When I was a kid in Uzbekistan, I watched your documentaries dubbed in Uzbek because I didn’t know English. Now, years later, I’m watching you in English, understanding every word and it feels limitless. Thank you, Dr. Tyson, for being a voice that opened my mind to the cosmos long before I understood the language. You have inspired a lifelong journey of curiosity. With all my heart - thank you.
This is awesome thank you for sharing! I'm a native English speaker and your comment here really made me think of how much I take my native language for granted.
I have been to Uzbekistan, it is a beautiful country and wonderful people! Growing up in the US in the 70s and 80s, we had never heard of Uzbekistan, just USSR. I have been twice to Tashkent on business, but made friends I know I will still have decades from now. I can even make plov! I am oshpaz! 😊
That begs the question: If we are in a black hole and we have observed black holes within our frame of reference. How dense can matter get? It's like the square of a square. If we're in a black hole and we have local black holes, do those black holes also contain black holes? Where does that end and what does that entail when we extrapolate out the end of our universe?
Also in the reverse, what if our black hole is in another exterior universe. Then what if our black hole got absorbed by another exterior black hole 😵💫
2:23 - From this explanation, it would seem we have already expanded from the other side of a BH, meaning the BB was when we were at the highest compression point before exiting! Therefore, BHs are now able to form again in 'normal' space?
Of course they do contain other black holes, i think if you leave your local blackhole you jump upwards a dimension. Some said there are 16 d-s, so...were never going to know, but most likely thats whats up
Have you tried understanding a theory or hypothesis without just giving up? It's like reading a difficult book, you gotta read a paragraph a couple times and then eventually it clicks.
he's wrong, and he was sent a Discrete Relativity that was proven that he ignores. We already have answers to these questions, but there is an active contingent of Einstein worshippers that is suppressing it.
lol it should open your mind to happiness because none of it matters in the long run, whether you are in reality or simulation, or black hole, the present moment you are experiencing is the same. So it literally doesn't matter in any sense that is relevant to your life. Except to expand your mind!
I actually found it to be the complete opposite. I feel a combination of peace and awe. It's like everything is a well oiled, perfectly designed machine that destroys and gives birth in an infinite loop. Just like how living beings reproduce, i think the big bang was just a white hole at the other end of a black hole giving birth to a new universe... and that black holes in our current universe will in turn give birth to their own respective universes. Its like a cosmic breeding ground on an incomprehensibly massive scale... and that is cool AF.
I wouldn't trust this dude reading my vacuum cleaner assembly instructions. If there could ever be a bigger shill than this blowhard I'd pay money to meet them.
So if we’re in a black hole, does that mean there was no Big Bang? So instead of a big bang, there was just a point where our universe had enough critical mass to start?
@@Kurtiskurtical What if it was a big bang but inside the confines of a black hole when all light was first drawn in at the very start? Like a black hole forming when a massive star dies? So our galaxy was formed from the condensed remnants of a massive star dying.
So for 100 years scientists were scratching their heads trying to figure out what happens inside black holes, where our understanding of physics fails, only to find out we have been in the black hole the whole time? Poetic
It makes sense, which in no way is enough proof to say for certain, but it's still fascinating. Physicists hypothesized that to travel to another universe, you would need to create a hole in spacetime. How do you do that? With extreme pressure focused on a single point; like a blackhole with monumental gravitational pressure bearing down on a singularity. The singularity being defined as "a theoretical condition in which gravity is predicted to be so intense that spacetime itself would break down catastrophically" really makes you wonder if spacetime breaking down at the singularity of a blackhole creates the conditions necessary to leave our universe for another!
@@RagTheWorldthe human population would be longggggg gone before the probe reached the edge of the universe, we would die out before it even got close not to mention the universe is constantly expanding
@@RagTheWorld Well... the black hole universe model says that nothing can come in from outside of it because all matter that could enter was already part of the original collapse-there’s no ongoing inflow. On top of that, the universe is unbounded, so there's no physical edge to send a probe to. It would be like flying a drone across the surface of the earth expecting to find an end.
I mean, it (the premise of our entire history and existence having occurred inside a black hole) could spawn easily dozens of Sci-Fi works. It’s so interesting that a falsified tenet of the black hole, the abyssal vacuum devoid absolutely of time and phenomena, mainly created such an entity in our imaginations. We stopped at the precipice, not allowing for a fundamental connection to survive; or so the case may be.
One of the things I find most interesting about growing older is witnessing the development of knowledge. We now know or understand much more then when I was a child and this alone motivates me to stay curious about all and everything that life brings, both good and bad.
@@CravenM1980 Let me guess: you believe some kind of Marvel Superhero called god created the universe, right? Instead of accepting scientific findings you believe a fairy tale. Got ya.
@@anadd6195he does tell cool fairy tales, but he is no scientist. This theory has little scientific ground, if you want to go there. But it’s interesting to explore - there’s that.
Incredible theory. The most amazing thing is just that it perfectly makes sense. Because it also explains that our universe doesn’t appeared out of nowhere, but is transformed other universe, and maybe it goes back and forth
As someone who deeply admires you and values critical thinking and scientific reasoning-within my humble capacities-I found this episode both fascinating and humbling. The notion of a cosmic horizon beyond which no information has yet reached us is a powerful reminder that our understanding of the universe is inherently limited. Even with all our telescopes, equations, and expanding models, there are entire regions of reality we simply cannot access-perhaps ever. And yet, science progresses not by pretending to know everything, but by honestly acknowledging what we don’t know. That, to me, is what makes science beautiful: its commitment to evidence, its tolerance for uncertainty, and its refusal to overpromise. Thanks, Neil, for always reminding us how vast, mysterious, and thrillingly unreachable the universe still is
I'm immediately reminded of the episode of Futurama where they find out their universe is contained inside a box residing in a parallel universe version of Planet Express HQ, and that parallel universe simultaneously exists inside a box residing in their own Planet Express HQ.
I'll be honest, I started watching this video dubious about whether or not our universe resides inside a black hole, and ended the video thinking it may be very well plausible. I love your concise explanations, Neil. It's the mark of a good communicator and teacher, and it brings science to everyone.
Yes, our Universe is definitely rotating, but it's not a "black hole"... Everything, from the only 2 existing fundamental particles of opposite charge (the electron & positron) to the whole finite Universe, is pure rotational energy with eternally conserved angular momentum, in an infinite chain of dynamic cycles of expansion and contraction with no beginning and no end. The Standard Model of Particle Physics (a cool math game of illusory statistics & probabilities) with all of its fantastical Quantum Zhait soup, is wrong. Imho, Ernest Sternglass discovered the closest thing we have to a ToE, and XiangHe masterfully interpreted it in the most simple, sound, and logically coherent way I've encountered.
@@v1kt0u5 Cosmologists have looked for signs of large-scale rotation of the universe (a global "spin" or preferred direction) and found no compelling evidence. The cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) is extremely uniform and isotropic, which strongly suggests that the universe is not rotating as a whole. A rotating universe would violate cosmological principles (homogeneity and isotropy) and could have observable consequences, such as anisotropies in the CMB, which we don’t see. Yes, angular momentum is conserved in physics. However, not everything is “pure rotational energy.” Particles and systems have various forms of energy - kinetic, potential, rest mass energy, thermal, electromagnetic, etc. Spin is a property of particles (like electrons), but calling them “pure rotational energy” misrepresents the quantum nature of spin - it's not classical rotation, but a fundamental quantum number. The idea of “eternally conserved angular momentum” at the universal scale is speculative and not part of any accepted physical theory.
to be honest: the horizon of the universe being an event horizon would make it so much easier regarding the question "what is behind the universe horizon? What is in the space where the universe is expanding into?" Well with a black hole it makes so much more sense
Right but it doesn't really satisfy the original question because then you just change it to what's outside the universe of the black hole we're inside, and if it's black holes all the way up, do you really feel satisfied with that answer either?
This would explain how the mass of our universe is expanding, because more mass would be falling into the black hole. What if time is moving faster in the universe outside of our black hole? Then as more mass falls into the black hole it is both in the black hole and we cannot perceive it because it hasn't entered the universe in our timeline. This could explain dark matter.
@@jesusvaldez2832 You're misunderstanding it. There isn't more mass. The universe is expanding with the same amount of mass inside it. Same amount of now then when the big bang happened.
Since we observe black holes inside our own black hole, it seem likely we could be inside an infinite number of black holes. That means there is no mysteries as to what goes on inside a black hole because we are directly observing one from the inside.
Don't worry, there are still mysteries. Some physicists speculate if the fundamental physical parameters like the neutron/proton mass ratio or the number 137 might have different values in different universes or even regions of the universe.
It’ll be preferable if we distinguish between observing a black hole’s mysterious properties, occurrence, and learn about such phenomena considering that we don’t live in one, therefore makes it difficult to understand such phenomena and understanding a black is considered a complication because we are occupying inside a black hole.
There are no black holes, the creation is perfect, why would God create such a thing? there is no space there is water above! the stars are not suns they are light on the waters above! Eart is flat and NASA have been lying to you! Whatever you believe Believe in JESUS first and don't sin so I can save you and see you in heaven bro! Peace!
Would make perfect sense. The blackhole sucks in material into a singularity. Once it reaches a critical size the material explodes in a big bang forming the new universe. As the blackhole increases in size it pulls in exponentiallh more amounts from outside the event horizon which drives the accelerating expansion of the universe. This would explain why we can never see the edge of the universe as it expands close to the speed of light and we were formed billions of years after the initial big bang. It would also make sense when two black holes colliding create insane energy levels seen in pulsars as its effectively two old universes annihilating eachother. An infinite number of blackhole causing an infinite number of big bangs and creating an infinite number of universes. An ever perpetuating cycle.
