Exactly AND there must be an intention to commit a crime e.g theft, criminal damage etc, just touching a vehicle is not vehicle interference, people lean and touch other peoples vehicles all the time e.g putting on flyers, notes tickets etc..
@TheGwentAuditorTGA I know bro, it's slang and unprofessional was the point :) They do the same in the prison system, you're on a nicking.... you mean I'm being adjudicated.....
You need to get H N K Solicitors to make a claim against them for unlawful detainment and arrest. Lots of other auditors have used them successfully. Make a Freedom of Information request for the body worn camera footage and the security cameras in the Custody area. You should have a search record and the names and collar numbers of all those involved in the arrest and make a formal complaint against all of them. No charges so it was just a retaliatory arrest and the Sergeant has screwed up big time. Should work out a nice pay day for you.
@@geoffclifford3546 Yes, but he WAS looking into cars, which is not a crime, but it does raise their suspicion. Don't give the bast*rds an excuse to detain you.
Any police officer that is informed that the arresting officer is doing an unlawful act by the person that is detained just stands there and watches another police officer violate someone's civil rights is completely culpable in that violation. And are completely open to the same lawsuit. This would apply to the custody officer that booked you in
See Blue line badge ? Its a gang and they are all in it. (Oh and internally its a known badge that means I got your back) That's how you spot a wrong un
@@ianjordan8146 Exactly,, if a Sargent doesn't know what the hell he's talking about, what on earth does his minions have to follow? More corrupt behaviour.
@@UKAuditor listen up mate. I had stickers removed off my van by a neighbor. I reported it to police who told me no crime has been committed. I then asked if theoretically someone came to their station and peeled off all the stickers off their cars then that would be lawful. I stumped the officer and he said well I guess it would be legal in this case. Yet you get lifted for looking???
Correct; what they do (illegally) is they are hoping to find photo ID. If they can't find that, they look for a bank card. If they find one, they then ask "Is this yours?" If you say "No", they arrest you for handling stolen goods. If you say "Yes" then they have your name. Of course, you shouldn't answer the question, but the FILTH then fall back on th other lie, arresting you on suspicion of handling stolen goods. They are all c*nts. Never help the police, never go to their assistance, never answer any questions.
"You are in a private car park" says the first idiot - right in front of the public entrance to the police station. I didn't know we had a private police force!!!!!!
Second case I’ve seen this week of an arrest over looking in a police car. Other case 3 females pepper sprayed a guy and his 14 year old son for again looking. Serious crime is avoided for this. How many officers were taken off the street for this. The force is a disgrace.
Saw that video they’d parked across his back gates then attacked him accused him of meddling with the car and dragged him out of his garden while spraying his kid with parvo
Congratulations, Leicestershire Police. You have now given citizens the grounds upon which they can arrest police in a citizens arrest for s. 9 of PACE anytime the police look into a vehicle and prosecuting them Thing is... if looking into cars is unlawful, it is unlawful FOR EVERYONE!
Cuffs already on and 3 more officers join the two idiots already there. First officer (slaphead) is so excited that he thinks he's found a wrong un! "Not your cars".....most cars that people look at as they walk past aren't theirs! Tyrant.
IF HE DIDNT GIVE HIS DETAILS UPON ARREST, HOW DID THE POLICE KNOW WHO TO GIVE THE GLASSES TO, THEN HAVE HIS DETAILS ON THE PIECE OF PAPER, WITH HIS GLASSES COLLECTION, 0:52 "JUST CONFIRM THATS YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND SIGN THERE" THEN THE CONSTABLE POINTS TO THE DETAILS WITH HIS PEN 🤣🤣🤬🤬... HE TELLS PORKY PIES 🤬🤬🤬
@@petergarbutt9521 I do indicate in the video that I had to give it, but that was long after the arrest otherwise they were just going to unlawfully keep the property for even longer. Plus police constabularies know your details if you launch a claim against them. Bottom line is, I never gave details whilst I was arrested
You did a good job. Don't tell them anything where they made the mistake is by arresting you should be told you don't have to say anything which of course means you don't have to say ANYTHING. If they had only detained you then you could if you wanted enter into a conversation and possibly given your details but arrest means say nothing apart from I need the duty solicitor . Like your style and be watching more of your stuff.
