This judge clearly had an agenda and needs to be brought to justice.....I thank you for putting your neck on the line for this Daniel as i'm sure you're ruffling a lot of feathers by doing this! Keep up the good fight!
Well said I agree. It took courage to make this vid, and it's spot on. Hopefully this miscarriage of justice can be corrected. I bet Judge Nicol and some others wish this would all just go away, but I don't think it will. At least I hope not. Justice matters. And this case matters to a lot of people. Hopefully things can be set right. Great vid, well done by Black Belt Barrister 💯
@@junemai8036 No it was the judges son who worked with Dan Wootton at talk radio, it was Wootton who wrote the story for the Sun newspaper where he worked as an editor at the same time as working at talk radio. There was also talk about the judges wife entertaining Rupert Murdock but I don't know if that was true.
Rupert Murdock's son was friends with Elon Musk, and on the board for Tesla when he dated AH. The Judge, at the time he was appointed to the case, worked for a lawfirm, and co-authored a law book with the lawfirm's owner. AH's lawyer worked for the same lawfirm. AH's lawyer took her to a dinner during the trial that was hosted by the owner of the lawfirm's ex wife, and also attended by The judge's wife, and severel of AH's friends. Those women have been friends and supporters of AH for a long time. Including the judge's wife. And they all published support for AH DURING the trial. Including the Judge's wife.
It’s unfortunate that the UK doesn’t have the ethics rules for Judges that the US does. His blatant and numerous conflicts of interest would be not only grounds for nullification of his verdict, but serious disciplinary action against him.
in Europe almost every judgment can be brought before a European court. Today, when more and more countries are openly corrupt (e.g. my home country Switzerland) more and more important.
You can only have "an axe to grind" if you have REASONS for it. Amber Heard is an evil MANIPULATOR ... who PLANNED TO TAKE WHATEVER SHE CAN GET! There are pieces of evidence which suggest that SHE MIGHT EVEN HAVE PLANNED TO KILL JOHNNY DEPP (through the idiot Josh Drew "white knighting poor poor Amber Heard"). The accusations told to her psychiatrists from the start - if they are even actually given to the psychiatrist and not added later on by Amber herself - clearly show that she planned for it FROM THE START. She changed her description from "a magical first year" to "he was violent from the start" (so why marry the guy then???) after all.
Well, that doesn’t matters. As long as her testimonies are thrustful and accurate. It’s the issue here. The judge denied discovery on AH because she was only a witness. Despite the fact that AH had already lied under oath in Australia. This is why the 7 millions donation is such a big deal: it’s an easily proven lie under oath.
Elaine also thinks the Public are stupid.... Wrong... Some of us plebs/bots/fans understand law cases more than she presumes we do... You can fool some of the people....you know the saying... And fortunately, the UK decision is being spoken about, and the word being spread, so more folk will understand how JD "lost" but also how Amber "did not win" lol....
i am absolutely sure that IF the Virginia jury HAD looked up the UK trial with all its failures (judge being biased as fudge; AH only a witness, not a party, etc. ) they would have decided more in favor of JD, than they already did. No payment in AH's favor at all and much higher for JD... so if i where Elaine, i would do nothing to raise the interest to this UK case...
@@factsmatter8667 she is in her company mostly thanks to her late father, a founder of organization, and even have had some awards for her work. So, this is an example of how a daughter is overly confident just because her father war quite famous in his times and handed over the firm to her, but yet she is pretty awful in modern times and refuses to retire )) Poor staff members.
When I was first looking into this trial several years ago there was a reaLLY interesting chart that someone had made basically outlining the connections that the judge's wife and son had to either Heard or to the Sun. The judge's son worked for the same parent company that owned The Sun. His wife attended several women's charity dinners at which Heard was also present, and shared several mutual friends/mentors with Heard at the time. Those are just the two main connections I remember off the top of my head, but there were...more than just those. If you're going to seriously pursue this you should absolutely look into those claims, though.
I am so glad you are doing this. I lost my faith in our judicial system because of this judgement. It was high profile, I followed the trial and could not believe the result.
BBB the more you keep this in the public eye of the UK the better. There will be people like yourself in the legal profession, judges and other barristers that will not like the UK legal system questioned. The fact a Jury in the USA came to an unanimous decision will have made senior law makers in the UK squirm in their seats. We are very proud of our legal system in the UK and believe that it should be able to stand up to any level of criticism. Due to due process. Unfortunately in this instance the system has failed and that is now out there for the world to see. The Judge has been questioned as to whether he should have even resided over the case due to conflict of interest, that aside, I believe that if AH’s appeal is refused then the UK will reopen this judgement and potentially look at perjury, that way saving face and saying that they were misled so much so that a miscarriage of justice happened (that’s the ideal) the other side of the coin is that they won’t reopen it as it could be seen that we don’t believe in our own judges decisions or that our system has flaws. I hope that we decide on the first option, but I truly believe they will wait with any decision until AH’s appeal is dismissed. As someone who believes very strongly in our UK legal system I think it would be a travesty if we were to let this go and not reopen it, but truly only time will tell
The key words for me were "Choose what evidence she wanted to provide". As a proven liar, why should that not be a justification to have an appeal granted? BBB, I really like your videos.
I have signed the petition and am so grateful that you have cared enough to do something real to restablish justice. I hope the appeal goes through. This may be the only UK case of law many around the world will ever have reason to know. It definitely skews world perception of UK justice.
@Asshats Love Johnny Depp!! Johnny Depp Es Racista!! Do you have the records of Amber lying? Like a compilation. With a blade? Is that the knife that she gave him? Was it reported to the police? Any reports?
Brilliant analysis BBB. Your elucidation of the many instances of the judge enhancing AH's evidence, in order to support conclusions that were without foundation, is crystal clear. Good luck with the petition.
I think the powers that be in the UK are hoping it will all go away, which it isn't; but we should all be applying pressure on them to fix this disgraceful injustice IMHO. And that Judge should have consequences for this! I have already signed BBB's petition, but I feel more is needed. Any suggestions welcomed.
Yes I've signed the petition for an appeal. I hope this wretched dishonourable judge is not allowed to live out his retirement without being brought to account, along with his legal system cronies.
You make a compelling case! The question is: Having achieved his aim of public vindication, would Johnny want to spend the time, energy, and money on a second court trial? Unlike Amber, I don't get the feel that Johnny is enjoying raking up his private life in the public eye. In American law, there are circumstances in which a verdict can be overturned if some flaw is discovered after the fact. Could the revelation that Amber *hadn't* actually given away her divorce settlement to charity as she claimed be grounds for voiding the judgement? After all, the learned judge cited the "fact" of Amber having donated this money as proof of Amber's credibility. Now that we know that didn't happen, can the trial be invalidated under UK law, without any obligation that the matter be retried if the plaintiff (Johnny) has no desire to re-litegate?
It will need the Lord Chief Justice to intervene. How it would come to his attention is the tricky part. I think at this stage it is going to need some kind of hard hitting documentary for it to get attention.
