I like how you adjusted your phone's exposure so you can give us a somewhat accurate view of what our eyes really see when looking at the nvg50's screen very nice test!
@@starsandnightvision pure honesty from personal experience with the NVG30 for almost a year. It can see the stars very well, and is an absolutely cool unit to stargaze with. You can see satellites, the galaxy belt, and stars you cant see and yes…. As well as “REDACTED” objects in the sky. Especially in heavy light pollution cities, its still can see the stars extremely well. For much better experience and clearity. I suggest spending a little extra on the NVG50. But if you want to save cash definitely the nvg30. Bot are absolutely amazing units
@@starsandnightvision wait a second…. I know you…. HEY i watched your vids a while ago on RUclips back a year ago when i was going to get the NVG10, but ended up getting the Nvg30 lol. NVG30 broke on you or? Not as good as NVG10 in stargazing? Me personally from my experience its pretty good. Nvg 50 is much better I LOVE YOUR STARGAZING VIDS!!!! Best out there on RUclips
@@KyzoFox Yeah that's my channel, thanks m8. I prefer the NVG10 for stargazing. Stars are pinpoint sharp all around, unlike my NVG30. Coma is when you see stars getting stretched and distorted, especially outside of the centre. Unfortunately, the NVG line of cameras don't support the UVC USB standard so you can't hook it up to your PC/laptop to get a stable videofeed (only storage).
@ oh ok yea, i see what you mean. Yea thats what i didnt like about the nvg30. Yes it does cover that issue but also the way the lenses are designed. The very center is very very clear in the center of lense in the NVG50, but on the edges yes they are blurry. Simular to the human eye, everything is clear in the center of your vision but the peripheral vision is blurry. Idk that will bother you? But yea its very clearly
I like how you adjusted your phone's exposure so you can give us a somewhat accurate view of what our eyes really see when looking at the nvg50's screen
very nice test!
How well does it see the stars? NVG30 has quite a bit of coma.
@@starsandnightvision pure honesty from personal experience with the NVG30 for almost a year. It can see the stars very well, and is an absolutely cool unit to stargaze with. You can see satellites, the galaxy belt, and stars you cant see and yes…. As well as “REDACTED” objects in the sky.
Especially in heavy light pollution cities, its still can see the stars extremely well.
For much better experience and clearity. I suggest spending a little extra on the NVG50. But if you want to save cash definitely the nvg30. Bot are absolutely amazing units
@@starsandnightvision nvg50 sees the star pretty good. i dont understand coma?
@@starsandnightvision wait a second…. I know you…. HEY i watched your vids a while ago on RUclips back a year ago when i was going to get the NVG10, but ended up getting the Nvg30 lol.
NVG30 broke on you or? Not as good as NVG10 in stargazing? Me personally from my experience its pretty good. Nvg 50 is much better
I LOVE YOUR STARGAZING VIDS!!!! Best out there on RUclips
@@KyzoFox Yeah that's my channel, thanks m8. I prefer the NVG10 for stargazing. Stars are pinpoint sharp all around, unlike my NVG30. Coma is when you see stars getting stretched and distorted, especially outside of the centre. Unfortunately, the NVG line of cameras don't support the UVC USB standard so you can't hook it up to your PC/laptop to get a stable videofeed (only storage).
@ oh ok yea, i see what you mean. Yea thats what i didnt like about the nvg30. Yes it does cover that issue but also the way the lenses are designed. The very center is very very clear in the center of lense in the NVG50, but on the edges yes they are blurry. Simular to the human eye, everything is clear in the center of your vision but the peripheral vision is blurry. Idk that will bother you? But yea its very clearly
lol its because they are the same as the nvg30 , its not an upgrade the circuitry is the same
They should have just called this the NVG30M or pro