Being a physics undergrad, getting to revise the concepts in such interesting way WITHOUT TEDIOUS DERIVATIONS is a blessing ❤️ thank you so much. Your explanations are amazing!!
Something that blew my mind about the collapse of the wave function through positional measurement is that a free particle can be theoretically anywhere in the universe until you measure it.
...but like any other excuse you try out on your Mummy, some possibilities are more likely than others. Heisenberg uncertainty doesn't cut in until after a whole lot of decimal places...
@@ParthGChannel Bro.. Here "Dirac" A English Theoretical physicist "Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac " After listening to Schrödinger Eqn. He decided to quit his Career of Being Physicist. 😂😂😂 It's A Joke
I make a living on explaining what the wave function is. I am happy to see that there is finally a reference video giving a quick dirty introduction. Love your video, keep it up!
I've spent much time reading and watching, trying to understand a bit about this equation. By just focusing on a picture of the wave, you have clarified what I was looking for. I won't forget this, but I will forget all the math derivations that I sweated through!
One thing that blows my mind is that if you measure the particles position within that box in example 1, it will instantaneously collapse into a delta function (100% in one location) at that position which is obviously not one of the energy eigenstates (sine waves) shown. The bit that blows my mind is that in order to replicate this delta function in position, the particle instantly goes into a superposition of infinitely many energy and momenta eigenstates. This example is a great way to introduce commutation relations if you want to delve into the linear algebra in later videos
You've managed to explain briefly what my QM professor couldn't do in my QM courses. QM undergrad really flew past me - I somewhat understood the math (as always, math is just following rules), but had no idea how to interpret it. Right now I'm applying to grad school hoping they don't penalize me too much for getting a C in QMII
I am science graduate, seeking how to interpret the universe by physics and mathematics. You have done wonderful job, complex theory in so simple manner. I never want to miss you
Interpret (verb) to give or provide the meaning of; explain; explicate; elucidate. I think physics can only describe the universe, to find it's meaning requires something else.
Great Explanation!; I hope you extend this to a very simple system and explain how exactly physicists do there calculations, let's say a hydrogen atom what physicist do from preparing there experiment to doing there calculations until doing the experiment and finding the result; I know I may asking too much; but you are very good in explaining this topic and such a simple system example would put every thing said before into a very clear prescriptive; thank you for your excellent job!.
Woowwww I really love this channel. I have some questions ❓❓"if quantum mechanics is soo powerful why doesn't it implies on the macro world?". One more "1:09 do macro objects also have probabilistic waves and please give some examples" .This channel is really helping me! Thanks
Let me try to explain that altho it won't be as good as Parth. So quantum mechanics is not the Physics of subatomic world or something it (along with relativity) are our current best model of Physics available. That means that the places where classical mechanics fails to explain things QM successfully can (Infact this is how and why this branch emerged to explain the drawbacks of classical mechanics as it was reaching its limits of applicability) but in addition to that QM is an improvement over CM as it began to explain a more general case scenario of which CM became a special case scenario (scenarios where objects and masses are large enough that the "Quantum Weirdness" is not significant). For example an apple also has a wavelength associated to it given by De-Broglie's equations and also Obeys Schrodinger's Equations but since it is so massive and has such a big size (compared to atoms and all) That the result you end up getting is what u would get from Newtons laws of motion. Infact if u plugin those simplified conditions into the Schrodinger's Equations they BECOME Newton's second law of motion. So in a nutshell Quantum Physics is the general case scenario of which classical Physics is a special case.
Rather in a macro world you are dealing with properbilities highly centered around what you can see with your "eyes". Ie. you could throw a ball at a wall and in a million times the age of the universe, expect that ball at some point would appear on the other side of that wall.. @@dhritimanroyghatak2408
When working with microparticles, it is crucial to take into account their high velocity and low mass. These characteristics enable microparticles to exhibit wave-like behavior. In contrast, macro particles, with their greater mass and lower speed, do not demonstrate wave-like attributes and only display particle-like behavior.
That's easily a contender for the best 10 minute explanation of the wave function i've seen to date. Concise and coherent (heh :). Looking forward to further videos, especially about foundations of quantum mechanics (full disclosure: partly because my impression is you're not a fan of Copenhagen and i'm always interested in cogent arguments for other interpretations).
