Also, EBITDA does not consider working capital requirements. A company can make lots of earnings but be illiquid as they do not have the cash required to operate.
I first learned about EBITDA when the CEO of my company used it in a presentation. For the life of me I couldn't understand why people would want a number that ignores expenses. Seemed to me like a dodgy way to overstate profits. Turns out my instinct was right.
Yeah it's just a way for highly leveraged and risky companies to make themselves look like they're doing well. Then they start using adjusted ebitda for those companies that are struggling to even make ebitda look good!
it actually makes sense because depreciation is not a cash expense, it is generally not normalized to market cap but enterprise value.. enterprise value is like what market cap would have been in the absence of debt and cash.. however, in the long term cash flows converge to nopat, and eventually, cash flow is the king
Specifically says it does NOT complain with generally accepted accounting principles. Yet people go straight to it. Might as well say we’re hiding the debt but it’s still profitable
This is why EBITDA is not looked at in a vacuum. You would do a quality of earnings analysis focused on EBITDA in addition to working capital analysis and debt and debt like analysis to get a more full picture
I agree with Munger. Yes, EBITDA allows you to compare companies with different capital structures, but it does so without accounting for the fact that different businesses have different capital expenditures and working capital needs. EBITDA is a terrible metric for companies that constantly have to reinvest in plant and equipment or R&D just to keep their businesses competitive.
Great summary of why Wall St sell side uses EBITDA for specific industry stock price valuation and targets while long term investors should be quite skeptical of this ploy
EBITDA means Earning Before Interest Taxes Depreciation and Amortisation. In French it is called EBE in other words Excédent Brut d’Exploitation. EBITDA refers to figures from the Income statement. It is the result that shows the real operating efficiency. In accounting terms only accounts of classes 6 and 7 are concerned.
Motivation is key to understanding, banks like EBITDA so they can lend you more, they also use financial covenants to manage debt loads. As a rule of thumb, it youre doing well with net income youre growing your bank account!
Both measures are useful in my opinion because every business has two legs one is operational and the other is financial, as a long term investor you should check each separately before taking a decision.
Excellent explanation. Deserved a 10x likes. A bit too fast for a subject that makes you think while you talk. I would've loved to see more on the worked out example. Pls do the same for key financial ratios.
EBITDA may be hated for certain reasons. However, it can be very important in some situations. In some cases in Europe, you can only claim tax deductions on interest of 30% of EBITDA. This stops people financing a company with high intra-group loans claiming high tax deductions on interest. When buying a private company, you want to see what the EBITDA is so you can see how profitable a company may be without interest and taxes which can be different depending on who the owners are. So be careful before you think that Charlie and Warren are always correct in every situation.
I’ve heard a lot of companies are starting to use EBIT( earnings before interest and taxes). Especially PE companies looking to acquire small businesses.
Depends on the business but debt is cheaper than equity. if you have a business that has a constant cashflow it's better for them. The M&M research shows that really well
I would like to help the company I work for, allowing them to pay me 10 years up front... then they can amortize it lowering expense and make huge profits. Win-Win!
The definition for depreciation you used is really wrong. You should not teach this if you define inflation the way you did… it is a reduction in the value of an asset over time, due in particular to wear and tear.
Your example of the two companies and how they are financed is a great illustration of why EBITDA sets off alarm bells. I retired from a company that started including EBITDA in quarterly earnings reports only after they went public and had to soothe shareholders. Of course Charlie Munger was right about EBITDA.
Ebitda is a great metric to make apples to apples comparison. That being said it is not bullet-proof. Asset heavy businesses (like Telecom) is not suitable for Ebitda valuations given high Depreciation charges. Ebitda alone does not factor in the full cashflow generation power of a company. A company can be highly profitable on Ebitda basis but working capital and capex requirements can wipe out all the operating cash (if not more), reverse is also applicable. Thats why there is no single multiple for all types of businesses. Financial analysts (bankers) factor in all these moving parts to make sense of the valuation multiple based on Ebitda. Nevertheless it is a great metric to compare similar businesses in the same industries and should shed a lot of light on operating performance of the company.
No - owners earnings are effectively the amount of capital that be pulled out of a business without harming it. It’s a much harder number to achieve than EBITDA.
