Hegel Against Kant: Being and Essence

This video should serve as an overview on the metaphysical movement of Kant to Hegel. I also discuss Zizek’s Hegel at the end.
The main ideas:
-Thing-in-itself is the culmination of universal abstract negations.
-All objects have a limit in themselves and that limit posits an other.
-We live in a world of appearance: objects do not have essence in themselves. Their essence is their reflection-in-itself through the other which reflects-in-another.

[@dissatisfiedphilosophy]

Check out the Telosbound discord:
discord.gg/BHCxvKUpVF

[@smallmann9202]

Damn this was really pleasant to listen to, good job dude. I legitimately feel like Ive learned something new here.

[@telosbound]

Good vid. What helped me understand Zizek is always thinking in terms of failure and subjectivity. What is the objet a? Idgaf about what Lacan thought, because it’s clear what it is for Zizek: it’s the subject. The subject is the failure to become transparent to itself (a 1:1 being) and the very remainder of this failure is the objet a/subject.

[@telosbound]

Zizek acts like there’s a substantial difference between his objet a and Sartre’s “nihilating nothingness” but the reality is there just isn’t. Todd McGowan told me this himself.

[@dissatisfiedphilosophy]

@@telosbound zizek despises sartre so he won’t ever concede ground

[@36cmbr]

Keeping working but it seems you misconstrue the pair.

[@zedexer]

Just put the mic down