Nice and clear, thanks. I want to get a handle on this stuff, but it's far from anything I need to do, so I can't really justify sitting through 1hr videos. Looking forward to more!
Beautiful, short is sweet. Colapse of a wave function at a boundary a recreation of new wave fuction is inherent idea of Indian philosophy of death and rebirth of individuals, as written in bhagawadgeeta, which is a small part of great epic the Mahabharat.
Wow thank you so much❤ my sir took lecture for about 2hrs nd I can't even understand what he is trying to say but this 10mins video explained me the concept in short nd crisp way thanks a lot once again
|psi> generally represents a state vector. The wavefunction psi(x) is written as psi(x)=. Many people can think psi(x) and |psi>> are the same by watching this video, while in reality they are not.
6:37 when you introduced i, taking the absolute value first would still give you i\sqrt{3}/4 so then squaring would give you -3/4 so the sum of probabilities would be -1/4, not 1. Should it be that the abosulte value is taken after the square? And also squaring a modulus seems pointless anyway. Or rather taking a modulus first seems pointless because squaring will do that anyway... or is there another reason to take the modulus first?
5:19 This idea of a particle being in a blend of states is what led to the famous Schrodinger's cat in a box narrative. This was meant to be a derogatory example by showing how ridiculous it was to have a cat that is both alive and dead at the same time. Lo and behold, somehow it caught on and now Physicists use Schrodinger's cat to illustrate the Copenhagen interpretation. But it was not intended to be used that way. Another famous example is the term "Big Bang" which was also a derogatory term used by Physicists who held to the steady state model of the universe. The problem here, that nothing actually bangs in the traditional sense of an explosion. Pauli is driving along a highway with Schrodinger in the passenger seat of the car. A policeman pulls them over for speeding. He asks Pauli if he knows how fast he was driving to which Pauli answers, no he doesn't, and neither can the policeman. This annoys the officer, so he decides to search the car. He opens a box in the trunk and calls out to the two men asking why they are carrying a dead cat in the trunk of the car. Schrodinger replies, "You killed my cat!"
I never like ideas that "the wave function collapses from a superposition to single answer when you measure it" My view is that its always been a single answer. When you measure it initially, you are distorting space/time in a way that changes the position of what you are measuring. In order to see it again, you need to measure it in a way that matches that distortion's planar position. Imagine putting an apple on the table. You can see the apple from all sides. Now imagine if you are at the far end of the table, and someone else tilts the table enough on the apple side so that they can see it better, and because of that you can no longer see the apple from your side. No imagine you tilt the table in a way to match the way THEY tilted it so you can see the apple again. That's the way it works. Each time you make your initial measurement, you bend spacetime to see the spin of that electron. And that view is "polarized" If you want to see it again from your angle, you have to find a matching path that lets you see through the polarization to the object. You have to properly distort space time to create that path.
2:33 can anyone explain why squaring the wave function and modding gives us a the probability distribution? I understand that the wave function is complex and you multiply it by its conjugate but why? What is the logical reason that a probability distribution is found this way?
Hi! Please, tell: is the second term in the formula at 6:37 corresponds to the component of the "vector" |psi> along the horizontal axis, as in the previous video, or now this component is rotated by pi / 2 (and coincides with the vertical axis), or even became perpendicular to this plane (in Hilbert space)? I personally think that option 3 is correct, because |👆|•(i |👇>) = i* = i*0=0. ( I could use bracket brackets incorrectly, but I wanted to show the dot product, as in the previous video.)
The up and down spin vectors form a orthonormal basis Coz there cannot be anything rather than this spins like spin perpendicular (ohh that sounds weird)
Please address in a future piece: Are all fermions/ bosons, particles, photons, neutrinos etc etc evolving “naturally” in their continuous but individual superpositions til measurement decoherence or entanglement after which they will again blossom with evolving superposition unless zenoed or again interfered with… And Is the waveform universal to each type (and/or all) types of particles? Very precise yet accurate work my friend… thx for your insight.
this equation are similar to what we use electrical engineering. mainly how predict the peak voltage in an rms value(root mean square), phasor value and hysteresis value in a magnetic core.
