Catholic Archbishop at DNC - A Priest Responds: "We Need to Stand Up Against Evil"
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 дек 2024
- SUBSCRIBE: @FrDanielMaria
Here are my thoughts about the presence of the archbishop of Chicago Blase Cupich at the Democratic National Convention and the role of shepherds in succeeding the apostles and Church Fathers; outside Planned Parenthood was offering free abortions and vasectomies, adding to the insult. #kamalaharris #DNC #abortion #plannedparenthood #Catholicism #Christianity #uselections2024 #Democratics #walz #timwalz #Trump #GOP #CatholicChurch #genderideology #gaymarriage #Chicago #Cupich
As a son of a Croatian father, I am very surprised that Cardinal Čupić giving the opening prayer at the DNC convention which is open sporting the killing of babies by the means of abortion, performing vasectomy’s And supporting LBGTQI relationships, particularly because from the seventh century Croatians have been absolutely opposed to these sinful acts!! On behalf of Croatians worldwide I would like to voicemail absolute disgust of how Cardinall Čupić DIDN’T speak against the DNC’s policies on abortion and the killing of human life throughout the entire 9-month gestation period!! ABSOLUTELY DISGRACEFUL!!
@@StipeKulas we are all God’s children and you should follow the teachings of the Bible:
"Why do you see the speck in your neighbor's eye, but do not notice the log in your own eye? Or how can you say to your neighbor, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye' while the log is in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your neighbor's eye." (Matthew 7:3-5).
I pray a family member of yours is never raped or told their child is going to be born and live for only a few hours and in those hours it will suffer extraordinary pain! I pray that you don’t know anyone that has to make a decision to save the life of their wife or unborn child. If you have never been in those shoes, don’t judge! God asks us not to be a judge, but to be a witness!
@@msizzygirl1you must read the Bijbel obout Sodoma and Gomora!Amen!
@@msizzygirl1 Are you not judging? You started out with , “We are all God’s children”. , and what he is saying is correct. He is speaking about atrocities for human beings. The genocide of babies of which MOST are perfectly healthy! 1,000,000 babies are aborted EVERY YEAR in the United States. A doctor, obstetrician, recently said that a mother’s life being in danger during childbirth is rare. We now have C-Sections and they deliver if the mother or baby are in distress, and the mother is fine.
If there is rape or incest, there is no reason to abort that baby. That baby is a gift from God and God does not want that life destroyed.
I don’t know if you personally had a bad experience, and if you did I am sorry. But that is not the norm. I seriously doubt that a doctor would let a dying baby experience extraordinary pain if they are dying. What about the pain that an aborted baby feels when they tear off their limbs and crush their skull to get the baby out of the woman’s womb? Did you know that? And that happens on a daily basis!
There was an account of a family that knew that their baby was going to be born extremely deformed and that it would not live. The doctors tried and tried to get the mother and father to have an abortion, and they refused. The mother carried her baby full term and the baby was born . The mother and father held and loved their baby until it died. They wanted to see their baby. They had the whole family there and celebrated the life of the baby that was given to them. That little soul was born, loved and held by his parents. That is true love.
The Cardinal also never mentioned the name of Jesus and hid his pectoral crucifix behind his coat. May God forgive his omissions.
@@StipeKulas yet you support a sexual predator who rapes, ogles a young girls changing, lusts after his own daughter, claims to be able to grab any woman’s genitalia, commits adultery and spews hate toward God’s children! Read Proverbs 6:16-19 and read what God has to say about people like Trump!
Yes, stand up to this evil. Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen set the stage perfectly: “Evil may have its hour, but God will have His Day.”
Horrible to see a Catholic priest backing the evilness of the Democrats sad. Not true disciple of Christ more of a judas
Naw .We say long ago
Indeed.
The laity need to PROTEST Cupich. He is not a man of God. Supporting evil politicians instead of holy priests is horrible.
The problem is Devil runs the world. He is liar and murderer. This is the reason why liars and murderers feel good while righteous persons are persecuted. This is the reason why Hitler got the power, but Christ was executed as "blasphemer" and "rioter" by denunciation of clergy.
This is the reason why the whole world is Sodom.
That's why we've got the Gospel about the God's kingdom. Jehovah would put everything in order. The dead will be resurected and we'll meet our loved ones again! :-)
I am Catholic and I agree with you Father. Only Lord Jesus can save us.
Amen hallelujah 🙌 🙏
Only moral people should save us. GOD gave us free will. GOD would want good to eliminate evil. He didn't cause the problem. We are GODs warriors.
Cowards depend on others.
Our forefathers fought for RIGHT. And won.
@@nancyschneider4252 “save” from what?
Please be specific
Deo Gratius
Mary Queen of the clergy pray for our priests
Thank you Father Daniel we need strong Priests like you!
Amen hallelujah 🙌 🙏
Too sad, shameful, and disgusting . What is wrong with him! Lord, have mercy on us and the whole world.
I am Catholic and I agree with you Father.
I pray that God will give you a spirit of discernment....
@@msdivaatta And to you too.
Almost all Catholic priests have committed the sin of silence for decades! Please pray for a new generation of priests who will tell the truth!
And bishops!
Cupich didn't! He could have refused to speak. That would be a sin of silence. He agreed to do what he did, or didn't, at the DNC. I honestly wonder if he stopped by the "abortion mobile" to give a blessing on his way to the event. Bare in mind that 20+ popes out of the 1st 30-something, were martyred for the faith and Cupich is afraid to hurt Democrat's feelings. The Republicans choice for an opening prayer was not much better, as he prayed around the subject of abortion, while mentioning everything else.
It’s not only the Catholic Priests, many Church Leaders make no distinction between Republican and Democrat party platforms wanting to avoid any form of politics. I’m not saying they tell people how to vote, rather speak up against Sin and Evil. How a Christian can vote Democrat (especially Harris and Walz) is beyond logic.
@@daved7808 The CC's involvement in politics is guided by its quest to uphold moral & ethical principles required of, in the Gospel. The Church does not endorse one party or another political party, but speaks out on issues that affect human dignity and the common moral good.