Held for 8 hours . What did they investigate ? A camera that look out over the carpark . Really 8 hours . Wow what workers we have in the police. 8 hours
They have always done it to people they dislike,keep them in for as long as possible to upset your day,the favourite is to let you out after 1amas everything is shut and public transport has stopped
No wonder crime is so high when so many officers don't understand our UK laws. It was obvious from the start that the arrest was illegal. Why the officers did not know that, I don't know. They need retraining. HNK Solicitors will have as field day with this one.
Must be wonderful to work at HNK Solicitors. A big pile of forms photocopied, just awaiting the idiot officers' and station details to be added, then off to the post box and another richly deserved fee in the pockets of the Mighty HNK.
Absolute idiots in costumes completely ignorant of the law they must be sued unfortunately it comes out of the taxpayers pocket there is no accountability for these idiots in costumes.
“If you don’t remain calm I’ll be taking you to the floor” (NO REPLY) “I’ll take that as you’re not going to remain calm then”. That’s a threat of violence
Nor did custody sergeant they are also obligated to check that the charge is lawful as they are the ones responsible for your protection and that covers false charges.
@ when the police get annoyed they tend to let their egos take over their rationality. I guess it is a natural reaction which they should keep in check.
So they arrested you on suspicion of " looking into vehicles" then decided to punish you and falsely imprison you to teach you a lesson. Sue the pants off them mate.
The arrest is blatantly unlawful if acting on feelings and imagination without any object facts pointing to a crime. Suspicion alone is no reason for arrest for anything. Simply looking at a car is not a crime. If they check the vehicles or check security cameras and see no sign of interference, then they have no justification or grounds for arrest.
The ignorance is strong with this one.. See the 'gang badge' that's all I need to see these days, and his behaviour shows exactly why, Oh and his I want to hide my face idiot he was with, IF two (or more) police officers attend and one breaks the rules or law and the other one does nothing about it that's not ONE BAD APPLE , that's two.. (or in this case more) I hope his mums proud
@@cronocide to restraint but that's it isn't it's the CIA that are combat trained besides if they are tough why not do this off duty alone, no one would called them cowards again
A gang of men surrounded you stopped you from leaving and threatened to put you on the ground, because you looked at something, if police are allowed to do this we are all in trouble
Police really struggle in court, this will be another easy payout. All those cops for no crime, the CCTV operators clearly can't spot actual car thieves. The cop who put the cuffs on was petrified and clearly needs better self confidence. Another hefty payout, £2500 per hour of an arrest.
Yeah, this is a successful civil claim if ever there was one. Multiple officers have admitted they’ve arrested you based on you conducting a perfectly legal activity that has nothing to do with the offence they’ve actually arrested you for! Looking at something, filming something is NOT interfering with it. Even the report to which they’re responding says nothing about interfering with the vehicles, merely looking/filming them so the officer has absolutely no reasonable grounds.
5:29 Because you're SUSPECTED of an offence to the point where my colleague has arrested you, you need to id. NO. Just because this officer has arrested him it doesn't mean that it's a LAWFUL arrest. And he only has to give his details if he's lawfully arrested. The officer did no investigation. He just took the word of a cctv operator, which is just hearsay. The officer was just butthurt that the guy didn't immediately answer his questions. Unlawful arrest all day long.
Need sacking for miss use of the law. Idiots always escalate listen to the threats the Sargent is the worst with his gang badge. The other officers are culpable by doing nothing and going along with it. Muppets they just earn the hate .
Jeezo that sergeant has is on a serious power trip arresting someone for looking into a car in a police station. Seriously what sort of idiot is going to break into a car within police gates
Just in case anyone has forgotten, the police can’t get to your granny’s house for 2 weeks to investigate the burglary in her house because they are far too busy and short handed!!!