Great question!.... The Sun, having previously hacked JD,s phone when Lily Rose was a sick child, had a strong will to ensure JD could not win... Evidence is the story of the truth and must be allowed to have explanations... JD was unable to disprove ambers evidence, by design. And yes, Nichol based his judgement on DONATED MONEY so regardless if the petition declares a mistrial, or conflict or whatever... Jd has proven ambers evidence was manipulated, fraudulent, and assisted by others ie; a HOAX.... So in effect, Adam Waldmans statement was correct... And its proven that Amber Heard is a Consumate Liar.
@@johnstrong5436 Along the lines of the Epstein/Maxwell/Brunel investigation by Julie K Brown... The length of time and number of witnesses who missed out on justice, in a fair and timely manner... Just a thought for a documentary...
I heard that Johnny's team brought up the donation as a part of the appeal and was told that it wasn't relied on significantly enough to sway the verdict.
I believe, especially after the UN decision to drop Ms. Heard as ambassador and declaring that DV has no gender, has potential to be global legal precedent. I thank you for standing up for all people in need of a voice. Greg Ellis is another person advocating change in "family law". Both of you are educated in UK and US law. Mr. Ellis has his experiences in the family law and false allegations. Quite fascinating and heartbreaking to hear what he's been through.
The UK trial was an absolute sham, because of the personal connections Nichol had to the case. If he was a man with integrity, that actually had respect for the rule of law and his responsibility to uphold it-he should’ve immediately excused himself and allowed someone else to preside over the case! I was genuinely surprised that the uk legal system apparently had no *(Conflict of interest)* laws in place, as an effort to prevent something like this from happening! (Well, that is unless you folks actually DO have a law like that-but Nic simply hushed it up and seems to have gotten away with it...?)🤔
This post is highly educational and i hope students taking up law regardless of country should watch. I pray, in the name of truth that JD case in the UK be accepted for re appeal. Imagine if a well known personality can be subjected to such treatment, what more a common person who have nothing. It's not just JD but the principle of justice! The worst form of injustice is justice rendered unjustly!
This is not an isolated case, other well reported defamation case was Maxwell suing Private Eye for accusing him of fraud regarding his employees pension fund? He won of course, but later it was found to be true???
@@remydonadillo5018 very well said! That’s the same reason why his case in Virginia was such a “big deal”. It has almost nothing to do with his celebrity status and everything to do with proving to the world that automatic bias against male victims of domestic abuse/violence HAPPENS-and sadly, it’s far more common than most people realize!
UK judge sold his integrity: all for the sake of a rag and an abusive liar hiding behind the me-too movement. I would question all the decisions he made while sitting on his bench. NO One that has been a victim of dv would act the way ah has and continues to do, and your judge gave into her manipulations and lies via the rag. Thank you for explaining everything from a non-US view. To me, you take the bias and slant out of the US attorney's analysis. Everything you have said so far makes sense, common sense and has the ring of truth, justice, right and wrong. All of the good traits that an attorney should have. Thank you.
I hate putting it this way, but it feels like JD lost because it was an American plaintiff vs a United Kingdom defendant, so it skewed because of that.
@@hlwhhlwh2351 I would suggest someone should review this judge's handling of evidence in previous cases to compare. And I'm sure there've been some since. Either this guy is totally inept and needs to be removed or this guy understood precisely what his role was...to protect Rupert Murdoch...and needs to be removed for corruption.
I know Johnny Depp has suffered a grave injustice, this is public knowledge, I cannot understand why this isn't already getting investigated, a judge was fast enough to damn him, the courts should move just as quick to exonerate him especially, this case is in the public interest to show true and a fair judicial system.
What I find interesting is when a celebrity is accused of abuse, you quite often get others coming forward to make the same claim. In Johnny’s case, I’m not aware of anyone coming forward to say they’d been abused by Johnny when he lost the UK case. Conversely, now that Amber has lost the case in the US, several people have come forward to accuse her of abuse! I’ve also felt that Dan Wooten is rather obsequious when he is in the company of celebrities when I’ve seen him on TV
Please consider taking on the Uk court to help Jonny overturn his Uk trial result. He did not deserve the decisions from what may have been a biased judge and your world popularity would not be hurt by your involvement.
Not quite sure it's up to black belt. Plus since he has covered the case quite a bit, objectively as well, I'm just considering if they'd be like "oh he's a youtuber, it's he being involved for some kind of gain?" Idk
As Mr BBBarrister has mentioned the application for appeal is not as straight forward as one would think from here I can understand why Mr Depp chosed to apply for defermation in the USA it served the purpose of clearing his name I for one hope an appeal can be reached we need to get the partition to reach 100.000
These are some of my favorite videos that you do! Your other synopsis videos of the UK judgment are the best ones on RUclips! Hope you have a blessed one BBBARRISTER💯🙏🏴☠️
Thank you so much for this. I've been waiting for some decent comprehensive analysis. I could never reconcile how the UK and US courts could have such different results.
Because there's three things one cannot easily find in good 'ole England; a good meal, a good dentist, and JUSTICE. Recall the man who defended his family with a firearm, when one of the multiple intruders shined a light into his eyes, blinding him, as a response to seeing the gun. At that point the defending family man took the shot - AS WELL HE SHOULD'VE. He ended up being sued by the family of the intruder!!!! Only in Merry 'Ole England.
KJ, I was born in the UK many decades ago, we have some fantastic restaurants all over the UK. I live in the London area and have visited many locally. As for dentists, I've been using the same one for 20 years. Your comment about the man who defended his family with a firearm I don't recall at all. Perhaps you could give me some more information so I can check it. Where do you live by the way? In Merry 'ole England or elsewhere? I'm sure the thousands of immigrants who are pouring into our country day after day, from a safe country France by the way, will call it Merry 'ole England when they've sucked us dry.
Daniel, listening to your reasoning I also feel this judgement should be set aside and another case be presented to a jury rather than a single judge presiding over the case. Also Amber Heard should be compelled to be a witness and give all evidence so nothing is excluded. it is a shame that they couldn't use the evidence and findings in the American court case in the British trial. I also was listening to the photographer who was told to take pictures of Amber Heard as she came out of court with the bruises on her face and which side to take. surely these close up original pictures should have been part of evidence and they should have been medically analysed to see if they were real and not makeup and the injuries fit what she was claiming had happened. This actress is a drama artist as the American trial has shown, everything she is saying and claiming should be questioned throughly, her lawyers and publicists have repeatedly manipulated the media deliberately throughout the British and American court cases, so nothing should be accepted at face value.
In addition to the Judge's many conflicts of interest, he just made the Politically Correct judgment in favour of the helpless, abused, charitable attractive female against the nasty film star male - just to keep the lynch mob away from his door I just hope that this case proves to everyone that women do not always tell the truth when they are out to get revenge or make money !!
