You can fit more teeth with normal teeth than cycloidal gear teeth. This gearbox take ideas from harmonic and cycloidal gearbox. I can achieve a more linear/uniform movement with this design than the cycloidal gearbox. But the torque transmision is very poor.
@@riddellriddell a little bit. But I've realized that the principal source of nonlinearity is very small but important misalignement of the axis. In the 'perihelium' the movement is faster and in the 'aphelium' the movement is slower, that is why you can see a 1rev/rev pulse in the movement of the output gear.
why did you switch from cycloidal gears to normalish gears? what is the benefit?
You can fit more teeth with normal teeth than cycloidal gear teeth. This gearbox take ideas from harmonic and cycloidal gearbox. I can achieve a more linear/uniform movement with this design than the cycloidal gearbox. But the torque transmision is very poor.
@@urielalbertodiazreynoso6309 with the cycloidal gearbox did the helical gearing not work for smoothing out the motion?
@@riddellriddell a little bit. But I've realized that the principal source of nonlinearity is very small but important misalignement of the axis. In the 'perihelium' the movement is faster and in the 'aphelium' the movement is slower, that is why you can see a 1rev/rev pulse in the movement of the output gear.
@@urielalbertodiazreynoso6309 Still exciting stuff. would be interested to see how it wears over time
@@riddellriddell I don't know. Soon I will present some of this gearboxes attached to a very fast motor. The wear will be evident.