Go to ground.news/Gordon to stay fully informed on politics, science, and more with clarity and context. Save 40% on the Ground News unlimited access Vantage plan with my link.
I’ve been using Ground News for almost 2 years and haven’t looked back-it’s genuinely an amazing service to get insight into blind spots for both sides of the aisle 👍 Cool video idea, Jack!
Honestly, for a better comparison, you should have controlled for the gender. Either both male or both female. Gender has an effect on the way the brain works.
Education does more than gender. If a person relies more on lying (female) then the mind games are more prevalent... the more educated the individual, lesser the chances that they cause unecessary fuss/chaos. That means that they're ready to discuss and hardly respond emotionally... (actual distress not faked). I could say much Much MUCH more about this subject, but this is the internet and you're using Trump's face as avatar. Even as a joke, it's a yikes from me. Take care, gents... I sincerely hope for the whole world that Kamala wins. Yes, this is the vote of the rest of the planet if they dont wanna see the USA fall. Ask 2 questions (after assessing if the person you interview is Neither racist Nor sexist) and you'll get a 80%+ votes for Kamala. Question one: Do you think another country should lead the world than the USA and would you let an armed conflict determine this? (If the answer is yes, the vote is nullified -- I d C enough to explain this point) and 2nd question.. what you're surveying for (duh.. if you're surprised by this, the first question probably confused you and you should vote for Kamala because you're d_ um _b
@@Dawnarow Wow, tell me you're a leftist without telling me you are a leftist. HOW DO YOU THINK KAMALA IS GOOD? I would rather vote for Joe Biden then her God forbid since at least he's not alive. RFK moved to Trump's side even though he was a life long democrat since Kamala is bar none the most dumb politician I've seen. Fox News destroyed Kamala Harris."
The main problem is that it was a liberal white woman and conservative asian man. All three of those things (Liberal, White, and woman) play a role in the brain so it'd be more insightful if it were A liberal white woman and a conservative white woman or a Conservative black man and a Liberal black man
It kinda makes sense though in a way. I saw the places they were coming from and realized they saw problems with their areas so they became vocal and probably volunteered to be a part of political studies.
I live in the SF Bay Area. Most of the BLM posters I see are in the windows and yards of well-off White leftists. None of my Black or Asian friends support BLM.
You do understand that the scientist making the prediction did not learn the gender or ethnicity of either participant until after he had made his prediction, right?
I immediately thought that being from LA would be used to throw a twist because law of averages, Californians are Democrat. But then I thought that they might also have planned for that. So I just followed along and I waited to hear what they had to say about ze brain scans.
My first instinct was "white woman = democrat", "asian man = republican" but then they said she was from North Dakota and he was from L.A., so that made me question my initial thoughts.
@@danielmenetrey6876 that's the point of the video, they guy knew what to look for BECAUSE of all the many previous scientific studies done on this subject.
It is actually imposible to know how smart is a group of people, you should study all of em and create a statistical analysis for make a conclusion, this video doesn't runs with the scientific method, therefore it's completely irrelevant.
The eyes are the window to the soul... how many souls did you see? I'm joking, they both have a soul, just one of them disregards it to vote for greedy reasons.😂
@@bennettd1275 Greedy??? That makes zero sense. How about one to focus on Americans or another one that will focus on foreigners? How about one making American citizens more money and the other making the government larger? What about one being a good leader for the people and the other another term as a Puppet President for some unelected miscreant? That makes the most sense to the most people. 🇺🇸
Dude found the only Republican still alive in *Los Angeles. Edit: [Corrected “Las” to “Los” above]. And I didn’t expect my comment to blow up like this. I’ve written plenty of comments I think were clever but this wasn’t one of them. So either my understanding of what’s Clever isn’t very mainstream, or RUclips has been doing a lot of shadowbanning/removal that I’m not aware of.
its pretty easy in LA: white dude, lady with thick rim glasses, older person with small ponytail = democrat (blue no matter who) Non-white: everything else - reps, green, independents/centrists, etc I dont make the rules
@@jasonmartindale3171 Research shows that right wingers tend to make decisions based more on emotions than on logic, but don't let verifiable scientific facts get in the way of your feelings on the subject, eh?
It used to be correctly called a "Studies". It got pushed in the US during the 1960s to a "Science" to get a higher priority exemption from the draft boards during the Vietnam War. They've been gaming the system ever since - including packing the government schools and bureaucracy with their Sciency certification. Basically, the Democratic Party IS the Government Party.
It used to be correctly called a "Studies". It got pushed in the US during the 1960s to a "Science" to get a higher priority exemption from the draft boards during the VietnamWar. They've been gaming the system ever since - including packing the government schools and other bureaucracied with their Sciency certification. Basically, the DemocraticParty IS the GovernmentParty.
@@J.o.e_K Science politicization is not the same as political science, pun or otherwise. Political science is simply the study of politics itself. It has absolutely nothing to do with the covid nonsense, regardless of which side you consider to be nonsense. (Though I'm sure there's a lot of political scientists writing theses _now_ - after the fact - attempting to explain why a virus got so politicized and how it impacted the world both now and in the future.)
@@kathrynbeetham5308 I agree but I doubt there is a large pot of money and it would require a lot of time. Besides, I think the man trying to make the guess was already a contributor in a study that did just that.
@@Haillightmodeyou might not care about politics but politics care about you. They dictate your life in one way or another so you should rethink that statement
@@Nicogsstereotypes are based in truth brother. Secondly, noticing patterns and drawing conclusions from them are normal, some conclusions are unfounded but don't turn this into some evil thing.
One of them is a male and the other is female wouldn't this result in a problem in the fact that females and males are different, for a control you should have gotten another female and another male to see the effects on their brains.
Yep, idealy you either have a much larger sample size, or you get two identical twins who have lived their lives together, but somehow have different political party affiliation.
@@TGAcobalt Obviously this was considered. But at the end of the day all literature points to the same signs - republicans just have more emotional tendencies, whereas democrats have more logical ones. It’s not a “who’s better” question, but just how both cultures work in early development.
Already voted!! No way could I vote for a clown for the sole reason being she owns a vagina. The Mad Cackler, who is a chronic, unrepentant liar, needs to go away. But not back here to CA. She has ruined this state enough already.
I'd argue that's a little reductive. If you look at professions for instance, the legal profession (which fundamentally orients on the use of logic for a career) skews moderately Democrat/center-left, as do IT and most research-based scientific professions.
This isnt the best way to study this imo. You have multiple other differences besides political affiliation affecting their brains, with gender and ethnicity being a couple. The best way to study this would be to try to negate every other variable besides political affiliation.
Other variables like gender and ethnicity also correlate with political affiliation. Your guesses are going to be more accurate if you account for these variables as well, but you probably wouldn't need a brain scan to get most of those results.
One has a compassion and one takes the life of an innocent baby. One lives a decent honest life and the other live for pride, greed, lust, envy, gluttony, wrath, and sloth.
@@reysolo3672 How is telling the Truth about degeneracy "demonizing" or "dehumanizing" LOL. You give yourself away. Just don't be a degenerate, and people won't think you are one. It's very simple.
@@americaamerica8579 You're literally an insane, brainwashed person. It's really fucking sad. I know you're a good person, so are we. You're choosing to fight over nothing
The girl being from ND and the guy being from LA threw me off, but as soon as I noticed that he was wearing a Carhartt hoodie, I immediately knew he was Republican. The girl’s attire also aligns with more liberal fashion than republican fashion.
I just assume anyone living in ND that dresses like that is a California transplant. So she was probably from San Francisco to begin with. I can also assume her parents are school teachers.
Great, but kind of irrelevant to the video (at least if it was produced honestly). _You_ as a viewer got to see their pictures up front, but fashion choice and home town have zero effect on what a brain scan looks like, and gender only a slight effect (and there's plenty of both Democrat men and Republican women, so even if the scientist was paying attention to gender-based differences in the scans, he would have had no way of knowing whether or not the participants were chosen to be opposite of the "expected" stereotypes... or for that matter if they'd chosen trans participants just to really throw off such gender-based guessing games).
