Tap to unmute

When Russian Engineers Tested China's Su-27 Copy - They Refused to Fly It Back to Moscow

Share
Embed
  • Published on Mar 10, 2026

Comments •

  • @SlenderGhost23
    @SlenderGhost23 Month ago +463

    Russia got cash and political survival; China got the blueprints. Both sides knew exactly what the deal was

    • @chijen2010
      @chijen2010 Month ago +30

      Not to mention China is way past this ancient Russian stuff. Just look at the Chinese 6th Gen. I tend to believe China’s view that Russians didn’t keep promised updates so China had to go alone.

    • @AndrewTubbiolo
      @AndrewTubbiolo Month ago +11

      The US business sector did the same thing, knowing the same thing, and having the same thing done to them.

    • @BobbyGeneric145
      @BobbyGeneric145 Month ago

      You still have Chinese pilots flying it, so.......

    • @felixsu375
      @felixsu375 Month ago +37

      It's funny how the narrator calls it espionage when the tech was purchased in broad daylight.

    • @backpackpepelon3867
      @backpackpepelon3867 Month ago +42

      ​@felixsu375the agenda here is to make it like China sounds untrustworthy. It won't work if you use common sense to see it just a trade made by both desperate party, Russia need funds for survival, and China need tech for the same reason. But of course, plenty of idiots will fell for this hate agendas against China.

  • @WhoAmI307-u9e
    @WhoAmI307-u9e Month ago +391

    You didnt talk about 100s of laid off russian ac engineers who got jobs from Chinese companies. They helped china in copying many parts .

    • @andreim841
      @andreim841 Month ago +30

      Not really...The Chinese wanted to buy the license for the SU 27 and the Russian said NO, then they wanted to buy a couple of SU 27 from Russia and the Russians said NO again. And here comes into play the newly independent Ukraine that says...hey...we'll sell you a couple of SU 27s for you to revers engineer and since we are at it would you like to buy a half built Russian carrier ?

    • @razor1uk610
      @razor1uk610 Month ago +13

      ​@andreim841
      Well the Russians did steal or 'Centralize' the wealth from its Soviet 'fellow nations'/'vassal states', which during the fall of the Iron Curtain & Sovietism, Ukraine was left as per typical Russian efforts, extremely poor, indebted & unusually, a centre of advanced.. technical design, manufacturing, industrial skills, ..because Ukraine had always been amongst the smartest polity andtge most capable of the Soviet Republics, partly to prove their worth to the St.Putinsberger/Muscovite Russians (to lessen the chance of being starved, Gulaged or shot )

    • @jma7889
      @jma7889 Month ago +4

      More help were from Ukraine

    • @alexanders6474
      @alexanders6474 Month ago +13

      ​@razor1uk610What nonsense. Russia industrialized rural, agrarian Ukraine, building factories and transferring design bureaus, from locomotive plants and shipyards of the Russian Empire to the aerospace industry (the Antonov bureau was transferred from Novosibirsk, and the OKB-586 was also created by them), the automobile industry, and so on.
      After the collapse of the Soviet Union, all the accumulated wealth remained in the republics. The Ukrainians were very happy about that, calling themselves a "second France" in wealth and income. Unfortunately, it didn't work out: they were never able to build ships, and Soviet-era locomotives are still in use there. Even airplanes and missiles were built only with Russian assistance and as long as Russia needed them. They never built anything of their own without Russian help. The rural mentality was only enough to sell off the Soviet legacy.
      Do you know why Russia is the successor state to the USSR and the Russian Empire? Partly because Russia preserved all international treaties and paid off all the debts of the Soviet Union, while all the other republics rejected this “inheritance.”

    • @alexanders6474
      @alexanders6474 Month ago +2

      @jma7889 They sold off the entire Soviet legacy for cheap and are proud of it. 😂

  • @virgilio6349
    @virgilio6349 Month ago +482

    Russia: "Ithought you only did this to the US"
    China: "You have to understand that..."
    Russia: "I THOUGHT WE HAD SOMETHING SPECIAL!!"

    • @DipntheVic
      @DipntheVic Month ago +8

      This is hilarious. I had to screenshot this.

    • @dishmanw
      @dishmanw Month ago +30

      Companies in China do that each other. What makes you think they’d treat outsiders differently.

    • @mikelouis9389
      @mikelouis9389 Month ago +12

      Scorpions gonna scorpion and china's gonna Chinese. Durrrrr

    • @damiang888
      @damiang888 Month ago +34

      The Russians: LOOK AT WHAT YOU DID!! 😱😱😱
      The Chinese: YES! LOOK AT WHAT WE DID!😁😁😁

    • @bigbangrafa8435
      @bigbangrafa8435 Month ago +17

      China: "Your feelings for this tech are not real..."
      Russia: *"THEY ARE REAL TO ME!!!!"*

  • @Ansu-l1g
    @Ansu-l1g Month ago +130

    “I don't care that they stole my idea… I care that they don't have any of their own” - attributed to Nicola Tesla :)

    • @gtlover2011
      @gtlover2011 Month ago +9

      J36? J50?