Cupich is part of antipope (see for example ruclips.net/video/8QIdUK-1aFU/видео.html) entourage in the service of big finance. Big finance controls everything (Vatican, politicians, judges, police, media, star system, culture, ...) and wants to destroy Christian identity and traditional family because the are the greatest obstacle to full control over people. Muslim immigrants in Europe are part of the plan (also to exploit the resulting riots in order to impose a de facto dictatorship). Read GK Chesterton. Some quotes:
The crimes of England, 1916: "The libel law [is] now used, not to crush lies about private life, but to crush truths about public life."
What's wrong with the world, 1910: "In the quarrel earlier alluded to between the energetic Progressive and the obstinate Conservative (or, to talk a tenderer language, between Hudge and Gudge), the state of cross-purposes is at the present moment acute. The Tory says he wants to preserve family life in Cindertown; the Socialist very reasonably points out to him that in Cindertown at present there isn't any family life to preserve. But Hudge, the Socialist, in his turn, is highly vague and mysterious about whether he would preserve the family life if there were any; or whether he will try to restore it where it has disappeared. It is all very confusing. The Tory sometimes talks as if he wanted to tighten the domestic bonds that do not exist; the Socialist as if he wanted to loosen the bonds that do not bind anybody. The question we all want to ask of both of them is the original ideal question, "Do you want to keep the family at all?" If Hudge, the Socialist, does want the family he must be prepared for the natural restraints, distinctions and divisions of labor in the family. He must brace himself up to bear the idea of the woman having a preference for the private house and a man for the public house. He must manage to endure somehow the idea of a woman being womanly, which does not mean soft and yielding, but handy, thrifty, rather hard, and very humorous. He must confront without a quiver the notion of a child who shall be childish, that is, full of energy, but without an idea of independence; fundamentally as eager for authority as for information and butter-scotch. If a man, a woman and a child live together any more in free and sovereign households, these ancient relations will recur; and Hudge must put up with it. He can only avoid it by destroying the family, driving both sexes into sexless hives and hordes, and bringing up all children as the children of the state--like Oliver Twist. But if these stern words must be addressed to Hudge, neither shall Gudge escape a somewhat severe admonition. For the plain truth to be told pretty sharply to the Tory is this, that if he wants the family to remain, if he wants to be strong enough to resist the rending forces of our essentially savage commerce, he must make some very big sacrifices and try to equalize property. The overwhelming mass of the English people at this particular instant are simply too poor to be domestic. They are as domestic as they can manage; they are much more domestic than the governing class; but they cannot get what good there was originally meant to be in this institution, simply because they have not got enough money. The man ought to stand for a certain magnanimity, quite lawfully expressed in throwing money away: but if under given circumstances he can only do it by throwing the week's food away, then he is not magnanimous, but mean. The woman ought to stand for a certain wisdom which is well expressed in valuing things rightly and guarding money sensibly; but how is she to guard money if there is no money to guard? The child ought to look on his mother as a fountain of natural fun and poetry; but how can he unless the fountain, like other fountains, is allowed to play? What chance have any of these ancient arts and functions in a house so hideously topsy-turvy; a house where the woman is out working and the man isn't; and the child is forced by law to think his schoolmaster's requirements more important than his mother's? No, Gudge and his friends in the House of Lords and the Carlton Club must make up their minds on this matter, and that very quickly. If they are content to have England turned into a beehive and an ant-hill, decorated here and there with a few faded butterflies playing at an old game called domesticity in the intervals of the divorce court, then let them have their empire of insects; they will find plenty of Socialists who will give it to them. But if they want a domestic England, they must "shell out," as the phrase goes, to a vastly greater extent than any Radical politician has yet dared to suggest; they must endure burdens much heavier than the Budget and strokes much deadlier than the death duties; for the thing to be done is nothing more nor less than the distribution of the great fortunes and the great estates. We can now only avoid Socialism by a change as vast as Socialism. If we are to save property, we must distribute property, almost as sternly and sweepingly as did the French Revolution. If we are to preserve the family we must revolutionize the nation. ...
The superstition of divorce, 1920: "It is exceedingly characteristic of the dreary decades before the War that the forms of freedom in which they seemed to specialise were suicide and divorce. I am not at the moment pronouncing on the moral problem of either; I am merely noting, as signs of those times, those two true or false counsels of despair; the end of life and the end of love. Other forms of freedom were being increasingly curtailed. Freedom indeed was the one thing that progressives and conservatives alike contemned. Socialists were largely concerned to prevent strikes, by State arbitration; that is, by adding another rich man to give the casting vote between rich and poor. Even in claiming what they called the right to work they tacitly surrendered the right to leave off working. Tories were preaching conscription, not so much to defend the independence of England as to destroy the independence of Englishmen. Liberals, of course, were chiefly interested in eliminating liberty, especially touching beer and betting. It was wicked to fight, and unsafe even to argue; for citing any certain and contemporary fact might land one in a libel action. As all these doors were successfully shut in our faces along the chilly and cheerless corridor of progress (with its glazed tiles) the doors of death and divorce alone stood open, or rather opened wider and wider. ... As we have already seen papers and public men to-day make a vast parade of the necessity of setting the poor man free to get a divorce. Now why are they so mortally anxious that he should be free to get a divorce, and not in the least anxious that he should be free to get anything else? ... The answer is, I regret to say, that this social campaign, in most though by no means all of its most prominent campaigners, relies in this matter on a very smug and pestilent piece of chalk. There are some advocates of democratic divorce who are really advocates of general democratic freedom; but they are the exceptions; I might say, with all respect, that they are the dupes. The omnipresence of the thing in the press and in political society is due to a motive precisely opposite to the motive professed. The modern rulers, who are simply the rich men, are really quite consistent in their attitude to the poor man. It is the same spirit which takes away his children under the pretence of order, which takes away his wife under the pretence of liberty. That which wishes, in the words of the comic song, to break up the happy home, is primarily anxious not to break up the much more unhappy factory. Capitalism, of course, is at war with the family, for the same reason which has led to its being at war with the Trade Union. This indeed is the only sense in which it is true that capitalism is connected with individualism. Capitalism believes in collectivism for itself and individualism for its enemies. It desires its victims to be individuals, or (in other words) to be atoms. For the word atom, in its clearest meaning (which is none too clear) might be translated as "individual." If there be any bond, if there be any brotherhood, if there be any class loyalty or domestic discipline, by which the poor can help the poor, these emancipators will certainly strive to loosen that bond or lift that discipline in the most liberal fashion. If there be such a brotherhood, these individualists will redistribute it in the form of individuals; or in other words smash it to atoms. The masters of modern plutocracy know what they are about. They are making no mistake; they can be cleared of the slander of inconsistency. A very profound and precise instinct has let them to single out the human household as the chief obstacle to their inhuman progress. Without the family we are helpless before the State, which in our modern case is the Servile State. To use a military metaphor, the family is the only formation in which the charge of the rich can be repulsed. It is a force that forms twos as soldiers form fours; and, in every peasant country, has stood in the square house or the square plot of land as infantry have stood in squares against cavalry. How this force operates this, and why, I will try to explain in the last of these articles. But it is when it is most nearly ridden down by the horsemen of pride and privilege, as in Poland or Ireland, when the battle grows most desperate and the hope most dark, that men begin to understand why that wild oath in its beginnings was flung beyond the bonds of the world; and what would seem as passing as a vision is made permanent as a vow."