The judge should have stepped to one side for another judge to take the hearing. To many connections, Judge Nichols son working within the Rupert Murdoch umbrella. A Heard having dinner with the Judge, all red flags. Very inappropriate decision by Judge Nichols to sit at the hearing. Thank you BBB for starting the petition , supporting JD, it gives faith that there is someone who actually believes in justice . Love your channel ♥️
Thank you for your honesty and knowledge I hope this case is looked out again # UNITED WE STAND AGAINST INJUSTICE # Liars should be made accountable for their despicable lies
Thank you so much for all your time and dedication to informing us of your court systems’ workings. I am so pleased that you would take such time and care to review this proceeding and show everyone how it could/should be appealed to overturn what can now be proven to be an injustice.
Thank you so much for all the hard work you have put into this appeal and issue; incorrect charges of domestic abuse, and trial by a judge instead of a jury for these kind of criminal cases. As a citizen of this world I can say, sincerely, that any case of abuse is criminal as extreme harm has been done to someone that will have lifelong effects (I’m American). I also pray the UK case is looked at again because Ms Heard is using it as a higher Court ruling because it was a finding by a Judge. There are so many people that will agree with her and not understand that the UK trial wasn’t against her but the newspaper and Dan Wooten; this fact is never mentioned. Again I thank you and if funds are needed for you to go forward please let us know through your channel and Andy’s. Many will be willing to have this over and done with
Please mention the petition every time you post a video. Omg, the more I hear about this UK case the more I am ashamed of the system, in my opinion, the judge had far too much of their own opinion which made this case unreasonable.
Very interesting analysis. Many thanks for explaining that. And, yes, would like to hear what more you have to say on the matter as I'm very upset as to why the UK Justice System should have allowed this injustice to pass with impunity, especially in view of the huge win Depp achieved in the Virginia trial, which couldn't have been fairer. I do hope that your UK System will review that judgement and, at least, allow his appeal to go through. Something was seriously wrong with that judge and his judgement and we, around the world, can all see it. Interestingly, Dan Wootan has stayed mum following the US defamation victory by Depp. Makes you wonder if he's since had a crisis of conscience, considering that he was the instigator of the calumny against Depp.
People trying to say the judge was compromised because his wife had dinner with some person that was connected to Heard or her lawyer, or that his son worked at a radio station owned by the same company that owned the newspaper that the article was written in, I honestly ignore those arguments as ridiculous. HOWEVER, someone put out a video that explained that this judge very specifically was connected to defending the rights of the MEDIA'S freedom to report virtually anything. Had written a book on it with someone connected to Heard's side. THOSE are conflicts of interest that absolutely should have been grounds for him to be removed from the case, as he CLEARLY already had a bias to believe that the MEDIA had a right to print whatever they deemed to be "newsworthy". In the US, he 100% would have been removed on those grounds. That doesn't even begin to address his obvious bias against anyone that has a substance abuse problem - assuming any time Depp was drinking or using drugs during an incident that he absolutely had NO IDEA what happened during that time, and therefore only Heard should be believed. Nor does it address his obvious bias that men could not POSSIBLY be abused by women, as his utterly RIDICULOUS hoop jumping that he does to dismiss incidents when Depp says she did something to him (such as saying she couldn't have thrown a red bull at Depp as Heard doesn't drink red bull - what?! or that she couldn't have thrown a purse at him because she was in her pajamas - WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK?!). Worse - dismissing doctors, nurses, cops, other credible witnesses in order to satisfy his belief that she was abused.
I’ve recently gone back and watched a few videos about the UK trial that were posted when it happened. It’s heartbreaking, knowing what we all know now, that most people believed Amber. I believed her too and I feel horribly guilty now for doing so. It is painful to think about how Johnny must have been feeling for all of those years. I’m so glad that he was able to finally expose her and reclaim his life and reputation. Much love to Johnny and all of those out there that have helped to expose the lies of an abuser and clear his name ❤️❤️❤️
“…She (AH) hadn’t yet decided to go public…” (facts not in evidence) FYI: also not in evidence - during trial proceedings, AH ‘hobnobs’ w/ Judges Wife at a posh party that did go public. Judges step-son also at said party, and step-son employed by a subsidiary of NGN (defendant) Hmmm, MeThinks all three : AH pushed ‘em into Rain-Lake-Pool
Great work Daniel. I feel this case may eventually change how these cases are heard. There must be more accountability with Judges that have some kind of link to a person before them. It’s clear to see you are a fan of truth and justice, and I personally am thankful for people like you who seek to ensure justice is done. This is such an admiral trait. Wishing you success in over-turning this verdict and once again showing our justice system is one to be respected! Currently this case has lost so much faith in our system, home and abroad. Should judge Nicholls have heard this case considering his links to Mr Wooten and the media mogul and great manipulative master, Mr Murdoch. If it isn’t already a stipulation that no judge should hear a case where he has any connection, then maybe a petition to make it so?
I am soo glad that you are breaking down all of this about the UK case. As an American, I couldn't understand how the judge reached the decision they did. Now, with your analysis, I understand more about the specifics and think that this verdict should definitely be revisited, especially in light of the VA case and verdict.
Thank you so much for this Daniel. What did you make of AH being allowed to sit in for the whole of the UK trial, before giving her evidence or being subject to recall, when she was just a witness in the UK? Surely that's against procedure, and she shouldn't have sat in the whole UK trial prior to her own testimony? Caroline Pykles who has followed this since the divorce proceedings (as it smelled fishy to her), said AH sitting in for the whole of the UK trial allowed her to write 7 different witness statements, that were ammended according to each testimony she heard before her own -- I am unsure if she meant the statements were for the UK trial, or for the USA trial, but Pykles seemed to imply it was for the UK courts.... I'll try to find the section of video. I can go for half an hour on a video like this, as you set it out so clearly. But 20 minutes little bites to replay and digest is also good..... You make what could potentially be a dry topic for many, really interesting. Thank you. ...... Still rethinking if I should do full legal training afterall, but I know I can't handle any kind of stress currently.
exactly! Is not a "reasoned finding", but a *reasoned addition* Judge: "She is saying the truth, poor wife, what can I add to help her...? Imust reason an addition to season her petition."
I’m impressed by your integrity, and respect for justice. It is a measure of your character that you would invest your time and effort to right any wrongs, (without ad hominem) with information, transparency and the education of your viewers always in your sights. I applaud you Sir! 🙏🏻
Thank you for breaking down the reasons for the appeal. Imo, I watched with interest the credibility of the witness, focussing on the donation, which I understand was discussed at the appeal hearing. The argument that a high volume of requests had been made for evidence of donations, was ignored and had now come to light. I understand the judges ruled because a question had not been asked in the trial or at closing, new evidence of the donations could not be allowed? Also found it odd AH and WH were allowed to sit in court as witnesses.
