Deriving the Arc Length in Cartesian and Polar Coordinates

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 фев 2025

Комментарии • 132

  • @luchisevera1808
    @luchisevera1808 6 лет назад +198

    Some people were straight before they found your channel

    • @PhasmidTutorials
      @PhasmidTutorials 6 лет назад +1

      haha XD

    • @Cashman9111
      @Cashman9111 6 лет назад +16

      so you saying he is so ugly that he turns girls into lesbians ? dude, that's rude

    • @orangesite7625
      @orangesite7625 2 года назад +2

      @@Cashman9111 no turns dudes to dudees

    • @DendrocnideMoroides
      @DendrocnideMoroides 2 года назад

      @@Cashman9111 maybe that means he is so handsome that he turns men into gays

  • @lumek4513
    @lumek4513 6 лет назад +66

    I zoomed in very very close and now I'm straight! Thanks papa!

  • @AndrewDotsonvideos
    @AndrewDotsonvideos 5 лет назад +66

    Now I want to do this for curved spacetime.

    • @Ricocossa1
      @Ricocossa1 5 лет назад +5

      If you define your manifold with a metric then it's practically in the definition. If you start from a connection and no metric, then you can't (unless you assume metric compatibility)

    • @parameshwarhazra2725
      @parameshwarhazra2725 4 года назад +1

      This is what a physicist really likes to do😀

    • @tomkerruish2982
      @tomkerruish2982 3 года назад

      Get a load of this guy!

  • @omarino99
    @omarino99 6 лет назад +60

    Once again Leibnitz notation proves its superiority.

    • @tianvlasic
      @tianvlasic 6 лет назад

      Well, if you zoom in everything is straight😂😂😂

  • @danteduane9342
    @danteduane9342 6 лет назад +21

    I'M NOT STRAIGHT
    * sees video *
    OK MAYBE I'M STRAIGHT

  • @OscarMtz88
    @OscarMtz88 6 лет назад +2

    what are the odds that literally today I was assigned to derive arc length in polar coordinates for hw, I love you

    • @rot6015
      @rot6015 6 лет назад +1

      I don't know you, but we have the same taste in music.

  • @antonbordwine
    @antonbordwine 4 года назад +1

    1:16 Awaapabaund 😍🥰

  • @OtiumAbscondita
    @OtiumAbscondita 6 лет назад +79

    Oh boi I love this homophobic humor

    • @mononix5224
      @mononix5224 5 лет назад +3

      please give me your definition of homophobia and not the one made up by second rate humies (i.e. SJWs)

    • @baguettegott3409
      @baguettegott3409 5 лет назад +4

      ​@@mononix5224 Aversion to and discriminations against homosexuality/homosexual people? What is the "made up" one? Because all definitions are made up by somebody...

    • @quantumbracket6995
      @quantumbracket6995 4 года назад +5

      *Homomorphic

  • @brechtbollaert8187
    @brechtbollaert8187 4 года назад +2

    May i just say... you are legendary! Love all your meme sentences hahaha

  • @DavidPumpernickel
    @DavidPumpernickel 4 года назад +1

    lol i watched this last week, here i am again, because deriving arclength in polar coords is a homework problem. big happy :'D

  • @atrimandal4324
    @atrimandal4324 6 лет назад +11

    Okay, this is epic❤️👌
    More Physics 😂😂

  • @paulg444
    @paulg444 4 года назад +2

    great to see a young man just being himself !!

  • @yeast4529
    @yeast4529 6 лет назад +4

    Great timing papa flammy, I was about to try and manually reverse my sexuality without any help

  • @christopherhorton1995
    @christopherhorton1995 6 лет назад

    This is perfect timing papa, we just learned about arc length in class today. Thank you my boi

  • @tuggspeedman1359
    @tuggspeedman1359 6 лет назад +1

    You explain what your doing really well.

  • @hendrik2765
    @hendrik2765 6 лет назад +9

    10:15 good that it is the same Spiel ^^

  • @gvcallen
    @gvcallen 4 года назад +2

    Great video! Do you have a video formalizing the concept of "playing physicist" i.e. some sort of rigorous proof that we can "always" formulate proofs using dy's, dx's etc. without the need to mess around with Riemann sums and limits?

