FUN CHALLENGE means NO INFANTRY ALLOWED in this AWESOME 2v2! | WARNO Gameplay

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 окт 2024
  • Twitch 📺 / vulcanhdgaming
    Decided to set myself a silly challenge of winning a game of WARNO without infantry. Thankfully my teammate was on point this game but it was really fun to try this out!
    WARNO Gameplay Playlist! ► bit.ly/WARNOGa...
    Merch! 👕 vulcanhdgaming...
    Battlegroup: 39th Guards
    Battlegroup Codes: bit.ly/WARNOBa...
    Thanks to Eugen Systems for providing Early Access!
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Buy games I play and support the channel here! ► www.nexus.gg/V...
    Enjoyed the video? Here's some more! ► goo.gl/vHwUWj
    Support the channel on Patreon (it's a huge help!) ► / vulcanhdgaming
    Find awesome Total War content here! ► goo.gl/QAAZHN
    Join my Discord! ► / discord
    Contact Me!
    Twitter: / vulcanhdgaming
    Facebook: / vulcanhdgaming
    Instagram: / vulcanhdgaming
    Steam: steamcommunity....
    Patreon: / vulcanhdgaming
    Player.me: player.me/vulc...
    Music used: End Game by Per Kiilstofte
    machinimasound....
    Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
    (creativecommons...)

Комментарии • 25

  • @saithorthepyro3264
    @saithorthepyro3264 Год назад +56

    It was my great honor to be the sacrifical lamb proving that you can in fact beat people without infantry.

  • @warmachine5835
    @warmachine5835 Год назад +23

    I think this match really showcases one of Eugen's design decisions that stretches back to the EE/ALB days: different players taking different roles in team matches. I think in a 1v1 scenario this is probably not viable, but in a team match you get to reap the benefits of specialization--because your deck is so heavily stacked toward support vehicles, you act as a massive force multiplier to shilouette. They get to play the generalist, but since you're not dividing your attention to managing your own infantry, you can focus on sending your UAZs, helicopters, and tanks to where shilouette is fighting, essentially giving them all the fire support they could possibly want.
    I think this is kinda how Eugen envisioned the Wargame series being played years ago.

    • @saithorthepyro3264
      @saithorthepyro3264 Год назад +7

      Not necessarily. A more competent player than me would have been a lot better about pushing the town and taking advantage of the lack of infantry Vulcan can put in. If I had injvested more infantry and armored vehicles into the town itself it would have been much harder for Vulcan and Silhoute to dig me out.

    • @warmachine5835
      @warmachine5835 Год назад

      @@saithorthepyro3264 that's a fair assessment, I think. I admittedly haven't played much since the early Red Dragon days, so I might have some perception biases in play.

    • @Hardzen82
      @Hardzen82 Год назад

      @@saithorthepyro3264 tRUE ;-) ❤

  • @junibug6790
    @junibug6790 Год назад +6

    "Brumm brumm" says the jeep (which is great, if that's an intentional easter-egg by Eugen). :D

    • @VulcanHDGaming
      @VulcanHDGaming  Год назад +3

      Haha I edited it on the thumbnail 😉

    • @junibug6790
      @junibug6790 Год назад +1

      @@VulcanHDGaming Ha ha, oh boo. Time to start petitioning Eugen to make it into the actual game!

  • @deadmeat_0152
    @deadmeat_0152 Год назад +6

    7:12 maybe adjust the rules a bit, if its possible, on the BMP3s. Bring them in then sell the infantry immediately

  • @paulpanzer641
    @paulpanzer641 Год назад +5

    The ultimate Mad Max Experience

  • @generalmanager1369
    @generalmanager1369 Год назад +4

    Nice. That looks like a blast.

  • @DantezMaritu
    @DantezMaritu Год назад +1

    An incredibly good game. To continue the trend, how about a severely helicopter or aircraft focused deck? I don't mean the shitty helicopter rush, just essentially the same thing focusing on airborne units.

  • @xmifixmifi
    @xmifixmifi Год назад +3

    I may be the only one. But I quite like having a vehicle tab like in wargame.

  • @carsonm7292
    @carsonm7292 Год назад

    As a subscriber to Chess Simp, a RUclipsr who plays silly self-imposed challenge matches against low ELO players, these challenges appeal to me greatly.

  • @linders2000
    @linders2000 Год назад +3

    BRUM!!!!

  • @KG_BM
    @KG_BM Год назад +3

    What is this, warthunder for ants xD

  • @davidrossa4125
    @davidrossa4125 Год назад +1

    When you have to fight in the fallout

  • @thelemon2764
    @thelemon2764 Год назад +2

    I was confused why you didn't go with an armored deck which relies less on infantry anyways?

    • @VulcanHDGaming
      @VulcanHDGaming  Год назад +9

      This division has the most UAZs in the infantry tab to supplement.

    • @thelemon2764
      @thelemon2764 Год назад +1

      @@VulcanHDGaming it would seem that tanks are a bit more effective than a jeep

    • @saithorthepyro3264
      @saithorthepyro3264 Год назад +3

      @@thelemon2764 It's a cost and availability issue. He can use cards in Infantry that because of their low cost means he can bring way more of them than an additional card of tanks, and the costs are very different. T-62s run from 85-105 points, T-80s from 200-235 points. The jeeps are 35 points each, so 3-7 of them for every tank, and they are also one of the few things to head into heavy cover where if he runs into launchers it's not going to hurt too much from losing them.

  • @Satria-lv8qk
    @Satria-lv8qk Год назад

    Brilliant!

  • @beastmaster1219
    @beastmaster1219 Год назад

    Next time no tanks pls XD

  • @epicfte
    @epicfte Год назад

    I did ATGM only against the Soviets and by God is it awful

  • @royharrison5184
    @royharrison5184 Год назад

    😁