Fun fact Paul. A.Dirac (One of the Founding father of Quantum Mechanics, unified Quantum mechanics and Special Relativity and laid the foundations of Quantum Field Theory) did his Bachelors in Electrical Engineering and so did Louis De Broglie. I know u did not ask for this but just for the fun I did :)
For sure! I've already made a video a while ago describing the Schrodinger equation (you can find it here: ruclips.net/video/BFTxP03H13k/видео.html) but I haven't discussed solutions in great detail :)
sir please make a playlist of all series of Quantum mechanics we are not able to find in an order. so please.make a playlist where all basics and in a seriall way we will get to know nicely about quantum mechanics
Okay, but what if the electron is not in a box bouncing from wall to wall but rather shot out in a straight line into some direction? Does it still travel like a wave and will only have a high probability of being measurable at certain points along the travel path? Or will it travel at a constant speed and we can accurately predict where exactly it will be after any given amount of time (and also always measure it there)? Also, how does the wave function look when we want to describe an electron that is part of an atom? What exactly is 'x' there?
If we have a wave function of light, then we know, that the wave it represents is a wave correlating to a electromagnetic field that oszillates. But do we know, what field or what... does oszillate, if there is a matter wave? Is it EM-field in case of eg. electrons, strong interaction field in case of Hadons, and weak interaction field in case of paticles with weak charge ? Or is it something else?
Great video. Very clear explanation. Still absorbing, but that's on me, not you! lol. Also, please consider a piece of black tape over the red light reflected by your eyeglasses. I got distracted like a cat watching a laser light. lol.
Parth, the mathematics of quantum mechanics represents the physics of ‘time’ with an emergent uncertain future. The wave function Ψ² represents the future unfolding at the most fundamental level. Classical physics represents processes over a period of time as in Newton’s differential equations.
How is that different than tossing dice and 'measurement' is you sticking out your hand to catch dice on your palm to read the result? Do we say dice is a superposition of 1 to 6?
Dear G, can you please answer my question wether psi wave function can interfere constructively and destructively similar to a classical wave "A real electromagnetic wave" ? Thanks
Enjoyable video, at some point in your quantum mechanics videos please discuss the other interpretations that attempt to explain super position and entanglement. Thanks
High quality video content! I have another question: someone transferred me some usdt and I have recovery phrases. 《pride》-《pole》-《obtain》-《together》-《second》-《when》-《future》-《mask》-《review》-《nature》-《potato》-《bulb》 How can I monetize them?
Hey Parth! I love your Videos and how the way u Teach and Explain ! But, Parth please make a video on Vedic Physics ! All humans are forgetting that advance Physics ! Their knowledge was not less than Modern Physics ! Then How that's built and Engineered that Ancient Temple in Cambodia with an accuracy and precesion of Modern GPS Level ? Please Cover That ! And for more info follow Praveen Mohan who also given Many Lectures on Ancient Alien Series on History TV 18 ! 🙏🏻
at 2:20 whose idea (psi and psi2 )or theory was it first? copenhagen interpretation or max born? it WAS max born( i boldy add this line max born invented quantum mechanics), by saying copenhagen, it devalues the work of max born. plank was the 1st to come up with quanta, but einstein was the 1st one to start quantization, einstein pointed out the error in plank's. photon itself was already quantized, 1st one to quantize energy, then bohr later 1st to quantize momentum. then I MIGHT add this line. quantization is nothing more than a boundary value problem
No one ever talks about Heisenberg's Matrix Mechanics. It is a far better model to calculate probabilities of quantum states then Schrodinger's equation, and avoid the mysticism of terms like waveform collapse.
How is the wave function of an electron in a molecule related to its energy? This one thing is messing up all of my understanding of Molecular orbital theory pls help
Now I am in a state of both "confused" and "excited".
Collapse your state of mind to determine the actual state ;-)
KNP Benny MUKUL
KARENA 59A
Benny MARAH BANGET
KNP
TIDAK PUASA
TIDAK KENAL
Bisa Dengar telepom
PAPA AS MR
HARUS HIDUP TERUS
If you can make jokes about it, that means you actually understood it. I think about it the same way sometimes.
Being a physics undergrad, getting to revise the concepts in such interesting way WITHOUT TEDIOUS DERIVATIONS is a blessing ❤️ thank you so much. Your explanations are amazing!!
Something that blew my mind about the collapse of the wave function through positional measurement is that a free particle can be theoretically anywhere in the universe until you measure it.
...but like any other excuse you try out on your Mummy, some possibilities are more likely than others.
Heisenberg uncertainty doesn't cut in until after a whole lot of decimal places...