God bless you father. Half of the country going mad. Seeing this Bishop praying to none believer and baby killers make me sick to my stomach.
I do agree maybe stumping at a presidential rally isnt good.
But as Catholics we are called to love everyone. Sinners, non-believers too
Baby-killers? God was killing babies.
I can understand not wanting abortion. But let's not hide behind God to do it.
JESUS PRAYED TO NON BELIEVERS AND AND SAID LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOUR POLITICS MEANS MORE TO YOU THAN JESUS CHRIST JESUS WAS LOVE YOU ARE HATE
ALL TRUMPERS LOVE TRUMP MORE THAN OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST KAMALA HARRIS IS A MUCH BETTER PERSON THAN TRUMP SO IS WALZ NO HATE AT KAMALAS RALLY ONLY JOY NOBODY SAID "PUNCH HIM IN THE FACE"
@@coffeebux Excuse me. Are you confusing God, the author of life, who may then take it, as is will dictates ... with the Democrat Party? Who has said anything about hate? --- The core of the problem is that Democrats hate Trump, more than they love their country!
@@MartinCarey-i5xWho embodies hate, the one who points out wrongdoings or the one who supports those who hate people to the point of not giving them the opportunity of being born into the world?
Thank you for speaking up Father!! May St. Michael protect you! Viva Cristo Rey
Amen hallelujah 🙌 🙏
I have no respect for this archbishop in Chicago. He needs to resign from his position. I am a Catholic and so angry by this. 😠
I am so encouraged to see this priest standing against evil. It's time for all Christians who love our Lord to raise our voices!!
Yes, he should stand against men who hire porn stars while their wife is at home, nursing their newborn baby. You can’t be a Catholic and support Trump.
riiiiight…. as if we don’t already hear your complaints
I am a catholic and I am really shocked and ashamed for this archbishop!!!!!
He's the devil in priests clothing.
@@steppenwolfliest3947 God doesn’t want you to be a judge, but to be a witness! Read your Bible and pray for your soul!
@@msizzygirl1 Abortion is murder. And a priest has declare this. And we Christians too. Because Jesus has.given us the spirit of truth.
What are you doing about the satanist pope?
@@msizzygirl1I’m witnessing Catholic people world wide judging the world after the biggest sex abuse scandal the world has ever seen.
You cannot be Catholic or a Christian of ANY denomination and be a Democrat. Thankyou for speaking out, we need more Priests speaking out from the Pulpit. We are to please God not the world. Enough is enough, I agree. 🙏🇺🇸✝️
Neither can you be a Republican
Absolutely 🙏🙏
How dare you-you are a very sick individual.
You can't be Catholic and vote for Trump.
Can I be a catholic and rape women? Can I be a catholic and cheat on my wife? Can I be a catholic and be racist? Stop the hypocrisy! Abortion is wrong so is adultery and rape and cheating other human beings.
Unbelievable for an Archbishop of the Catholic Church to back this immoral party
What about trump who deliberately violated all the Ten Commandments and all Catholic rank and file are kowtowing to him as their golden calf???????????????
@@nevillesaldanha1566 SkyDaddy hates Dump
das ist das grosse Glück das dieser vergewaltiger verbrecher Kinder Schänder nicht von der kirche unterstützt wird der Papst segnet Kamala Harris
@@TrumpCantRead I don’t think I would say It quite like that, but the Bible does say Proverbs 6:16-19 that God does detest trump and those like him!
So you obviously are not a Bible reader! So the immoral party is not the guy that rapes, lies and cheats, commits adultery and goes in pageant dressing rooms to ogle at young girls changing? The immoral party isn’t the party that spews evilness towards all of God’s children, calling them names? The immoral party isn’t the party that lusts after their own child and says he is famous so he can grab any woman’s pus** he wants?
This priest is speaking out against evil and Satan and his earthly name is trump!
That’s why I’m voting for Trump/Vance..it’s a no Brainer..
Thats true
no brain = vote Dump
St. John the Baptist would be screaming from the hills!
As a Catholic I am weeping. As a child of God save my brothers and sisters O Lord.
Very true , so sad ! St. Michael, pray for us and our church!
There is no god
YES ITS WRONG! SHAME on him!
I am totally shocked that Archbishop Cupich would approve of this evilness!
It is political move to appease Pritzker
meaning that Archbishop supports what the Democrat party stands for, disgusting and I hope the catholics stop supporting this archbishop…
It takes courage to be a faithful Catholic. It is not a difficult task for Catholics to vote for Trump.
It is very difficult to ask loving and practicing Catholics to support Trump. It's even sinful to ask such a thing. Trump's evil is of biblical proportion that has crossed the line to denomic. How can any rational Catholic believe he is good for humanity? He is the anti Christ described in Revelation.
I rather not vote than vote for that evil man.
I know everything I will ever need to know about the current Archbishop of Chicago and his moral character.
