Kit Martin On The Stand: Cross-Examination | Pilot Triple Murder Trial (2021)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 сен 2024
- #CourtTV Archive Trials - KY v. Martin (2021) - On cross, The State pressed defendant Christian "Kit" Martin's alibi on the night of the triple murder. Martin claims he was home celebrating an anniversary with his girlfriend.
Watch KY v. Martin in the #CourtTVArchive:
www.courttv.co...
#christianmartin
Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today www.courttv.com/
Join the Investigation Newsletter www.courttv.co...
Court TV Podcast www.courttv.co...
FOLLOW THE CASE:
Facebook / courttv
Twitter/X / courttv
Instagram / courttvnetwork
TikTok / courttvlive
WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE
www.courttv.co...
HOW TO FIND COURT TV
www.courttv.co...
Watch KY v. Martin in the #CourtTVArchive:
www.courttv.com/trials/ky-v-martin-2021/?
KY offered him 5 to 13 years to admit it. He said no. THAT 5 to13 plea deal he turned down is for a Triple murder. Think about that.
His dog tags were in the man’s house that died! His ex set him up!
YESSS!! Why would he leave his dog tags on the shelf!!! Really? That's absurd!! And they were on a string! C'Mon!!!
On a string too!!! This man is a great example of how the court system can be so corrupt.
No! Cause he did it. So she murdered two people? He did it! Such a joke. Either people are gullible or his people put this nonsense out there. Just ridiculous . U hear all this evidence pointing to him. Including his dog tags there. But she set him up? Come on! Can’t be serious. People are so gullible it’s truly amazing
@@Johnnyrocks34 why in the world would he leave his dog tags on the mantle??
@@gailhawthorne8856 ask him! Why would she murder 2 people she had no motive to kill. He had all the motive. So his dog tags being at crime is ur best evidence to say she did it? Lmao. Are u serious? It’s so far fetched. Guy that he hates and screwed him so she kills not 1 but 2 people? No! Doesn’t pass smell test.
Innocent people do get locked up! It happens! It happened to me; so I know!! Free Kit Martin!!!!
He did not commit this
The woman serving as prosecutor is extremely poor at her job. She is probably in her mid to late sixties during this trial. She needs to retire. She may have been sufficient in this position at some point. She is not any longer. She needs to retire. She should not have been assigned to this case. It’s a bit embarrassing, to witness her ineptitude during these proceedings. I’m guessing it’s humiliating for the state of KY as well. I might even say it’s painful to watch her perform her questioning.
It's concerning to hear about the prosecutor's performance in this case. Age alone shouldn't determine one's effectiveness, but if her abilities are in question, it might be worth considering a reassessment. Effective legal representation is crucial for a fair trial, and any shortcomings can indeed be challenging for everyone involved.
It was like watching paint dry listening to her 🙉🙈🙊
@@praytogodus you have stated the obvious. Age alone not being the sole criteria for my opinion. She very possibly may have never been efficient in her career as a prosecutor. Let’s not do the silly, you caught me being “discriminatory” due to the woman’s age. Anyone with well functioning hearing, can state their opinion on this prosecutor’s suitability for this career. Needless to say, at this particular point in her career. Keeping in mind, she perhaps has never been particularly gifted as a prosecutor.
What makes you say she’s incompetent?
@@Maureen-q6wHer performance. Lack of knowledge of the case. It's amazes me there was a conviction!
His assignment:
How to be a jerk without being a jerk.
A+ sir 😂
He is innocent
I don’t know the entire story but I do know guilty people usually do t take the stand.
@@jenettejackson8920so, according to what You claim to ‘know’ who was ‘guilty’? Amber Heard or Johnny Depp?🤔🤔🙄
@@Maureen-q6w The Amber heard and Johnny Depp case was a civil case and not a Criminal Case. I took a class that was tought by a superior court judge. He said that guilty people usually do not testify of course you can’t hold it against them. He also said most innocent people testify and waive a jury trial. I think this guy would have been acquitted if he waived his jury trial. In the Amber heard and Johnny Depp that was a civil matter having to do with financial damages and not a case where the end result was a life sentence.
@@Maureen-q6wI’m guessing you think Amber Heard is as innocent as a lamb? 😂
@@tearsong8744 Absolutely NOT! Amber Heard was the abuser of Johnny Depp’
Very boring. How did they pick that prosecutor? She’s a joke😂
I hope he can be released soon. He does not seem to be a violent person. If he got railroaded, I feel so bad for him 😢.
He did it! I can’t believe how gullible people can be. So guilty it’s ridiculous
He has been found guilty.
@@waynefoote3781 yep! Cause he did it
@@waynefoote3781 so weird that people see quick video of guy who murdered 2 people and say release him! He doesn’t seem violent to me? lol. People are nuts!
When a person is locked up....their disposition changes real quick!
They have no evidence that he is guilty of anything. How can they put someone thru this hell with no real evidence he did anything? Also how they keeping him locked up. Someone help me understand this please.
Because we have a corrupt system. This poor guy was framed!!!! I believe his ex has dirty hands in this. She promised to destroy him. I lost sleep over this one.