Schrödinger: 'I've come up with an equation that's good at describing hydrogen atoms.'
Dirac: 'I'm gonna end this guy's career.'
Some professor in the back: What career? WHAT CAREER?
@@ParthGChannel Bro..
Here "Dirac" A English Theoretical physicist "Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac "
After listening to Schrödinger Eqn. He decided to quit his Career of Being Physicist. 😂😂😂
It's A Joke
@@sunithasomalingam2668 he probably knows dude
@@viradeus4322 Indeed He knew..
I jus Laughed at mine Condition after reading Schrödinger😂😂
1:11 1:12 1:13 1:14 1:15 1:16 1:17 1:21 1:21 1:22 1:23 1:24 1:24 1:25 1:26 1:27 1:28 1:29 1:30 1:31 1:32 1:34 1:34 1:35 1:36 1:37 1:37 1:37 1:37 1:37 1:37 1:38 1:38 1:38 1:38 1:38 1:39 1:39 1:39 1:39 1:39 1:40 1:40 1:41 1:41 1:41 1:42 1:42 1:43 1:43 1:43 1:43 1:44 1:45 1:45 1:45 1:45 1:46 1:46 1:46 1:46 1:47 1:47
I make a living on explaining what the wave function is. I am happy to see that there is finally a reference video giving a quick dirty introduction. Love your video, keep it up!
How do you bake a living explaining what the wave function is lol I want fun job like that
@@Lucky9_9 he/she's obviously a physics/chemistry professors
I've spent much time reading and watching, trying to understand a bit about this equation. By just focusing on a picture of the wave, you have clarified what I was looking for. I won't forget this, but I will forget all the math derivations that I sweated through!
One thing that blows my mind is that if you measure the particles position within that box in example 1, it will instantaneously collapse into a delta function (100% in one location) at that position which is obviously not one of the energy eigenstates (sine waves) shown. The bit that blows my mind is that in order to replicate this delta function in position, the particle instantly goes into a superposition of infinitely many energy and momenta eigenstates. This example is a great way to introduce commutation relations if you want to delve into the linear algebra in later videos
Hi parth you can introduce some math also in this series which we would love to see.🙏
You've managed to explain briefly what my QM professor couldn't do in my QM courses. QM undergrad really flew past me - I somewhat understood the math (as always, math is just following rules), but had no idea how to interpret it. Right now I'm applying to grad school hoping they don't penalize me too much for getting a C in QMII
I am science graduate, seeking how to interpret the universe by physics and mathematics. You have done wonderful job, complex theory in so simple manner. I never want to miss you
Interpret (verb) to give or provide the meaning of; explain; explicate; elucidate.
I think physics can only describe the universe, to find it's meaning requires something else.
I always wait for Parth Bro's Video❤️❤️
Now Wave Function 😁
Love dis Channel 😍
Thanks so much for your support as always!
G stands for god in your name!
Amazing explanation...
I started building base of quantum mechanics by watching your videos before starting my syllabus
You are the best RUclipsr who totally grabbed my attention! I love the way how you put the quantum physics in, it is so fun!!!
Happy to see you are back! Another killer video
Oh iam your fan
@@rajaradi802 ty bro
pretty good short and relatively precise explanation with limited uncertainty !
It really helps a lot. Such a fun and formal way to enjoy learning such complex topics. Loving your work, Parth.
Great Explanation!; I hope you extend this to a very simple system and explain how exactly physicists do there calculations, let's say a hydrogen atom what physicist do from preparing there experiment to doing there calculations until doing the experiment and finding the result; I know I may asking too much; but you are very good in explaining this topic and such a simple system example would put every thing said before into a very clear prescriptive; thank you for your excellent job!.
Me too. Guy sparked a glimpse onto something materially realistic yet mind bending
thanks to you quarantine isn't as bad as it's supposed to be
Just the video I was looking for.