  • @pepperonisalad2304
    @pepperonisalad2304 6 лет назад +6

    First. Definitely first.
    And this finally seems like within my area of current knowledge!

  • @engr.rimarc.liguan1795
    @engr.rimarc.liguan1795 5 лет назад

    Im researching the derivation of arc length for polar equations, when i found out this video. My laught on that moment. Hahahaha. Nice one 😂 i really enjoyed your video so much. Lovelots from the Philippines 😆

  • @micayahritchie7158
    @micayahritchie7158 5 лет назад +1

    Papa Flammy has mastered the sacred ancient art of the Chen Lu

  • @asbjrnandersen4765
    @asbjrnandersen4765 6 лет назад

    Who ever said germans don't have humor??? AJAHAHA that fucking killed me

  • @deemotion
    @deemotion 6 лет назад

    OMG PAPA FLAMMY! IT'S WAS AMAZING!

  • @loukafortin6225
    @loukafortin6225 5 лет назад

    Could you show us the contour special case from the beginning nextly?

  • @tomkerruish2982
    @tomkerruish2982 3 года назад

    9:15 I believe you confused theta with t. Shouldn't it be x(t) = r(t) cos(theta(t)) usw.?

  • @deemotion
    @deemotion 6 лет назад

    A true trip. Thank you so much

  • @9Banda6
    @9Banda6 4 года назад

    Question: Shouldn't you say theta(r) in the argument of the trig functions when converting from cartesian to polar? The reason why I say this is because in polar sometimes the angle changes as well.

  • @diszno20
    @diszno20 5 лет назад

    Papa! When substituting the Cartesian coords with the polar ones shouldn't they be x ( t ) = r(t) * cos ( theta( t ) ) and likewise y ( t ) = r (t ) * sin ( theta ( t ) ) ? Luv ur videos, keep up the good work!

  • @mariomuysensual
    @mariomuysensual 4 года назад

    Papa I have a question, where does the integration limits move for the polar coordinates?

  • @rayvianasampaio379
    @rayvianasampaio379 4 года назад +1

    Guten Tag meister Sholze ; *please show us how is the Lagrangian formulation , if the fixed limits are not points in two dimensions ; but are lines in the three dimensional space*
    *In this case , what would be the """ minimum sheet """???*
    I would be very gratefull .
    Greetings from Brazil !!!
    Ray Viana Sampaio .

  • @Mot-dh5sx
    @Mot-dh5sx 6 лет назад

    Cool, but can you solve the integral from 0 to infinity of 1/(x^n + 1)? I started trying it.
    Dunno if this helps but I have a contour that’s a sector with angle 2*pi*n/2 with radius R as it approaches infinity. It’s not as messy as I thought.

  • @Everth97
    @Everth97 5 лет назад

    Shouldn't x(t) and y(t) functions of r(t) and theta(t)? Like r(t)*cos(theta(t))?? @flammie

  • @polaris_babylon
    @polaris_babylon 6 лет назад +1

    Have you used Riemannian manifold to define this things?

  • @mostafaahmednasr621
    @mostafaahmednasr621 6 лет назад +5

    When i grow up i dont want to get the rank of sir or doctor but i want to get the rank of PAPA

  • @yumi-bv7gf
    @yumi-bv7gf 3 года назад

    why the arc length formula( cartesian form) cannot be used to find the arc length

  • @minafawzy5086
    @minafawzy5086 4 года назад +1

    What is delta L. Shouldn't it be just L. The length is the space cut from a point to another. So, what you call delta L is the length and not the change in it.

  • @denisyilmaz8968
    @denisyilmaz8968 5 лет назад

    So r is the vector to any point on the curve?

  • @EmissaryOfSmeagol
    @EmissaryOfSmeagol 6 лет назад +1

    Charlie: :P
    Papa: "I'm looking at you my boy"
    Charlie: :o

    • @Ensivion
      @Ensivion 6 лет назад +2

      The face when you're gay and named charlie watching papa flammy D:

    • @Ensivion
      @Ensivion 6 лет назад +1

      @@PapaFlammy69 lol I have a rare-ish name, it was just really surprising. the subset of people must be very small: gay, named charlie, interested in math and science.

