Set up Microsoft Exact Data Match - Sensitive Info Type Setup

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 июл 2024
  • This is the final video in the series on building an EDM solution using Microsoft Purview. In this video, we will set up the Sensitive Info Definition that uses EDM. I will cover creating the SIT using XML, and cover the key decisions/items that go into your policy design.
    L I N K S
    MSFT Doc
    learn.microsoft.com/en-us/mic...
    Git Hub Design
    github.com/dougsbaker/Public-...
    github.com/dougsbaker/Public-...
    C H A P T E R S
    00:00 Intro
    00:41 Create an EDM SIT Rule Pack using XML
    14:59 Upload Rule Pack
    17:06 Test EDM SIT / Diagnosing Issues
    20:45 Adding EDM SIT to Data Loss Prevention Policy
    22:55 EDM Primary Match Issue testing
    28:22 Wrap Up

Комментарии • 7

  • @skywalk3rcodm917
    @skywalk3rcodm917 Год назад +1

    This is impressive 👍🏻

  • @2tempests1hearld
    @2tempests1hearld Год назад +1

    Hey Doug! I wanted to say that I came across your videos while trying to figure out how in the world to deal with Microsoft DLP. Thank you for the content and the work you put in. I know one more sub isn't a big deal in the grand scheme of things but I hope it helps and keeps you encouraged to keep making such informative and topical videos on a crazy expansive and complicated product

    • @DougDoesTech
      @DougDoesTech  Год назад

      Thanks Eric! The kind words mean a ton!

  • @Arte-MMN
    @Arte-MMN Год назад

    Hi Doug, very nice video series, help a lot to understand EDM. One question, can this be configure only in the tenant_? I mean every xml that you configured locally, can be done everything just using the office365 tenant EDM feature? thanks!

    • @DougDoesTech
      @DougDoesTech  Год назад

      Yes since I made this video they now have an option for configuring in the gui. So no need to do the xml.

  • @coryhogan8667
    @coryhogan8667 Год назад +1

    Hey Doug!
    This video helped me understand the back end much better.
    I see in your final code you went back to the original classifier WITH the keyword (string below). Was this indeed the final solution? I am having the same issue - though I often find the throttling can take up to an hour or so to reflect the changes. Curious if you found the issue elsewhere and it was not a keyword issue.

    • @DougDoesTech
      @DougDoesTech  Год назад

      Hey Cory, sorry I forgot to put the update in. It was a throttling issue. I didn’t give enough time from making the edit to it going live. When I went back and checked later it all worked fine.