without GOD, but it is to authenticate what is already present, and to clarify the book in which there is no doubt from the Lord of the worlds. [10:37]
A.L.R., a book whose verses were made decisive, then clarified from One who is Wise, Expert. [11:1]
In their stories is a lesson for the people of intelligence. It was not a saying that was invented, but an authentication of what is already present and a clarification of all things, and a guidance and mercy to a people who have faith. [12:111]
And the day We send in every nation a witness against them from themselves, and We have brought you as a witness against these. And We have sent down to you the Book as a explanation for all things, and a guide and mercy and good tidings to the Submitters. [16:89]
...And everything We have distinctly/clearly explained. [17:12]
And We have cited in this Quran every example for the people. But man was always most argumentative. [18:54]
Say: 'if the sea were an inkwell for the words of my Lord, then the sea would run out before the words of my Lord run out; even if we were to bring another like it for its aid'. [18:109]
O you who faith, let those whom your right hand possesses and the children who have not attained puberty request permission from you at three times. Before the Dawn salat, and when you are changing your clothes at noon, and after the Dusk salat. These are three private times for you. At other times, it is not wrong for you or them to mingle with one another. GOD thus clarifies the revelations for you. And GOD is Knowledgeable, Wise. [24:58]
A revelation from the Almighty, The Merciful: A scripture whose verses are made distinct/clear, a reading in Arabic for people who know. [41:2-3]
And by the clear scripture. [44:2]
@@info786 why do you dodge my clear ayat that I have presented. The verses you have presented are regarding the basics of the religion and regarding disbelievers. The first example you presented is regarding the Jews and the stories of the past they hided which Allah had cleared them in the clear verses of the surah Al baqarah
@@info786 the second passage is again directed towards the disbelievers in the fundamental beliefs. Now let's talk about the verses I presented.
"Do not rush your tongue trying to memorize ˹a revelation of˺ the Quran. It is certainly upon Us to ˹make you˺ memorize and recite it.
Then it is surely upon Us to make it clear ˹to you˺. "
Al qiyamah 16-19
If the verses of the Quran were clear then they don't need more clearance. But here in the 19th verse Allah tells the prophet to not worry he will clear the verses. So it is said that the Quran is clear in the fundamental beliefs and the stories of the past. But not about fiqh. This is proven simply from the fact that the places the Quran talks about it being clear are the places where it addresses the disbelievers and the fundamental dispute with them is not about whether to pay the zakat as per gold or silver Nisab but rather on the fundamental beliefs
Hadith rejectors have no grounds yet they are ignorant in their claims.
*11 Simple Questions for Traditional Muslims:*
*1)* Why is there not a SINGLE place in the entire Quran where a secondary scripture & divine revelation called the “Sunnah” or “Prophetic Hadith” is mentioned? Doesn’t the Quran constantly claim that it is clear & straightforward?
*2)* Why do the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” appear over and over again throughout the Quran, yet never ONCE refer to what traditional Muslims use them as? (as the inspired words & teachings of the Prophet); if there is actually a second scripture ordained by God called the Hadith, isn’t this quite deceptive and misleading?
*3)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of itself and it’s perfect guidance, lack of contradictions, and promise of its preservation, and so on, yet make NO such claim about the Hadith? Wouldn’t we expect that the Quran adds the phrase “ والسنة” (‘and the Sunnah’) in these verses where the Quran alone is mentioned?
*4)* Why does the “Sunnah” contradict the Quran in so many ways? For example, so-called “Sahih” Hadiths tell us that tiger and other animals are forbidden to eat, whereas the Quran is manifestly clear that the ONLY four prohibited foods are carrion, blood, pig’s meat, and idol-offerings. Or for example, Sahih Hadiths tell is that the Prophet will be an intercessor on Judgement Day for those in his Ummah who committed MAJOR sins, whereas the Quran clearly states that anyone who commits major sins and fails to repent will be condemned to Hell, and will have no protector, intercessor, or savior. How can these teachings be a “commentary” on the Quran (as sunni Muslims claim) when they blatantly contradict it?
*5)* Why do you say that the Sunnah (as supposedly preserved in the Hadith) is a commentary on the Quran, when you know that the Hadith is actually just a bunch of isolated sayings and doings of the Prophet and his companions, with less than 1% actually being direct commentary on the Quran? How can you claim this especially when considering the massive disagreement amongst traditional sects and scholars when it comes to Hadith-based theology, as well as numerous clear & major contradictions between the Quran and Hadith as shown above?
*6)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of the Torah and Gospel, as well as the Psalms and other scriptures of God-and call these “guidance” and “beacons of light”-while no such honorable mention is ever made of the supposed SECOND REVELATION that God allegedly sent down to the Prophet, which was the inspired Sunnah? How could God fail to prioritize mentioning the Hadith-which is supposedly REQUIRED for understanding the Quran itself-yet constantly mentions the amazing wonder & authority of the previous scriptures & revelations which we aren’t even required to follow anymore?
*7)* If we got rid of the Quran and just kept all the Hadith, don’t you think that the current traditional religion of Islam would still be perfectly intact? In other words, isn’t the Hadith alone sufficient for nearly everything you need to practice traditional Islam in its current form? What then is the need for the Quran under this framework? What other essential use does it provide that the Hadith cannot? And isn’t this why the Muslim scholars of the past admitted “the Quran is in more need of the Sunnah than the Sunnah is in need of the Quran”?
*8)* Why is there such a massive difference between the structure of the Quran and Hadith if they are both indeed co-equal legally-binding divine revelations brought down by God? For example, the Quran is preserved word-for-word, whereas the Hadith is only preserved meaning-to-meaning; the Quran is unique in style and incredibly easy to memorize & recite, whereas the Hadith is clearly human literature and was not made for easy memorization; the Quran is recited during worship, while the Hadith is not; and the list goes on. If both were equally divine revelations of God, why is this the case? Yet isn’t this exactly what we we’d expect if people FASELY attributed another work of literature as being revelation alongside the one true revelation? (Ex. like the Talmud was done to the Torah by the Jews)
*9)* If you were to give a copy of the Quran to an unbiased stranger who spoke fluent classical Arabic, and had them read the Quran for the first time, from beginning to end, and with no other source of information-would they come back to you confused and puzzled, and be asking you for the secondary scripture & co-divine revelation called the “Prophetic Sunnah & Hadith” that they were allegedly supposed to read about in the Quran?
*10)* We already know that the previous generations before us who were given scripture & guidance by Allah (SWT) went far astray and added all sorts of falsehoods and fake traditions to their religion, including the Talmud of the Jews (who also claim that it contains traditions of Moses as commentary of the Torah) and the writings of Paul & the Church, whom the Christians have given precedence over Jesus’ own words and have thereby begun to worship the Trinity and hold other false beliefs. With this in mind, shouldn’t we be wary that we TOO might also have gone astray from the pure teachings of God in the Quran? Wouldn’t it be foolish and careless of us to ignore the warnings of Allah (SWT) about the history of people of the scripture, and thus fail to consider that we might be deviating from the right path just as they did?
*11)* Finally, what WOULD the Quran actually have to say for you to accept that it is the only revelation brought down from God to the Prophet? The Quran already says COUNTLESS times that it is clear & lucid, sufficient for guidance, detailed & self-explanatory, unmatched & supreme, and perfectly preserved-so what else could the Quran then possibly say for you to finally give up and realize that it is what it claims to be?
I hope you will think about these questions sincerely. Salam.
Hadith Acceptors have no ground. They go against the Quran. The Quran clearly says that is a detailed and clear explanation of all things and it is complete.
References:
16:89,12:111
Now what is the need pf Ahadith when God clearly says this in the Quran.
Qur'an mentions revelation and explanations with Qur'an so its part of the message and Qur'an says these will be preserved by Sahabas Radiyallahu anhum. Read Quran 16: 64 and Qur'an 6 : 89 as an example!
Allah: Warns about homosexuality
Quranists: no no homosexuality is fine
Allah: Sacrifice animal
Quranist : no no it's just metaphor for Ibrahim
Allah: I created Adam from clay
Quranist: no no it's just a story. Adam doesn't exist
Allah: promised to preserve His religion
Quranist: no no muslims follow corrupted Islam
Allah: fight the disbelievers
Quranist: no no it means hug them
Allah: when you are in dispute refer it to Allah AND His Messenger
Quranist: no no we refer it to our deity edip yuksel
Allah: send salutation on the Prophet
Quranist: oh heck no
Allah: follow the Messenger
Quranist: huh what? I couldn't hear
masha.a allah adnan rashid is my favorite for real. allah yahafdek o yjazik o yatilelk matetmena . 3 dislike from khawarij xD .
Jazaak allahu khairan
Who gave the knowledge to mohammed there was only one sunnah that was the creators
What?
Imam al-Barbahari (rahimahullah) stated: “Know that Allah’s Messenger (Peace be upon him) said: “My ummah will divide into 73 sects, all of them will be in the Fire except for one, and that is the Jamā’ah.” It was said, “And who are they, O Allah’s Messenger?” He (Peace be upon him) responded, “That which I and my Companions are upon today. (Tirmidhi, no. 2641)
Who authorised this hadith was it Allah or Muhammed who and who authorised all the hadith they are 650000 books of hadith but none of them explains the quran because quran explains its self
@@shahzarkhan1966
I love hadis along with millions of Muslims. Your religion is with you and my religion is with mine. Does anyone force you to read them?
@@shahzarkhan1966
The physical appearance of Al Mahdi narrated in the hadis resembles Muhammad Bin Salman.
Asalamu Aleykum akhi, I wish you would have a lecture in Sweden in the future. Allahumma Barik
Mashallah
25:30 The messenger said, "My Lord, my people have deserted this Quran.
Please explain how this verse is applied. How I see it, its talking about you, correct me if I'm wrong.
He doesn’t need to explain YOUR misapprehension. Hadith rejectors love this verse whereas it has nothing to do with following Hadith. Following Hadith does not in any way exclude following the Qur’an.
Surah Al Kahf, Verse 6, "Yet, perhaps, (O Prophet) you would consume yourself sorrowing upon their traces, if they will not believe in this divine discourse." Hadith has different meaning; a discourse or tradition. It can refer to Quran or other revelation such as narrations of the prophet also Hadith Qudsi. Imho. We need to study all the divine and other knowledge.
*11 Simple Questions for Traditional Muslims:*
*1)* Why is there not a SINGLE place in the entire Quran where a secondary scripture & divine revelation called the “Sunnah” or “Prophetic Hadith” is mentioned? Doesn’t the Quran constantly claim that it is clear & straightforward?
*2)* Why do the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” appear over and over again throughout the Quran, yet never ONCE refer to what traditional Muslims use them as? (as the inspired words & teachings of the Prophet); if there is actually a second scripture ordained by God called the Hadith, isn’t this quite deceptive and misleading?
*3)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of itself and it’s perfect guidance, lack of contradictions, and promise of its preservation, and so on, yet make NO such claim about the Hadith? Wouldn’t we expect that the Quran adds the phrase “ والسنة” (‘and the Sunnah’) in these verses where the Quran alone is mentioned?
*4)* Why does the “Sunnah” contradict the Quran in so many ways? For example, so-called “Sahih” Hadiths tell us that tiger and other animals are forbidden to eat, whereas the Quran is manifestly clear that the ONLY four prohibited foods are carrion, blood, pig’s meat, and idol-offerings. Or for example, Sahih Hadiths tell is that the Prophet will be an intercessor on Judgement Day for those in his Ummah who committed MAJOR sins, whereas the Quran clearly states that anyone who commits major sins and fails to repent will be condemned to Hell, and will have no protector, intercessor, or savior. How can these teachings be a “commentary” on the Quran (as sunni Muslims claim) when they blatantly contradict it?
*5)* Why do you say that the Sunnah (as supposedly preserved in the Hadith) is a commentary on the Quran, when you know that the Hadith is actually just a bunch of isolated sayings and doings of the Prophet and his companions, with less than 1% actually being direct commentary on the Quran? How can you claim this especially when considering the massive disagreement amongst traditional sects and scholars when it comes to Hadith-based theology, as well as numerous clear & major contradictions between the Quran and Hadith as shown above?
*6)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of the Torah and Gospel, as well as the Psalms and other scriptures of God-and call these “guidance” and “beacons of light”-while no such honorable mention is ever made of the supposed SECOND REVELATION that God allegedly sent down to the Prophet, which was the inspired Sunnah? How could God fail to prioritize mentioning the Hadith-which is supposedly REQUIRED for understanding the Quran itself-yet constantly mentions the amazing wonder & authority of the previous scriptures & revelations which we aren’t even required to follow anymore?
*7)* If we got rid of the Quran and just kept all the Hadith, don’t you think that the current traditional religion of Islam would still be perfectly intact? In other words, isn’t the Hadith alone sufficient for nearly everything you need to practice traditional Islam in its current form? What then is the need for the Quran under this framework? What other essential use does it provide that the Hadith cannot? And isn’t this why the Muslim scholars of the past admitted “the Quran is in more need of the Sunnah than the Sunnah is in need of the Quran”?
*8)* Why is there such a massive difference between the structure of the Quran and Hadith if they are both indeed co-equal legally-binding divine revelations brought down by God? For example, the Quran is preserved word-for-word, whereas the Hadith is only preserved meaning-to-meaning; the Quran is unique in style and incredibly easy to memorize & recite, whereas the Hadith is clearly human literature and was not made for easy memorization; the Quran is recited during worship, while the Hadith is not; and the list goes on. If both were equally divine revelations of God, why is this the case? Yet isn’t this exactly what we we’d expect if people FASELY attributed another work of literature as being revelation alongside the one true revelation? (Ex. like the Talmud was done to the Torah by the Jews)
*9)* If you were to give a copy of the Quran to an unbiased stranger who spoke fluent classical Arabic, and had them read the Quran for the first time, from beginning to end, and with no other source of information-would they come back to you confused and puzzled, and be asking you for the secondary scripture & co-divine revelation called the “Prophetic Sunnah & Hadith” that they were allegedly supposed to read about in the Quran?
*10)* We already know that the previous generations before us who were given scripture & guidance by Allah (SWT) went far astray and added all sorts of falsehoods and fake traditions to their religion, including the Talmud of the Jews (who also claim that it contains traditions of Moses as commentary of the Torah) and the writings of Paul & the Church, whom the Christians have given precedence over Jesus’ own words and have thereby begun to worship the Trinity and hold other false beliefs. With this in mind, shouldn’t we be wary that we TOO might also have gone astray from the pure teachings of God in the Quran? Wouldn’t it be foolish and careless of us to ignore the warnings of Allah (SWT) about the history of people of the scripture, and thus fail to consider that we might be deviating from the right path just as they did?
*11)* Finally, what WOULD the Quran actually have to say for you to accept that it is the only revelation brought down from God to the Prophet? The Quran already says COUNTLESS times that it is clear & lucid, sufficient for guidance, detailed & self-explanatory, unmatched & supreme, and perfectly preserved-so what else could the Quran then possibly say for you to finally give up and realize that it is what it claims to be?
I hope you will think about these questions sincerely. Salam.
It's not that simple:
-Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, 'There is *NONE* born among the OFF-SPRING of ADAM, but *SATAN* TOUCHES it .. ***EXCEPT*** MARY and her CHILD" (JESUS) -Bukhari 3431 (or 641), Grade: *Sahih (Authentic)*
-This was *required* to solve the problem below.
The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: "Adam denied, so his offspring denied, and Adam forgot and his offspring forgot, and *ADAM SINNED,* so *HIS OFFSPRING SINNED."*
-Jami` at-Tirmidhi 3076 (Vol. 5, Bk 46, #3076)
*This locked mankind out of Paradise:*
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying: There was argument.. *MOSES* said to *ADAM:* You are our father. *YOU* did us HARM and *CAUSED US* to get *OUT OF PARADISE.* ADAM said to him: You are Moses. Allah selected you (for *DIRECT CONVERSATION* with you) and wrote with *His own Hand* the Book (Torah) for you. DESPITE this you BLAME ME.. Allah's Apostle (ﷺ) said:. This is how Adam came the better of Moses.. [NOTE: Moses could *NOT* get people back into Paradise. Only a *New Adam* - the Messiah could get people back into Paradise]
-Grade: *Sahih (Authentic)*
-Muslim 2652a
The Prophet (ﷺ) said, " *Adam* and *Moses* debated.. *Moses said,* 'You are *Adam* who turned out *YOUR OFFSPRING* from PARADISE.' *Adam said,* ‘You are Moses whom Allah chose for His Message and for His direct talk, yet you *BLAME ME* for A MATTER which had been *ORDAINED FOR ME* even BEFORE my creation?' Thus *ADAM OVERCAME MOSES."* -[NOTE: Moses could *NOT* get people back into Paradise. Only a *New Adam* - the Massih could get people back into Paradise]
-Grade: *Sahih (Authentic)*
-Bukhari 7515 or (9,93,606)
*Souls being prone to Sin are not allowed in heaven.* But Jesus is *SINLESS* and Will Always Be (3:46; 6:8; 19:19). This is why Allah raised up Jesus to himself (4:158). This is WHY Jesus is ALIVE in heaven right now (4:157-158).
