And that is a bad change made good. I never though I would like an emotional Sherlock Holmes. But surprisingly they handled him pretty well in this movie.
Honestly one of the most incredible looking films ive seen in a bit, the textures on the foliage,clothes, books, dust filmed rooms, and dank streets, felt and looked amazing. Feast for the eyes.
But Millie Bobbi brown has to film Stranger Things too and we all know that the forth season it’s not going to be the last one so it would be complicated for her to be filming two series at a time
I love the fact that Enola and Sherlock we're starting to grow closer. I am a big fan of Sherlock Holmes movies and TV series and didn't know nothing about Enola Holmes so I really like this and how it was played out.
It does seem like they've chosen to alter the Sherlock character to make him more enjoyable and to set this up as a Caville/Brown franchise. It's a good choice. Everyone likes Sherlock, so it's smart to make him a likable character, whereas Mycroft is the character you love to hate. It was a very enjoyable movie, loved the cinematography. I hope the Marquess pops up from time to time in the future films.
he has shown strom emotions for a few people ..but imo this is justmore gender politics and fucking up the orignal works even the women who played the mum said she loved the role as it was a big F**K you to Holmes
@@simoncox9689 "A big F**k you to Holmes", what an idiotic remark! After Robert Downey Jr, Cumberbatch and Sir Ian McKellan I think Holmes should be treated with respect more then ever.
A well-done film. A film that delivers a lot on it’s first entry; it definitely sets up for a franchise but doesn’t save everything for the sequels to draw it out like many other franchises.
I hope that they keep all the same actors in the future series. I think they are all perfect. Tewksbury looks like a teenage Keanu and Henry Cavil is great as Sherlock. Can't wait for the next ones!
Right maxime😅 and I was thinking "why does she looks so familiar?" they aged and now I feel old too☺️ I swear the generation now is missing something great
@@cFatoss i had the same thing! I knew i recognised her from something but i Just couldn't figure out from what till i looked it up 😅 and sameee 😭 i watched Since i was a kid
I'm a romantic so of course the romance between Enola and the Marquess is the best tweak they've done in this film. I hope to see more of them together in the future films or better yet just serve us a series please! :)
In the books, Enola does talk directly to the reader when at times she will begin a sentence like: "Let me spare you, gentle reader, the wheedling, soothing...it took me to..."
Bruce Burns It's been a bit of time since I last read the series, but I do think that the 4th wall breaking was a lot more prevalent in the later novels compared to the first book. The movie does this a lot, but I think the books do not break the fourth wall as much, to the point where one might even forget that it occurred when reminiscing about the series.
@@longliveplanetawesome3223 Well that gives me an idea. I'm just about to start reading the series again and I will count the number of times Enola addresses the reader directly. The only writing I will count will be when Enola directly addresses the "gentle reader" to offer an explanation. Technically speaking since the books are written in the first person you could argue that Enola is always addressing the reader but that's taking it a bit far.
The only negative thing about that movie was how she was breaking the fourth wall, I couldn’t get involved in the storyline due to that, but the movie is actually good.
Loved the movie and how Enola brought out Sherlock's more caring side more and more through-out the movie in contrast to Mycroft who couldn't care less and was happy at the end to be rid of her..
In the books, he has a disdain for all women with the exception of Irene Adler, who outsmarts him in “A Scandal in Bohemia”. He always refers to her as “That Woman”.
@@mborok sorry for my word choice. He disdain woman cause he's hard to understand them especially their emotion. We know he doesn't like include emotion. Except Irene, she tricks him with her logic. I remember he also impress with her clien, Violet.
I have mixed feelings about 'fan fiction' sequels. This looks like it could be fun but why, oh why, oh why, are there so many stories where the cool girl hates sewing? I'd have thought that when she was on the run it would have been handy for Enola to be able to sew up or at least repair her own clothes.
