Make Astro Even Faster!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 авг 2024
- A quick look at pairing the MPA architecture of Astro with the power of Qwik's resumability.
Inspiration: www.builder.io...
💬 Topics:
- Why use Astro;
- Why use Qwik;
- Astro vs. Qwik;
- MPA vs SPA;
- Fast, modern web apps;
📖 Blog Article - www.awesome.cl...
Patreon: / awesomeclub
#javascript
I love this. Instead of everyone competing to be the next React, we’re getting two crazy good frameworks working together to offer us more ways to get the best performance 😎
So true!
This is where I like the fact that HTMX is resumable by default. Copy the HTML and you've copied the entire frontend state, just like with Qwik, but your backend does not have to be javascript
Literally came to see such HTMX comment. Kudos 👏🏻 But really give it a try and decide for yourself
Would love to see more on Astro!
It's one of my favorite frameworks - more content to come for certain!
@@ShimoriUta Will do!
Your videos are awesome
Thank you so much 😀
this is awesome, Aweome!
Thank you!
Will it beat htmx?? in htmx, html can be generated in something like rust and streamed to client right?
Htmx isn't a framework you can't build as fast as js frameworks like react, svelte, qwik etc. Both serve different purpose
Please compare this to HTMX or to ASTRO + HTMX.
Thanks for your suggestion!
I have an HTMX video - ruclips.net/video/cYLGboNUOlk/видео.html , but I'll definitely explore the topic further.
Nice vídeo, did you hire fireship to make it or just copied him?
Pretty much copying until I get enough money to hire him.
Astro is basically a SSG?
It can do ssr too
@@TechBuddy_ Ok, is it possible to write a Frontend in Astro and a backend in say Rust? Or does Astro always need a JS runtime like node? I've built a Website with astro, after running astro build i can just copy whats in the /dist folder to my server and have it hosted without a js runtime
Yep - as @TechBuddy_ mentioned, you can do SSG, SSR or a combination of both.
can you review VanillaJS the fastest and most stable framework
how would qwik not be faster than vanilla js? It fundamentally sends smaller bits of js than frameworks and vanilla js would
@@Nick-ti9rz implement your own qwik like "small bit of js"-sender in vanilla
@Sandeep-zu7gd This is a good idea for a video :D Thank!
You technically can get faster than this but you'll have to pull your hair out to maintain it or if you want to change anything 😂
Hmm do you think so? Where do you foresee pain points?
Bro u dont know what ur talking about
@@awesome-coding I was talking about the title 😅
@@echoptic775 how tf did you decide that based on two random lines I wrote in a comment 😂
@@TechBuddy_ Ah, got it!
I am was afraid the a new faster JS framework dropped,
but honestly i relieved yet disappointment at the end
😅😂
I think nextjs is enough for me, i’m done 😂
Fair enough.
Using astro is such a pain in the butt.. I hated coding in it
Hmm.. why is that? What where the main pain points.
I am actually using it in production for quite a while now, and we have very good results both in performance and in DX.
i tot sveltekit is fast enough
It is for most scenarios :)
Everything's is a bit too fast in this video to follow… had to stop, rewind, and listen and read again, several times
Thank you for your feedback! It really helps me understand how can I improve my videos.
I'm faster
He's fast as fuck boiiii
😂
What about this vs Fresh.js from Deno
Good point - Fresh is a really good competitor in the space. They use islands as well for interactivity, but it lacks the Resumability aspect Qwik is bringing to the mix.