Toyota Kluger 2024 review - Turbo or Hybrid 7 seater SUV test!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 июн 2024
- It used to be so simple - if you wanted a Toyota SUV, you chose the hybrid version if possible.
Now? Hmmm. You might want to think twice about that.
That's because the new turbocharged version of the Toyota Kluger (or Highlander as it's known elsewhere) is exceptionally good. It's so much better than the V6 petrol that it replaces, making for a far more enjoyable and relaxed family SUV.
It's so good, in fact, that it might have you wondering if spending all the extra money for the hybrid version is actually worth it. Especially when you consider the turbo-petrol model is actually pretty fuel-efficient in its own right, as you'll see from the results in my family test review
There are things that still aren't terrific about this car -- it looks a bit dated already, and the tyres are shockingly bad. But in a lot of other ways, it's easy to see why so many people step straight from the RAV4 to the Kluger when their family grows enough to need three rows of seats.
--
00:00 Intro
00:36 Is it the right price?
02:41 What are the best alternatives?
04:31 Is it the right size?
06:30 Interior
12:30 Under the bonnet
14:10 Driving
17:16 Efficiency
18:36 Is it safe?
19:52 Ownership
20:44 Verdict
--
I am aiming to review every new car on the market that people actually buy, to help new-car customers like you, or curious car enthusiasts (maybe also like you) get the right steer when it comes to choosing a new set of wheels.
If you're looking for a car for yourself, monitoring the market and hunting for the latest info, or even if you've just bought your new car and you're looking to see what experts like me think about it, The Right Car will offer you something of value.
Subscribe to The Right Car: / @therightcar
I'm aiming to upload a review or two per week, so if you have any specific cars you want me to take a look at, please feel free to leave a comment. Any feedback on my content is welcome, and you can feel free to email me or hit me up on social media.
I'm eager to see this new channel grow, and it can only do that with your support and feedback - so please let me know if there's anything you don't like, want more of, or would like to see changed. I'd love to hear from you.
Follow The Right Car on social media to see what I'm up to and to ask any questions!
The Right Car:
TikTok: / therightcar.au
Instagram: / therightcar.au
MERCH: therightcar.myshopify.com/
#toyota #suv #review 
Авто/Мото
great honest review mate, keep im comming
Always honest. 👍
good review
Just got mine 💯 recommend over the rave4 but only in “”hybrid”” after 5K efficiency is still impressive with 6L/100km which is very good, the GXL is the sweet spot as value for money, I get so many compliments when people enter the car, Vehicle is quick to respond, Fast, Comfortable, Spacious.
Nice!
how long did you wait from the time you put down a deposit to the day you got your car?
12 month@@darkphoenix8350
Hi, have the 2021 Hybrid of this, fuel economy is currently sitting at 5.5 with expectation of going down to 5.4 when Melbourne finally sees summer... 3rd row has been used for a 160 round trip and occupants are still talking to me (they were about 5ft 6 and middle seat moved forward)
So the entry level Kluger GX AWD (which is made in the USA) for $55,790 (non-hybriid) is priced the same as a top of the line Ssanyong Rexton diesel 2.2 (made in South Korea) with rear auto diff lock and 3.5T braked towing capacity.
Too dear. I would probably go for the Sorrento.
Hi, Can you please do a comparison review of Kluger vs Pathfinder vs CX90 model 2024
How does this drive compared to a Lexus RX?
What tyres would you change to?
I’ve had a hybrid grande for 2 years now… achieving 6 litres/100 klm
typo for santa fe comparison price.
Anyone considering a Kluger should have a good long look at the Kia Carnival. They're not as expensive, have much more room inside, longer warranty, but engine options may not be to your liking unless you want a thirsty V6 or can put up with a diesel.
Kia's engine is rubbish im telling you now.
@@takz200 You're telling us NOW? Why didn't you tell us sooner?
Just one thing, long distance driving would be the worst for hybrid efficiency. The more stop start your driving, the more improvement over a normal engine. There's nothing magic about hybrid, it just allows for the use of regenerative breaking. For long trips you're probably talking about less braking and higher speeds where wind resistance and rolling resistance of all types of kluger would be the same.
Not true.
I thought the same thing: long trips would not be much better in the hybrid than a petrol Kluger. I was wrong. Sydney to Melbourne and return with 4 adults and luggage, 7 l/100km. Economy mode, aircon always on, cruise control most of the time, sitting on or near the speed limit.
4.02 Ouch From $446,050 for a Santa Fe, little bit out of my price range :(
Yeah, typos happen. :(
Toyota really need to come up with a futuristic exterior or interior design.
yeesh that interior design, designed for the North American market where this vehicle is known as Highlander... that said removing the awful 3.5L V6 for a turbo petrol i4 2.4L was a smart choice for one simple reason: Accessible torque.
