Brilliant video! Definitely a big help for my upcoming exams. Easier to learn with someone talking than just reading off paper. Both together work well, thank you!
Thank you! Will let you know if this comes up but my Lecturer has definitely been hinting towards it. I shouldn't talk about my lecturer, could be defamation ;)
I have a Tort exam on the 13th & I'm not as prepared as I should be! Thankful for your videos as they really get to the point and you explain things really clearly! Fingers cross the exam goes well! :/
Telling everyone that a woman had kids with someone other than who she was married to, to slander. If you've done a background check and found criminal records, found evidence of venereal disease, and has witnessed them being unable to perform their job, you can't sue for slander. A con artist doesn't care about their reputation. These have become pathetic. If everyone you worked with states 'unable to perform job', that is a fact If there is a health concern and you have to disclose an STD and someone, that is a matter of public health. The first statement is something with no basis in fact, that was ONLY posted to cause harm.
+cory Harrison Unless it's a recording in a public place where the subject knew he was being recorded, it may not be admissible in Court. Take for example certain call centres, which expressly stipulates that the conversation is being recorded.
+cory Harrison depends on state.son was recorded in his own home without knowledge and was being bullied by stupid uncle,the judge listened to it and I surprised even though the one who snuck recording hurt theirself.good luck.you know more than a dumb lawyer.you was there,they were not.
Just a small correction to your excellent video. "Libel" is pronounced as Lie-ble as in telling a lie and bible. It is definitely not pronounced as Lee-Bell
+Soviet Ninja Interesting point. However, even in the US I believe the first amendment is subject to a few qualifications. In the UK, in the absence of a written constitution, it's up to Common Law and now statute to a certain degree to uphold freedom of speech :)
+Joseph VanCamp If you don't find it interesting you definitely should not be studying the subject. I think these videos are great, even just these small 'taster' sessions
![Eminem - Fuel (feat. JID) [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/t5H_CewqpKA/mqdefault.jpg)
I thank God every day for bringing me to your channel thanks
The guilty mind indeed runs rampant no?
I will check fine print.
I really dislike cowardly behaviour
Brilliant video! Definitely a big help for my upcoming exams. Easier to learn with someone talking than just reading off paper. Both together work well, thank you!
+dantuck41 I'm glad these videos were helpful. All the best for your exams!
Thank you! Will let you know if this comes up but my Lecturer has definitely been hinting towards it.
I shouldn't talk about my lecturer, could be defamation ;)
I have a Tort exam on the 13th & I'm not as prepared as I should be! Thankful for your videos as they really get to the point and you explain things really clearly! Fingers cross the exam goes well! :/
Hi Luwam. I’m glad these lessons have been helpful. All the best for your upcoming exam!
How’d you do? I have one Monday.
In Uganda at law development center...I find the video relevant and good in all cases.
I really appreciate
Very well explained. Thank you. The videos are very helpful.
Great video so far, just noticed a mistake with the Huth v Huth case- courts in fact held a defamatory statement couldn't be found
Thanks ! Awesome video
Defamation does not stand when the perpetrator has a history of said crimes and past felony points to criminal behaviour.
England version - I didn't catch that until it got deep in the case. But good job.
It's very good!Thank you!!
what if defamation was part of a scandal, tampering with a witness, defrauding someone...delaying tactics.
It would depend on a number of surrounding circumstances. For instance, Defamation would then become a part of compounded set of claims.
Telling everyone that a woman had kids with someone other than who she was married to, to slander.
If you've done a background check and found criminal records, found evidence of venereal disease, and has witnessed them being unable to perform their job, you can't sue for slander.
A con artist doesn't care about their reputation. These have become pathetic.
If everyone you worked with states 'unable to perform job', that is a fact
If there is a health concern and you have to disclose an STD and someone, that is a matter of public health.
The first statement is something with no basis in fact, that was ONLY posted to cause harm.
what would be the reference if i were about to write this information in my research paper
JUSTICE ⚖ FOR MONICA GANDY IN JESUS NAME 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
thanx well explained rob.
Thank you so much!
well explained. Sir, can you please help me understand delict.
Hi Bongiwe. Thanks for getting in touch. Could you drop an email to discuss setting up a Masterclass for Delict: shaveen@outlook.com
Is your session based on uk tort law
Yes. It’s based on English Law.
if you have a recording of a conversation can that be used to prove slander
+cory Harrison Unless it's a recording in a public place where the subject knew he was being recorded, it may not be admissible in Court. Take for example certain call centres, which expressly stipulates that the conversation is being recorded.
No it was an office. I didn't think so. But thanks again and keep up the good work
+cory Harrison depends on state.son was recorded in his own home without knowledge and was being bullied by stupid uncle,the judge listened to it and I surprised even though the one who snuck recording hurt theirself.good luck.you know more than a dumb lawyer.you was there,they were not.
Just a small correction to your excellent video. "Libel" is pronounced as Lie-ble as in telling a lie and bible. It is definitely not pronounced as Lee-Bell
+salimsg Hi. Many thanks for the correction. That's an interesting reference to how it is pronounced 😊
Defeats the purpose of the first amendment.
+Soviet Ninja Interesting point. However, even in the US I believe the first amendment is subject to a few qualifications. In the UK, in the absence of a written constitution, it's up to Common Law and now statute to a certain degree to uphold freedom of speech :)
plz hindi explan humkk english samj ni aati to plz hindi traslet video
3:10
huth v huth hahahaha....typical desi pronounciation...smashed it, good video though definitley help out
can you try and make your pronunciation a bit clearer? great video though
Hi Amy. Thanks for the feedback.
Hindi me video bnaye plzz sir
Libel (lie-bull)
It’s pronounced Lai-ble not Li-bell mate
these are terrible zzzzz. lessons should be interesting if they are visual
Hi Joseph. Thanks for the feedback. I am planning on improving on the videos and expanding the type of content. Cheers.
+Joseph VanCamp If you don't find it interesting you definitely should not be studying the subject. I think these videos are great, even just these small 'taster' sessions
+Joseph VanCamp I disagree, they are a great re-cap on the subject and straight to the point with case law.
it had all the information but the video itself gets boring after 2 minutes