@@altrag: "but fashion choice and...have zero effect on what a brain scan looks like" Fashion is one mechanism by which people demonstrate identity to each other. I can't imagine how somebody, provided they are not dressing to deceive, could not signal at least a bit how their brain scan would turn out.
My mom voted for Trump. When I jokingly asked if she was going to vote for Kamala since Kamala was a woman, her response was, "I'm not voting for that moron." 🤣😂
@brianschuetz2614 Moms tend to vote for people who have the best outcomes for producing safe societies for raising their kids. Where as women in the prowl put men into positions of adversity if possible. Like open borders.
@@brianschuetz2614 i first read, she believes kamala is a moron, that's why she chooses trump. but then i read your message again, and my brain to make sense of it then told me, she must mean, she is not voting for THAT moron. since she would be choosing the moron she prefers, it makes a bit more sense. even if kamala is not actually a moron, that sounds like projection (and perhaps your mom underestimating her own intelligence, and just deciding first and baring the consequences later, you know: judge first, question later)
I guessed the girl being the dem despite being from North Dakota, and the guy being the Republican despite being from LA. The best information to guess a person’s political party (without brain scans and scientists) would be their age and sex. Young females are more likely to be liberal and men in general are more conservative, even younger men.
This is a correlation study. It's no different than "bigger muscles lift heavier things". In most cases bigger muscles do lift bigger things so we can draw conclusions from the hypothesis with a formidable degree of accuracy. You are too emotional.
@@jsvalina3503 This is science. It uses data to form a conclusion and repeating the study fortifies the hypothesis. Let me guess, you don't think the outliers resemble the anecdotes of the radical left.🤣🤣
I would have liked to see two people with more life experience, 19 and 22 years old is too young. What neuroscientists' claim is, the prefrontal cortex isn't fully mature until approximately age 25.
i hate the 25 year BS, that comes from a study (by jay n giedd) where they didn't recruit anyone beyond 25 to scan their brains it just keeps getting used to justify ageism towards younger people but i agree that older people would've been nice
Shouldn't. Asians tend to lean more conservative (surprising to non-Asians, I know) UNLESS they are either Lettered Community or those otherwise desperate to disassociate with community because reasons (talking to a rather smallish sampling size of around 70-80 people over the course of a couple of decades, usual cases were they were subjected to some level of isolation from their community,or their community had been painted in a negative light due to Mainstream stereotypes promoted until more recently (Evil Kung Fu guy, Long Duk Dong from "Sixteen Candles," Mama-san war bride, Dragon Lady, etc., etc., etc.) or their perceived fear of the community's reaction to their chosen lifestyle). What used to surprise me about my visits to California starting as a child spending vacations with relatives is just how religious and conservative a lot of Asians were (usually some denomination of Christianity, followed by Buddhism). Of course, until the demographic grew until it became a significant factor in elections, it was largely ignored, so people tend to assume minority = lefty.
I could tell right at the beginning when the participants were talking which one was which party, and I'm autistic. That said, the existence of scientifically measurable correlations between biology and politics is really interesting and the implications are worth exploring.
@@PastaMakerCordy-qy4uz, I'll let Chewbert answer for himself (it will be interesting to see if he saw anything I missed), but it was pretty clear to at least some of us. The man wasn't as obvious, but his Carhartt sweatshirt, and sitting back exposing his body more suggested confidence in a setting in which he was being evaluated. The woman was a height-weight proportionate white woman, and chose to wear a thin top, with no brassiere, which exposed her skin at the shoulders and middle combined with yoga pants. The bangs and particular glasses frames weren't as significant but they were also not stereotypically what a conservative woman would wear.
@@PastaMakerCordy-qy4uz Yes, playing the odds, you can tell, in this case... Young males are more likely to be conservative. Young females are *considerably* more likely to be... uh... "liberal". If you *only* look at them one at a time, it's about a 55-60% chance the young man is (R)... and about a 70-80% chance that the young woman is (D). When you add one more piece of knowledge, the "given" that we have exactly one of each... that there's no chance of 2 (R)'s or 2 (D)'s... then the odds shift to something more like 90% that the (D) is the young woman.
I’m surprised how many of you seem to be completely misunderstanding the point: this ISN’T a “study”, this isn’t supposed to be a perfect comparison… also, how are you completely missing the point that the researchers conducting this are themselves RESEARCHERS?!? As in, they would obviously already be aware of the criticisms that some of you are lodging LOL; you guys are not enlightening anyone here. All this is is an interesting example. Nothing more. Stop trying to pretend that YOU are the trained researchers here; you aren’t; none of us here are; we are just couch potatoes being entertained. Relax.
A smile with a smirk.... an incensere smille.. a plastic type of smile... politically correct glasses to have an image she is more intellectual than she is actually not.... participate 1 was democrat... I was right... Participant 2 was grounded less emotional and was subjectifely more intelligent when asked....
I wouldn't be surprised at all if more sociopaths are left wing. The left is absolutely full of virtue signalling liars who will happily crush their 'opponents' (aka anyone that dares to even slightly disagree with them) in a heartbeat just so they can WIN. Total sociopath wannabe victims.
All the cope (not talking about urs) in the comments is hilarious. None of the left will accept this as truth. They gotta "equity" everything to make it "fair" so dumb.
@@Hk17161 Nah, you're just afraid of offending bearded dudes in high heels who want to pretend they are 16 year old girls. "Global scientific consensus" lol stfu.
what about learning the subject before asking like if it was a blank experimentation? they use this brain scale because it is known for being linked to political affiliation .
If they had been the same gender you'd just ask "what about different genders?" But of course such things are be covered in the original research if you're actually interested enough to find out. Two whole participants is never going to give relevant results no matter what, and the video noted at least twice (that I recall) that the "experiment" they were performing was just a demonstration and doesn't imply anything statistically significant.
I'm an Independent Moderate who doesn't believe in false dichotomies and is drawn to subtle nuance. I wonder how I'd fair? “Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth” -Marcus Aurelius, Meditations
That would be an interesting question. If a person is strong in both brain components what would they tend to be. And if they are weak or equal in both what would they tend too be.
Sometimes I consider myself a liberal extremist. The democrats look moderate in comparison. But I'm patient, and understand that people all over the political spectrum have their stance for a reason. There's a problem with describing our political standing with a binary, when it's much more multidimensional.
@@kamikeserpentail3778 which is why having dedicated parties for social issues would benefit the US instead of turning it into a blood curdling social experiment about who's team wins.
You should scan the same sex and same race just to compare apples to apples. Men and women's brains are slightly different, and respond to things differently.
Right off the top you'd need to define what you mean by "liberal Republican" and "conservative Democrat". A larger amygdala almost certainly correlates (note: only correlation) with conservatism as fear of change is one of the main defining values of conservatism. That said, given the current state of things (in the US) and the fear about what a second Trump term would do to the country, liberals are likely growing larger amygdala at the moment as well (and the MRI tech did note that both participants were above average - that might not be coincidence). The ACC is more interesting. I have a feeling it doesn't correlate to ideology so much as it does to extremism and only correlates to Republicans because they've been trending more and more extreme in the Trump era. I'd be interested to know what they'd see if they could find a large enough sample set of frothing-at-the-mouth leftists (not just "anyone who disagrees with Trump gets called a far-left radical" but true left-leaning extremists). I'm not sure there's a large enough population of such people in the US but perhaps other parts of the world could provide such a set, especially South America where leftism still seems to be flourishing, sometimes well into "too much of a good thing" territory. Of course the research would have to be generalized beyond the US-specific "Democrat" vs "Republican" and accommodate a wider range of political beliefs in order to prove that out (or deny it, if I'm wrong).
