A Cool Exponential Equation | i^x=e

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 26

  • @renesperb
    @renesperb Год назад +11

    If you write the equation as e^(x*i*π/2) = e1,it follows immediately that x= -2 i/π .

  • @oenrn
    @oenrn Год назад +2

    i = e^(i(2n+½)pi)
    i^x = e^(i(2n+½)pi*x)
    e = e*e^(i2mpi) = e^(i2mpi +1)
    n,m € Z
    i^x = e
    e^(i(2n+½)pi*x) = e^(i2mpi + 1)
    i(2n+½)pi*x = i2mpi + 1
    Divide by i*pi
    (2n+½)x = 2m - i/pi
    x = (2m - i/pi)/(2n+½) n,m € Z
    For n = 0 you get x = 4m - 2i/pi, which is your solution.

  • @michaelbaum6796
    @michaelbaum6796 Год назад

    Very nice👍

  • @Chitin-qy7xy
    @Chitin-qy7xy Год назад +1

    Our brave syber

  • @ManjulaMathew-wb3zn
    @ManjulaMathew-wb3zn 7 месяцев назад

    If you back substitute the general solution the original equation and considering i = e^i(4k+1)PI/2?and x=2(1+2nPIi)/PIi
    i^x = e^((4k+1)(1+2nPIi)
    For this to satisfy the original equation k=n=0
    That means there is only one solution x =-2i/PI
    No general solution.

    • @ManjulaMathew-wb3zn
      @ManjulaMathew-wb3zn 7 месяцев назад

      I tried adding the 2mPI to the LHS to generate a general solution. When resubmit to verify the answer it works only if m=0

    • @ManjulaMathew-wb3zn
      @ManjulaMathew-wb3zn 7 месяцев назад

      I thought a little further why the general solutions didn’t work. On both RHS and LHS you are evaluating the function (which is e^(y) in this case) and take the inverse of it ( ln(e^y)in this case) which should bring back the original variable y. In RHS y=1 but you get y=1+2iPIn instead. For these two values to be equal n must be zero. ‘This is because n=0 covers the entire unit circle. When you are evaluating the kth root it is fine because you are inverting the kth root of the function not the function itself. In this case to complete the unit circle n=0,…..k
      Makes sense?

  • @kobalt4083
    @kobalt4083 Год назад +1

    The imaginary unit i in polar form is e^(iπ/2).
    So [e^(iπ/2)]^x=e.
    By the property (a^b)^c=a^bc:
    e^(iπx/2)=e
    Taking the natural logarithm ln of both sides:
    iπx/2=1
    Multiplying both sides by 2 and dividing by iπ yields us with x=2/iπ. To simplify this, multiply both the numerator and denominator by i to get x=2i/-π=-2i/π.
    So x=-2i/π for x ∈ ℤ

  • @academic-tree-justice
    @academic-tree-justice Год назад +2

    対数の底が複素数まで拡張されているなら、x=log i e
    で間違いではない。つまり、正しい。

  • @ilanbar1970
    @ilanbar1970 Год назад

    Nice. Thanks ❤

  • @marzipanhoplite17
    @marzipanhoplite17 Год назад

    I chose the third method and since I don't have any problem at all seeing i in the denominator I let it x=2/πi

  • @MathOrient
    @MathOrient Год назад

    I like these simple equations :)

  • @XJWill1
    @XJWill1 Год назад +2

    You persist in the mistake of calling some of the solutions you found as the "principal value". Again, that is incorrect. All of the solutions you found are for the principal branch of the complex exponentiation. Real-valued constants do NOT have branch cuts.
    As I have repeated several times now, when you raise a number that is not positive real-valued to a non-integer exponent, the result is multi-valued. That is what creates branch cuts. Not arbitrarily choosing a real constant and multiplying it by exp(i*n*2*pi). That doing so will magically produce all solutions is just an unwarranted assumption that will fail to produce correct results in general.
    If you want the full solution set for this problem, it is:
    x = (2/pi) * (n*2*pi - i) / (4*k + 1) k, n are integers
    where the PRINCIPAL BRANCH of the complex exponentiation is taken by choosing k = 0 and any integer n.

  • @vickoza1
    @vickoza1 3 месяца назад

    Does this mean 1^x=e has a solution?

  • @mustangjoe2071
    @mustangjoe2071 Год назад

    Interesting. I haven't taken complex analysis yet, but I naively took 4th power on each side which led to xln(1)=4 which obviously doesn't work

    • @kobalt4083
      @kobalt4083 Год назад

      Yeah, sometimes squaring or raising to fourth power will produce something that's obviously not true

  • @arekkrolak6320
    @arekkrolak6320 Год назад

    Multiplication of exponents is not necessarily true in complex numbers

  • @vaggelissmyrniotis2194
    @vaggelissmyrniotis2194 Год назад

    General solution is
    x=(4nπ-2i)/((4k+1)π) n,k integers

  • @scottleung9587
    @scottleung9587 Год назад

    I got the principal value, but I find the general solution tricky.

  • @luisoswaldoramirezzevallos3049

    Why € Z? Sorry.

  • @harikrishnak9009
    @harikrishnak9009 Год назад

    Nice❤

  • @itzerr5547
    @itzerr5547 Год назад

    I have made system of eqn, please solve this for real solutions :
    (a+b+c+d)/4 = 4th root of (abcd).........(1)
    ln(ln(ln(a^b^c^2))) = 2........(2)
    That's my challenge for you.

  • @giuseppemalaguti435
    @giuseppemalaguti435 Год назад

    x=-2i/pi

  • @broytingaravsol
    @broytingaravsol Год назад +1

    x=-2i/(1+4n)π

  • @wonghonkongjames4495
    @wonghonkongjames4495 Год назад

    Good Morning Sir e tt i(丌÷2)=i ⇒ i tt -i(丌÷2)=e