Thank you for making legal situations simple for a lay person. Its really appreciated. Many thanks too for everything you are doing in the UK to make a wrong done to Johnny Depp right. Knowing you are putting your neck on chopping block. Hopefully this injustice doesnt happen to any other innocent person. Mistakes do happen no one is perfect thank you for making a point to fix this mistake truth always finds its way to the top for all to see keep your videos coming 💜💜💜💜 we all need someone like you in our corner for justice
Thank you! I’ve been saying the same thing about his judgment. He literally filled in blanks, trying to make her story make sense for her. He added things in the judgement that were so bias that I can’t believe this did not get an appeal
I have found this so interesting that I am going back to the beginning to listen to this again. So clear and unbiased. The facts and nothing but the facts. It’s simple! Thank you for making this and sharing.
Bravo for wanting to correct a UK court decision that could be overturned when facts outweigh feelings, however I think the SUN pulls a lot of strings, let’s see if the court is influenced by the “power of the SUN”
Thank you for all your excellent work on this. I think most of us who watched the US trial and saw AH for what she is are sick of having the UK result being cast about not only to vindicate her but to continue to promote her lies.
Thank you for your description as to why & yes most of us agree with you. It is a pity that they couldn’t bring it to court in America. I do appreciate your content, teaching me in my 60’s yay 😁
In American law a lawyer directly questioning their client wants the client to tell the story and so the lawyer asks open ended questions. In cross examination the other side’s lawyer tells the story so they ask questions that suggest their client’s position and narrative. I think Camille Vasquez in the Depp v. Heard trial showed brilliantly how to do a cross examination that pointed out Heard’s contradictions in her direct testimony versus Vasquez’s questions. The more prepared an attorney is the better they do obviously. Depp’s legal team used the way Heard answered questions in the UK to prepare for her to deny Vasquez’s questions and prepare essentially receipts showing her proof that Heard was contradicting or lying. Thanks. Fascinating!
I would love to see a video about the laws regarding the royal family. What is the queens actual responsibility and what powers, if any, does she have?
Thank you for this Daniel. I have signed your petition but am I being terribly cynical in my belief that the appeal won’t be granted by simple dint of the fact that the British justice system wishes to avoid having any egg in their face at all costs? It is clear and obvious that the trail judge was anything other than fair and impartial so why is this such an uphill struggle? Because Rupert Murdoch is too rich and powerful, that’s why, and because the judge refuses to admit fault. 😡
This topic has been on my mind . I’m so glad you addressed it. I just was interested in what seemed to go wrong or how the outcomes could be so different. Its not like it doesn’t happen in the US too. I don’t believe there will ever be a system of perfection … but we should try to come as close as possible . That requires evaluation.
I really hope that you are able to attain a re-trial/appeal in the UK pertaining to this case as the Judge should have recused himself from this case (due to his involvement with personal biases) and AH being ONLY a witness in this case was allowed to have just her “Hearsay” testimony put forth and accepted as fact. AH is now claiming that the UK trial was HER CASE and it was NOT and this trial needs to be dealt with correctly!! 🤦🏼♀️
Excellent, clearly reasoned argument. And all politeness, as well. Kudos to you, sir. The trial court judge-and-jury obviously bent over backwards in an attempt to find for witness Heard’s party defendant. In so doing, he considered allegations that were not in evidence, as evidence. If you weren’t trying to be polite to that judge but were instead seeking an explanation (excuse?) for the judge’s consideration of alleged facts not in evidence, you might ask what reason(s) there could be for such wrongful use of unexamined claims as part of his basis for a finding for the defendant.
Well done! You’ve done the hard work no need to put JD through this again. It’s obvious that AH lied and the UK decision would have been affected by those lies. He has won that appeal and ultimately the UK case in the court of public opinion.
he need to win in court not in public opinion...The Sun need to start with deleting the article and public apology to JD..JD only can get this apology when the judge turn his ( de judge) decision.. And don't forget that the son of the judge was working for the Sun....so the judge was biass...
![Deep [#Depp 😉] Dive into Grounds of Appeal UK Judgment Part 2 4K](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/apF54wtPB94/mqdefault.jpg)
![Deep [#Depp 😉] Dive into Grounds of Appeal UK Judgment Part 2 4K](/img/tr.png)
This judge clearly had an agenda and needs to be brought to justice.....I thank you for putting your neck on the line for this Daniel as i'm sure you're ruffling a lot of feathers by doing this!
Keep up the good fight!
My sentiments exactly! Please pass the petition around
Judge was related to the owner of the sun magazine Johnny was suing
Well said I agree. It took courage to make this vid, and it's spot on. Hopefully this miscarriage of justice can be corrected. I bet Judge Nicol and some others wish this would all just go away, but I don't think it will. At least I hope not. Justice matters. And this case matters to a lot of people. Hopefully things can be set right. Great vid, well done by Black Belt Barrister 💯
@@junemai8036 No it was the judges son who worked with Dan Wootton at talk radio, it was Wootton who wrote the story for the Sun newspaper where he worked as an editor at the same time as working at talk radio. There was also talk about the judges wife entertaining Rupert Murdock but I don't know if that was true.
Rupert Murdock's son was friends with Elon Musk, and on the board for Tesla when he dated AH.
The Judge, at the time he was appointed to the case, worked for a lawfirm, and co-authored a law book with the lawfirm's owner. AH's lawyer worked for the same lawfirm. AH's lawyer took her to a dinner during the trial that was hosted by the owner of the lawfirm's ex wife, and also attended by The judge's wife, and severel of AH's friends. Those women have been friends and supporters of AH for a long time. Including the judge's wife. And they all published support for AH DURING the trial. Including the Judge's wife.
It’s unfortunate that the UK doesn’t have the ethics rules for Judges that the US does. His blatant and numerous conflicts of interest would be not only grounds for nullification of his verdict, but serious disciplinary action against him.
When there is a desire for a judgement to go a certain way, I believe a good strategy is to assign a judge close to retirement to the case.
The justice system here in the UK is shite !!!
@@janemartin1579 Not just the justice system ...
Alas, that doesn't even work well in the US either.
in Europe almost every judgment can be brought before a European court. Today, when more and more countries are openly corrupt (e.g. my home country Switzerland) more and more important.
Exactly. She was not just a witness; she was a witness with a massive axe to grind!
You can only have "an axe to grind" if you have REASONS for it. Amber Heard is an evil MANIPULATOR ... who PLANNED TO TAKE WHATEVER SHE CAN GET!
There are pieces of evidence which suggest that SHE MIGHT EVEN HAVE PLANNED TO KILL JOHNNY DEPP (through the idiot Josh Drew "white knighting poor poor Amber Heard"). The accusations told to her psychiatrists from the start - if they are even actually given to the psychiatrist and not added later on by Amber herself - clearly show that she planned for it FROM THE START. She changed her description from "a magical first year" to "he was violent from the start" (so why marry the guy then???) after all.
A huge axe to grind into Johnny
Well, that doesn’t matters. As long as her testimonies are thrustful and accurate. It’s the issue here. The judge denied discovery on AH because she was only a witness. Despite the fact that AH had already lied under oath in Australia. This is why the 7 millions donation is such a big deal: it’s an easily proven lie under oath.
@@TheSiriusEnigma Depp's team was also not allowed to cross examine her testimony.
the fact that Elaine is using this UK case publicly as an argument should be reason enough to review this scandalous verdict
What makes it worse I’ve heard some on msnbc do it also.