In my opinion, this man is a member of the "deep church", a judas priest. Please pray for Our Lord's miraculous conversion of Chicago Archbishop Cardinal Blase Cupich.🙏🏽🙏🏿🙏🏻🙏💕✝️
cupich got the BLESSING of the USCCB AND POPE before he did his stunt. It is easy to focus on cupcake, but it goes much deeper!!
Thank you Father, God bless you for speaking Catholic truth
Thank you for speaking out Father!! Our church leaders have failed us at so many levels!
Thank you for speaking out on behalf of ''faithful'' catholics
We absolutely need STRONG Shepherds, NOT wolves in sheep's skin
Yes they have and continually do so, I don’t get it, they’re defying Jesus, truly unbelievable 😢
Keep praying! Amen hallelujah 🙌 🙏
@@doloressabatino9204 man, Dolores I’m like all prayed out, I don’t know what to pray anymore except an end to it all, I’m not enjoying life…
"So, you're stating that you ain't prostitute, but the faithful wife of anonymous trinity of the Husband? I'm so sorry about that unfortunate misunderstanding, ma'am..."
The God sees and remembers everything then there will be the Judgment.
Here is Christ's question,
Mathew 15: 3: "But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?"
Malachi 2: 1-4: "And now, O ye priests, this commandment is for you. If ye will not hear, and if ye will not lay it to heart, to give glory unto my name, saith Jehovah of hosts, then will I send the curse upon you, and I will curse your blessings; yea, I have cursed them already, because ye do not lay it to heart. Behold, I will rebuke your seed, and will spread dung upon your faces, even the dung of your feasts; and ye shall be taken away with it. And ye shall know that I have sent this commandment unto you, that my covenant may be with Levi, saith Jehovah of hosts." (ASV)
A women say "the Husband has no name". Another ones say "the Husband has many names". Some of women "love the Husband in all his manifestations" like: neighbour, taxi driver, coworker, and so forth. Some women in a Husband-fearing way call him "H-D"...
But, all of those prostitutes say "the Husband is the only". Their prostitution has created another women saying "there is no Husband at all".
Then they even talk about "trinity of the Husband" and they are not against "the Son taking the Husband's place".
In the same way religious prostitutes try to hide their disgusting fornication with different gods.
Furthermore, a correct pronunciation of the Name is unknown now. This is the “loyalty” of traitors!
Here is the God's word spoken through Moses,
Deuteronomy 11: 16-17: "Take heed to yourselves, that your heart be not deceived, and ye turn aside, and serve other gods, and worship them; And then the LORD's wrath be kindled against you, and he shut up the heaven, that there be no rain, and that the land yield not her fruit; and lest ye perish quickly from off the good land which the LORD giveth you."
So, the God says there are other gods, but blind leaders of blind lead people into trap.
Names of an idols/false gods are well known: Zeus, Rempha/Chiun, Aurora, Baal, Moloch and many others.
"Jesus" means "Jehovah is salvation". This is the name of Christ real christians are hated for.
"HalleluJah" means "Praze Jah" (Jehovah).
Psalm 83: 18: "That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth." (KJV)
The problem is Devil runs the world. He is liar and murderer. This is the reason why liars feel so good while righteous people are persecuted.
That's why we've got the Gospel about the God's kingdom. Jehovah would put everything in order. He has anointed the king, Jesus Christ. The dead will be resurected and we'll meet our beloved ones again! :-)
The Archbishop should be stripped of his title and banished from the Catholic Church, regardless vengeance is mine alone sayeth the Lord
Thanks Father for protecting the truth.
Yep.
Trump is evil.
Pure evil! God help us.
Thank you Father
I want my CATHOLIC CHURCH BACK
Any priest who associates with Democrats is just part of the problem.
So do I. It’s high time we stepped up. Satan is tireless and we must match his effort. The Lord shall give us strength if we have Faith. Even a bad pope - a monster and a pervert- can’t destroy the Holy Catholic Church.
God bless you Father Daniel 🙏✝️ Amen 🛐 thank you for speaking up on this matter!!!!
I'm a 1st time commenter. So will Fr. Daniel do anything more than a 6min. video? I pray he does.
Bless you Fr. for standing for the TRUTH.
God Bless you father Daniel Thank you for defending our Faith and our comunión with Jesús Christ and Let's us PRAY. against all evil .
Unbelievable!!!! This archbishop MUST be defrocked! He does Not belong to the Catholic faith. What is happening to our faith??? Thanks for sharing this, Father.
Our faith is fine. This guy, although Canonically is considered a successor of one of the Apostles, is more a successor of Bernardin. Call to mind the words of Bishop, and sadly not soon to be Canonized Bishop Fulton J Sheen. The Bishops are the successors of the Apostles. Sadly there are those who are successor of Judas Iscariot.
Won't be defrocked. Is too much a supporter and member of the current power elite. Holds and does what they do. It is a minor miracle that Uncle Ted was supposedly defrocked.
He is a human and has been tempted by evil demons, we must pray that he is awakened from the lure of Satan.
Thank you Father for speaking the truth about are Catholic faith God bless you from Canada 🇨🇦
Not only that, but excommunicated.
Cdl. Cupich could not even bring himself to mention Christ in his secular "prayer". His choice to ignore freely promoted abortions, euthanasia, and vasectomies outside the event was a disgrace and insult to every Christian.
@@BenChokinYou think Jesus would worry about respect? Jesus came to save the lost. Jesus would call this bishop a snake, a viper, a hypocrite. He would tell him, nor do you come to the Father God nor do you let others come. Jesus snapped at the religious leaders for their hypocrisy.
Oh Jesus called shepherds like this blind guides
I'm glad he didn't name Christ in what could easily be deemed as blasphemy
@@BenChokinJesus called the religious leaders of the day vipers and whitewashed sepulchres!
@@BenChokin I agree, we shouldn't set out to offend people, just for the sake of offending them. I don't think that will attract anyone to Christ, however, we can't withhold the message of Christ either! BTW, we're discussing a so-called church leader, not your average lost soul. I was only pointing out that Jesus DID in fact get in people's faces with the truth sometimes, and he wasn't very concerned with how they felt about it.
I totally agree with you Father. Thank you for speaking out.