This also explains why doing *GOOD DEEDS* alone can *NOT* get someone into Paradise:
The Prophet (ﷺ) said: "..one's GOOD DEEDS will *NOT* make him enter Paradise." They asked, *EVEN YOU,* O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)?" He said, *"EVEN I,* unless and until Allah bestows His *PARDON* and *MERCY* on me."
-Bukhari 6466 or (8,76,473)
One thing that *IS REQUIRED,* is before you die, you MUST BELIEVE in Jesus *SPECIFICALLY* - this is *REQUIRED* to goto heaven, because he will COME AGAIN on the Last Day (4:159; 43:61):
Surat 4:159 there is **NONE** from the People of the Book **BUT** he that will ***SURELY BELIEVE IN JESUS*** before his death. And on the DAY OF JUDGEMENT he [Iesa] wiill be a **WITNESS AGAINST THEM** -(ie: Iesa will say he does not know you. Remember *unlike other Prophets,* Iesa is the Massih and ALIVE in heaven right NOW.)
Since a baby he was a sign to all worlds - He is the Word of Allah, the Spirit of Allah, and forever Sinless not needing repentance like other Prophets - this is why Allah took Iesa up *to Himself,* and this is why WE can now be resurrected and enter Paradise eternally).
@@AlphaOmega888 My friend, Christianity is mislead. Jesus is not God-we can literally see a development in his image as we go from the earliest Gospel (Mark) to the latest one (John), as the stories about him change and his entire character is radically re-represented. Just compare the gospels yourself by reading them vertically with one another. See Dr. Bart Ehrman’s lectures on RUclips for more info; it’s some serious red-pill stuff, and it confirms the Quran’s depiction despite coming “600 years later”-which is one of Jesus having claimed to be no more than the Jewish Messiah and God’s prophet-exactly what the scholarly consensus is now.
Also, the whole issue of salvation is wrong in Christianity; it deviates from the Old Testament in which God simply asks for a repentant heart. How do you think God forgave the entire city of Nineveh? Or when He forgave David of his alleged murder and lust, when David explicitly cried out to God saying that he has no sacrificial offering but only a repentant heart? God freely forgave him for that. Such is God’s mercy & forgiveness-the same forgiveness of God that Christ preached about when He told people to turn back to God before the coming of the Kingdom, and to serve Him alone-his Lord and theirs. This has been the consistent message of God’s prophets throughout history, but Roman pagan-influenced Christians and misguided individuals such as Paul deviated from this pristine message of Christ and the prophets before him; they claimed that faith alone is required for salvation and that the law is done away with, whereas Christ himself is reported to have consistently said that works are also necessary (Mark 10:18-onwards) and that the Law shall not be abrogated (Matthew 5:17-20).
Moreover, for God to murder someone innocent (Christ) is neither mercy nor justice. It is not mercy because God still demands blood punishment when He can simply forgive (since He’s the one who MADE THE RULES in the first place), and it isn’t justice either because punishing an innocent person on behalf of the guilty-even if they voluntarily do it-is an insult to true justice, which demands that only the guilty bear their own load (as Ezekiel 18 itself clearly teaches). There are other serious problems as well: if some sins require eternity in Hellfire as punishment, then shouldn’t have Christ remained in Hellfire for eternity to pay, rather than just 3 days? Also, if only the human nature of Jesus (who is by definition the “god-man”) died on the cross, then what was the point of incarnating in the first place? But if the divine nature of Jesus also died, then God died-that is literally a self-contradictory irrational statement, and one which fiercely opposes Biblical scripture. Yet if only one nature of Christ died, and not both, then Jesus didn’t actually die, since his one person is inseparable from the two natures. It all makes no sense.
But we can rest assured that Jesus never actually taught any of this-he simply reiterated the same message as the prophets before him: to serve God alone-his Lord and their Lord-and to treat your neighbor as yourself; these two are the GREATEST commandments according to Jesus (Mark 12:29-33). Serve the Creator, and do good to the creation. The most simply & profound religious message.
Besides, if believing in the atonement of Jesus was the only thing required for salvation, then what’s the purpose of life? God just put us on this earth after CREATING sin, only to then send his alleged son/Himself to die for us 2,000 years ago and leave us back at square one where we have no real purpose but to rejoice in His solution to the problem that He Himself created? It doesn’t make any sense my friend, and you know it. The fact that we have a limited time on this earth, and have senses & limbs, and free will to do good vs. evil, manifestly shows that the purpose of this life is a TEST-just as the Quran teaches; that God has created death and life in order to test us as to which of us behaves more excellently & with virtue. So no, if a person murders and rapes his whole life but believes that Christ atoned for him, it is by no means justice that this person gets eternal life, as Christian theology suggests. Rather, that person will be judged by God and will suffer immensely in the afterlife should they fail to repent to God and turn from their ways. True justice.
You know that all of this is clearly confusing and doesn’t resonate with your mind and heart. So come back to the original message of Christ and all the prophets before him, which is to have faith AND work righteous deeds, all for the sake of God alone, that by His GRACE and MERCY you should get to know Him and be granted everlasting life with Him in the end. That is God’s promise; and God never breaks His promises.
So as a person of the scripture, do not go to extremes in your theology beyond the truth, and do not follow the whims & opinions of people who went far astray in the past, and who mislead many, and who themselves strayed far off the straight path.
And indeed, God Almighty-YHWH your Lord, the Creator of heaven and earth-speaks directly to you, so take heed to what your Lord says:
*_”O people of the Scripture! Do not go too far in your theology, and do not say anything about God but the truth! The Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary, is only God’s messenger, as well as His Word which He cast into Mary, and a spirit from Him! So believe in God and His messengers, and do not speak of a trinity! Stop it-it is for your own good! God is one sole divinity, who is far above having a son! He owns everything in the heavens and everything on earth; and God is able to manage it all on His own!”_*
And He also solemnly declares to you all:
*_”O you who received the Scripture & Covenant! Believe in what We have sent down, verifying & fulfilling what is with you, before We wipe out faces and turn them backward, or curse them like We cursed the violators of the Sabbath! And God’s will is always done!”_*
------------------------
*_”O people of the Scripture! Our messenger has come to you, clarifying for you much of what you kept hidden of the Scripture, and overlooking much! A light from God has come to you, and a clear Book!”_*
*_”God guides with it whoever follows His approval to the ways of peace, and He brings them out of darkness into light, by His permission, and He guides them in a straight path!”_*
*_”O People of the Scripture! Our messenger has come to you, making things clear to you-after a cessation of messengers-so that none of you can say, “No preacher had come to us, nor any warner!” And so a preacher has now come to you, and a warner! And God is Capable of all things!”_*
------------------------
Full free translation of the Noble Recitation (Quran): clearquran.com
@@AlphaOmega888 crucifiction attempt on Jesus to remove laws will make his ppl lose blessings in mathew 21 :43 & jeremia 31 :36. pauls in acts 9 : 3 saw devil of luke 10 :18 went to Arabia, is lawless false prophet in mathew 24 :11 thought he's who will correct him - comforter in John 1 :21 & 16 :8, Prophet law giver like Musa is Muhammad peace and blessings on him!
Jesus is only sent to his tribe, after mark 16 : 8 Jesus's 2nd appearance saying he's sent for the world is an admitted fabrication. isaiah 49 says Jesus will leave his tribe and return following the light of nations of isaiah 42, a new covenent, from the Arab Prophet from mt selah Medina, this is clearly Islam.
Abraham wasn't from juda, juda came like 2 centuries later, Ibrahim and Ismael were Muslims who built the Kaba, even Jacob imitates the hajj in genesis 28!
@@AlphaOmega888 It begins and ends with Islam just like Ismael is older then Isaaq and the bible lies and says he wasn't in the covenent in Genesis 17 : 20, it says Ismael is blessed & I bless Issak but you bible changed the AND into a "BUT". very dishonest. and similarly Jesus will follow Muhammad peace and blessings n him!
Q2:173 He has ONLY forbidden to you dead animals, blood, the
flesh of swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah
. But whoever is forced [by necessity], neither desiring [it] nor transgressing
[its limit], there is no sin upon him. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.
Here Allah stresses that there are ONLY four dietary prohibitions
Q16:115-116 He has ONLY forbidden to you dead animals, blood, the
esh of
swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah. But whoever is forced [by necessity], neither desiring [it] nor transgressing [its limit] - then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. And do not say about what your tongues assert of untruth, " This is lawful and this is unlawful" to invent falsehood about Allah . Indeed, those who invent falsehood about Allah will not succeed.
Allah repeats that there are only four prohibitions and those who say (all the hadith collectors and followers) there
are other extra prohibitions are inventing falsehood about Allah
Q6:145-149 Say, I DO NOT FIND in what has been revealed to me
anything forbidden to eat except carrion, running blood, swine
which is impure or a sinful offering in the name of any other than
Allah. But if someone is compelled by necessity neither driven by desire nor exceeding immediat need then surely your Lord is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful."
Interestingly, here Allah commands everyone to declare that they have understood there there are only four dietary prohibitions.
Q6:150 Say, Bring forward your witnesses who will testify
that Allah has prohibited this." And if they testify, DO NOT TESTIFY with them. And do not follow the desires of those who deny Our verses and those who do not believe in the Hereafter, while they equate [others] with their Lord.
Finally Allah commands us to reject any other prohibitions no matter how
convincing testimony (Bukhari, Muslim, Musnad etc. ) is presented. No reasoning, convincing, discussions !! Simple rejection !
This is a big slap on the face of all the hadith idolators who use manmade fabrications to twinst the simple to understand word of Allah. Most of these people run away from answering this question.
Hadith rejecters is in fact the Quran rejectors and their end destination is rejection of Islam altogether and I have seen this with my own eyes
Surah An-Nisa, Verse 65:
فَلَا وَرَبِّكَ لَا يُؤْمِنُونَ حَتَّىٰ يُحَكِّمُوكَ فِيمَا شَجَرَ بَيْنَهُمْ ثُمَّ لَا يَجِدُوا فِي أَنفُسِهِمْ حَرَجًا مِّمَّا قَضَيْتَ وَيُسَلِّمُوا تَسْلِيمًا
But nay, by thy Lord, they will not believe (in truth) until they make thee judge of what is in dispute between them and find within themselves no dislike of that which thou decidest, and submit with full submission.
(English - Pickthal)
@@NaveedBashirJanjua Answer the question that I asked above. Do not dodge. Based on the above verses:
(1) Do you believe that there are ONLY 4 dietry prohibitions accordint to Allah ?
(2) Do you believe that anybody (hadith collectors of both shiit and sunni sects, ulema, scholar, hadith followers) who comes with any extra prohibition is inventing falsehood ?
(3) Do you unconditionally reject the testimony of those people who give you prohibitions other than the ones explicitly mentioned in the Quran ?
If your answer to any of the three questions above is no, then you simply reject the very clear and unambiguos statements of Allah.
What is the context of this ayat?
@@yasirahmed1707 Try to answer and do not run away from answering to the point.
@@adilrasheedonline
if hadiths are fabricated then they ran as well is fabricated as its dots and diacritics, in general, were transmitted just like authentic hadiths with a chain of transmission and of the same poeple who transmitted hadiths as well untill they were written and canonized in the 9-10th century
Thats why today you only read one of the readings(qiraat) of the quran rather than the other 30+ it's because of the same science and lots of same poeple who transmitted hadiths
اللهم صل وسلم وبارك على سيدنا ونبينا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه وسلم . بارك الله فيك شيخ ونفع الناس بعلمكم .
امين
It is a great talk on the subject Sheikh. Let me tell you what you will probably know already that Hadeeth denial started simultaneously in the Indian subcontinent and Egypt and it was during British rule in both countries. It could have been a British and Jewish conspiracy. It will be pertinent to point out that Qadianiat started about the same time.
First ones were Shian e Ali , a political party of Ali (rta), the Khwarij were a splinter group of Shian e Ali .
Allah swt bless you brother
Respect to ADNAN ....ABOUT PARENTS...SALUTE...2O23
May Allah accept your efforts and help all of those who defend the sunnah of rasullullah ﷺ. For those who is interested in this topic, u can read a book named "From a loving son to a loving father" written by Shahid Hassan. It talks about why is it absurd to reject the hadith and bring proofs from al Quran as to why one should comply with the sunnah of rasullullah ﷺ .The book is free to download.
You’re master Adnan does not speak about the sunna of Rasoul Allah but about the prophet. Navi and rasoul are not the same. Pay more intention before you react.
Great lecture ustad ji. Can you please give a lecture on which Islamic books to read? I think ustad ji you should give a lecture as how to one should start reading book or material.
How to start reading a book ?
You just open the book and start reading 🤣
متابع من سلطنة عمان 😍😍😍
Que : - What if the people who directly learn from prophet are misleaded , or they not have proper knowledge..!
I am asking because companions of hazrat isa are missguided , companions of hazrat musa are missguided...
In history , there is a 10 sahabas who stands with one person and another 10 shabas stands with other person... After prophet....!
(Note : number 10 is signifies some sahabas , not 10 actual people)
Give me aayat that says that follow shabas after prophet... And also give me the surety that shabas make alway true decision...becoz if they make wrong decision then i will be on wrong path brother so tell me...
Imam al-Barbahari (rahimahullah) stated: “Know that Allah’s Messenger (Peace be upon him) said: “My ummah will divide into 73 sects, all of them will be in the Fire except for one, and that is the Jamā’ah.” It was said, “And who are they, O Allah’s Messenger?” He (Peace be upon him) responded, “That which I and my Companions are upon today. (Tirmidhi, no. 2641)
Why not put the title in arabic if it's meant for arabic speakers/readers? That way you will reach that audience
Hadith in the Quran:
12:111 In their history, there is a lesson for those who possess intelligence. This is not fabricated Hadith; this (Quran) confirms all previous scriptures, provides the details of everything, and is a beacon and mercy for those who believe.,
31:6 Among the people, there are those who uphold baseless Hadith, and thus divert others from the path of GOD without knowledge, and take it in vain. These have incurred a shameful retribution.,
45:6-7 These are GOD's revelations that we recite to you truthfully. In which Hadith other than GOD and His revelations do they believe? Woe to every sinful fabricator.
77:50 In what Hadith, after this, will they believe?
66:3 When the prophet disclosed a hadith to some of his wives, then one of them spread it, and God revealed it to him, he recognized part of it and denied part. So when he informed her, she said, "Who informed you of this?" He said, "I was informed by the Knowledgeable, the Ever-aware."
The Quran says it is complete and fully detailed:
6:112 We have permitted the enemies of every prophet - human and jinn devils - to inspire in each other fancy words, in order to deceive. Had your Lord willed, they would not have done it. You shall disregard them and their fabrications.,
6:113 This is to let the minds of those who do not believe in the Hereafter listen to such fabrications, and accept them, and thus expose their real convictions.,
6:114 "Shall I seek other than God as a judge when He has sent down to you the Book fully detailed?" Those to whom We have given the Book know it is sent down from your Lord with the truth; so do not be of those who have doubt.
6:115 The word of your Lord is complete, in truth and justice. Nothing shall abrogate His words. He is the Hearer, the Omniscient.,
6:116 If you obey the majority of people on earth, they will divert you from the path of GOD. They follow only conjecture; they only guess.,
You know that revelations means anything that is sent or revealed from Allah including the traditions - like Hadith Qudsi and other hadiths. Of course, "false hadiths" are known as "fabricated" and are not believed. Hadiths means stories, as in the verse " فلعلك باخع نفسك على اثارهم ان لم يؤمنوا بهذا الحديث اسفا"
@@Diamondraw4Real Quran clearly says that it is ‘Detailed, Clear and Complete’. What more do you need to reject Ahadith?
@@Titan-ub5op we would like for you not to cut and paste the Qur'an.
*Qur'an 6 : 89* - They are those whom We gave the Book, Al-Hukm (understanding of the religious laws), and Prophethood. But if these disbelieve therein (the Book, Al-Hukm and Prophethood), then, indeed We have entrusted it to a people (such as the Companions of Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) who are not disbelievers therein.