I loved it, and I can not wait for more even if we have not had the green light for more I want more, I love this side of Sherlock, it nice to see a caring sherlock with a human side for one and not a cocky drugged up sherlock
I would also add that the film worse fits in the original universe(ACD books). There are more mentions of dates in the Nancy Springer's books, it's 1880-s, and we know that Holmes very active in 1880-s. There are also some mentions of Watson in Springer's books(including even his abduction in third book), but there are no in the film, moreover, there are many phrases like "Holmes works alone", "You have no friends" in the film, but he is famous there, so it might be that there is no Watson in film's universe at all. However, I wouldn't say that both Enola film and books are good at showing us Holmes' character. But it is ok, it is the good fanfiction, and fanfiction shouldn't be a copy of original. What about Enola Holmes, it is a good and interesting film, and I'd like to watch the sequel💖 Millie did a fantastic job
My only issue is how the movies will work with the messed up timeline in the future....and if they decide to do the last book how they will address what happens to her mom. Or if that plot point will be completely removed and replaced with that weird radical suffrage plot. In the books, Enola meets Watson's wife....The issue with that is that Watson gets married in 1888 and the first movie had to take place earlier due to the Law Tewky had to help pass. Guess we will have to see.
Some points from the second book are put in the film, such as the meeting at the British museum and perhaps the garrotting attacker. I hope they bring in Cecily, even if Tewksbury fills some of her role as kindred spirit companion. The laugh when Ebola outwitted Sherlock could have been taken from a scene when she more soundly tricks him in the second book. It would be great if that were included in the next film, but it would make less sense if Sherlock isn’t still trying to trap her. Maybe she’ll do it to Mycroft instead.
Thank you! All the things that did not make sense in the movie that really irked me turns out to be things that the film maker added. It all makes sense now!
I found the film fun and a refreshing take on the Sherlock Holmes mythos. I for one have somewhat got tired of the usual portrayal of Sherlock as an eccentric intellectual bully like Robert Downey Jr.'s version (Although that one is my favorite), or at worst the atrocious and godawful horrible "High functioning Sociopath" version of the BBC's Sherlock (Which is the worst version of Holmes put to film). While it's hard to see super swole Geralt of Rivia as Sherlock Holmes, I was pleasantly surprised. I haven't seen Millie Bobby Brown in anything before this so I was also very surprised as how greatly she carried this film.
Finding out the movie is greatly different from the book is not as disappointing now seeing how little the book characters had to emotionally connect to. this Enola is someone young girls can look up to and the reform voters rights bill plot is pretty good imo. This Enola gives young girls a good message to take their future in their hands and Sherlock has been played by many actors so Ofcourse they would try a different angle this time around. I don’t get why people are fussed, it’s just story telling & I personally loved him in this movie
You really shouldn't use the term 'gypsy' anymore. It's considered a slur to the Romani people and is an inaccurate name for them at best (it originated from the fact people through they came from Egypt, when in fact the Romani people were originally from India).
So let's alter history. That's what everyone knew them by in the age setting of the film. To me bought up in the west end int the 40s that what they were called.
Kleineganz Not my background, but I’ve been told by those with better knowledge that it depends on the region the community is from. Some communities use the term, others quite adamantly will not, my personal opinion is that I would leave it up to the different communities to determine what is acceptable, rather than me assuming. Also, it could be that the narrator is paraphrasing the book, i.e. the book itself used the term, in which case we cannot really fault the narrator.
@@ellieshaw8566 Yes, that's fine because of the period the books are set in. That doesn't mean the person in this video should be using the term though.
I watched the movie and I wonder if there was a deleted scene at the end of the movie where the villain cop tries to choke the main character enola holmes?
Oh my god.. I never read the books but from this, all the things I disliked about the movie were changes.. Ha!.. guess I have some reading to do.. looks like I'll enjoy it way more than I did this movie..
The movie was good but Cavill was not the right choice for Sherlock. He's too charming and handsome. Sherlock is more disinterested in polished looks and is more nerdy (for lack of a better word) looking.
I saw someone comment that they do like Cavill as Sherlock, and that they think the only situation Cavill's Sherlock would work would be in Enola Holmes, as this is a story about Enola, from her perspective, and she looks up to Sherlock as a charming hero rather than a nerdy anti-social guy
Okay, yikes. I wasn't sure if I wanted to watch this, but the nonsensical costuming and your description of Sherlock clinches it. No. Such an emphatic no! Why use the character of Holmes, if.... you're basically *not* going to use the character of Holmes? That's like using Pollyanna in your movie, but she's an alcoholic nihilist. Why?