Elaine also thinks the Public are stupid....
Wrong...
Some of us plebs/bots/fans understand law cases more than she presumes we do...
You can fool some of the people....you know the saying...
And fortunately, the UK decision is being spoken about, and the word being spread, so more folk will understand how JD "lost" but also how Amber "did not win" lol....
i am absolutely sure that IF the Virginia jury HAD looked up the UK trial with all its failures (judge being biased as fudge; AH only a witness, not a party, etc. ) they would have decided more in favor of JD, than they already did. No payment in AH's favor at all and much higher for JD... so if i where Elaine, i would do nothing to raise the interest to this UK case...
Elaine should not be practicing law. Her behavior is shameful.
@@factsmatter8667 she is in her company mostly thanks to her late father, a founder of organization, and even have had some awards for her work. So, this is an example of how a daughter is overly confident just because her father war quite famous in his times and handed over the firm to her, but yet she is pretty awful in modern times and refuses to retire )) Poor staff members.
When I was first looking into this trial several years ago there was a reaLLY interesting chart that someone had made basically outlining the connections that the judge's wife and son had to either Heard or to the Sun. The judge's son worked for the same parent company that owned The Sun. His wife attended several women's charity dinners at which Heard was also present, and shared several mutual friends/mentors with Heard at the time. Those are just the two main connections I remember off the top of my head, but there were...more than just those. If you're going to seriously pursue this you should absolutely look into those claims, though.
Yeah I read or watching something on RUclips about this
That 6 degrees of separation chart was damning to Judge Nichols integrity & dishonor.
Her lawyer was apparently friends with the Judge's wife,that alone should've meant he was unable to preside over the case.
Yeah Ambers Lawyer in the UK was the judges wifes best friend...
@@nomdeplume2213 I'd love to know how many other cases are skewed with her fingerprints all over it!
I am so glad you are doing this. I lost my faith in our judicial system because of this judgement. It was high profile, I followed the trial and could not believe the result.
Try the people you don’t hear from ! The real everyday people! Not the rich & famous airing the dirty washing in public
nah, it's johnny fault at UK for suing wrong people first.
they should sue the source before suing the magazine.
chronological order is important.
BBB the more you keep this in the public eye of the UK the better. There will be people like yourself in the legal profession, judges and other barristers that will not like the UK legal system questioned. The fact a Jury in the USA came to an unanimous decision will have made senior law makers in the UK squirm in their seats. We are very proud of our legal system in the UK and believe that it should be able to stand up to any level of criticism. Due to due process. Unfortunately in this instance the system has failed and that is now out there for the world to see. The Judge has been questioned as to whether he should have even resided over the case due to conflict of interest, that aside, I believe that if AH’s appeal is refused then the UK will reopen this judgement and potentially look at perjury, that way saving face and saying that they were misled so much so that a miscarriage of justice happened (that’s the ideal) the other side of the coin is that they won’t reopen it as it could be seen that we don’t believe in our own judges decisions or that our system has flaws. I hope that we decide on the first option, but I truly believe they will wait with any decision until AH’s appeal is dismissed. As someone who believes very strongly in our UK legal system I think it would be a travesty if we were to let this go and not reopen it, but truly only time will tell
The key words for me were "Choose what evidence she wanted to provide". As a proven liar, why should that not be a justification to have an appeal granted? BBB, I really like your videos.
I have signed the petition and am so grateful that you have cared enough to do something real to restablish justice. I hope the appeal goes through. This may be the only UK case of law many around the world will ever have reason to know. It definitely skews world perception of UK justice.
@Asshats Love Johnny Depp!! Johnny Depp Es Racista!! Do you have the records of Amber lying? Like a compilation.
With a blade? Is that the knife that she gave him? Was it reported to the police? Any reports?
I signed as well!
As you can see, the only support ah has are like-minded followers. The company she keeps....
Stay safe❤️
Brilliant analysis BBB. Your elucidation of the many instances of the judge enhancing AH's evidence, in order to support conclusions that were without foundation, is crystal clear. Good luck with the petition.
I think the powers that be in the UK are hoping it will all go away, which it isn't; but we should all be applying pressure on them to fix this disgraceful injustice IMHO. And that Judge should have consequences for this!
I have already signed BBB's petition, but I feel more is needed. Any suggestions welcomed.
Yes I've signed the petition for an appeal. I hope this wretched dishonourable judge is not allowed to live out his retirement without being brought to account, along with his legal system cronies.
Judge has retired after the case.
JD should sue for the judge for defamation. since he offered public opinion which was not evidence based.
You make a compelling case! The question is: Having achieved his aim of public vindication, would Johnny want to spend the time, energy, and money on a second court trial? Unlike Amber, I don't get the feel that Johnny is enjoying raking up his private life in the public eye.
In American law, there are circumstances in which a verdict can be overturned if some flaw is discovered after the fact. Could the revelation that Amber *hadn't* actually given away her divorce settlement to charity as she claimed be grounds for voiding the judgement? After all, the learned judge cited the "fact" of Amber having donated this money as proof of Amber's credibility. Now that we know that didn't happen, can the trial be invalidated under UK law, without any obligation that the matter be retried if the plaintiff (Johnny) has no desire to re-litegate?
you be a fool to trust brittish justice a 2 nd time .but it here for every one to see .and the rich have no shame.
It will need the Lord Chief Justice to intervene. How it would come to his attention is the tricky part. I think at this stage it is going to need some kind of hard hitting documentary for it to get attention.
Great question!....
The Sun, having previously hacked JD,s phone when Lily Rose was a sick child, had a strong will to ensure JD could not win...
Evidence is the story of the truth and must be allowed to have explanations...
JD was unable to disprove ambers evidence, by design.
And yes, Nichol based his judgement on DONATED MONEY
so regardless if the petition declares a mistrial, or conflict or whatever...
Jd has proven ambers evidence was manipulated, fraudulent, and assisted by others ie; a HOAX....
So in effect, Adam Waldmans statement was correct...
And its proven that Amber Heard is a Consumate Liar.
@@johnstrong5436
Along the lines of the Epstein/Maxwell/Brunel investigation by Julie K Brown...
The length of time and number of witnesses who missed out on justice, in a fair and timely manner...
Just a thought for a documentary...
I heard that Johnny's team brought up the donation as a part of the appeal and was told that it wasn't relied on significantly enough to sway the verdict.
I believe, especially after the UN decision to drop Ms. Heard as ambassador and declaring that DV has no gender, has potential to be global legal precedent. I thank you for standing up for all people in need of a voice. Greg Ellis is another person advocating change in "family law". Both of you are educated in UK and US law. Mr. Ellis has his experiences in the family law and false allegations. Quite fascinating and heartbreaking to hear what he's been through.
The UK trial was an absolute sham, because of the personal connections Nichol had to the case.
If he was a man with integrity, that actually had respect for the rule of law and his responsibility to uphold it-he should’ve immediately excused himself and allowed someone else to preside over the case!