@@BrianFeroldiYT Thanks. I guess then, if you are asking for ideas, a similar explanation and example of owner earnings, perhaps contrasting with EBITDA, would be fun. Regardless, thanks for all your efforts.
Yeah well if you’re pure minority stock investor then yes, EBITDA does give you much insights as you’re probably more into net income (dividends) and free cash flow (whether company has enough resources to grow). But let’s be honest, if you’re buying companies out then you look at EBITDA because you don’t give a shit about capital structure or tax costs. You want to see how strong earnings the business can generate which tells you a lot about its performance
Incorrect. They are cash expenses at the time of purchase, reflected on the cash flow statement. However, they are non-cash expenses on the income statement.
Nothing wrong with ebitda, you just need to account for average replacement investements. Which isnt necessarily equal to depreciation. But I agree that basing valuations solely on ebitda is dishonest, especially for capital heavy companies.
Hello, a university student in investment club here. Yeah, EBITDA is used a lot, and seeing it as non GAAP, i asked my seniors who replied with differrent capital structure businesses, especially new companies that has bought a lot of equipments which incurs a lot of depreciation. I always use the P/E valuation to track a company, not EV/EBITDA as im unfamiliar with it
Let’s be honest here and Munger or this video could make you think that EBITDA is the sole metric we are using… Not at all, it is one of them and we can be pretty sure that BH did/do use EBITDA in their evaluation. If it was that simple we would be all rich… or poor Munger was also a real BS’ter too. Whenever I hear about Warren and Charlie, I think of the two old farts of the Muppet show sitting at their balcony laughing at their own jokes 😂 RIP Charlie, EBITDA is still used!
Thanks for watching! Grab a free PDF copy of Bufett's Financial Rules of thumb here: longtermmindset.co/buffett
And spell Buffett correctly please.
Also, EBITDA does not consider working capital requirements. A company can make lots of earnings but be illiquid as they do not have the cash required to operate.
Good point
That's the reason u always look at the cash flow statement
thats why EBITDA is just a proxy for operating cash and you layer in working capital after to adjust for free cash flow....
Correct! Most commen made fault in Entrepeneurship, under estimating the cashflow, ending up in more debt…😊
I first learned about EBITDA when the CEO of my company used it in a presentation. For the life of me I couldn't understand why people would want a number that ignores expenses. Seemed to me like a dodgy way to overstate profits. Turns out my instinct was right.
Yet sooo many companies still use it
Yeah it's just a way for highly leveraged and risky companies to make themselves look like they're doing well. Then they start using adjusted ebitda for those companies that are struggling to even make ebitda look good!
it actually makes sense because depreciation is not a cash expense, it is generally not normalized to market cap but enterprise value.. enterprise value is like what market cap would have been in the absence of debt and cash.. however, in the long term cash flows converge to nopat, and eventually, cash flow is the king
It's not that much different from when any lender or Landlord asks and only cares about your Gross; not your net after deductions/expenses
It also gives you a general proxy for operating cash by removing non cash
Specifically says it does NOT complain with generally accepted accounting principles. Yet people go straight to it. Might as well say we’re hiding the debt but it’s still profitable
Evitda means nothing without cash flow statement.
Actually, I knew that EBITDA is widely used, and that both Buffett and Munger disliked it, always wondered why. Thanks for the clarification!!
Glad it was useful!
This is why EBITDA is not looked at in a vacuum. You would do a quality of earnings analysis focused on EBITDA in addition to working capital analysis and debt and debt like analysis to get a more full picture
I agree with Munger. Yes, EBITDA allows you to compare companies with different capital structures, but it does so without accounting for the fact that different businesses have different capital expenditures and working capital needs. EBITDA is a terrible metric for companies that constantly have to reinvest in plant and equipment or R&D just to keep their businesses competitive.
I think Munger’s logic is sound
@@BrianFeroldiYT
straight to the point.
Great summary of why Wall St sell side uses EBITDA for specific industry stock price valuation and targets while long term investors should be quite skeptical of this ploy
Thanks for watching
I doubt wall street uses ebitda for valuation. It’s one metric. But valuation is generally done using dcf.
Well explained..! IMHO the background music becomes a nuisance after a while...