I think those overlapping variations have been pretty much sorted out after the great moderate purge of the 2000s, leaving only insane people in the democratic party. The only reason Joe Manchin still exists is because they couldn't hunt him down in those mountains.
@@altrag It isn't "FEAR of change"... that is someone trying to inject a negative context... Instead, it is a *reluctance* to change... and that reluctance can be 100% logical. There's a very old adage... "If it ain't broke, don't 'fix' it."
This comment section is proof that most people don't pay attention and form opinions while disregarding many facts. The doctor SAID this isn't a large enough study and was not evidence in itself. He did say he has seen other larger studies that were more scientific and controlled, and this matched what the larger studies showed. So, although THIS test wasn't necessarily scientific evidence, it matched the average of actual scientific evidence. People on here dismissing this data and ignoring that he said that there have been studies that showed the same thing.
@@comradelade5524 Same people who call other people cultists all look the same the irony if you got 100 dem voters in a room they would all look the same vs republicans are actually more diverse in the way they look, dress and carry themselves.
This wasn't the first test study. Didn't you catch that as often as they referred to it? They've been doing this a while, and this guy and his channel wanted to try it and see for themselves, and the breakdown of how it works.
@@Maridesk-diaries Could be the "grass is always greener on the other side" effect, as well as trying to avoid feeling like you're part of a hive-mind party. Not sure what part of the brain that would correspond to, sorry.
I think it's both. Genetic factors play a signifigant role in how the brain develops, but at the same time the brain is also quite susceptible to non-genetic factors, that can cause different areas of the brain to grow, shrink or even change shape
To have enough data to assume amd be right before hand is pretty telling though. This was a yt video, the sample size from his research is thousands though.
We don't need a larger study. Tons of dems needed safe spaces, cried hysterically, and totally lost their minds when DJT won 2016. That's all you need to know. Plus there have been actually studies done showing that many dem voters take pills for mental health over Republican voters.
If you are going to do this in the future you need to find two identical twins with opposite political party affiliation, and have a much larger sample size. The brain changes a lot in between those three years, and brains between women and men, are vastly different.
I wonder how often identical twins actually do have opposing political affiliation. If brain structure is any predictor, then genetics certainly would be an influence.
@@kamikeserpentail3778 its a good question, and my sample size is very small, but i have known identical twins with vastly different political beliefs, generally because one parent was one nd nother parent was the other party.
@@moocows111111 Since when was there a rule that you could only critique a first person source? You should site a first person source as often as possible, but only being allowed to critique a first person source is a new rule to me.
As interesting as this was, the results are skewed and could be called biased because of the uncontrolled aspects, e.g. sex because there differences in the male and female brains in the areas which were looked at.
SPOILER ALERT: I would have withheld their geographic information. It was obviously a red herring when taken with everything else presented that gave away the conculsion.
"The science is real" *Didn't actually use scientific procedure As much as I feel favored by the "results," I don't care because, they're not valid. It would cost tens of thousands of dollars, to scan enough people, to come up with any sort of validation in the findings. But, I'm giving one of these 👍, cuz I commend the effort.
I knew right away when they showed where they were from. They were obviously trying to throw people off. And when i heard the asian guy had a bit of an accent it kind of implied he grew up in a traditional asian household which is statistically far more likely to be conservative.
such a thorough comprehensive study.... large sample size and controlled for age, gender, race, IQ... oh wait. the main difference between libs and conservatives is the ability to forsee consequences. It has been demonstrated to be genetically determined decades ago.
the fact that you were clear about the genders of the patients destroys the results with data pollution from irrelevant axes, this is a complete waste since it wasn't blind
dunning kruger effect.... This is based studies on more or less large samples of peoples, then here the main difference is the ideological orientation, not the sex.
This isn't a scientific experiment. It is a demonstration of what was learned in scientific experiments, for the purposes of entertainmenet. If you look at the actual experiments this was based on you would find they had a larger sample base, with genders not known.
@cypionate250 the video hinted at the Democrat being less willing to stray from The Party, and you say I'm a cultist? Right. Cults bludgeon Trump supporters on the streets, then cry about it when karma bites them. Cultists try to assasinate a President when the media tells them to. Cultists put feelings over facts. Cultists try to force the rest of us to let you cut our children up. Cultists believe Barrack Obama can do nor wrong and that George Floyd wasn't a thug deserving of his overdose death... Cultists are dumb enough to try to start a war this November they'll lose 🙄
@cypionate250 no, he/she is absolutely correct. Funny you would make that comment when all you have to do is tell a democrat "abortion," and they will all fall in line.
There are two questions that I have based on this illustration. They may be answered in the full study, but I'm just going to ask anyway: 1) I believe it is true that women are more likely to be Democrats and men are more likely to be Republican. Does the gender bias of the two groups affect the average brain makeup of these groups i.e. do men on average have a larger amygdala than women on average? 2) The Democrats appear to have a higher response to incongruent policies than the Republicans. Does this mean that Democrats are simply more radicalized into agreeing with what their party says, or does the party have those policies because it is ones that Democrats agree with? A bit of a chicken or the egg question, I know.
I interprotate the higher activity to incongruent policies as them thinking about and disliking it rather than just ignoring it. Which adds up when you think about how the radical left sort of hates the democratic party.
Some of the commenters are commenting about biological sex. Although there is a difference, sexual dimorphism is VERY minute in the human brain. I suggest Forrest Valkis video 'Sex and Sensibility'
Fun fact, GM distributions remain the same and will largely match your biology no matter what you "feel" you are. There are noticeable differences between both 'types' of brain.
Sex hormones do factor in with the changes in physiology to such a degree that many disorders of the central nervous system have different normative ranges according to male versus female.
@@angelahull9064 There are many different clinical practices where the brain can be more or less important. It's extremely important from an ethics standpoint.
There are very significant differences between female and male brains. The genders are very different in their thinking in all sorts of ways, and not simply because culture made them that way.
Extremely low activity, brain full of irrational, childish ideas and rusty, broken, scattered thoughts. Zero charisma and missing chunks in the area responsible for fashion choices.
This was silly, I could have told you the female was a Democrat and the male was a Republican. Why didn't you get two women and two men from each party when men and women's brains are different. Or at the very least you could have intentionally swapped them, that is get a male Democrat and a female Republican. This may or may not have tripped the doctor up.
@NumberSixAtTheVillage men's and women's brains are virtually identical in almost every way from a physical perspective. The only minor differences are that women have more left/right connectivity and men have more front/back connectivity. The average neuronal density of brain regions in both sexes is identical. It's possible that hormones account for the increase in bilateral connectivity, but the data is inconclusive on that
Cripes the bloke has a well formed brow ridge, what percentage of Neanderthal genetic admixture does he have? Is that factor? Why aren't you comparing oranges with oranges? Woman and woman, men with men, instead of oranges with apples.
I don't think this is real. Sometimes people vote democrat, and sometimes republican. Who is in office, and they change parties, because they like or dislike what each president has done.
Maybe in a less rigidly ideological time, there might have been less of a correlation. But today the parties are essentially proxies for IQ and psychological profiles.
This test is wrong because MAN and WOMAN are far different on views number one and reactions, and physically different in most body size including brain .
@@sourgummyworms45 Known fact that the Man has larger or smaller things than woman. Any idiot could tell this is wrong. In order to do a proper test must be same starting place which is 2 men or 2 woman then ending could be the result.
The video proves that YOU ARE WRONG , because you are biased by your narrow minded sexism. The relation between brain size and activity and political affiliation comes from scientific studies made with large samples , where they are eliminating all other factors than political ideas ....
@@ohfknowned239 Again just your blind ignorance . I dpeak about science, about knowledge from scientific studies. You jyst are in a loop of repeating your ignorance of the subject. They are emiminating any other bras before making the conclusion of the studirs , yes it is science an not blund ignorant sexism, that repeat its beliefs in loop without trying to jnderstznd zbout what you speak.
