2017 Cadillac CTS-V 640 hp Road and Track Review - Road America
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 сен 2024
- You don't have to be a professional driver to drive real fast and have a blast at a race track. You just need a car like the third generation 2016 Cadillac CTS-V. Oh, and it doesn't hurt when the race track is Road America. NOTE - During the track portion, you'll notice that the middle console lid opens and closes. This is because the track had a 2 way radio system plugged into the middle and it had a fairly thick cable that had to come out. I tried to close it a few times but didn't want to force it and risk damaging their cable.
This is the golden age of performance. 640 hp Caddies!!! 30k mustangs with 400+hp. Six or seven year old 100k+ cars with over 500hp for under 30k. Amazing
You got that right!
Probably the best car Cadillac has released in the past 25 years.
I LOVE American cars. They're so bloody gorgeous.
he gives a good review and is not annoying. good job
Thanks
This is what happens when Cadillacs and Vettes have babies.
I had the chance to drive the 2016 CTS-V (and ATS-V) at the Cadillac Vseries Lab at the Circuit of the Americas in Austin, TX last week. Prior to the test, I was pretty dead set that this car was no where close to any of the 4 M series BMW's I have owned in the past...how could it even compare to German crafted engineering, right? Well, all I can say, is that I after a full day at the track, I am a changed (and very happy) man. My next car WILL be a CTS-V, no question.
Auf Wiedersehen BMW.
I've never driven the ATS-V. How does it compare with any of the Ms and to the CTS-V?
So, did you buy one? How's it going?
I own both a BMW and a Cadillac and as much as I love both cars, the Cadillac is an unacceptably amazing car, its grip, stability, power and most importantly the vibe that the Cadillac gives is one that I personally believe is very hard to out perform, Cadillac is simply a Superb car !
And it's American!!! Nice job GM...
Soooooo, its a luxury 4door corvette?
***** but you are wrong, and m4 is already a luxury car and the m3 is the 4 door version. also the m3/4 do not share the powertrain of the m5.
sjpro1 You're both wrong. M3 is the 4 door version of the M4, the M5 is the 4 door version of the M6.
Amado Chalhoub No the 4 is the two door version of the 3 and the 6 is the two door version of the 5
Bryson Shires minus the leaf springs
***** Almost right.
2 series (Compact coupe)
3 series (Compact Executive sedan)
4 series (Compact Executive coupe)
5 Series (Mid-sized Sedan)
6 series (4-door Executive Coupé)
6 series Coupé (Grand Tourer)
7 series (Full-sized luxury sedan)
X1 (CUV)
X3 (Compact Luxury Crossover)
X5 (Mid-sized SUV)
X6 (Mid-Sized Crossover)
I really like your reviews. They are brilliant. Thank you for making them.
white is a great color for this car. That with the taste of the carbon fiber, i am impressed
I'm glad you have finally gotten the attention your reviews have long deserved. Well done
Thank you for the support.
The only Cadillac I would buy, and the first Caddy to ever catch my eye.
Well done!
Hands down the greatest vehicle Cadillac has ever built period!! Ok maybe except for the Cien & the Sixteen but they never made production but still sexy vehicles none the less!! Interior looks so classy without being obnoxious! That hidden secret motorized compartment was my favorite features!!!
Cadillac is one of the few companies in the world who have managed to completely rejuvenate their line of cars and improve the quality and performance of every generation of their new line of cars. At this point i want a car that doesn't look like every other car and Cadillac stands out uniquely like a UFO
Holy cow you did say 640 horsepower? I want one! this is stunning.
Yeah Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham days are over.
Cadillac is back baby
That engine sounds like it's not taking any prisoners. This car trumps the foreign competition. Good job G.M. !!!
Good review. Don't be so critical of yourself, alot of people like your videos. You manage to give some feeling to the driving ,good job. Liked and Subscribed.
7:10 dude you got a ghost trying to steal your shit sitting in your car!
I love what Cadillac is doing these days. :)
New subscriber here. No, you are not a race driver lol. But that is fine, this was a very thorough review. Great car, no doubt about it. I don't know what it is going to take to get snobs to consider Cadillac over BMW or Mercedes, this car is proof GM has done all they can for that. It is way over my price range, but for sure if I won the lottery tomorrow this is the first four door on my list. Good looking, world-class performance and refinement, and American. What more could anyone want?
Also, kudos to GM for eschewing carbon brakes. Sure, that helps on resale for a BMW or Mercedes, but there is no real-world advantage in performance and if you are a long term owner you don't want to pay to replace those.