    • @areshera4039
      @areshera4039 Month ago +1

      @gtlover2011 Not proven in any combat. A Russian engineer said that the Chinese make their weapons like toys

    • @accountantthe3394
      @accountantthe3394 29 days ago +2

      ​@areshera4039By that logic, US is outclassed by "toys" lol

    • @DanBolton-my9bx
      @DanBolton-my9bx 28 days ago +2

      @a@areshera4039no 5th gen fighter has been tested in real combat

    • @tg2498
      @tg2498 27 days ago

      ​@areshera4039you conveniently forget May 7, 2025 air combat 😮

  • @yutakago1736
    @yutakago1736 Month ago +589

    Initially, the Russia only want to sell the MiG-29. However, after comparing the performance with Su-27. They realized that Su-27 is more superior. The Su-27 is like a fixed wing F-14. China J-11B is complete redesigns with Western radar and avionics. To prevent reverse engineering of the Su-35 engine, the Russian welded some of the parts instead of using screws. This make it impossible to disassemble the engine without destroying it.

    • @МаксимА-й2м
      @МаксимА-й2м Month ago +65

      The Su-27 was more of an analog of the F15 (or F18). The F14's counterpart was the Mig-23 (also with a variable wing and released even slightly earlier than the F14).

    • @bobsink624
      @bobsink624 Month ago +37

      Don't flatter yourself, F-14 is nowhere close to Su-27, Su-27 was better than both F-16 and F-15, that's the reason why F-22 was needed immediately after US realize the Soviet was making Su-27.

    • @ry0usama511
      @ry0usama511 Month ago +33

      ​@bobsink624 isn't F-15 a result of them overestimate MIG-25

    • @JCNEOHK
      @JCNEOHK Month ago +15

      Western radar?😂

    • @bobsink624
      @bobsink624 Month ago +10

      @ry0usama511 F-15 was a partial copy of Mig-25

  • @vic5015
    @vic5015 Month ago +49

    Yeah. The terms of agreements are rarely self-enforcing unless major efforts are made to make them that way.

  • @tkboxer
    @tkboxer Month ago +290

    I have to say, the SU-27 is one of the most beautiful aircraft these eyes have ever seen.

    • @SteveW-lb2hc
      @SteveW-lb2hc Month ago +12

      I agree beautiful looking machine, another of my favourites is the now largely redundant Phantom.

    • @51cmark
      @51cmark Month ago +5

      @SteveW-lb2hclook at it very closely. The panels look like they were put together with a balping hammer. I seen one at an air show in Singapore in the mid 1990’s. It is a good looking plane that I agree.

    • @JohnHawco-x3z5l
      @JohnHawco-x3z5l Month ago +9

      ​​@SteveW-lb2hcthe Phantom is badass looking. If I had a choice of any fighter plane to fly it would be the lead sled. Proof that even a brick could fly with powerful enough engines.

    • @PFCAhammed
      @PFCAhammed Month ago +4

      ​@SteveW-lb2hcagreed, the phantom is a beautiful bird. Hard to believe it made its maiden voyage close to 70 years ago. Still looks the part imo

    • @TougeGrandTour
      @TougeGrandTour Month ago +14

      MIG 29 is not bad looking too

  • @josh656
    @josh656 Month ago +11

    I’ve always loved the Su-27. The blue camo liveries are great.

  • @Veritas419
    @Veritas419 Month ago +63

    The algorithm brought me here, glad it did

  • @alankarenthompson1404
    @alankarenthompson1404 Month ago +10

    Outstanding presentation.
    I'm on board with you

  • @PhillipBell
    @PhillipBell 28 days ago +51

    China stole tech??
    I'm shocked! SHOCKED!

  • @tylerkinley268
    @tylerkinley268 Month ago +434

    Wait, China didn't respect intellectual property and design licensing? Why, I'm shocked!

    • @bennybs94
      @bennybs94 Month ago +8

      hahahahaha

    • @tylerkinley268
      @tylerkinley268 Month ago +11

      ​​@bennybs94 'translating' that to English adds another 'ha'. 😮

    • @kanestalin7246
      @kanestalin7246 Month ago +8

      I fail to see why China has to depend Russia for parts and weapons

    • @randall1959
      @randall1959 Month ago

      The nerve of those Chinese 🤣

    • @milawee-d1e
      @milawee-d1e Month ago +9

      Do you know USA. Stolen 3 class of MIG. fighter plane. At different times.
      MiG 17. Was flying to a 3rd country to claim rewards by ussr pilot. It’s was MiG 21

  • @10000276249
    @10000276249 Month ago +4

    Sound broken intermittent

  • @nikolaidoynov1211
    @nikolaidoynov1211 Month ago +7

    Great documentation. Thank you.

  • @SIEUTU-c8x
    @SIEUTU-c8x Month ago +59

    It is very difficult for us outsiders to adjudicate on this issue because details of the contract between China and Russia have never been made public.

    • @twood2032
      @twood2032 Month ago +5

      Who care about that contract, currently China's 5th and 6th gen fighter program is both a head of Russia, and the 6th gen fighter program alone is ahead of both the US and Russia.

    • @69ElChistoso
      @69ElChistoso Month ago +1

      ​@twood2032
      The fuck it is.

    • @eduardextreme4387
      @eduardextreme4387 Month ago +4

      Yeah...ahead of Russia with engines and radars on j-20 cannibalized from Russian planes...