I’m making my guess 30 seconds in. California man is a democrat, North Dakota woman is a conservative. Edit: I was wrong. I put too much weight on their potential upbringing based on where they are from. My gut is to always judge on gender.
Go to ground.news/Gordon to stay fully informed on politics, science, and more with clarity and context. Save 40% on the Ground News unlimited access Vantage plan with my link.
Both opposing sides of the End are in Reality the same
Ground News is one of those RUclips sponsors that is actually good. Never used it but I've only seen good things about it.
I’ve been using Ground News for almost 2 years and haven’t looked back-it’s genuinely an amazing service to get insight into blind spots for both sides of the aisle 👍
Cool video idea, Jack!
Hi
This 100% proves that liberals are more violent. Just like they were in 2020.
no shit the 22 year old woman was the democrat called it within 2 seconds of seeing her
guess I'm a scientist too
I knew she was a dem to
It's called discernment😂
The lack of a bra was also a dead giveaway.
@@millies500 eyes revolve too much - not stable and smiles are pretentious -- forced.
@@karrynunya2913 Amen
Honestly, for a better comparison, you should have controlled for the gender. Either both male or both female. Gender has an effect on the way the brain works.
Regardless of its effects on the brain, statistically basically all women under 30 (~70%) in america are democrats.
Plus, similar ages. A 19 yo would be so much different than 22 yo, anyone who has had to grow up can tell you, that's a very big stage of growing up.
Education does more than gender. If a person relies more on lying (female) then the mind games are more prevalent... the more educated the individual, lesser the chances that they cause unecessary fuss/chaos. That means that they're ready to discuss and hardly respond emotionally... (actual distress not faked). I could say much Much MUCH more about this subject, but this is the internet and you're using Trump's face as avatar. Even as a joke, it's a yikes from me. Take care, gents... I sincerely hope for the whole world that Kamala wins. Yes, this is the vote of the rest of the planet if they dont wanna see the USA fall. Ask 2 questions (after assessing if the person you interview is Neither racist Nor sexist) and you'll get a 80%+ votes for Kamala. Question one: Do you think another country should lead the world than the USA and would you let an armed conflict determine this? (If the answer is yes, the vote is nullified -- I d C enough to explain this point) and 2nd question.. what you're surveying for (duh.. if you're surprised by this, the first question probably confused you and you should vote for Kamala because you're d_ um _b
@@Dawnarow Wow, tell me you're a leftist without telling me you are a leftist. HOW DO YOU THINK KAMALA IS GOOD? I would rather vote for Joe Biden then her God forbid since at least he's not alive. RFK moved to Trump's side even though he was a life long democrat since Kamala is bar none the most dumb politician I've seen. Fox News destroyed Kamala Harris."
@@Dawnarow Do you actually think the USA would fall if Trump were to win? What are you on about? Is that some elaborate bait?
The main problem is that it was a liberal white woman and conservative asian man. All three of those things (Liberal, White, and woman) play a role in the brain so it'd be more insightful if it were A liberal white woman and a conservative white woman or a Conservative black man and a Liberal black man
Would also be more entertaining having a third participant that was neither party.
That would mess with liberals to do such a study. They believe race is only about skin color and that gender is whatever you want it to be.
@@ramdom_assortmentYeah, I want to see a Green brain. It would be HUGE.
there are no conservative women
@@strawpiglet very little brain activity in green voters brains, they shoot themselves and the environment in the foot constantly
i saw the asian and immediately assumed he was republican, but him being from LA threw me for a loop
It threw me off aswell😂
It kinda makes sense though in a way. I saw the places they were coming from and realized they saw problems with their areas so they became vocal and probably volunteered to be a part of political studies.
yeah he looked composed and professional that's a sign of a republican
He’s 19 though
@TheU.S. There isn’t age limits for political parties
A liberal white woman and a conservative asian man..
BIG shock there 😂😂😂
I live in the SF Bay Area. Most of the BLM posters I see are in the windows and yards of well-off White leftists. None of my Black or Asian friends support BLM.
Lol you didn't even watch the video. The female is Republican and the male is democrat. Your statement is false.
You do understand that the scientist making the prediction did not learn the gender or ethnicity of either participant until after he had made his prediction, right?
@@Slw1111 Duh...
@@Slw1111 r/woosh
Did everyone else correctly guess the party affiliation within 3 minutes of the video without the need for the brain Scan?
19 seconds in, but yes
nah I just looked at their faces and instantly knew, God given discernment actually 👆☝☝
Is this what science has resorted to and medical science at that? First it was her and then came the switch.
I immediately thought that being from LA would be used to throw a twist because law of averages, Californians are Democrat. But then I thought that they might also have planned for that. So I just followed along and I waited to hear what they had to say about ze brain scans.
You know that the scientist isn't supposed to actually see them until the end, right?
He's supposed to be judging solely from the brain scans.
I can already tell who’s democrat and republican
Republican🍆 Democrat 🌮
Anyone can skip to the end and figure it out.
That's funny af because I didn't even think about it
@@_shadow_1I love to see your Boston Terrier profile picture!
Thats a racist comment tbh
obviously my political party member's brain is bestest
Bestest?
@@user-st8vyes7xbestes
@@user-st8vyes7xbestest.
for real
Democrat: smart
Republican: dum...b
Hope this helps ps am from Europe i cant vote👍👌 dont come at me
So the Democrat is brainwashed by the Party line while the Republican is stressed by the Democrat Party line. Sounds about right.
100% correct.
The Republicans know the truth and are stressed.
And yes the Democrats are brainwashed 😂
No the larger amygdala means the Republican thinks with the primitive brain and out of fear.
@@virginiashirley4139 Yes also known as cognitive dissonance.
My first instinct was "white woman = democrat", "asian man = republican" but then they said she was from North Dakota and he was from L.A., so that made me question my initial thoughts.
my thought process was her hair style as the democratic giveaway
@@loganrh it wasn't green or purple so that threw me off. 😅
@@loganrhher style in general gave it away
For me, her voice was a dead giveaway. Idk. It’s that safe feeling I get.
@@musicdiary5768 safe? You think conservatives are dangerous?
Should have done same sex participants, and used 4 subjects instead. There are physical variables that aren’t being accounted for.
I agree. I would be curious to see this in a larger study with more participants, races, ages etc.
@@danielmenetrey6876 that's the point of the video, they guy knew what to look for BECAUSE of all the many previous scientific studies done on this subject.
Sex is just a construct.
Don't be a bigot.
It is actually imposible to know how smart is a group of people, you should study all of em and create a statistical analysis for make a conclusion, this video doesn't runs with the scientific method, therefore it's completely irrelevant.
@@LiberPater777 are you joking or
I didn’t need to see any scientific tests to tell who would be on the left and who would be on the right. I just needed to see their eyes.
The eyes are the window to the soul... how many souls did you see? I'm joking, they both have a soul, just one of them disregards it to vote for greedy reasons.😂
@@bennettd1275 Greedy??? That makes zero sense. How about one to focus on Americans or another one that will focus on foreigners? How about one making American citizens more money and the other making the government larger? What about one being a good leader for the people and the other another term as a Puppet President for some unelected miscreant? That makes the most sense to the most people. 🇺🇸
face for me
Lifeless eyes, black eyes, like a doll's eyes...
All they had to do was put trump on the screen and whoever breaks the restraints and screams is the dem lol
I kinda feel that way too. I have really strong reactions to his fuckin face! I dont have much of any reaction to Kamala or Joe though.
Same with George Soros or any black man on the other side.
🔥
Show the average Trump supporter a photo of Harris and they’ll have a temper tantrum and storm the Capitol.
@@ilikeme1234”this is the gayborhood”
Dude found the only Republican still alive in *Los Angeles.
