Special report: Supreme Court upholds domestic violence gun restriction

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 70

  • @Dont.Call.Me.Tall.
    @Dont.Call.Me.Tall. 4 месяца назад +8

    I mean, I feel like that decision should be obvious for everyone... Except Clarence.

    • @mostlypeacefuljogger4622
      @mostlypeacefuljogger4622 4 месяца назад +2

      Restraining orders are not convictions

    • @Dont.Call.Me.Tall.
      @Dont.Call.Me.Tall. 4 месяца назад +1

      @@mostlypeacefuljogger4622 no one should ve armed while those tempers are flairing.

    • @mostlypeacefuljogger4622
      @mostlypeacefuljogger4622 4 месяца назад +1

      @@Dont.Call.Me.Tall. still needs due process. Maybe don’t let criminals out so they can commit more crimes.

    • @Dont.Call.Me.Tall.
      @Dont.Call.Me.Tall. 4 месяца назад +1

      @@mostlypeacefuljogger4622 where is Donald Trump's rant like that?

    • @mostlypeacefuljogger4622
      @mostlypeacefuljogger4622 4 месяца назад

      @@Dont.Call.Me.Tall. what does this have to do with Donald Trump? Is everything about him or do you have no ability to argue and must default to orang man bad? If you want to play politics, where are all the leftists that claim the Conservative justices would destroy the court and rule down party lines like the liberal justices? A restraining order isn’t a conviction and it’s just an accusation. You need to have due process and that’s what the 5th Amendment is for.

  • @erinblaxkBXNY5
    @erinblaxkBXNY5 4 месяца назад +2

    Bs

  • @TheMauf
    @TheMauf 4 месяца назад +2

    Thomas…….do us all a favor. Strike a deal to not be prosecuted for anything and then retire.

  • @MG-jj3pn
    @MG-jj3pn 4 месяца назад +3

    Finally

  • @shannonfreeman1
    @shannonfreeman1 4 месяца назад

    Good!!

  • @user-zx6lf5so4w
    @user-zx6lf5so4w 4 месяца назад +2

    Really doesn't make a difference , you can still obtain a firearm illegally

  • @Voltaire-b8p
    @Voltaire-b8p 4 месяца назад +7

    Bad ruling. You cannot have your rights taken without proper due process

    • @mostlypeacefuljogger4622
      @mostlypeacefuljogger4622 4 месяца назад +3

      Exactly and they can be issued without evidence

    • @deanromanado5850
      @deanromanado5850 4 месяца назад +2

      They do that with asset forfeiture for years and no one seems to care ( and with asset forfeiture, they don't even have to accuse you of a crime ).

    • @mostlypeacefuljogger4622
      @mostlypeacefuljogger4622 4 месяца назад +3

      @@deanromanado5850 many people care but there is still due process

    • @MG-jj3pn
      @MG-jj3pn 4 месяца назад +3

      You need to learn how laws work.

    • @nickf2170
      @nickf2170 4 месяца назад +3

      @@MG-jj3pn I know exactly how that law works. Every man in my engineering department had this happen to him. Can't gaslight people who lived it.

  • @RobustArid379
    @RobustArid379 4 месяца назад +2

    Its not a weapon, its a tool for sports

  • @williamhartz8707
    @williamhartz8707 4 месяца назад +2

    Clarence doesn’t want to lose his perks from the gun folks.

  • @emeraldforcier14
    @emeraldforcier14 4 месяца назад

    Uh oh, I guess SCOTUS wasn’t given enough gifts.

  • @nickf2170
    @nickf2170 4 месяца назад +3

    What the average person doesn't realize, is that the court reqiures ZERO proof of ANY threat or so called violence against the women. All the women has to do is CLAIM it, and a "protective order" is granted against the husband or boyfriend. So now you WILL lose your rights for literally nothing more than a claim. The order also automatically bans the man from even going back to live in his own house. Lawyers routinely suggest to women that they file a protective order, for the mere fact that there is no defense against it. This is a very real reason not to get involved with women AT ALL. They will absolutely use this against you.

    • @danielmakinde-v9k
      @danielmakinde-v9k 4 месяца назад +1

      exactly, it would be abused

    • @melissabruhn1429
      @melissabruhn1429 4 месяца назад +1

      Citation? Complete mischaracterization. Protective Orders and conditions are under scrutiny of court not handed out summarily.

    • @nickf2170
      @nickf2170 4 месяца назад +1

      @@melissabruhn1429 They are not handed out summarily, they are GRANTED SUMMARILY by the family law court. Fact. And with no more proof than a claim.

    • @davidgoff357
      @davidgoff357 4 месяца назад +1

      Exactly true been there done that.

  • @derekyonekura5509
    @derekyonekura5509 4 месяца назад +5

    Uncle Clarence Tom dissents? Figures....

    • @leonblack2651
      @leonblack2651 4 месяца назад +1

      You just gotta cry don't you?

    • @mostlypeacefuljogger4622
      @mostlypeacefuljogger4622 4 месяца назад +1

      Because he’s the only Constitutionalist. Restraining orders are not convictions and a violation of your 5th Amendment

  • @rochellereif8421
    @rochellereif8421 4 месяца назад +4

    Vote Joe Biden Democrat 2024
    Please vote Democrat

  • @Simplyhere85
    @Simplyhere85 4 месяца назад

    I understand suspending but permanently is not acceptable. If a person who commits road rage, or someone who has dwi can get their license back than so to should a person who has made a mistake. This isnt about protecting this about control

  • @tjiamlivingalone1397
    @tjiamlivingalone1397 4 месяца назад +1

    Yes, it is a calculated war against men and against the family

  • @888JesusChrist
    @888JesusChrist 4 месяца назад

    Yes please. Please also ban them from mandatory military service or military draft as that would mean they would have to carry weapons such as guns. And they could bring those guns back home and who knows what they'll do.