    • @man-who-sold-the-world
      @man-who-sold-the-world Month ago

      ​@eduardextreme4387nope. Engines and radar are locally designed and made.

    • @justanotheroglesby2847
      @justanotheroglesby2847 Month ago +1

      @eduardextreme4387china gonna China

  • @hussargopnik
    @hussargopnik Month ago +92

    The swedes invented the kobra in the Draken. Funnily enough they kept it classified thinking of the dogfight usability of it until the Russians showed the su27 at the Paris air show.

    • @SMRMilitaryAnalysis
      @SMRMilitaryAnalysis Month ago +7

      Draken would fall apart in a dog fight

    • @CarlSöderquist
      @CarlSöderquist Month ago +18

      @SMRMilitaryAnalysis The Draken is very rugged. But it was not a good dogfighter. It was an interceptor.

    • @SMRMilitaryAnalysis
      @SMRMilitaryAnalysis Month ago +1

      ​@CarlSöderquist Yes that's what i mean.

    • @Titoscudd
      @Titoscudd Month ago +12

      The Swedes "claim" that they invented the cobra maneuver.

    • @ROBOTRIX_eu
      @ROBOTRIX_eu Month ago +9

      ..riiiiight...the mig 29 already performed the Pugachev Cobra maneuver, much earlier..

  • @aliasalias8681
    @aliasalias8681 Month ago +1

    “Gasp! Eula is sacred bro!” -no human ever

  • @kingryan69
    @kingryan69 Month ago +261

    china didmt respect a written contract or patents? no way!

    • @eman7282
      @eman7282 Month ago +23

      No need to copy.
      Western oligarchs sold their soul when they gave the Chinese the blueprints to all meaningful tech… all in the name of profit

    • @FrankZhang-pj9nn
      @FrankZhang-pj9nn Month ago +4

      @eman7282 really? you knew nothing about the trade. how about Boeing? airbus? Chip? Benz? BMW? Jet engine? EUV/DUV machine? did they sell tech to China?

    • @henrikcarlsen1881
      @henrikcarlsen1881 Month ago +12

      @eman7282 Oligarchs? Why mention Oligarchs? The standard technique of China is to reverse engineer or steal. Copyright doesn't exist in Chinese a vocabulary - as shown in the hack where they stole blueprints for (guessing) half a F-35.

    • @RyanSummer-o2d
      @RyanSummer-o2d Month ago +9

      It’s almost like they behave like America

    • @eman7282
      @eman7282 Month ago +5

      @henrikcarlsen1881the US is the OG blueprint thief - they stole the steam engine design

  • @papasreyes4198
    @papasreyes4198 Month ago +1

    Why does it keep zooming in and out?

  • @themacker894
    @themacker894 Month ago +3

    Nice job. Very informative.

  • @Urmza
    @Urmza 26 days ago +2

    This video shows in great detail some of the nuances of both of these maneating regimes.

  • @colinhall8998
    @colinhall8998 Month ago +57

    If Russian pilots refused to fly the plane it must have been bad, like really bad.

    • @user-rv6bs7jb4b
      @user-rv6bs7jb4b Month ago +5

      Or they were better and didn't want to fly it back to Russia because they were scared of being seen as traitors.

    • @subjectc7505
      @subjectc7505 Month ago +15

      Alot of analysis has said Chinese Su-27s are far superior to Russian one's.

    • @DipJyotiDeka
      @DipJyotiDeka Month ago +14

      @subjectc7505 chinese analysis no doubt

    • @XkMeng
      @XkMeng Month ago +4

      @DipJyotiDeka The operational readiness rate of Russian aircraft has long hovered around 50%, whereas China’s usually exceeds 85%.

    • @subjectc7505
      @subjectc7505 Month ago +5

      ​@DipJyotiDekaNope, western analysis has said Chinese Su-27s are far superior but that's the J-16

  • @ChuckBalls-y2f
    @ChuckBalls-y2f Month ago +40

    The Flanker is quite a plane!

    • @chiefdenis
      @chiefdenis Month ago +6

      I think fighter design peaked right there, the f22 and su57 come close, but anything based on the flanker is a freaking beauty queen😅.

    • @stevengill1736
      @stevengill1736 Month ago

      ​@chiefdenis
      So it would appear! Wow, nice.....

    • @DeEmperor1
      @DeEmperor1 Month ago

      I agree

  • @neilfoss8406
    @neilfoss8406 Month ago +363

    Aside from your great material I'm sure I'm not the only one who appreciates a real person voice narration

    • @BeginnersAcademy
      @BeginnersAcademy Month ago +2

      ik, your voice is not as insufferable as you think, rfk jr existing should hive you enough confidence

    • @jo1948
      @jo1948 Month ago +30

      is this real? this channel comes out with a new 40 minute video everyday. something doesn't add up

    • @janemf
      @janemf Month ago +59

      @jo1948 it's not human. the pronunciation of "su" gives it away.

    • @Spidercat1-w3b
      @Spidercat1-w3b Month ago +7

      @BeginnersAcademy Are you writing English? I can't understand most of your jibberish. Pro-tip: If you're going to insult someone's medical condition, snark, and snipe- make sure all your ducks are in a row. Otherwise, you appear a simpering fool.