This archbishop needs to be removed.
You are right And excommunication
Rebuke his actions
Thank you Father for your kind, courageous & honest words.
Amen thank you for saying what needs to be said. All Catholics need to hear this. This is your soul.
Thank you Fr. Daniel. You are indeed to be praised for your stand against Cardinal Cupich.
When it’s convenient demoncrats don’t talk about “the separation of church and state”.
Yet, he will NOT be removed. Shame.
What did he do that is wrong? Praying?
Each one of us, including priests, are free and responsible for our actions. We shouldn't judge . Though I agree his participation at the DNC is disturbing we should pray for the Church and all Christians. We are in a spiritual war and we need strong and faithful leaders.
@@nemodor139We should judge the actions as this causes scandal to the faithful. Not offering fraternal correction is why we are in the mess we are in.
@@geoffreyk6229Fraternizing with the express enemy of God. Causing scandal to the faithful. Mocking God and his church.
Attending the DemonicRAT convention which supports infanticude.
As a life long practicing Catholic I am appalled and ashamed that any Catholic priest, yet alone an Archbishop, would attend the DNC. That archbishop should be ashamed and disciplined by the Pope. He did not speak about the value of life. I feel sorry for Catholics in the Chicago area. I have no respect for this archbishop.
Outrageous 😢. O God please be our strength against so much evil 🙏.
Thank you Father! I’ll be praying for all bishops and priests
@@jesuscortez3107 ah prayer… the absolute LEAST you can do about anything
. Actually, for TRUE BELIEVERS, PRAY IS THE HIGHEST and MOST POWERFUL OF ACTIONS. May you come to have stronger faith 🙏 praying for you, too
Thank you Father for a video that points out how bad the situation is getting. These are wolves in shepherd’s clothing. It is so sad that these men, which are supposed to be taking us to God are actually diverting us to the devil. Definitely we need to pray for them to find God once again. True God, not this world’s god.
Isn’t Cupich corrupt anyway. Because if he wasn’t, he wouldn’t be there. Truly, truly sad.
He's satanic.
Thank you Father for speaking the truth.❤
Thank you father!!!
May God bless you Father Daniel.
May Archangel Michael defend us in battle!
That Archbishop is wrong in promoting a Dem party which approves abortion. This priest reporting is absolutely right, he is a courageous leader.
Yes Father, I stand with you. I pray for all our leaders that they completely focus on the Father, Son, & Holy Spirit and do GOD’S WILL. Amen 🙏🏻❤️🙏🏻
I have been praying for Cardinal Blasé Cupich for a long time, for him to return to the true Catholic faith. 🙏
This has been predicted in several Marion apparitions! Priests and Bishops will lead people down the road to perdition!!! And now it’s happening right in front of everyone!!
Christ have mercy!!
For the sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us and the whole world!!!
I'm heartbroken but not surprised. 🙏🙏 Hope you're well Fr Daniel.
Thank you Father Daniel. Brave Priests like you are needed. Lillian from Western Canada.
I miss the old days when "Is the pope Catholic?" was an answer and not a question.
yes this came to me a few days ago....sad eh!!
He is, whether you like it or not. Sorry, but you don’t get to decide!
@@thomaschacko6320Pope is an antichrist. Whether you like it or not.
Bergoglio is neither real pope (see for example ruclips.net/video/8QIdUK-1aFU/видео.html) nor catholic nor christian and Cupich is part of antipope entourage in the service of big finance. Big finance controls everything (Vatican, politicians, judges, police, media, star system, culture, ...) and wants to destroy Christian identity and traditional family because the are the greatest obstacle to full control over people. Muslim immigrants in Europe are part of the plan (also to exploit the resulting riots in order to impose a de facto dictatorship). Read GK Chesterton. Some quotes:
The crimes of England, 1916: "The libel law [is] now used, not to crush lies about private life, but to crush truths about public life."
What's wrong with the world, 1910: "In the quarrel earlier alluded to between the energetic Progressive and the obstinate Conservative (or, to talk a tenderer language, between Hudge and Gudge), the state of cross-purposes is at the present moment acute. The Tory says he wants to preserve family life in Cindertown; the Socialist very reasonably points out to him that in Cindertown at present there isn't any family life to preserve. But Hudge, the Socialist, in his turn, is highly vague and mysterious about whether he would preserve the family life if there were any; or whether he will try to restore it where it has disappeared. It is all very confusing. The Tory sometimes talks as if he wanted to tighten the domestic bonds that do not exist; the Socialist as if he wanted to loosen the bonds that do not bind anybody. The question we all want to ask of both of them is the original ideal question, "Do you want to keep the family at all?" If Hudge, the Socialist, does want the family he must be prepared for the natural restraints, distinctions and divisions of labor in the family. He must brace himself up to bear the idea of the woman having a preference for the private house and a man for the public house. He must manage to endure somehow the idea of a woman being womanly, which does not mean soft and yielding, but handy, thrifty, rather hard, and very humorous. He must confront without a quiver the notion of a child who shall be childish, that is, full of energy, but without an idea of independence; fundamentally as eager for authority as for information and butter-scotch. If a man, a woman and a child live together any more in free and sovereign households, these ancient relations will recur; and Hudge must put up with it. He can only avoid it by destroying the family, driving both sexes into sexless hives and hordes, and bringing up all children as the children of the state--like Oliver Twist. But if these stern words must be addressed to Hudge, neither shall Gudge escape a somewhat severe admonition. For the plain truth to be told pretty sharply to the Tory is this, that if he wants the family to remain, if he wants to be strong enough to resist the rending forces of our essentially savage commerce, he must make some very big sacrifices and try to equalize property. The overwhelming mass of the English people at this particular instant are simply too poor to be domestic. They are as domestic as they can manage; they are much more domestic than the governing class; but they cannot get what good there was originally meant to be in this institution, simply because they have not got enough money. The man ought to stand for a certain magnanimity, quite lawfully expressed in throwing money away: but if under given circumstances he can only do it by throwing the week's food away, then he is not magnanimous, but mean. The woman ought to stand for a certain wisdom which is well expressed in valuing things rightly and guarding money sensibly; but how is she to guard money if there is no money to guard? The child ought to look on his mother as a fountain of natural fun and poetry; but how can he unless the fountain, like other fountains, is allowed to play? What chance have any of these ancient arts and functions in a house so hideously topsy-turvy; a house where the woman is out working and the man isn't; and the child is forced by law to think his schoolmaster's requirements more important than his mother's? No, Gudge and his friends in the House of Lords and the Carlton Club must make up their minds on this matter, and that very quickly. If they are content to have England turned into a beehive and an ant-hill, decorated here and there with a few faded butterflies playing at an old game called domesticity in the intervals of the divorce court, then let them have their empire of insects; they will find plenty of Socialists who will give it to them. But if they want a domestic England, they must "shell out," as the phrase goes, to a vastly greater extent than any Radical politician has yet dared to suggest; they must endure burdens much heavier than the Budget and strokes much deadlier than the death duties; for the thing to be done is nothing more nor less than the distribution of the great fortunes and the great estates. We can now only avoid Socialism by a change as vast as Socialism. If we are to save property, we must distribute property, almost as sternly and sweepingly as did the French Revolution. If we are to preserve the family we must revolutionize the nation. ...