  • @rogerjohan9621
    @rogerjohan9621 4 года назад

    I derived this result on my own when I was in 9th grade after my friend challenged me ;)

  • @sahinc8
    @sahinc8 6 лет назад

    As you said in 1:58 that we are going to do an approximation I felt like an engineer

  • @emmadurza3
    @emmadurza3 6 лет назад

    Papa flammy is kazuma!!!

  • @anilsharma-ev2my
    @anilsharma-ev2my 4 года назад

    What is triangle area when its equal to parameters of area cover by function in any interval
    ??????????
    We need to know how hypotenuse of triangle regulated its position or unit circle multiple times the area of function under any interval ?
    How unit circle area equal to function under curve in a given interval
    So we found a simple percentage ???

  • @silasrodrigues1446
    @silasrodrigues1446 6 лет назад

    Besides I think I'm still straight I love you Papa! You're one of [my] heroes!.....

  • @rot6015
    @rot6015 6 лет назад

    Thanks papa

  • @damiandassen7763
    @damiandassen7763 5 лет назад +1

    Wouldn't it be fun to make a video of deriving the formula of the arc area in Cartesian, spherical and cylindrical coordinates?

  • @apolloniuspergus9295
    @apolloniuspergus9295 6 лет назад +1

    Make a video deriving the Covariant Derivative (Riemann Geometry)

    • @Naverb
      @Naverb 5 лет назад

      That's... A bit tougher than anything this channel usually covers. A fairly easy extrinsic definition of the Covariant derivative though is to embed your manifold in R^n (carrying the tangent bundle via the embedding in the natural way) and then orthogonally project down the tangent bundle in the sense that each tangent space in R^n gets orthogonally projected down to a tangent space on the embedded manifold.
      Intrinsic definitions can be nicer to actually work with, and the most common one involves two terms: Dv/dt = dv^k/dt d/dx^k + v^i dp^j/dt Christoffel(i, j, k) d/dx^k. In the intrinsic definition, the first term is what you would get if we were working over R^n or any "flat" space, while the second term is a correction that takes into account how our space is "curved". This is important since when we define the derivative we want it to act like an infinitesimal difference quotient, but nearby tangent spaces might "twist away" from each other if our manifold is curved (think of taking a block of rubber in both hands and twisting each hand in opposite directions. The rubber becomes twisted. The technical name for this is "Torsion" and is a tensor).

  • @kaffeepause5807
    @kaffeepause5807 3 года назад

    Min 9:49 - Polar Coordinates: It´s not the chain rule but the product rule.

  • @prestonrobinson6569
    @prestonrobinson6569 6 лет назад

    Wait, you cover this in calc 1?

    • @babycreeper98
      @babycreeper98 6 лет назад

      Yea lol this was Calc three stuff for me

  • @FGj-xj7rd
    @FGj-xj7rd 6 лет назад +2

    9:43 x dot...
    🙏

  • @RieMUisthegoaT
    @RieMUisthegoaT 6 лет назад

    Oh nice! I learned about this the last week :D only 5 years left to start grasping your math knowledge
    But after 5 years you will have a 5years more knowledge than me... Oh welp at least I'm not going backwards lol
    Btw what is the rigorous relation between dl and dx,dy? I'm more interested in the rigorous way to deal with differential than actually coming up with normal formulas

  • @luis-vv3lw
    @luis-vv3lw 3 года назад

    Nice 👍🙂

  • @alberbetico10
    @alberbetico10 6 лет назад

    Wouldn't it be sqrt((r*dtheta/dt)^2 + (dr/dt)^2)?
    And... x = r(t)*cos(theta(t))
    y = r(t)*sin(theta(t))

  • @abdullasulfikkar5282
    @abdullasulfikkar5282 6 лет назад

    Hi flammy ❤❤❤

  • @tytuer
    @tytuer 5 лет назад

    I wrote same Spiel on my exam sheet. Now I am going to invade engineering faculty with a professor.

  • @jonahansen
    @jonahansen 4 года назад +1

    Not for clarification purposes, it was for obfuscation purposes.