Thanks for the feedback
I second that.
agreed
EBITDA means Earning Before Interest Taxes Depreciation and Amortisation. In French it is called EBE in other words Excédent Brut d’Exploitation. EBITDA refers to figures from the Income statement. It is the result that shows the real operating efficiency. In accounting terms only accounts of classes 6 and 7 are concerned.
Motivation is key to understanding, banks like EBITDA so they can lend you more, they also use financial covenants to manage debt loads. As a rule of thumb, it youre doing well with net income youre growing your bank account!
Both measures are useful in my opinion because every business has two legs one is operational and the other is financial, as a long term investor you should check each separately before taking a decision.
Always agreed with him. Good principles
Excellent explanation. Deserved a 10x likes. A bit too fast for a subject that makes you think while you talk.
I would've loved to see more on the worked out example.
Pls do the same for key financial ratios.
Thanks for the feedback!
earnings and free cash flow are better then?
Good explanation 👍
Absolutely great overview of EBITDA
Thanks for watching
Really love videos like this! Interesting, informative and clearly explained 😊
Glad you enjoyed it!
EBITDA may be hated for certain reasons. However, it can be very important in some situations. In some cases in Europe, you can only claim tax deductions on interest of 30% of EBITDA. This stops people financing a company with high intra-group loans claiming high tax deductions on interest. When buying a private company, you want to see what the EBITDA is so you can see how profitable a company may be without interest and taxes which can be different depending on who the owners are. So be careful before you think that Charlie and Warren are always correct in every situation.
Sure. This video is meant to be more of an overview.
EBITDA is a Revenue metric. Key point noted: A portion of interest payments may be claimed as a tax deduction.
Best Finance video I have ever seen
Wow! Thanks for the huge compliment
Awesome video, thanks for the upload!
Glad you enjoyed it!
I’ve heard a lot of companies are starting to use EBIT( earnings before interest and taxes). Especially PE companies looking to acquire small businesses.
That makes more sense to me. Still far from my favorite profit metric.
Not a great metric. Never gives you info on working capital and cash flows
I recently learned about EBITDAC - essentially removing the impacts of Covid
There is no correlation between EBITDA and a company’s free cash flow. Which is all that really matters
Not a direct one anyway
@@BrianFeroldiYT maybe an inverse correlation, every company with a high EBITDA and low cash is destined for the financial toilet
Charlie was 100% correct, it's a waste of time.
Why not have IBCOGS?
Income
Before
Cost
Of
Goods
Sold
lol. Wall Street would love that one.
Love it. Thanks from HK.
Our pleasure!
Great breakdown 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
Thanks for watching
Hey, Brian, can you do a video on why you have Cloudflair on a short leash? Appreciate you.
I think you mean that for Brian Stoffel
Financing through debt shouldn’t be taken lightly. Far too many companies do this.
Agreed
Depends on the business but debt is cheaper than equity. if you have a business that has a constant cashflow it's better for them. The M&M research shows that really well
Is not what you make.....is what you keep!!!!
Correct
I would like to help the company I work for, allowing them to pay me 10 years up front... then they can amortize it lowering expense and make huge profits.
Win-Win!
lol - yup! This is a great reason why including operating leases as debt makes no sense to me
Ever heard something like cash flow statement
Nobody value a company based on its EBITDA
Umm….. have you ever heard of private equity?
The definition for depreciation you used is really wrong. You should not teach this if you define inflation the way you did… it is a reduction in the value of an asset over time, due in particular to wear and tear.
What he has used is correct. Slowly the interpretation changed to what you are mentioning. But both are still the same.
Wut he like den? Do he go wit operational cash flow, free cash flow ?
Interesting history lesson.
Glad you enjoyed it
very interesting
Your example of the two companies and how they are financed is a great illustration of why EBITDA sets off alarm bells. I retired from a company that started including EBITDA in quarterly earnings reports only after they went public and had to soothe shareholders. Of course Charlie Munger was right about EBITDA.
Glad to hear it was useful
Ebitda is a great metric to make apples to apples comparison. That being said it is not bullet-proof. Asset heavy businesses (like Telecom) is not suitable for Ebitda valuations given high Depreciation charges. Ebitda alone does not factor in the full cashflow generation power of a company. A company can be highly profitable on Ebitda basis but working capital and capex requirements can wipe out all the operating cash (if not more), reverse is also applicable.
Thats why there is no single multiple for all types of businesses. Financial analysts (bankers) factor in all these moving parts to make sense of the valuation multiple based on Ebitda.