It’s ironic that the police unlawfully search people cars everyday but a member of the public looking in to a car window in a publicly accessible car park is a crime I swear uk police get more stupid by the hour really hope you sue them
A complete and ridiculous overreaction by the sergeant for arresting you based on a third party claiming you “looked into cars” which in itself is a non crime (vehicle interference is a physical act). The silly sergeant then advised you not to say any more while under caution and then his colleague asked you a question😀. The reality is that you can say as little or as much as you want when under caution, but the more you say the more work for the sergeant to write everything down (obviously that would be too much like hard work for him😀).
@RichardHolland4881 please quote where I EVER said "its illegal to walk through open gates", I will give you a life time to find it 👍 please do get your eyes tested aswell, as in what world does my comment in any way defend anybody?
You handled this well, but I’ll say one important thing. Film everything, not sure why you’d carry out a “pre audit” first without cameras on? Opening yourself up to needless issues there, it will also help support a claim if you have uninterrupted footage. Lots of videos where auditors are stopped for vehicle interference, seem to always suspiciously start seconds before being confronted. Shows nothing before, so the viewer can’t know, and you can’t prove what really happened.
I appreciate the feedback and I thank you for commenting and watching the video. I will keep this in mind, bearing in mind sometimes one forgets to tune on glasses/the camera. To be honest, it's all up to interpretation but the fact I had a "no further action" charge really does show how unlawful the arrest was regardless of filming or not.
They dont know what illegal activity is. This stop proves it, and the fact they just wanted to waste your time with custody. They dont pay ,we do when the rightful prosecutions take place. Should come out of the pension fund.
I watched this video twice because i thought i missed the " good apple ", but no they was all bad apples rotten to the core and the rot goes to the top, 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
🤣🤣🤣FFS - the sergeant needs to go back to school - the asphalt he's standing on has more intelligence than him. Arrested for "looking in car windows" - I don't think he'll be getting any awards for logical thinking.
@@ianhill4585 they will be arresting people for standing on the cracks in the pavement and numerous other strange reasons as per that police sketch with Rowan Atkinson from a while ago. That was so funny, i guess “looking into vehicles”should be added to the list.😊.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Looking in vehicles is not vehicle interference, vehicle interference is physical, you have to actually touch the car. Ridiculous
Exactly AND there must be an intention to commit a crime e.g theft, criminal damage etc, just touching a vehicle is not vehicle interference, people lean and touch other peoples vehicles all the time e.g putting on flyers, notes tickets etc..
He also said you're nicked and not you're arrested. What is nicked? 😅
@ that’s very old fashioned.
@TheGwentAuditorTGA I know bro, it's slang and unprofessional was the point :)
They do the same in the prison system, you're on a nicking.... you mean I'm being adjudicated.....
@ well we all know what Prison Officers are like. A prime example would be Wandsworth
You need to get H N K Solicitors to make a claim against them for unlawful detainment and arrest. Lots of other auditors have used them successfully. Make a Freedom of Information request for the body worn camera footage and the security cameras in the Custody area. You should have a search record and the names and collar numbers of all those involved in the arrest and make a formal complaint against all of them. No charges so it was just a retaliatory arrest and the Sergeant has screwed up big time. Should work out a nice pay day for you.
Custody sargeants need to stop as soon as fools taken him in
Ask for the details of person that made the false accusation . 👍
@@geoffclifford3546 Yes, but he WAS looking into cars, which is not a crime, but it does raise their suspicion.
Don't give the bast*rds an excuse to detain you.
And he coughed all over your bag, too, so you need a new one.
Hnk Will get you 50p and a packet of crisps,try getting serious solicitor.
Any police officer that is informed that the arresting officer is doing an unlawful act by the person that is detained just stands there and watches another police officer violate someone's civil rights is completely culpable in that violation. And are completely open to the same lawsuit. This would apply to the custody officer that booked you in
See Blue line badge ? Its a gang and they are all in it. (Oh and internally its a known badge that means I got your back) That's how you spot a wrong un
He dsnt do well with the Birds either locally 😱💩🤮
Lacking certain skills 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Arrested by a Sargent who doesn't know looking into cars isn't vehicle interface 😮
@@ianjordan8146 Exactly,, if a Sargent doesn't know
what the hell he's talking about, what on earth does his minions have to follow?
More corrupt behaviour.
Yeah, surely interference is a physical thing.
