Amazing Footage From a Nuclear Power Plant Construction

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 янв 2025

Комментарии •

  • @skymaster4121
    @skymaster4121 Год назад +71

    “How much steel do you need?”
    “Yes”

  • @-Hercules-
    @-Hercules- Год назад +22

    Would you like a side order of concrete to go with your steel?

  • @VM-MAX
    @VM-MAX Год назад +20

    I've detailed Nuclear reactors. That's not the answer but the bars are all scheduled and bent and cut according to the schedule. These bars here are mainly coupled rather than lapped. There is a definitive answer when the schedules are all accumulated and it is a huge amount. GBS oil platforms like Hibernia there's even more.

  • @CrackedFemboy
    @CrackedFemboy 2 месяца назад +5

    steel is a good thermal absorbing and dispursing material good for holding concrete in cooling towers too

  • @drago4803
    @drago4803 Год назад +4

    Me here trying to find how to dribble basketball at home without creating noise

  • @techteam3923
    @techteam3923 Год назад +2

    And wolverine cuts it in half

  • @millertime7915
    @millertime7915 Год назад +2

    I prefer geothermal but then again I'm still waiting for California to fall into the ocean

  • @haunong2637
    @haunong2637 6 дней назад

    HOW BIG IS THE REACTOR

  • @alexsuleta2305
    @alexsuleta2305 20 дней назад

    Lol I dropped my phone boss

  • @SyberSqueegy
    @SyberSqueegy Год назад +1

    More steel than concrete.

  • @slayerofthhots314
    @slayerofthhots314 17 дней назад

    Are they putting sand underneath it?

  • @brandonhenderson322
    @brandonhenderson322 Месяц назад

    This has to be vogtle 3 and 4.

  • @uwuwuewuewueunjetjemuwueub2385
    @uwuwuewuewueunjetjemuwueub2385 7 дней назад

    Insane

  • @katyarkhukri7003
    @katyarkhukri7003 Год назад +2

    40000 tonnes all considered, SS at that

    • @damodaraomalley3974
      @damodaraomalley3974 4 месяца назад

      It's not ss

    • @stickjohnny
      @stickjohnny 2 месяца назад

      ​@@damodaraomalley3974 Are you sure? It doesn't look much different than regular rebar other than always being clean.

  • @KingMidas281
    @KingMidas281 Год назад +1

    Good luck taking it down in a few years.

  • @ajd0101
    @ajd0101 2 месяца назад

    damn so Chernobyl were prob all busted up, if not melted.. unless it didnt use steel like that..

  • @WassermeloneCat
    @WassermeloneCat Месяц назад

    I guess its kinda propaganda material, but damn gotta give it to the Chinese they went all out with safety (unlike the soviets)

  • @KrystylSummers-ho8he
    @KrystylSummers-ho8he Год назад

    What country am I in again?

  • @АнтонВерещагин-х6л

    Приятный масштаб.

  • @damodaraomalley3974
    @damodaraomalley3974 Месяц назад

    Just poor a steel cast and leave out the mud

  • @terywetherlow7970
    @terywetherlow7970 Год назад +2

    How many are currently leaking?

  • @MemeRider
    @MemeRider 2 месяца назад

    The Gospel
    Jesus Christ loves you and died, rose from the dead, and ascended to heaven to pay for your sin! Repent and turn to Him and you will walk in light and be saved. Read the book of John and Luke to see God's love for you!

  • @КирилКамбуров
    @КирилКамбуров Год назад

    ❤Недостижими..!!!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
    *Диви...Котаци*...!!!
    УСПЕХ..!!!

  • @Feinrizulwur
    @Feinrizulwur Год назад

    Wrong question.
    Its about a LWR, only one very inefficient and old type allowed by big fossil.
    New safe and very efficient nuclear is. not allowed so we dont talk about it.

  • @christinegracejohn
    @christinegracejohn Год назад

    😮😮