Chord Dave and Soulnote have the best sounding of the bunch have little more emotions than other DACs. However for the value for the price T+A DAC 200 performed pretty well and close to other DAC as well.
Soulnote+clock seems to have best high extension and most balanced/accurate tonality? But all sounded great. T+A being the least expensive DAC (by a large margin) is amazingly keeping up well. Actually it seems to be one of the more dynamic (impactful) sounding DAC... just not quite as fully extended as the others. Would love to hear your personal takes on each DAC when listening in person.
Two cents: T&A 200 is the best match with ATC. Apart from the Weiss, the others are a bit thick/muddy in the lower mids. The T&A is clearly the most accurate in timbre and most dynamic and clear reverb (there is only a problem with iPhone clipping that makes T&A sound harsh on some tracks as iPhone adjusts audio gain on the fly and struggles with higher dynamic range). The Weiss sounded boring and the Soulnote and Lampi were a bit phasey but will appeal to those who want some colour/atmosphere/bigger soundstage. The T&A is rather a studio style sound (very revealing) and may cause bad recordings to be too revealing of recording limitations. On the whole, these are all really good DACs - no duds here!
Soulnote DAC was incredibly impressive. Virtually flawless in the areas of timbre, macro and microdynamics, realism of performance , musical insight and harmonic contrast. Track 4 underlines these qualities. Second best goes to the Lampizator, keeps up to the Soulmate but loses out in lack transient bloom/decay , lack of warm organic nature and seems dry and maybe even dull at times. The Chord is all about energy, drive and sparkle. T+A comes in next , in track 5 is outperforms the Soulmate and all else. A notable vocal presentation , nuanced and articulated so well. For the money so enjoyable and is there but not quite at the level of the others overall with the exception of the Weiss. Speaking of which , probably the least engaging and immersive of all the DACs.
I have been very interested on the T+A D-200 and I have a Baltic 4 and this is the first video comparing the T+A DAC200 vs a Lampi DAC, Do you believe I could be upgrading from the Baltic 4 to T+A DAC200 ?
Very good demo! They have their own brand signature as expected but I am surprised T+A has created such air/sound stage in your system. It really matches with your ATC. Subscribed!
Thank you for setting up such an incredible matchup of these high end DACs. I was directed to the T+A DAC 200 based on several superlative online reviews, and intending to purchase one, I really scrutinised the playback in comparison with the other DACs. I was already sold by the looks alone of the T+A. However, from what I heard, Soulnote was clearly my pick of the bunch, followed by Chord DAVE, Weiss and Lampizator which were all rather similar sounding. But even factoring the reduced fidelity of playback from RUclips, what really puzzled me was that the T+A struck me as thin, bright and grainy sounding compared to the others... or did I hear wrong!? It would be really helpful as a reference if you could give us your in person impressions of the DACs. Cheers!
Thank you. I came to watch this comparison again after watching Mike's PLAYBACK DESIGNS MPD-8 sound demo as to my ears, that's an end game dac. Glad to find the T+A gives you similar SQ (more air and more focus) as the Playback at 1/3 of the price. Might have to start saving for the T + A :)
soul note最好,音乐味道最好。 Soul Note is the best in this demo, but each dac has their own best practice way.Such DAC200 should use DSD mode,using upsample to dsd512 even dsd1024
Thank you for a very interesting review. Can you tell me which source was used by you ? Grimm and Lumin were noticeable on the rack (this is what I noticed)
Very good video , just I would suggest to have your subjective comments on each of them at the end of the video so viewers can compare with their own experience.
Hey, one more vote for english subs as your content and comparison is great. Also can you perform environment recording and upload it to be downloadable, this will make comparison better in our main systems. Thanks once again and keep it up!
Lampizator has the best Timbre by far. Just amazing. But it’s a bit too forward. Weiss is overall the best to my ears. T+A is very good and soulnote as well. DAVE is meh. Thin classic chord sound. Not my cup of tea
Problem with today's DACs is that they sound "digital" / technical hence music sounds "artificial", not like real music. Sometimes older DACs are better, for me for example one of best sounding DACs ever is still old Levinson 30.5 or 30.6 Reference DAC.
Chord Dave and Soulnote have the best sounding of the bunch have little more emotions than other DACs. However for the value for the price T+A DAC 200 performed pretty well and close to other DAC as well.