    • @BeginnersAcademy
      @BeginnersAcademy Month ago +5

      @Spidercat1-w3btalm bout some pro tip lame ahh 😂

  • @mpruitt756
    @mpruitt756 Month ago +8

    Beautiful plane.

  • @lemmonsinmyeyes
    @lemmonsinmyeyes Month ago +1

    didnt they do the exact same thing with the soyuz rocket?

  • @Rock-hi5lo
    @Rock-hi5lo Month ago +50

    The story might have missed a few details. When the Su27 contract reached half way, Su27 was already way inferior compared to other modern fighters. The Chinese did not want another 100 Su27s with old designs. China asked Russians for technology upgrades, including engine, radar, avionics, controls, etc. But Russians refused to modify anything. Both sides had their valid reasons, I think. After years of struggling, J11 eventually became a better aircraft than the original Su27SK. But still, it was a contract violation even though China had a good reason. I think China should compensate Russia for their losses (later China kept purchasing many AL31 engines from Russia, could it be part of the deal?)

    • @理论经历了
      @理论经历了 Month ago +8

      那24架苏35应该也是补偿的一部分,买苏35的时候j20j16已经马上步入量产了,没必要买苏35

    • @zenden9
      @zenden9 Month ago +8

      Both side have different view of the contract they signed. The China believe the contract signed include transfer of SU-27 produced right that they can modify and produced as many as they want. The Chinese never hide this intention from start. If Russia didnt agree. Why Russia never halt this contract from start for the Chinese local production of SU-27.

    • @kdizzystl
      @kdizzystl Month ago

      ​@zenden9this reminds me of mating spiders.

    • @illzyaz
      @illzyaz Month ago

      Yup hard lesson for both of them anyway.

    • @rytiskurcinskas7179
      @rytiskurcinskas7179 Month ago

      @zenden9 did you not watch the video ? after 95 planes were delivered the chinese essnautally went rogue and did as they were please no longer honoring anything. The russians still wanted to sell 100 planes more as per contract but the chinese dogs that always bite the russian hand did a 180 degree and stopped buying

  • @harrickvharrick3957
    @harrickvharrick3957 28 days ago

    This is what I would call high quality comprehensive overage of a subject

  • @Ericc804
    @Ericc804 Month ago +11

    This is like selling a shotgun to your crazy neighbour who sits at his porch all day.
    Now he’s a crazy neighbour with a shotgun 😂

    • @zavatone
      @zavatone 27 days ago

      Not a problem unless he has ammunition.

  • @TrepidDestiny
    @TrepidDestiny Month ago

    What a timely video. I was just talking about this incident with a friend. It was nice to go back and see a refresher on the whole thing.

  • @hippocreation
    @hippocreation Month ago +20

    This video is well made, except some assembly plant photos are taken from Vietnam, not China.

    • @Timinator2K10
      @Timinator2K10 Month ago +2

      One picture has the Su-27 being about the size of a 747 compared to the ground vehicles around it.

    • @skeetrix5577
      @skeetrix5577 28 days ago

      I am only 5 minutes in but his microphone dropping out after every sentence is tickeling the right side of my brain its about to make this one unwatchable not like there arent a billion other videos to watch lol

  • @fengru02
    @fengru02 Month ago +2

    4:50 what was that noise lol

  • @Chapy63
    @Chapy63 Month ago +1

    a side by side comparaison with the Mig-29 is quite interesting. You can see how the philosophies merged (over all design), and where they went different ways (size and weight)

  • @marysun34
    @marysun34 Month ago +4

    Good unbias documentary

  • @100lancey
    @100lancey 25 days ago +1

    Oh well,
    Buy at least they didn't kidnap another country's president!
    Lol!
    😂

  • @AMOUREDD
    @AMOUREDD Month ago +1

    When the Russia took their SU-27 to the Chinese airshow it was there we saw that the aircraft are still of the same size from nose to tail.

  • @kamuginkhan
    @kamuginkhan 14 days ago

    5:38 That's an airmodel, not the actual aircraft.

  • @e341-o6h
    @e341-o6h Month ago +3

    Great Airframe

  • @simonleyman9290
    @simonleyman9290 Month ago

    Very interesting documentary mate

  • @fahimfazlullah8801
    @fahimfazlullah8801 Month ago +6

    it was the Swedish that invented the cobra maneuver

  • @RoamGaming
    @RoamGaming Month ago

    Love the "Big Sky Country" photo at the beginning. :)

  • @Plague_Sneeze
    @Plague_Sneeze Month ago +49

    This is such a well-done mini doc, truly.

  • @fritzhansen4495
    @fritzhansen4495 9 days ago

    Very good video, excellent narration by human

  • @scienceguo
    @scienceguo Month ago +9

    Only Two crash of J11 and that were not caused by airplane but by engine. December 7, 2017: A J-11B from the 111th Aviation Brigade (Western Theater Command) crashed during a high-intensity training exercise.
    Early 2007-2009 Groundings: During the initial rollout of the J-11B (the variant with Chinese WS-10 engines), an entire regiment's worth of aircraft was reportedly grounded for an extended period.

    • @MelosWoodlanders
      @MelosWoodlanders Month ago

      China's advanced planes never crash. That's just western propaganda. Go away CIA propagandist.

