जस्टिस धींगरा ने जो कहा मैं उससे सहमत हूँ।इस मामले की निष्पक्ष जांच होनी चाहिए।और देश की महिलाओ को ये बताना चाहिए कि अगर वो सही है तो उसके साथ सब लोग खड़े है।और गलत है तो वो सज़ा की भी हक़दार है।लेकिन महिला सशक्तिकरण की बात करने वाले समाज मे किसी महिला की बात को जुडिशरी पर हमला बताकर निराधार कह देना तो इस समाज का दोगलापन जाहिर करता है।
इस वीडियो क्लिप को देखने के बाद Hon'ble Justice Dhingra ji के सत्यता , विवेकपूर्ण, तर्कसंगत एवं साहसपूणॅ प्रश्नों की जितनी प्रशंसा की जाए वह शायद कम हो ।
Correct Justice Dhingra your observation is hundred percent correct. Had it been a murder allegations against the CJI who has killed his staff. What would have been the recourse taken. As such when the CJI himself has prima facie declared innocent , the formation of the internal committee and it's conclusion would be a wastage of time . In the present context the correct procedure would have been better if the matter being reported to the Honorable President of India who could have formed an impartial committee containg members of national importance inclusive of two former CJIs. Looking it the nation would have really felt that our nation is great which is of more than five thousand years-old civilization and the decorum and the decency of the Apex Court would have been heightened.
Justice Dhingra has said absolutely right. CJI should not be above the law. Allegations must be examined and it is not related to freedom of judiciary.
Justice Gagoi must be realising now that press conference organised against justice Deepak mishra by 4 judges was perhaps forced by same or similar forces.
CONSULTING EDITOR DOES NOT ALLOW THE SPEAKERS TO GIVE THEIR VIEWS COMPLETELY. JUSTICE DHINGRA APPEARS TO BE RIGHT. EVERY ACCUSED ALWAYS SAYS THAT THE COMPLAINT IS FAR FROM TRUTH SO ALSO THE CJI . THE PRINCIPLE OF NATURAL JUSTICE DEMANDS THAT THE CJI BEING AN ACCUSED PERSON SHOULD BE AWAY FROM THE PROCEEDING AND LET THE CASE BE DEALT WITH AS PER LEGAL PROCEDURE.
I'm 100% sure I say that this is all a conspiracy (game planning) against the Respect CJI Mr Gogoi, but an investigation of the case is necessary for respect of the law As the belief of the Constitution of India
ये वही जज है जिन्होंने राम मंदिर के फैसले को जो 70 सालो से चल रहा है वो इन जज महोदय के प्राथमिकता में नही है। ये वही जज है जेंडर शादी के लिये फैसला सुनाया यानी पुरुष पुरुष से शादी कर सकते हैं और महिला महिला से ये वही जज है जिसने केरल में भगवान अयप्पा के ब्रह्मचर्य स्वरूप में संस्क्रति के विरुद्ध फैसला दिया। अब सोचो क्या एक महिला ने आरोप लगाए हैं। वो चाहे झुटे भी होंगे तो उसकी जांच होनी चाहिए और अगर महिला के आरोप सचे है तो इस गोगई जी के खिलाफ केश चलना चाहिए। ये केस आसाराम बापू की तरह है। इसलिये गोगई जी आप हटिये ओर जांच होने दीजिए आप कानून से ज्यादा नही हो
Office of Chief Justice is not a person. If a Subordinate Judicial Officer or Government Servant is in the same situation, what will be the action taken by these Honorable Judges....??? All Proceedings and Finding in this matter is biased, pre-judged and bye-passing law of the land
विशाखा निकाल इनको लागू नही है क्या? जो बाकी establishment को लागू है। इस मामलेमे उनको जज क्यो माना जय आरोपी क्यो ना माना जाय। इसका यही मतलब हुवा some r more equal before law. N in my view some r above law
Regarding criminal complaint on the lady that Justice Gogoi mentioned in Supreme Court Bench created and headed by himself, the details are as follows: On March 3, the Tilak Marg police station registered a first information report based on a complaint filed by Naveen Kumar, 30, a resident of Haryana, the same day. The complaint alleged that a man named Mansa Ram had taken Naveen Kumar to meet the junior court assistant in June 2017. She allegedly promised to get him a job at the Supreme Court, quoting a price of Rs 10 lakh. In the complaint, Naveen Kumar claimed he gave her an advance of Rs 50,000, the same day on the Supreme Court campus. When three months went by and no job transpired, Naveen Kumar claimed he approached the woman, who then threatened him saying her husband was a policeman. In the complaint, Kumar also noted that Mansa Ram, who had introduced him to the woman, died in January 2019. Alleged payment made in June 2017. Complaint filed in March 2019. After 22 months. Further, the only alleged witness dead. Is this a strong case. The woman has applied for a bail in this case. Justice Dhingra was rightly calling this case a farce and mischievous case.