Edit: [Corrected “Las” to “Los” above]. And I didn’t expect my comment to blow up like this. I’ve written plenty of comments I think were clever but this wasn’t one of them. So either my understanding of what’s Clever isn’t very mainstream, or RUclips has been doing a lot of shadowbanning/removal that I’m not aware of.
its pretty easy in LA: white dude, lady with thick rim glasses, older person with small ponytail = democrat (blue no matter who)
Non-white: everything else - reps, green, independents/centrists, etc
I dont make the rules
Los Angeles**
@@aj-gd2bq~ Thank you.
@@LauraDiamondWise He still hasn't fixed it..
They're just shy voters.
WAIT DEMOCRATS HAVE BRAINS?
😂
HEYOOOOO
Nope, they have "feelings"
Yes, do you want one, too?
@@jasonmartindale3171 Research shows that right wingers tend to make decisions based more on emotions than on logic, but don't let verifiable scientific facts get in the way of your feelings on the subject, eh?
now there is a new meaning to "political scientist"
It used to be correctly called a "Studies". It got pushed in the US during the 1960s to a "Science" to get a higher priority exemption from the draft boards during the Vietnam War.
They've been gaming the system ever since - including packing the government schools and bureaucracy with their Sciency certification. Basically, the Democratic Party IS the Government Party.
It used to be correctly called a "Studies". It got pushed in the US during the 1960s to a "Science" to get a higher priority exemption from the draft boards during the VietnamWar.
They've been gaming the system ever since - including packing the government schools and other bureaucracied with their Sciency certification. Basically, the DemocraticParty IS the GovernmentParty.
Pun trophy 🏆 for you!!!! 😂
@@J.o.e_K Science politicization is not the same as political science, pun or otherwise. Political science is simply the study of politics itself. It has absolutely nothing to do with the covid nonsense, regardless of which side you consider to be nonsense.
(Though I'm sure there's a lot of political scientists writing theses _now_ - after the fact - attempting to explain why a virus got so politicized and how it impacted the world both now and in the future.)
You scanned 2 brains. You should scan 100 each and see the results.
This is just one little fun experiment, that confirms many real scientific studies that have been previously done.
And each one should be slightly different on the political spectrum.
@@kathrynbeetham5308 I agree but I doubt there is a large pot of money and it would require a lot of time. Besides, I think the man trying to make the guess was already a contributor in a study that did just that.
@@barrywilliams991 eh? I'm saying there has already been many scientific studies confirming the results.
He did say that at the beginning
Surprised he could find a brain in the democrat!
💀💀💀 that was hard 😂
😄🤣😂
surprised there are brains in people who are crazy about politics
@@Haillightmodeyou might not care about politics but politics care about you. They dictate your life in one way or another so you should rethink that statement
I can tell just by looking at them but I am going to wait for the conclusion
That’s what they call a stereotype. It’s the same kind of bias that fuels racism & xenophobia ;)
usss
@@Nicogs yea but it was right
@@b1ued it isn't always though, and can hurt people where it isn't
@@Nicogsstereotypes are based in truth brother. Secondly, noticing patterns and drawing conclusions from them are normal, some conclusions are unfounded but don't turn this into some evil thing.
One of them is a male and the other is female wouldn't this result in a problem in the fact that females and males are different, for a control you should have gotten another female and another male to see the effects on their brains.
yeah, this is a terrible "experiment".
Yep, idealy you either have a much larger sample size, or you get two identical twins who have lived their lives together, but somehow have different political party affiliation.
@@TGAcobalt Obviously this was considered. But at the end of the day all literature points to the same signs - republicans just have more emotional tendencies, whereas democrats have more logical ones. It’s not a “who’s better” question, but just how both cultures work in early development.
Well atleast they proved women are different than men.
why are you assuming their gender
Vote Trump while you still can ! Get the lunatics out of the White House !!
Nope!
Already voted!!
No way could I vote for a clown for the sole reason being she owns a vagina.
The Mad Cackler, who is a chronic, unrepentant liar, needs to go away.
But not back here to CA. She has ruined this state enough already.
That would put lunatics in the White House and it would destroy the country you hate.
Nah.
Your the loon bright stuff, your comment is irrelevant here
ok so basically democrats are emotional and republicans logical.
Yep, something that was proven a long time ago
then what are independents
@@iamz_mbie balanced
I'd argue that's a little reductive. If you look at professions for instance, the legal profession (which fundamentally orients on the use of logic for a career) skews moderately Democrat/center-left, as do IT and most research-based scientific professions.
@@iamz_mbie independants will save our country if given the chance. time to stop letting extremists on both sides control.
This isnt the best way to study this imo. You have multiple other differences besides political affiliation affecting their brains, with gender and ethnicity being a couple. The best way to study this would be to try to negate every other variable besides political affiliation.
Another issue is this is a female brain and a male brain.. should've done two females or two males our brains are somewhat different per genders
He has done the research before this video. This is just a demonstration of what the has discovered.
Other variables like gender and ethnicity also correlate with political affiliation. Your guesses are going to be more accurate if you account for these variables as well, but you probably wouldn't need a brain scan to get most of those results.
@@Femsell Good point. Female and Male brains & hormones are a lot different. One being more emotional and one being less so.
@@Femsell thats what he meant by gender, not the other 1200 of pseudogenders
One has a compassion and one takes the life of an innocent baby. One lives a decent honest life and the other live for pride, greed, lust, envy, gluttony, wrath, and sloth.
this one demonizes and dehumanizes the other side while praising their own side. No wonder they call you ...
@@reysolo3672 How is telling the Truth about degeneracy "demonizing" or "dehumanizing" LOL. You give yourself away. Just don't be a degenerate, and people won't think you are one. It's very simple.
@@reysolo3672 No wonder they call one side Right.*
@@reysolo3672 I'm ok with it. Kindness and generosity was taken with what our eyes were forced to see. Heart are cold and eye turned red.
@@americaamerica8579 You're literally an insane, brainwashed person. It's really fucking sad. I know you're a good person, so are we. You're choosing to fight over nothing
The girl being from ND and the guy being from LA threw me off, but as soon as I noticed that he was wearing a Carhartt hoodie, I immediately knew he was Republican. The girl’s attire also aligns with more liberal fashion than republican fashion.
I just assume anyone living in ND that dresses like that is a California transplant. So she was probably from San Francisco to begin with. I can also assume her parents are school teachers.
Asian males are very conservative. It's just an objective statistical reality.
I guessed from her glasses. Liberal women wear glasses more of the time than conservative women. We even call them liberal glasses.
Great, but kind of irrelevant to the video (at least if it was produced honestly). _You_ as a viewer got to see their pictures up front, but fashion choice and home town have zero effect on what a brain scan looks like, and gender only a slight effect (and there's plenty of both Democrat men and Republican women, so even if the scientist was paying attention to gender-based differences in the scans, he would have had no way of knowing whether or not the participants were chosen to be opposite of the "expected" stereotypes... or for that matter if they'd chosen trans participants just to really throw off such gender-based guessing games).
@@altrag: "but fashion choice and...have zero effect on what a brain scan looks like"
Fashion is one mechanism by which people demonstrate identity to each other. I can't imagine how somebody, provided they are not dressing to deceive, could not signal at least a bit how their brain scan would turn out.
I didn't need any of that tech. I just saw a man and a women and assumed the women was democrat.
FEAR MY MASSIVE BRAIN MORTALS!
My mom voted for Trump. When I jokingly asked if she was going to vote for Kamala since Kamala was a woman, her response was, "I'm not voting for that moron." 🤣😂
@@brianschuetz2614 The science indicates that, since your mom is conservative, she has a bigger amygdala and is thus less rational and more emotional.
@brianschuetz2614 Moms tend to vote for people who have the best outcomes for producing safe societies for raising their kids.
Where as women in the prowl put men into positions of adversity if possible.
Like open borders.
@@socko2085 I don't see the connection.
