Does molly stay in the lab with participates because they might think she'll be judging them. Cause in the back of my mind id have the milgram and Stanford prison experiments and this could influence their judgment.
the speakers cheerful summer getup complete with colorful costume jewelry necklace, while speaking of experiments like how much people need to get paid to cut of their own toes off, is not only in terribly bad taste, but calls into question the credibility of the entire body of information. Were the experimenters and scientists she cites also as socially maladept I wonder
I am evaluating the culture and society based on inputs, outputs and the phenomenon that arises in between. i.e. complex strategies and counter strategies that emerge as behavior, with humans trying to get ahead within frameworks that exists - i.e. usually involving other humans (humans famous for manipulating their environment, including others human being within it , needless to say) What use is processing such reams of data when practitioners reveal such incoherence in applying them personally? if this is the case to begin with (i.e. inadvertent behavior) which i doubt. But as always the best defense is a good offence, as you and others like you have stepped forward to defend The absent minded, preoccupied and thus shabbily dressed professor profile makes much more sense, In feeling inclined to temper the orderly demands of science with some degree of disarray in presentation style maybe. Taking things away to limit impedance and resistance? As means of managing group perception and sentiment, to get ahead personally or forward cause. So that such a phenomenon (even when not so calculative, but rather instinctive) is easily and naturally understood, as being a question of priorities and allocation of resources. This on the other hand, may be an example of "subconsciously trying to derail agendas? If not stall proceedings Taking away an element, rather than adding in superfluous redundancies meant to bog down, distract and dilute Creating distractions and encouraging cognitive dissonance via uninformed (or deliberately) misaligned dress sense and social cues
Oh. They didn't record the Q&A that's too bad.
Great talks… sad that the charts are not visible.
Does molly stay in the lab with participates because they might think she'll be judging them. Cause in the back of my mind id have the milgram and Stanford prison experiments and this could influence their judgment.
Very insightful, thank you!!!
I like the qualitative approach of the blue-haired guy more than the quantitative(boring) approach of the lady with the beautiful necklace.
Totally what an ace observation.
There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face
came here after strangers with candy search, this lecture should be on point. let the empathy begin with thick European accents!
bugger just another American at oxford
Sounds like an argument for utilitarianism
the speakers cheerful summer getup complete with colorful costume jewelry necklace, while speaking of experiments like how much people need to get paid to cut of their own toes off, is not only in terribly bad taste, but calls into question the credibility of the entire body of information. Were the experimenters and scientists she cites also as socially maladept I wonder
You can't be serious.
call me crazy but I don't think toe-cutting anecdotes, and costume jewelry go together. Wouldn't it jingle all the way ?
You're judging the lecture based on attire? Get some fucking help.
I am evaluating the culture and society based on inputs, outputs and the phenomenon that arises in between.
i.e. complex strategies and counter strategies that emerge as behavior, with humans trying to get ahead within frameworks that exists - i.e. usually involving other humans
(humans famous for manipulating their environment, including others human being within it , needless to say)
What use is processing such reams of data when practitioners reveal such incoherence in applying them personally? if this is the case to begin with (i.e. inadvertent behavior) which i doubt.
But as always the best defense is a good offence, as you and others like you have stepped forward to defend
The absent minded, preoccupied and thus shabbily dressed professor profile makes much more sense,
In feeling inclined to temper the orderly demands of science with some degree of disarray in presentation style maybe.
Taking things away to limit impedance and resistance?
As means of managing group perception and sentiment, to get ahead personally or forward cause.
So that such a phenomenon (even when not so calculative, but rather instinctive) is easily and naturally understood,
as being a question of priorities and allocation of resources.
This on the other hand, may be an example of "subconsciously trying to derail agendas? If not stall proceedings
Taking away an element, rather than adding in superfluous redundancies meant to bog down, distract and dilute
Creating distractions and encouraging cognitive dissonance via uninformed (or deliberately) misaligned dress sense and social cues
weewilly2007
Like I said, get some help.