He did the aresst because he was butt hurt
He uses psychology to make it look like ignorance so he qualifies for immunity while enacting corruption.
@@WorksopGimpI bet he wouldn't meet this guy off duty alone
Tips to auditors - Never carry ID, and always park your car miles away. Take a very long way round to return to it too.
Another tip. Grow up. Get a life. Try a job.
@@brianbickle7395 Another tip Brian, don't watch these videos, get a job.
@@brianbickle7395your job must be BOOTLICKING 😁
@@brianbickle7395Brian your mother is calling, she wants you to go and tidy your bedroom!!!!!!
@@malgf4145 brian cant , his mouth is too full of boot
Let me guess... They can't stand anyone looking a police vehicle!
Bingo! Stay tuned, this will be great I can say this much (without spoiling)!!
@@UKAuditor listen up mate. I had stickers removed off my van by a neighbor. I reported it to police who told me no crime has been committed. I then asked if theoretically someone came to their station and peeled off all the stickers off their cars then that would be lawful. I stumped the officer and he said well I guess it would be legal in this case. Yet you get lifted for looking???
@@UKAuditorI would have just gone limp😂. Let them do the work. That is not resisting. I would have just stayed there until they had to release me.
The stickers is tampering, and if paint came off, criminal damage.
@@cliffbutler9820 exactly
These coppers are not searching him for weapons or crowbars or screwdrivers they were looking for ID just my opinion
Correct; what they do (illegally) is they are hoping to find photo ID. If they can't find that, they look for a bank card. If they find one, they then ask "Is this yours?" If you say "No", they arrest you for handling stolen goods. If you say "Yes" then they have your name. Of course, you shouldn't answer the question, but the FILTH then fall back on th other lie, arresting you on suspicion of handling stolen goods.
They are all c*nts. Never help the police, never go to their assistance, never answer any questions.
My thoughts too
Good lad. Never speak, never cooperate.
I like your audits.
Appreciated it pal!
@@UKAuditor the only thing i objected to here is that the female cops werent the ones who cuffed you
He did speak.
This is how clowns in uniforms go viral.
Not just clowns they are criminals
in court will he say i told him i was nicking him ? or will his statement read i advised the subject he was under arrest ?
They really do think that they are the only people allowed to scrutinise others. There’s a law suit in this. Follow it up.
"You are in a private car park" says the first idiot - right in front of the public entrance to the police station. I didn't know we had a private police force!!!!!!
We do not have a functional Police. THey are corperate POLICE! not people/public Police
Always demand a copy of your custody record do not leave with out it.
Thanks for the recommendation mate!
@@UKAuditoryou can put in a foia/sars request for it and by email if you don’t want to travel back there 👍
Remember they officially illegally arrested you for looking into vehicles which is not a crime don't let them get away with it
Second case I’ve seen this week of an arrest over looking in a police car. Other case 3 females pepper sprayed a guy and his 14 year old son for again looking. Serious crime is avoided for this. How many officers were taken off the street for this. The force is a disgrace.
Saw that video they’d parked across his back gates then attacked him accused him of meddling with the car and dragged him out of his garden while spraying his kid with parvo
@ Did you see the TLA video?
He was approached by around 10cops detective turned off TLAs body cam. One female pulled a taser on him. Check it out
Congratulations, Leicestershire Police. You have now given citizens the grounds upon which they can arrest police in a citizens arrest for s. 9 of PACE anytime the police look into a vehicle and prosecuting them
Thing is... if looking into cars is unlawful, it is unlawful FOR EVERYONE!
This happens because they have no brain or should I say they can’t use it properly. How is possible to become a police officer whitout a brain?
Oh yes that's true but you know in reality you try that with plod and they'll trump any charge up to get you done
Cuffs already on and 3 more officers join the two idiots already there. First officer (slaphead) is so excited that he thinks he's found a wrong un! "Not your cars".....most cars that people look at as they walk past aren't theirs! Tyrant.
Slaphead how apt 😂😂
He was twitchy AF and clearly on an adrenaline dump, that's why he couldn't book his collar himself.
Hooray a auditor not giving his name just subscribed mate 👍 👌
Aaand not answering the' things in pockets' question , they want the search --any risk is on them to factor in...