Doug Harlow I have no doubt that ceramics would be better but on this car, most likely overkill. We were doing 3 hot laps at a time and the car might have a 5 min break while switching drivers and the brakes were doing fine. Who knows what would happen in a 20+ lap race but the reality is, who's going to race this car. It'll see the golf course with a bunch of your buddies and the trunk full of clubs before seeing a race track. That being said, I hope everyone that buys one take it to the track at least once to see what the cars capable of.
I've seen Porsches get some type of debris in between the ceramic rotor and brake bad and just destroy them. You don't need ceramics for a street car hell stop tech still sells steel rotors.
Ceramics are noisy Imop when not hot.
Guess what I am saying somethings are over kill and not needed for a street car.
I'll say it as well: Good reviews and not with any annoying behaviour or comments. Thank you.
Thanks you
saw this car at work absolutely stunning with the hugest rotors I've ever seen in our parking lot.
...very comprehensive and helpful review. You are informatively, hilariously, devilishly on point! I just subscribed!
Nice review and I love how the console kept opening and closing from the lateral forces.
Great review. I like that you don't pretend to be an automotive expert. My favourite car was the CTS-V wagon, but after watching the reviews on the '16 V, I have a new favourite :)
First reviewer to know the hood was carbon fiber. Thank you for an informed review.
Glad you explained that... I was going to say that it reminded me of when the Cadillac Seville was being compared to a Mercedes sedan, and within minutes of being driven over the same road as the Merc, the Caddy's mirrors fell off. Oooops. I own an XLR and wouldn't sell it for anything. But, Cadillac has finally created a four door Vette, and it would be a nice addition. I like your reviews. You are not overly obnoxious and self indulgent. Or Russian. Good job.
Wow, this car looks amazing.
I have an old 2011 CTS-V. it only has 556 HP 550 Torque. but it's so fun. I almost bought a 2016 V3 CTS-V but just could not justify the price vs performance gain. For now I'll stay with my V2. I do love all of the new options in the V3. If I had money to throw at cars I'd get a CT5-V Blackwing. Haha. Enough of my ramblings. Thanks for the video...I want one.
I rather get the CTS-V than the Blackwing..dont get me wrong it's a beast and it has a manual lol..but this v3 model looks better than the CT5-V it's smaller for a comparison to the m3 competition..interior up to date..but a cheap out than the v3 model..I love the v3 model when u pull up behind a hellkitty or a scat pack..that front facia that monstrous look in their their rearview means business with bone stock..but u can modded up 850-1100 hp lol..Blackwing ♥️ love it..but v3 model I rather have in my opinion.
Beautiful, both the CTS-V and ATS-V have nearly perfect proportions. It's to bad there is no longer a CTS-V Coupe! BoooWhooo!
Im not a big fan of modern American cars, but i have to say... This is a damn nice car!! Also the new CT6 looks damn nice! Nowadays, I see more often nice and good American rides.. keep them coming! THUMBS UP! 👍
I like all the new features of the CTS-V 640 . I certainly would like to have one!!
It looks beautiful in white. Great review.
White was the only colour left when I got there but kinda glad I got it. I think it looks good as well. Thanks
You are welcome.
Everyday Reviews Was that the special Matte White small production color? Great review.
Best review right now for the cts-v...well done dude!!
Thanks. Glad you enjoyed it.
Outstanding review ! This new CTS V is a game changer for Cadillac, a true "Super Sports Sedan". Cadillac should make a two door Coupe, ala Elmirage. I'm anxious to see how BMW, Mercedes, and Audi are going to counter!
I like the improved CUE. People forget that it can be operated via voice recognition. Plus, the new CT6 has a newer model with real buttons. It is only going to get better!
Great shades you were wearing... may I ask the brand?
Funny how I see many comparing this to an S Class when it is clearly a E Class competitor. I have a 2009 SL550 and yes the interior is beautiful the power is very good and the shape (the last year it did not look like melted plastic) is to die for. I would love to have this big bad Cadillac in black. Beautiful car!!!
Man. My dream car for sure. 2016 CTS V SEDAN > CTS V WAGON > ESCALADE. Hope my stocks perform well in Sept so that I can cash out and buy one. Worth this price.
That CTS-V ain't no joke! Gotta get one and a C7 Z06
Thorough, well presented... actually one of the best CTS-V reviews off the launch at Road America (and that's including the ones from the established outfits). Great work Brian. Been telling everyone about your channel lately!