  • @richardkusiolek5198
    @richardkusiolek5198 Month ago +1

    I SPENT TIME IN CHINA DURING THIS PERIOD....GREAT ANALYSIS. THANKS

  • @erad67
    @erad67 Month ago +17

    So, China acted like ... China. Surprise! LOL

  • @tou-la
    @tou-la 27 days ago

    Wow didn’t think I would have enjoyed this video as much as I did.

  • @lukethedrifter8302
    @lukethedrifter8302 Month ago +7

    Great video man, super interesting. It's so fascinating how China and Russia's geopolitics bounce back and forth. They seem to be each other's necessary evil. lol

  • @birmallowchakraborty9547

    Nicely explained! Keep it up

  • @michaelmoore6484
    @michaelmoore6484 Month ago +5

    In this video I would only change the sound a bit - there are many weird-sounding pauses between sentences.

    • @SebaztienHawke-ci5hm
      @SebaztienHawke-ci5hm Month ago +1

      Just where audio file sections are cut/pasted together, I think

    • @areshera4039
      @areshera4039 Month ago

      @SebaztienHawke-ci5hm No, he has most likely used Adobe's Enhanced Speech app. It removes background noise but makes pauses sound robotic

  • @letdag00dxsrolll
    @letdag00dxsrolll Month ago

    looks like a twin engine falcon

  • @biboli9986
    @biboli9986 Month ago +54

    Just want to clarify, China has not sold Any Su27 or its variants on the international market so far and no plan to do so in the future.

    • @naacrinternational6970
      @naacrinternational6970 Month ago +20

      And nobody with a brain wants them, anyway.

    • @biboli9986
      @biboli9986 Month ago +21

      @naacrinternational6970Anybody with a brain to process up to date information would know the best flanker model is now produced in China. He should also know China is now the only country that has working 6 gen fighter models flying. The next up is the USA with brilliant PPT illustrations😂

    • @zenden9
      @zenden9 Month ago +16

      @naacrinternational6970 Nice try shimao bot... Pakistan Air Force want to buy J-16 and its the most advance variant of Flanker. China refuse to sell..

    • @Kch-ju6pf
      @Kch-ju6pf Month ago +8

      @naacrinternational6970 Why? You don't have one now, do you?

    • @Kch-ju6pf
      @Kch-ju6pf Month ago

      @zenden9 Nice try Bund-It-In. It was never offered to Pakistan. Try selling your Dosa-Tejas.

  • @obj4298
    @obj4298 Month ago

    Very detail analysis...impossible to be this detailed.
    PsyOps!

  • @WDLC1911
    @WDLC1911 Month ago +52

    Ask Russia about the AK- and AKM-47. I don’t think they collected any royalties on that, either.

    • @RWBHere
      @RWBHere Month ago

      Russia, royalties? lol

    • @fungames24
      @fungames24 Month ago

      The russian empire gained land from china. Can those not be considered payments of royalties?

    • @micumatrix
      @micumatrix Month ago

      sometimes they did. But the royalities were not always cash money. It could be political influence, strengthening allied nations, getting things Russia/ Soviets needed etc.

    • @WDLC1911
      @WDLC1911 Month ago +1

      @micumatrix, No, Kalashnikov stated that they were not paid by many (most?) who used the rifle. Odd.

    • @painkiller2837
      @painkiller2837 Month ago +1

      Just a minor correction, bro. There is no rifle called AKM 47, it's called AKM only.

  • @goshaletun8164
    @goshaletun8164 Month ago

    Comprehensive, professional analysis.

  • @ChrisTennis
    @ChrisTennis Month ago +20

    I say you'll be unpatriotic if you don't steal the crucial defense technology, LOL

    • @themostbestwizard
      @themostbestwizard Month ago

      Yes it's ethical to pay for what you copy but not copying it would literally be putting the interests of a foreign nation ahead of your own security.

  • @robertwhite711
    @robertwhite711 Month ago +1

    Beautiful plane, excellent review and analysis! ⭐✈

  • @spankythemonkey9828
    @spankythemonkey9828 Month ago +28

    Since 1998 the export Su-27SK has been produced as the Shenyang J-11 in China under licence. The first licensed-production plane, assembled in Shenyang from Russian supplied kits, was flight tested on 16 December 1998. These licence-built versions, which numbered 100, were designated J-11A. The next model, the J-11B made extensive use of Chinese developed systems within the Su-27SK airframe.

  • @boutaba16
    @boutaba16 14 days ago

    Ah yes, the good ol upgrade sth I didn't initially have nor developed.

  • @rustymiller194
    @rustymiller194 Month ago +24

    As a American I have to admit that the SU 27 and its later version are good looking aircraft.

  • @onlyhazeremains1365

    Its also simply one of the best looking airframes out there.

  • @estried86
    @estried86 Month ago +61

    China cut corners? I'm shocked...🙄

    • @user-rv6bs7jb4b
      @user-rv6bs7jb4b Month ago +8

      You mean just like Boeing?

    • @jdsheleg8332
      @jdsheleg8332 Month ago +3

      @user-rv6bs7jb4b One is the product of accountants doing the job of engineers - Boeing - and the other of politicians not letting anyone do their jobs properly - communism.