Or rather gateways or opening to other universes outside of milky way. Which could explain space travel. Also side note if space is always expanding then maybe all our know space is a black hole so we could be in a black hole thats in a black hole?
Except it was wrong. The formula he used is for centripetal force and would give the wrong answer because r and v^2 are directly proportional (assuming force doesn't change as radius decreases), so if r decreases, then v also decreases. He should have said L= r x mv, where r and v are inversely proportional, so if r decreases, then v increases, which is the result we're expecting.
@@adamhuffman3354Life is significant and when you are blessed enough to understand how it functions you live that with every breath. Society is insignificant.
I like that idea essentially saying the Universe is in each and every one of us and we all create are own universe. I also think its very possible that black holes are like gateways to the multiverse of different universes, essentially converting matter of our own universe to the matter needed to feed other or different universes and vice a versa. If you were able to survive the trip through a black hole and were able to convert your matter into the matter of the universe for which you were headed you could essentially travel the multiverse. Allegedly 🤣🤣🤣🤣
If it is true, then the black hole we are inside of, need not be 'universe size' at all. Once it's formed, the universal constants (of our universe) will automatically fine-tune themselves to make 'sense' of our universe. So even if our parent black hole is the size of a typical supermassive black-hole.. our universal constants such as speed of light, time, mass, energy, etc will make sure that we can never reach its event horizon. So, in essence, from the perspective of our parent universe, we may be very tiny. And our speed of light may be barely equal to walking speed.. None of that will matter as both the universes can never interact. It's also possible that the supermassive black-holes of our universe may be housing similar parallel universes, with we having no means to interact with them. The event which we refer to as 'big bang' may be just the event that gave birth to our parent black hole.
I literally thought of this concept while tripping on acid. It made so much sense to me at the time but I haven’t been able to put it into words or fully understand it since. Great video
I had a similar experience once. Having an understanding without being able to put it into words. It think it started with a this thought, everything is in and out.
I saw a mosquito fly by me. I started to calculate how fast my hands should move to fly like that, what sensible material I could add to make my hands have more area, how much calories it would take and stuff. I almost had it before someone played a classical guitar and then I started on how to visualize music. Lol
It's moments like this that make me understand why keeping certain human' heads and brains working , i.e. Futurama, would be important. We need this man to be able to think and theorize for the next 1000 years.
Here is a thought experiment - If we (our universe) is in fact "inside" a black hole, that would mean that our universe is the byproduct of said black hole. As we know, our universe also contains black holes. So, is it possible that each of these black holes have created their own separate universes that are also within those black holes, which are in turn creating even more universes and even more black holes... and on, and on, through infinity?
But if we take mathematics into it, what kind of infinity are we living in then? Small or large infinity? Or maybe the black hole we can see in our universe is the small infinity, and our universe is the larger, but then there's more out of it. If it's really true, this make those insane mathematics' infinity types finally make sense in the real world.
I've been fascinated with the thought of it since first hearing of it, it's beautiful to me how it can seem so logical while only raising more questions, only seeming to conclude that the beginning of our universe was nowhere near the beginning of time
Eh sorta. If we are in a black hole it’s best not to think about time like how you’re thinking of it here. The entire lifespan of the universe would be over in an instant to someone outside of the singularity.
I was talking with a friend about this concept about a year ago after learning a bit about density, we also talked about how the edge of our universe could be the edge of a black hole. It's so cool to see the physics of it actually being discussed here!
Every day, we hear a new shallow theory attempting to explain the universe and to escape the undeniable truth of the existence of a Great Creator - vast in knowledge, wisdom, and power - worthy of glorification and worship. "And if you obey most of those upon the earth, they will mislead you from the way of Allah. They follow nothing but assumption, and they are only guessing." (Surah Al-An'am, 6:116) "And of His signs is the creation of the heavens and the earth and what He has dispersed throughout them of creatures. And He, for gathering them when He wills, is competent." (Surah Ash-Shura, 42:29)
Dude, you just blew my mind. It makes so much sense! You just dotted the 'i's' on what is most logical, but it raises so much more questions. In other words; more to come!
Your show really help me when I get depressed, maybe it's your voice or the things you say is just mind blowing and beautiful. Makes more sense than what's going on inside the mind
Well, even at 100, there should be a 50/50 split. But the problem is that the samples are not randomly picked. All measured galxies are close to us. Maybe this part of the universe has a spin to it, mirrored in the next part. Like wether systems in north/south of earth.
@@RudimusMaximus That’s not really how sampling size works. At least not for values you’d expect to be around 50%. It’s a decent enough statistical sample as long as you assume that the sampling method is reasonably random and unbiased. Think of it like a jar holding just two colors of M&Ms, and you want to estimate the true frequency of each. whether it’s ten thousand or ten billion m&ms in the jar,a random and unbiased sample of 300 will give you similar amounts of statical power. Though I’d be curious how astrophysicists go about estimating the bias of a given sampling technique.
Still demands an explanation. Is it really plausible for 2/3 of any group of 100 galaxies to rotate in the same direction? Maybe but I suspect more samples will reveal a similar 2/3 ratio
So our Big Bang was actually the moment some mass went into the black hole, thus creating our universe?… and does this mean that each black hole within our universe could potentially lead to a smaller universe?… 😮
Or the Big Bang happened inside this black hole we are in, as the singularity became unbalanced and went nuts. The whole known universe since the beginning was born in this one specific "universal black hole". The whole reality since the beginning of time has always been inside this black hole.
@@heebeejeebee-x3b White Holes are mathmatically feasable, more so feasable with the way Black Holes Invert Spacetime's properties, you can get a hypothetical White Hole SOMEWHERE in existance upon the creation of a Black Hole. Everything emerging from a singularity all at once does sound eerily like the properties of our Big Bang after all. And with the (for now) confirmed Acceleration of Spacetime, one could link the Hawking Radiation of our supposed Parent Black Hole to this acceleration, for as the Event Horison of the PBH shrinks, anything inside must therefore Expand. This is a crapshoot theory, since we have no way of understanding what the Time properties of this inverted spacetime has on the hypothetical White-hole that makes up our universe, or if entropy even has any influence past the Event Horizon
@@mrEofPlanetEarth Somehow I doubt that. Imagining the incredible gravitational forces involved and the over all motions (flux dynamics), the organised mass inside the bhs (stars, galaxies, etc.) would most prob get shatter into smallest constituant. Only to be slowly rebuilt through eons into a new "universe". Just an intuition ofc…
From your prospective in the black hole the entire universe would enter the black hole instantly behind you because the moment you enter the black hole time eventually stops for you and speeds up the universe to infinity so the new universe doesn’t start until all of the entire universe is dissolved into the black hole which for you is in an instant
7:13 - "What difference does it make?" For one thing, it offers an answer to the question of "what's inside of a black hole" which was previously thought to be as impossible to answer as what's outside the observable universe. Which is pretty nifty. And by proxy, it also offers a potential answer to the question of what's outside the observable universe while we're at it. And maybe why the universe is expanding. Insofar as any cosmology makes a difference in our lives, this feels like a pretty big one.
If we our universe is inside a black hole and there are black holes inside of our universe, then what's inside a black hole is not fundamentally different from what's outside of it, and by extension, not fundamentally different from what's outside of the observable universe. Then, inside/outside are just labels with only relative meaning, like dissecting an infinite continuum into slices which then gives rise to such virtual labels. There is no inside or outside, there just is.
@@anonsurferThe thing that could really blow the mind is that if all the black holes are actually just warping space-time in on itself. So stuff doesn't disappear but "spawns" somewhere else due to the warping. So the universe conserves energy, but constantly increases entropy, until it can't anymore, and then the universe itself falls back on itself and centers the energy again to restart the entropy
I'm writing a speculative fiction/fantasy novel that is reskinning the latest cosmological theories as fictional elements. The amount of times I get so excited when new updates still match/work within/add to my story! Thanks Neil! You and the rest of StarTalk will be getting a personalized thank you in the acknowledgements.
I've a similar but opposite response to climate data supporting my analysis and data supporting my forecasts of society 😢 I've grown to hate being right.
@@PrJACOBS11 i’ll promise to post here when it’s announced it’s getting published! Currently have 2 agents who have already asked for the full manuscript. ^^
This is a result of sin. Repent and believe the good news of Jesus Christ for eternal life. The good news : I Corinthians 15:3-4 NKJV [3] For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, [4] and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures,
It seems to be that our current science is not able to understand. Superintelligent AI , will 1000000% give us the answer. Quantum level AI IN SPECIFIC. Within our lifetime this will be answered
@@JonCampo91 yep no one thinks of a white whole because we dont see them now but they are compatible with general relativity but putting our galaxy at the center of anything is total heresy in big banger church circles
@@davetenhove9128 Yes because it assigns importance to humanity and the existence of a white hole at the center of our galaxy would do that. Its one thing if its proven our galaxy is special, so far nothing indicates that. Beyond it containing the only solar system with proven life its just a galaxy like the rest.
No, because all time would have elapsed on the other side of the “opening.” When you pass the event horizon, every moment of yours is equal to an eternity of the universe you left.
Our universe being a giant blackhole makes sense honestly. It would explain the universe constantly expanding (as our blackhole devours everything in its path) ultimately expanding our universe. You have to travel faster than the speed of light to leave our universe. A blackhole forming would begin our known existence. I think the universe is all based on blackholes and what they destroy and create at the same time. Its a neverending cycle, blackholes inside of blackholes. When something dies, new life begins.
thinking the exact same thing, well put. But the main question that is still in my mind is wouldnt everything inside a blackhole be crushed together, I dont understand how it can just leave to another universe with empty(ish) space between things?