Allah: Warns about homosexuality
Quranists: no no homosexuality is fine
Allah: Sacrifice animal
Quranist : no no it's just metaphor for Ibrahim
Allah: I created Adam from clay
Quranist: no no it's just a story. Adam doesn't exist
Allah: promised to preserve His religion
Quranist: no no muslims follow corrupted Islam
Allah: fight the disbelievers
Quranist: no no it means hug them
Allah: when you are in dispute refer it to Allah AND His Messenger
Quranist: no no we refer it to our deity edip yuksel
Allah: send salutation on the Prophet
Quranist: oh heck no
Allah: follow the Messenger
Quranist: huh what? I couldn't hear
He is a historian not Shaikh.
He didn't claim to be one, he is simply Adnan Rashid
@Abba Abba he is actually an ustadh. none calling him a sheikh
مشہور منکر حجیت حدیث جاوید غامدی نے طریقے کار بدل لیا ہے، کہ سنت دین ہے حدیث نہیں، سنت حدیث سے نہیں لوگوں کے عمل سے آتی ہے جس میں عقائد شامل نہیں ہیں وہ صرف قرآن سے حاصل یوں گے، سنت بھی پرانے نبیوں کی رویت ہے جس کو آخری نبی نے صحیح کر کے لوگوں میں جاری کیا جو عملی تواتر سے ہمارے پاس پہنچیں ہیں۔ حدیث سے کوئی حکم ثابت نہیں ہوتا۔
Just yesterday a hadith rejector was "teaching me a lesson".... Are all hadith rejector so rude?
No, just like all sunni Muslims aren’t backwards extremists or all atheists aren’t angry god-haters. Everyone is different my friend and they have their own personality, both good or bad. So I’m sorry you got treated like that. But speaking on the INTELLECTUAL side of things, I would respectfully like you to consider this:
*11 Simple Questions for Traditional Muslims:*
*1)* Why is there not a SINGLE place in the entire Quran where a secondary scripture & divine revelation called the “Sunnah” or “Prophetic Hadith” is mentioned? Doesn’t the Quran constantly claim that it is clear & straightforward?
*2)* Why do the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” appear over and over again throughout the Quran, yet never ONCE refer to what traditional Muslims use them as? (as the inspired words & teachings of the Prophet); if there is actually a second scripture ordained by God called the Hadith, isn’t this quite deceptive and misleading?
*3)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of itself and it’s perfect guidance, lack of contradictions, and promise of its preservation, and so on, yet make NO such claim about the Hadith? Wouldn’t we expect that the Quran adds the phrase “ والسنة” (‘and the Sunnah’) in these verses where the Quran alone is mentioned?
*4)* Why does the “Sunnah” contradict the Quran in so many ways? For example, so-called “Sahih” Hadiths tell us that tiger and other animals are forbidden to eat, whereas the Quran is manifestly clear that the ONLY four prohibited foods are carrion, blood, pig’s meat, and idol-offerings. Or for example, Sahih Hadiths tell is that the Prophet will be an intercessor on Judgement Day for those in his Ummah who committed MAJOR sins, whereas the Quran clearly states that anyone who commits major sins and fails to repent will be condemned to Hell, and will have no protector, intercessor, or savior. How can these teachings be a “commentary” on the Quran (as sunni Muslims claim) when they blatantly contradict it?
*5)* Why do you say that the Sunnah (as supposedly preserved in the Hadith) is a commentary on the Quran, when you know that the Hadith is actually just a bunch of isolated sayings and doings of the Prophet and his companions, with less than 1% actually being direct commentary on the Quran? How can you claim this especially when considering the massive disagreement amongst traditional sects and scholars when it comes to Hadith-based theology, as well as numerous clear & major contradictions between the Quran and Hadith as shown above?
*6)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of the Torah and Gospel, as well as the Psalms and other scriptures of God-and call these “guidance” and “beacons of light”-while no such honorable mention is ever made of the supposed SECOND REVELATION that God allegedly sent down to the Prophet, which was the inspired Sunnah? How could God fail to prioritize mentioning the Hadith-which is supposedly REQUIRED for understanding the Quran itself-yet constantly mentions the amazing wonder & authority of the previous scriptures & revelations which we aren’t even required to follow anymore?
*7)* If we got rid of the Quran and just kept all the Hadith, don’t you think that the current traditional religion of Islam would still be perfectly intact? In other words, isn’t the Hadith alone sufficient for nearly everything you need to practice traditional Islam in its current form? What then is the need for the Quran under this framework? What other essential use does it provide that the Hadith cannot? And isn’t this why the Muslim scholars of the past admitted “the Quran is in more need of the Sunnah than the Sunnah is in need of the Quran”?
*8)* Why is there such a massive difference between the structure of the Quran and Hadith if they are both indeed co-equal legally-binding divine revelations brought down by God? For example, the Quran is preserved word-for-word, whereas the Hadith is only preserved meaning-to-meaning; the Quran is unique in style and incredibly easy to memorize & recite, whereas the Hadith is clearly human literature and was not made for easy memorization; the Quran is recited during worship, while the Hadith is not; and the list goes on. If both were equally divine revelations of God, why is this the case? Yet isn’t this exactly what we we’d expect if people FASELY attributed another work of literature as being revelation alongside the one true revelation? (Ex. like the Talmud was done to the Torah by the Jews)
*9)* If you were to give a copy of the Quran to an unbiased stranger who spoke fluent classical Arabic, and had them read the Quran for the first time, from beginning to end, and with no other source of information-would they come back to you confused and puzzled, and be asking you for the secondary scripture & co-divine revelation called the “Prophetic Sunnah & Hadith” that they were allegedly supposed to read about in the Quran?
*10)* We already know that the previous generations before us who were given scripture & guidance by Allah (SWT) went far astray and added all sorts of falsehoods and fake traditions to their religion, including the Talmud of the Jews (who also claim that it contains traditions of Moses as commentary of the Torah) and the writings of Paul & the Church, whom the Christians have given precedence over Jesus’ own words and have thereby begun to worship the Trinity and hold other false beliefs. With this in mind, shouldn’t we be wary that we TOO might also have gone astray from the pure teachings of God in the Quran? Wouldn’t it be foolish and careless of us to ignore the warnings of Allah (SWT) about the history of people of the scripture, and thus fail to consider that we might be deviating from the right path just as they did?
*11)* Finally, what WOULD the Quran actually have to say for you to accept that it is the only revelation brought down from God to the Prophet? The Quran already says COUNTLESS times that it is clear & lucid, sufficient for guidance, detailed & self-explanatory, unmatched & supreme, and perfectly preserved-so what else could the Quran then possibly say for you to finally give up and realize that it is what it claims to be?
I hope you will think about these questions carefully and with sincerity. Salam.
@@celestialknight2339 I am not a scholar so I am not equipped with the knowledge to answer these questions... Present them a proper scholar. And I think you watched the whole 1 and half hour video. And also part 2 is coming soon inshaAllah. One very simple reson is (from my very sinple understanding), Quran is contradiction free and also very concise, by rejecting hadith we would loose proper meaning of a lot of it and people would start to make their own explanation of Quran. Saying anything otherwise is equivalent to say something like "I understand Quran better than the very person it was revealed upon". I think no muslim should have that kind of audacity...
@@celestialknight2339 Also...
لِّلَّهِ مَا فِي ٱلسَّمَٰوَٰتِ وَمَا فِي ٱلۡأَرۡضِۗ وَإِن تُبۡدُواْ مَا فِيٓ أَنفُسِكُمۡ أَوۡ تُخۡفُوهُ يُحَاسِبۡكُم بِهِ ٱللَّهُۖ فَيَغۡفِرُ لِمَن يَشَآءُ وَيُعَذِّبُ مَن يَشَآءُۗ وَٱللَّهُ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَيۡءٖ قَدِيرٌ
(Dr. Mustafa Khattab)
To Allah ˹alone˺ belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. Whether you reveal what is in your hearts or conceal it, Allah will call you to account for it. He forgives whoever He wills, and punishes whoever He wills. And Allah is Most Capable of everything.
-Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah 284
Here you see, you would be clearly held accountable for even your thoughts, the things you conceal in your hearts. And this is very hard (if by any means possible by the grace of Allah to control thoughts). And if you only take Quran, you would be pretty danger due to this verse. And when sahaba pleaded that it is very hard to control thoughts...
ءَامَنَ ٱلرَّسُولُ بِمَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَيۡهِ مِن رَّبِّهِۦ وَٱلۡمُؤۡمِنُونَۚ كُلٌّ ءَامَنَ بِٱللَّهِ وَمَلَٰٓئِكَتِهِۦ وَكُتُبِهِۦ وَرُسُلِهِۦ لَا نُفَرِّقُ بَيۡنَ أَحَدٖ مِّن رُّسُلِهِۦۚ وَقَالُواْ سَمِعۡنَا وَأَطَعۡنَاۖ غُفۡرَانَكَ رَبَّنَا وَإِلَيۡكَ ٱلۡمَصِيرُ
(Dr. Mustafa Khattab)
The Messenger ˹firmly˺ believes in what has been revealed to him from his Lord, and so do the believers. They ˹all˺ believe in Allah, His angels, His Books, and His messengers. ˹They proclaim,˺ “We make no distinction between any of His messengers.” And they say, “We hear and obey. ˹We seek˺ Your forgiveness, our Lord! And to you ˹alone˺ is the final return.”
-Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah 285
So if your are a believer, according to the very next ayath you are not even allowed to plead. As a believer, you say "we hear and we obey".
But since when we are forgiven for our thoughts? It is a well established fact of Islam that we would not be held accountable for thoughts. Or are you going to say otherwise? I don't know how are you going to resolve this issue without hadith? Even if we look at the ayath after
لَا يُكَلِّفُ ٱللَّهُ نَفۡسًا إِلَّا وُسۡعَهَاۚ لَهَا مَا كَسَبَتۡ وَعَلَيۡهَا مَا ٱكۡتَسَبَتۡۗ رَبَّنَا لَا تُؤَاخِذۡنَآ إِن نَّسِينَآ أَوۡ أَخۡطَأۡنَاۚ رَبَّنَا وَلَا تَحۡمِلۡ عَلَيۡنَآ إِصۡرٗا كَمَا حَمَلۡتَهُۥ عَلَى ٱلَّذِينَ مِن قَبۡلِنَاۚ رَبَّنَا وَلَا تُحَمِّلۡنَا مَا لَا طَاقَةَ لَنَا بِهِۦۖ وَٱعۡفُ عَنَّا وَٱغۡفِرۡ لَنَا وَٱرۡحَمۡنَآۚ أَنتَ مَوۡلَىٰنَا فَٱنصُرۡنَا عَلَى ٱلۡقَوۡمِ ٱلۡكَٰفِرِينَ
(Dr. Mustafa Khattab)
Allah does not require of any soul more than what it can afford. All good will be for its own benefit, and all evil will be to its own loss. ˹The believers pray,˺ “Our Lord! Do not punish us if we forget or make a mistake. Our Lord! Do not place a burden on us like the one you placed on those before us. Our Lord! Do not burden us with what we cannot bear. Pardon us, forgive us, and have mercy on us. You are our ˹only˺ Guardian. So grant us victory over the disbelieving people.”
-Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah 286
Here only describes Allah doesn’t hold accountable a soul more than it cannot bear. No clear indication of granting general mercy on thoughts. How are you going to reconcile this whole issue without hadith?
@@celestialknight2339
Al-Miqdam ibn Ma’di reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “I have surely been given the Quran and something like it along with it. Soon the time is come when a man will recline on his couch, saying: Only follow the Quran, make lawful what you find in it as lawful and outlaw what you find in it as unlawful.”
Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 4604
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
@@celestialknight2339
Aslam al-Qibti reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Let me not find one of you reclining on his couch, when a command or prohibition of mine comes to him and he says: I do not know, we only follow what we find in the Book of Allah.”
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2663
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
Brother adnan please come to peshawar. I will arrange a meeting in our local mosque where you can give speech.
Quran alone is enough
There is Not 1 single verse in the entire Quran which tells us we need other Hadiths
And many which Condemn Hadith by name and hundreds telling us it is Only the Quran to be followed
You missed the multiple "obey the messenger" verses
@@chailouai3084 you wrote : "You missed the multiple "obey the messenger" verses"
response : does obey the messenger, i must obey you, your imams and hadith transmitters dead or alive blindly ?
yes or no ?
salam
@@ironman4093 nope biographical evaluation is done for a transmitter to be trustworthy btw if you dont believe those transmitters to be reliable then why believe the quran isnt fabricated? Cuz if you dont know lots of same transmitters also transmitted the readings(qiraat) of quran
@@chailouai3084 YOU WROTE : "btw if you dont believe those transmitters to be reliable then why believe the quran isnt fabricated?"
RESPONSE : The quran is the best hadith and the hadiths you and your imams transmit can never ever be the best
*[Chapter 39: The Groups, Az-Zumar, الزُّمَر : Verse 23]*
اللَّهُ نَزَّلَ أَحْسَنَ الْحَدِيثِ كِتَابًا مُّتَشَابِهًا مَّثَانِيَ تَقْشَعِرُّ مِنْهُ جُلُودُ الَّذِينَ يَخْشَوْنَ رَبَّهُمْ ثُمَّ تَلِينُ جُلُودُهُمْ وَقُلُوبُهُمْ إِلَىٰ ذِكْرِ اللَّهِ ذَٰلِكَ هُدَى اللَّهِ يَهْدِي بِهِ مَن يَشَاءُ وَمَن يُضْلِلِ اللَّهُ فَمَا لَهُ مِنْ هَادٍ
[39:23] “ALLAH HAS SENT DOWN أَحْسَنَ (THE BEST) الْحَدِيثِ HADĪTHI: a consistent Book wherein is reiteration. The skins shiver therefrom of those who fear their Lord; then their skins and their hearts relax at the remembrance of Allah. *That is the guidance of Allah by which He guides whom He wills. And one whom Allah leaves astray - for him there is no guide.”*
www.islamawakened.com/quran/39/23/default.htm
*[Chapter 7: The Heights, Al-A'raaf, الْأَعْرَاف : Verse 185]*
أَوَلَمْ يَنظُرُوا فِي مَلَكُوتِ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ وَمَا خَلَقَ اللَّهُ مِن شَيْءٍ وَأَنْ عَسَىٰ أَن يَكُونَ قَدِ اقْتَرَبَ أَجَلُهُمْ فَبِأَيِّ حَدِيثٍ بَعْدَهُ يُؤْمِنُونَ
[7:185] Have they not looked at the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and all that God has created? Perhaps their time is drawing near; so in which HADITH narrative after this one will they believe?
www.islamawakened.com/quran/7/185/default.htm
which hadith after this will you believe ? sahih bukhari, muslim etc ?
*[Chapter 4: The Women, An-Nisaa, النِّسَآء : Verse 87]*
اللَّهُ لَا إِلَٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ ۚ لَيَجْمَعَنَّكُمْ إِلَىٰ يَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ لَا رَيْبَ فِيهِ ۗ وَمَنْ أَصْدَقُ مِنَ اللَّهِ حَدِيثًا
Allah! there is no god but he. Surely He shall gather you together on the Day of Resurrection, *AND WHO IS MORE TRUE IN GIVING حَدِيثًا HADITH THAN ALLAH?* (4:87)
www.islamawakened.com/quran/4/87/default.htm
are you, your imams and all hadith tranmitters dead or alive more true in giving hadith than Allah ?
yes or no ?
*[Chapter 12: Joseph, Yusuf, يُوْسُف : Verse 103-111*
وَمَا أَكْثَرُ النَّاسِ وَلَوْ حَرَصْتَ بِمُؤْمِنِينَ
[12:103] *AND MOST أَكْثَرُ OF THE PEOPLE, EVEN IF YOU ARE DILIGENT, WILL NOT BELIEVE.*
وَمَا تَسْأَلُهُمْ عَلَيْهِ مِنْ أَجْرٍ إِنْ هُوَ إِلَّا ذِكْرٌ لِّلْعَالَمِينَ
[12:104] And you do not ask of them for it any payment. It is not except a reminder to the worlds.
وَكَأَيِّن مِّنْ آيَةٍ فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ يَمُرُّونَ عَلَيْهَا وَهُمْ عَنْهَا مُعْرِضُونَ
[12:105] And how many a sign within the heavens and earth do they pass over while they, therefrom, are turning away.
وَمَا يُؤْمِنُ أَكْثَرُهُم بِاللَّهِ إِلَّا وَهُم مُّشْرِكُونَ
[12:106] *AND MOST OF THEM أَكْثَرُهُم BELIEVE NOT IN ALLAH EXCEPT WHILE THEY ASSOCIATE OTHERS WITH HIM.*
أَفَأَمِنُوا أَن تَأْتِيَهُمْ غَاشِيَةٌ مِّنْ عَذَابِ اللَّهِ أَوْ تَأْتِيَهُمُ السَّاعَةُ بَغْتَةً وَهُمْ لَا يَشْعُرُونَ
[12:107] THEN DO THEY FEEL SECURE THAT THERE WILL NOT COME TO THEM AN OVERWHELMING PUNISHMENT OF ALLAH عَذَابِ اللَّهِ or that the Hour will not come upon them suddenly while they do not perceive?