Hey...I don't know how you become a lawyer or you wore a black coat with white tie which identify you as a lawyer... But, in the way you r addressing a CJI of India it shows that you had passed your degree from some local college and there you legally got a degree of this profession....But, it's shame on you in the way you addressing a CJI of our country...He don't need a certificate of yrs that he is cheap or chief...He is a cji of this country you will rub your nose entire life then also you won't get a appointment with him...
@@utkarshtripathi3350 me too don't require any certificate from you about my competence as a lawyer बच्चा and one more thing a lawyer is not a bhakt or a blind follower of any body may be the chief justice । And a man is known by his deeds as Mr cheap justice has done ,try to molest the girl and then headed a bench to safeguard himself ।।।। and these duffer Dumbo's have to be addressed like the same way because they think they are above the law..
@@adityashantanu48 ohhoo ohhhhh... I was not knowing that he had molested a girl but, what I had listen through sources that the avidence which is found in that it's clearly mentioned with the signature of girl that she tried to molest Ranjan Gagoi after thrice warning too but, you r telling that he has molested I thing so you should through this case once more...And, overall he was not the member of that branch he only headed that and sitting beside because in our constitution it did not mention anywhere about cji...so, please sir first go to the premises then come to the conclusion don't speak bluntly.. I know you get emotional after hearing this case of a girl for molestation but then too first go for premises don't assume directly that the girl is right.. it's my humble request...
President, Prime minister, Chief Justice of India or any post is not above the people and law of India. They should understand that they are appointed and paid by the people of India. Supreme court is a temple of justice and we a lot of expectations and faith on this temple. Truth should come out in public domain.
But why that lady is silent from last 6 month. Now she is talking in election time. She is working in court so she already knew the procedures. Eskey liye dal me kuch kala hai 100%.
Abe bhai ye mahila aur chief justice mile hue hai famous hone ke liye Dono Aisa kar rahe hai. Sare judge milkar planning kiya hai taki unko bhi Tv pe news debate me aane ka mauka mil sake .
Chief Justice Gogoi on earlier occassion was very active against previous chief justice , his cavelier attitude & playing to the gallery like politicians is not a healthy practice. Most of his time is in cases filed by Congress supporters like Prashant Bhushan in Rafael or Kapil Sibbal on Ayodha . Now when allegations are against him ,his attitude is not lawful ,he is not above law.
Judiciary is not denoted by a single person, nor its credit can be tainted by a single person. those who think so, feel they are the embodiment's of justice.That they are gods of justice. Many judges have come and gone, but supreme court remains the same. Its the judges reputation which is at stake, not the courts.
This era will be remembered , in history of India the Justice and Judges were not seen speaking on any issues internal / external matters n issues. We appreciate media and the honorable retd judges coming up and expressing all the evident facts.
@ jaspreet chandel. Not agree. Narendra modi.Amit shah pragya thakur adwani ji.murli manohar joshi .uma bharti. And many more uncountable name . what about them. Still they holding key post in our system.
As an Responsible authority acting the role of Cheif justice how can he judge his own case ? Whatever allegations were ? How can he do as per his own wish being in official capacity without anyone's opinion when allegations are levelled against him (CJI). There is definitely a need to rethink for this post he cant take law in his own hands .
जस्टिस ढींगरा सही कह रहे है क्या इसे ही न्याय कहते है कि अगर आरोपी ऊची व संवैधानिक पोस्ट पर हो तो उसके खिलाफ कार्यवाही नही होगी अर्थात उसे मनमानी करने की छूट है
जिन पूर्व जज की विचार सुनने को मिले लगता है कि वो पूर्व ग्रसित तो नहीं. वो पीड़ित महिला 6 महीने तक किस दबाव में सामने न्ही आई. और क्या वो दवाब अब हट गया है जब उन्होंने मामला दर्ज किया. इस मामले के परिणाम. जो भी आये परन्तु *समय * का महत्व बहुत अहम है और समय ही महिला के पक्ष की कमजोर कड़ी है. समय की किताब को खोलना जरूरी है.