@@brianschuetz2614 i first read, she believes kamala is a moron, that's why she chooses trump. but then i read your message again, and my brain to make sense of it then told me, she must mean, she is not voting for THAT moron. since she would be choosing the moron she prefers, it makes a bit more sense. even if kamala is not actually a moron, that sounds like projection (and perhaps your mom underestimating her own intelligence, and just deciding first and baring the consequences later, you know: judge first, question later)
I guessed the girl being the dem despite being from North Dakota, and the guy being the Republican despite being from LA.
The best information to guess a person’s political party (without brain scans and scientists) would be their age and sex. Young females are more likely to be liberal and men in general are more conservative, even younger men.
Younger men these days are shifting more right than they were 10-20 years ago.
@ Exactly, and young woman are shifting left more than ever.
it's said that Trump's target demographic is 18-30 y/o men.
This is just lazy science. Where is the control?
this isn't science. its a demonstration of a scientific hypothesis.
this is entertainment masking as science, and dumb
@@jsvalina3503 I found another emotional Democrat lol.
This is a correlation study. It's no different than "bigger muscles lift heavier things". In most cases bigger muscles do lift bigger things so we can draw conclusions from the hypothesis with a formidable degree of accuracy. You are too emotional.
@@jsvalina3503 This is science. It uses data to form a conclusion and repeating the study fortifies the hypothesis. Let me guess, you don't think the outliers resemble the anecdotes of the radical left.🤣🤣
I would have liked to see two people with more life experience, 19 and 22 years old is too young. What neuroscientists' claim is, the prefrontal cortex isn't fully mature until approximately age 25.
I know, I know. They are talking about different brain structures in this experiment.
@@zombieapocalypse3837 what the F do you think the pre-frontal cortex is? I'll give you a hint... It's a part of the structure of your brain.
i hate the 25 year BS, that comes from a study (by jay n giedd) where they didn't recruit anyone beyond 25 to scan their brains
it just keeps getting used to justify ageism towards younger people
but i agree that older people would've been nice
Asian guy and the woman threw me off but I realized that I am a republican from Connecticut
Shouldn't. Asians tend to lean more conservative (surprising to non-Asians, I know) UNLESS they are either Lettered Community or those otherwise desperate to disassociate with community because reasons (talking to a rather smallish sampling size of around 70-80 people over the course of a couple of decades, usual cases were they were subjected to some level of isolation from their community,or their community had been painted in a negative light due to Mainstream stereotypes promoted until more recently (Evil Kung Fu guy, Long Duk Dong from "Sixteen Candles," Mama-san war bride, Dragon Lady, etc., etc., etc.) or their perceived fear of the community's reaction to their chosen lifestyle).
What used to surprise me about my visits to California starting as a child spending vacations with relatives is just how religious and conservative a lot of Asians were (usually some denomination of Christianity, followed by Buddhism). Of course, until the demographic grew until it became a significant factor in elections, it was largely ignored, so people tend to assume minority = lefty.
Ha. Me too.
@@NotBCT I’m African American
I could tell right at the beginning when the participants were talking which one was which party, and I'm autistic. That said, the existence of scientifically measurable correlations between biology and politics is really interesting and the implications are worth exploring.
You said a lot without saying much of anything.
No need to scan, it's VERY clear who's who at a quick glance lmao
You can tell by looking at someone?
@@PastaMakerCordy-qy4uz, I'll let Chewbert answer for himself (it will be interesting to see if he saw anything I missed), but it was pretty clear to at least some of us.
The man wasn't as obvious, but his Carhartt sweatshirt, and sitting back exposing his body more suggested confidence in a setting in which he was being evaluated.
The woman was a height-weight proportionate white woman, and chose to wear a thin top, with no brassiere, which exposed her skin at the shoulders and middle combined with yoga pants. The bangs and particular glasses frames weren't as significant but they were also not stereotypically what a conservative woman would wear.
conservative men and women are beautiful
@@PastaMakerCordy-qy4uz Yes, playing the odds, you can tell, in this case...
Young males are more likely to be conservative. Young females are *considerably* more likely to be... uh... "liberal".
If you *only* look at them one at a time, it's about a 55-60% chance the young man is (R)... and about a 70-80% chance that the young woman is (D).
When you add one more piece of knowledge, the "given" that we have exactly one of each... that there's no chance of 2 (R)'s or 2 (D)'s... then the odds shift to something more like 90% that the (D) is the young woman.
I could tell instantly, because the woman had the crazy eyes look, and the fake pretentious smile. While the dude was more relaxed, chill, and normal.
I didn't know democrats had brains.
Democrats are more educated than republicans generally
@@Nina-kp6fv why are they blind hypocrisy?
But i know the result since the beginning haha it was obvious. I mean her face scream democrat
The bangs and glasses combo with a face that is found on girls w hairy armpits?
@@houdinis_teabros got w fetish or something, too descriptive
@@shivanandvp🤦♀️
It's obvious the Republican had a larger amygdala, considering conservative ideology is entirely based on fear and anger
@@houdinis_tea we see the republican response lol
No pun intended but, this was a no brainer. Let's be honest everybody knew who the democrat and republican was tbh.
Is that why democrats generally argue with their feelings rather than with logical points?
I didnt need a brain scan, I KNEW the girl was the democrat before the video was too deep into itself.
I’m surprised how many of you seem to be completely misunderstanding the point: this ISN’T a “study”, this isn’t supposed to be a perfect comparison… also, how are you completely missing the point that the researchers conducting this are themselves RESEARCHERS?!? As in, they would obviously already be aware of the criticisms that some of you are lodging LOL; you guys are not enlightening anyone here.
All this is is an interesting example. Nothing more. Stop trying to pretend that YOU are the trained researchers here; you aren’t; none of us here are; we are just couch potatoes being entertained. Relax.
EXACTLY. THANK YOU
PREACE GOOD SIR
A smile with a smirk.... an incensere smille.. a plastic type of smile... politically correct glasses to have an image she is more intellectual than she is actually not.... participate 1 was democrat... I was right...
Participant 2 was grounded less emotional and was subjectifely more intelligent when asked....
WOW, I wonder what political ideology you lean Mr discipleofchrist😂
I wouldn't be surprised at all if more sociopaths are left wing. The left is absolutely full of virtue signalling liars who will happily crush their 'opponents' (aka anyone that dares to even slightly disagree with them) in a heartbeat just so they can WIN. Total sociopath wannabe victims.
no shit the woman is the democrat i knew it 10 seconds in
the crazy eyes, and fake pretentious smile gave it away instantly, right?
All the cope (not talking about urs) in the comments is hilarious. None of the left will accept this as truth. They gotta "equity" everything to make it "fair" so dumb.
Don't need to see their brains to know which is which, i can tell already.
It’s also male vs female, which makes a huge difference
Democrats don't know what those are
@@FarmSimDaddy We do. We just separate sex and gender to match the current global scientific consensus; something repubs never heard about; science.
@@Hk17161 Nah, you're just afraid of offending bearded dudes in high heels who want to pretend they are 16 year old girls. "Global scientific consensus" lol stfu.
@@Hk17161 republicans will accept fantasy over reality and claim that they are the party of logic.
Are dem males much different from a female besides anatomy. It’s a joke kinda and the setup was to easy 😂
*They scanned the wrong end of the democrat.* 🤣🤣🤣
What about people of the same Gender?
What about people from the same State ?
People from the same family and genetics..
what about learning the subject before asking like if it was a blank experimentation?
they use this brain scale because it is known for being linked to political affiliation .
gender don’t matter
If they had been the same gender you'd just ask "what about different genders?" But of course such things are be covered in the original research if you're actually interested enough to find out. Two whole participants is never going to give relevant results no matter what, and the video noted at least twice (that I recall) that the "experiment" they were performing was just a demonstration and doesn't imply anything statistically significant.
You did a great job getting a democrat and republican to work together. I'm voting for you!
@BlueDolphinBlues Yours is the best comment I've read! BRAVO Bro...