Lampizator Horizon is way better than the rest. The soundstage, depth, and realism are simply at another level.
ruclips.net/video/7BpOQ10PZSM/видео.html
The timbre is the best by far. Too forward sounding tho. The Weiss has the best depth. And all around most balanced. Imho
biggest disapoindment in Dave:) lampizator best, second soulnote sacd in my opinion.
只用電腦喇叭測試就可分辨音質不同, 感謝草爸精心錄音製作, 波蘭Lampizator Horizon DAC 特性介於其他四者之間, 英國Chord Dave 發出標準的英國厚聲, 日本Soulnote S-3 Ver.2發出細緻及軟的日本聲, 德國 T+A DAC200發出結構硬朗的德國聲, 瑞士Weiss DAC501 MK2發出快速及線條清晰的瑞士聲. 草爸安排的順序很好, 對比很清楚. 很用心的內容.
什么电脑喇叭,jbl nano k5以上级别?越好的器材只能越听出苹果的垃圾声有多烂而已,人家娱乐,你们靠这个比dac是不是有点lmao了
This is Amazing! Thank you for providing the most comprehensive HIFI DACs comparison I've ever seen on YT.
加了時鐘的Soulnote聲音,是最接近真實鋼琴的"正確"音色之外,其他的則沒有任何一台,是達到相同接近的水準,差距很明顯,由此可見得,最貴不一定聲音最好,但相對便宜機器的聲音,就是一聽馬上就會知道落差,至於DAVE除鋼琴音色"正確"性,明顯比Soulnote遜色之外,整體各方面都有很不錯的表現,排第二,其他機器的聲音表現,都不像屬於這兩台機器為同一層次表現的等級...。
听弦乐(01,02)则是lampizator最好,也比较全面平衡。听人声(04)也是lampizator最好听,而T+A也是很不错的,很舒服的声音。这套系统的声音真的很不错,甚少音染完全是监听标准,ATC SCM 100A的功劳不小啊
我最喜歡的是Lampizator,我對所有的廠牌和價格都不清礎,Horizon完勝,從音樂的連慣性,泛音,層次解晰都不一樣的等級
iPhone你当真?
我也最喜歡Lampizator,但看一看價錢,OMG,只能說有錢真幸福!
正在找一台进阶DAC,找到了这个视频,非常感谢草爸的精心制作,给了我很好的体验。在对比之后,我选择了T+A DAC 200,是考虑到性价比,如果不考虑价格因素,我会选择Lampizator Horizon. 再次感谢,祝2024新年快乐!
别了吧,用iPhone录音做参考十万和一百万根本听不出
收獲好大,非常欣賞這樣公平的測試,不同類型的音樂軟件,最喜歡就是你自己的波蘭DAD,高密度又有音樂感,音埸又大又貴氣,這牌子都是第一次聽到,原來好高質,其他牌子現場聽過。
價格全部不清楚,可否告之那部DAc最貴,多謝你公平公正的分享
那這樣的表現你覺得如何呢?
ruclips.net/video/7BpOQ10PZSM/видео.html
奇 怪 . . . . . .
這麼棒的 頻道 . . . . . 訂閱戶 只有一千多 . . . . . .
值得心慰的是 . . . . . .
留言區裡 有很多 知音 ( 玩家 )
討論 很 熱烈 . . . . . .
草爸 可說是 真正的 發燒友 . . . . . ! !
這麼多 Hi-End 器材
我還以為 草爸 是 開音響店的 哩 . . . . . .
用手機耳機聽了幾次後,突發奇想用Blu-ray 機YT app 放上自己音響系統聽! 最大感覺是除了Horizon 以外,其他的DAC 都有高音吵耳尖叫的感覺😅 我猜是Horizon 性格比較溫柔,樓主是整體配合Horizon 的,換成其他DAC就有高音太光輝的感覺
Soulnote+clock seems to have best high extension and most balanced/accurate tonality? But all sounded great. T+A being the least expensive DAC (by a large margin) is amazingly keeping up well. Actually it seems to be one of the more dynamic (impactful) sounding DAC... just not quite as fully extended as the others. Would love to hear your personal takes on each DAC when listening in person.
ruclips.net/video/7BpOQ10PZSM/видео.html
Two cents: T&A 200 is the best match with ATC. Apart from the Weiss, the others are a bit thick/muddy in the lower mids. The T&A is clearly the most accurate in timbre and most dynamic and clear reverb (there is only a problem with iPhone clipping that makes T&A sound harsh on some tracks as iPhone adjusts audio gain on the fly and struggles with higher dynamic range). The Weiss sounded boring and the Soulnote and Lampi were a bit phasey but will appeal to those who want some colour/atmosphere/bigger soundstage. The T&A is rather a studio style sound (very revealing) and may cause bad recordings to be too revealing of recording limitations. On the whole, these are all really good DACs - no duds here!