Wow. Thanks.
hey don't worry about it man great review and cadillac is getting better and better!
Cadillac Is FINALLY GETTING IT RIGHT !! w/ The Latest Product Releases,
Their Really Stepping Up Their Game. The New Escalade , ATS & Now This Beast,
Putting Out These Numbers..The CTS-V Should Definitely Turn Some Heads In Traffic.
Looks Like Cadillac's Got That Swagger Back !!
such a good looking car. I love it. to rich for my blood though. maybe in a few years on the used market
This auto is a "tour de force!" Thanks for the excellent review!
Very nice review! enjoyed it!
Center console doubles as a rev counter, Sick.
Good reviewer!
Mmmmm Elkhart lake what a track. The reason David Hobbs opened his dealerships in Wisconsin. He ran laps of the gods here back in the day
American power sedans owning the market now.
4 door C7z06... Yes GM stick it to em from every corner
What are you talking about American cars can make turns ? Just waiting for euro fan boys to come on here and say that. Yes you ass holes USA fucked up the ring !!! Went to your back yard and because of USA the ring doesn't want manufactures seeking lap times. Cry baby Germans
robfrmny21 lol wut
just put em in the BUCK!
+skillz1855 Your a idiot, the CTSV has been around forever.... The previous model had 550hp..
Caddy and Chevrolet may be owned by GM, but there both ran differeantly... You dumb shit.
+Hassy Ali lol it shares the same engineering..LT4 small block V8 same interchangeable instrument cluster.transmission is nearly identically....so who's the idiotic
New M5 and new E63 are being tested as we speak. It's all about to get real
The new bimmers are straight GARBAGE, engine failure at 40k,, the intake and turbo setup is ass backwards producing 2x the heat the V8 should, everything is literally being cooked to death,, just look at the resale value,,
skillz1855 Yeah they fudged up so hard with the N63 and S63. From drinking a quart of oil between oil changes, spitting out blue smoke from the tailpipe due to bad CCVs and consumption, timing chain problems, fuel injector problems and carbon buildup problems that supposedly "efficient" engine turned out to be a huge mistake. Shit, I'm quite biased towards German cars but this Caddy and the previous generation CTS V is downright amazing and most importantly it will be reliable. Big old school V8s can take anything thrown at them.
skills1855 the E63 amg and the M5 F10 have both around 560~hp and are faster or as fast than this CTS-V with 640hp. This one cost about 92 000 a little bit of a bargain.
+skillz1855 you have no idea what your talking about brother
bob roger but the e63 can't do a burnout.
As a current owner of two AMG cars, I will look at the Caddy when I get ready to trade one in. Kudos to Caddy....car looks way better than the last rendition......and its NOT a BMW......
I like your review style sir, keep up the good work!
Good job on the track!
Stunning and Luxurious, just WoW! 👍
The aforementioned applicable GM engineers performed their due diligence with precision, which will supersede their competitors.
I have always been a AMG guy and didn't see any american car that would take me away from that but when you consider the price and the performance build quality looks and everything els i honestly think i would go for this new Caddy CTS-V over my beloved Benz's (I am American)
IM sorry but the former gen CTS-V wagon in Diamond Black still is the most badass ride ever around.
+A Jovial RUclips commenter can't beat the ferrari beating wagon. Love that thing. If they make thisa in a wagon it would be amazing
I'd give a $1000.00 to do what you did that day, your a lucky guy man. Congrats.
They should have included that instrument led screen in the ATS V as well
I agree, I have no idea why Cadillac didn't do that.
JDLARSON11 I haven't been in the ATS-V but have to admit, the CTS-V screen is really nice.
JDLARSON11 Apparently, the 16 ATS V and on will get an updated instrument gauge package with better graphics, fonts, bezels and such. I'm not sure if it's the same led screen as in the CTS V, but at least it seems that Cadillac is listening to feedback.
JDLARSON11 Yes Sir!
JDLARSON11 you think this car is worth the money?
One beautiful American car!
Looks sick... it's got a bit of a Nissan GTR face going there & there's nothing wrong with that!
Not to mention all that power
Anything with a "63" after it or an "M" before it, better watch out!
+C Howard 65?
www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1311_2015_mercedes_benz_s65_amg_first_look/
even the S65 is a tad short...lol. 621 bhp vs 640 for the Cadillac.
S65 $229,000 Cadillac CTS V $80,000. The Mercedes is more luxurious but is it $149,000 MORE luxurious?