قُلْ هَٰذِهِ سَبِيلِي أَدْعُو إِلَى اللَّهِ عَلَىٰ بَصِيرَةٍ أَنَا وَمَنِ اتَّبَعَنِي وَسُبْحَانَ اللَّهِ وَمَا أَنَا مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ
[12:108] Say, "This is my way; I invite to Allah with insight, I and those who follow me. And exalted is Allah ; and I am not of those who associate others with Him."
وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَا مِن قَبْلِكَ إِلَّا رِجَالًا نُّوحِي إِلَيْهِم مِّنْ أَهْلِ الْقُرَىٰ أَفَلَمْ يَسِيرُوا فِي الْأَرْضِ فَيَنظُرُوا كَيْفَ كَانَ عَاقِبَةُ الَّذِينَ مِن قَبْلِهِمْ وَلَدَارُ الْآخِرَةِ خَيْرٌ لِّلَّذِينَ اتَّقَوْا أَفَلَا تَعْقِلُونَ
[12:109] And We sent not before you except men to whom We revealed from among the people of cities. SO HAVE THEY NOT TRAVELED THROUGH THE EARTH AND OBSERVED HOW WAS THE END OF THOSE BEFORE THEM? And the home of the Hereafter is best for those who fear Allah; THEN WILL YOU NOT REASON أَفَلَا تَعْقِلُونَ ?
حَتَّىٰ إِذَا اسْتَيْأَسَ الرُّسُلُ وَظَنُّوا أَنَّهُمْ قَدْ كُذِبُوا جَاءَهُمْ نَصْرُنَا فَنُجِّيَ مَن نَّشَاءُ وَلَا يُرَدُّ بَأْسُنَا عَنِ الْقَوْمِ الْمُجْرِمِينَ
[12:110] [They continued] until, when the messengers despaired and were certain that they had been denied, THERE CAME TO THEM OUR VICTORY, AND WHOEVER WE WILLED WAS SAVED. AND OUR PUNISHMENT CANNOT BE REPELLED FROM THE PEOPLE WHO ARE CRIMINALS.
لَقَدْ كَانَ فِي قَصَصِهِمْ عِبْرَةٌ لِّأُولِي الْأَلْبَابِ مَا كَانَ حَدِيثًا يُفْتَرَىٰ وَلَٰكِن تَصْدِيقَ الَّذِي بَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ وَتَفْصِيلَ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَهُدًى وَرَحْمَةً لِّقَوْمٍ يُؤْمِنُونَ
[12:111] In their stories is a lesson for those who possess intelligence. *IT IS NOT A NARRATION (HADITH حَدِيثًا) THAT HAS BEEN INVENTED يُفْتَرَىٰ,* but an authentication of what is between his hands and *A DETAILING OF ALL THINGS وَتَفْصِيلَ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ, AND A GUIDANCE AND A MERCY FOR A PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE.*
www.islamawakened.com/quran/12/103/default.htm
*IT IS NOT A NARRATION (HADITH حَدِيثًا) THAT HAS BEEN INVENTED يُفْتَرَىٰ,*
enjoy
case closed
salam
@@ironman4093 nah your comment even ignoring your misinterpretation of the verses is circular reasoning fallacy en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning#:~:text=Circular%20reasoning%20(Latin%3A%20circulus%20in,the%20conclusion%20must%20be%20true.
Salam ustadh
33:50
46:50
1:10:45
I need to learn my history I'm so far behind
@Adnan Rashid I have lot of respect for the work you are doing brother Adnan,But I disagree with you that javed ghamidi is a Hadith rejector,because he is Not!in fact ghamidi sahb is a great thinker and intellectual of Islam...secondly I would love to discuss with you about the authenticity of Hadith literature one day inshaAllah,possibly at SC!because I cannot believe that how anyone with the thinking mind can Defend Every Narration written in KUTB E SITTA...one day InshaAllah.....Asalam wa alaikum
*11 Simple Questions for Traditional Muslims:*
*1)* Why is there not a SINGLE place in the entire Quran where a secondary scripture & divine revelation called the “Sunnah” or “Prophetic Hadith” is mentioned? Doesn’t the Quran constantly claim that it is clear & straightforward?
*2)* Why do the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” appear over and over again throughout the Quran, yet never ONCE refer to what traditional Muslims use them as? (as the inspired words & teachings of the Prophet); if there is actually a second scripture ordained by God called the Hadith, isn’t this quite deceptive and misleading?
*3)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of itself and it’s perfect guidance, lack of contradictions, and promise of its preservation, and so on, yet make NO such claim about the Hadith? Wouldn’t we expect that the Quran adds the phrase “ والسنة” (‘and the Sunnah’) in these verses where the Quran alone is mentioned?
*4)* Why does the “Sunnah” contradict the Quran in so many ways? For example, so-called “Sahih” Hadiths tell us that tiger and other animals are forbidden to eat, whereas the Quran is manifestly clear that the ONLY four prohibited foods are carrion, blood, pig’s meat, and idol-offerings. Or for example, Sahih Hadiths tell is that the Prophet will be an intercessor on Judgement Day for those in his Ummah who committed MAJOR sins, whereas the Quran clearly states that anyone who commits major sins and fails to repent will be condemned to Hell, and will have no protector, intercessor, or savior. How can these teachings be a “commentary” on the Quran (as sunni Muslims claim) when they blatantly contradict it?
*5)* Why do you say that the Sunnah (as supposedly preserved in the Hadith) is a commentary on the Quran, when you know that the Hadith is actually just a bunch of isolated sayings and doings of the Prophet and his companions, with less than 1% actually being direct commentary on the Quran? How can you claim this especially when considering the massive disagreement amongst traditional sects and scholars when it comes to Hadith-based theology, as well as numerous clear & major contradictions between the Quran and Hadith as shown above?
*6)* Why does the Quran constantly make mention of the Torah and Gospel, as well as the Psalms and other scriptures of God-and call these “guidance” and “beacons of light”-while no such honorable mention is ever made of the supposed SECOND REVELATION that God allegedly sent down to the Prophet, which was the inspired Sunnah? How could God fail to prioritize mentioning the Hadith-which is supposedly REQUIRED for understanding the Quran itself-yet constantly mentions the amazing wonder & authority of the previous scriptures & revelations which we aren’t even required to follow anymore?
*7)* If we got rid of the Quran and just kept all the Hadith, don’t you think that the current traditional religion of Islam would still be perfectly intact? In other words, isn’t the Hadith alone sufficient for nearly everything you need to practice traditional Islam in its current form? What then is the need for the Quran under this framework? What other essential use does it provide that the Hadith cannot? And isn’t this why the Muslim scholars of the past admitted “the Quran is in more need of the Sunnah than the Sunnah is in need of the Quran”?
*8)* Why is there such a massive difference between the structure of the Quran and Hadith if they are both indeed co-equal legally-binding divine revelations brought down by God? For example, the Quran is preserved word-for-word, whereas the Hadith is only preserved meaning-to-meaning; the Quran is unique in style and incredibly easy to memorize & recite, whereas the Hadith is clearly human literature and was not made for easy memorization; the Quran is recited during worship, while the Hadith is not; and the list goes on. If both were equally divine revelations of God, why is this the case? Yet isn’t this exactly what we we’d expect if people FASELY attributed another work of literature as being revelation alongside the one true revelation? (Ex. like the Talmud was done to the Torah by the Jews)
*9)* If you were to give a copy of the Quran to an unbiased stranger who spoke fluent classical Arabic, and had them read the Quran for the first time, from beginning to end, and with no other source of information-would they come back to you confused and puzzled, and be asking you for the secondary scripture & co-divine revelation called the “Prophetic Sunnah & Hadith” that they were allegedly supposed to read about in the Quran?
*10)* We already know that the previous generations before us who were given scripture & guidance by Allah (SWT) went far astray and added all sorts of falsehoods and fake traditions to their religion, including the Talmud of the Jews (who also claim that it contains traditions of Moses as commentary of the Torah) and the writings of Paul & the Church, whom the Christians have given precedence over Jesus’ own words and have thereby begun to worship the Trinity and hold other false beliefs. With this in mind, shouldn’t we be wary that we TOO might also have gone astray from the pure teachings of God in the Quran? Wouldn’t it be foolish and careless of us to ignore the warnings of Allah (SWT) about the history of people of the scripture, and thus fail to consider that we might be deviating from the right path just as they once did?
*11)* Finally, what WOULD the Quran actually have to say for you to accept that it is the only revelation brought down from God to the Prophet? The Quran already says COUNTLESS times that it is clear & lucid, sufficient for guidance, detailed & self-explanatory, unmatched & supreme, and perfectly preserved-so what else could the Quran then possibly say for you to finally give up and realize that it is what it claims to be?
I hope you will think about these questions sincerely. Salam.
its sad you write so much but don't know anythign and repeat nonsense, Qur'an does mention revelation with it. hadth rejectors are the brutal ones like shi'as. t- mud was written from bayblonian captivity, hadiths were written before but compiled later. hadith is needed to pray etc.
also you are wrong as Qur'an mentions revelation and explanations with Qur'an so its part of the message and Qur'an says these will be preserved by Sahabas Radiyallahu anhum. Read Quran 16: 64 and Qur'an 6 : 89 as an example!
Wow I actually didn't read past the first point in this wall of text and I am a complete ignorant when it comes to Islam, but to show you the weak argumentation that you have presented, firstly the phrases you demand like where is it written 'sunnah' doesn't need to be addressed. Allah is not bound by your demands. The religion is clear. Obey Allah and obey the messenger saw i.e follow Quran and Sunnah as Rasul saw is the usva e hasanah.
@@GhulamMustafa11111 You’re missing the point. It’s not that God had to use those specific words, but that what we as simple-minded human beings would EXPECT the Quran-since it frequently claims to be “clear”, “lucid”, and “straightforward”-was to thus clearly tell us about the TWO distinct divine revelations that God has sent down to the Prophet, and not CONSTANTLY glorify the reliability & authority of the Quran alone, while keeping totally silent about any so-called “prophetic Hadith/Sunnah” that we allegedly need for life guidance and understanding of the Quran itself (all of which is directly contradicted by the Quran, I should add). Yet the common prooftexts that are appealed to are far too vague (and unfalsifiable, in fact, just like the Christians have done in desperately trying to prove that Jesus is God from the Bible), and it starts to become manifestly clear to the open mind that either the Hadith is NOT a co-equal divine revelation brought down by God as traditional Muslims allege, and that people have made things up over time, just like the Jews before us did with the Talmud, or as the Christians did when they slowly paganized and distorted their theology beyond recognition-OR, that God Almighty is deceptive and misleading for commanding us to follow an entire scripture & revelation on vague, flimsy grounds (Astaghfirullah; which is impossible).
So when we see the words “Hadith” and “Sunnah” being used over and over again in the Quran, yet never ONCE referring to what traditional Muslims use them as (namely as their second scripture/co-equal revelation & divine law besides the Quran)-and we in fact see those very same words being curiously applied to phrases like “The Sunnah of GOD” and the Quran being the “SUFFICIENT & BEST HADITH”-then either God Almighty is dropping us incredibly blatant hints about the future corruption that is to take place via the ‘Hadith/Sunnah’, or that human beings who incorporated these same words elsewhere were attempting to TAUNT God Almighty by flipping His own words against Him and thus promoting blatant misguiding & contradictory falsehood. Either way, no one can deny that there is a clear incongruity & disconnection between the Quran and traditional Islam-and that is what I am most focusing upon.
Moreover, what you say is obviously wrong-the Quran is NOT clear in teaching about the “Hadith & Sunnah” by merely telling us to “obey the messenger”, because if so then you wouldn’t have literally ever sect & faction of Islam reading different books of Hadith. Every major denomination of Islam accepts the Quran wholeheartedly, but differs primarily on their Hadith books/Hadith methodologies, which only then in turn affects how they interpret the Quran. So please, don’t downplay these issues and ignore massive Hadith-based division and confusion that we find between virtually every sect and their interpretation of what it means to “obey the messenger” (even though they actually follow Hadith because of history & tradition, rather than reading Quran verses like this).
Additionally, the phrase “obey the MESSENGER” simply means obey the one who delivers the MESSAGE (risālah), and that message is unequivocally the Quran. And it wouldn’t have been enough to just say “obey God” since that is too vague and brings no attention to the specific revelation being spread & preached by the messenger (ex. someone can say “Alright then I will follow whatever I think God has revealed to me inside”), while on the other hand it is also not sufficient to simply say “obey the messenger” since that completely neglects God from the picture, which is the very foundation & pinnacle of following the message itself.
So notice how the Quran didn’t say “obey Muhammad” or even “obey the prophet” but rather links it directly back to the MESSAGE itself (the Quran) by saying “obey the MESSENGER” (the message-bearer/deliverer; rasūl). Also think about it-Quran 4:80 tells us that whoever obeys the messenger has already obeyed God. We are also told that the Sunnah itself IS a divine revelation of God. Therefore, putting these together, the phrase “obey God” in the Quran can also be argued to mean “obey the Quran AND the Sunnah” and thus the next phrase “and obey the messenger” is left hanging, and one wonders what it could mean?...So you see? Even your own interpretation has various problems with it, not least of which is the fact that the Hadith/Sunnah is simply _NOT. ONCE. EXPLICITLY. SPOKEN. OF. IN. THE. ENTIRETY. OF THE QURAN._ If you were sincere, that should ring some serious alarms and get you to think.
Finally, I encourage you to read the rest of my points above; they truly get at the heart of this important issue. So I hope you will take heed and contemplate sincerely, and not let your emotions and pre-convinced biases taint your judgement on the clear reality that we find in the Quran against any secondary co-equal revelation existing besides it. It’s a hard pill to swallow, but what we should be after is the Truth and not mere comfort. Salam.
@@celestialknight2339 you've actually just made my point for me.
Obey the messenger is "LEFT HANGING" as you put it. Which ofcourse means your narrative doesn't fit.
So it really means what it says, obey the messenger by following what ge says does etc i.e the sunnah.
for christians:
If Creator made us pairs a sign He's 1 & Perfect, why He needs to become 3?
Follow Jesus, David, Musa, Ibrahim etc. who taught Monotheism & law of Islam!
Vs. farisi paul contradicting w/ divine sonship pretrinity, & lawless guilt!
Must God degrade into 2 to forgive or 3 to guide? or be a man who bows to God? or an Angel who bows to Man? When being 1 shows perfection! Who is the comforter to last forever in John 14 :16? (Quran 33:40)!
1) Monotheistic salvation vs. "Divine" son-ship.
No new God forms in a womb in Job 25 :4 or at all in isiah 43 defeats John 1!
(John prologue is suspect of being an addition due to writing style)
vs. Paul - "The 1st one to declare Jesus the Son of God: Acts 9:20: "And straightway he [Paul] preached Christ in synagogues, he is the Son of God." Not of Jesus but of Paul.
Paul made the unforgivable - breaking the greatest command - salvation.
(ultimate hypocrisy)
Deuteronomy 6:4 &
Mark 12:29 Jesus replied, "The most important commandment: 'Listen! LORD our God is the 1 and only LORD.
Good slave/Son-ship is figurative : Dawud vs Jesus
Psalms 2:7 : Lord said unto me [David]: 'Thou art my son; this day have I begotten thee."
Luke 3 :22 - Holy Spirit descended upon him in bodily form like a dove. A voice came from heaven, “You are my beloved son, with you I am well pleased.”[b]
*B. - Luke 3 :22 (NRSV) Other ancient texts say : You are my Son, today I have begotten you.*
So Bible's footnotes shows Jesus became a figurative son at baptism as an adult like David in original text...
Proving Islam's claim that bible's changed not only internally true but that Injil taught Islam first!
This also shows Holy spirit is present & not the comforter.
Figurative son-ship of Adam in bible, Jesus is human like him!
Luke 3 :38 - son of Enos, son of Seth, son of Adam, "son of God."
*Quran 3 : 59 - Verily, the likeness of 'Îsa (Jesus) before Allah is the likeness of Adam. He created him from dust, then (He) said to him: "Be!" - and he was.*
2) Law & Righteousness
Deuteronomy 4 :2 - You must neither add anything to what I command you nor take away anything from it, but keep the commandments...
Psalms 119 (poem on keeping law) - 4- You have laid down precepts to be fully obeyed.
James 2 : 17 - faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead.
Mathew 5 : 17 - Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; ... but to fulfill.