謝謝草爸的測試,雖然用耳機聽,還是頗有分別:
Horizon 華麗分析力非常好,只是我覺得欠了點自然感
Dave 高低頻的分析力都被比下去,亦雖敗猶榮
Weiss 自然而有分析力,我覺得(在此影片中)比Horizon 耐聽
T+A 這個很平衡自然呀,分析力也很好,我排它第二
Soulnote 華麗又自然,分析高,很喜歡呀!
大大聽力很好
那這樣的表現你覺得如何呢?
ruclips.net/video/7BpOQ10PZSM/видео.html
聽第一次
最喜歡日本Soulnote S-3 Ver.2 聲音特別浮凸,特別有立體感
DAVE 二次升頻特別好聽,音色有自己的特色,解析聽起來最好
其他有幾台聲音密度不失但又特別寬鬆有活生感,不過個人乍聽之下差異並不是很大的感覺
細聽第二次Lampizator聲音的質感是我唯一喜歡的點,也許被手機錄音扼殺掉了?(其實手機錄即可以很明顯聽出差異,感謝草爸
那這樣的表現你覺得如何呢?
ruclips.net/video/7BpOQ10PZSM/видео.html
soulnote的声音是最活泼的,格外突出。
除此之外,大部分的DAC的硬素质不会有太大的差距,更多的是个人听感上的喜好。DAC的差异,远没有扬声器上的差异大。
my personal ranking of the Dac
no 1. Soulnote 2. Weiss/T+A 3.Dave 4. Lampitazor
雖然只是用iphone錄但还是很有參考價值,聽得出chord的動態大音埸闊,低音也收得最干淨,Soul note也屬同一種表現,其他三款在已有的分晰力上比較講求有自己的音色,不過以DAC來講最好還是音色中正再用别的器材調味比較好,當然也要看自己巳有的器材去配搭。
毫无价值,iPhone严重扭曲,你只要换个数字解码耳放直出接个好点耳机就发现惨不忍听,觉得好听是你器材太渣
Soulnote DAC was incredibly impressive. Virtually flawless in the areas of timbre, macro and microdynamics, realism of performance , musical insight and harmonic contrast. Track 4 underlines these qualities. Second best goes to the Lampizator, keeps up to the Soulmate but loses out in lack transient bloom/decay , lack of warm organic nature and seems dry and maybe even dull at times. The Chord is all about energy, drive and sparkle. T+A comes in next , in track 5 is outperforms the Soulmate and all else. A notable vocal presentation , nuanced and articulated so well. For the money so enjoyable and is there but not quite at the level of the others overall with the exception of the Weiss. Speaking of which , probably the least engaging and immersive of all the DACs.
The T+A DAC 200 is my preference here. Good variety of music to test with as well.
Thank you for the compare and record, so nice that can heard the different dac.
I would love to hear DAVE with the MScaler in that company. I found the improvement quite amazing and even in this company, it was my favourite.
Dave could be way better with linear power supply modified
這肯定是全RUclips 測試最齊全的頻道了! 你想得到了, 這都給你聽了, 超佛心得! 必須給讚!
知道草爸是來自FB 家訪及介紹 原本以為草爸只有帥 會擺pose外 今天在youtobe看到這視頻 在自己的系統 聽 驚為天人 草爸不只帥 還是真實有料 視頻用心不說 透過草爸系統 錄音更是棒 解說時更是迷人 總之有料又帥的男人 讓我按下頻道訂閱的按鍵 視頻更是我收藏 調音的收選 感謝草爸的用心 草爸比在FB上永遠只有圖文介紹沒有真實錄音的推銷文強太多 感恩
Love every bit of it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!请多拍点这么赞的对比声音demo
Wow, really love and respect this seriously produced video 🥰 and I found one of the DACs sounds amazing to me. Appreciate it.