+C Howard Cadillac has slightly more hp but the Mercedes is still faster ^^
One clear downside: Keeping that darn console door closed.
In the defence of the Cadillac, I had a large cable coming out of the middle console and I couldn’t really pull over and close it properly. 😊
I'm buying this car in like 20 years when they've turned into the old cars
Ohh man Cadillac please offer AWD versions for us Canadians!
Well....I mean, they make an AWD.....it's for anyone in the world who can afford shipping ;-)
Robert Mantell No cts-v ever came with awd.
Not a V, nope, but it does come in AWD ;-)
Robert Mantell There have been zero awd cts-v ever produced. The cts-v has always been a front engine rwd car, and never awd.
+Backdoor Bubba Brown
Dear Know It All.....go do an I internet search for ATS-V. I am accepting apologies via email lol.......
For our pal in Canada - yep, and it makes 464hp starting at 60k USD
Oh my god ! this "CTS-V" is really incroyable and so beautiful #CadillacImYourBiggestFan🇺🇸
Has this reviewer ever been in the previous versions, new 6.2 liter engine? first rate interior fit and finish? I am warming to it even though it's more of a rehash of the previous versions. Driving the previous could be a handful to drive it never inspired confidence to go faster, I did anyway but it was alway's at the seat of my pants and I walk the streets of the South Bronx and Bed Sty do or die. I plan to test drive one all the same and am hoping there's a price adjustment so that it's not so close to its German counterparts. I had some Corsa's put on my V and that sounded awesome. Fuel economy, improved, zero to sixty improved, just barely on both and not for nothing the ATS-V seems to be more car for the money. He's doesn't feel comfortable driving it as fast as he can, I wonder why? The brakes are good but the regular seats are just comfy and I wonder if the new ones will creak and squeak like mine did right off the dealer lot. On the track the Michelins are useless after two hot laps and some of the options mentioned were on the Beemer and Benz back in 2010. I'm wondering if the V really can stick it to the Dodge Hell Cat? I do like the computer game graphics in the console. Its not very light and fluffy on the road, its a hard ride and there's very little difference between the drive modes. It didn't inspire courage when I was driving it and it turns out my passengers who've driven with me in many many powerful cars didn't feel to comfortable either I found out later. It was hard to get the car past one hundred and fifty on even the coolest day for some reason the car would bleed speed past one twenty. One Hundred Grand for a Caddy? I'm still on the fence with this one, should I splurge and get the CTS-V or opt for the smaller less powerful but very little difference in the numbers performance wise and get the ATS-V which I'm much more impressed with. I don't want to come off like I'm knocking the CTS-V, I'm just very disappointed there isn't much difference between the one I had and this one not to mention where's the latest innovations, its the same engine just with more BHP, it's not turbo charged, there isn't all wheel drive available and it looks a lot like the old gen with little changes especially the interior. I wanted the this version to be fantastic, inside and out dripping with technology thats practical, I do like the camera's that can record your deviltry but that may get you into trouble if you get into an accident. I've been a Caddy man since the eighties I was one of those young guy's driving his dads car, it all started with the STS, now back then that was a game changer, what a car. I have a couple of years before I decide what I'm going to do when it comes to my next ride so hopefully I'l have a change of heart, wow, a 100 grand for a Caddy, who'd have know. C'mon Cadillac, wow me, theres time and not for nothing the few fella's I know who have the last gen V aren't to impressed with the new one either and its along the same lines Im not. If I still had my V I'd be hard pressed to swap it out for the new one with not even one second quicker to sixty and where am I going to get to get the car to two hundred MPH? anyway you haven't lost me completely.....yet.
As I've said before, I'll repeat here. The Corvette Z06 and CTS-V were a split investment/partnership. Z06 got an upgraded interior, but got an undersized supercharger in exchange. The LT4 needed to fit under the Cadillac hoodline with the strut brace. This forced engineers to use a smaller displacement blower on the Z06, thus watering that car down for the sake of CTS-V. In addition, this 8spd was a transmission that belongs in every car but a Corvette really. I think they made it as stout as possible, but overall the LT4/8spd is a Cadillac CTS-V drivetrain, far more than it is a Z06. The label Z06 stood for track capable, stiffest chassis...it dates back to the secret RPO by Zora Duntov to put out a race ready Corvette in the 60's. The Z06 is a great car overall, but this compromise with the CTS-V...well...it's a compromise.