Please Read Till END, Don't Judge So Quickly: I am not saying whether accusation by that women on CJI is true or false. But there should be a proper Mechanism in judiciary do deal with it. I am saying this because law working on precedence set by previous judgments. Justice Dhingra seems only credible and sensible person among all justices because he is only one in favor of following "rule of law" in it's true spirit. Felt sad after listening to other justices due to their inherent biases. If Judges are biased then how can a ordinary citizen expects justice to be delivered by judiciary if perpetrator is member of judiciary (I am not saying CJI did anything wrong but hypothetically if some member of judiciary breaks any law in future). There should be a permanent, transparent and independent (from govt and judiciary) redressal mechanism which deals with cases against member of judiciary, so that faith in system can never be shaken by any such event and our judiciary becomes more robust than ever.
जस्टिस धींगरा ने जो कहा मैं उससे सहमत हूँ।इस मामले की निष्पक्ष जांच होनी चाहिए।और देश की महिलाओ को ये बताना चाहिए कि अगर वो सही है तो उसके साथ सब लोग खड़े है।और गलत है तो वो सज़ा की भी हक़दार है।लेकिन महिला सशक्तिकरण की बात करने वाले समाज मे किसी महिला की बात को जुडिशरी पर हमला बताकर निराधार कह देना तो इस समाज का दोगलापन जाहिर करता है।
Dhingraji is 500% right.
इस वीडियो क्लिप को देखने के बाद Hon'ble Justice Dhingra ji के सत्यता , विवेकपूर्ण, तर्कसंगत एवं साहसपूणॅ प्रश्नों की जितनी प्रशंसा की जाए वह शायद कम हो ।
Correct Justice Dhingra your observation is hundred percent correct. Had it been a murder allegations against the CJI who has killed his staff. What would have been the recourse taken. As such when the CJI himself has prima facie declared innocent , the formation of the internal committee and it's conclusion would be a wastage of time .
In the present context the correct procedure would have been better if the matter being reported to the Honorable President of India who could have formed an impartial committee containg members of national importance inclusive of two former CJIs. Looking it the nation would have really felt that our nation is great which is of more than five thousand years-old civilization and the decorum and the decency of the Apex Court would have been heightened.
Salute to Dhingra Sir, We are proud to have a judge like him.
We are with u justice dhingra
Justice Dhingra has said absolutely right. CJI should not be above the law. Allegations must be examined and it is not related to freedom of judiciary.
Great journalism... Unbiased and unprejudiced...
I like Mr. Justice Dhingra's views.
After listening justice dhingra i feel proud that i belong to legal fraternity.hats off to justice dhingra
I support to Justice Dhingra's views.
*_सही कहा पुर्व न्यायधीश ने।_*
Justice Gagoi must be realising now that press conference organised against justice Deepak mishra by 4 judges was perhaps forced by same or similar forces.
Justice S.N Dhingra is right .
Justice dhingra is right.
Justice dhingra is impartial and unbiased.salute him.wish justices hear what he said.
Yeah
Justice dhingra is abso right.
CONSULTING EDITOR DOES NOT ALLOW THE SPEAKERS TO GIVE THEIR VIEWS COMPLETELY. JUSTICE DHINGRA APPEARS TO BE RIGHT. EVERY ACCUSED ALWAYS SAYS THAT THE COMPLAINT IS FAR FROM TRUTH SO ALSO THE CJI . THE PRINCIPLE OF NATURAL JUSTICE DEMANDS THAT THE CJI BEING AN ACCUSED PERSON SHOULD BE AWAY FROM THE PROCEEDING AND LET THE CASE BE DEALT WITH AS PER LEGAL PROCEDURE.
💯 % right justice Dhingra saheb
I agree with Justice dhingra even media is afraid of truth
I'm 100% sure I say that this is all a conspiracy (game planning) against the Respect CJI Mr Gogoi, but an investigation of the case is necessary for respect of the law
As the belief of the Constitution of India
Right.
Ab pata Laga ki jhootha case bhi hota Han ye hi hall s c s t act ka ha
Ye thik his taki pata Laga ki jhootha case bhi hota han
I'm agree bro. Jo government ki baat maane vo sahi or ranjan NE Mana krdia inki baat manne se to inke uppr rape case lagadia.