Which one?😊
Lampizator完全超越其他4部Dac 聲音 感情自然 諧波豐富, 力度與分析力都恰到好處, 像一個超級 黑膠, 毫無一絲數碼味, 其次T+A 雖然冇突出 但樣樣分數平均 再來到soulnote 的力感和分析力 是他的殺手鐧 但有点硬質減分不少,weiss501mk1 我曾經用過一個半月就放掉, 他的死穴就是聲音太軟調力度太弱, 今次mk2聽到是有力度提高不過亦是不足夠,chord 聲音太薄 這顯出解釋力高及 空間闊大 的假象 不過反適合肥厚濛的組合的救命草, 下次 希望 草爸 有機會 比較playback designs mps8跟Lampizator
个人听感,5台dac里面weiss具有最高密度和最顺滑最稳的声底,但在小提琴那部分,感觉声音偏硬了一些,有点铜墙铁壁的意思。蓝波这台胆解码,声音比较鲜活,整体框架也显得比较大,但总觉三频衔接上有点差口气,不如weiss那般具有整体性。soulnote这台密度平衡度都非常不错,算是5台里面表现最中正的,当然也并没有特别出彩的地方。T+A,声音密度可能是5台里面最一般的,相比之下显得不够抓耳,反过来说,倒是最耐听的那一台。dave我觉得是声音最瘦,最缺乏中低频厚润度的,以至于声音整体都偏亮偏硬。
十分用心的比較👍👍👍
草爸配置的系统和音乐太棒了,最好草爸在给予评价,这种方式太好了!点赞
配置好却舍不得拿部入门录音笔收音,真是匪夷所思,他家器材全靠借来蹭来的?录音笔蹭一部好么
I have been very interested on the T+A D-200 and I have a Baltic 4 and this is the first video comparing the T+A DAC200 vs a Lampi DAC, Do you believe I could be upgrading from the Baltic 4 to T+A DAC200 ?
以自己耳機聽起來覺得CHORD DAVE DAC最有立體感跟空間感,其他幾台聽起來就蠻接近的比較區分不出來~
如果草爸能在最後也發表一下自己的感想,會對聽眾更有幫助~畢竟我們是透過耳機喇叭聽的,感覺不一定準~:)
那這樣的表現你覺得如何呢?
ruclips.net/video/7BpOQ10PZSM/видео.html
Lampizator 勝完👍, Soulnote 或T+A 是我第二選,再下來是Chord或Weiss是第三選。
Very good demo! They have their own brand signature as expected but I am surprised T+A has created such air/sound stage in your system. It really matches with your ATC. Subscribed!
Lampizator Horizon DAC效果最佳, 一看價錢,果然一分錢功貨,這一款的價錢等於其他三部的總和(以香港售價作準)!
Thank you for setting up such an incredible matchup of these high end DACs. I was directed to the T+A DAC 200 based on several superlative online reviews, and intending to purchase one, I really scrutinised the playback in comparison with the other DACs. I was already sold by the looks alone of the T+A. However, from what I heard, Soulnote was clearly my pick of the bunch, followed by Chord DAVE, Weiss and Lampizator which were all rather similar sounding. But even factoring the reduced fidelity of playback from RUclips, what really puzzled me was that the T+A struck me as thin, bright and grainy sounding compared to the others... or did I hear wrong!? It would be really helpful as a reference if you could give us your in person impressions of the DACs. Cheers!
DAC200 is wonderful
謝謝草爸用心,很棒又公平的比較,同一道菜,每個人口味不盡相同,個人喜愛soulnote耐聽,但其實每台機器都很有水準,這對喇叭真的相當棒喔!
Lampizator 音色超棒 飽滿、滑順 解析也很好 聲音密度最高 低頻下潛也是最佳 綜合素質個人覺得最好
DAVE的收放真的很快 聽流行真的很爽
Weiss 整體聽下來素質滿平均的 稍微有點數位聲
DAC200 的動態很驚人 我感覺比DAVE更好 這我倒是挺意外! 也稍微有些數位聲
S-3 的音色也很好 但與Lampizator還是有差 但高頻的空氣感比較好
好想看Mola Mola同場比較!
