[LIVE #15] New Laravel VS Code Extension, URI Parsing, and more...

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 дек 2024

Комментарии • 11

  • @getupkid84
    @getupkid84 13 дней назад

    Tbh, I've always steered clear of PHPStorm. It is super resource intensive. Way too many bells and whistles. I've always preferred VSCode even for PHP. Looking forward to using this extension.

  • @object-orientedprograming6709
    @object-orientedprograming6709 14 дней назад

    We need a theme extension to make the code as the code in docs

  • @fhoulbr
    @fhoulbr 14 дней назад +2

    For me it is still PHPStorm ;)

  • @sean_reyes
    @sean_reyes 14 дней назад

    is the vs-code extension open-source?

  • @isaachatilima
    @isaachatilima 14 дней назад

    Is it better than Laravel idea on phpstorm?

    • @adisonmasih
      @adisonmasih 14 дней назад +1

      no. and i doubt it will ever be; laravel idea even supports livewire, volt, flux, inertia and much more libraries compared to this. but considering laravel idea and phpstorm are paid products, the vs code extension is promising.

    • @edism
      @edism 14 дней назад

      Yes you need to support every front end adaptor library including those you don't use ​@@adisonmasih

    • @adisonmasih
      @adisonmasih 14 дней назад

      ​@@edism not sure if what you meant was sarcasm, but if it was, just want to say that livewire and inertia are probably one of, if not the most used libraries inside the laravel ecosystem. not including them in the vs code extension is not a wise choice if you wanna compete with laravel idea in future.

    • @edism
      @edism 14 дней назад

      @@adisonmasih if you let popularity validate your stack then why not use next on Vercel? Eg. If you're using inertia in your project you're not going to need volt etc.

  • @etiennez0r846
    @etiennez0r846 14 дней назад +1

    I need the tl; dr 🥲
    also would be good to know more details on your composer commands