The superstition of divorce, 1920: "It is exceedingly characteristic of the dreary decades before the War that the forms of freedom in which they seemed to specialise were suicide and divorce. I am not at the moment pronouncing on the moral problem of either; I am merely noting, as signs of those times, those two true or false counsels of despair; the end of life and the end of love. Other forms of freedom were being increasingly curtailed. Freedom indeed was the one thing that progressives and conservatives alike contemned. Socialists were largely concerned to prevent strikes, by State arbitration; that is, by adding another rich man to give the casting vote between rich and poor. Even in claiming what they called the right to work they tacitly surrendered the right to leave off working. Tories were preaching conscription, not so much to defend the independence of England as to destroy the independence of Englishmen. Liberals, of course, were chiefly interested in eliminating liberty, especially touching beer and betting. It was wicked to fight, and unsafe even to argue; for citing any certain and contemporary fact might land one in a libel action. As all these doors were successfully shut in our faces along the chilly and cheerless corridor of progress (with its glazed tiles) the doors of death and divorce alone stood open, or rather opened wider and wider. ... As we have already seen papers and public men to-day make a vast parade of the necessity of setting the poor man free to get a divorce. Now why are they so mortally anxious that he should be free to get a divorce, and not in the least anxious that he should be free to get anything else? ... The answer is, I regret to say, that this social campaign, in most though by no means all of its most prominent campaigners, relies in this matter on a very smug and pestilent piece of chalk. There are some advocates of democratic divorce who are really advocates of general democratic freedom; but they are the exceptions; I might say, with all respect, that they are the dupes. The omnipresence of the thing in the press and in political society is due to a motive precisely opposite to the motive professed. The modern rulers, who are simply the rich men, are really quite consistent in their attitude to the poor man. It is the same spirit which takes away his children under the pretence of order, which takes away his wife under the pretence of liberty. That which wishes, in the words of the comic song, to break up the happy home, is primarily anxious not to break up the much more unhappy factory. Capitalism, of course, is at war with the family, for the same reason which has led to its being at war with the Trade Union. This indeed is the only sense in which it is true that capitalism is connected with individualism. Capitalism believes in collectivism for itself and individualism for its enemies. It desires its victims to be individuals, or (in other words) to be atoms. For the word atom, in its clearest meaning (which is none too clear) might be translated as "individual." If there be any bond, if there be any brotherhood, if there be any class loyalty or domestic discipline, by which the poor can help the poor, these emancipators will certainly strive to loosen that bond or lift that discipline in the most liberal fashion. If there be such a brotherhood, these individualists will redistribute it in the form of individuals; or in other words smash it to atoms. The masters of modern plutocracy know what they are about. They are making no mistake; they can be cleared of the slander of inconsistency. A very profound and precise instinct has let them to single out the human household as the chief obstacle to their inhuman progress. Without the family we are helpless before the State, which in our modern case is the Servile State. To use a military metaphor, the family is the only formation in which the charge of the rich can be repulsed. It is a force that forms twos as soldiers form fours; and, in every peasant country, has stood in the square house or the square plot of land as infantry have stood in squares against cavalry. How this force operates this, and why, I will try to explain in the last of these articles. But it is when it is most nearly ridden down by the horsemen of pride and privilege, as in Poland or Ireland, when the battle grows most desperate and the hope most dark, that men begin to understand why that wild oath in its beginnings was flung beyond the bonds of the world; and what would seem as passing as a vision is made permanent as a vow."(see for example ruclips.net/video/8QIdUK-1aFU/видео.html)
Bergoglio is neither real pope (see for example ruclips.net/video/8QIdUK-1aFU/видео.html) nor catholic nor christian. Cupich is part of antipope entourage in the service of big finance. Big finance controls everything (Vatican, politicians, judges, police, media, star system, culture, ...) and wants to destroy Christian identity and traditional family because the are the greatest obstacle to full control over people. Muslim immigrants in Europe are part of the plan (also to exploit the resulting riots in order to impose a de facto dictatorship). Read GK Chesterton. Some quotes:
The crimes of England, 1916: "The libel law [is] now used, not to crush lies about private life, but to crush truths about public life."
