Question for whoever can answer it. The rules do not go over each location for side B. Most of them are self-explanatory except for the Barracks. In this video the G.B.G The Barracks side B gives you 3 points for each guy you have in three different locations. The card iconography seems to suggest this too, however on-site A you get three points for every person you attack to whom your attack was successful against. So, does side B stil have attack? It has to because the card still says attack on it. So, I take this to mean: You get three points for every player you attack to whom your attack was successful and in addition you get three for those other two locations.. is this correct?
Fantastic job explaining this game. This one has been on my mind, but I'm not sure it really scratches an itch. I already have the game "Behind the Throne" which I enjoy and has similarities to this game regarding a card tableau with each having a special ability. I like the card selection with meeples too, not used enough in my opinion in games, I think Firenze has that mech. Game honestly doesn't remind me of Splendor. But overall I'm not excited in the replayability with the base cards. Switching the cards is Ok, but honestly I don't like constantly adjusting 'the rules' of games... maybe I don't like to think that much in general or maybe it's just I like to dig into one set of rules and not constantly tweek/fiddle.
![Kumamoto Masters Japan 2024 | Gregoria Mariska Tunjung (INA) [5] vs. Akane Yamaguchi (JPN) [2] | F](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EIjZybhsWqA/mqdefault.jpg)
It's a really great little game. I think I would put it right on par with Splendor, and both of them a step or two above Century Spice Road.
Question for whoever can answer it.
The rules do not go over each location for side B. Most of them are self-explanatory except for the Barracks. In this video the G.B.G The Barracks side B gives you 3 points for each guy you have in three different locations. The card iconography seems to suggest this too, however on-site A you get three points for every person you attack to whom your attack was successful against. So, does side B stil have attack? It has to because the card still says attack on it. So, I take this to mean: You get three points for every player you attack to whom your attack was successful and in addition you get three for those other two locations.. is this correct?
Fantastic job explaining this game. This one has been on my mind, but I'm not sure it really scratches an itch. I already have the game "Behind the Throne" which I enjoy and has similarities to this game regarding a card tableau with each having a special ability. I like the card selection with meeples too, not used enough in my opinion in games, I think Firenze has that mech. Game honestly doesn't remind me of Splendor. But overall I'm not excited in the replayability with the base cards. Switching the cards is Ok, but honestly I don't like constantly adjusting 'the rules' of games... maybe I don't like to think that much in general or maybe it's just I like to dig into one set of rules and not constantly tweek/fiddle.
What is that music in the background??
Nice
Splendor is the better game, it has more control over Majesty. Definitely more strategic.