PERA are strongly being accused of hacking online btw, so it could be hilarious to see them here. My bold prediction is C9 don't make it, no peekers adv and no AWP
I'm not sure if it's the shorter games or what, but I can't help but feel that CS2 has limited the value of the middle range players. This isn't off number but just feelings as I've studied fantasy this year. It felt like in CSGO the best strategy for consistency was picking under priced players in the middle of the pack. I'd often have teams of all silvers. Now it seems like there are a lot more teams performing with the superstar and bottom feeders strategy. I'm not sure why this is the case, maybe it's just recency bias, but that's what I've notice.
I had high hopes for Monte but playing withouth sdy (at least for the first 2 matches) makes me favor C9 in their 1-0 matchup, so maybe the AWPless c9 squad can go up 2-0 in day 1?
Don't like ENCE at all for this one. Hard seeds, and I don't believe in the Kato run at all, especially with how they got dumpster by MOUZ and Falcons.
I've come to a conclusion about the RMR fantasy - you shouldn't spend your big money on players who are going to go 3-0, you should aim to spend a lot of a player that's gonna farm every game but is still going to go 3-2 or 2-3 to maximise points, and spend cheap on the teams that will go 3-0, because it's only 3 points for padding and dumping a load of money on someone who's only gonna farm 3 matches, then get 3 points for padding seems like a waste
Its not 3 points of padding, it gives you points relative to the individuals performance +6 team points +average role points. If someone goes 3-0 and ends on say a 1.30 rating, they will get points equivalent to them going 5-0 (an extra 2 bo3s but with no booster points obviously). It's only the eliminated teams that lose a fixed number of points (-3) the winners gain points exponentially
i went with a full send last time with niko AND monesy along with triple IGL snappi major and aleksi and got top 11% lol. SO glad my bet on Niko finally payed off. It almost never does
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
14:37 is gold
8:25 rant about donk is exactly what im going through, looking forward to regretting it again
I'm not buying what they're selling!
PERA are strongly being accused of hacking online btw, so it could be hilarious to see them here. My bold prediction is C9 don't make it, no peekers adv and no AWP
C9 play PERA first and then quite likely monte (with no SDY) so I'm gambling on them going through
F went 3-0
@@quincylinder9738 yup, big L. My entire fantasy is a L lol.
major feels odds without you man
you have a robot worm on your head
I'm not sure if it's the shorter games or what, but I can't help but feel that CS2 has limited the value of the middle range players. This isn't off number but just feelings as I've studied fantasy this year. It felt like in CSGO the best strategy for consistency was picking under priced players in the middle of the pack. I'd often have teams of all silvers. Now it seems like there are a lot more teams performing with the superstar and bottom feeders strategy. I'm not sure why this is the case, maybe it's just recency bias, but that's what I've notice.
Yo that Ence beanie is dope as hell 🔥
I had high hopes for Monte but playing withouth sdy (at least for the first 2 matches) makes me favor C9 in their 1-0 matchup, so maybe the AWPless c9 squad can go up 2-0 in day 1?
Not Hades with the 0.25 v Spirit!
are you aware of monte playing without sdy?
Got my first 1% with Jame, Mir, NickelBack, Hunter and Niko :D
Monte stocks a bit down now given SDY is not playing, so C9 will probably take them now.
Don't like ENCE at all for this one. Hard seeds, and I don't believe in the Kato run at all, especially with how they got dumpster by MOUZ and Falcons.
I've come to a conclusion about the RMR fantasy - you shouldn't spend your big money on players who are going to go 3-0, you should aim to spend a lot of a player that's gonna farm every game but is still going to go 3-2 or 2-3 to maximise points, and spend cheap on the teams that will go 3-0, because it's only 3 points for padding and dumping a load of money on someone who's only gonna farm 3 matches, then get 3 points for padding seems like a waste
G2 and VP went 3-0 and thats what all the top pickers picked for RMR A so....
Its not 3 points of padding, it gives you points relative to the individuals performance +6 team points +average role points. If someone goes 3-0 and ends on say a 1.30 rating, they will get points equivalent to them going 5-0 (an extra 2 bo3s but with no booster points obviously). It's only the eliminated teams that lose a fixed number of points (-3) the winners gain points exponentially
i went with a full send last time with niko AND monesy along with triple IGL snappi major and aleksi and got top 11% lol. SO glad my bet on Niko finally payed off. It almost never does