  • @morbidmanatee5550
    @morbidmanatee5550 6 лет назад

    (Units don't match in final formula). Should be using x(t)=r(t) cos(theta(t)) -> xdot(t)=rdot(t) cos(theta(t))-r(t) sin(theta(t)) thetadot(t)

    • @badrunna-im
      @badrunna-im 5 лет назад

      You can think of t being proportional to θ, or that it's sweeping with constant angular speed.

    • @morbidmanatee5550
      @morbidmanatee5550 5 лет назад

      @@badrunna-im need angular frequency in from of the term. theta = omega * t to make it unitless ;)

  • @prestonrobinson6569
    @prestonrobinson6569 6 лет назад

    Doing this with vectors in calc 3 rn. Not a fan of the new material lol

  • @juggler3683
    @juggler3683 3 года назад

    How could dt go with the absolute value

  • @TUYUYUCUARTELERO
    @TUYUYUCUARTELERO 4 года назад

    You are funny. Good explanation. Hope RUclips don't censor your video. A fresh breath among the politically correct speeches.

  • @XanderGouws
    @XanderGouws 6 лет назад

    9:47 *product rule :p

    • @babycreeper98
      @babycreeper98 6 лет назад +1

      I only know the Chen lu no chain rule

  • @federicobondi3038
    @federicobondi3038 5 лет назад

    Am I the only one wanting him to derive something in toroidal coordinates?

  • @cameronspalding9792
    @cameronspalding9792 5 лет назад

    Shouldn’t it be theta(t)

  • @isaacstamper7798
    @isaacstamper7798 6 лет назад +1

    Are you trying to become a professor

  • @vk6297
    @vk6297 5 лет назад

    i think u r teaching in a higher level

  • @bestonyoutube
    @bestonyoutube 5 лет назад +1

    I'm gay and I find you really cute.

  • @khemirimoez8661
    @khemirimoez8661 6 лет назад

    Hi derive man

  • @keroleswael9332
    @keroleswael9332 6 лет назад +1

    If physicists approximate, why do they make fun of engineers because of this?

    • @hOREP245
      @hOREP245 6 лет назад +5

      Because stereotypically physicists approximate in a more rigorous way than engineers.

    • @robertleeshinkle8446
      @robertleeshinkle8446 6 лет назад +1

      Because we are correct 😉 A&Ω

    • @uberless1
      @uberless1 6 лет назад +3

      Because engineers shoot for +-30% so they can charge again later for the "redesign under new customer parameters" when it doesn't work. That's why engineering degrees require an Ethics class and degrees in Physics do not.

    • @luchisevera1808
      @luchisevera1808 6 лет назад +3

      Engineers approximate physicist's approximations because they test the practicality of the theory and throw out the rest. But then again looking at field theory and relativity you get some heavy approximations that drive all research centers even today

    • @pedrolourenco9520
      @pedrolourenco9520 6 лет назад

      because Pi=e=3

  • @Goku17yen
    @Goku17yen 6 лет назад +1

    lets play physicist lmao

  • @benschreyer8295
    @benschreyer8295 5 лет назад

    vruh

  • @Yellowgary
    @Yellowgary 6 лет назад

    Chen lu😂

  • @alephnull6965
    @alephnull6965 6 лет назад +1

    Soo... a circle is the gayest shape.

  • @kentmcintosh8629
    @kentmcintosh8629 5 лет назад

    Homosexuality is not something that needs to be "cured"!

    • @baguettegott3409
      @baguettegott3409 5 лет назад

      It's obviously a joke, I'm fine with the video, though the comments are confusing in parts because some come across as actually homophobic and still got a like from him - maybe it's all ironic and joking, but I feel like if the joke becomes indistinguishable from actual homophobia it might not be a good joke.

  • @parasuramvenkatesh4401
    @parasuramvenkatesh4401 4 года назад +1

    hahaha how is homosexuality even real hahaha just zoom in lol

  • @spacejunk2186
    @spacejunk2186 6 лет назад

    Lies!

  • @parameshwarhazra2725
    @parameshwarhazra2725 4 года назад

    You are skinny.

  • @yajurphullera9396
    @yajurphullera9396 6 лет назад

    First