So sorry aap ne kiya to love or hamne kiya rep balatkar
Justice dhingra, i salute you sir
Justice Dhingra sir explained it very well✌
Very good justice Dhingra ji
ये वही जज है जिन्होंने राम मंदिर के फैसले को जो 70 सालो से चल रहा है वो इन जज महोदय के प्राथमिकता में नही है।
ये वही जज है जेंडर शादी के लिये फैसला सुनाया यानी पुरुष पुरुष से शादी कर सकते हैं और महिला महिला से
ये वही जज है जिसने केरल में भगवान अयप्पा के ब्रह्मचर्य स्वरूप में संस्क्रति के विरुद्ध फैसला दिया।
अब सोचो क्या एक महिला ने आरोप लगाए हैं। वो चाहे झुटे भी होंगे तो उसकी जांच होनी चाहिए और अगर महिला के आरोप सचे है तो इस गोगई जी के खिलाफ केश चलना चाहिए। ये केस आसाराम बापू की तरह है।
इसलिये गोगई जी आप हटिये ओर जांच होने दीजिए
आप कानून से ज्यादा नही हो
ढिंगरा साहब ने फैसला ही कर दिया
Why CJI is not comming in front of public. Why?
Justice Dhingra is true ,some manipulation is going on it seems.
Office of Chief Justice is not a person. If a Subordinate Judicial Officer or Government Servant is in the same situation, what will be the action taken by these Honorable Judges....???
All Proceedings and Finding in this matter is biased, pre-judged and bye-passing law of the land
justice deenghra is best thinking
विशाखा निकाल इनको लागू नही है क्या? जो बाकी establishment को लागू है।
इस मामलेमे उनको जज क्यो माना जय आरोपी क्यो ना माना जाय।
इसका यही मतलब हुवा some r more equal before law. N in my view some r above law
Regarding criminal complaint on the lady that Justice Gogoi mentioned in Supreme Court Bench created and headed by himself, the details are as follows:
On March 3, the Tilak Marg police station registered a first information report based on a complaint filed by Naveen Kumar, 30, a resident of Haryana, the same day. The complaint alleged that a man named Mansa Ram had taken Naveen Kumar to meet the junior court assistant in June 2017. She allegedly promised to get him a job at the Supreme Court, quoting a price of Rs 10 lakh. In the complaint, Naveen Kumar claimed he gave her an advance of Rs 50,000, the same day on the Supreme Court campus.
When three months went by and no job transpired, Naveen Kumar claimed he approached the woman, who then threatened him saying her husband was a policeman. In the complaint, Kumar also noted that Mansa Ram, who had introduced him to the woman, died in January 2019.
Alleged payment made in June 2017. Complaint filed in March 2019. After 22 months. Further, the only alleged witness dead. Is this a strong case. The woman has applied for a bail in this case. Justice Dhingra was rightly calling this case a farce and mischievous case.
जस्टीस धींग्राजी perfect कहरहे है। उच्चपदस्थ के ऐसे अनुभव हम कर चुके है। मामला करप्शन को विरोध का था।
Bahut achha Aaina dhikhaya Anchor ko Justice Dhingara sb.ne# Salute to sir
ढींगरा साहब सही बोल रहा है रंजन गोगोई मैं अगर गलत किया है तो उसकी जांच होना चाहिए औरत की बात सुनना चाहिए
Hon'ble the "cheap" justice of India.
Hey...I don't know how you become a lawyer or you wore a black coat with white tie which identify you as a lawyer... But, in the way you r addressing a CJI of India it shows that you had passed your degree from some local college and there you legally got a degree of this profession....But, it's shame on you in the way you addressing a CJI of our country...He don't need a certificate of yrs that he is cheap or chief...He is a cji of this country you will rub your nose entire life then also you won't get a appointment with him...
@@utkarshtripathi3350 me too don't require any certificate from you about my competence as a lawyer बच्चा and one more thing a lawyer is not a bhakt or a blind follower of any body may be the chief justice ।
And a man is known by his deeds as Mr cheap justice has done ,try to molest the girl and then headed a bench to safeguard himself ।।।।
and these duffer Dumbo's have to be addressed like the same way because they think they are above the law..
@@adityashantanu48 ohhoo ohhhhh... I was not knowing that he had molested a girl but, what I had listen through sources that the avidence which is found in that it's clearly mentioned with the signature of girl that she tried to molest Ranjan Gagoi after thrice warning too but, you r telling that he has molested I thing so you should through this case once more...And, overall he was not the member of that branch he only headed that and sitting beside because in our constitution it did not mention anywhere about cji...so, please sir first go to the premises then come to the conclusion don't speak bluntly.. I know you get emotional after hearing this case of a girl for molestation but then too first go for premises don't assume directly that the girl is right.. it's my humble request...