@@KodomaNot an astronomer, but I think this is addressed in the video 01:45. The density of a black hole is dependent on its size. As black holes get really large (ie universe-sized) their internal density stops being crushingly high, and instead is something like what we have in our observable universe. There's still an event horizon (a perimeter that can't be traversed), but the inside of a universe-sized black hole would be no more crushed than our universe is. At least that's what the math says. I think.
I have another theory. Just image this. Using a computer not more than 10kg of weight, you can make a world-simulator with millions tons of mass & planet inside it. It's just a code essentially. In essence : We exist within what may be a naturally occurring simulator, born from a black hole that generated the fundamental forces and laws of nature just like a code in a computer.
Just image this, using a computer not more than 10kg of weight, you can make world-simulator with millions tons of mass inside it. It's just a code. In essence : We exist within what may be a naturally occurring simulator, born from a black hole that generated the fundamental forces and laws of nature.
This is a result of sin. Repent and believe the good news of Jesus Christ for eternal life. The good news of Jesus Christ: I Corinthians 15:3-4 NKJV [3] For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, [4] and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures,
I agree, perhaps (if we are in black hole) perhaps that black hole is in s bigger universe with even more black holes and they have also found they are in one as well. Would there be limitless different universes ? Likewise all the black holes we see, do they then form another universe ?
An intelligent sentient animal that lives in the deep ocean that never breaks the surface thinks the entire universe is filled with water and nothing else, and it probably thinks it is the center of the universe.
Currently living in or passed through a black hole. I also find it interesting that there would then be smaller black holes within a universe sized black hole.
@StarTalk I thought the assumption was that if you fell into a black hole, you would be ripped apart. That would imply that anything in the black hole is no longer in the form it was in prior to crossing the event horizon. So if we are in a black hole, that implies that prior to crossing the event horizon, "something was ripped apart", and the "pieces" of that thing eventually coalesced into whatever makes up our universe, perhaps billions of years after crossing that event horizon. And since we've observed black holes, that further implies that there are black holes inside of black holes since we wouldn't be able to see black holes that are outside the event horizon if we are inside. Oh man, my head hurts.
Yeah this is the problem I have with it. Even if I accept the imputation that a black hole is the boundary to another universe, to 'enter' that universe you first must be reduced to subatomic particulates, half of which will never enter and just be flung away. And then 14 billion years later you get to maybe be some type of life form again? Bit of a stretch.
And I would add that the gravity of the wormhole would be so great as to stop any rotation of matter. Either that, or it's not equal on all sides of the wormhole, which would cause a possible rotation on it's own, which would make all universes on the other side all spinning in the same direction, which we cannot know. (Yet.)
I agree. Have been thinking the same thing for ages. We don't yet have the hard evidence only revelation. As Einstein opined, imagination is more powerful than information.
I believe it was nothingness that became something, or matter. And, someday, there will be a "reverse" big bang where somethingness becomes nothing. And it's just goes in and out.
Same dude. I've kept saying a super massive black hole swallowed matter in another dimension and collapsed on itself and brought the big bang to our universe and birthed it. After billions of years of evolution, we're here today.
I’ve spent years chasing answers in documentaries, podcasts, even ancient texts-and none of it hit me the way The Obscured Principles book by Dorian Caine did. It’s like it was written for the few who are ready to break the illusion and remember who they really are.
That's definitely possible. All I know is that something changed and I don't like it. I want my previous life back! I mean, my previous life sucked, but our world/society was different and better in so many ways. I can't stand this current reality. How long do you guys think it'll be until something like this happens again? I sure hope our next reality is better than this one!
Every day, we hear a new shallow theory attempting to explain the universe and to escape the undeniable truth of the existence of a Great Creator - vast in knowledge, wisdom, and power - worthy of glorification and worship. "And of His signs is the creation of the heavens and the earth and what He has dispersed throughout them of creatures. And He, for gathering them when He wills, is competent." (Surah Ash-Shura, 42:29)
I remember hearing when I was younger (and this might be wrong, so feel free to correct me on this) that our universe was constantly expanding, with the prevailing theory that it was due to momentum from the big bang, but with this new theory in mind, what if the reason it's expanding is because more matter is continually being sucked in, therefore making the black hole we inhabit larger, and so it's internal edges should expand as well? At least that's the way I understand it based on the linear graph shown near the start
Or conversely, As the Parent Black Hole's event horizon shrinks due to Hawking Radiation, Inversely the Spacetime "inside" expands, since the mathmatical properties of spacetime inside a black hole's Event Horizon are inversed, 3D Space becomes 3D Time and 1D Time becomes 1D Space, and a hypothetical White Hole made from the formation of this black hole would have it's Time run in reverse to the PBH (Parent Black Hole). I Hypothesize that our universe Is that hypothetical White Hole From this, A correlation can be made between the Exponential increase in Hawking radiation as the Horizon's Surface Area (it's Space) Decreases Vs The Exponential Accelleration of SpaceTime as Time Increases. Though your idea about Matter being sucked into the Parent Black Hole influencing the universe inside also has weight in this hypothetical, as there was a period in our universe's timeline where there was a massive Deaccelleration of Spacetime (relative to the Inflation Era) just after the first fundamental particles started forming, (currently explained by Gravity), however this could be also explained as the increase in surface area of the event horison increasing as the rate at which it gobbles up all of the matter available to it outpaces the rate at which Hawking Radiation can evaporate that energy away, and then by the time our universe is 8.8 Billion years old, The PBH can no longer eat more than it evaporates, and thus the age of Accelleration begins! One Major contender for a black hole that fits the description of something that Feasts for so long is actually the black holes that become our Super Massive Black Holes at the centre of our galaxies, As they have been able to feed for the longest. The Hubble Tension is a sore spot for this hypothetical, because we're still unsure Why the CMB is at odds with our current measurements, However If future scientists discover that the Cosmological Constant has increased from what we calculate now, it could give us insight as to what mechanics are at play with the expansion of the universe, and possibly confirm hypotheses we are commenting on this very video!
If our universe is a black hole, and our universe contains black holes also, then cosmos is just the biggest Matryoshka toy containing all other universes contained within, which possibly solves every known and unknown problem of Quantum Gravity.
@@Dinofx_jr That tiny rectangular mustache above your lip seems to be making it hard for you to NOT attack people for kindly having an opinion. Fascinating... where would we be as a society without those who make others afraid to share their thoughts?
I assure you it's beyond Tyson's ability. Tyson's understanding of science could be jotted down on the back of a stamp with room left for his name and address.
It’s like that Pirates of the Caribbean movie “You best start believing in ghost stories, Miss Turner... you’re in one” but with black holes…you’re in one.
4:40 Hi Niel! Actually, the angular velocity does not scale as inversely proportional to the radius, but rather to its square. You mention mv^2/r, but that is the centripetal force which isn't the relevant quantity here. The angular momentum for a point mass is mvr, which is mωr^2 where ω=dθ/dt. Therefore, conservation of angular momentum increases the rotational speed by the inverse square of the radius, i.e. 1/2 the radius rotates 4 times as fast.
@@MikePimanno the original comment is right, L=I * omega and for L to be conserved I have I=mr^2 for point masses and so if I decrease the radius from 1 to 1/2 then r^2=1/4 and then for L to be conserved omega (angular velocity) must quadruple. Even for extended objects the moment of inertia is proportional to mr^2 so it holds still. Mv^2/r is indeed centripetal force and you can check because it has units of force.
6:28 - What if the Big Bang wasn't statistically even? In some directions, there could've been more mass, in others, more... Time? Or dark matter. If that explosion wasn't a ball, but was something misshapen, there could've been some starting rotation.
Big Bang didn't exactly have a size. Since there was no space to begin with, the "location" of the big bang was "everywhere". Which means in the end it has no single location, so no third dimensional exposion from a single point.
Everything just appeared at once, like you would through ingredients for a pizza on the table and then you put more, bake it and then give it some shape
@@stefanfyhn4668which came first, the chicken or the egg? That's the dilemma between the "Big Bang" and "Big Crunch" theories. We don't know which is correct.
So funny thing is that I've been saying this for the past 3 YEARS ever since I learned that black holes cause time dilation. And then I had thought what if the time we are feeling is sped up because we are in a black hole. Then I started thinking if several other things were black holes, like the great attractor or the supermassive void. I've have been saying this for years and seriously the second that I saw an article online about it I felt a sense of I knew it.
My favourite "theory" (I have been informed it's Lee Smolin's theory), for lack of a better word, on the subject is that all black holes are seeds for other universes with slightly different "dna" than their parent universe, meaning slightly different constants in their laws of physics. Of course it's very universe-centric to see things this way, as if the cosmos mirrors the cycle of life we observe in our universe, but I guess that's why it's so poetic.
I can honestly say that’s an interesting idea and I’ve honestly never heard of anything close to that. But I wonder what came first the universe or the black hole?🤔
not really. even though there are quintillions of blackholes in our universe, the universe inside all those blackholes are one and the same, not individual separate universes. sound weird, but it's true. think about this, what happens when 2 blackholes merge?
My favorite tidbit about black hole cosmology - is that white holes do exist, but they are temporal to those inside a black hole: they're an event in the past that exerts so much temporal force that it's nearly impossible to travel towards it (as it would require traveling backwards in time)
not really. for all the blackholes in our universe, the universe inside those blackholes are one and the same universe, not separate universes. why do you think that is true?
If this is true, then what's inside the black hole in the black hole in the black hole we are living in? And what's outside the black hole of the black hole of our black hole universe? That make the scale of the universe even more terrifying.