那這樣的表現你覺得如何呢?原始檔也在其中
ruclips.net/video/7BpOQ10PZSM/видео.html
噢這個讚,等回在家聽聽看能不能聽出差異🤗
Thank you. I came to watch this comparison again after watching Mike's PLAYBACK DESIGNS MPD-8 sound demo as to my ears, that's an end game dac. Glad to find the T+A gives you similar SQ (more air and more focus) as the Playback at 1/3 of the price. Might have to start saving for the T + A :)
Lampazator 完全在另外一個境界上大勝。其他幾個聲音都差不多。各有特色。。。但Soulnote聲音很自然。是不錯的選擇。
你是是準確的 Lampazator 是其他几倍价錢
Thanks for putting so much efforts..subscribed to your channel!
soul note最好,音乐味道最好。
Soul Note is the best in this demo, but each dac has their own best practice way.Such DAC200 should use DSD mode,using upsample to dsd512 even dsd1024
讚👍 謝謝超用心錄製。 Horizon Dac 全勝👍👍👍
手機錄音很用心?
那這樣的表現你覺得如何呢?
ruclips.net/video/7BpOQ10PZSM/видео.html
我最喜欢的是Soul note,声音平衡自然,Lampizator解析力更高但不耐听。其他的都不在一个档次
我觉得每首歌的排名都不同。感觉发烧就是一场听者和 mixing engineer 之间的博弈
很好的A/B/C…!Lampizator背景干净、密度动态都够、但略有点hifi;Chord不够静、密度也不够高、也算中正平衡耐听;Weiss密度高、动态够、背景干净,也有贵气但也有一丢丢味精;T+A和Chord相似、声音前者更民用后者更PA,气质都不够hi-end;Soulnote密度动态够、素质好、也不hifi仿佛最平衡耐听但比起L和W稍嫌不够静(本来不应该)而且声音有点慢。
soulnote啲聲效, 隔住個mon, 都聽得出係最活潑明亮同開揚, 而且細節之多, 亦係之最.
Weiss DAC501 MK2 30萬 有這樣的聲音 很不容易 我個人喜歡 playbackdesigns 其他高階 dcs msb (esoteric N05XD) 看個人喜好 另外dartzeel LHC-208 也很特別 雖然這家瑞士廠商比較注重擴大機 最近看到草爸 有一台 MC-3+ Smart Clock USB 有BNC Word Clock AES 這樣機器要怎麼搭配 可以出一段 教學使用 跟 使用後感想嗎?
超級棒的影片分享!!!
建议出掉全部DAC换一部PLAYBACK-MPD8,另出掉麦景图升级一部好的前级(百万台币级别),S3作为音源不错,ATC有源喇叭也很赞!
我听感是dac501中频最好,dave中频密度比dac501差,但dave频宽较优,色彩也偏浓厚,其它几台都在中频有明显缺陷,频宽也是各有参次
Thank you for a very interesting review. Can you tell me which source was used by you ? Grimm and Lumin were noticeable on the rack (this is what I noticed)
請問501買回來還需要買變壓器壓v嗎 from taiwan
光接線就飽了,未看先按讚!
1 hifi 声、背景黑 2中頻略凸少少 3光輝、速度快 4埋身聽感5 平均有細節豐富、五款各有千秋、本人要揀4、5
501 跟T + A 音場很像。501 更好聽一點, 其他的dac 聽起來就比較前一點。 501 是深而且尾韻很好聽。
Lampizator horizon
感覺比較自然,尤其是弦樂
这点我认同
Soulnote 也聽到泛音,較細緻,完勝
Many thanks for your effort!
Very good video , just I would suggest to have your subjective comments on each of them at the end of the video so viewers can compare with their own experience.
希望可以每個dac拍個別的影片和搭配差異
我觉得也是Lampizator好听
I sure wish this awesome comparison was in English. Anyone care to share his outcomes? Very curious about T+A vs DAVE vs Weiss.
一堆评论,没听出来iphone的录音效果可以毁所有整套hiend功力么,起码拿个入门专业录音笔都要好多了。折腾半天除了全频段凹陷听不出什么区别。
期待能做一个Horizon同级别的测试❤
Lampi for the win!
想知道草爸大部分時間爱聽那一部?