John 14:15 - “If you love me, keep my commandments...
vs. Paul: romans 10 :4 - For Christ is the end of the law...
What did Jesus mean by I won't leave you orphaned in john 14 :18?
*John 14 : 23 - “Those who love me will keep my word, my Father will love them, & we will come to them* & make our home with them... 26 - the Advocate (Paraclete/Ahmad), Holy Spirit, *whom the Father will send in my name,* will teach you all, & remind you all that I have said to you. *(Matches Quran 61 :6)*
Follow laws to not be an orphan & Jesus will be with you until a Prophet comes.
It's not the holy spirit - present at baptism.
john 16 : 7 - ... for if I do not go away, the Advocate will not come to you; ...
John 1 : 20 - ...“I am not the Messiah (Jesus).” 21 ... “Are you the prophet [(like Moses - Deuteronomy 18 :18) a.k.a. Muhammad peace & blessings on him]?” He answered, “No.”
3) Mercy vs. Original sin & forgiveness through cruci-fiction!
Deuteronomy 24 :16 - `Fathers are not put to death for sons, & sons are not put to death for fathers - each for his own sin...
(Repeated in Ezekiel 18 : 20 which adds: righteousness of the righteous is on him, & wickedness of the wicked is on him.)
Matthew 19:14 - "Children come to me, & do not forbid them, for of such is the kingdom of heaven"
vs. Hebrew 9 : 22 - ... without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.
28 - Christ, once having been offered to bear the sins of many, ... to salvation!
God is above being a man (Job 25 :4) & doesn't need a "son-sacrifice" for mercy.
*Matthew 12:7: "But if ye had known what this means, I will have mercy, & not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless."* (also Mathew 9 :13)
Mathew 5:7 - Blessed are the merciful, for they will receive mercy.
Hosea 6 : 6 - "For I desired mercy & not sacrifice, ...
Isiah 1 : 18 - “Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow;...
19. If you are willing & obedient,...
(see luke 19 too)
*Quran 39 : 53 -Say: "O 'Ibadi (My slaves) who have transgressed against themselves (by committing evil deeds and sins)! Despair not of the Mercy of Allah: verily, Allah forgives all sins. Truly He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
*
54. *"And turn in repentance and in obedience with true Faith (Islamic Monotheism) to your Lord and submit to Him (in Islam) before the torment comes upon you, (and) then you will not be helped.
*
4) Cruci-Fiction isn't historical even in bible or prophetic.
bible condemns child sacrifice :
Deutoronomy 12 : 31 - You must not do the same for the Lord your God, because every abhorrent thing that *the Lord hates they have done for their gods. They would even burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods.*
2 Chronicles 7 :14 if my people who are called by my name humble themselves, pray, seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.
Jesus is predicted to be saved from cruci-fiction,
Psalms 22: 1. My God, why hast Thou forsaken me?
16. (scripts differ)
21 Save me from the lion : -- & -- from horns of high places, Thou answered me!
(like Mathew 26 :39 Jesus prostrates as a Muslim)
Corinthians 15 : 14 - if Christ has not been raised, then our claim & your faith has been in vain.
31 : I die daily! - (Death is often exaggerated in bible)
No direct witnesses but added on later showing bible changes :
Mark 15 : 40 - There were also women looking on from a distance;...
Luke 23 : 49 - But all his acquaintances, ... stood at a distance,
Mathew 27 :55 - Many women were also there, looking on from a distance;...
vs.
John 19 : 17 - Jesus Carried the cross himself...
(removing Simon likely crucified in his place)
25 - Meanwhile, standing near the cross of Jesus were his mother...
Thesalonians 2 : 9 - The lawless one will be w/ how Satan works & use all sorts of displays of power through signs & wonders that serve the lie,
(Matches paul)
10 wickedness deceives those who are perishing, as they refused to love the truth & be saved.
(Matches Farisis)
*11 For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so they'll believe the lie.*
*Quran 4 : 157 - And because of their (boast), "We killed Messiah 'Îsa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allah," - but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but it appeared so to them, & those who differ ... follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not.*
John 17 : 3 - 5 : You are the only True God, I am who you sent, and I finished my mission ( before crucifiction and after praying for Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him - the comforter. ). Glorify me like I was before with you ( all humans were with God before in ephesians 1.)
Jesus here is fully agreeing with Islam, there is only One God, he is separate, crucifiction isn't his message but waiting praying for Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him.
5) Verdict : God is 1, Islam is true!
Paul, the lawless false Prophet of Mathew 24 :11 & 12, wanted to remove the laws, Paul degraded God's forgiveness to create a polytheistic son (Acts 9, Hebrew 9 & Romans 10) against scripture (Isaiah 43 & Mathew 12 :7) to remove laws, inspired by the devil. A Perfect God needs no partners. Paul is corrected in salvation, sin & righteousness by the lawgiver & comforter Prophet Muhammad peace & blessings on him of john 1 :21 & 16 :8!
Acts 9 :3 - he (Paul) was approaching Damascus, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him.
Luke 10 :18 - Jesus said, “I watched Satan fall from heaven like a flash of lightning.
Mathew 24 :11 & many false prophets will arise & lead many astray.
12 & because of the increase of lawlessness,
Paul lost blessings for his tribe by removing the laws.
Jeremiah 31 : 36 - If these statutes depart from before Me, An affirmation of Jehovah, Even Israelites doth cease From being a nation before Me all the days.
Cruci-fiction (attempt) led to lawlessness.
Mathew 21 :38 - tenants saw the son (Jesus), & said, ‘This heir; let us kill him & get his inheritance.’
& 43 Therefore I say kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people of fruits of the kingdom. (law)
Kingdom given to Ismael's tribe -
Genesis 17 : 20 - As to Ishmael, I have heard thee; lo, I have blessed him, made him fruitful,...; 12 (Saudi?) princes & I have made him become a great nation;
even paul went to Arabia, where Ismael dwelt 1st (Genesis 21 :21 - Paran) -
Galatians 1 : 17 - nor did I go to Jerusalem to those who were already apostles before me, but I went away at once to Arabia,...
Where the global Prophet, who paul thought he was - would come to correct him (IRONY), -
*Isaiah 42 : 6 - Jehovah, did call thee in righteousness... I give thee for a covenant of a people, And a light of nations. ... 11 The wilderness & ... villages Kedar (Ismael's son) inhabits, Sing inhabitants of Sela, From the top of mountains they cry. (Mt. Selah is Medina)*
Jesus says -
Mathew 15 : 24 - “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
*Jesus leaves his tribe for Islam on return:*
Isiah 49 :1 - ... O peoples, from afar, Jehovah from the womb hath called me, ...
*6. ... `It hath been a light thing That thou art to Me for a servant To raise up the tribes of Jacob,... I have given thee for a light of nations, - same term for Islam of Arabia in bible.*
(& more)
paul is the lawless false prophet, so covenant is given to the fruitful Ismael - the final Prophet lawgiver like Moses, to be forever as comforter is only Nabi Muhammad peace & blessings be upon him!
Solomon songs 5 :16 - He is MUHAMMADIM - (name in Hebrew)
John 16 : 8 - & when he comes, he will prove the world wrong on (original) sin, righteousness (law) & judgment (salvation):
Quran
6 : 162. *Say (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم): "Verily, my Salat (prayer), my sacrifice, my living, and my dying are for Allah, the Lord of the 'Alamin (creation).*
163. *"He has no partner. And of this I have been commanded, and I am the first of the Muslims."*
164. *Say: "Shall I seek a lord other than Allah, while He is the Lord of all things? No person earns any (sin) except against himself (only), and no bearer of burdens shall bear the burden of another. Then unto your Lord is your return, so He will tell you that wherein you have been differing."*
165. And it is He Who has made you generations coming after generations, replacing each other on the earth. And He has raised you in ranks, some above others that He may try you in that which He has bestowed on you. *Surely your Lord is Swift in retribution, and certainly He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.*
If Paul was a self appointed prophet, what makes us believe that Mohammed did not do the same?
PAUL NEVER RECIVED ANY REVELATION AND THE DISCIPLES OF JESUS pbuh DISAGREED WITH PAUL'S TEACHINGS
@@mahomedakoon8363 Mohammed was demon possessed
4) Cruci-Fiction isn't historical even in bible or prophetic.
bible condemns child sacrifice :
Deutoronomy 12 : 31 - You must not do the same for the Lord your God, because every abhorrent thing that *the Lord hates they have done for their gods. They would even burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods.*
2 Chronicles 7 :14 if my people who are called by my name humble themselves, pray, seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.
Jesus is predicted to be saved from cruci-fiction,
Psalms 22: 1. My God, why hast Thou forsaken me?
16. (scripts differ)
21 Save me from the lion : -- & -- from horns of high places, Thou answered me!
(like Mathew 26 :39 Jesus prostrates as a Muslim)
Corinthians 15 : 14 - if Christ has not been raised, then our claim & your faith has been in vain.
31 : I die daily! - (Death is often exaggerated in bible)
No direct witnesses but added on later showing bible changes :
Mark 15 : 40 - There were also women looking on from a distance;...
Luke 23 : 49 - But all his acquaintances, ... stood at a distance,
Mathew 27 :55 - Many women were also there, looking on from a distance;...
vs.
John 19 : 17 - Jesus Carried the cross himself...
(removing Simon likely crucified in his place)
25 - Meanwhile, standing near the cross of Jesus were his mother...
Thesalonians 2 : 9 - The lawless one will be w/ how Satan works & use all sorts of displays of power through signs & wonders that serve the lie,
(Matches paul)
10 wickedness deceives those who are perishing, as they refused to love the truth & be saved.
(Matches Farisis)
*11 For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so they'll believe the lie.*
*Quran 4 : 157 - And because of their (boast), "We killed Messiah 'Îsa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allah," - but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but it appeared so to them, & those who differ ... follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not.*
John 17 : 3 - 5 : You are the only True God, I am who you sent, and I finished my mission ( before crucifiction and after praying for Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him - the comforter. ). Glorify me like I was before with you ( all humans were with God before in ephesians 1.)
Jesus here is fully agreeing with Islam, there is only One God, he is separate, crucifiction isn't his message but waiting praying for Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him.
5) Verdict : God is 1, Islam is true!
Paul, the lawless false Prophet of Mathew 24 :11 & 12, wanted to remove the laws, Paul degraded God's forgiveness to create a polytheistic son (Acts 9, Hebrew 9 & Romans 10) against scripture (Isaiah 43 & Mathew 12 :7) to remove laws, inspired by the devil. A Perfect God needs no partners. Paul is corrected in salvation, sin & righteousness by the lawgiver & comforter Prophet Muhammad peace & blessings on him of john 1 :21 & 16 :8!
Acts 9 :3 - he (Paul) was approaching Damascus, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him.
Luke 10 :18 - Jesus said, “I watched Satan fall from heaven like a flash of lightning.
Mathew 24 :11 & many false prophets will arise & lead many astray.
12 & because of the increase of lawlessness,
Paul lost blessings for his tribe by removing the laws.
Jeremiah 31 : 36 - If these statutes depart from before Me, An affirmation of Jehovah, Even Israelites doth cease From being a nation before Me all the days.
Cruci-fiction (attempt) led to lawlessness.
Mathew 21 :38 - tenants saw the son (Jesus), & said, ‘This heir; let us kill him & get his inheritance.’
& 43 Therefore I say kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people of fruits of the kingdom. (law)
Kingdom given to Ismael's tribe -
Genesis 17 : 20 - As to Ishmael, I have heard thee; lo, I have blessed him, made him fruitful,...; 12 (Saudi?) princes & I have made him become a great nation;
even paul went to Arabia, where Ismael dwelt 1st (Genesis 21 :21 - Paran) -
Galatians 1 : 17 - nor did I go to Jerusalem to those who were already apostles before me, but I went away at once to Arabia,...
Where the global Prophet, who paul thought he was - would come to correct him (IRONY), -
*Isaiah 42 : 6 - Jehovah, did call thee in righteousness... I give thee for a covenant of a people, And a light of nations. ... 11 The wilderness & ... villages Kedar (Ismael's son) inhabits, Sing inhabitants of Sela, From the top of mountains they cry. (Mt. Selah is Medina)*
Jesus says -
Mathew 15 : 24 - “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
*Jesus leaves his tribe for Islam on return:*
Isiah 49 :1 - ... O peoples, from afar, Jehovah from the womb hath called me, ...
*6. ... `It hath been a light thing That thou art to Me for a servant To raise up the tribes of Jacob,... I have given thee for a light of nations, - same term for Islam of Arabia in bible.*
(& more)
paul is the lawless false prophet, so covenant is given to the fruitful Ismael - the final Prophet lawgiver like Moses, to be forever as comforter is only Nabi Muhammad peace & blessings be upon him!
Solomon songs 5 :16 - He is MUHAMMADIM - (name in Hebrew)
John 16 : 8 - & when he comes, he will prove the world wrong on (original) sin, righteousness (law) & judgment (salvation):
Quran
6 : 162. *Say (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم): "Verily, my Salat (prayer), my sacrifice, my living, and my dying are for Allah, the Lord of the 'Alamin (creation).*
163. *"He has no partner. And of this I have been commanded, and I am the first of the Muslims."*
164. *Say: "Shall I seek a lord other than Allah, while He is the Lord of all things? No person earns any (sin) except against himself (only), and no bearer of burdens shall bear the burden of another. Then unto your Lord is your return, so He will tell you that wherein you have been differing."*
165. And it is He Who has made you generations coming after generations, replacing each other on the earth. And He has raised you in ranks, some above others that He may try you in that which He has bestowed on you. *Surely your Lord is Swift in retribution, and certainly He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.*
To claim that Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him is a self appointed prophet, you have to prove it. Let's take an example. In Islam, we believe that angel Gabriel, came in the cave of Hira and revealed the first revelation to prophet Muhammad pbuh. Now there are only 4 possibilities of what happened that night. 1. Prophet Muhammad pbuh is telling the truth and angel Gabriel did infact come to him. 2. He is lying and made that whole event up, none of it happened. 3. He went mad/crazy or whatever you want to call it. 4. He was tricked by the devil.
Regarding No.4, Does satan want people to worship Idols or the God of Abraham and Moses pbut. He wants people to worship idols. So how does it make sense that he tricks Prophet Muhammad pbuh to call the idol worshippers of Arabia into believing in prophets and 1 god. In the Quran, the satan is cursed, he is called an enemy to man kind, the most hated. Before we start the Quran we seek refuge in God against the satan. According to Matthew 12:25-26, It couldnt be the satan. One of the 5 pillars (most compulsary part) in Islam is zakkah. Giving 2.5% of your saving each year to charity. Why would satan want that. Islam is the only religion apart from Christianity to accept JESUS pbuh as a messiah and prophet. Why would satan want that? Logically it couldn't be the satan decieving prophet Muhammad pbuh.
Regarding No.2, After this event took place, prophet Muhammad pbuh was terrified of what he had seen, so he says he ran back home to his wife and asked her to cover him. For an arab in the 6th century to admit this would be one of the most humiliating things to say. If he was lying he wouldn't say he ran back to his wife. When Prophet Muhammad pbuh first gave public call to Islam. He stood on a hill in Makkah. He began shouting morning disaster. Morning Disaster. The people of Quraysh (idol worshippers) came out and asked him what happened. He asked them if I told you there was an army behind this hill ready to attack you, will you believe me. They said yes, we call you al amin (the truthful one), we have never heard you ever lie for 40 years. When the people of Quraysh would go places, they would ask Muhammad pbuh to look after their valuables because he was the most trustworthy person. Prior to him receiving prophethood. The kaaba was damaged and needed repair, 4 tribes were arguing about who should repair it, they asked him to judge because of his truthful character and said they will accept whatever judgement he gave. Not even the Quraysh accused him of lying when he claimed he was a prophet, they knew he's character better than anyone today. The quran mentions this in 6:33 "They dont call you untruthful yet they reject the verses of Allah". Plus he had no motive to lie. If we think about it. Why would someone lie? Money, fame, power. He was already married to the richest business woman in the whole of Arabia. Fame and Power he had since he was the grandson of the leader of the most powerful tribe in the whole of Arabia. He's uncle was custodian of the Kaaba, the highest honour one can have. In fact after he recieved prophethood he witnessed boycotts, he's loved ones being tortured, killed. He and his followers were persecuted. The leaders of Quraysh went to him and told him stop preaching Islam, we will give you whatever your heart desires. He said o Uncle, if you put the sun in my right and moon in my left hand, I will still not give up the call of Islam. So we established that he wasnt influenced by the devil and he wasnt lying.