Styling yourself as "Sherlock Holmes" doesn't make you one, all the more so if you don't even try to stay close to the original character in any capacity. It's bad form, borrowing another's fame (but admitedly free, and so cheaper) to present a story you don't have any confidence would be good or well received on its own. Afraid that asimple "Enola, [new property] teenage free thinking detective" may not have stood on its own merit? May have failed badly without the power of a well established franchise to back it up and serve as a foil to glorify the new character in contrast? But it would have been more intelectualy and morally honest instead of a Netflix business calculated venture the like of wich we can find a dozen a dime. The movie may even be good but the discrepancies between the Sherlock Holmes portrayed there and the one I have fixed in my mind is putting me off... a shame, since I like the actors playing in it. (I just watched 12 minutes into it before feeling a need to dissipate the bad taste, and will go back dubbing the characters as Brit Big Bro 1 and Brit Big Bro 2 or 3B1 and 3B2 instead) *Edit: now, having calmed down and seen it, I'd say it was enjoyable: good cinematography, costumes,, awesome actors, some of whom are a bit wasted on too small a role like Helena Bonham Carter. But it was not nearly clever enough for a Holme's story, although still pretending to be (and their version of Holmes is good natured enough to take their attempt at belittling him with grace). But after dissmissing all about that Holme's business weighing me down; I can say: Enola found enough of a balance between clever and clumsy, militant and self conscious, to not feel like it was hammering (too) forcefully some of its ideas to the audience instead of letting them decide on their own by showing their point (rather than sometimes not so subtly telling it to you)... The ending proved that of either choices, making noise or making friends, the later will always be the better option, and I can wholefully get behind that. I was a bit afraid to see another woman's empowerment story wich morals would be that a strong woman should be the worst man she can be... wich is really an awfull and stupid idea. Being yourself is not a supposed to be a competition with others, but an inner struggle between your limitations vs your aspirations.
Hey Movie Lovers, what were your favourite moments in Enola Holmes? 😍🕵️♀️🔎
Was there anything you didn't like?
i started a petition for a sequel! chng.it/BqpNzh6598
the scene i liked the most is when enola went in search of louis ppatridge and he gives her flowers
Flicks And The City that i knew that Enola/Millie’s brother is sherlock
I didn't like how she and the marquess entered her room. Like the two of them. How indecent! 1890's NSFW. :D
I love he look on the school owners face when they take her car 😂 That picture though 👍😂
I loved the little laugh of Sherlock while walking away from the police station. Perfect
Ha!
Enola Holmes had shown the emotional side of Holmes.
And that is a bad change made good. I never though I would like an emotional Sherlock Holmes. But surprisingly they handled him pretty well in this movie.
Yeah he was kinda an asshole in the books
Honestly one of the most incredible looking films ive seen in a bit, the textures on the foliage,clothes, books, dust filmed rooms, and dank streets, felt and looked amazing. Feast for the eyes.
Digital cameras.
@@Alexagrigorieff textures where blowing my mind
I loved the movie but I rly felt it was one that could’ve easily been fleshed out as a series!!! I would’ve totally watched
It will be a film series hopefully
Omg I was thinking the same
But Millie Bobbi brown has to film Stranger Things too and we all know that the forth season it’s not going to be the last one so it would be complicated for her to be filming two series at a time
I love the fact that Enola and Sherlock we're starting to grow closer.
I am a big fan of Sherlock Holmes movies and TV series and didn't know nothing about Enola Holmes so I really like this and how it was played out.
You didn't know anything about her because nothing here is canon. it's fan fiction. Doyle is public domain now, aka free real estate.
@@csillakaszas7285 facts.
It does seem like they've chosen to alter the Sherlock character to make him more enjoyable and to set this up as a Caville/Brown franchise. It's a good choice. Everyone likes Sherlock, so it's smart to make him a likable character, whereas Mycroft is the character you love to hate. It was a very enjoyable movie, loved the cinematography. I hope the Marquess pops up from time to time in the future films.
He better!
Enola is the only person sherlock has shown emotions to
he has shown strom emotions for a few people ..but imo this is justmore gender politics and fucking up the orignal works even the women who played the mum said she loved the role as it was a big F**K you to Holmes
@@simoncox9689 "A big F**k you to Holmes", what an idiotic remark! After Robert Downey Jr, Cumberbatch and Sir Ian McKellan I think Holmes should be treated with respect more then ever.