太強
用airpod pro聽
Weiss 同 T+A都好似,比Chord更好力
但chord係有一種唔知點講既味道係weiss無既
Ranking:
soulnote>T+A>weiss>chord>lampizator
估唔到日本仔有一手
若是能分享些 鋼琴,小提琴 奏鳴曲,鋼琴三重奏或弦樂四重奏就更棒了!非常有意義的分享,音樂就是要用聽的交流
那這樣的表現你覺得如何呢?
ruclips.net/video/7BpOQ10PZSM/видео.html
尚可
這個三盲鼠手機錄的怎樣?
ruclips.net/video/WyhcVOkiuUQ/видео.html
巴哈 無伴奏 大提琴 史塔克
ruclips.net/video/A0Jd5K0iMnU/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/scPv5rZd8Mc/видео.html
从某种角度就是一分价钱一分货,除了chord dave有些翻车,主要是线条感太强,中频凹陷,缺乏音乐性。
No dealer in the USA has the T+A DAC 200 in stock. They are hard to get right now.
why the holo may kte not in the roundup?
同是Grimm mu1用家,您在测试的时候Mu1的屏幕上显示-20DB,您有使用无源前级为什么还使用Mu1内建数字音量呢
Mu1 default setting -20DB. I'd change to 0db for a preamp
How about Nagra Dac? Compared to these Dacs.
Looking forward to adding Bricasti into the competition
Lampizator Horizon DAC 完勝吧 其他不是不好 只是和他比 就是個弟弟 中的 弟弟 而以
可以加入 HOLO 梅 一起試聽嗎
❤
Hey, one more vote for english subs as your content and comparison is great. Also can you perform environment recording and upload it to be downloadable, this will make comparison better in our main systems. Thanks once again and keep it up!
波兰和T+A 我喜欢
出來的聲壓好像不一樣,還點難以比較。
最喜欢Weiss 501
盲聽最喜歡Lampizator
Electrical Noise Heaven
Lampizator has the best Timbre by far. Just amazing.
But it’s a bit too forward.
Weiss is overall the best to my ears.
T+A is very good and soulnote as well.
DAVE is meh. Thin classic chord sound. Not my cup of tea
chord 音色很重 weiss柔了点
weiss最好
Lampizator is the most analog, most natural and most musical dac. By comparison, all other dacs cannot match it in highs and air.
$$$ :D
T+A音場最廣,其他相差不明顯
片中,我覺得Lampizator動態厚度都好好,我最喜歡,
soulnote中性尾音細節超強,
T+A高清各樣都超好超HIEND,
反而Weiss,chord一般,weiss分析力欠佳
501 and soulnote.
Problem with today's DACs is that they sound "digital" / technical hence music sounds "artificial", not like real music. Sometimes older DACs are better, for me for example one of best sounding DACs ever is still old Levinson 30.5 or 30.6 Reference DAC.
you driving a 60s car or flying a 80s plane? its better :) old is gold
Good! 如果可以的話,用好些少收音咪重錄一次就更好😅
手機錄音同樣的參考就很準了,用專業的麥克風聲音是會比較好些,但都在同樣的比較標準,還是一樣的,有一個重點是現場沒有的,無論用再好的錄音器才也不會無中生有,這是我的心得
手機錄音只能說慘烈
麥克風兩支不過4000台幣,加一個錄音介面,還不到他一組線
ruclips.net/video/7BpOQ10PZSM/видео.html
這個曲目是? 好像在選集聽過,有的話我用手機錄上傳你聽聽
這才是蔡琴正確的錄音,聽了不要感動的流眼淚了,手機帶耳機聽更好聽
ruclips.net/video/CpgPwbQNaPI/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/wbveMjoIGPE/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/fycbZmoQSRg/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/T81mhoyyVn4/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/LfNvBIVhiIs/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/Mqu95FO2p4o/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/mnBvpU2IfOo/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/Wn-rtJVkyQs/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/k0xOOBOGu0o/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/aH66nwYAFW8/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/2_fuaSdvhl8/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/DyWROwQczqI/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/BckhRv4eMak/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/VtemvHuFu5w/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/-DSXIiO849g/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/HiPwtugiP-4/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/A27ilFH8TbI/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/L6HlevpWp2k/видео.html
sound level is bit low , pls increase voice volume
Chord DAVE 一定要加 Mscaler
Dave 要改LPS至到最高境界😅
請加套中文字幕
Weiss man
很大程度上大家都是在聽自己的喇叭…博主應該總結一下自己的聽感
牙很黑