What's wrong with the world, 1910: "In the quarrel earlier alluded to between the energetic Progressive and the obstinate Conservative (or, to talk a tenderer language, between Hudge and Gudge), the state of cross-purposes is at the present moment acute. The Tory says he wants to preserve family life in Cindertown; the Socialist very reasonably points out to him that in Cindertown at present there isn't any family life to preserve. But Hudge, the Socialist, in his turn, is highly vague and mysterious about whether he would preserve the family life if there were any; or whether he will try to restore it where it has disappeared. It is all very confusing. The Tory sometimes talks as if he wanted to tighten the domestic bonds that do not exist; the Socialist as if he wanted to loosen the bonds that do not bind anybody. The question we all want to ask of both of them is the original ideal question, "Do you want to keep the family at all?" If Hudge, the Socialist, does want the family he must be prepared for the natural restraints, distinctions and divisions of labor in the family. He must brace himself up to bear the idea of the woman having a preference for the private house and a man for the public house. He must manage to endure somehow the idea of a woman being womanly, which does not mean soft and yielding, but handy, thrifty, rather hard, and very humorous. He must confront without a quiver the notion of a child who shall be childish, that is, full of energy, but without an idea of independence; fundamentally as eager for authority as for information and butter-scotch. If a man, a woman and a child live together any more in free and sovereign households, these ancient relations will recur; and Hudge must put up with it. He can only avoid it by destroying the family, driving both sexes into sexless hives and hordes, and bringing up all children as the children of the state--like Oliver Twist. But if these stern words must be addressed to Hudge, neither shall Gudge escape a somewhat severe admonition. For the plain truth to be told pretty sharply to the Tory is this, that if he wants the family to remain, if he wants to be strong enough to resist the rending forces of our essentially savage commerce, he must make some very big sacrifices and try to equalize property. The overwhelming mass of the English people at this particular instant are simply too poor to be domestic. They are as domestic as they can manage; they are much more domestic than the governing class; but they cannot get what good there was originally meant to be in this institution, simply because they have not got enough money. The man ought to stand for a certain magnanimity, quite lawfully expressed in throwing money away: but if under given circumstances he can only do it by throwing the week's food away, then he is not magnanimous, but mean. The woman ought to stand for a certain wisdom which is well expressed in valuing things rightly and guarding money sensibly; but how is she to guard money if there is no money to guard? The child ought to look on his mother as a fountain of natural fun and poetry; but how can he unless the fountain, like other fountains, is allowed to play? What chance have any of these ancient arts and functions in a house so hideously topsy-turvy; a house where the woman is out working and the man isn't; and the child is forced by law to think his schoolmaster's requirements more important than his mother's? No, Gudge and his friends in the House of Lords and the Carlton Club must make up their minds on this matter, and that very quickly. If they are content to have England turned into a beehive and an ant-hill, decorated here and there with a few faded butterflies playing at an old game called domesticity in the intervals of the divorce court, then let them have their empire of insects; they will find plenty of Socialists who will give it to them. But if they want a domestic England, they must "shell out," as the phrase goes, to a vastly greater extent than any Radical politician has yet dared to suggest; they must endure burdens much heavier than the Budget and strokes much deadlier than the death duties; for the thing to be done is nothing more nor less than the distribution of the great fortunes and the great estates. We can now only avoid Socialism by a change as vast as Socialism. If we are to save property, we must distribute property, almost as sternly and sweepingly as did the French Revolution. If we are to preserve the family we must revolutionize the nation. ...
The superstition of divorce, 1920: "It is exceedingly characteristic of the dreary decades before the War that the forms of freedom in which they seemed to specialise were suicide and divorce. I am not at the moment pronouncing on the moral problem of either; I am merely noting, as signs of those times, those two true or false counsels of despair; the end of life and the end of love. Other forms of freedom were being increasingly curtailed. Freedom indeed was the one thing that progressives and conservatives alike contemned. Socialists were largely concerned to prevent strikes, by State arbitration; that is, by adding another rich man to give the casting vote between rich and poor. Even in claiming what they called the right to work they tacitly surrendered the right to leave off working. Tories were preaching conscription, not so much to defend the independence of England as to destroy the independence of Englishmen. Liberals, of course, were chiefly interested in eliminating liberty, especially touching beer and betting. It was wicked to fight, and unsafe even to argue; for citing any certain and contemporary fact might land one in a libel action. As all these doors were successfully shut in our faces along the chilly and cheerless corridor of progress (with its glazed tiles) the doors of death and divorce alone stood open, or rather opened wider and wider. ... As we have already seen papers and public men to-day make a vast parade of the necessity of setting the poor man free to get a divorce. Now why are they so mortally anxious that he should be free to get a divorce, and not in the least anxious that he should be free to get anything else? ... The answer is, I regret to say, that this social campaign, in most though by no means all of its most prominent campaigners, relies in this matter on a very smug and pestilent piece of chalk. There are some advocates of democratic divorce who are really advocates of general democratic freedom; but they are the exceptions; I might say, with all respect, that they are the dupes. The omnipresence of the thing in the press and in political society is due to a motive precisely opposite to the motive professed. The modern rulers, who are simply the rich men, are really quite consistent in their attitude to the poor man. It is the same spirit which takes away his children under the pretence of order, which takes away his wife under the pretence of liberty. That which wishes, in the words of the comic song, to break up the happy home, is primarily anxious not to break up the much more unhappy factory. Capitalism, of course, is at war with the family, for the same reason which has led to its being at war with the Trade Union. This indeed is the only sense in which it is true that capitalism is connected with individualism. Capitalism believes in collectivism for itself and individualism for its enemies. It desires its victims to be individuals, or (in other words) to be atoms. For the word atom, in its clearest meaning (which is none too clear) might be translated as "individual." If there be any bond, if there be any brotherhood, if there be any class loyalty or domestic discipline, by which the poor can help the poor, these emancipators will certainly strive to loosen that bond or lift that discipline in the most liberal fashion. If there be such a brotherhood, these individualists will redistribute it in the form of individuals; or in other words smash it to atoms. The masters of modern plutocracy know what they are about. They are making no mistake; they can be cleared of the slander of inconsistency. A very profound and precise instinct has let them to single out the human household as the chief obstacle to their inhuman progress. Without the family we are helpless before the State, which in our modern case is the Servile State. To use a military metaphor, the family is the only formation in which the charge of the rich can be repulsed. It is a force that forms twos as soldiers form fours; and, in every peasant country, has stood in the square house or the square plot of land as infantry have stood in squares against cavalry. How this force operates this, and why, I will try to explain in the last of these articles. But it is when it is most nearly ridden down by the horsemen of pride and privilege, as in Poland or Ireland, when the battle grows most desperate and the hope most dark, that men begin to understand why that wild oath in its beginnings was flung beyond the bonds of the world; and what would seem as passing as a vision is made permanent as a vow."
Thank you! We need to all come together and pray to God for the healing of people and for our country!
THIS IS TOTALLY HORRENDOUS! Woe to him! Cupich is faithless!