RC000E Yes, at 650/650 the Z06 is SO watered down, what with only running 10.4@132 and all, and beating nearly every production car on every track. The Z06 IS track capable, and it DOES have the stiffest chassis. I really don't know what you're bitching about.
Well Vernon Price, for many reasons actually. A: I am the current owner of a Z06, and owner of 6 Corvettes over the past 8 yrs. I have road raced for over a decade, so your 1/4 mile validation really doesnt translate to users of the car for track use. Running a car 10 seconds at wide opened throttle versus for 20+ minutes at wide opened throttle requires different levels of excellence. I was at a private premier in Detroit for the C7 Z06, with various engineers and the head of marketing Harlen Charles (email address please, if youd like pictures and validation), so I am not AGAINST this Z06/CTS-V. I am against the use of the RPO Z06 to supplement and share costs with this Cadillac platform. This was formerly a duty of the RPO ZR1. Z06 was always a more track dedicated RPO, lighter, created more for a specific demographic. Frankly, my overall explanation would easily explain my position, which is valid, but is far beyond the scope of this small text back and forth venue. The C7Z is a great car, but they shouldve branded this the ZR1 then released another variation as Z06...thats my complaint. Instead, they will likely release a next level car that may carry zr1 branding...but essentially the pure track slut z06 is gone
RC000E You misunderstand. I brought up the straight line numbers because you said it was "watered down". Which is obviously complete and total bullshit.
And yes I picked up on the fact that you are one of those few hardcore Z06 zealots who believe the C5 and C6 Z06es are the only "true" Z06es, and a Z06 should never be supercharged, blah blah blah blah blah. You guys would find something wrong with a cure for cancer.
The simple fact is that the C7 Z06 is much faster around any track than any C6 Z06. That is an indisputable fact. You calling it "watered down" just makes you look ignorant in the face of the facts.
Vernon Price I may have missed where I disrespected you, but I suppose the internet is the gateway for people to talk to someone they don't know as if they are uneducated morons. On the contrary, I've been involved with the automotive industry my entire life and was the COO of a company that built turnkey trackday, mid engine cars. So, understand, my opinion is quite valid, both as an owner, enthusiast and as an industry professional. You have a right to disagree, but calling me ignorant or that I spew 'BS' is completely without basis.
Many people don't look at cars, or successor models in such simplistic terms. Take a 996 Porsche versus a 993 for example...one is far more valuable and desirable than the other. You can dispute why, but the fact is, increased refinement, raw numbers, etc...isn't always the factor which defines a vehicles success. Branding, marketing, and capitalizing long term is more important to the brand, than simply saying "its faster than the prior z06...done."
I appreciate the C7Z06 for many reasons. I also am factually aware that the budget for the development of C7 was restricted, so they needed to try to fill the brand as efficiently as possible. My ONLY dispute is the use of the RPO. I am the current party responsible for tracking all C7 Z06 track performance data (email if you want provided more data than you have time to read). Simply put, no one is saying the car isn't a performer...of course it is. All that the more "Z06 purists" feel, is that the car was created to fit too broad of a spectrum of users. It's trying to do too many things, so in that it SLIGHTLY missed the mark.
Compromises we see, are things like the decreased supercharger displacement volume. The likely cause of this was to reduce the overall height of the LT4, so that it could fit under a more cleanly designed CTS-V hood for this incoming generation. This is one of many compromises made to the Z06, to benefit a cadillac. In the end, I understand the financial dynamics...I've worked within operating budgets, I realize there are compromises. In the end though, the facts also support the fact that were excessive budgetary constraints not in existence, we could have felt less compromised. "Watered down" is a strong, and very negative term, but the fact is, there is an argument to be made.
Respectfully,
Damian
RC000E You said the C7 Z06 is "watered down". That MAKES you an uneducated moron. It's like you think my response to you came out of nowhere or something. No, it was proportional to the stupidity contained inside your post.
You can claim to not be ignorant all you want, but when the C7 Z06 so very clearly outperforms the C6 Z06 and you call it "watered down", that's when you get called an idiot. Watered down compared to what, exactly? Obviously not the C6 Z06.
Again, I get it. You are a hardcore C5/C6 Z06 enthusiast who believes a Z06 can only be NA, can never weigh more than 3200 lbs, can only be a dedicated track monster, can never even have the OPTION of an automatic because it "ruins the purity" and that kind of unmitigated bullshit etc. And you're wrong.