@@ianhill4585It would be fun with a bag of mouse traps!🤔🤣👍
IF HE DIDNT GIVE HIS DETAILS UPON ARREST, HOW DID THE POLICE KNOW WHO TO GIVE THE GLASSES TO, THEN HAVE HIS DETAILS ON THE PIECE OF PAPER, WITH HIS GLASSES COLLECTION, 0:52 "JUST CONFIRM THATS YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND SIGN THERE" THEN THE CONSTABLE POINTS TO THE DETAILS WITH HIS PEN 🤣🤣🤬🤬... HE TELLS PORKY PIES 🤬🤬🤬
@@petergarbutt9521 I do indicate in the video that I had to give it, but that was long after the arrest otherwise they were just going to unlawfully keep the property for even longer. Plus police constabularies know your details if you launch a claim against them.
Bottom line is, I never gave details whilst I was arrested
You did a good job. Don't tell them anything where they made the mistake is by arresting you should be told you don't have to say anything which of course means you don't have to say ANYTHING. If they had only detained you then you could if you wanted enter into a conversation and possibly given your details but arrest means say nothing apart from I need the duty solicitor . Like your style and be watching more of your stuff.
Held for 8 hours . What did they investigate ? A camera that look out over the carpark . Really 8 hours . Wow what workers we have in the police. 8 hours
8 hours in custody for looking in cars yet they only get 24 hours to lay charges for serious crimes.
It was a 'up yours" arrest and incarceration, sheer bloody mindedness.
@ianhill4585 they call this work. 8hrs to investigate .
They like to release auditors at the dead of night with no means to get home. Part of the punishment.
They have always done it to people they dislike,keep them in for as long as possible to upset your day,the favourite is to let you out after 1amas everything is shut and public transport has stopped
Looking into are cars is now a crime unbelievable.😢claim coming their way .
What do you expect he’s wearing a gang badge.very unprofessional police .retired lifeboatman
No wonder crime is so high when so many officers don't understand our UK laws. It was obvious from the start that the arrest was illegal. Why the officers did not know that, I don't know. They need retraining. HNK Solicitors will have as field day with this one.
Must be wonderful to work at HNK Solicitors. A big pile of forms photocopied, just awaiting the idiot officers' and station details to be added, then off to the post box and another richly deserved fee in the pockets of the Mighty HNK.
My cleaner widcraise Her eyebrows 👁️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️👮
muppets 🧠🤮
Embarrassing fools Chief Constable 🆘👮💩💩💩
They’re trained to bend the laws to suit. They can always change the charge later on. It’s a tried and tested strategy.
Absolute idiots in costumes completely ignorant of the law they must be sued unfortunately it comes out of the taxpayers pocket there is no accountability for these idiots in costumes.
“If you don’t remain calm I’ll be taking you to the floor” (NO REPLY) “I’ll take that as you’re not going to remain calm then”. That’s a threat of violence
Obviously he was going to abuse his powers, he’s wearing the “us vs them” gang badge.
And that is precisely what it is.
"us before them'"
i live in this city, im shocked
i use this police station often when i need directions.
shame on these plumbobs
Sergeant you really didn’t do very well did you?
Nor did custody sergeant they are also obligated to check that the charge is lawful as they are the ones responsible for your protection and that covers false charges.
@ when the police get annoyed they tend to let their egos take over their rationality. I guess it is a natural reaction which they should keep in check.
A private car park that everybody can walk through who visits the police station🤔
So they arrested you on suspicion of " looking into vehicles" then decided to punish you and falsely imprison you to teach you a lesson.
Sue the pants off them mate.
This will only stop when the tax payers stop footing the bill and they have to pay the settlement from their own pockets or pension fund.
A Sargent as well what a complete joke, the tone and way he was speaking i knew before i looked that he would have the gang badge on.
The arrest is blatantly unlawful if acting on feelings and imagination without any object facts pointing to a crime. Suspicion alone is no reason for arrest for anything. Simply looking at a car is not a crime. If they check the vehicles or check security cameras and see no sign of interference, then they have no justification or grounds for arrest.