😂
0:54 it’s gonna blow my mind if the guy from LA is the republican 😂
I was thinking the same thing 😅
I'm an Independent Moderate who doesn't believe in false dichotomies and is drawn to subtle nuance. I wonder how I'd fair?
“Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth” -Marcus Aurelius, Meditations
That would be an interesting question. If a person is strong in both brain components what would they tend to be. And if they are weak or equal in both what would they tend too be.
Sometimes I consider myself a liberal extremist.
The democrats look moderate in comparison.
But I'm patient, and understand that people all over the political spectrum have their stance for a reason.
There's a problem with describing our political standing with a binary, when it's much more multidimensional.
@@kamikeserpentail3778 Just sound like a Leftist.
@@kamikeserpentail3778 which is why having dedicated parties for social issues would benefit the US instead of turning it into a blood curdling social experiment about who's team wins.
@@SideBit why need the parties at all? no matter what you do grouping people will create competition
this video caught me so off guard 😭
You should scan the same sex and same race just to compare apples to apples. Men and women's brains are slightly different, and respond to things differently.
they weren't comparing the two against each other, they were comparing the two based on averages of their own age/gender group.
My aunt is a liberal republican, I wonder how that would compare to a conservative democrat in an mri 🤨
Your Aunt is quite literally an oxy-moron.
Right off the top you'd need to define what you mean by "liberal Republican" and "conservative Democrat".
A larger amygdala almost certainly correlates (note: only correlation) with conservatism as fear of change is one of the main defining values of conservatism. That said, given the current state of things (in the US) and the fear about what a second Trump term would do to the country, liberals are likely growing larger amygdala at the moment as well (and the MRI tech did note that both participants were above average - that might not be coincidence).
The ACC is more interesting. I have a feeling it doesn't correlate to ideology so much as it does to extremism and only correlates to Republicans because they've been trending more and more extreme in the Trump era. I'd be interested to know what they'd see if they could find a large enough sample set of frothing-at-the-mouth leftists (not just "anyone who disagrees with Trump gets called a far-left radical" but true left-leaning extremists). I'm not sure there's a large enough population of such people in the US but perhaps other parts of the world could provide such a set, especially South America where leftism still seems to be flourishing, sometimes well into "too much of a good thing" territory. Of course the research would have to be generalized beyond the US-specific "Democrat" vs "Republican" and accommodate a wider range of political beliefs in order to prove that out (or deny it, if I'm wrong).
I think those overlapping variations have been pretty much sorted out after the great moderate purge of the 2000s, leaving only insane people in the democratic party. The only reason Joe Manchin still exists is because they couldn't hunt him down in those mountains.
Your aunt Is just a liberal
@@altrag It isn't "FEAR of change"... that is someone trying to inject a negative context...
Instead, it is a *reluctance* to change... and that reluctance can be 100% logical.
There's a very old adage... "If it ain't broke, don't 'fix' it."
This comment section is proof that most people don't pay attention and form opinions while disregarding many facts. The doctor SAID this isn't a large enough study and was not evidence in itself. He did say he has seen other larger studies that were more scientific and controlled, and this matched what the larger studies showed. So, although THIS test wasn't necessarily scientific evidence, it matched the average of actual scientific evidence. People on here dismissing this data and ignoring that he said that there have been studies that showed the same thing.
This isn’t data.
@WinstonSmithGPT and you have the reading comprehension of a gnat.
Why not test 2 women and 2 men? Where's the control?
Yeah this test is clickbait.
Don't you think it would have made more sense to use the same sex for both brains?
no because there’s no such thing as a male and female brain
@@iamz_mbie I don't know if you're joking or what.
@@iamz_mbie You're misinformed.
@@iamz_mbie Tell me you don't have any knowledge of brain research without telling me...
The main problem is there just tneeds to be a bigger sample size in general. Like 100 conservative brains vs 100 liberal brains.
This is not science, you would need at least a 1,000 subjects to make any statements at all...what a sad joke.
you missed the part where there was a study
@stephensummers1958 that was not a study it was a sad joke!
@@timothydavidhobbs9628 correct... you didnt get it once again... the study was before all of this...
So you did a non-study with three uncontrolled variables on two participants. Good job.
I knew it based on the way they looked
pretty much.
Same. I couldn't tell for the dude on his own. I automatically knew the girl was democrat.
@@comradelade5524 Same people who call other people cultists all look the same the irony if you got 100 dem voters in a room they would all look the same vs republicans are actually more diverse in the way they look, dress and carry themselves.
One is male and one is female, the parameters are not established.
This wasn't the first test study. Didn't you catch that as often as they referred to it? They've been doing this a while, and this guy and his channel wanted to try it and see for themselves, and the breakdown of how it works.
But we keep hearing gender is irrelevant.
Not gender but sex, there are differences .
Look at how each gender votes on average and it makes sense
How dare you assume their genders!
You could tell who was who from the way they introduced themselves.
What happens when people flip parties? Does this only work for people who never swap?
Parts of the brain can change size with age, as the FMRI guy was saying. Also the area of the brain associated with logic develops with age
That’s a good question!
@fluffsquirrel i hear that but people flip both ways as they age.
@@Maridesk-diaries Could be the "grass is always greener on the other side" effect, as well as trying to avoid feeling like you're part of a hive-mind party. Not sure what part of the brain that would correspond to, sorry.
Pseudoscience
Controls are no good! Should have had the two be same gender and be as close to the same in all aspects and from the same city, just differentarties
gender doesn’t matter since there’s no such thing as a male and female brain
What a surprise the woman was democrat and the dude republican. Who would have guessed this. \s
Does the brain determine the party or does the party determine the brain? What happens when people, like Tulsi Gabbard, switch parties?
i’d bet the party determines the brain
I think it's both. Genetic factors play a signifigant role in how the brain develops, but at the same time the brain is also quite susceptible to non-genetic factors, that can cause different areas of the brain to grow, shrink or even change shape
Tulsi's brain grew.
3:48 the guy has an angry cat in his brain 😂
😂
😂😂😂 I saw that too!!
this is stupid...... Should be a lot more people. Just two says nothing
this is super interesting but a sample size of 2 is not enough
To have enough data to assume amd be right before hand is pretty telling though. This was a yt video, the sample size from his research is thousands though.
Yes, I think it would be a better idea to choose from a larger group both males and females.
Ironically politics will get in the way of finding the truth, about politics.
this is just a test compared to studies made with big samples.
We don't need a larger study. Tons of dems needed safe spaces, cried hysterically, and totally lost their minds when DJT won 2016. That's all you need to know.
Plus there have been actually studies done showing that many dem voters take pills for mental health over Republican voters.
1:55 Recruit this man to voiceover villains. Do it now.
😂😂😂he sounds beta
this is the least scientific science experiment ever lol
I'm a minute in, and my prediction is the white girl with the transparent glasses frame is the democrat.
I came to the correct conclusion as soon as they had both spoken in their introductions.
Republicans are less likely to be triggered Karens... Shocker.
I love how no one in the comments gave spoilers lol
If you are going to do this in the future you need to find two identical twins with opposite political party affiliation, and have a much larger sample size. The brain changes a lot in between those three years, and brains between women and men, are vastly different.
I wonder how often identical twins actually do have opposing political affiliation.
If brain structure is any predictor, then genetics certainly would be an influence.
@@kamikeserpentail3778 its a good question, and my sample size is very small, but i have known identical twins with vastly different political beliefs, generally because one parent was one nd nother parent was the other party.
you miss the point that they have already made studies on a large sample of peoples of two sexes....
Just read the dude's paper. No need to critique the video when the source is right there.
@@moocows111111 Since when was there a rule that you could only critique a first person source? You should site a first person source as often as possible, but only being allowed to critique a first person source is a new rule to me.