I was genuinely surprised that the uk legal system apparently had no *(Conflict of interest)* laws in place, as an effort to prevent something like this from happening!
(Well, that is unless you folks actually DO have a law like that-but Nic simply hushed it up and seems to have gotten away with it...?)🤔
UK has Black Eyes and No Credibility just like the Show "Fearless" with Helen McCory unveiled.
This post is highly educational and i hope students taking up law regardless of country should watch.
I pray, in the name of truth that JD case in the UK be accepted for re appeal. Imagine if a well known personality can be subjected to such treatment, what more a common person who have nothing. It's not just JD but the principle of justice! The worst form of injustice is justice rendered unjustly!
This is not an isolated case, other well reported defamation case was Maxwell suing Private Eye for accusing him of fraud regarding his employees pension fund?
He won of course, but later it was found to be true???
@@remydonadillo5018 very well said!
That’s the same reason why his case in Virginia was such a “big deal”.
It has almost nothing to do with his celebrity status and everything to do with proving to the world that automatic bias against male victims of domestic abuse/violence HAPPENS-and sadly, it’s far more common than most people realize!
Who's Nicole?
UK judge sold his integrity: all for the sake of a rag and an abusive liar hiding behind the me-too movement. I would question all the decisions he made while sitting on his bench. NO One that has been a victim of dv would act the way ah has and continues to do, and your judge gave into her manipulations and lies via the rag. Thank you for explaining everything from a non-US view. To me, you take the bias and slant out of the US attorney's analysis. Everything you have said so far makes sense, common sense and has the ring of truth, justice, right and wrong. All of the good traits that an attorney should have. Thank you.
He also defamed JD. the should bring a case against him.
I hate putting it this way, but it feels like JD lost because it was an American plaintiff vs a United Kingdom defendant, so it skewed because of that.
No it was a judge who totally forgot what was his role in the legal system and who did not understand the need for evidence.
@HLWH
The judge “forgot”???
A woeful excuse.
Not just any UK defendant; ultimately we’re talking about Rupert Murdoch and a judge that has a conflict via his nephew concerning Rupert Murdoch.
@@pjschmid2251 A very good point, conflict of interest! Was it disclosed I wonder?
@@hlwhhlwh2351 I would suggest someone should review this judge's handling of evidence in previous cases to compare. And I'm sure there've been some since. Either this guy is totally inept and needs to be removed or this guy understood precisely what his role was...to protect Rupert Murdoch...and needs to be removed for corruption.
Thank you for standing up, calling out and doing so with integrity and brilliance of mind. Petition signed.
That UK judge needs to be investigated.
I know Johnny Depp has suffered a grave injustice, this is public knowledge, I cannot understand why this isn't already getting investigated, a judge was fast enough to damn him, the courts should move just as quick to exonerate him especially, this case is in the public interest to show true and a fair judicial system.
Hopefully one day you’ll become a Judge & justice will prevail in UK
What I find interesting is when a celebrity is accused of abuse, you quite often get others coming forward to make the same claim. In Johnny’s case, I’m not aware of anyone coming forward to say they’d been abused by Johnny when he lost the UK case. Conversely, now that Amber has lost the case in the US, several people have come forward to accuse her of abuse!
I’ve also felt that Dan Wooten is rather obsequious when he is in the company of celebrities when I’ve seen him on TV
Let’s take a moment to thank Amber Heard’s team of lawyers for their effort and hard work proving Johnny Depp innocent.
HELL yeah, but a few others too like Dr Spiegel 😳👍🙃🐨🦘
And their even harder, or effortless work, finding her guilty
Are you commenting this on every law tube video you watch? I just saw it word-for-word on another video.
@@creatrixZBD Choose your battles hon. It's not important in the overall scheme of life. Ignore them. Let them comment away.
@@creatrixZBD And why shouldn't he?
Really appreciate your clear concise legal thought process. Many thanks
Please consider taking on the Uk court to help Jonny overturn his Uk trial result. He did not deserve the decisions from what may have been a biased judge and your world popularity would not be hurt by your involvement.
Not quite sure it's up to black belt. Plus since he has covered the case quite a bit, objectively as well, I'm just considering if they'd be like "oh he's a youtuber, it's he being involved for some kind of gain?" Idk
He should reach out to Depp to represent him in re-opening and appealing this case. This is such a monumental injustice.
@@edboymovies The fact that he is a RUclipsr has nothing to do with it, he is an accredited Barrister and his reputation speaks for him
As Mr BBBarrister has mentioned the application for appeal is not as straight forward as one would think from here I can understand why Mr Depp chosed to apply for defermation in the USA it served the purpose of clearing his name I for one hope an appeal can be reached we need to get the partition to reach 100.000
@@sheilacoulton775 don’t you mean his depputation?
I’m from the U.K… what was the judge thinking!!! Unbelievable!!
These are some of my favorite videos that you do! Your other synopsis videos of the UK judgment are the best ones on RUclips! Hope you have a blessed one BBBARRISTER💯🙏🏴☠️
Thank you so much for this. I've been waiting for some decent comprehensive analysis. I could never reconcile how the UK and US courts could have such different results.
Thank you for stepping up to point out the problems with this ruling, & encouraging a thoughtful appeal to be granted.
Because there's three things one cannot easily find in good 'ole England; a good meal, a good dentist, and JUSTICE. Recall the man who defended his family with a firearm, when one of the multiple intruders shined a light into his eyes, blinding him, as a response to seeing the gun. At that point the defending family man took the shot - AS WELL HE SHOULD'VE. He ended up being sued by the family of the intruder!!!! Only in Merry 'Ole England.
That comment deserves many things up
KJ, I was born in the UK many decades ago, we have some fantastic restaurants all over the UK. I live in the London area and have visited many locally. As for dentists, I've been using the same one for 20 years. Your comment about the man who defended his family with a firearm I don't recall at all. Perhaps you could give me some more information so I can check it. Where do you live by the way? In Merry 'ole England or elsewhere? I'm sure the thousands of immigrants who are pouring into our country day after day, from a safe country France by the way, will call it Merry 'ole England when they've sucked us dry.
Daniel, listening to your reasoning I also feel this judgement should be set aside and another case be presented to a jury rather than a single judge presiding over the case. Also Amber Heard should be compelled to be a witness and give all evidence so nothing is excluded. it is a shame that they couldn't use the evidence and findings in the American court case in the British trial. I also was listening to the photographer who was told to take pictures of Amber Heard as she came out of court with the bruises on her face and which side to take. surely these close up original pictures should have been part of evidence and they should have been medically analysed to see if they were real and not makeup and the injuries fit what she was claiming had happened. This actress is a drama artist as the American trial has shown, everything she is saying and claiming should be questioned throughly, her lawyers and publicists have repeatedly manipulated the media deliberately throughout the British and American court cases, so nothing should be accepted at face value.