That said, but the Petrol NA Hybrid version just for the electric AWD option.
First time I've ever heard the 3.5 V6 called awful.
@@mvnorsel6354 - well no you have.
I'll explain why to me its an awful engine. TORQUE
The V6 NA engine needs arrpxo. 4,700rpm to make 357Nm, this is on 91 RON (no benefit to run 95 or 98 unless you want extra top end power).
The i4 turbo petrol needs approx 2,000rpm to make 420Nm and holds that torque production to about 4,000rpm (torque curve), granted on 95 RON.
Hence why I said Accessible Torque, when you convert torque to kilowatts at 2,000rp the i4 turbo petrol generates at flywheel 88kW where as the V6 generates approx. 42% torque at the same revs which is 150Nm which is 31kW, the difference is 47kW in favour of the smaller i4 turbo petrol.
So yes the 3.5L V6 NA is an awful engine, to get anything decent from it you need revs which sure is great when driving at over 200km/h but where exactly can you do that legally in Australia?
even if you look at the top end of the torque curve the i4 turbo petrol at 4,000rpm makes 420Nm which is 176kW , the V6 NA still has yet to peak its torque, again the V6 makes more top end power but how long can you use that peak top end power and where? other than entering a free/highway via on-ramp.
I'm a little bit late to the party on this comment... I owned a 2014 V6 Kluger for 9 years / 130,000km. Over this period of time, I averaged 10.4 l / 100km, with a bias toward intercity / interstate cruising (typically 8-9 l / 100km depending on the load), with some urban driving (typically 12-14 l / 100 km). It was a magnificent car - silky smooth, reliable, and powerful when you buried the boot to overtake. I would never describe that v6 as awful.... even if it was not as torquey as the new turbo 4 at lower speeds.
Hybrid is the way if you ask me. Turbo 4 would be really nice too I assume and probably appeal more to a buyer looking for an engine with good low end torque. But the V6 will be missed.
The low end torque is the big improvement. The V6 was good but needed revs and loved a drink.
I have the V6 and it’s thirsty as f@$&. Great acceleration and smooth but can’t afford to fuel it so will change to the hybrid.
It's thirsty but My 2019 GXL AWD is still under 12L/100km, i think u just need drive it smoothly and gently. The hybrid batteries would cost several thousands when replace after 8 years. @@felix_five
Santa Fe price has typo
Sure does. 🥹
Given the current craze of hybrid and EV battery fires, it isn't a difficult decision.
An EV fire is considerably less likely as opposed to a diesel fire which was the likely cause of the Luton airport fire over in London lol.
You mean, the current craze to cover EV fires on the news? There’d be no time for any other headlines if the big networks only covered ICE car fires….
Fires have never been an issue with Toyota hybrids.
@@argent10k Unfortunately that isn't true. That is just wishes.
@@therightcar I notice you don't deny that the fires occur. Some of the issues you need to understand is that when the EV fire does occur, they can't be put out, they accelerate significantly faster, they are significantly hotter and they produce a deadly smoke. All these issues change the nature of the fire and lead to worse outcomes. Another issue I want to highlight for you, is that the number of EV's on the road is very small compared to ICE cars. If we find ourselves in a situation where EV's have become more numerous, then we will see an uptick in incidences and we may start to see deadly results. If you look at the Luton fire as an example; one battery fire ended with the building collapse. The owner of the car was unable to put the fire out with the nearby red extinguisher. If this was an ICE fire, the damage would have been limited to one vehicle. Lastly I want to mention one more issue that gives me great concern. I can foresee the likelihood that we have thugs looking through parking stations for EVs to ignite the battery. Please reconsider the promotion of battery powered vehicles, and issue a no buy recommendation. Lives are at risk and great tragedy is just around the corner. You are in a position to act so please do so.
The headrests on these Toyota's are ludicrous. Check the angle! Literally a pain in the neck. I simply can't tolerate them and I'm surprised it's not mentioned by more testers.
My head does not touch the headrest in my normal driving position. Close, but not touching.
Full size spare wheel it is.
Fair enough!
@@therightcar and the same alloy wheel, at least in the 2022 model.
You can easily add the Outlander PHEV to the competition...that car is effortless, spacious, compact and luxurious
18:25 Toyota spec minimum *95ron* for *HYBRID*
The main issue with the pricing that is that jump from 2wd to awd is very expensive
Also why is no hybrid 2wd offered?
2l/100 km difference between turbo petrol and hybrid ish and with hybrid costing 2500$ more than awd turbo (apples to apples)
So for 15000 km yearly give a saving of about 500-600 on petrol
So need about 4-5 years to get your money back !!