"We'll teach you a lesson" Punishment arrest! Never ceases to amaze me how many turn up, six? Unbelievable!
The ignorance is strong with this one.. See the 'gang badge' that's all I need to see these days, and his behaviour shows exactly why, Oh and his I want to hide my face idiot he was with, IF two (or more) police officers attend and one breaks the rules or law and the other one does nothing about it that's not ONE BAD APPLE , that's two.. (or in this case more) I hope his mums proud
Precisely!
They are told over and over that badge is perceived by the public as a negative gang badge, so by them wearing they are giving us the fingers
@@cronocidehow tough would they be off duty alone?
@@ZombiestFever I donno they are trained in hand to hand combat and twisting bits that hurt.
@@cronocide to restraint but that's it isn't it's the CIA that are combat trained besides if they are tough why not do this off duty alone, no one would called them cowards again
A gang of men surrounded you stopped you from leaving and threatened to put you on the ground, because you looked at something, if police are allowed to do this we are all in trouble
Bullies and Cowards they are
How many police officers for a man with a camera and in a public place gates wide open
HNK cash out brother, take as much cash as possible .
Dumb cops = payday 😅
They dont care, its not coming out of their pockets, the cash is coming from us tax payers.
Looking and filming is not vehicle interference. Unlawful arrest and probably used just to get your id? This would be a slam dunk win for HNK.
Police really struggle in court, this will be another easy payout. All those cops for no crime, the CCTV operators clearly can't spot actual car thieves. The cop who put the cuffs on was petrified and clearly needs better self confidence. Another hefty payout, £2500 per hour of an arrest.
Well how did that fool make sergeant
You can dodge the jail, but you can't dodge the ride ! All this is part of the punishment, plus the seizing of your possessions.
"Arrested for looking into vehicles"
Too bad that's not a crime. Civil claim.
Yeah, this is a successful civil claim if ever there was one. Multiple officers have admitted they’ve arrested you based on you conducting a perfectly legal activity that has nothing to do with the offence they’ve actually arrested you for! Looking at something, filming something is NOT interfering with it. Even the report to which they’re responding says nothing about interfering with the vehicles, merely looking/filming them so the officer has absolutely no reasonable grounds.
What are you a solicitor, how would you know.
@@Shouwer123 You don't have to be a lawyer to understand the very basics of law pal
@@gucciadjective7745 the very basics aren’t enough
Bar is set so low. Does the disgusting sergeant not realise the the evidence of no crime is on ur camera.
auditers need to turn up en mass when one gets arrested just so they realise its legal to look.
Another example of two tier policing of none crime 🚔
What are the two tiers?
@@davidsmith5523 Them and us. Ever saw a police constable arrested for looking into a car ?
5:29 Because you're SUSPECTED of an offence to the point where my colleague has arrested you, you need to id. NO. Just because this officer has arrested him it doesn't mean that it's a LAWFUL arrest. And he only has to give his details if he's lawfully arrested. The officer did no investigation. He just took the word of a cctv operator, which is just hearsay. The officer was just butthurt that the guy didn't immediately answer his questions. Unlawful arrest all day long.
pathetic, Policing in the UK is such a clown show.
It's okay for the police to look into everyone else's cars, vans, trucks but when the public do it its an arrestable offence.
Need sacking for miss use of the law. Idiots always escalate listen to the threats the Sargent is the worst with his gang badge. The other officers are culpable by doing nothing and going along with it. Muppets they just earn the hate .
none of the cops identified themselves
You've been arrested for nothing ! Sue them in Court !
Blue line gangster
Well spotted
Blue line gangster's 😂😂😂😂😂
Sue! easy payday! No chance in hell you'd lose this case!
It's always the one wearing the gang badge
Jeezo that sergeant has is on a serious power trip arresting someone for looking into a car in a police station. Seriously what sort of idiot is going to break into a car within police gates
Just in case anyone has forgotten, the police can’t get to your granny’s house for 2 weeks to investigate the burglary in her house because they are far too busy and short handed!!!
Too right
MASS AUDIT NEEDED!
The hatred builds and builds. They do not have a clue what they are doing.