In addition to the Judge's many conflicts of interest, he just made the Politically Correct judgment in favour of the helpless, abused, charitable attractive female against the nasty film star male - just to keep the lynch mob away from his door
I just hope that this case proves to everyone that women do not always tell the truth when they are out to get revenge or make money !!
The judge should have stepped to one side for another judge to take the hearing. To many connections, Judge Nichols son working within the Rupert Murdoch umbrella.
A Heard having dinner with the Judge, all red flags.
Very inappropriate decision by Judge Nichols to sit at the hearing.
Thank you BBB for starting the petition , supporting JD, it gives faith that there is someone who actually believes in justice .
Love your channel ♥️
Loving the appeal explanation. Answered all the question I was pondering
Thank you for your honesty and knowledge I hope this case is looked out again # UNITED WE STAND AGAINST INJUSTICE # Liars should be made accountable for their despicable lies
Signed Petition! Thank you for helping JD in this matter. Thank you for your time in explaining law. I'm grateful and appreciate the work!
Thank you so much for all your time and dedication to informing us of your court systems’ workings. I am so pleased that you would take such time and care to review this proceeding and show everyone how it could/should be appealed to overturn what can now be proven to be an injustice.
If they are ok with the extradition of Assange, what can you expect.
Thank you for your work into the injustice of the UK outcome.
It should be overturned. That judge should have dismissed himself her knew AH!
Thank you so much for all the hard work you have put into this appeal and issue; incorrect charges of domestic abuse, and trial by a judge instead of a jury for these kind of criminal cases. As a citizen of this world I can say, sincerely, that any case of abuse is criminal as extreme harm has been done to someone that will have lifelong effects (I’m American). I also pray the UK case is looked at again because Ms Heard is using it as a higher Court ruling because it was a finding by a Judge. There are so many people that will agree with her and not understand that the UK trial wasn’t against her but the newspaper and Dan Wooten; this fact is never mentioned. Again I thank you and if funds are needed for you to go forward please let us know through your channel and Andy’s. Many will be willing to have this over and done with
Thank you for your effort. I pray that the your Appeal to the UK Courts will be taken into consideration as a matter of principled judicial practice!!
Please mention the petition every time you post a video.
Omg, the more I hear about this UK case the more I am ashamed of the system, in my opinion, the judge had far too much of their own opinion which made this case unreasonable.
Very interesting analysis. Many thanks for explaining that. And, yes, would like to hear what more you have to say on the matter as I'm very upset as to why the UK Justice System should have allowed this injustice to pass with impunity, especially in view of the huge win Depp achieved in the Virginia trial, which couldn't have been fairer. I do hope that your UK System will review that judgement and, at least, allow his appeal to go through. Something was seriously wrong with that judge and his judgement and we, around the world, can all see it. Interestingly, Dan Wootan has stayed mum following the US defamation victory by Depp. Makes you wonder if he's since had a crisis of conscience, considering that he was the instigator of the calumny against Depp.
People trying to say the judge was compromised because his wife had dinner with some person that was connected to Heard or her lawyer, or that his son worked at a radio station owned by the same company that owned the newspaper that the article was written in, I honestly ignore those arguments as ridiculous. HOWEVER, someone put out a video that explained that this judge very specifically was connected to defending the rights of the MEDIA'S freedom to report virtually anything. Had written a book on it with someone connected to Heard's side. THOSE are conflicts of interest that absolutely should have been grounds for him to be removed from the case, as he CLEARLY already had a bias to believe that the MEDIA had a right to print whatever they deemed to be "newsworthy". In the US, he 100% would have been removed on those grounds.
That doesn't even begin to address his obvious bias against anyone that has a substance abuse problem - assuming any time Depp was drinking or using drugs during an incident that he absolutely had NO IDEA what happened during that time, and therefore only Heard should be believed. Nor does it address his obvious bias that men could not POSSIBLY be abused by women, as his utterly RIDICULOUS hoop jumping that he does to dismiss incidents when Depp says she did something to him (such as saying she couldn't have thrown a red bull at Depp as Heard doesn't drink red bull - what?! or that she couldn't have thrown a purse at him because she was in her pajamas - WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK?!). Worse - dismissing doctors, nurses, cops, other credible witnesses in order to satisfy his belief that she was abused.
If only Elaine hadn't made such a drama about Dr. Curry ate and drank while questioning Johnny.
I’m late, but here on rewind. Thank you for all your insight
Excellent coverage on this. Thank You Sir. Regards, Sharon Harris.
It's good to have a Brit solicitor talk about this. Thanks, from a Yank!
It would be helpful if the sun newspaper apologised. Thank you for all the work you put in ❤️❤️🏴🏴
I’ve recently gone back and watched a few videos about the UK trial that were posted when it happened. It’s heartbreaking, knowing what we all know now, that most people believed Amber. I believed her too and I feel horribly guilty now for doing so. It is painful to think about how Johnny must have been feeling for all of those years. I’m so glad that he was able to finally expose her and reclaim his life and reputation. Much love to Johnny and all of those out there that have helped to expose the lies of an abuser and clear his name ❤️❤️❤️
“…She (AH) hadn’t yet decided to go public…” (facts not in evidence) FYI: also not in evidence - during trial proceedings, AH ‘hobnobs’ w/ Judges Wife at a posh party that did go public. Judges step-son also at said party, and step-son employed by a subsidiary of NGN (defendant) Hmmm, MeThinks all three : AH pushed ‘em into Rain-Lake-Pool
I love to watch your channel and hear the difference’s in each country! Thank you for giving us some on-site on this and other cases!
Great work Daniel. I feel this case may eventually change how these cases are heard.
There must be more accountability with Judges that have some kind of link to a person before them.
It’s clear to see you are a fan of truth and justice, and I personally am thankful for people like you who seek to ensure justice is done. This is such an admiral trait.
Wishing you success in over-turning this verdict and once again showing our justice system is one to be respected! Currently this case has lost so much faith in our system, home and abroad.
Should judge Nicholls have heard this case considering his links to Mr Wooten and the media mogul and great manipulative master, Mr Murdoch.
If it isn’t already a stipulation that no judge should hear a case where he has any connection, then maybe a petition to make it so?
Well done 👍 for posting this. I always admire a person who isn't afraid to speak out about the wrong that's been done. Thankyou 💙
I am soo glad that you are breaking down all of this about the UK case. As an American, I couldn't understand how the judge reached the decision they did. Now, with your analysis, I understand more about the specifics and think that this verdict should definitely be revisited, especially in light of the VA case and verdict.
Thank you so much for this Daniel.
What did you make of AH being allowed to sit in for the whole of the UK trial, before giving her evidence or being subject to recall, when she was just a witness in the UK? Surely that's against procedure, and she shouldn't have sat in the whole UK trial prior to her own testimony?
Caroline Pykles who has followed this since the divorce proceedings (as it smelled fishy to her), said AH sitting in for the whole of the UK trial allowed her to write 7 different witness statements, that were ammended according to each testimony she heard before her own -- I am unsure if she meant the statements were for the UK trial, or for the USA trial, but Pykles seemed to imply it was for the UK courts.... I'll try to find the section of video.