Is mahila ko insaaf milna chaiye
President, Prime minister, Chief Justice of India or any post is not above the people and law of India. They should understand that they are appointed and paid by the people of India. Supreme court is a temple of justice and we a lot of expectations and faith on this temple.
Truth should come out in public domain.
Very sound & reasoned judicial vieu Hon'ble Justice Dhingata. wecome & commendable.
Judiciary or Democracy is Not in Danger Some Anti India Co . In Danger
well said dhingra sir
Cji ko jail bhejo
Absolutely correct .media never discus about lady ..is it justified.
Dhingara sir aap sahi h
Kyu ki dono paksh ki bat sunani padegi
Yon utperan ki koshish ka kya matlab hai
I think dhingra is modibhakt
आप मोदी भक्त हैं
No he is ur daddy
वहाँ आपकी बहन बेटी होती तब भी आप ऐसा ही बोलते?
Apslootly right
Justice Dhingra is so excited to speak .
But why that lady is silent from last 6 month. Now she is talking in election time. She is working in court so she already knew the procedures. Eskey liye dal me kuch kala hai 100%.
Oh what about me too then??
Abe bhai ye mahila aur chief justice mile hue hai famous hone ke liye Dono Aisa kar rahe hai. Sare judge milkar planning kiya hai taki unko bhi Tv pe news debate me aane ka mauka mil sake .
Chief Justice Gogoi on earlier occassion was very active against previous chief justice , his cavelier attitude & playing to the gallery like politicians is not a healthy practice. Most of his time is in cases filed by Congress supporters like Prashant Bhushan in Rafael or Kapil Sibbal on Ayodha . Now when allegations are against him ,his attitude is not lawful ,he is not above law.
CJI is not the GOD as he perceive, bloody CJI should first step down for independent and free inquiry.
Gogoi a criminal minded he is not suitable for chief justice
Great discussion, salute dhingra sir
Very true said by dhingra
Dhingra lady KO acchi se janta hai....😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😇
Kyun k ye dhingra v lya hai usko
Agar tumari maa bahan us ledy ke jagah Hoti tabi tum ye saval puchte midia ne sukkanyadevi gangrep pe kitni riporting ki?
She was posted by CJI himself at his own chamber at his residence...
अब इन्साफ के सीरमोर का इन्साफ कोन करेगा वो तो कानुन से उपर हो गया महामानव हो गया,उस से कोई गलती नही हो सकती है।
भारतीय संविधान और भारतीय न्याय प्रणाली से ऊपर कोई नही । जय बाबासाहेब ।जय संविधान ।जय मजबूत लोकतंत्र । जय भारत
Justice Dhingra is right
Right Dhingra Sir
महिला का कैस गगोई के कार्यकाल के बाद सुनना चाहिए यह पिछे कि बाते इस समय लेकर आई है। बाकी सुनवाई होनी जरूर और गलत होने पर सजा भी होनी चाहिए।
Absolutely right justice Dhingra...... Rule of law should prevails...not rule of any court
Dhingra sir is wise n correct unbiased
Gajab dhingra sahab 🙏
Justice dhingra 👍👍👍👍
ऐसा लगता हो जुडिसियरी में भी कुछ लोग BJP समर्थक हैं।जो CJI and RG के बेसिकली विरूद्ध है।
Cji is good personality
Salute dingra g बहुत बढ़िया जवाब दिया आपने, आपको कोटि कोटि प्रणाम
Dhingra sir why don't you listen already so much discussion on her without any evidence
yes, but his point is that if gogoi is innocent then why he is not following d rules? why is he sitting on d bench on his own case?
सैल्यूट जस्टिस ढींगरा साहब, आज भी ऐसे लोग हैं जो साहस के साथ अपनी बात रखी है,
Judiciary is not denoted by a single person, nor its credit can be tainted by a single person. those who think so, feel they are the embodiment's of justice.That they are gods of justice. Many judges have come and gone, but supreme court remains the same. Its the judges reputation which is at stake, not the courts.
This era will be remembered , in history of India the Justice and Judges were not seen speaking on any issues internal / external matters n issues. We appreciate media and the honorable retd judges coming up and expressing all the evident facts.