This title/theory broke my brain for a minute before clicking on the video where I was imagining other universes inside known black holes in our own observable universe. The possibilities are simultaneously mind-bendingly awesome and kind of depressing to think about. What if intelligent life does exist in other worlds inside other black holes, but we're destined to never meet or interact due to how the universe works? Also, what does this theory mean for dark matter? Could be a key to figuring that out! Very interesting stuff.
The best thing about science, is you can ask some of the most obscene thoughts, yet still take what you can observe at full face value, while HOPEFULLY learning from it somehow, if not, adjust a minor detail and try again.
This is a result of sin. Repent and believe the good news of Jesus Christ for eternal life. I Corinthians 15:3-4 NKJV [3] For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, [4] and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures,
I've suspected for quite awhile that we may be inside an evaporating black hole, with the big bang being the singularity falling apart and spreading outward.
@@atlasfeynman1039 Many theoretical physicists think black holes evaporate over time due to Hawking radiation. This concept isn't nonsensical just because you personally haven't heard of it.
So couldn't that mean the roughly 40 quintillion black hole in the observable universe are all their own universes themselves that were born out of our own black hole universe? That could mean we've got a super web of universes where each black hole could have their own 40 quintillion black holes at their own scale, all with universes of their own? Infinity goes in both directions, from the infinitely large to the infinitely small, so there's some room to work with.
It sure seems if this were the case the main material used to make a universe would have to be the imploded then regurgitated remains of a super massive star. (That is what makes black holes in this universe) So would there be enough of anything to make a whole universe off of one star plus anything it could find to eat close to it? It seems these would be countless little bitty new universes if that is what's happening. Whatever we would be made from would be unbelievably huge by human scales.
our universe has quintillions of blackholes, but all those universes inside them are one and the same universe. why? when two blackholes merge, the inside universe experience no change. why?
So what's the verdict, do you believe we're living inside a black hole or not?
is our black hole in another blackhole ?
I think it's just one big simulation. Which would be cool is you ask me
We are
Is that mathematically possible?
I think we’re just lucky to be alive
When I was a kid in Uzbekistan, I watched your documentaries dubbed in Uzbek because I didn’t know English. Now, years later, I’m watching you in English, understanding every word and it feels limitless. Thank you, Dr. Tyson, for being a voice that opened my mind to the cosmos long before I understood the language. You have inspired a lifelong journey of curiosity. With all my heart - thank you.
That is amazing! Congrats!
This is awesome thank you for sharing!
I'm a native English speaker and your comment here really made me think of how much I take my native language for granted.
I have been to Uzbekistan, it is a beautiful country and wonderful people! Growing up in the US in the 70s and 80s, we had never heard of Uzbekistan, just USSR. I have been twice to Tashkent on business, but made friends I know I will still have decades from now. I can even make plov! I am oshpaz! 😊
Is our universe inside Uzbekistan 🤔😦
bu katta yutuq do'st :D
Well I think it explains why socks disappear in the dryer.
Terry Pratchett's 'Eater of Socks'
ruclips.net/video/moktfajxND8/video.htmlsi=bwSCBJqVgbDp0pWF
Best comment ever on YT
I thought it was a glitch in the simulation
”We took care of the glitch.” Bob Slydell
That begs the question: If we are in a black hole and we have observed black holes within our frame of reference. How dense can matter get? It's like the square of a square. If we're in a black hole and we have local black holes, do those black holes also contain black holes? Where does that end and what does that entail when we extrapolate out the end of our universe?
it's turtles all the way down
Also in the reverse, what if our black hole is in another exterior universe. Then what if our black hole got absorbed by another exterior black hole 😵💫
If you dont know about white holes yet, that is a great place to start getting answers.
2:23 - From this explanation, it would seem we have already expanded from the other side of a BH, meaning the BB was when we were at the highest compression point before exiting! Therefore, BHs are now able to form again in 'normal' space?
Of course they do contain other black holes, i think if you leave your local blackhole you jump upwards a dimension. Some said there are 16 d-s, so...were never going to know, but most likely thats whats up
I really appreciate his way of explaining extremely difficult concepts into ways the average person not in physics can understand!!
Have you tried understanding a theory or hypothesis without just giving up? It's like reading a difficult book, you gotta read a paragraph a couple times and then eventually it clicks.
he's wrong, and he was sent a Discrete Relativity that was proven that he ignores. We already have answers to these questions, but there is an active contingent of Einstein worshippers that is suppressing it.
"And if we were, what difference does it make?"
Sir, respectfully, this just elevated my sense of existential dread to a whole new level.
lol it should open your mind to happiness because none of it matters in the long run, whether you are in reality or simulation, or black hole, the present moment you are experiencing is the same. So it literally doesn't matter in any sense that is relevant to your life. Except to expand your mind!
I actually found it to be the complete opposite. I feel a combination of peace and awe. It's like everything is a well oiled, perfectly designed machine that destroys and gives birth in an infinite loop.
Just like how living beings reproduce, i think the big bang was just a white hole at the other end of a black hole giving birth to a new universe... and that black holes in our current universe will in turn give birth to their own respective universes. Its like a cosmic breeding ground on an incomprehensibly massive scale... and that is cool AF.
@@Puppetmaster2005 ooooh yeah !❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉
Not an ant's fart in a canyon. It's all BS.
Welcome to the party.
It never ends, you can't leave, and nobody knows what the party is even for.
"Two thirds is not one hundred percent, but it's definitely more than half"
The kind of insight I'm here for. Thanks Neil.
That was the only thing he said that I already knew. Oh. And also the thing with ice skater.
No
but spin direction is nonsensical if there is no up or down
I wouldn't trust this dude reading my vacuum cleaner assembly instructions. If there could ever be a bigger shill than this blowhard I'd pay money to meet them.
everybody knows 2/3 is 66%
“I’ll reserve judgement until I see what others publish” - the most important line of this video
So if we’re in a black hole, does that mean there was no Big Bang? So instead of a big bang, there was just a point where our universe had enough critical mass to start?
@@Kurtiskurtical What if it was a big bang but inside the confines of a black hole when all light was first drawn in at the very start? Like a black hole forming when a massive star dies? So our galaxy was formed from the condensed remnants of a massive star dying.
@originalpeasant8179 that is a mind blowing thought & makes crazy sense!!
@@Kurtiskurtical Or it could mean that our "big bang" is actually relatively SMALL in the grand scale of things.
This should be a mandatory reminder at the end of any article relating to the results of a scientific experiment
The idea of "black hole universes all the way up" being a possible reality makes the adage "turtles all the way down" so much funnier to me
I always took it that this kind of thing was what TP was alluding to.
So for 100 years scientists were scratching their heads trying to figure out what happens inside black holes, where our understanding of physics fails, only to find out we have been in the black hole the whole time? Poetic
It makes sense, which in no way is enough proof to say for certain, but it's still fascinating. Physicists hypothesized that to travel to another universe, you would need to create a hole in spacetime. How do you do that? With extreme pressure focused on a single point; like a blackhole with monumental gravitational pressure bearing down on a singularity. The singularity being defined as "a theoretical condition in which gravity is predicted to be so intense that spacetime itself would break down catastrophically" really makes you wonder if spacetime breaking down at the singularity of a blackhole creates the conditions necessary to leave our universe for another!
All we'd have to do is send a probe to the edge of the universe and wait for something to come in... to know for sure.
@@RagTheWorldthe human population would be longggggg gone before the probe reached the edge of the universe, we would die out before it even got close not to mention the universe is constantly expanding
@@RagTheWorld Well... the black hole universe model says that nothing can come in from outside of it because all matter that could enter was already part of the original collapse-there’s no ongoing inflow. On top of that, the universe is unbounded, so there's no physical edge to send a probe to. It would be like flying a drone across the surface of the earth expecting to find an end.
I mean, it (the premise of our entire history and existence having occurred inside a black hole) could spawn easily dozens of Sci-Fi works. It’s so interesting that a falsified tenet of the black hole, the abyssal vacuum devoid absolutely of time and phenomena, mainly created such an entity in our imaginations. We stopped at the precipice, not allowing for a fundamental connection to survive; or so the case may be.
One of the things I find most interesting about growing older is witnessing the development of knowledge. We now know or understand much more then when I was a child and this alone motivates me to stay curious about all and everything that life brings, both good and bad.
Don't watch this if you want to get smarter because he is lying
@CravenM1980 Oh please, he is an incredible scientist!
@@CravenM1980 Lying? About what and where?
@@CravenM1980 Let me guess: you believe some kind of Marvel Superhero called god created the universe, right? Instead of accepting scientific findings you believe a fairy tale. Got ya.
@@anadd6195he does tell cool fairy tales, but he is no scientist. This theory has little scientific ground, if you want to go there. But it’s interesting to explore - there’s that.
7:16 "and if we were, what difference does it make?" That idea applies to so many things... Love this guy!
What difference did comment make?
@@Sweeti924 ALL THE DIFFERENCE IN THE WORLD…. AAWOOOOOOOO!
@@Sweeti924 enough of difference to make you reply :)
The difference is that the multiverse theory is suddenly way more logical
It made no sense for him to say that. Never expected that from him
Incredible theory. The most amazing thing is just that it perfectly makes sense. Because it also explains that our universe doesn’t appeared out of nowhere, but is transformed other universe, and maybe it goes back and forth
Damn more StarTalk when I was going to bed. That's the real blackhole I can't escape
😂
Genni had a 20lb black hole removed from her asche
🤣
On the contrary I watch it to make me fall asleep
Neil D. Tyson's Black Hole
Me explaining to my Wife why I went out for "One beer with friends" and got home at 3:15 A.M.