Let’s test a Karen 😅. I’m curious. Trump 2024🇺🇸✊🏾
As interesting as this was, the results are skewed and could be called biased because of the uncontrolled aspects, e.g. sex because there differences in the male and female brains in the areas which were looked at.
Especially considering over 60% of the Democratic voterbase is unmarried women.
And the girl looks like a liberal, let's be honest.
there aren’t enough differences between the male and female brain to be able to determine gender from a brain scan
SPOILER ALERT: I would have withheld their geographic information. It was obviously a red herring when taken with everything else presented that gave away the conculsion.
"The science is real"
*Didn't actually use scientific procedure
As much as I feel favored by the "results," I don't care because, they're not valid. It would cost tens of thousands of dollars, to scan enough people, to come up with any sort of validation in the findings.
But, I'm giving one of these 👍, cuz I commend the effort.
Not to be that person, BUT I HAVE NEVER SEEN SOMEONE FROM NORTH DAKOTA.
It's ironic too. North Dakota is a deep red state lol
I wonder...since I am a cousin to the first Republican President if that makes me to be more conservative?
Interesting!
You really aren't related unless you are a 1st cousin
Your family probably has conservative values and traditions if they are close to his family.
This guy went off of his instincts. I knew which was democrat and which was republican before I saw any brains or science.
As a North Dakotan this lady screams a Fargo woman more than a real North Dakotan
I knew right away when they showed where they were from. They were obviously trying to throw people off. And when i heard the asian guy had a bit of an accent it kind of implied he grew up in a traditional asian household which is statistically far more likely to be conservative.
Logic over emotion always.
Now I understand Jim Morrison's line about their brain "squirming like a toad".
Trump 2024!!!
The moment I seen that CarHarrt hoodie, I said "Republican!"
such a thorough comprehensive study.... large sample size and controlled for age, gender, race, IQ... oh wait.
the main difference between libs and conservatives is the ability to forsee consequences.
It has been demonstrated to be genetically determined decades ago.
the fact that you were clear about the genders of the patients destroys the results with data pollution from irrelevant axes, this is a complete waste since it wasn't blind
dunning kruger effect....
This is based studies on more or less large samples of peoples, then here the main difference is the ideological orientation, not the sex.
This isn't a scientific experiment. It is a demonstration of what was learned in scientific experiments, for the purposes of entertainmenet. If you look at the actual experiments this was based on you would find they had a larger sample base, with genders not known.
The doctor who came on as a guest never witnessed the participants until after he analyzed the data.
I'm surprised you actually found brain activity in the Democrat.
😂
Speaks a cult follower 🤪
@cypionate250 the video hinted at the Democrat being less willing to stray from The Party, and you say I'm a cultist?
Right.
Cults bludgeon Trump supporters on the streets, then cry about it when karma bites them.
Cultists try to assasinate a President when the media tells them to.
Cultists put feelings over facts.
Cultists try to force the rest of us to let you cut our children up.
Cultists believe Barrack Obama can do nor wrong and that George Floyd wasn't a thug deserving of his overdose death...
Cultists are dumb enough to try to start a war this November they'll lose 🙄
@cypionate250 no, he/she is absolutely correct. Funny you would make that comment when all you have to do is tell a democrat "abortion," and they will all fall in line.
Says a bigot with nothing but hate
Democrat = thinks along party lines.
Republican = independent thinker.
democrat = brainwashed & disconnected with reality
There are two questions that I have based on this illustration. They may be answered in the full study, but I'm just going to ask anyway:
1) I believe it is true that women are more likely to be Democrats and men are more likely to be Republican. Does the gender bias of the two groups affect the average brain makeup of these groups i.e. do men on average have a larger amygdala than women on average?
2) The Democrats appear to have a higher response to incongruent policies than the Republicans. Does this mean that Democrats are simply more radicalized into agreeing with what their party says, or does the party have those policies because it is ones that Democrats agree with? A bit of a chicken or the egg question, I know.
I interprotate the higher activity to incongruent policies as them thinking about and disliking it rather than just ignoring it. Which adds up when you think about how the radical left sort of hates the democratic party.
Some of the commenters are commenting about biological sex.
Although there is a difference, sexual dimorphism is VERY minute in the human brain.
I suggest Forrest Valkis video 'Sex and Sensibility'
Fun fact, GM distributions remain the same and will largely match your biology no matter what you "feel" you are. There are noticeable differences between both 'types' of brain.
Sex hormones do factor in with the changes in physiology to such a degree that many disorders of the central nervous system have different normative ranges according to male versus female.
@@Axodusnoticeable does not always mean clinically significant
@@angelahull9064 There are many different clinical practices where the brain can be more or less important. It's extremely important from an ethics standpoint.
There are very significant differences between female and male brains. The genders are very different in their thinking in all sorts of ways, and not simply because culture made them that way.
I could tell just by looking at their gender and race.
What would a libertarian's brain look like? They could go right or left of median and have a stronger tendency to think outside of party lines.
Extremely low activity, brain full of irrational, childish ideas and rusty, broken, scattered thoughts. Zero charisma and missing chunks in the area responsible for fashion choices.
This was silly, I could have told you the female was a Democrat and the male was a Republican. Why didn't you get two women and two men from each party when men and women's brains are different. Or at the very least you could have intentionally swapped them, that is get a male Democrat and a female Republican. This may or may not have tripped the doctor up.
@NumberSixAtTheVillage men's and women's brains are virtually identical in almost every way from a physical perspective. The only minor differences are that women have more left/right connectivity and men have more front/back connectivity. The average neuronal density of brain regions in both sexes is identical. It's possible that hormones account for the increase in bilateral connectivity, but the data is inconclusive on that
stupid comment by ignorant who does not understand the subject of the video, and the matter of the study.
@@jean-louispech4921 - any study that only entails two people is not a study.
@@NumberSixAtTheVillage
This is not a study, this is a test from datas of real studies.
This is what all the ignorants can't get.
Cripes the bloke has a well formed brow ridge, what percentage of Neanderthal genetic admixture does he have? Is that factor? Why aren't you comparing oranges with oranges? Woman and woman, men with men, instead of oranges with apples.
What they wore gave it away before the brain scans.
wow Jack this is so cool!!!!!!
Ultra meat rider
@@RickAstley14125 real
Ultra meat rider
meat rider pro max ultra
@@SuzieTaylor Meat Rider Pro Max
I don't think this is real. Sometimes people vote democrat, and sometimes republican. Who is in office, and they change parties, because they like or dislike what each president has done.
Maybe in a less rigidly ideological time, there might have been less of a correlation. But today the parties are essentially proxies for IQ and psychological profiles.
This test is wrong because MAN and WOMAN are far different on views number one and reactions, and physically different in most body size including brain .
Wrong huh? Okay Dr. show me your test results that disprove this.
@@sourgummyworms45 Known fact that the Man has larger or smaller things than woman. Any idiot could tell this is wrong. In order to do a proper test must be same starting place which is 2 men or 2 woman then ending could be the result.
The video proves that YOU ARE WRONG , because you are biased by your narrow minded sexism.
The relation between brain size and activity and political affiliation comes from scientific studies made with large samples , where they are eliminating all other factors than political ideas ....
@@jean-louispech4921 WOW Science is science. Look up if woman has some smaller brain parts than men and vice versa you would be amazed at what I say.
@@ohfknowned239
Again just your blind ignorance .
I dpeak about science, about knowledge from scientific studies.
You jyst are in a loop of repeating your ignorance of the subject.
They are emiminating any other bras before making the conclusion of the studirs , yes it is science an not blund ignorant sexism, that repeat its beliefs in loop without trying to jnderstznd zbout what you speak.
I’m making my guess 30 seconds in. California man is a democrat, North Dakota woman is a conservative.
Edit: I was wrong. I put too much weight on their potential upbringing based on where they are from. My gut is to always judge on gender.
These days, gender is a WAY better indicator of party.
I scanned the brain of a youtube clickbaiter...