Black Pot features Bawumia, Mahama, NAPO, Akufo-Addo, Wontumi and others.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024
- Black Pot features Bawumia, Mahama, NAPO, Akufo-Addo, Wontumi and others. #urbanblend
Don't forget to subscribe for more Updates: goo.gl/70xoB
Visit the News Site: www.3news.com/ for more.
Follow us on Facebook: / 3fm927
Follow us on Twitter: / 3fm927
Follow us on Instagram: / 3fm92.7
Respect Blakk Rasta.
I like the way you address the Chiefs. They surely shouldn't bring themselves down to the level of the politricktians.
Blakk, Blakk you are doing great work in our country GH. Thank you!
Truth will always defeat lies
Thanks Blakk Rasta. ❤
Only the truth sets we free!
You're good Blakk.I like your presentation. Good job,first time of seeing you.
LØV£♥️,,nuff R£SP£ĆT🫡&BL£SSIŅĠȘ🙏🏽PROPHET!!!!!!!✊🏾✊🏾✊🏾
Dr Francis kwame Nkrumah is watching you from USA
Bawumia is branding himself as liar
He's a pathological liar from birth.
They want to tarnish his reputation and discredit him. The main objective is too divert justice!!
Blaaaaaaaakkkk!!! ❤❤
More fire rasta❤
What matters is that we need to see each other
Respect ✊ ❤
Those who mean well, we know them and as well as just favour seekers.
Blakk Rasta is the real Goat 🐐 among the freedom fighters 😂
Tomfoolery 😅
It is sad the Ghana military will review any military personnel to the public. How can the military defense officials allow a classified information regardless of its importance to the public to be released to the public especially to be read in a public court? Ghana is BROKEN. Ghana will be conquered again by foreigners!
What Is Military Law?
Military law governs the military establishment of a government. Unlike civilian criminal law, military law is entirely disciplinary by nature. Civil courts recognize it as part of the United States body of law as a whole. Every member of the armed forces is always subject to military law.
How Does Military Law Differ from Civilian Law?
A person who joins the United States Military is subject to a different legal system.
A major difference between the United States civilian justice system and the Armed Forces system is their respective purposes. Justice is the purpose of the U.S. civil legal system. The purpose of the military legal system is to provide military commanders with tools to enforce good order and discipline. Lateness is not a crime for civilians, but it is a crime for military personnel.
Where Do the Grounds for Military Law Come From?
Historically, military law precedes the Constitution of the United States. As the supreme law of the land, the Constitution remains the primary source of military law.
The following are other sources of military law:
• International law affecting the law of war from treaties
• Uniform Code of Military Justice
• Executive orders
• Service regulations
• Usages and customs of the Armed Forces and of war
• Military court decisions
Disciplinary Actions
There are several methods the military uses to maintain good order and discipline, not all of which require a hearing:
• Reprimands and Admonitions
• Counseling’s
• Unfavorable Information Files
• Administrative Demotions
• Administrative Discharges
• Court Martial
Can a Federal Civil Court Ever Review a Military Court Conviction?
In rare cases, yes. In the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), military personnel are subject to different laws and standards than civilians. Therefore, federal civil courts do not review military court cases.
However, military courts cannot enforce laws reserved for federal civil courts, just as federal civil courts cannot use the UCMJ. Therefore, if a military court conviction violates a person’s rights under federal or constitutional law, a federal civil court may have the power to review the conviction.
A federal civil court may review a military court conviction if it involves federal or constitutional law issues.
Here are a few examples:
Petitioning for a writ of habeas corpus: arguing that a military conviction constitutes unlawful imprisonment
Petitioning for a writ of mandamus: trying to force a military court to do something under a direct order from the federal civil court
Enforcement of the Tucker Act: attempting to recover for lost pay or benefits as a result of a court-martial conviction
Seeking injunctive relief: asking the federal civil court to force the military court to do something
A federal civil court cannot review a military court decision unless the convicted person has exhausted all available remedies. Therefore, the person must have no other option than to appeal the military court’s decision to a federal civil court. When filing a habeas corpus petition, the convicted person must also be imprisoned or in custody at the time of filing.
Federal civilian courts, reviewing a military court conviction is strictly procedural. Federal courts are not required to review a military court’s decision so long as it provides a fair and reasonable trial to the convicted person.
As long as the decision deals with federal or constitutional issues, other federal courts believe they can review the decision itself.
Why would a uniform code of military justices be allowed in a civilian court in Ghana be presented to a civilian court where a retired military personnel does NOT have a conviction in his record that has not bearing to his civil life from a military justice system be presented in a civil court. This is a capital breach.
What has that got to do with this very procument issues.
Off beat dancer😂
Blackrasta is a propaganda machine let him sit down and watch whiles Akuffo Addo hand over to Bawumia
Goof and gaaf 😂😂😂😂