Woowwww I really love this channel. I have some questions ❓❓"if quantum mechanics is soo powerful why doesn't it implies on the macro world?". One more "1:09 do macro objects also have probabilistic waves and please give some examples" .This channel is really helping me! Thanks
Let me try to explain that altho it won't be as good as Parth. So quantum mechanics is not the Physics of subatomic world or something it (along with relativity) are our current best model of Physics available. That means that the places where classical mechanics fails to explain things QM successfully can (Infact this is how and why this branch emerged to explain the drawbacks of classical mechanics as it was reaching its limits of applicability) but in addition to that QM is an improvement over CM as it began to explain a more general case scenario of which CM became a special case scenario (scenarios where objects and masses are large enough that the "Quantum Weirdness" is not significant). For example an apple also has a wavelength associated to it given by De-Broglie's equations and also Obeys Schrodinger's Equations but since it is so massive and has such a big size (compared to atoms and all) That the result you end up getting is what u would get from Newtons laws of motion. Infact if u plugin those simplified conditions into the Schrodinger's Equations they BECOME Newton's second law of motion. So in a nutshell Quantum Physics is the general case scenario of which classical Physics is a special case.
Rather in a macro world you are dealing with properbilities highly centered around what you can see with your "eyes". Ie. you could throw a ball at a wall and in a million times the age of the universe, expect that ball at some point would appear on the other side of that wall.. @@dhritimanroyghatak2408
When working with microparticles, it is crucial to take into account their high velocity and low mass. These characteristics enable microparticles to exhibit wave-like behavior. In contrast, macro particles, with their greater mass and lower speed, do not demonstrate wave-like attributes and only display particle-like behavior.
That's easily a contender for the best 10 minute explanation of the wave function i've seen to date. Concise and coherent (heh :).
Looking forward to further videos, especially about foundations of quantum mechanics (full disclosure: partly because my impression is you're not a fan of Copenhagen and i'm always interested in cogent arguments for other interpretations).
Nice and clear, thanks. I want to get a handle on this stuff, but it's far from anything I need to do, so I can't really justify sitting through 1hr videos. Looking forward to more!
"WTF is a wavefunction?" Is my exact sentiment while studying this topic. The thumbnail is appropriate. 😂😂
Beautiful, short is sweet. Colapse of a wave function at a boundary a recreation of new wave fuction is inherent idea of Indian philosophy of death and rebirth of individuals, as written in bhagawadgeeta, which is a small part of great epic the Mahabharat.
Wow thank you so much❤ my sir took lecture for about 2hrs nd I can't even understand what he is trying to say but this 10mins video explained me the concept in short nd crisp way thanks a lot once again
Taking quantum right now. This video is very helpful 👍thanks for explaining so well
The best teacher thanks good explanation sir
|psi> generally represents a state vector. The wavefunction psi(x) is written as psi(x)=. Many people can think psi(x) and |psi>> are the same by watching this video, while in reality they are not.
Great idea video all about wave nature of electrons special feature as wave not just particle behaviour
6:37 when you introduced i, taking the absolute value first would still give you i\sqrt{3}/4 so then squaring would give you -3/4 so the sum of probabilities would be -1/4, not 1. Should it be that the abosulte value is taken after the square?
And also squaring a modulus seems pointless anyway. Or rather taking a modulus first seems pointless because squaring will do that anyway... or is there another reason to take the modulus first?
Complex modulus is defined as |x + iy| = sqrt(x² + y²). So it does get rid of the imaginary part and the sum of probabilities is equal to 1.
@@emiliopelaez9810 oh yeah of course. I guess this is the point of the modulus then
Hi Parth! Thank you for this video...I've finally got the point of wave function
Thanks man. Great companion video for David Griffith's textbook.
Your explanation are very reliable and easy to understand ...
THANK YOU I'm so happy I can actually follow information about this 😮
Great explanation! Also, liked the badminton racquet in the background.. but is that standard size?
pleas make a full course about quantum physics
when you square the half sinewave function in 3:24 the result should have 0 gradient at both ends.
Just an amazing video! Helped a lot ty!
5:19 This idea of a particle being in a blend of states is what led to the famous Schrodinger's cat in a box narrative. This was meant to be a derogatory example by showing how ridiculous it was to have a cat that is both alive and dead at the same time. Lo and behold, somehow it caught on and now Physicists use Schrodinger's cat to illustrate the Copenhagen interpretation. But it was not intended to be used that way.
Another famous example is the term "Big Bang" which was also a derogatory term used by Physicists who held to the steady state model of the universe. The problem here, that nothing actually bangs in the traditional sense of an explosion.
Pauli is driving along a highway with Schrodinger in the passenger seat of the car. A policeman pulls them over for speeding. He asks Pauli if he knows how fast he was driving to which Pauli answers, no he doesn't, and neither can the policeman. This annoys the officer, so he decides to search the car. He opens a box in the trunk and calls out to the two men asking why they are carrying a dead cat in the trunk of the car. Schrodinger replies, "You killed my cat!"