    • @user-rv6bs7jb4b
      @user-rv6bs7jb4b Month ago +7

      @jdsheleg8332 Communism in China sure sounds a hell of a lot more peaceful than the "Democracy" in the US at the moment.... ICE and 2 dead and counting. Yup democracy is working.

    • @shouryarathore7434
      @shouryarathore7434 Month ago +2

      ​@user-rv6bs7jb4b lol a lot more disappear in china, you just never get to hear about it because the Press is not nearly as free.

    • @user-rv6bs7jb4b
      @user-rv6bs7jb4b Month ago +4

      @shouryarathore7434 You mean as free as in the US? Hahahaha living the dream aren't you? Literally....

  • @DiveTheMedClub
    @DiveTheMedClub Month ago

    You're visible internationally Jesse 😅 Upload pls 🙏

  • @EEMV1988
    @EEMV1988 Month ago +7

    What a beautiful aircraft. Would love to see one in person.

  • @bradgillingham71
    @bradgillingham71 Month ago +1

    nice report! well done.

  • @optimusminimus-v3d
    @optimusminimus-v3d Month ago +2

    Yes it really was “heartbreaking” to see Russia’s aircraft industry in such disarray!

    • @razor1uk610
      @razor1uk610 Month ago

      Your sarcasm is kilometres 'thicc' 😂😅

  • @HenryElfin
    @HenryElfin Month ago

    Great doc presented by Chatgpt

  • @peterreed3104
    @peterreed3104 Month ago

    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣karma

  • @Max_Da_G
    @Max_Da_G Month ago +19

    Well, China was DESTINED to become a competitor in terms of military aircraft. It was a long time coming, just the Flanker was what pissed off the Russians. The moment West started using China as their manufacturing hub, it was only a matter of time that Chinese were going to REALLY industrialize.

    • @RobertLegereIII
      @RobertLegereIII Month ago +3

      Negative. Without China stealing, they would still be many decades behind. They weren't "destined" for jack sh*t. They stole it.

    • @Payt-y5d
      @Payt-y5d Month ago

      Should have turned them into paste 50 years ago

    • @merrick6484
      @merrick6484 Month ago +3

      Right now, China is more worry that US will steal their military technology. 😂😂
      The game is on, and Americans have to work harder since J-36 and J-50 were already in the air.

    • @JohnHawco-x3z5l
      @JohnHawco-x3z5l Month ago +1

      ​@merrick6484What are you smoking 🚬? China. Is at least 40 yrs behind in Fighter jets. Can't make powerful and reliable engine.

    • @HeidiK25
      @HeidiK25 Month ago

      @JohnHawco-x3z5l And yet, they are mass producing the WS-15 for the new J-20A they are pumping out. You people need to stop living in the early 2000s and wake up. They have almost caught up, if not already reached parity. They are obviously leading in some areas like missiles and radars. Give it another 10 years and they will have surpassed you completely at this rate.

  • @JesusServant-Z
    @JesusServant-Z 2 days ago

    They trusted China at their word.....hehe

  • @nikitaminin8229
    @nikitaminin8229 Month ago +4

    вся эта история высосана из пальца, автор ошибается практически по всем пунктам. Это не удивительно, т.к. у него нет доступа к реальной информации.

    • @uraninite8151
      @uraninite8151 Month ago +4

      What’s the truth then ?

    • @futurespeak9648
      @futurespeak9648 Month ago

      Sure bro 🤣 what's next? Gonna show us how Ukraine is full of Nazis?! lol

  • @chrisjusino2987
    @chrisjusino2987 Month ago

    I remember when that plane came out it was A threat! With look down, shoot down capability

  • @GankbotShuk
    @GankbotShuk Month ago +73

    We just not gonna talk about the dude with 3 arms at 22:22?

    • @mwanafalsafa3613
      @mwanafalsafa3613 Month ago +8

      😂😂😂

    • @notwo2smart
      @notwo2smart Month ago +22

      Are the Chinese attempting to win the “arms race”? Is this yet another failure of reverse-engineering? (Unable to successfully clone engineers, they could clone only the arms.)

    • @DOOSAY-RV
      @DOOSAY-RV Month ago +3

      😂😂😂 Hilarious 😂😂😂 !!!

    • @aRomanSoldier
      @aRomanSoldier Month ago +6

      The first rule of the Su-27 is that we don't talk about the guy with 3 arms.

    • @thomasw.glasgow7449
      @thomasw.glasgow7449 Month ago +1

      well ah did see four extra fingers but no third arm , does that count , aye !

  • @LeonLKC
    @LeonLKC 7 hours ago

    In an actual military conflict, it is not so much about quality or superiority in hardware or software or even state of the art technologies but rather tactical or techniques in determining the outcome.

  • @oldguy7402
    @oldguy7402 Month ago +10

    Thank you for the detailed explanation of the China/Russia relationship, and how the domestic copy of the Russian aircraft was lacking.

    • @DeEmperor1
      @DeEmperor1 Month ago

      He didn't explain anything. He repeated false Western narratives. My uncle was a student in Moscow when the Chinese and Russians stared patching up their relationship since 70s.