"decreased supercharger displacement volume. The likely cause of this was to reduce the overall height of the LT4, so that it could fit under a more cleanly designed CTS-V hood"
It was because of the height, but it was to fit under the Corvette's hood, not the CTS-V's hood. But there are other factors as well, such as MPG and avoiding the gas guzzler tax, not to mention better response from the s/c. You are blaming the CTS-V for the smaller supercharger, and you are wrong. They developed the LT4 for the Z06, not the CTS-V.
The CTS-V is a much larger package with more room for an engine, the Gen 2 CTS-V fit a larger S/C under the hood with no issues. The C7 is the car with the engine height constraints, not the CTS-V.
So no, these were not compromises made to benefit Cadillac. You are looking for a scapegoat, but you picked the wrong one. "Watered down" is also an entirely incorrect term to apply to the Z06, as the evidence clearly shows it's beating many cars all costing anywhere from a bit more to 10 times more money. What compromise are you making, exactly?
Right. You're not.
this car is based on the Holden Commodore HSV R8 and yes they come with a towbar for your boat or caravan or tandem car trailer....the R8 is 6 sp manual...they also still make the wagon..HSV R8 Tourer.
+Mxracer6y do your research....I'm rite
lol..Someone should research a bit before using all caps
bought mine in Nashville and drove it to Las Vegas, what a nice ride*** passing 4-8 cars with ease. 100mph feels slow and spanking CLK's Vette's M3's & Hell kitties is just pure entertainment.
13:01 nice view for next generation of headlights
Cadillac is just awesome!
It would be amazing if cadillac made a CTS-V Wagon
+HKM _ they do make one
Not off the 2016 CTSV base
+Sean Hamre yeah it was discontinued in 2014 :( so sad cause it's amazing
HKM _ they did...it just didn't sell
You got a like and a sub from me today, now I am on the prowl for a used second gen ctsv, as far as my research has gone recently, I got my eyes on the 2009... heard that the 2010 has issues with the transmission or some sort. I don't want to buy anything too new but any suggestions of which year to get that is not going to give me problems and have all the goodies the 2nd gen can offer!! And the price it will go for currently, I guess around 30k?
Good review and really Nice car. Wish they sold these in England
Really like the optional mischievous ghost who likes to swing open the console lid at his discretion, what happens if he turns malignant?
Great review. Gonna be a toss up between this and a hellcat loo
This is more like a pure Ad rather than a car review.
+Derek Dong Why?
Good review. This Cadillac is awesome!
Wow.. my next car at the end of 2018 if god willing
4 door Vette. (Actually better because Cadillac always started with a car that could beat the Vette but had to tone it down to not take away from the vettes buyers.) Both are amazing cars, but honestly I'd rather have this.
First rate review of a first rate car
630 lb of torque , put a tow bar on there it'd tow a boat just fine.
+Antifaith29 I was thinking that too, car could easily pull a boat, however I would not do it.
what sucks is is the suspension would screw up
It actually can tow a boat with that massive TQ lol ..
You're right. A trailer hitch on the back just wouldn't cut it though.
+3yar1983 I highly doubt it can tow anything. It's most likely too low to the ground and towing is hard on the frame.
@matthew von how do you know how it shifts if you ain't driven one? Don't be quick to judge till you experience it.
Great review. Dream car.
great review on the CTYS-V did you do one on the ATS-V yet?
REPLACING MY c6 z WITH THIS! awesome!
Really beautiful!
Pause at 1:08 and start drooling.
Are there any tracks in Western Canada where you can push your vehicle for some laps?>
+MrNutsack100 no. Not really.
8:38 console lid isn't closed :). good review awesome car :). Looks like someone already caught the lid... carry on lol :).
La mejor union entre lujo y deportividad :)
Center console lid keeps popping up while the guy is cornering. You can see it happening repeatedly. Quality control / fit & finish issues? D'oh!
+Trev0r98 Read the fucking video description.
No he Is not closing it because he has somthing inside preventing him from closing center console
+Trev0r98 read the description
ultra beautiful
Never made it to production (unfortunately) Cadillac made a 1,000 hp proto type V16 auto some years back.
Nice car but I would have to hit the lottery jackpot in order to buy it. So....I'll buy some tickets today because I want that car!
Got to ride in this during the summer cause my friends dad is pretty high up in cadillac and got a prototype we hit like 135 on the highway
this is a good looking car
but have you seen the ct6?sexy ass sedan!
Seen it? I got to drive it a couple of weeks ago. Watch for the review sometime this week.
+Everyday Reviews Looking forward to that! The car is so beautiful