The Quraysh accused him of going mad until they heard the Quran. The words he recited were so powerful they knew no madman could do such a thing. One day he recited the quran and fell to sujood. Everyone witnessing did the same due to powerful verses. Immediately after they were filled with regret and embarrassment. The Quran was so powerful, Umar RA a man who hated Islam found out that Hamza RA had hit his uncle in public and warned his uncle not to hit the prophet pbuh as he too had accepted Islam. So Umar became filled with rage and left with his sword to go kill the prophet. On the way a man who had secretly accepted Islam, but was afraid of publicly admitting since people like Abu Jahl and Umar would torture the muslims. The man when he found out Umars intention, he told umar that his own sister and brother in law had converted. He rushed over to their house and began to beat them, when he saw his sister bleeding, he felt bad and said show me what you were reading before I came in. They said he had to perform abulution before he could read. When he read the Quran he broke into tears because he knew this was not the work of man, it was divine revelation. When Quraysh heard the Quran, they said this was sorcery, magic. The Quran challenged them, produce a chapter like this. None has nor will they ever be able to.
This is because the Quran is a linguist, historic, scientific miracle.
@@noahwamalwa4385 Who do christians worship. The bible answers
2 Corinthians 4:4
New Living Translation
4 Satan, who is the GOD of this world, has blinded the minds of those who don’t believe
The christian god himself was deceived by satan. he had to fast to save him from satan. he even felt hungry, what a weakling
Matthew 4:1-11
New International Version
4 Then jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness to be TEMPTED[a](B) by the DEVIL.(C) 2 After fasting forty days and forty nights,(D) he was hungry.
Hazrat Umar (Ra) said Quran is enough for us in the life of Prophet Muhammad (saw) so what ? Is that saying he was also wrong? And didn't believe in Hadith??
How do you know he said that if you don't accept hadiths ?
@@Mimi-Maa18 Narrated Ubaidullah bin Abdullah: Ibn 'Abbas said, "When the ailment of the Holy Prophet became worse, he said, 'Bring for me paper and I will write for you a statement after which you will not go astray.' But Umar said, 'The Holy Prophet is seriously ill, and we have got Allah's Book with us and that is sufficient for us.' But the companions of the Holy Prophet differed about this and there was a hue and cry. On that the Prophet said to them, 'Go away (and leave me alone). It is not right that you should quarrel in front of me." Ibn 'Abbas came out saying, "It was most unfortunate (a great disaster) that Allah's Apostle was prevented from writing that statement for them because of their disagreement and noise. (Sahih Bukhari - Book of Knowledge)
@@callie_playzuwu5068 I said how do you know he said that if you don't accept hadiths ?
@@Mimi-Maa18 your question makes no sense
@@callie_playzuwu5068 no your argument makes no sense. You are using a hadith to prove that we shouldn't believe in hadiths. Don't you see the contradiction?
Is this an old lecture?
Yeah, he’s lost some weight since then. I think it re upload w Arabic subtitles
In sahih bukhari there are hadith saying that the Prophet s.a.w. was contemplating throwing himself from the top of a mountain when he was depressed due to delay in revelation. Should we believe such hadith which go against the personality of prophet and which contradicts the Quranic verses about the sinful act of killing onself. There are many such hadith. Why dont the scholars come put openly and discard them
You shouldn't cuz Bukhari himself investigated the authenticity of that and stated that it's not authentic
@@chailouai3084 Then why did he include this hadith in the first place. What purpose does it serve other than creating confusion.
@@indianrational6887 dude it's not included lol he said in his book that it's not reliable, this way poeple would know rather than get confused when they hear and not get tricked into believing false info
@@chailouai3084 see below
Sahih al-Bukhari 6982
Narrated `Aisha:
The commencement of the Divine Inspiration to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) was in the form of good righteous (true) dreams in his sleep. He never had a dream but that it came true like bright day light. He used to go in seclusion (the cave of) Hira where he used to worship(Allah Alone) continuously for many (days) nights. He used to take with him the journey food for that (stay) and then come back to (his wife) Khadija to take his food like-wise again for another period to stay, till suddenly the Truth descended upon him while he was in the cave of Hira. The angel came to him in it and asked him to read. The Prophet (ﷺ) replied, "I do not know how to read." (The Prophet (ﷺ) added), "The angel caught me (forcefully) and pressed me so hard that I could not bear it anymore. He then released me and again asked me to read, and I replied, "I do not know how to read," whereupon he caught me again and pressed me a second time till I could not bear it anymore. He then released me and asked me again to read, but again I replied, "I do not know how to read (or, what shall I read?)." Thereupon he caught me for the third time and pressed me and then released me and said, "Read: In the Name of your Lord, Who has created (all that exists). Has created man from a clot. Read and Your Lord is Most Generous...up to..... ..that which he knew not." (96.15) Then Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) returned with the Inspiration, his neck muscles twitching with terror till he entered upon Khadija and said, "Cover me! Cover me!" They covered him till his fear was over and then he said, "O Khadija, what is wrong with me?" Then he told her everything that had happened and said, 'I fear that something may happen to me." Khadija said, 'Never! But have the glad tidings, for by Allah, Allah will never disgrace you as you keep good reactions with your Kith and kin, speak the truth, help the poor and the destitute, serve your guest generously and assist the deserving, calamityafflicted ones." Khadija then accompanied him to (her cousin) Waraqa bin Naufal bin Asad bin `Abdul `Uzza bin Qusai. Waraqa was the son of her paternal uncle, i.e., her father's brother, who during the Pre-Islamic Period became a Christian and used to write the Arabic writing and used to write of the Gospels in Arabic as much as Allah wished him to write. He was an old man and had lost his eyesight. Khadija said to him, "O my cousin! Listen to the story of your nephew." Waraqa asked, "O my nephew! What have you seen?" The Prophet (ﷺ) described whatever he had seen. Waraqa said, "This is the same Namus (i.e., Gabriel, the Angel who keeps the secrets) whom Allah had sent to Moses. I wish I were young and could live up to the time when your people would turn you out." Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) asked, "Will they turn me out?" Waraqa replied in the affirmative and said: "Never did a man come with something similar to what you have brought but was treated with hostility. If I should remain alive till the day when you will be turned out then I would support you strongly." But after a few days Waraqa died and the Divine Inspiration was also paused for a while and the Prophet (ﷺ) became so sad as we have heard that he intended several times to throw himself from the tops of high mountains and every time he went up the top of a mountain in order to throw himself down, Gabriel would appear before him and say, "O Muhammad! You are indeed Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) in truth" whereupon his heart would become quiet and he would calm down and would return home. And whenever the period of the coming of the inspiration used to become long, he would do as before, but when he used to reach the top of a mountain, Gabriel would appear before him and say to him what he had said before. (Ibn `Abbas said regarding the meaning of: 'He it is that Cleaves the daybreak (from the darkness)' (6.96) that Al-Asbah. means the light of the sun during the day and the light of the moon at night).
He didn't kill himself.
And also, neither you nor I know how it feels to receive revelation. The prophet Muhammad salalahu aleyhi wa salam is the most humble of humans than others. Imagine being told he is messenger of Allah, compared to when Musa was told or Ibrahim. May the peace of allah be upon them, I love them all. They are my brothers and role models, and heros
The whole authentication process of hadith is based on the "sound chain of narrration" theory, in which the character of the narrators was evaluated.
In Q9:101. (And among the arabs around you, some are hypocrites, and so are some among the people of Al-Madinah who persist in hypocrisy; YOU KNOW THEM NOT, We know them. We shall punish them twice, and thereafter they shall be brought back to a great (horrible) torment.)
Allah informs us that even the prophet was not aware of the character of the people around him then what credibility the later scholars who are analyzing the character of the people long dead are left with ?
For all elaborate words you can muster, your ignorance really shows when you challenge the concept of transmission of knowledge through testimony. Without it humanity itself wouldn't be where it is, let alone Islam.
Please, if you really want people to engage in idle argumentation with your points, work on making stronger ones.
@@GhulamMustafa11111 It would be insane to boast about the ignorance transmitted through testimony. Do you know that Bukhari did not consider several of the narrators of Muslim to be trustworthy and Muslim did not take any testimony from several of the narrators considered reliable by Bukhari ?
Furthermore, the hadiths are full of contradictions, slandering of prophets wives, factual error, lies about the prophets etc. And interestingly not a single hadith collection exists which are considered authentic by at least two collectors.
Now can you exaplain to me how hadith collectors could evaluate the character of the people (dead long before the collectors were even born) whose real character was not even known to the prophet according to the Quran 9:101 ?
This question is also to people like Adnan Rashid who are spreading hadith idolatory.
@@adilrasheedonline you aren't very smart, firstly, Qur'an says to follow sahabas and hadiths, 2nd Qur'an says Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him will explain in Quran 16 :64. Sahabas said weere later told who they were or they died. thats why there are surahs like surah 63 about the hypocrites!
@@adilrasheedonline you don't have evdence for your claim many scholars have agreed on bukari. you are in the wrong and shouldnt waste time.
Allah: Warns about homosexuality
Quranists: no no homosexuality is fine
Allah: Sacrifice animal
Quranist : no no it's just metaphor for Ibrahim
Allah: I created Adam from clay
Quranist: no no it's just a story. Adam doesn't exist
Allah: promised to preserve His religion
Quranist: no no muslims follow corrupted Islam
Allah: fight the disbelievers
Quranist: no no it means hug them
Allah: when you are in dispute refer it to Allah AND His Messenger
Quranist: no no we refer it to our deity edip yuksel
Allah: send salutation on the Prophet
Quranist: oh heck no
Allah: follow the Messenger
Quranist: huh what? I couldn't hear
Oh yes He did say He came to die for the sin of the world.
It was also prophesied in the old testament. Isaiah 53, written 800 years before the fact:
Isa 53:1 Who has believed our message and to whom has the arm of the LORD been revealed?
Isa 53:2 He grew up before him like a tender shoot, and like a root out of dry ground. He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.
Isa 53:3 He was despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows, and familiar with suffering. Like one from whom men hide their faces he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
Isa 53:4 Surely he took up our infirmities and carried our sorrows, yet we considered him stricken by God, smitten by him, and afflicted.
Isa 53:5 But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed.
Isa 53:6 We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all.
Isa 53:7 He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
Isa 53:8 By oppression and judgment he was taken away. And who can speak of his descendants? For he was cut off from the land of the living; for the transgression of my people he was stricken.
Isa 53:9 He was assigned a grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death, though he had done no violence, nor was any deceit in his mouth.
Isa 53:10 Yet it was the LORD'S will to crush him and cause him to suffer, and though the LORD makes his life a guilt offering, he will see his offspring and prolong his days, and the will of the LORD will prosper in his hand.
Isa 53:11 After the suffering of his soul, he will see the light of life and be satisfied; by his knowledge my righteous servant will justify many, and he will bear their iniquities.
Isa 53:12 Therefore I will give him a portion among the great, and he will divide the spoils with the strong, because he poured out his life unto death, and was numbered with the transgressors. For he bore the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.
Jesus said Joh 3:16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
And Mar 10:45 For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many."
That's just 2 off the top of my head.
The scriptures have been accurately preserved. The dead sea scrolls and the Greek Septuagint testify to the accurate preservation of the old testament and the writings if the early church fathers and over 5000 greek and 20000 latin manuscripts testify that we have the same new testament, which was complete 500 years before Mohammed came along and trashed the whole thing and came up with a new religion that contradicts the old testament.
for christians:
If Creator made us pairs a sign He's 1 & Perfect, why He needs to become 3?
Follow Jesus, David, Musa, Ibrahim etc. who taught Monotheism & law of Islam!
Vs. farisi paul contradicting w/ divine sonship pretrinity, & lawless guilt!
Must God degrade into 2 to forgive or 3 to guide? or be a man who bows to God? or an Angel who bows to Man? When being 1 shows perfection! Who is the comforter to last forever in John 14 :16? (Quran 33:40)!
1) Monotheistic salvation vs. "Divine" son-ship.
No new God forms in a womb in Job 25 :4 or at all in isiah 43 defeats John 1!
(John prologue is suspect of being an addition due to writing style)
vs. Paul - "The 1st one to declare Jesus the Son of God: Acts 9:20: "And straightway he [Paul] preached Christ in synagogues, he is the Son of God." Not of Jesus but of Paul.
Paul made the unforgivable - breaking the greatest command - salvation.
(ultimate hypocrisy)
Deuteronomy 6:4 &
Mark 12:29 Jesus replied, "The most important commandment: 'Listen! LORD our God is the 1 and only LORD.
Good slave/Son-ship is figurative : Dawud vs Jesus
Psalms 2:7 : Lord said unto me [David]: 'Thou art my son; this day have I begotten thee."
Luke 3 :22 - Holy Spirit descended upon him in bodily form like a dove. A voice came from heaven, “You are my beloved son, with you I am well pleased.”[b]
*B. - Luke 3 :22 (NRSV) Other ancient texts say : You are my Son, today I have begotten you.*
So Bible's footnotes shows Jesus became a figurative son at baptism as an adult like David in original text...
Proving Islam's claim that bible's changed not only internally true but that Injil taught Islam first!
This also shows Holy spirit is present & not the comforter.
Figurative son-ship of Adam in bible, Jesus is human like him!
Luke 3 :38 - son of Enos, son of Seth, son of Adam, "son of God."
*Quran 3 : 59 - Verily, the likeness of 'Îsa (Jesus) before Allah is the likeness of Adam. He created him from dust, then (He) said to him: "Be!" - and he was.*
2) Law & Righteousness
Deuteronomy 4 :2 - You must neither add anything to what I command you nor take away anything from it, but keep the commandments...
Psalms 119 (poem on keeping law) - 4- You have laid down precepts to be fully obeyed.
James 2 : 17 - faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead.
Mathew 5 : 17 - Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; ... but to fulfill.
John 14:15 - “If you love me, keep my commandments...
vs. Paul: romans 10 :4 - For Christ is the end of the law...
What did Jesus mean by I won't leave you orphaned in john 14 :18?
*John 14 : 23 - “Those who love me will keep my word, my Father will love them, & we will come to them* & make our home with them... 26 - the Advocate (Paraclete/Ahmad), Holy Spirit, *whom the Father will send in my name,* will teach you all, & remind you all that I have said to you. *(Matches Quran 61 :6)*
Follow laws to not be an orphan & Jesus will be with you until a Prophet comes.
It's not the holy spirit - present at baptism.
john 16 : 7 - ... for if I do not go away, the Advocate will not come to you; ...
John 1 : 20 - ...“I am not the Messiah (Jesus).” 21 ... “Are you the prophet [(like Moses - Deuteronomy 18 :18) a.k.a. Muhammad peace & blessings on him]?” He answered, “No.”
3) Mercy vs. Original sin & forgiveness through cruci-fiction!
Deuteronomy 24 :16 - `Fathers are not put to death for sons, & sons are not put to death for fathers - each for his own sin...
(Repeated in Ezekiel 18 : 20 which adds: righteousness of the righteous is on him, & wickedness of the wicked is on him.)
Matthew 19:14 - "Children come to me, & do not forbid them, for of such is the kingdom of heaven"
vs. Hebrew 9 : 22 - ... without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.
28 - Christ, once having been offered to bear the sins of many, ... to salvation!
God is above being a man (Job 25 :4) & doesn't need a "son-sacrifice" for mercy.
*Matthew 12:7: "But if ye had known what this means, I will have mercy, & not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless."* (also Mathew 9 :13)
Mathew 5:7 - Blessed are the merciful, for they will receive mercy.
Hosea 6 : 6 - "For I desired mercy & not sacrifice, ...
Isiah 1 : 18 - “Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow;...
19. If you are willing & obedient,...
(see luke 19 too)
*Quran 39 : 53 -Say: "O 'Ibadi (My slaves) who have transgressed against themselves (by committing evil deeds and sins)! Despair not of the Mercy of Allah: verily, Allah forgives all sins. Truly He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
*
54. *"And turn in repentance and in obedience with true Faith (Islamic Monotheism) to your Lord and submit to Him (in Islam) before the torment comes upon you, (and) then you will not be helped.
*
4) Cruci-Fiction isn't historical even in bible or prophetic.
bible condemns child sacrifice :
Deutoronomy 12 : 31 - You must not do the same for the Lord your God, because every abhorrent thing that *the Lord hates they have done for their gods. They would even burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods.*
2 Chronicles 7 :14 if my people who are called by my name humble themselves, pray, seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.
Jesus is predicted to be saved from cruci-fiction,
Psalms 22: 1. My God, why hast Thou forsaken me?
16. (scripts differ)
21 Save me from the lion : -- & -- from horns of high places, Thou answered me!
(like Mathew 26 :39 Jesus prostrates as a Muslim)
Corinthians 15 : 14 - if Christ has not been raised, then our claim & your faith has been in vain.