  • @SamRed44-uo6pl
    @SamRed44-uo6pl Month ago

    flanker plus american avionic = king sky👑

  • @MichaelGajdos
    @MichaelGajdos Month ago +22

    Su27 is one beautiful bird. Perhaps the top one

  • @Noapologies-q3p
    @Noapologies-q3p Month ago +1

    was this made in 2024?

  • @Aaronbearon42
    @Aaronbearon42 Month ago +24

    Copying is actually a form of flattery

    • @ragael1024
      @ragael1024 Month ago +5

      not with the chinese :)). the one exception to the rule

    • @abdullahk0405
      @abdullahk0405 Month ago +1

      @ragael1024 Is that why americanos are accusing and crying about it

    • @user-rv6bs7jb4b
      @user-rv6bs7jb4b Month ago +1

      A lot of the world's foundational technologies that ended up in gps, phones etc etc came from China. So are you copiers as well?

    • @A_Laugh_Riot
      @A_Laugh_Riot Month ago +2

      @user-rv6bs7jb4b Yeah, no. Foundational Technologies from China is oxymoronic.

    • @acompletelynormalhuman6392
      @acompletelynormalhuman6392 Month ago

      "mimicry is the sincerest form of flattery that mediocrity can provide"

  • @Thejasond1979
    @Thejasond1979 Month ago

    Hey at least they bought more than one 😊

  • @mikekopack6441
    @mikekopack6441 Month ago +66

    China steal technology??? Noooooo that NEVER Happens...... LOL

    • @timeliebe
      @timeliebe Month ago

      Well, China sees themselves as "The Middle Kingdom",, and thus superior to all other human races-especially ones with lighter skin than them! 😂
      Apparently that's why they think they have the right to steal from the rest of us....

    • @retiredferal
      @retiredferal Month ago +8

      Looks like Israel has competition

    • @eliezer777-r9j
      @eliezer777-r9j Month ago +16

      Yeah...and the Anglos never stole anything. Like gold from India, the knowledge of tea production from China, oil from Iraq and central bank assets from Afghanistan for just a few examples? Look in the mirror before you cast that mocking stone.

    • @EdwardMartinez-r1g
      @EdwardMartinez-r1g Month ago +3

      ​@retiredferalJews don't need to steal they have a handle on everything.

    • @JoeMACofNAC
      @JoeMACofNAC Month ago +2

      @retiredferalnah they don’t. They just sell US and other western tech to China.

  • @dutchsailor6620
    @dutchsailor6620 Month ago +2

    This is how YT should be...

  • @Bob-r6q4r
    @Bob-r6q4r Month ago +37

    The Pugachev maneuver was allready done by Saab Draken.

    • @ludviglarsson1702
      @ludviglarsson1702 Month ago +1

      Yeah, it wasn't publicised to not angry the russkies but dinky sweden did it first.

    • @Digitalsharecropper
      @Digitalsharecropper Month ago +1

      North Korea will eventually master the maneuver in one of their MiG 15's

    • @SebaztienHawke-ci5hm
      @SebaztienHawke-ci5hm Month ago

      Weird that the Draken did it… it’s not the right shape for it, really- all the wing is at the rear. You’d expect it to have been the Viggen (the canards would allow it to lift the nose and control the balance better).
      -perhaps the Draken’s cobra was a bit uglier looking than the ones we are used to?

  • @Winticket7
    @Winticket7 Month ago +2

    22:22 guy on the right...wtf

  • @Matt.Willoughby
    @Matt.Willoughby Month ago +3

    Track 10 targets and engage 2?!😄 Yeah okay

    • @karmac-v1i
      @karmac-v1i Month ago +2

      why would any single superior fighter jet engage 10 out of ten enemy aircrafts at the same time? no need

    • @stop_the_ccpig
      @stop_the_ccpig Month ago

      Avionics is always Russia's weakness at times, while US semiconductors and microcomputers developed FAST. Russia's early avionics (mostly analog) only have two TWS (track while scan) selections. and those two selections cannot display at the same time on the HUD/MFD. Only one target at a time. Despite it being able to engage 2, it is actually useless most of the time. Practically, it can only engage one target effectively. At times they still heavily rely on R-27 passive radar homing, which means the aircraft must maintain the lock the entire time anyway.
      China only started to develop better microcomputers after joining the WTO, and greedy Western conglomerates let China copy and steal their tech.
      Afterwards, China's J(UNK) family starts to have better electronics and probabaly slighly better radar and missles but sucks at everything else.

  • @mikaelbohman6694
    @mikaelbohman6694 Month ago

    Very interesting, but the video is about a third too long.

  • @ericb.4358
    @ericb.4358 Month ago +18

    The Cobra Maneuver is of little use actual air combat. But it looks great at air shows!

    • @ericbrammer2245
      @ericbrammer2245 Month ago +3

      And.. First done by SAAB J-35 Draken's, in the 1960's...

    • @Mark-lz9el
      @Mark-lz9el Month ago +1

      Who cares

    • @playtime6909
      @playtime6909 Month ago

      I always felt that pulling a cobra in a dog fight would give the enemy behind a HUGE target area and invite a snap shot cannon feast.

    • @ericb.4358
      @ericb.4358 Month ago

      @playtime6909 PERSACTLY!