Yeah, these "Black Holes" can be very sweet!
I only know of 1 black hole idk what this guys talking about
Got that from Key and Peele.
No actually but im gonna look up now 😂@cliff9887
So you got in your friend’s black holes? I’m proud of you for being comfortable enough to share that with us
It's like good bacteria finally discovering that they exist in somebody's gut.
Time will tell whether or not we end up being "good" bacteria.
Uh oh; the host just swallowed an antibiotic!
😂
Got news for ya. Humanity aren’t the “good” bacteria. Look around at how we treat the world and each other.
And getting pooped out into another unfamiliar universe.
As someone who deeply admires you and values critical thinking and scientific reasoning-within my humble capacities-I found this episode both fascinating and humbling. The notion of a cosmic horizon beyond which no information has yet reached us is a powerful reminder that our understanding of the universe is inherently limited.
Even with all our telescopes, equations, and expanding models, there are entire regions of reality we simply cannot access-perhaps ever. And yet, science progresses not by pretending to know everything, but by honestly acknowledging what we don’t know. That, to me, is what makes science beautiful: its commitment to evidence, its tolerance for uncertainty, and its refusal to overpromise.
Thanks, Neil, for always reminding us how vast, mysterious, and thrillingly unreachable the universe still is
I'm immediately reminded of the episode of Futurama where they find out their universe is contained inside a box residing in a parallel universe version of Planet Express HQ, and that parallel universe simultaneously exists inside a box residing in their own Planet Express HQ.
That show is amazing. My sons favourite show to this day.
Or how at the end of men in black our universe were marbles aliens were playing with.
so is the cat in the box alive or dead :-)
I love that show!!!
F I need to rewatch Futurama!!
I'll be honest, I started watching this video dubious about whether or not our universe resides inside a black hole, and ended the video thinking it may be very well plausible. I love your concise explanations, Neil. It's the mark of a good communicator and teacher, and it brings science to everyone.
Omg hi Neil
Thanks for being honest.
Yes, our Universe is definitely rotating, but it's not a "black hole"...
Everything, from the only 2 existing fundamental particles of opposite charge (the electron & positron) to the whole finite Universe, is pure rotational energy with eternally conserved angular momentum, in an infinite chain of dynamic cycles of expansion and contraction with no beginning and no end.
The Standard Model of Particle Physics (a cool math game of illusory statistics & probabilities) with all of its fantastical Quantum Zhait soup, is wrong. Imho, Ernest Sternglass discovered the closest thing we have to a ToE, and XiangHe masterfully interpreted it in the most simple, sound, and logically coherent way I've encountered.
*cough gatekeeper
@@v1kt0u5 Cosmologists have looked for signs of large-scale rotation of the universe (a global "spin" or preferred direction) and found no compelling evidence. The cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) is extremely uniform and isotropic, which strongly suggests that the universe is not rotating as a whole.
A rotating universe would violate cosmological principles (homogeneity and isotropy) and could have observable consequences, such as anisotropies in the CMB, which we don’t see.
Yes, angular momentum is conserved in physics. However, not everything is “pure rotational energy.” Particles and systems have various forms of energy - kinetic, potential, rest mass energy, thermal, electromagnetic, etc.
Spin is a property of particles (like electrons), but calling them “pure rotational energy” misrepresents the quantum nature of spin - it's not classical rotation, but a fundamental quantum number.
The idea of “eternally conserved angular momentum” at the universal scale is speculative and not part of any accepted physical theory.
to be honest: the horizon of the universe being an event horizon would make it so much easier regarding the question "what is behind the universe horizon? What is in the space where the universe is expanding into?" Well with a black hole it makes so much more sense
Right but it doesn't really satisfy the original question because then you just change it to what's outside the universe of the black hole we're inside, and if it's black holes all the way up, do you really feel satisfied with that answer either?
Heaven? Maybe we cracked the code..@@12thstreetrag
This would explain how the mass of our universe is expanding, because more mass would be falling into the black hole.
What if time is moving faster in the universe outside of our black hole? Then as more mass falls into the black hole it is both in the black hole and we cannot perceive it because it hasn't entered the universe in our timeline.
This could explain dark matter.
@@jesusvaldez2832 You're misunderstanding it. There isn't more mass. The universe is expanding with the same amount of mass inside it. Same amount of now then when the big bang happened.
Nice. This is now my second most favorite talk about holes
Since we observe black holes inside our own black hole, it seem likely we could be inside an infinite number of black holes. That means there is no mysteries as to what goes on inside a black hole because we are directly observing one from the inside.
Why would the contents of one black hole be the same as another? That doesn’t follow at all.
Don't worry, there are still mysteries. Some physicists speculate if the fundamental physical parameters like the neutron/proton mass ratio or the number 137 might have different values in different universes or even regions of the universe.
It’ll be preferable if we distinguish between observing a black hole’s mysterious properties, occurrence, and learn about such phenomena considering that we don’t live in one, therefore makes it difficult to understand such phenomena and understanding a black is considered a complication because we are occupying inside a black hole.
Wasn't that an episode of Futurama?
What if they are the exits
Black holes feels like a glitch in a video game that needs to be patched
We are all in a video game ... but inside a game glitch?
There are no black holes, the creation is perfect, why would God create such a thing? there is no space there is water above! the stars are not suns they are light on the waters above! Eart is flat and NASA have been lying to you! Whatever you believe Believe in JESUS first and don't sin so I can save you and see you in heaven bro! Peace!
@@helomusicc 😂😂😂😂😂
@@helomusicc You are not a real Christian, and you use the name of your saviour in vain.
😮
Makes me wonder if the Big Bang would coincide with the moment the black hole containing our universe first became a black hole.
Thought the same thing 🤯
I love thinking about this stuff bro. It's so COOL!
Would make perfect sense. The blackhole sucks in material into a singularity. Once it reaches a critical size the material explodes in a big bang forming the new universe. As the blackhole increases in size it pulls in exponentiallh more amounts from outside the event horizon which drives the accelerating expansion of the universe. This would explain why we can never see the edge of the universe as it expands close to the speed of light and we were formed billions of years after the initial big bang. It would also make sense when two black holes colliding create insane energy levels seen in pulsars as its effectively two old universes annihilating eachother.
An infinite number of blackhole causing an infinite number of big bangs and creating an infinite number of universes. An ever perpetuating cycle.
Or maybe a "black mole" on God's behind?
@@shallowkal Umm... the universe at the outside edge is expanding _faster_ than the speed of light.
I love the analogy linking the motion of a rotating galaxy with a rotating ice dancer.
If our universe exists inside a black hole, then it follows that black holes within our universe could themselves contain other universes.
WHAT LIKE TINY UNIVERSES FOR ANTS, GET OUT OF HERE!!!
Or rather gateways or opening to other universes outside of milky way. Which could explain space travel.
Also side note if space is always expanding then maybe all our know space is a black hole so we could be in a black hole thats in a black hole?
@@LanceNorman-i5r you forget that a black hole has an event horizon. Nothing, even not light can pass that horizon.
@@echman1347
No, like other universes as big as ours.
@@oysteinsoreide4323it can pass into int but not escape
I'm supposed to be working, but OKAY NEIL, I will listen.
For real
100% Neil's fault. He needs to be more mindful of his upload times 😂
Air traffic shmair traffic 😅😂
Damn.....me too
Isn't the pursuit of knowledge, a universal duty for all human beings? You're working on yourself
The self check was dope, Neil. Glad that was emphasized and not cut out.
Agree.
Except it was wrong. The formula he used is for centripetal force and would give the wrong answer because r and v^2 are directly proportional (assuming force doesn't change as radius decreases), so if r decreases, then v also decreases. He should have said
L= r x mv, where r and v are inversely proportional, so if r decreases, then v increases, which is the result we're expecting.
@@zm6301 Must be frustrating being smarter the Neil degrass tyson and no one believes you
@@bjarnesiggaard9160 LMAO
@@zm6301I wouldn’t know, but it was cute, anyway.
Every universe is that universe that opened up in front of the one that ended behind it. Nothing ever truly dies.
Yea everything about us is in our heads. There’s no significance to us at all. Electrical impulses that fade in and out for eternity.
@@adamhuffman3354Life is significant and when you are blessed enough to understand how it functions you live that with every breath. Society is insignificant.
I like that idea essentially saying the Universe is in each and every one of us and we all create are own universe. I also think its very possible that black holes are like gateways to the multiverse of different universes, essentially converting matter of our own universe to the matter needed to feed other or different universes and vice a versa. If you were able to survive the trip through a black hole and were able to convert your matter into the matter of the universe for which you were headed you could essentially travel the multiverse. Allegedly 🤣🤣🤣🤣
My first thought when I heard that the Universe might be spinning was that seems like it would increase the likelihood that we are in a black hole. 😂
This makes more sense than my existential dread would like to admit…
If it is true, then the black hole we are inside of, need not be 'universe size' at all.
Once it's formed, the universal constants (of our universe) will automatically fine-tune themselves to make 'sense' of our universe.
So even if our parent black hole is the size of a typical supermassive black-hole.. our universal constants such as speed of light, time, mass, energy, etc will make sure that we can never reach its event horizon.
So, in essence, from the perspective of our parent universe, we may be very tiny. And our speed of light may be barely equal to walking speed.. None of that will matter as both the universes can never interact.
It's also possible that the supermassive black-holes of our universe may be housing similar parallel universes, with we having no means to interact with them.
The event which we refer to as 'big bang' may be just the event that gave birth to our parent black hole.
The UNIVERSE is spinning. NOT in a black hole. The Mayan Calender is the Sun going around our Universe.
