The problems with infinity in QM

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 дек 2024

Комментарии • 10

  • @TheMemesofDestruction
    @TheMemesofDestruction Месяц назад

    🔥

  • @samirk.2104
    @samirk.2104 Месяц назад

    Perhaps you’re looking for something like the kroneker product of two matrices?

    • @AssumptionsofPhysicsResearch
      @AssumptionsofPhysicsResearch  22 дня назад

      I am not sure what this refers to... For the uncertainty during Hamiltonian evolution? If it works out like that, it would be great! :-D

    • @samirk.2104
      @samirk.2104 21 день назад

      @ For how to multiply covariances. the kroneker product is a way of multiplying matrices with different dimensions. It comes up in ML applications. It gives you a block structure (according to Wikipedia), which you said you were looking for.
      I mention it because there are specific applications to covariances. They are referred to as ‘Kroneker structured covariances’ or ‘Kroneker product structured covariances’.

    • @AssumptionsofPhysicsResearch
      @AssumptionsofPhysicsResearch  21 день назад

      @@samirk.2104 That does look close! How familiar are you with those structures? Would it be worth it to have a discussion and see if they actually fit with what I need?

    • @samirk.2104
      @samirk.2104 19 дней назад

      @ probably not, they just came up in my reading so i did some digging.

    • @AssumptionsofPhysicsResearch
      @AssumptionsofPhysicsResearch  15 дней назад

      @@samirk.2104 Thanks for the pointer anyway! Adding to the infinite list of things to look at! 😀

  • @AHXIOMLaEscueladelaimaginacion
    @AHXIOMLaEscueladelaimaginacion 25 дней назад

    Hello, Prof. Carcassi.
    This "point of view" is verey interesting:
    ruclips.net/video/7oWip00iXbo/видео.htmlsi=eA9YsKnJ9va78TwV
    And is all about what I have talking from 2001 to now.

    • @AssumptionsofPhysicsResearch
      @AssumptionsofPhysicsResearch  22 дня назад

      A specific point of the interview, or the whole thing?

    • @AHXIOMLaEscueladelaimaginacion
      @AHXIOMLaEscueladelaimaginacion 22 дня назад

      @AssumptionsofPhysicsResearch Hello. The whole as "how we solve this mess?" Answer: look to all in a different way, manner. The specific: There is a "deep point" in the cannon bottom, where the 2 was joint, there are no lore 2 walls. And, as has been shown in my work, the math for that "no walls place= point" can be "writed" in other maths snd geometruñy, an after Hilbert type. If there is No Two, a "close to" pythagorean snd platonic "theory and model" can be obtained and, from 2001 to now there is one where walls between geometry and "numbers based in sets based in classes ot types based in cathegories" do not need "that mess". It is why because, eaven with out my personal "deductions and possible abdcuntions" about the model You belive "is so far fron yout work", with an "aproach" closer to the "observed" in the video interview, the "possible viable model and its theory" becomes more clear, les "mess.ed" and viable.
      I hope You want to send me another email with specific questions between AHXIOM tgeory and model and the theory and model on the video interview.
      Tks & Best regards.