A well-done film. A film that delivers a lot on it’s first entry; it definitely sets up for a franchise but doesn’t save everything for the sequels to draw it out like many other franchises.
I hope that they keep all the same actors in the future series. I think they are all perfect. Tewksbury looks like a teenage Keanu and Henry Cavil is great as Sherlock. Can't wait for the next ones!
cuz he is a teenage
when she talks to the camera it really do be giving me dora vibes
It’s called breaking 4th wall, talking to your audience also used "Deadpool" movie. It's a montage technique.
@@naymularafat3352 except Deadpool did it better. This 4th wall breaking happens way too frequently, and comes out of nowhere
@@dillonohlemiller9027 Yeah I don't disagree Deadpool definitely did better. But it wasn’t bad either in this film.
I really enjoyed the movie, especially the talking to the camera & the fact there are 3 Harry Potter actresses in it 😍
Bellatrix, Petunia & Madam Maxine 🙌
@@FantasticBeasts2024 oh thx i just realized that was Madame Maxime*
@@FantasticBeasts2024 yess 😍
Right maxime😅 and I was thinking "why does she looks so familiar?" they aged and now I feel old too☺️ I swear the generation now is missing something great
@@cFatoss i had the same thing! I knew i recognised her from something but i Just couldn't figure out from what till i looked it up 😅 and sameee 😭 i watched Since i was a kid
I really do love the changes they make everything to much more fun
I'm a romantic so of course the romance between Enola and the Marquess is the best tweak they've done in this film. I hope to see more of them together in the future films or better yet just serve us a series please! :)
In the books, Enola does talk directly to the reader when at times she will begin a sentence like: "Let me spare you, gentle reader, the wheedling, soothing...it took me to..."
Bruce Burns
It's been a bit of time since I last read the series, but I do think that the 4th wall breaking was a lot more prevalent in the later novels compared to the first book. The movie does this a lot, but I think the books do not break the fourth wall as much, to the point where one might even forget that it occurred when reminiscing about the series.
@@longliveplanetawesome3223 Well that gives me an idea. I'm just about to start reading the series again and I will count the number of times Enola addresses the reader directly. The only writing I will count will be when Enola directly addresses the "gentle reader" to offer an explanation. Technically speaking since the books are written in the first person you could argue that Enola is always addressing the reader but that's taking it a bit far.
I love the choice to break the 4th wall! Makes it distinct from the other detective movies.
The only negative thing about that movie was how she was breaking the fourth wall, I couldn’t get involved in the storyline due to that, but the movie is actually good.
Same, I cringed but I understand why they took that direction.
Loved the movie and how Enola brought out Sherlock's more caring side more and more through-out the movie in contrast to Mycroft who couldn't care less and was happy at the end to be rid of her..
I feel the movie added more stuff to the mystery and Made it deeper and more interesting
I have three things I hate now. Gunpowder, Mycroft isn't genius, and people who said Sherlock hates woman.
In the books, he has a disdain for all women with the exception of Irene Adler, who outsmarts him in “A Scandal in Bohemia”. He always refers to her as “That Woman”.
@@mborok he doesn't hate them, he just doesn't like them because woman is complicated to understand especially for his logic.
@@alfiyahatika6986 I said disdain, not hate.
@@mborok sorry for my word choice. He disdain woman cause he's hard to understand them especially their emotion. We know he doesn't like include emotion. Except Irene, she tricks him with her logic. I remember he also impress with her clien, Violet.
I have mixed feelings about 'fan fiction' sequels. This looks like it could be fun but why, oh why, oh why, are there so many stories where the cool girl hates sewing? I'd have thought that when she was on the run it would have been handy for Enola to be able to sew up or at least repair her own clothes.