@themonkster333 Uhhh what? 😂
I literally thought of this concept while tripping on acid. It made so much sense to me at the time but I haven’t been able to put it into words or fully understand it since. Great video
Lmao 😂 been there
Mind bending
I had a similar experience once. Having an understanding without being able to put it into words. It think it started with a this thought, everything is in and out.
I saw a mosquito fly by me. I started to calculate how fast my hands should move to fly like that, what sensible material I could add to make my hands have more area, how much calories it would take and stuff.
I almost had it before someone played a classical guitar and then I started on how to visualize music. Lol
It's moments like this that make me understand why keeping certain human' heads and brains working , i.e. Futurama, would be important. We need this man to be able to think and theorize for the next 1000 years.
An Indian and an Englishman proposed this theory many years ago. Niel is great, but he is just informing the public.
Nope. We need fewer of his rotten ilk.
Im so happy to hear people talking about this
Here is a thought experiment - If we (our universe) is in fact "inside" a black hole, that would mean that our universe is the byproduct of said black hole. As we know, our universe also contains black holes. So, is it possible that each of these black holes have created their own separate universes that are also within those black holes, which are in turn creating even more universes and even more black holes... and on, and on, through infinity?
Light seems the common denominator….running to get two mirrors to look into forever, forever, forever,
But if we take mathematics into it, what kind of infinity are we living in then? Small or large infinity? Or maybe the black hole we can see in our universe is the small infinity, and our universe is the larger, but then there's more out of it.
If it's really true, this make those insane mathematics' infinity types finally make sense in the real world.
@@anstractreasoner The mirror analogy is applicable since the visual infinity it presents is an 'illusion'...
@@worawatli8952 It get's even better when you apply "chicken or egg" logic - Which came first, the Black Hole, or the Universe that created it?
@@shirtcreekink which would make our universe also a jhinn particle itself if you take it to the chicken and egg logic, right?
Man, I was waiting for this episode for so long! Thank you Neil!
My gift to you all 🎉
The Connections (2021) [short documentary] ❤
Dominion (2018)
Yep! And this universe does sit inside of a black hole. 💯
It's a clip and Neil is about 2 years late talking about this.
I've been fascinated with the thought of it since first hearing of it, it's beautiful to me how it can seem so logical while only raising more questions, only seeming to conclude that the beginning of our universe was nowhere near the beginning of time
Just the beginning of our own time I suppose.
Eh sorta. If we are in a black hole it’s best not to think about time like how you’re thinking of it here. The entire lifespan of the universe would be over in an instant to someone outside of the singularity.
There doesn’t seem to have been a clock that started ticking at the moment that our universe began, measuring the chronology of everything.
What’s up with that?? 😂😂😂 I just pictured SNL Keenan
The last sentence is perhaps the best part. I absolutely loved this video.
I was talking with a friend about this concept about a year ago after learning a bit about density, we also talked about how the edge of our universe could be the edge of a black hole. It's so cool to see the physics of it actually being discussed here!
Every day, we hear a new shallow theory attempting to explain the universe and to escape the undeniable truth of the existence of a Great Creator - vast in knowledge, wisdom, and power - worthy of glorification and worship.
"And if you obey most of those upon the earth, they will mislead you from the way of Allah. They follow nothing but assumption, and they are only guessing."
(Surah Al-An'am, 6:116)
"And of His signs is the creation of the heavens and the earth and what He has dispersed throughout them of creatures. And He, for gathering them when He wills, is competent."
(Surah Ash-Shura, 42:29)
@@kash5797Brother, you’re beliefs and opinions are just as valid as others. Stop trying to act like you’re beliefs are superior.
@@kash5797You’re too indoctrinated to talk to. Never mind, have a good day.
Yes but is it a coincidence that the sphere of vision matches de same sphere we could view taking the increase of space in to account.
Dude, you just blew my mind. It makes so much sense!
You just dotted the 'i's' on what is most logical, but it raises so much more questions.
In other words; more to come!
I discovered this channel right now.. waiting for this by years! I love these contents 😮
Your show really help me when I get depressed, maybe it's your voice or the things you say is just mind blowing and beautiful. Makes more sense than what's going on inside the mind
How are we alive then if we are inside a black hole?
It's a beautiful distraction, isn't it?
When you get depressed, realize how small your problems really are.
My gift to you all 🎉
The Connections (2021) [short documentary] ❤
Dominion (2018)
That’s what I love about the laws of nature. They usually make sense.
6:56 yeahhhhh just a few hundred galaxies is a pretty astronomically small sample size lol
Agree. In a universe of billions trillions and quintillions….a few hundred isn’t going to cut it.
Well, even at 100, there should be a 50/50 split. But the problem is that the samples are not randomly picked. All measured galxies are close to us. Maybe this part of the universe has a spin to it, mirrored in the next part. Like wether systems in north/south of earth.
@@RudimusMaximus That’s not really how sampling size works. At least not for values you’d expect to be around 50%. It’s a decent enough statistical sample as long as you assume that the sampling method is reasonably random
and unbiased. Think of it like a jar holding just two colors of M&Ms, and you want to estimate the true frequency of each. whether it’s ten thousand or ten billion m&ms in the jar,a random and unbiased sample of 300 will give you similar amounts of statical power. Though I’d be curious how astrophysicists go about estimating the bias of a given sampling technique.
Still relative though!
Still demands an explanation. Is it really plausible for 2/3 of any group of 100 galaxies to rotate in the same direction? Maybe but I suspect more samples will reveal a similar 2/3 ratio
So our Big Bang was actually the moment some mass went into the black hole, thus creating our universe?… and does this mean that each black hole within our universe could potentially lead to a smaller universe?… 😮
Miniverse
Or the Big Bang happened inside this black hole we are in, as the singularity became unbalanced and went nuts. The whole known universe since the beginning was born in this one specific "universal black hole". The whole reality since the beginning of time has always been inside this black hole.
Rather, our universe emerged from a white hole
@@heebeejeebee-x3b White Holes are mathmatically feasable, more so feasable with the way Black Holes Invert Spacetime's properties, you can get a hypothetical White Hole SOMEWHERE in existance upon the creation of a Black Hole. Everything emerging from a singularity all at once does sound eerily like the properties of our Big Bang after all.
And with the (for now) confirmed Acceleration of Spacetime, one could link the Hawking Radiation of our supposed Parent Black Hole to this acceleration, for as the Event Horison of the PBH shrinks, anything inside must therefore Expand.
This is a crapshoot theory, since we have no way of understanding what the Time properties of this inverted spacetime has on the hypothetical White-hole that makes up our universe, or if entropy even has any influence past the Event Horizon
That was my exact thought process. Our current big bang theory has some flaws but maybe if we look at it again with this in mind?
I am working on a new theory myself and this was the conclusion i came to a few days ago without previous knowledge my mind is blown
So in theory. What happens with the two universe inside when two super black holes merge into one?
A white hole appears in one or both?
We probably wouldn't feel it because of how huge space is, it would just be bigger but still outside our own tiny observable portion.
@@mrEofPlanetEarth Somehow I doubt that. Imagining the incredible gravitational forces involved and the over all motions (flux dynamics), the organised mass inside the bhs (stars, galaxies, etc.) would most prob get shatter into smallest constituant. Only to be slowly rebuilt through eons into a new "universe". Just an intuition ofc…
From your prospective in the black hole the entire universe would enter the black hole instantly behind you because the moment you enter the black hole time eventually stops for you and speeds up the universe to infinity so the new universe doesn’t start until all of the entire universe is dissolved into the black hole which for you is in an instant
@@zevak1makes sense to me
7:13 - "What difference does it make?"
For one thing, it offers an answer to the question of "what's inside of a black hole" which was previously thought to be as impossible to answer as what's outside the observable universe. Which is pretty nifty. And by proxy, it also offers a potential answer to the question of what's outside the observable universe while we're at it. And maybe why the universe is expanding. Insofar as any cosmology makes a difference in our lives, this feels like a pretty big one.
If we our universe is inside a black hole and there are black holes inside of our universe, then what's inside a black hole is not fundamentally different from what's outside of it, and by extension, not fundamentally different from what's outside of the observable universe.
Then, inside/outside are just labels with only relative meaning, like dissecting an infinite continuum into slices which then gives rise to such virtual labels.
There is no inside or outside, there just is.
@@anonsurferThe thing that could really blow the mind is that if all the black holes are actually just warping space-time in on itself.
So stuff doesn't disappear but "spawns" somewhere else due to the warping.
So the universe conserves energy, but constantly increases entropy, until it can't anymore, and then the universe itself falls back on itself and centers the energy again to restart the entropy
So would the universe outside be aging at a billion years a second?
@@anonsurfer”as above so below”
That was my first thought as well: "oh so that's why we're expanding". More stuff is being sucked in all the time.
I'm writing a speculative fiction/fantasy novel that is reskinning the latest cosmological theories as fictional elements. The amount of times I get so excited when new updates still match/work within/add to my story! Thanks Neil! You and the rest of StarTalk will be getting a personalized thank you in the acknowledgements.
I've a similar but opposite response to climate data supporting my analysis and data supporting my forecasts of society 😢 I've grown to hate being right.
Where would I be able to check your book out when it’s complete?
@@PrJACOBS11 i’ll promise to post here when it’s announced it’s getting published! Currently have 2 agents who have already asked for the full manuscript. ^^
This is a result of sin. Repent and believe the good news of Jesus Christ for eternal life.
The good news :
I Corinthians 15:3-4 NKJV
[3] For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, [4] and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures,
@kay12 will you record an audiobook? I have better concentration consuming books audibly and would like to listen to your story
Earned 200k$ today! Started with 50k$ just two months ago-grateful for all the guidance.