Unless you do at least 30000 km yearly i think the hybrid is not really worth it
BUT the hybrid is likely more reliable than the petrol as that turbo engine is still relatively new
The hybrid is likely to have a thermal runaway. The turbo would be a much better choice with its 8 speed conventional auto transmission.
@@buncha5651 toyota been having hybrids for 20 years mate
Have not heard about Camry hybrids on fire
Unless Toyotas will be using lithium in their hybrid batteries then the risk is slightly higher
@@buncha5651 - unlikely as its not a lithium ion battery, the tech that Toyota uses Nickel Metal Hydrate,
Kluger hybrid uses 95 RON
it's not a turbo engine and its Euro 5 so yes it can run on 91 RON.
@@351tgv The notice behind the petrol filler flap says E10 suitable, Premium Unleaded recommended. I've tried both and can't tell the difference. Generally, I use 95.
good old made in the usa quality
You missed Mitsubishi outlander bro 😢
Unlike the popular RAV4, this generation Kluger is totally uncompetitive nowadays. only families with >= 2 kids would consider about it but it is
1. 15% price hike comparing with last generation end 3 year ago.
2. 2.4T engine is not smooth as the traditional v6.
3. made in US bring quite a bit small quality problems such as bad door seal or floor carpet.
4. cheap interiors.
4. hybird is good but u have to wait for couple of months first.
5. no price negotiation
6. bad customer service and rude dealers
I would say Kia Sorento or second-hand within 3 years LexusRX/MazdaCX9 are much better choice.
Typical Toyota uninspiring looks and interior 50 shades of grey. Also Matt start calling fake leather what it is ie: vinyl.
Haha, there’s no pleasing people. Some people just want it to be called fake leather. Others want it to be called vegan leather. Others vinyl. Others pleather. Or manmade materials. Sheeeeesh.
It's not Vinyl, its a blended articificla mix of materials, it also has more durability than Vinyl ever had.
@351tgv
It's still sweaty crap.Leather is the best for durability and comfort. I would rather cloth seats than vynal.
@@buncha5651 - I will somewhat agree that leather is great, but what I really like is microsuede with leather bolsters, that said there are some synthetic leather materials which are also nearly as good (initially) as leather, Toyota "softext" is actually great as they can have both heated and cooled seating options.
Kia Hyundai over Toyota? Hell no Toyota is the most reliable. I purchased this vehicle in the platinum trim with the caramel leather interior. This car is more luxurious than my Lexus.
Cool! glad you love it
I bet it hasnt got a torque converter auto. Hope it has a spare wheel. Just looked up the specifications 2.4 turbo is an 8 speed real auto transmission, but $71,000 for the GXL with vinyl seats. Way overpriced I wouldn't buy.
Yep. It has a TC 8-speed auto (pretty good) and a space saver.
@@therightcar
Still way overpriced and ugly.
Haha Matt. Santa Fe must come from Bentley at that price!! 😂
Im not buying Santa fe for $446050
Hahahahaha I know, it was a typo!
Pity we don't get the Grand Highlander here. Much better looking, more room, better engine options. This model Kluger is a letdown.
Given the skyrocketed fuel price today, a non-hybrid car is only favourable if you live in the regional area and drive on the highway only for commute.
No, hybrid not worth it , if do low mileage inner city or suburb driving, would not make back the extra cost for the hybrid in fuel savings
@@daweigo6851 Hybrids are more efficient in city driving conditions, much more so than regular petrols. On the highway, it’s negligible but hybrid will probably be ever so slightly more efficient as electric motors take some stress off the engine by acting as ‘helpers’ in a sense. Probably not that noticeable though. For city driving, hybrid is 110% better. However, ur point of doing low mileage making the hybrid not worth it is valid. And moreover, there’s no point buying a hybrid if u barely drive or do very low mileage. U will end up with more problems if anything (if stored for extended periods).
@@daweigo6851 It is not only about cost, as the driving experience also costs something, which is sometimes priceless. The electrified vehicle (hybrid, plug-in hybrid and EV) is so agile, giving you much more fun to drive in the urban area.
@@austin.2716 Sure, driving less than 5, 000 km annually means not owning a car is a better option.
@@acde9355 Not entirely sure what u mean but I was simply comparing hybrids and regular petrol vehicles to each other.
Too expensive for non plug in ev. An outlander would be smaller but would be winning in operating cost alone. Either that or a Chery Tigo 8 Pro e+ later down the track.
You wouldnt put anything in the third row apart from toddlers
You can't put toddlers in there because there are no child-seat anchor points.
Nope. Toyota's are bland. The Kia for the money and features. The Santa Fe is ugly the new upcoming one is cool looking.
For a company the size of Toyota the interior and dashboard design is just not up to scratch... Ugly, oddly shaped and shiny plastics. Lazy design compared to the new and OLD industry competitors ...