31 : I die daily! - (Death is often exaggerated in bible)
No direct witnesses but added on later showing bible changes :
Mark 15 : 40 - There were also women looking on from a distance;...
Luke 23 : 49 - But all his acquaintances, ... stood at a distance,
Mathew 27 :55 - Many women were also there, looking on from a distance;...
vs.
John 19 : 17 - Jesus Carried the cross himself...
(removing Simon likely crucified in his place)
25 - Meanwhile, standing near the cross of Jesus were his mother...
Thesalonians 2 : 9 - The lawless one will be w/ how Satan works & use all sorts of displays of power through signs & wonders that serve the lie,
(Matches paul)
10 wickedness deceives those who are perishing, as they refused to love the truth & be saved.
(Matches Farisis)
*11 For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so they'll believe the lie.*
*Quran 4 : 157 - And because of their (boast), "We killed Messiah 'Îsa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allah," - but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but it appeared so to them, & those who differ ... follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not.*
John 17 : 3 - 5 : You are the only True God, I am who you sent, and I finished my mission ( before crucifiction and after praying for Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him - the comforter. ). Glorify me like I was before with you ( all humans were with God before in ephesians 1.)
Jesus here is fully agreeing with Islam, there is only One God, he is separate, crucifiction isn't his message but waiting praying for Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him.
~~~
5) Verdict : God is 1, Islam is true!
Paul, the lawless false Prophet of Mathew 24 :11 & 12, wanted to remove the laws, Paul degraded God's forgiveness to create a polytheistic son (Acts 9, Hebrew 9 & Romans 10) against scripture (Isaiah 43 & Mathew 12 :7) to remove laws, inspired by the devil. A Perfect God needs no partners. Paul is corrected in salvation, sin & righteousness by the lawgiver & comforter Prophet Muhammad peace & blessings on him of john 1 :21 & 16 :8!
Acts 9 :3 - he (Paul) was approaching Damascus, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him.
Luke 10 :18 - Jesus said, “I watched Satan fall from heaven like a flash of lightning.
Mathew 24 :11 & many false prophets will arise & lead many astray.
12 & because of the increase of lawlessness,
Paul lost blessings for his tribe by removing the laws.
Jeremiah 31 : 36 - If these statutes depart from before Me, An affirmation of Jehovah, Even Israelites doth cease From being a nation before Me all the days.
Cruci-fiction (attempt) led to lawlessness.
Mathew 21 :38 - tenants saw the son (Jesus), & said, ‘This heir; let us kill him & get his inheritance.’
& 43 Therefore I say kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people of fruits of the kingdom. (law)
Kingdom given to Ismael's tribe -
Genesis 17 : 20 - As to Ishmael, I have heard thee; lo, I have blessed him, made him fruitful,...; 12 (Saudi?) princes & I have made him become a great nation;
even paul went to Arabia, where Ismael dwelt 1st (Genesis 21 :21 - Paran) -
Galatians 1 : 17 - nor did I go to Jerusalem to those who were already apostles before me, but I went away at once to Arabia,...
Where the global Prophet, who paul thought he was - would come to correct him (IRONY), -
*Isaiah 42 : 6 - Jehovah, did call thee in righteousness... I give thee for a covenant of a people, And a light of nations. ... 11 The wilderness & ... villages Kedar (Ismael's son) inhabits, Sing inhabitants of Sela, From the top of mountains they cry. (Mt. Selah is Medina)*
Jesus says -
Mathew 15 : 24 - “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
*Jesus leaves his tribe for Islam on return:*
Isiah 49 :1 - ... O peoples, from afar, Jehovah from the womb hath called me, ...
*6. ... `It hath been a light thing That thou art to Me for a servant To raise up the tribes of Jacob,... I have given thee for a light of nations, - same term for Islam of Arabia in bible.*
(& more)
paul is the lawless false prophet, so covenant is given to the fruitful Ismael - the final Prophet lawgiver like Moses, to be forever as comforter is only Nabi Muhammad peace & blessings be upon him!
Solomon songs 5 :16 - He is MUHAMMADIM - (name in Hebrew)
John 16 : 8 - & when he comes, he will prove the world wrong on (original) sin, righteousness (law) & judgment (salvation):
Quran
6 : 162. *Say (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم): "Verily, my Salat (prayer), my sacrifice, my living, and my dying are for Allah, the Lord of the 'Alamin (creation).*
163. *"He has no partner. And of this I have been commanded, and I am the first of the Muslims."*
164. *Say: "Shall I seek a lord other than Allah, while He is the Lord of all things? No person earns any (sin) except against himself (only), and no bearer of burdens shall bear the burden of another. Then unto your Lord is your return, so He will tell you that wherein you have been differing."*
165. And it is He Who has made you generations coming after generations, replacing each other on the earth. And He has raised you in ranks, some above others that He may try you in that which He has bestowed on you. *Surely your Lord is Swift in retribution, and certainly He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.*
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 The crucifixion happened. It was an accepted fact until 500 years later when one man claimed to receive perfect revelations in secret.
Isaiah 53 predicts Jesus' suffering perfectly and why He suffered.
Isaiah 9:6 calls the Son, God.
Paul was a Jew, persecuting Christians. Then he experienced Christ on the road to Damascus, and flipped a 180, joining the very people he was persecuting, to his own death.
Paul left a position of power and respect and safety. He got no earthy rewards for it. He lived a hard persecuted life.
He points out very clear why the old testament law was fulfilled by Christ, which is exactly what Christ Himself said. I did not come to abolish the law, but to fulfill the law. The law is all about Jesus the Messiah, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.
Yes, God commands against child sacrifice, but that is different to God sending his eternal son to shed his blood for the forgiveness of all sin. It goes back to the old testament. Temporary atonement for sin could be given by shedding the blood of a perfect animal without blemish.
Jesus Christ was that perfect sacrifice, without blemish. Only the blood of God can atone for ALL sin.
Abraham predicted this when he told Isaac, God will provide the sacrifice my son. And named the place where he was tested to sacrifice Isaac, The Lord will provide.
Why the sacrificial laws? What was the point? It was pointing to the ultimate sacrifice, the Lamb of God, as John calls Christ.
That's not a contradiction. God does not want people burning their children to appease him. That's evil. God is in control of our salvation, not us.
Because it's not about keeping laws. Its about showing mercy to your enemies. Jesus quoted old testament, stating for I desire mercy, not sacrifice. Its not about a bunch of ritualistic rules. Its about faith in God and loving your neighbor. The law pointed to Christ, it was not what saved. It was a shadow of the true savior.
That's why Jesus broke the law and pointed out David ate the consecrated bread and broke the law. David didn't let a silly ritual stop him and his companions from eating and surviving.
The Jews never understood that. Like you Muslims, they pursued a works based righteousness and thus missed the point.
When Jesus gives the parable of the vineyard, He is stating that he will be killed. The Jews in the parable killed the Son of the owner. That is directly about Jesus. That is why the Jews were thrown out of Israel. Because they rejected and killed their saviour.
You have done a very good job of twisting scripture and trying to insert Islam into it.
The Spirit of God can descend upon Jesus, and the Holy Spirit can be around at the same time. But it was not until Jesus left that the Holy Spirit stayed and dwelt inside believers full time. Because it is the spirit that unlocks the scriptures and gives believers understanding. While Jesus was on earth, He taught the scriptures and was the living fulfillment of the scriptures. After he left, the Holy Spirit returned and remained. That is not a contradiction. You Muslims try to take spiritual things too literally and don't think clearly through the issue. Its no contradiction. There is no reason the Holy Spirit cannot come and go as He pleases and then once Christ is ascended, come back and this time stay and take over Christ's role working in the hearts of believers.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 You're making a mistake. The trinity is all over the old testament.
26 Then God said, “Let US make mankind in OUR image, in OUR likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
27 So God created mankind in HIS OWN image,
in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them.
Angels look like animals, with the heads of animals etc. God looks like a man. He is one who looks like a man, like a son of man. The Son of Man.
That is why humans are above animals as God is above angels who look like animals. Earth copies what is in Heaven.
Jesus is the one who looks like a son of the Gods who rescued Daniel and his friends from the fire. HE is the one appeared to Daniel on the River Tigris, who matches the description of Christ in Revelation.
Here is different persons, all God, calling each other God with the authority of God:
Exodus 3:
There The ANGEL OF THE LORD appeared to him in flames of fire from within a bush.
When THE LORD saw that he had gone over to look, GOD called to him from within the bush, “Moses! Moses!”
“Do not come any closer,” God said. “Take off your sandals, for the place where you are standing is holy ground.” 6 Then he said, “I am the God of your father,[a] the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob.” At this, Moses hid his face, because he was afraid to look at God.
The Angel of the Lord with Hagar:
7 The angel of the Lord found Hagar near a spring in the desert; it was the spring that is beside the road to Shur. 8 And he said, “Hagar, slave of Sarai, where have you come from, and where are you going?”
“I’m running away from my mistress Sarai,” she answered.
9 Then the angel of the Lord told her, “Go back to your mistress and submit to her.” 10 The angel added, “I will increase your descendants so much that they will be too numerous to count.”
11 The angel of the Lord also said to her:
“You are now pregnant
and you will give birth to a son.
You shall name him Ishmael,[a]
for the Lord has heard of your misery.
12 He will be a wild donkey of a man;
his hand will be against everyone
and everyone’s hand against him,
and he will live in hostility
toward[b] all his brothers.”
13 She gave this name to the Lord who spoke to her: “You are the God who sees me,” for she said, “I have now seen[c] the One who sees me.” 14 That is why the well was called Beer Lahai Roi[d]; it is still there, between Kadesh and Bered.
Hagar called the Angel of the Lord God. And the Angel of the Lord said I will increase your descendants. He has the authority of God.
God appears to Samson's parents:
16 The angel of the Lord replied, “Even though you detain me, I will not eat any of your food. But if you prepare a burnt offering, offer it to the Lord.” (Manoah did not realize that it was the angel of the Lord.)
17 Then Manoah inquired of the angel of the Lord, “What is your name, so that we may honor you when your word comes true?”
18 He replied, “Why do you ask my name? It is beyond understanding.[a]” 19 Then Manoah took a young goat, together with the grain offering, and sacrificed it on a rock to the Lord. And the Lord did an amazing thing while Manoah and his wife watched: 20 As the flame blazed up from the altar toward heaven, the angel of the Lord ascended in the flame. Seeing this, Manoah and his wife fell with their faces to the ground. 21 When the angel of the Lord did not show himself again to Manoah and his wife, Manoah realized that it was the angel of the Lord.
22 “We are doomed to die!” he said to his wife. “We have seen God!”
The Spirit of God is active all through the Old Testament. He is present at Creation, gives man life, gives certain Judges and prophets power, convicts people etc. It is this Holy Spirit Who Jesus said would come after He left. The Spirit of Truth. Nothing to do with Mohammed.
The Angel of the Lord is God aka, Jesus.
The Lord (Father) the Angel of the Lord (Jesus Christ The Son) the Spirit of the Lord (The Holy Spirit)
Jesus can enter into a human body. That is perfectly within Gods power and ability. Jesus came as a humble suffering servant. But we all stand before Him in His eternal Holy glory on judgement day. If you think He is just a man or a prophet and not God, who died for the sin of the world, He will say I never knew you, Depart from me!
@@maxINaus 1) no its not accepted but made up, many christian knew Jesus wasn't crucified, the bible changed the witnesses as seen in verses of section 4. claims mean nothing without evidence.
2) God condemns child sacrifice. 3) paul saw devil in acts 9 :3
4) Pslam 22 predicts Jesus will be saved as does pslams 91!
5) "That's not a contradiction." - it is look at mathew 12 : 7 and 9 above, no sacrfice mercy.
"That's why Jesus broke the law" - any evidence? no!
Jesus actually taught follow the law,
you guys sold out like the farisis.
just like you guys sell out to lobbies today.
6) " He is stating that he will be killed." - he prayed not to be killed as a Muslim in mathew 26 :39! and psalams 22 and 91 said he won't as well!
" try to take spiritual things too literally" - and you don't have any form which is why you contradict yourself and are run by lobbies and fully opposite of Jesus!
7) "After he left, the Holy Spirit " - this is another example of you just ocntradicting the bible and making up stuff, it never says that at all...
it says JOhn 16 : 7 - I have to leave for the comfortor...
john 1 :21 - there is a prophet after Jesus,
this is Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him.
there is no holy spirit!
"it was the spring that is beside the road to Shur." - zam zam well at hajj!
Salam brother
How about those people who refrain from mentioning some sahih Hadith or do tahreef in Hadith and don’t translate Hadith from Arabic to English correctly. Darussalam has many Tahreef. Just out of Animosity and sectarianism.
For example after the names of the Family of the prophet they refuse to put Alayhissalam even though it is present in the Arabic text.
Should we refrain from speaking the truth just because it gives credence to others in some aspect?
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Prophet Muhammad said. The Quran is revealed to me and the Quran is explained to me. Without hadith, tafsir and sire, the Qur'an cannot be understood.
And guess what, even with the hadiths scholars have different opinions
@@ricbla3499 so what???
@@Unemi134 it refutes what you said, people interpret the Quran in different ways even with hadiths
Whats interesting is that Sunnis and Shias both say that they have “Authentic” Hearsay.
@@ricbla3499 that is why we have a school of hadith and madhhab, you think the Prophet did the same things every day.
Why is he talking in urdu when its supposed to be in English. I dont understand urdu.
Dont worry everything he said in Urdu, he then also quickly said that in English, so you are not missing anything.
Part 2
Part 2?
Sir believe me what y say 💭 about R.dawkun book 📗 in speech same things happen with me I swear
Please say Hadith rather than hadisas that is how the arabs pronounce it and that is how it is spelt
I say Hadis. This is my pronunciation.
Salam,
Show me a single verse in the Quran where Allah tells us follow other books/hadiths
77:50. Fabiayyi HADEETHIN baAAdahu yuminoona
77:50. In what narration, beyond this, will they believe?
Do you believe that the quran is preserved ? if you say yes then how do you explain the qiraat ? and which one is correct and why??
@@SaidSaadouni you wrote : "Do you believe that the quran is preserved ? if you say yes then how do you explain the qiraat ? and which one is correct and why??"
response : if your hadith books (collection of peoples imagination) explain the quran, can you show us the hadiths that explain these surahs ?
The Surah numbers are as follows; 23,27,29,35,51,57,58,64,67,69,70,73,76,81,82,86,88,89,90,94,100,101,103,104, 105,106,107, and 109.
salam
Or for attend a session
Sir please join Hamza den . Arena
Drugs and alcohol
Where does brother Adnan live ? I would like to meet him
In the UK.. please don't harm him.. he's a nice man.
@@wghasim uk is pretty big 😁
❤💓💓💓 from somalia
Allah has given us wisdom and intellect to distinguish between right and wrong
I do not want to discuss your beliefs with you, because^ is your choose.
Please please and please don't talking about what you don't know.
Respect the all prophets, especially prophet Muhammad peace be upon him
Do not insulting again the prophet Muhammad( the best leader forever in the world)
crucifiction attempt on Jesus to remove laws will make his ppl lose blessings in mathew 21 :43 & jeremia 31 :36. pauls in acts 9 : 3 saw devil of luke 10 :18 went to Arabia, is lawless false prophet in mathew 24 :11 thought he's who will correct him - comforter in John 1 :21 & 16 :8, Prophet law giver like Musa is Muhammad peace and blessings on him!
Jesus is only sent to his tribe, after mark 16 : 8 Jesus's 2nd appearance saying he's sent for the world is an admitted fabrication. isaiah 49 says Jesus will leave his tribe and return following the light of nations of isaiah 42, a new covenent, from the Arab Prophet from mt selah Medina, this is clearly Islam.
Abraham wasn't from juda, juda came like 2 centuries later, Ibrahim and Ismael were Muslims who built the Kaba, even Jacob imitates the hajj in genesis 28!
Jesus said God prefers mercy over sacrifice in mathew 9 & 12, but paul in hebrews 9 says God can't forgive without a sacrifice. this shows 2, Paul contradicts Jesus & paul degrades God's forgiveness to intro a new god, showing why polytheism is the worst sin, it degrades God's Attributes! - *Best response to paulites, we follow Jesus as we believe God can forgive without a sacrifice, using the verse above, it's over!*
this is on top of christian's contradictions of Allah's Tawhid Asma wa Siffat and historical contradictions with esp. with the law.
isaiah 43 : 10 says no new God will form, so john 1 is wrong (& likely an addition due to different writing style), the word is God's attribute in correct translation. It says word became flesh but job 25 :4 shows God can't come from a womb as whats from a womb is impure while God's word called pure in psalms 116 : 140 - Your word is pure!