How do you earn so much? What’s your strategy?
The digital market is a goldmine, but expert guidance is key-Ms. Sophie Rogerz won’t steer you wrong.
How!? I know it’s possible-please show me!
Sophie Rogerz? A friend introduced us. My husband and I grew in real estate thanks to her.
I keep hearing about Ms. SophieRogerz.She must be amazing!
This is why i love fibonnacci sequence because one push, momentum , misdirection can cause a whole avalanche of force
Question - if were in a black hole , why do we observe black holes ? Does that mean black holes form inside of others then ?
It seems to be that our current science is not able to understand. Superintelligent AI , will 1000000% give us the answer. Quantum level AI IN SPECIFIC. Within our lifetime this will be answered
@@JHippo51 what a load of 💩
AI doesn’t think for itself
@@UpTheCattersyet . It is widely known that we are creating super intelligence
It's just turtles all the way down.
its like those russians dolls. There his a hole inside of a hole inside of a hole
Wouldn't that mean there is a center to our universe at which matter is pouring into our universe from somewhere else?
Yes a white hole, which would also explain the expansion of the universe.
@@JonCampo91 yep no one thinks of a white whole because we dont see them now but they are compatible with general relativity but putting our galaxy at the center of anything is total heresy in big banger church circles
@@JonCampo91 can we go back to it
@@davetenhove9128 Yes because it assigns importance to humanity and the existence of a white hole at the center of our galaxy would do that. Its one thing if its proven our galaxy is special, so far nothing indicates that. Beyond it containing the only solar system with proven life its just a galaxy like the rest.
No, because all time would have elapsed on the other side of the “opening.” When you pass the event horizon, every moment of yours is equal to an eternity of the universe you left.
My favorite human. He’s always so happy talking about things he loves.
Our universe being a giant blackhole makes sense honestly. It would explain the universe constantly expanding (as our blackhole devours everything in its path) ultimately expanding our universe. You have to travel faster than the speed of light to leave our universe. A blackhole forming would begin our known existence. I think the universe is all based on blackholes and what they destroy and create at the same time. Its a neverending cycle, blackholes inside of blackholes. When something dies, new life begins.
Black hole fractals
Damn Skippy
thinking the exact same thing, well put. But the main question that is still in my mind is wouldnt everything inside a blackhole be crushed together, I dont understand how it can just leave to another universe with empty(ish) space between things?
@@KodomaNot an astronomer, but I think this is addressed in the video 01:45. The density of a black hole is dependent on its size. As black holes get really large (ie universe-sized) their internal density stops being crushingly high, and instead is something like what we have in our observable universe. There's still an event horizon (a perimeter that can't be traversed), but the inside of a universe-sized black hole would be no more crushed than our universe is. At least that's what the math says. I think.
I have another theory. Just image this.
Using a computer not more than 10kg of weight, you can make a world-simulator with millions tons of mass & planet inside it. It's just a code essentially.
In essence :
We exist within what may be a naturally occurring simulator, born from a black hole that generated the fundamental forces and laws of nature just like a code in a computer.
Just thinking that there might be other universe inside or other black hole is just mind blowing
Just image this, using a computer not more than 10kg of weight, you can make world-simulator with millions tons of mass inside it. It's just a code.
In essence :
We exist within what may be a naturally occurring simulator, born from a black hole that generated the fundamental forces and laws of nature.
This is a result of sin. Repent and believe the good news of Jesus Christ for eternal life.
The good news of Jesus Christ:
I Corinthians 15:3-4 NKJV
[3] For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, [4] and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures,
I agree, perhaps (if we are in black hole) perhaps that black hole is in s bigger universe with even more black holes and they have also found they are in one as well. Would there be limitless different universes ? Likewise all the black holes we see, do they then form another universe ?
You will never know till you enter, yet you will face fate worse than death, eternity of suffering without time and space
@@damiandamiano3651yes, but it is irrelevant while just “thinking” about it
I could listen to Neil talk about anything at this point.
I often do
Yeah, he could read the phone book, or his shopping list as far as I'm concerned
An intelligent sentient animal that lives in the deep ocean that never breaks the surface thinks the entire universe is filled with water and nothing else, and it probably thinks it is the center of the universe.
You aren't describing intelligence. You are describing ignorance.
Currently living in or passed through a black hole. I also find it interesting that there would then be smaller black holes within a universe sized black hole.
our universe has billions of blackholes of various sizes.
yet, the universe within those blackholes are the same universe.
why would that be?
and we are potentially in a black hole within a black hole within a black hole...
@@stuartcarlton5002I guess at that point anything is possible, infinite black hole regress.
Cannot believe you guys plugged skinwalker ranch. Take some scientific pride
Hey it's the outer wilds guy!
Neil's just another tech bro, like Elon Musk and all these other fools. He took that mask off long ago when he showed his MAGA hat.
To be scientific is to be open minded, if you can’t prove something is real then can you prove that it’s not real definitively?
@@64CSARnah! It's all about money. It's called advertising. Skinwalker ranch has the same scientific base as Ancient aliens
I didn’t realize it was considered unscientific. Is there any good debunking videos? I find it entertaining but I didn’t realize it had hate
@StarTalk
I thought the assumption was that if you fell into a black hole, you would be ripped apart. That would imply that anything in the black hole is no longer in the form it was in prior to crossing the event horizon. So if we are in a black hole, that implies that prior to crossing the event horizon, "something was ripped apart", and the "pieces" of that thing eventually coalesced into whatever makes up our universe, perhaps billions of years after crossing that event horizon. And since we've observed black holes, that further implies that there are black holes inside of black holes since we wouldn't be able to see black holes that are outside the event horizon if we are inside. Oh man, my head hurts.
It is black holes all the way down!!!
Yes friend
Yeah this is the problem I have with it.
Even if I accept the imputation that a black hole is the boundary to another universe, to 'enter' that universe you first must be reduced to subatomic particulates, half of which will never enter and just be flung away.
And then 14 billion years later you get to maybe be some type of life form again? Bit of a stretch.
And I would add that the gravity of the wormhole would be so great as to stop any rotation of matter. Either that, or it's not equal on all sides of the wormhole, which would cause a possible rotation on it's own, which would make all universes on the other side all spinning in the same direction, which we cannot know. (Yet.)
It wasn't a big bang it was a ripping as we went into the black hole.
I always thought the most reasonable explanation for the big bang was us coming out of a black hole.
I agree. Have been thinking the same thing for ages. We don't yet have the hard evidence only revelation. As Einstein opined, imagination is more powerful than information.
I believe it was nothingness that became something, or matter. And, someday, there will be a "reverse" big bang where somethingness becomes nothing. And it's just goes in and out.
@@bulletproofair like a weird sort of cosmic heartbeat.
I have the same reasoning than you.
That's a good point
FINALLY THIS BECAME A TOPIC!
i was kept saying that theory to my friends and everyone was like " daaamn "
Same dude. I've kept saying a super massive black hole swallowed matter in another dimension and collapsed on itself and brought the big bang to our universe and birthed it. After billions of years of evolution, we're here today.
Quit bogarting!
Puff Puff Pass bruh.
Literally the plot of Starfield too lol
Hypothesis*
@@johnsimpson7607 I have never played or will play starcraft, i can assure you that wasnt been my hidden motives, to talk about a game.
I’ve spent years chasing answers in documentaries, podcasts, even ancient texts-and none of it hit me the way The Obscured Principles book by Dorian Caine did. It’s like it was written for the few who are ready to break the illusion and remember who they really are.
It just hit at the right time. Made me rethink a lot, honestly.
Damn… now I really need to read it.
I love this book.
Do it. You won’t regret it.
Fr? How did it change things for you?
😊 Thanks, thumbs up, have a great day.
I’ve seen a video about this before never thought you would make one
It was made by kwazkazart
2:24 This is what happened in 2016
I don't see any lies here
That's definitely possible.
All I know is that something changed and I don't like it. I want my previous life back! I mean, my previous life sucked, but our world/society was different and better in so many ways. I can't stand this current reality.
How long do you guys think it'll be until something like this happens again? I sure hope our next reality is better than this one!
Every day, we hear a new shallow theory attempting to explain the universe and to escape the undeniable truth of the existence of a Great Creator - vast in knowledge, wisdom, and power - worthy of glorification and worship.
"And of His signs is the creation of the heavens and the earth and what He has dispersed throughout them of creatures. And He, for gathering them when He wills, is competent."
(Surah Ash-Shura, 42:29)
i think 2012 but we didn’t feel it until 2016
@@kash5797isn’t your theory just as shallow?
I remember hearing when I was younger (and this might be wrong, so feel free to correct me on this) that our universe was constantly expanding, with the prevailing theory that it was due to momentum from the big bang, but with this new theory in mind, what if the reason it's expanding is because more matter is continually being sucked in, therefore making the black hole we inhabit larger, and so it's internal edges should expand as well? At least that's the way I understand it based on the linear graph shown near the start
That's what I've been thinking as well. It could very well explain the expansion of the universe.
Or conversely, As the Parent Black Hole's event horizon shrinks due to Hawking Radiation, Inversely the Spacetime "inside" expands, since the mathmatical properties of spacetime inside a black hole's Event Horizon are inversed, 3D Space becomes 3D Time and 1D Time becomes 1D Space, and a hypothetical White Hole made from the formation of this black hole would have it's Time run in reverse to the PBH (Parent Black Hole).
I Hypothesize that our universe Is that hypothetical White Hole
From this, A correlation can be made between the Exponential increase in Hawking radiation as the Horizon's Surface Area (it's Space) Decreases Vs The Exponential Accelleration of SpaceTime as Time Increases.