I can go for half an hour on a video like this, as you set it out so clearly. But 20 minutes little bites to replay and digest is also good..... You make what could potentially be a dry topic for many, really interesting. Thank you.
...... Still rethinking if I should do full legal training afterall, but I know I can't handle any kind of stress currently.
I am so behind, so will binge watch as soon as I get the time. It is well worth it!
Signed & chipped in to spread the word .
Oh yay! I really look forward to an explanation as to why JD lost in the UK. This will be so interesting
exactly! Is not a "reasoned finding", but a *reasoned addition*
Judge: "She is saying the truth, poor wife, what can I add to help her...? Imust reason an addition to season her petition."
Excellent! Thank you so much for your interest and time
Agree...needs to be corrected! Thank you!
Great analysis thank you. Yes please more
I’m impressed by your integrity, and respect for justice. It is a measure of your character that you would invest your time and effort to right any wrongs, (without ad hominem) with information, transparency and the education of your viewers always in your sights. I applaud you Sir! 🙏🏻
Thank you for covering this topic and covering it so well.
Thank you for breaking down the reasons for the appeal. Imo, I watched with interest the credibility of the witness, focussing on the donation, which I understand was discussed at the appeal hearing. The argument that a high volume of requests had been made for evidence of donations, was ignored and had now come to light. I understand the judges ruled because a question had not been asked in the trial or at closing, new evidence of the donations could not be allowed? Also found it odd AH and WH were allowed to sit in court as witnesses.
Telling that the Judge was retired off only months later.
Thank you for making legal situations simple for a lay person. Its really appreciated. Many thanks too for everything you are doing in the UK to make a wrong done to Johnny Depp right. Knowing you are putting your neck on chopping block. Hopefully this injustice doesnt happen to any other innocent person. Mistakes do happen no one is perfect thank you for making a point to fix this mistake truth always finds its way to the top for all to see keep your videos coming 💜💜💜💜 we all need someone like you in our corner for justice
La pétition est signée et la vidéo partagée sur Twitter !!! Merciiiiiii
Please talk about the R. Kelly case it is quite serious! When was a star sentenced to 30 years in jail for child sex-trafficking?!
From all I’ve seen from this case it seems like the judge had made a judgment before the case even started.
Thank you! I’ve been saying the same thing about his judgment. He literally filled in blanks, trying to make her story make sense for her. He added things in the judgement that were so bias that I can’t believe this did not get an appeal
I have found this so interesting that I am going back to the beginning to listen to this again. So clear and unbiased. The facts and nothing but the facts. It’s simple! Thank you for making this and sharing.
LOVE THIS ANALYSIS. PLEASE CONTINUE. And thank you for your matter-of-fact thoroughness and understandable narrative. Wishing you the best
my with you on this and i have put my name to it . thank you
Bravo for wanting to correct a UK court decision that could be overturned when facts outweigh feelings, however I think the SUN pulls a lot of strings, let’s see if the court is influenced by the “power of the SUN”
Thank you for all your excellent work on this. I think most of us who watched the US trial and saw AH for what she is are sick of having the UK result being cast about not only to vindicate her but to continue to promote her lies.
#JusticeforJohnnyDepp Great work and hoping that the appeal is reopened. Keep fighting for TRUTH ❤️🙏
Thank you for covering this
You are a great person for all you are doing.. #JusticeforJohnnyDepp
i already know why,w/o watching your video.the uk appeal,hopefully will go through.thank you for trying.
Thank you for the incredible hard work you are doing!
Thank you for creating this petition, Daniel. I've signed it. I really hope it takes off and can create a positive change.
Thank you for your description as to why & yes most of us agree with you. It is a pity that they couldn’t bring it to court in America. I do appreciate your content, teaching me in my 60’s yay 😁
Thank you for this analysis and breakdown. I signed the petition. Please keep up updated on this matter and the strike as well. 👍
Why Amber and Elaine put they won at UK court ? And was prove that Amber made perjury in UK trial ?
Please get it back now to the court!!!
Thank you. Fascinating.
In American law a lawyer directly questioning their client wants the client to tell the story and so the lawyer asks open ended questions. In cross examination the other side’s lawyer tells the story so they ask questions that suggest their client’s position and narrative. I think Camille Vasquez in the Depp v. Heard trial showed brilliantly how to do a cross examination that pointed out Heard’s contradictions in her direct testimony versus Vasquez’s questions. The more prepared an attorney is the better they do obviously. Depp’s legal team used the way Heard answered questions in the UK to prepare for her to deny Vasquez’s questions and prepare essentially receipts showing her proof that Heard was contradicting or lying. Thanks. Fascinating!
Thanks! I truly appreciate everything you do. And learn so much
I would love to see a video about the laws regarding the royal family. What is the queens actual responsibility and what powers, if any, does she have?
Thank you for this Daniel. I have signed your petition but am I being terribly cynical in my belief that the appeal won’t be granted by simple dint of the fact that the British justice system wishes to avoid having any egg in their face at all costs? It is clear and obvious that the trail judge was anything other than fair and impartial so why is this such an uphill struggle? Because Rupert Murdoch is too rich and powerful, that’s why, and because the judge refuses to admit fault. 😡
Excellent Thank you for your hard work, your persistence and your clear concise explanations!
YES PLEASE!!! Signed & passed on 100x
Please continue!
This topic has been on my mind . I’m so glad you addressed it. I just was interested in what seemed to go wrong or how the outcomes could be so different. Its not like it doesn’t happen in the US too. I don’t believe there will ever be a system of perfection … but we should try to come as close as possible . That requires evaluation.
I really hope that you are able to attain a re-trial/appeal in the UK pertaining to this case as the Judge should have recused himself from this case (due to his involvement with personal biases) and AH being ONLY a witness in this case was allowed to have just her “Hearsay” testimony put forth and accepted as fact. AH is now claiming that the UK trial was HER CASE and it was NOT and this trial needs to be dealt with correctly!! 🤦🏼♀️
Excellent, clearly reasoned argument. And all politeness, as well. Kudos to you, sir. The trial court judge-and-jury obviously bent over backwards in an attempt to find for witness Heard’s party defendant. In so doing, he considered allegations that were not in evidence, as evidence. If you weren’t trying to be polite to that judge but were instead seeking an explanation (excuse?) for the judge’s consideration of alleged facts not in evidence, you might ask what reason(s) there could be for such wrongful use of unexamined claims as part of his basis for a finding for the defendant.
So happy you’re doing this!!
Well done! You’ve done the hard work no need to put JD through this again. It’s obvious that AH lied and the UK decision would have been affected by those lies. He has won that appeal and ultimately the UK case in the court of public opinion.
he need to win in court not in public opinion...The Sun need to start with deleting the article and public apology to JD..JD only can get this apology when the judge turn his ( de judge) decision.. And don't forget that the son of the judge was working for the Sun....so the judge was biass...
Bravo... this is a perfect Chokusuki. Great work. Really looking forward to your next video on the subject.