Nevertheless it is a great metric to compare similar businesses in the same industries and should shed a lot of light on operating performance of the company.
Good color
Naturally, companies that have lots of debt LOVE EBITDA...lol. Who wouldn't? "If you take out all the bad stuff, our company looks pretty solid."
Lol
Aren’t owner earnings a lot like EBITDA?
No - owners earnings are effectively the amount of capital that be pulled out of a business without harming it. It’s a much harder number to achieve than EBITDA.
@@BrianFeroldiYT Thanks. I guess then, if you are asking for ideas, a similar explanation and example of owner earnings, perhaps contrasting with EBITDA, would be fun. Regardless, thanks for all your efforts.
Speculate to accumulate!
Loans are not intangible assets,,,,,
Correct - but they are amortized
It's for Special purposes. If you have to ask it's not for you, it's a very obvious Accounting tool when you know what it's used for
Very nice. I would skip the music and slow down the pace of speech if I were you.
Thanks for the feedback
Yeah well if you’re pure minority stock investor then yes, EBITDA does give you much insights as you’re probably more into net income (dividends) and free cash flow (whether company has enough resources to grow). But let’s be honest, if you’re buying companies out then you look at EBITDA because you don’t give a shit about capital structure or tax costs. You want to see how strong earnings the business can generate which tells you a lot about its performance
Lol
EBITDA is used as a proxy for the annual operating cashflow. That's why EBITDA has been used since the dawn of time
That might explain depreciation and amortization, but doesn't explain excluding interest expense and taxes.
EBITDA was invented in the 1970s by John Malone.
I thought I was the last one to see a scam in Ebitda :))))
Depreciation and amortization are cash expenses
Incorrect. They are cash expenses at the time of purchase, reflected on the cash flow statement. However, they are non-cash expenses on the income statement.
Earnings Before All The Bad Stuff
Lol
...yet u still see "CFA"s who base all their valuation on EBITDA on youtube for years posing as stock analysts "for" investors. tsk tsk Cameron
Yup….
😢
Nothing wrong with ebitda, you just need to account for average replacement investements. Which isnt necessarily equal to depreciation.
But I agree that basing valuations solely on ebitda is dishonest, especially for capital heavy companies.
Hello, a university student in investment club here. Yeah, EBITDA is used a lot, and seeing it as non GAAP, i asked my seniors who replied with differrent capital structure businesses, especially new companies that has bought a lot of equipments which incurs a lot of depreciation. I always use the P/E valuation to track a company, not EV/EBITDA as im unfamiliar with it
@@icecream6256 yes p/e def better then ebitda nonsense. but p/e is also very manipulated its the free cashflows where the magic really seems to happen
Let’s be honest here and Munger or this video could make you think that EBITDA is the sole metric we are using… Not at all, it is one of them and we can be pretty sure that BH did/do use EBITDA in their evaluation. If it was that simple we would be all rich… or poor
Munger was also a real BS’ter too. Whenever I hear about Warren and Charlie, I think of the two old farts of the Muppet show sitting at their balcony laughing at their own jokes 😂
RIP Charlie, EBITDA is still used!
Please turn the music off and speak way more slowly. I’m not 5.
Feedback recieved!
I HATE IT TOO !!!
😭🤷🏿♂️
Let's just all pay 40x community adjusted EBITDA ;D
Lol
remove the song behind pls
Good feedback
@@BrianFeroldiYT or decrease the volume :) thanks
Stfv & leave thanks
Didn't forget about the even dodgier adjusted ebitda!
I was thinking about making a video about that…
Hate these click bait thumbnails
Fell for it too
Ebitda??? Latka says what???
Long story short...listen to the accountant, not the capitalist
I hate this music
Great video but very distracting, repetitive, sanitary music
Noted
In short it's a sham
rip to a goat 📈🇺🇸
He was a gem
This is so good. Lol
:)
So much wrong information in your video, don't know where to start...
Elaborate 🤔
@@summerbreeze5115 The definition of amortization is inaccurate. The statement that EBIT and operating income are the same is also false.
@@summerbreeze5115statement that EBITDA doesn't include SBC
Constructive feedback is always appreciated
Never knew tax expenses weren't operating expenses. As if you don't pay and would continue to operate.