Jesus is a created from the Word of God, He's not an attribute of God.
psalms 22 and 91 predicts Jesus is saved matching Quran 4 : 137.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
every person who has good wisdom know that humans was never become allah.
but, for some people confusing the difference between human being and allah.
Allah is a necessary being
No any reference from Quran
Actually the first Group that went away from main body of Muslim were Muawiya and Bani ummya Stop teaching wrong things to Young Muslim
kawarij was before Mu'awaiyah who Hasan reconciled with oh uneducated one!
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 lol 😂 they formed after battle of safeen that was after mwayia and Ali fought so they were after knowledgeable one
Juma karim❤plze read surah kahf
Tichi....lol
Hadith rejection is foolish. The prophet was sent with the Quran and explained its meaning. Without the hadith its meaning is lost. If the prophet's explanation of the Quran was not required by mankind, there was no need to reveal the Quran over 23 years. Rather the Quran could've been revealed all at once and then then prophet's job would have been completed straight away. You make the role of our prophet SAW redundant by rejecting the hadith which is a great disrespect.
and the Qur'an says that as well, like Quran 16 :64.
Qur'an tells us so many worships that are explained in hadiths like salat or zakat amount and its types etc.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 dont forget about hajj a crucial pillar in our deen
@@corax584 yup, even though there are details in surah 2, there are extra details in hadith, i think with sacrifice mentioned in surah 22 but details for that is in hadiths.
Allah: Warns about homosexuality
Quranists: no no homosexuality is fine
Allah: Sacrifice animal
Quranist : no no it's just metaphor for Ibrahim
Allah: I created Adam from clay
Quranist: no no it's just a story. Adam doesn't exist
Allah: promised to preserve His religion
Quranist: no no muslims follow corrupted Islam
Allah: fight the disbelievers
Quranist: no no it means hug them
Allah: when you are in dispute refer it to Allah AND His Messenger
Quranist: no no we refer it to our deity edip yuksel
Allah: send salutation on the Prophet
Quranist: oh heck no
Allah: follow the Messenger
Quranist: huh what? I couldn't hear
@@friendlyneighbourhoodmusli6565
What you did is a strawman fallacy,
Hypocrite, all you did is a slander,
As you sunnis love to slander
As you slander the Prophet
And His followers anyone,
Allah warns that you're liars/63:1
The ones who add "Muhammad"
To their Shahada (just as you do)
To make show of their fake faith.
1. Homosexuality is Faxsh/7:80-81
And Faxsh is totally Haram/7:33.
While your Hadiths teach
As if Prophet would suck
On the tongue of a little boy
Or make his hands be licked
Or order people to lick hands
Or their hands to be licked
After they eat the food.
And another hadith teaches
That one Sahaba was holding
His genital while another Sahaba
Was giving a speech, so ignorant.
2. Allah clearly orders the Zabbaha
And it's clarified in surah Baqarah.
While you pagan sunnis question
Just like Jews used to question,
You say that "Quran doesn't detail,
Where is the detail? Hadith details",
So you would ask the Prophet himself
If he was alive with us, you disrespect
you're even worse than Jews in that,
Jews at least obeyed, while you don't,
You don't even keep the rules of Halal,
You do shoot with pistols to the heads
Of animals to sacrifise calling it Halal,
That's totally Haram as taught in 5:3.
3. Adam existed, and he's mortal,
But you ignorants say that he's alive,
As if he is in the 1st heaven standing.
While God teaches in 35:22 verse that
We can't make hear those in the graves,
While you pagans say that Muhammad
Saw and talked to prophets who passed,
But God taught that they've passed/3:144.
And not just that, you even talk to him
In which you call your "prayer" to God,
That's your shirk, in your tashahhud,
That's the same "quburi" act as shias
Who say "Yaa Ali, Yaa Husayn" same.
And they lick walls, you lick a stone,
(Which is shaped like that part of Lat
Which your Bukhari 2731, 2731 tells,)
You have much similarities with shias,
Cuz you both follow false Ahadith, lies.
And you say that Satan shaped Adam,
While God teaches that He shaped him,
You people attribute that shirk to God,
So you think that Satan created you,
Perhaps you wanna worship him.
4. You are not Muslims,
Your religion isn't Islam.
Muslims follow true Islam of God,
And submit to Him, not to mullas,
You hypocrites don't follow Islam,
You follow proveless lies of Satan.
Allah warned that Satan throws
Into the sayings of the Prophets,
While He makes His verses precise,
Means that only Quran is preserved,
While your Ahadith are from Satan.
Here is 22:52 for reference,
Tho you don't undersrand it,
Cuz you think you need Hadith,
You basically make Hadith over
Quran and over the God Himself,
Cuz as if God can't speak clearly,
as if He needs a man to explain.
Does a king order his postman
To explain what he has meant?
That's nonsense.
You sunnis ask what God meant,
Just as Allah warns of disbelievers
And just as Jews asked/2:26, 2:67-71.
That's cuz some lower people
Wanna manipulate the words
Which the King maybe saying.
That's where your Hadiths come.
While Muslims obey God Himself,
And Allah explains AlQuran to us
In AlQuran itself/24:18, 24:58-61,
upon the Prophet is only the delivery
Of the Message / Quran/5:99, 14:52,
so the clarification of the Prophet
In verses 16:44, 16:64 is about
Prophet reciting Quran to us
As explained in verses 98:1-3,
And cuz Quran is already clear
And what he needs to do is only
To recite it for it to be manifested,
Quran is clarification of all things /16:89.
5. Fight you say, actually
there's said "qaatiloo",
which is mainly used
to mean "kill" clearly
Or to "get rid of" them.
And killing is against those
Who do mischief in the land,
Not against the peaceful ones.
Check 2:190-193, 8:61, so on.
While you pagan sunnies
Order to kill literally anyone
Who doesn't agree with you,
Who leaves your religion
of pagan sunnism.
Cuz your Hadith clearly says:
"Whoever changes his religion
- kill him", so can you kill anyone
Who changes his religion? You do,
While you lie in your books about it,
But your Hadith clearly orders that,
Forcing people to hide their faith,
Cuz if they've no faith anymore
In what you ignorants preach,
They have to hide their faith,
Or you may just kill those people,
Doesn't matter they believer or not,
If a believer leaves your paganism
You kill him, if a disbeliever leaves
You kill, while he may give peace
While God orders to give peace
To those who give peace/4:90.
You disobey God.
Basically Hadith: "kill non-sunnies"
Sunni: no no it means hug them.
This is actually a better example
Than which you slandered on us.
6. I don't even trust Edip Yuksel,
He denies veiling, while in 33:59,
Women are clearly ordered veiling.
So your slander is clearly baseless
You should rather make it like this:
Sunni: "we refer only to mullas
Cuz no one can understand Quran
And Hadith and Sharh and Tafaasir,
All those are unclear but our mullas".
While we refer to Allah
And His Messenger
By coming to Quran
WHICH the Messenger
Brought, not just fell on us,
So we refer to him, you don't.
And here how we can directly
Refer to the Messenger himself
In verse 41:6 Prophet taught that
He is a man like us, and ordered
To seek a straight path to Allah.
(Not said through me or to me)
So if we refer to him -
He leads to Allah alone.
Khalaas.
Simple.
7. Where is word "send"? liar,
There isn't said "send salawat",
You ignorants don't even know
What word "salaah" means at all,
And you call your mullas "scholars"?
There is said "Salloo"
Which means "connect",
Same word as in verse 4:102.
Which you translate as "pray".
So why is it "pray" there
And "bless" here? Liars,
Is that for you what you choose?
There is just one root meaning,
Can't be two, but only "broad",
Not "many", know the difference.
If you say "pray"
It means "Allah prays to Muhammad",
And orders us to "pray to Muhammad",
(as you talk to him in your tashahhud,
That's shirk & an ignorant qubiri action.)
It obviously can't mean pray,
It just makes no sense at all.
If you say "bless"
Then 4:102 shouldn't mean pray,
So you shouldn't pray five times.
You are just trapping yourselves.
While if you look at verses 75:31-32,
(In Arabic) you can know by logic,
That he did the opposite there,
So the opposite of Salah
Is to "turn away" clearly,
And opposite of "turn away"
Is to "adhere, connect, attach".
That's how Quran exposes your lies,
So Salah is about "attachment" here,
And Allah attached to the Prophet
So He ordered us to attach to him
And we attach to the Prophet
Throught AlQuran, obviously.
Cuz Prophet brought Quran,
And through Prophet we also
Attach to Quran, & thus to God.
So that all can be done by Quran alone.
So that is becoming the rope of Allah,
Which we should all hold firmly/3:103.
While if you follow lies of Ahadith,
You get disattached from AlQuran,
You start twisting and lying about it,
& basically turning away from Quran.
So if Allah calls Quran fully detailed/6:114,
You will say "no, Quran isn't fully detailed"
And in 12:111, when Allah calls Quran:
"A detailed explanation of all things"
You sunnis say "no",
You're the Quran Rejectors.
8. Follow the Prophet
Has a context each time
After mention of AhlulKitab,
Cuz if God says follow Quran alone,
They may claim to have their Quran.
So follow the Prophet is used there.
(While there are clear verses telling
Us to follow Quran alone/7:3, 6:154)
And following the Prophet
Leads to follow Quran alone,
Cuz Prophet had no other wahi,
& Prophet would follow only wahi,
Which verses 10:15-17 make clear.
So if Prophet followed Quran alone
And we tell you to follow the Prophet
You follow Bukhari & other proveless lies
You can't follow the Prophet
And/or whatever he did at all,
It's not what's meant by follow,
You can't go by his footsteps
& then marry as he married
Or die as he died before,
Or to marry his wives
Or to lie in his grave,
Cuz follow doesn't mean that,
It means to follow guidance.
Following the Prophet a.s.
Means following his path,
And his path was Quran.
Nothing else.
Al-An'am 6:153
وَأَنَّ هَٰذَا صِرَٰطِى مُسْتَقِيمًا فَٱتَّبِعُوهُۖ وَلَا تَتَّبِعُوا۟ ٱلسُّبُلَ فَتَفَرَّقَ بِكُمْ عَن سَبِيلِهِۦۚ ذَٰلِكُمْ وَصَّىٰكُم بِهِۦ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَتَّقُونَ
And, [moreover], this is My path, which is straight, so follow it; and do not follow [other] ways, for you will be separated from His way. This has He instructed you that you may become righteous.
AOA sir plz expose ghamdi and his fitna
What fitnah spread by javed ghamidi?I think he is a great thinker of Islam
He is a great scholar regardless of whatever you say.
@@AghaAbbas7 let me tell you bro but I am not here to debate.He says hadith is only a historical record nothing else,he doesnt believe in second coming of Christ or the coming of mehdi.He believes all things that are haram are only in the Quran and not in hadith so he allows tatoos,plastic surgery,gold,silk and also says circumsion is not compulsory.He believes the Prophet didn't go on the miraj but it was a dream despite multiple reports of hazrat aisha saying its wasn't just a dream.He believes jizya was only at the time of the prophet,he believes slavery was abolished by the Quran despite the fact that slaves were taken by all caliphs and hazrat Umer was matryed by a slave and many more.There are good things he has said and I have studied multiple of his works but many of his views are very danger and only based on his view and interpretation and not that of the Prophet or the sahaba or the tabieen or the taba tabian.Just search on these points if you want but am not here to start a debate.Peace
@@Titan-ub5op Bro with all due respect just search up on him and you will find out.Read my last comment and you will see what I am talking about.Dont blindly follow someone also see their counter arguments and then come to a conclusion.Peace
@@Soloman827 Ghamidi sahib does not reject hadith outright,But in his view hadith is a historical record of muslims and in them their are Sunnah of the Prophet (as) Kaul of Sahaba and Tabi'in,and he say that hadith that reaches us are not above criticism,because they are a human effort and must be put to test,even the classical scholars of the past like imam bukhari rejected thousands of do called ahadith and imam Muslim expressed his concern regarding hadith literature was around in his time,he wrote MUQADAMA in his Sahih!Scholars like Al Suyuti,ibn Hajar,ibn Salah wrote principles to accept or reject hadith...
I think you misunderstood Ghamidi sahib's approach,he says,that his hujjat is Qur'an and Sunnah,he says Sunnah and Hadith are Not one or the same...but I will look further into the things you accuse him off,inshaAllah...salaam
It's unfair to consider Javed Ahmad ghamidi as hadith rejector
@نحن جند السماء what do u think what he is?
@نحن جند السماء so many ulema against him, ah what a logic and what a argument, i don't appreciate the majority i always appreciate the arguments, u should look arguments of someone,
Adnan you shoot yourself and Islam in the foot when you claim Hadith is part of divine revelation.
Quran says best Hadith is Quran itself
Further more
Hadith is here say
No eyewitnesses or even those who got from eyewitnesses
Allah says
Quran is a guide
Quran is clear in Arabic
Quran is detailed
Quran is explanation of all things
No where does is suggest supplimentary information to explain it
If Mohamed did hijja it would be by Quran standards yet it's not there.
So accept Quran lucks completeness.
If Mohamed is best example Quran doesn't give those examples.
So you have to follow Allah AND messenger clear shirk
Imam al-Barbahari (rahimahullah) stated: “Know that Allah’s Messenger (Peace be upon him) said: “My ummah will divide into 73 sects, all of them will be in the Fire except for one, and that is the Jamā’ah.” It was said, “And who are they, O Allah’s Messenger?” He (Peace be upon him) responded, “That which I and my Companions are upon today. (Tirmidhi, no. 2641)
Salam brother, Read these verses first. See if these are unambiguous or not and then read the work of the mullahs. See how they expanded on the simple 4 prohibitions.
Q5:3 Prohibited to you are dead animals, blood, the
esh of swine, and that
which has been dedicated to other than Allah,
Q2:173 He has ONLY forbidden to you dead animals, blood, the fl
esh
of swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah . But whoever is forced [by necessity], neither desiring [it] nor transgressing [its limit], there is no sin upon him. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.
Q16:115-116 He has only forbidden to you dead animals, blood, the
esh of
swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah. But whoever is forced [by necessity], neither desiring [it] nor transgressing [its limit] - then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. And do not say about what your tongues assert of untruth, " This is lawful and this is unlawful" to invent falsehood about Allah . Indeed, those who invent FALSEHOOD about Allah will not succeed.
Q6:145-149 Say, I DO NOT FIND in what has been revealed to me
anything forbidden to eat except carrion, running blood, swine which is impure or a sinful o ering in the name of any other than Allah. But if someone is compelled by necessity neither driven by desire nor exceeding immediate need then surely your Lord is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful."
Q6:150 Say, [O Muhammad], Bring forward your witnesses who will testify
that Allah has prohibited this." And if they testify, DO NOT TESTIFY WITH THEM. And do not follow the desires of those who deny Our verses and those who do not believe in the Hereafter, while they equate [others] with their Lord.
Q6:38 All living beings roaming the earth and winged birds soaring in the sky are communities like yourselves. WE HAVE LEFT NOTHING OUT OF THIS BOOK Then to their Lord they will be gathered all together.
Brother leave the hadith and madhabs and come back to the Book of Allah. Do not make false allegations that Quran does not give details in the Quran. If you do not find any you just have not read it carefully. To start just try to find the number of rakat in each prayer in all the hadith books you consider authentic. If you are unsuccessful in establishing salah using hadith get back to me I will show you everything in the Quran.
People of hadiths are the ones following Qur'an as you no hadith people reject the Qur'an which says to follow the sunnah explanationa of the Quran like in Qur'an 16 :64!
Qur'an tells us so many worships that are explained in hadiths like salat or zakat amount and its types etc.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Let us start with salah. Can you tell me which hadith in the collection you consider authentic do you find the number of rakat in each salah ? I guess you agree that you can pray without this basic information. Unfortunately for you, you will not find this basic information in any hadith book. In fact hadith does not help you at all in establishing salah.
*1 simple question to hadith rejectors:*
You know that in the very first Surah of the Qur'ān (Al-Fatihah) we say:
مالك يوم الدين - Ayah Number 3
I think everyone would agree with me; but when one listens to some Mashāikh you can also hear this:
ملك يوم الدين ~ Ayah Number 3
Now here's the question:
Does it mean ملك or مالك?
مالك = Owner
ملك = King
So, now I want you to make a justification for this difference in the recitation. May Allah guide you to Ahl-ul-Sunnah and right way how to pray☝🏼
@@aniiss04 Irrelevant question for me to achieve salvation. The Quran was not revealed in written form and orally it does not change much for me.
But according to hadith idolators the verse of suckling and stoning was eaten by a goat and hence lost for ever. Some sahab believed that some of the surah collected by Usman was not even a part of the Quran. Furthermore I can show you blasphemy, contradictions, illogical and unscienctific stuff, slandering of prophets wives in your most authentic collections.