चीफ जस्टिस को बदनाम करना चाहते है।ये नहीं होना चाहिए।
justice dhingra is writte way
I believe that allegations may be wrong but must be proved wrong by judiciary..
अजीत अंजूम आप कायर हैं। महिला का पक्ष रखें बिना केवल बिना चीफ जस्टिस की बात कहना अन्याय है।
Very Powerful Slap 👋 To Braking India TV
Salute to you dhingra sir
This CJI should resign himself for fair enquiry
Are sardar ji . resign kar de .to faisle kon dega. Aor modi ji abhi tak pm kyu he .
@@israrahmad2716 how fair inquiry is possible till he is holding the post of CJI
@ jaspreet chandel. Not agree. Narendra modi.Amit shah pragya thakur adwani ji.murli manohar joshi .uma bharti. And many more uncountable name . what about them. Still they holding key post in our system.
@@israrahmad2716 sabko justice ke liye court jana padta hai
Laikin yaha toh justice daine wale par hi allegations lage hoye hai
Dhingraji aap bilkul sahi bol rahe ho.chief justice hai koi bhagwan nahi.
Justice Dhingra Salute you Sir
True sir.....justice dhingra...very good trial..
Right
Bilkul shi bat boli sir ne
Mr dhingra bhi usi hidden takaton ka ek component hai
Karma has its own return...CJI Ranjan Gogoi ek din Ex-CJI kuch ese hi Badnam kiyatha bhai press meet bulake...
Where is the justice to the woman? 🤔
Salute to justice dhingra
justice dhingara is best
As an Responsible authority acting the role of Cheif justice how can he judge his own case ? Whatever allegations were ? How can he do as per his own wish being in official capacity without anyone's opinion when allegations are levelled against him (CJI).
There is definitely a need to rethink for this post he cant take law in his own hands .
कोटि-कोटि नमन जस्टिस ढींगरा
Isme theeno me wahi teen patra common he. Yaha per jis per charge lag raha he wo Gogoi, committe formed by Gogoi, decision given by Gogoi.
जस्टिस ढींगरा सही कह रहे है क्या इसे ही न्याय कहते है कि अगर आरोपी ऊची व संवैधानिक पोस्ट पर हो तो उसके खिलाफ कार्यवाही नही होगी अर्थात उसे मनमानी करने की छूट है
सही निर्णय हैCji का
सैलयूट ढिंगरा सर
जिन पूर्व जज की विचार सुनने को मिले लगता है कि वो पूर्व ग्रसित तो नहीं. वो पीड़ित महिला 6 महीने तक किस दबाव में सामने न्ही आई. और क्या वो दवाब अब हट गया है जब उन्होंने मामला दर्ज किया. इस मामले के परिणाम. जो भी आये परन्तु *समय * का महत्व बहुत अहम है और समय ही महिला के पक्ष की कमजोर कड़ी है. समय की किताब को खोलना जरूरी है.
Bhut acha sir
Justice Gogoi so right.
Justice Dhingra Agle ki bhi bat suniye plz.
Jach honi chahiye.
Self obsessed hai yeh justice! Like Arnab and Sudhir.
Ab kaha Gaye beti bachao wale
Justice Dhingra se agree hu
क्या सुप्रीम कोर्ट के सेक्रेटरी जेनरल को फ़ैसला सुनाने का अधिकार है ।।
Last CJI ko Gogoi ne Kya kya nahi bola
सत्य कहां पूर्व जज जी ने
CJI may not be as innocent as is being made out to be.He should be suspended and a through enquiry must be made.
Please Read Till END, Don't Judge So Quickly:
I am not saying whether accusation by that women on CJI is true or false. But there should be a proper Mechanism in judiciary do deal with it. I am saying this because law working on precedence set by previous judgments.
Justice Dhingra seems only credible and sensible person among all justices because he is only one in favor of following "rule of law" in it's true spirit. Felt sad after listening to other justices due to their inherent biases. If Judges are biased then how can a ordinary citizen expects justice to be delivered by judiciary if perpetrator is member of judiciary (I am not saying CJI did anything wrong but hypothetically if some member of judiciary breaks any law in future). There should be a permanent, transparent and independent (from govt and judiciary) redressal mechanism which deals with cases against member of judiciary, so that faith in system can never be shaken by any such event and our judiciary becomes more robust than ever.
Djingra Sir is absolutely correct we need these type of judges nd people also 🙂