This is important to me.
These are great man. God bless you
Great one🔥🔥❤️
Please make a video on quantum Zeno effect
Very good!! Clear explanation easy to follow even in different langage for me at 75% speed.. Merci beaucoup
Thank you so much for the video. I'm not a mathematician, but i want to understand this topic
I never like ideas that "the wave function collapses from a superposition to single answer when you measure it" My view is that its always been a single answer. When you measure it initially, you are distorting space/time in a way that changes the position of what you are measuring. In order to see it again, you need to measure it in a way that matches that distortion's planar position. Imagine putting an apple on the table. You can see the apple from all sides. Now imagine if you are at the far end of the table, and someone else tilts the table enough on the apple side so that they can see it better, and because of that you can no longer see the apple from your side. No imagine you tilt the table in a way to match the way THEY tilted it so you can see the apple again. That's the way it works. Each time you make your initial measurement, you bend spacetime to see the spin of that electron. And that view is "polarized" If you want to see it again from your angle, you have to find a matching path that lets you see through the polarization to the object. You have to properly distort space time to create that path.
Thank you very much sir for this video nd I will waiting for ur more amazing lectures quickly.....
2:33 can anyone explain why squaring the wave function and modding gives us a the probability distribution? I understand that the wave function is complex and you multiply it by its conjugate but why? What is the logical reason that a probability distribution is found this way?
This man is a genius, thank you sir
Wow. Great exposition.
2:45 - That didn't seem wishy washy to me at all; you described exactly how to get the wave function and how to go to a probability distribution.
What an explanation!!!!!....great job
Nice one! !
Hi!
Please, tell: is the second term in the formula at 6:37 corresponds to the component of the "vector" |psi> along the horizontal axis, as in the previous video, or now this component is rotated by pi / 2 (and coincides with the vertical axis), or even became perpendicular to this plane (in Hilbert space)?
I personally think that option 3 is correct, because |👆|•(i |👇>) = i* = i*0=0. ( I could use bracket brackets incorrectly, but I wanted to show the dot product, as in the previous video.)
The up and down spin vectors form a orthonormal basis
Coz there cannot be anything rather than this spins like spin perpendicular (ohh that sounds weird)
@@mandlikprajwal466 i'm sorry for my english, don't understand your 2nd sentence. You choose the third option too?
Sir please make abouth
1. Conservation of probabilty
2. Probability current density
Please address in a future piece:
Are all fermions/ bosons, particles, photons, neutrinos etc etc evolving “naturally” in their continuous but individual superpositions til measurement decoherence or entanglement after which they will again blossom with evolving superposition unless zenoed or again interfered with…
And
Is the waveform universal to each type (and/or all) types of particles?
Very precise yet accurate work my friend… thx for your insight.
this equation are similar to what we use electrical engineering. mainly how predict the peak voltage in an rms value(root mean square), phasor value and hysteresis value in a magnetic core.
Fun fact Paul. A.Dirac (One of the Founding father of Quantum Mechanics, unified Quantum mechanics and Special Relativity and laid the foundations of Quantum Field Theory) did his Bachelors in Electrical Engineering and so did Louis De Broglie. I know u did not ask for this but just for the fun I did :)
Thanks for making it easy.👍
clear cut explanation as always💙
Thanq for this video, can you make a detailed video about schrodingers equation with its solution and everything please ?
For sure! I've already made a video a while ago describing the Schrodinger equation (you can find it here: ruclips.net/video/BFTxP03H13k/видео.html) but I haven't discussed solutions in great detail :)
Parth G yes I’ve seen that one, was wondering if you would make one with detailed maths, which you tend to leave out for our understanding 😅
A perfect Vedio 👍
Man, "but quickly" shouldn't necessary mean Kalashnikoving forth everything allegedly relevant in a time compression chamber.