I loved it, and I can not wait for more even if we have not had the green light for more I want more, I love this side of Sherlock, it nice to see a caring sherlock with a human side for one and not a cocky drugged up sherlock
Literally my favorite movie EVER!!!!! ❤️❤️ I wish they would make Elona Holmes a series 💕
I would also add that the film worse fits in the original universe(ACD books). There are more mentions of dates in the Nancy Springer's books, it's 1880-s, and we know that Holmes very active in 1880-s. There are also some mentions of Watson in Springer's books(including even his abduction in third book), but there are no in the film, moreover, there are many phrases like "Holmes works alone", "You have no friends" in the film, but he is famous there, so it might be that there is no Watson in film's universe at all.
However, I wouldn't say that both Enola film and books are good at showing us Holmes' character. But it is ok, it is the good fanfiction, and fanfiction shouldn't be a copy of original.
What about Enola Holmes, it is a good and interesting film, and I'd like to watch the sequel💖 Millie did a fantastic job
The beginning of this movie strongly reminded me of the Flavia deLuce novels of Alan Bradley. Books that I strongly recommend.
My only issue is how the movies will work with the messed up timeline in the future....and if they decide to do the last book how they will address what happens to her mom. Or if that plot point will be completely removed and replaced with that weird radical suffrage plot.
In the books, Enola meets Watson's wife....The issue with that is that Watson gets married in 1888 and the first movie had to take place earlier due to the Law Tewky had to help pass.
Guess we will have to see.
Some points from the second book are put in the film, such as the meeting at the British museum and perhaps the garrotting attacker. I hope they bring in Cecily, even if Tewksbury fills some of her role as kindred spirit companion. The laugh when Ebola outwitted Sherlock could have been taken from a scene when she more soundly tricks him in the second book. It would be great if that were included in the next film, but it would make less sense if Sherlock isn’t still trying to trap her. Maybe she’ll do it to Mycroft instead.
Thank you! All the things that did not make sense in the movie that really irked me turns out to be things that the film maker added. It all makes sense now!
The weird thing about Enola is, She talks to the camera. Haha. Shes like Dora the Explorer.
She's like that in the books lol
I like it. Kinda like Deadpool.
I read the first book first. It was so lovely to see Enola come to life.
Woop woop! We get a series!!!
I found the film fun and a refreshing take on the Sherlock Holmes mythos.
I for one have somewhat got tired of the usual portrayal of Sherlock as an eccentric intellectual bully like Robert Downey Jr.'s version (Although that one is my favorite), or at worst the atrocious and godawful horrible "High functioning Sociopath" version of the BBC's Sherlock (Which is the worst version of Holmes put to film).
While it's hard to see super swole Geralt of Rivia as Sherlock Holmes, I was pleasantly surprised.
I haven't seen Millie Bobby Brown in anything before this so I was also very surprised as how greatly she carried this film.
Hi Jan, you should try watching "Julie and the Phantoms"! It has a lot of cool Easter Eggs!! :)
I watched this movie last night, and all I'm gonna say is the fact she breaks the fourth wall is painful.
I love the movies and I hope for sequels💖👑
Ok
I enjoyed the movie!! great casts!!
I loved it!
Finding out the movie is greatly different from the book is not as disappointing now seeing how little the book characters had to emotionally connect to. this Enola is someone young girls can look up to and the reform voters rights bill plot is pretty good imo. This Enola gives young girls a good message to take their future in their hands and Sherlock has been played by many actors so Ofcourse they would try a different angle this time around. I don’t get why people are fussed, it’s just story telling & I personally loved him in this movie
You really shouldn't use the term 'gypsy' anymore. It's considered a slur to the Romani people and is an inaccurate name for them at best (it originated from the fact people through they came from Egypt, when in fact the Romani people were originally from India).
So let's alter history. That's what everyone knew them by in the age setting of the film. To me bought up in the west end int the 40s that what they were called.
Kleineganz Not my background, but I’ve been told by those with better knowledge that it depends on the region the community is from. Some communities use the term, others quite adamantly will not, my personal opinion is that I would leave it up to the different communities to determine what is acceptable, rather than me assuming. Also, it could be that the narrator is paraphrasing the book, i.e. the book itself used the term, in which case we cannot really fault the narrator.
The book consistently calls them gypsy's because that's what they were called then. That's just being historically accurate.
@@ellieshaw8566 Yes, that's fine because of the period the books are set in. That doesn't mean the person in this video should be using the term though.
I could go either way. It's not great that she's using it, but given the context, I think it's easily forgiven.