Steady. Offering the opening prayer doesn’t mean he endorses their position on abortion. They are in his city. 🌆
@@aclark903 Stop it! If he is truly faithful to God, there is no way he should be anywhere near that demonic place! Abortions are happening close by & a Cardinal of the Catholic Church even dares to be in that vicinity! You’re the problem as much as he is!
@@aclark903 he didn't have to attend.
@@aclark903, or he could have refused until Kamala-Tim and all the political actors there at the DNC abandoned the support of the slaughter of the unborn and wow to eradicate it from the USA; or he (Cupich) could have threatened excommunication to all of them Catholics (like Pelosi and Biden) according to cannons #1364, #751 and #1398
But, yeah, Cupich serves anything but our Lord Jesus Christ and, like him, many bishops today...my opinion.
Indeed
Amen Father! Be vigilant. We are at war and we need to win for the sake of our souls and the souls of our children! 🙏
We need courageous bishops and archbishops. They need to take a stand and lead the parishioners to do what is right. I love my Catholic faith and will stand up for truth and Jesus, God and the Holy Spirit. Please join me in praying rosaries each and every day for them.
I agree. Throwing around vitriolic attacks does not bring anyone to the truth.
Saddens me as a man of faith to see our Christian leadership unwilling to speak against the secular evil in this world. Thank you father for speaking up on this. Let us pray for Jesus flock to stand strong against the evil of this world.
Thank you father for telling us the truth
Unfortunate that the Cardinal did not denounce the Planned Parenthood van offering free abortions and vasectomies. That would have been courageous.
@user-kv3jj9hb7i - Are you kidding? you expect Cupich to be courageous. Is that a joke?
Thank you Father for such great clarity. Your message gives us hope.
Thank you, Father!
Thank you for speaking up for the DNC actions
I’m not a Catholic, I’m a Baptist, but I totally agree brother!!!!!
Thank you Father!!
President Trump had no wars. LOWER food and gas prices. Peace and a strong military. Vote Trump.
"Enough is Enough" That's for sure in God's Mighty Hands!!!
To your prayers, AMEN!!!
I’m not catholic but thank you for standing up for families.
I am not a Catholic, but it is time stand against wickedness.
The Devil working overtime
So sad to see that Archbishop of Chicago, one of the favorite archbishops of pope Francis. As a Catholic I am sick of this.
Don't think Bergoglio doesn't know what Cupich is doing.
Shameful
Sad.
Where is the Catholic Church going.
Please God save us.
Yes , we need to do it ! God bless us !
So ashamed of Cupich…. It’s cowardice and lukewarmness….
He is more than that he has lost the faith
It's EVIL.
Thank you Father! Cardinal Cupich should be ashamed of himself.
Yes we are so tired. So many Catholics voting for pro abortion candidates because of things like this
Evil, pure evil!
Thank you Father for speaking up for the Catholic Church! God bless you and keep you safe.🙏✝️🩵🙏
Thank you for speaking the clear truth for all Christians!! Blessings. Carl and Leann.
It’s not a surprise to me. He’s something else….we need to pray for his conversion! This should be our Catholic response to this.
Thank you father! We are praying for you and the ones who stand up the true teaching of the Church.
@@nonoyporio2585 God needs money!
Fr Daniel, you have said it all. We pray for you and your message! Amen!!
Thank you father for speaking out. I am ashamed at the archBishopbut I will pray for him for convertion.
Thank God for such men who will not compromise. Let's us stand up against evil and the truth be accepted.
Thanks for your great example and strength!!!
Holy Spirit, please give us the words and strength to speak up against all evil
Thank you Father for speaking up for the True morality of Catholic faith ❤👶✝️ The Shepherds who are standing against Christ, will have to answer to God 😢
Such a desecration of our Faith by Cupich! 😢 This DNC culture is no better than the Olympic culture. May God have Mercy on America!
Very soon I believe
Wake up people bidenomics ain't working, we need a strong leader trump may have his faults, but use your heads, what will cacklema do when nuclear war threatens, trump was respected by putin, and kim jong
Or the leaded of china
Leader of china i meant
Sinners that we are, we should always defend our Catholic faith before we swear allegiance to any political party.
Thank you FATHER.YES,we need to Stand up against the divel.
May God bless you Father for your courage and witness.
Dear Lord, may your enemies meet your justice and then find peace. Amen
Thank you for speaking out, Father. We need clarity in these times. Bishops, archbishops, cardinals and even the pope sow seeds of confusion. Thank you, Father. God have mercy on us and on His church.
AMEN. COME HOLY SPIRIT, COME.
As a Catholic I am ashamed of this heretic Archbishop.
So well said - the Catholic Church needs to be more vocal
PRAY!!! Pray hard for Cupich!!! He is on the road to perdition and leading many down that road. He will be held accountable for all of it. He has lost his way and i pray Jesus will show him His face and remind him of the vows he took for Jesus and His Church!! Lord have mercy 🙏
As a Catholic and an evangelical Christian, I cannot understand how this man of the cloth can speak in this manner to a group that advocates for the extermination of the unborn - AND have a mobile abortion/vasectomy clinic as part of the convention offerings. There are no words.
Km
Doesn't a vasectomy eliminate the need for an abortion?
I'm just saying the people writing the Bible thought the sun revolved around the earth. We have come a long way since then.
Maybe the Bible shouldn't be used to dictate our medical decisions?
@@coffeebux It’s not the vasectomies so much as the ABORTIONS. Deflection is a typical tool of the enemy.
I seem to remember Someone who ate with sinners and called religious leaders white washed sepulcres. Can't imagine anything more like Him than accepting an invitation to pray. Thankful for our Bishops who have the courage to respond to the call to be present and pray wherever they're called. Mother Mary please crush this divisive spirit who seeks to turn us against each other and the mission of preaching the good news to ALL
God bless you Fr. Klimek ❤ thank you for this essential video. To go back to our faith: "I am the Lord your God. You shall have no other gods beside me." Including the deceptive and false promises of corrupt leaders in this world.
The faithful will follow the faithful Shepherds of the Gospel
AMEN, Thank you Father Daniel