    • @ericbrammer2245
      @ericbrammer2245 Month ago

      @playtime6909 Depends on many variables, but, being a "SURPRISE, Buddy!" Move, the ' Snapshot' of Cannon opportunity is pretty small. Post-snap-stall, the Cobra driver is BEHIND YOU, has the Initiative, and, likely, Missiles at-the-ready, aimed at your tailpipe. The BIG (HUGE, EVEN!) Disadvantage, is the Loss of Flight Energy for the Cobra pilot; He's a 'sitting Duck' for anyone who wants a shot at him...

  • @pyroarchy
    @pyroarchy Month ago

    love the su27, looks like its doing a cobra just sitting

  • @lostinspain66
    @lostinspain66 Month ago +9

    That's an old well known issue. However, I won't underestimate the Russians. They always find a way around.

    • @ПетяПяточкин-и8я
      @ПетяПяточкин-и8я Month ago

      Этим и живём. "Придут русские и нас спасут"😀😀😀

    • @adult_swimm
      @adult_swimm Month ago

      @ПетяПяточкин-и8я ага, пришли в Киев и получили пиздюлей древним совковым оружием.

  • @chrismacbean
    @chrismacbean Month ago

    ruclips.net/video/y5_BPQKfNY4/video.html

  • @dorawang5451
    @dorawang5451 Month ago +5

    Pretty sure was the Israel sold China the American Tech you talking about here.

  • @KunjanChauhan
    @KunjanChauhan Month ago

    Hilarious title....!

  • @shumingtan6885
    @shumingtan6885 Month ago +5

    On the way to industrialization, nations take this short cut to catch up, especially with importance of defense industry, generational gap means live or death. China wasted almost twenty years in development.

    • @skyserf
      @skyserf Month ago +5

      China is already industrialized. They continue to steal intellectual property.

    • @shumingtan6885
      @shumingtan6885 Month ago

      @skyserfother countries do that to China too, if you read Chinese media, there were plenty reports of people sentenced to prison term for spying as agents of other actors, there were only ones caught. Realistically, if a government does not do that, they are derelict in their duties.

    • @skyserf
      @skyserf Month ago +3

      @s@shumingtan6885 _if you read Chinese media_
      Considering that all chinese media is State controlled provide and outside source. Also, what intellectual property is purported to have been stolen?

    • @shumingtan6885
      @shumingtan6885 Month ago

      @skyserfyeah, China doesn’t even exist, now you ok?

    • @skyserf
      @skyserf Month ago

      @shumingtan6885 _yeah, China doesn't even exist, now you ok?_
      That isn’t an answer.

  • @honahwikeepa2115
    @honahwikeepa2115 Month ago

    Cheers from Australia. New subscriber.

  • @GTAGIS
    @GTAGIS Month ago

    You did an excellent job in summarizing and explaining this long and complex episode of the Su-27 and how it goes beyond ! I am impressed and usually, on subjects that I usually know, I am rarely ! Good job !
    🇩🇿

  • @scottlarson8422
    @scottlarson8422 Month ago +92

    What did Russia expect China was going to do? The Chinese have become experts in industrial espionage , figuring why spend the time and money to develop something, when you can just steal it!

    • @JamesStiles-n8j
      @JamesStiles-n8j Month ago +11

      Well, stolen technology can blow up in your face.

    • @xiaowen6876
      @xiaowen6876 Month ago +3

      Russians expected the Chinese to try but fail. It's a pity, but the Chinese were faster than Russians had imagined.

    • @tarkus07
      @tarkus07 Month ago +10

      @xiaowen6876 The matter isn't so simple... as the video points out, it would have been much cheaper and faster for China to buy the Flankers from Russia. To understand China, one must consider issues like pride and sovereignty, but above all, the training of its own professionals in engineering that is the most advanced and sophisticated in the world. Imitating cars or motorcycles is one thing; cutting-edge military aircraft are not so easy to copy.

    • @stvdmc2011
      @stvdmc2011 Month ago

      Have you invented your own paper yet...every time you wipe your as you are stealing chinese paper technology.....so stfu.

    • @SMRMilitaryAnalysis
      @SMRMilitaryAnalysis Month ago +3

      Sounds like America

  • @michaelloong964
    @michaelloong964 Month ago +1

    This video is too long to view, Halfway I switch off too long winded .

  • @jasonharryphotog
    @jasonharryphotog Month ago +33

    They don’t trust each other and nobody’s trust them either

    • @eman7282
      @eman7282 Month ago +15

      Somebody trusts them.
      NOBODY trusts the US

    • @ardivlore6136
      @ardivlore6136 Month ago

      ​@eman7282u besuan asadi me maduron derisa eleatët e tyre i nxorën në shitje 😂

    • @keywacat
      @keywacat Month ago

      @jasonharryphotog ''Доверяй, но проверяй'' (trust, but verify)

    • @gerrydepp8164
      @gerrydepp8164 Month ago

      Who has the most knives stuck in their back? The Russians. No points for guessing who put them there...

  • @GlockG34
    @GlockG34 Month ago

    At 22:17 the guy on the right of the screen has his left hand at his side, his right hand holding a clip board, and his OTHER right hand holding a flashlight! 😂

  • @paullee-sl9it
    @paullee-sl9it Month ago +13

    I have learned about the unhappy marriage b/w Chinese and Russian aviation industry. But this program is much more objective and thorough than the others.