I watched the movie and I wonder if there was a deleted scene at the end of the movie where the villain cop tries to choke the main character enola holmes?
I LOVE ENOLA HOLMES
Without having read the books and only from what they show in the film, it seems to me that they aim to make the mother the villain in the end.
Where can I read all adventure of her? I am curious
Only lucky people have a good bond with thier siblings
I didn't like that the movie ended... :D
Does anyone has the illustrated books?
Hi
Hi, 👍 for being early!
Oh my god.. I never read the books but from this, all the things I disliked about the movie were changes.. Ha!.. guess I have some reading to do.. looks like I'll enjoy it way more than I did this movie..
Tenola romance...
me a Filipino
First
To like my own comment
Who else has read the book and really freaking hated the movie
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
11 - I saw what you did there
First but no one cares teheee! love the movie, its awesome
Somebody has to care ;-)
Worst bit was the shogun scenes was like watching baddy in a 007 film trying kill 007 lol
Tenola HAHAHAHAHA im sorry. Any Filipino fans here?
i never subbed to you why does it say i did
Bots
"Pinecone dog" I'm sure it's called a hedgehog
The movie was good but Cavill was not the right choice for Sherlock. He's too charming and handsome. Sherlock is more disinterested in polished looks and is more nerdy (for lack of a better word) looking.
I saw someone comment that they do like Cavill as Sherlock, and that they think the only situation Cavill's Sherlock would work would be in Enola Holmes, as this is a story about Enola, from her perspective, and she looks up to Sherlock as a charming hero rather than a nerdy anti-social guy
MinorAccident very good point!
THE BOOKS ARE BETTER
Okay, yikes. I wasn't sure if I wanted to watch this, but the nonsensical costuming and your description of Sherlock clinches it. No. Such an emphatic no! Why use the character of Holmes, if.... you're basically *not* going to use the character of Holmes? That's like using Pollyanna in your movie, but she's an alcoholic nihilist. Why?
Styling yourself as "Sherlock Holmes" doesn't make you one, all the more so if you don't even try to stay close to the original character in any capacity.
It's bad form, borrowing another's fame (but admitedly free, and so cheaper) to present a story you don't have any confidence would be good or well received on its own.
Afraid that asimple "Enola, [new property] teenage free thinking detective" may not have stood on its own merit? May have failed badly without the power of a well established franchise to back it up and serve as a foil to glorify the new character in contrast?
But it would have been more intelectualy and morally honest instead of a Netflix business calculated venture the like of wich we can find a dozen a dime.
The movie may even be good but the discrepancies between the Sherlock Holmes portrayed there and the one I have fixed in my mind is putting me off... a shame, since I like the actors playing in it.
(I just watched 12 minutes into it before feeling a need to dissipate the bad taste, and will go back dubbing the characters as Brit Big Bro 1 and Brit Big Bro 2 or 3B1 and 3B2 instead)
*Edit: now, having calmed down and seen it,
I'd say it was enjoyable: good cinematography, costumes,, awesome actors, some of whom are a bit wasted on too small a role like Helena Bonham Carter. But it was not nearly clever enough for a Holme's story, although still pretending to be (and their version of Holmes is good natured enough to take their attempt at belittling him with grace). But after dissmissing all about that Holme's business weighing me down; I can say:
Enola found enough of a balance between clever and clumsy, militant and self conscious, to not feel like it was hammering (too) forcefully some of its ideas to the audience instead of letting them decide on their own by showing their point (rather than sometimes not so subtly telling it to you)...
The ending proved that of either choices, making noise or making friends, the later will always be the better option, and I can wholefully get behind that.
I was a bit afraid to see another woman's empowerment story wich morals would be that a strong woman should be the worst man she can be... wich is really an awfull and stupid idea. Being yourself is not a supposed to be a competition with others, but an inner struggle between your limitations vs your aspirations.
Worst talking to the camera 🤬🤬🤬
That's what maked the movie more unique, more different than the others. It's a hard thing to do but Millie Nailed it soooo
Like Emmanuel says, it's a very hard acting technique to get right. Personally I thought she was great, but a lot of people don't like it in general.
What do you mean? It's so in character
Actually, I hated the movie. To me was a big cringe.