Shell casings are real evidence. Guns/bullets are real evidence. Video and cell records are real evidence. Kit carrying in bottles of kerosene on the night of the murders/burning is evidence. Witness seeing Kit on Rosetown Rd is real evidence. Etc etc etc. You may not like or agree with the evidence, but there was evidence.
Free Kit Martin!!!
Please free him
Unprepared attorney, painfully boring, reading every word.
When this guy was on the stand It was vERY HARD to believe him. The jury obviously agreed. That story about the back door? NOT acceptable. When is this guy up for parole? It has been a while since I saw this.
Well never since he was sentenced to life without parole
I totally disagree with you. Obviously you have no clue how military men are trained to not wear their emotions on their sleeve. This guy is so innocent it is sickening. He ticked off someone in very high places with going over the military brass heads re: his court martial. They used his ex to frame him. His ex promised she would destroy him. She succeeded.
So what! He has long been found guilty and I don't care about any CLUE as to how military men are trained. The Jury decided a long time ago. like someone else here said, Life without parole.@@5GreenAcres
Military makes NO difference! He was found guilty....
I found him very believable. I saw a broken man who has served this country and not a polished speaker fighting for his life.
This is a set up
This one is a classic! Top Gun vs State.
You can see this guy aging ten years in ten minutes during this tremendous cross. He was 300 years old by the time the prosecutor was done with him.
100% sure he’s guilty. Too many things to not be him.
Hopefully, Buffy isn’t ever called for jury duty.
Ditto. He is so slimy. He cant fool me.
He has a little cheer squad. They are so bilious. Murder is murder.
He did it, he did it, he did it. He literally thinks he can con us all. Many of you have fallen for it.
he does have that look.
So true! Guy is so guilty. Its a joke
He didn't do it, you obviously have no common sense. There is no evidence other than a dog tag on a string left on a mantle. Pathetic. Please do us all a favor and don't serve on a jury. You need common sense and evidence to be able to serve. Obviously Kit ended up with a jury that had neither of the two.
Wonder if there an appeal coming ? I just didn’t think he was guilty. Imo
He reeked of guilt IMO. I found him such a conman. Very devious indeed.
I think one has been and gone. Kentucky Supreme Court upheld his convictions. Crazy to me. This case has corruption written all over it imo
@@carrow1057I’m curious what evidence convinced you? What were things you identified as problematic with this case and with the defendant?
@@carrow1057any evidence behind that presumption?
He lost the appeal with the Ky Supreme Court - a ruling that was flawed or corrupted on its own right.
Somehow, the Ky Supreme Court was provided an incorrect narrative of the evidence from the lower court. And used the fictional evidence to base their assessment of the lower court’s actions/ruling.
Two of the Supreme Court Justices were classmates with Judge John Atkins, at University of Louisville, Brandeis school of Law, graduating class of 1977.
Not that this is relevant, but I think he is SO handsome. Thank you for letting me share. I truly do not know if he is guilty or not. 😢
😅😂
It's alright to appreciate someone's appearance, but it's essential to remember that guilt or innocence should be determined by the evidence and legal proceedings.
Very handsome 😜
@@praytogodus I totally agree.
@@marthaalexander4441 Thank you!
He did it! His wife setting him up by murdering 3 people is just ridiculous
A jury found him guilty that isn’t the same thing as “He did it!” Justice is imperfect and sometimes innocent people get convicted. Why are you so desperate to paint this man as a killer? What difference does it make to you if people agree with your opinion on his guilt or not? 🤔
@@tearsong8744 cause he did it and him blaming it on his ex is so ridiculous. Why are you so gung ho defending him? Do you know him? Just curious.
@@Johnnyrocks34 Never had the pleasure I'm afraid and your reasoning still doesn't make sense. There are people who think the moon landing is fake and the Earth is flat are you going to start arguments insulting all of those people too? Why can't you just let it go? You don't even do anything to try and convince people your opinion is correct. Unless you think insulting people wins you hearts and minds?
@@tearsong8744 im reading through my comments. Where did i insult someone?
@@tearsong8744 you messaged me asking why im do gung ho painting him as killer. I wrote 2 sentences. So what are you talking about. You wrote me a long paragraph. Its called having a conversation. If you wanna believe his ex wife did it than go ahead. I think its comical
He is innocent,his ex wife is evil and hates him, she is the guilty one.
Its best that no one attempts to portray his non-wife as a poor victimized woman. She was and is a criminal. She was not divorced,she broke the law. It’s pretty incredible she would try to bring any accusations against anyone. Let alone the man she committed a crime against. Women can be some of the worst people in any given scenario. It’s naive to think otherwise. And I am a woman.
I absolutely believe that this man is innocent 😢
I remember the squeaky shoes
Ok Wayne Foote
Free Kit Martin. He did not do this.
Innocent man set up by evil ex wife - FREE KIT
Possibly top military brass too. Remember, he went above their heads on an upcoming case against him.
Okay we can't be right all the time
He actually used to comb elvis quiff for people’s needs in the barber 💈 business sector for television media companies etc. just for holidays and perks so their all lies
The prosecutor needs to retire that hairdo.
I know absolutely nothing about this case but I do know this - nobody needs that many guns.
I guess everybody got a big surprise today
I just saw that on the news, yep he's guilty