Though your idea about Matter being sucked into the Parent Black Hole influencing the universe inside also has weight in this hypothetical, as there was a period in our universe's timeline where there was a massive Deaccelleration of Spacetime (relative to the Inflation Era) just after the first fundamental particles started forming, (currently explained by Gravity), however this could be also explained as the increase in surface area of the event horison increasing as the rate at which it gobbles up all of the matter available to it outpaces the rate at which Hawking Radiation can evaporate that energy away, and then by the time our universe is 8.8 Billion years old, The PBH can no longer eat more than it evaporates, and thus the age of Accelleration begins!
One Major contender for a black hole that fits the description of something that Feasts for so long is actually the black holes that become our Super Massive Black Holes at the centre of our galaxies, As they have been able to feed for the longest.
The Hubble Tension is a sore spot for this hypothetical, because we're still unsure Why the CMB is at odds with our current measurements, However If future scientists discover that the Cosmological Constant has increased from what we calculate now, it could give us insight as to what mechanics are at play with the expansion of the universe, and possibly confirm hypotheses we are commenting on this very video!
When Neil passes away it will be a really sad day. Made me love learning about space. So interesting
In other words, Obito’s Mangekyo is accurate
I remember reading about the black hole/universe density theory back in the 1980s.
Thanks for all the amazing videos and epic content!
I love this format!
Honestly, what would you do without Neil? Dude blows your mind weekly like it’s nothin 👏
If our universe is a black hole, and our universe contains black holes also, then cosmos is just the biggest Matryoshka toy containing all other universes contained within, which possibly solves every known and unknown problem of Quantum Gravity.
It doesnt solve any of those problems. Why talk and make claims about things u dont understand
@@Dinofx_jr freedom?
@@AaronJustice weaponized incompetence, Nice.
It's black holes all the way down!
@@Dinofx_jr That tiny rectangular mustache above your lip seems to be making it hard for you to NOT attack people for kindly having an opinion.
Fascinating... where would we be as a society without those who make others afraid to share their thoughts?
This guy is really good at explaining really complex stuff beyond my ability.
I assure you it's beyond Tyson's ability. Tyson's understanding of science could be jotted down on the back of a stamp with room left for his name and address.
He's a con man and a gatekeeper. Not to be trusted.
It’s like that Pirates of the Caribbean movie “You best start believing in ghost stories, Miss Turner... you’re in one” but with black holes…you’re in one.
sir this is a wendy's and you owe 1250
Damn this prices are astronomical
Glad to see people at even Wendy's watch this show.
Damn, that’s crazy lmao.
Tired and old joke. It fits better with boomers complaining about millennials and gen-z.
Wendy's nuts hit your chin *knee slap*
4:40 Hi Niel! Actually, the angular velocity does not scale as inversely proportional to the radius, but rather to its square. You mention mv^2/r, but that is the centripetal force which isn't the relevant quantity here.
The angular momentum for a point mass is mvr, which is mωr^2 where ω=dθ/dt. Therefore, conservation of angular momentum increases the rotational speed by the inverse square of the radius, i.e. 1/2 the radius rotates 4 times as fast.
Nice catch! Thanks for making me recount my physics studies, lol
This needs more likes. Thr v^2/r bugged me
Translation: NEIL, YOUR FIRED. CLEAR OUT YOUR DESK. DR WILSON IS REPLACING YOU😂
@@MikePimanno the original comment is right, L=I * omega and for L to be conserved I have I=mr^2 for point masses and so if I decrease the radius from 1 to 1/2 then r^2=1/4 and then for L to be conserved omega (angular velocity) must quadruple. Even for extended objects the moment of inertia is proportional to mr^2 so it holds still. Mv^2/r is indeed centripetal force and you can check because it has units of force.
@warrenwilson He did say it's proportional though 👌
We're trapped in yonder subdivision manipulated by vivarium 😂😂
It really is crazy how I was questioning this very thing in my head yesterday, and this video pops up. Thank you sir. 🙂
6:28 - What if the Big Bang wasn't statistically even? In some directions, there could've been more mass, in others, more... Time? Or dark matter. If that explosion wasn't a ball, but was something misshapen, there could've been some starting rotation.
Big Bang didn't exactly have a size. Since there was no space to begin with, the "location" of the big bang was "everywhere". Which means in the end it has no single location, so no third dimensional exposion from a single point.
Where did the matter and energy for 'Big Bang' come from?
@@marcokitewe still don’t know
Everything just appeared at once, like you would through ingredients for a pizza on the table and then you put more, bake it and then give it some shape
@@stefanfyhn4668which came first, the chicken or the egg? That's the dilemma between the "Big Bang" and "Big Crunch" theories. We don't know which is correct.
I love the voice activated plasma ball.
I am glad I am not the only one who thought of this.
So funny thing is that I've been saying this for the past 3 YEARS ever since I learned that black holes cause time dilation. And then I had thought what if the time we are feeling is sped up because we are in a black hole. Then I started thinking if several other things were black holes, like the great attractor or the supermassive void. I've have been saying this for years and seriously the second that I saw an article online about it I felt a sense of I knew it.
Or the great attractor could the the singularity
My favourite "theory" (I have been informed it's Lee Smolin's theory), for lack of a better word, on the subject is that all black holes are seeds for other universes with slightly different "dna" than their parent universe, meaning slightly different constants in their laws of physics.
Of course it's very universe-centric to see things this way, as if the cosmos mirrors the cycle of life we observe in our universe, but I guess that's why it's so poetic.
I can honestly say that’s an interesting idea and I’ve honestly never heard of anything close to that. But I wonder what came first the universe or the black hole?🤔
Searching for positive results..
Pure as a mother's desire.
Neal heart early 90s
Peart
not really.
even though there are quintillions of blackholes in our universe,
the universe inside all those blackholes are one and the same, not individual separate universes.
sound weird, but it's true. think about this, what happens when 2 blackholes merge?
I appreciate this wording. "Confirmed for falsified" rather than denied 6:53
He says confirmed OR falsified.
Excuse the typo. The message still stands. @@BLAMMOBA
I'm 43, this stuff still blows my mind and gets me excited.
It does make a difference to understand the angular momentum in a new angle for a roboticist. Many thanks!
6:08 Don't forget charge, Dr. T.
Charge deez nuts
Whenever i think about our space, all my problems suddenly seems insignificant.
Those problems are still there though 😞
@of7551 Can't deny 😭🥲
@of7551 well yes, you are human after all
Thank you for talking on this
My favorite tidbit about black hole cosmology - is that white holes do exist, but they are temporal to those inside a black hole: they're an event in the past that exerts so much temporal force that it's nearly impossible to travel towards it (as it would require traveling backwards in time)
*If we do live in a black hole, is it safe to say that black holes are nature's own little natural spaceships?*
not really.
for all the blackholes in our universe, the universe inside those blackholes are one and the same universe, not separate universes.
why do you think that is true?
those are the other dimensions which scientist are able to prove that exists
If this is true, then what's inside the black hole in the black hole in the black hole we are living in?
And what's outside the black hole of the black hole of our black hole universe? That make the scale of the universe even more terrifying.
This title/theory broke my brain for a minute before clicking on the video where I was imagining other universes inside known black holes in our own observable universe. The possibilities are simultaneously mind-bendingly awesome and kind of depressing to think about. What if intelligent life does exist in other worlds inside other black holes, but we're destined to never meet or interact due to how the universe works? Also, what does this theory mean for dark matter? Could be a key to figuring that out! Very interesting stuff.
Brilliant breakdown as usual .
We’re in the big squirrel baby!!!
The best thing about science, is you can ask some of the most obscene thoughts, yet still take what you can observe at full face value, while HOPEFULLY learning from it somehow, if not, adjust a minor detail and try again.
This is a result of sin. Repent and believe the good news of Jesus Christ for eternal life.
I Corinthians 15:3-4 NKJV
[3] For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, [4] and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures,
I've suspected for quite awhile that we may be inside an evaporating black hole, with the big bang being the singularity falling apart and spreading outward.
Never heard of black hole evaporation, probably because it's nonsensical.
@@atlasfeynman1039 Never heard of Stephen Hawking? ,^)
If the Hawking radiation that he hypothesized exists, then black holes may be "evaporating".
@@atlasfeynman1039 Many theoretical physicists think black holes evaporate over time due to Hawking radiation. This concept isn't nonsensical just because you personally haven't heard of it.
I think almost all of us go through a phase of strongly suspecting this, feel like it usually passes by the time we finish kindergarten though.
@@atlasfeynman1039It’s not exactly a new concept.
So couldn't that mean the roughly 40 quintillion black hole in the observable universe are all their own universes themselves that were born out of our own black hole universe? That could mean we've got a super web of universes where each black hole could have their own 40 quintillion black holes at their own scale, all with universes of their own? Infinity goes in both directions, from the infinitely large to the infinitely small, so there's some room to work with.
That's just a theory....
Makes total sense, so the idea that nothing survives getting sucked into a black hole can nut very true then
Yup that’s my Truth.
It sure seems if this were the case the main material used to make a universe would have to be the imploded then regurgitated remains of a super massive star. (That is what makes black holes in this universe) So would there be enough of anything to make a whole universe off of one star plus anything it could find to eat close to it? It seems these would be countless little bitty new universes if that is what's happening. Whatever we would be made from would be unbelievably huge by human scales.
our universe has quintillions of blackholes, but all those universes inside them are one and the same universe.
why?
when two blackholes merge, the inside universe experience no change.
why?
Awesome video Dr Tyson!