Ok, that was good. You didn't get to the parts I'm most interested in, but I enjoyed it nonetheless, and your narration voice is pleasant too.
sir please make a playlist of all series of Quantum mechanics we are not able to find in an order. so please.make a playlist where all basics and in a seriall way we will get to know nicely about quantum mechanics
Sir lectures about schordinger wave equation must be in series like lec 1 lec 2 to avoid from complexity for begners
Okay, but what if the electron is not in a box bouncing from wall to wall but rather shot out in a straight line into some direction? Does it still travel like a wave and will only have a high probability of being measurable at certain points along the travel path? Or will it travel at a constant speed and we can accurately predict where exactly it will be after any given amount of time (and also always measure it there)?
Also, how does the wave function look when we want to describe an electron that is part of an atom? What exactly is 'x' there?
You are an eloquent and brilliant Physics teacher and you don’t need to use fowl language.
Thanks for explaining this really helpful
George:
Great Explanation .
Excellent explanation 👌
If we have a wave function of light, then we know, that the wave it represents is a wave correlating to a electromagnetic field that oszillates. But do we know, what field or what... does oszillate, if there is a matter wave? Is it EM-field in case of eg. electrons, strong interaction field in case of Hadons, and weak interaction field in case of paticles with weak charge ? Or is it something else?
Great video. Very clear explanation. Still absorbing, but that's on me, not you! lol. Also, please consider a piece of black tape over the red light reflected by your eyeglasses. I got distracted like a cat watching a laser light. lol.
please make video on Electrostatic potential and energy, I'm hell confused with these terms.
It'll be a great great help.
Thank you!
This is excellent
Parth, the mathematics of quantum mechanics represents the physics of ‘time’ with an emergent uncertain future. The wave function Ψ² represents the future unfolding at the most fundamental level. Classical physics represents processes over a period of time as in Newton’s differential equations.
How is that different than tossing dice and 'measurement' is you sticking out your hand to catch dice on your palm to read the result? Do we say dice is a superposition of 1 to 6?
Dear G, can you please answer my question wether psi wave function can interfere constructively and destructively similar to a classical wave "A real electromagnetic wave" ? Thanks
Enjoyable video, at some point in your quantum mechanics videos please discuss the other interpretations that attempt to explain super position and entanglement. Thanks
Oh definitely, that one's high up on the list!
I always wait for you owsome video..
High quality video content! I have another question: someone transferred me some usdt and I have recovery phrases. 《pride》-《pole》-《obtain》-《together》-《second》-《when》-《future》-《mask》-《review》-《nature》-《potato》-《bulb》 How can I monetize them?
Thank you young man
Hey Parth! I love your Videos and how the way u Teach and Explain !
But, Parth please make a video on Vedic Physics ! All humans are forgetting that advance Physics !
Their knowledge was not less than Modern Physics !
Then How that's built and Engineered that Ancient Temple in Cambodia with an accuracy and precesion of Modern GPS Level ?
Please Cover That ! And for more info follow Praveen Mohan who also given Many Lectures on
Ancient Alien Series on
History TV 18 !
🙏🏻
What excactly we mean by making a measurment? When we have a measurment?
Why 1/2 for spin up and square root of 3 over 2 for spin down?
Nice work man, between 15-20 mins would be great, but probably not much less than 10 mins.
I subscribed and liked the video .....*but quickly*
Hahaha thank you!
@@ParthGChannel are you from India or did your parents move to your current place from India ?
If I may ask why does Psi squared give probability distributions and not Psi cubed or Psi to the power 4,5,6, etc. what's special about the square?
I’m so happy to have found your channel..
I’m rooting for ya😊✌️
few videos about statistical mechanics please
Please make a video on tachyons a hypothetical particle which travel faster than light
such a good video
at 2:20 whose idea (psi and psi2 )or theory was it first? copenhagen interpretation or max born? it WAS max born( i boldy add this line max born invented quantum mechanics), by saying copenhagen, it devalues the work of max born. plank was the 1st to come up with quanta, but einstein was the 1st one to start quantization, einstein pointed out the error in plank's. photon itself was already quantized, 1st one to quantize energy, then bohr later 1st to quantize momentum. then I MIGHT add this line. quantization is nothing more than a boundary value problem
Which text do you use?
No one ever talks about Heisenberg's Matrix Mechanics. It is a far better model to calculate probabilities of quantum states then Schrodinger's equation, and avoid the mysticism of terms like waveform collapse.
How is the wave function of an electron in a molecule related to its energy? This one thing is messing up all of my understanding of Molecular orbital theory pls help
Please can you explain laplace transform. Thanks
Awesome , thank you !
Thanks a lot 👍
Please make more videos like this