It’s ironic that the police unlawfully search people cars everyday but a member of the public looking in to a car window in a publicly accessible car park is a crime I swear uk police get more stupid by the hour really hope you sue them
A threat of violence as well "if you're not going to be calm we'll take you to the floor". He wouldn't say that if he was on his own the dweeb.
And without the uniform
They should be sacked all of them
Locked up for 8 hours for nothing
Once the charge is dropped sue the cop on criminal grounds for civil grounds he literally gets away scot free.
Sue them,this is illegal arrest & any judge would raise their eyebrows when they looking into this case & evidence .
The police work 'independent of policy' - section 5 1829 peels principles.
HNK solicitors all the way. The process is the punishment for having done nothing wrong. 8 hours to not investigate diddly.
All of these cops need to be held accountable for allowing this madness to carry on.. blue-line gang.
A complete and ridiculous overreaction by the sergeant for arresting you based on a third party claiming you “looked into cars” which in itself is a non crime (vehicle interference is a physical act). The silly sergeant then advised you not to say any more while under caution and then his colleague asked you a question😀. The reality is that you can say as little or as much as you want when under caution, but the more you say the more work for the sergeant to write everything down (obviously that would be too much like hard work for him😀).
They did nothing about rape gangs
Finally, someone using the correct word for them. Too many say "grooming" which is stupid.
6 oink oinks just for one auditor?? Never see any of them when there's a REAL crime I wonder why.
Enjoy your compensation
Looking in cars and filming them 😂😂😂
but Mr Muppet thinks its illegal to walk through open gates 🤣🤣 yet here he is defeding the same actions what a muppet 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@RichardHolland4881 please quote where I EVER said "its illegal to walk through open gates", I will give you a life time to find it 👍 please do get your eyes tested aswell, as in what world does my comment in any way defend anybody?
@@Mrchipsv2I get my eyes tested at Asif Eye Care.
Once again, obviously an area of very little REAL crime! or maybe they are all happened to be on on their tea break
You handled this well, but I’ll say one important thing. Film everything, not sure why you’d carry out a “pre audit” first without cameras on? Opening yourself up to needless issues there, it will also help support a claim if you have uninterrupted footage.
Lots of videos where auditors are stopped for vehicle interference, seem to always suspiciously start seconds before being confronted. Shows nothing before, so the viewer can’t know, and you can’t prove what really happened.
I appreciate the feedback and I thank you for commenting and watching the video.
I will keep this in mind, bearing in mind sometimes one forgets to tune on glasses/the camera. To be honest, it's all up to interpretation but the fact I had a "no further action" charge really does show how unlawful the arrest was regardless of filming or not.
You do not need to give details upon arrest, Lawful arrest maybe, But unlawful arrest, Never.
Sue the thugs
Can't believe you committed the act of looking 😱😱😱
I hope they put you in prison for life for this obvious disgusting crime of looking at a car.
The only name you give them is Scott, Scott eff all to do with you
Put in a request for all the camera footage from when you were being booked and the interview room footage,also all emails regarding this arrest
They dont know what illegal activity is. This stop proves it, and the fact they just wanted to waste your time with custody. They dont pay ,we do when the rightful prosecutions take place. Should come out of the pension fund.
That copper trying to hold on to the little bit of fluff on his head 😂 looks like he back combs it,,, JUST LET IT GO !!
I watched this video twice because i thought i missed the " good apple ", but no they was all bad apples rotten to the core and the rot goes to the top, 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
💩💩💩💩
What does "nicking you" mean?
Is it a legal term?
So the caller did the investigation not the police.
So what training in law did the caller have?
🤣🤣🤣FFS - the sergeant needs to go back to school - the asphalt he's standing on has more intelligence than him. Arrested for "looking in car windows" - I don't think he'll be getting any awards for logical thinking.
It's a new ish wrinkle ,it's been done on many auditors, AB a few times, it's just retaliatory against , primarily -- auditors.
@@ianhill4585 they will be arresting people for standing on the cracks in the pavement and numerous other strange reasons as per that police sketch with Rowan Atkinson from a while ago. That was so funny, i guess “looking into vehicles”should be added to the list.😊.
If I knew you were at Mansfield police station I would have come and said hello
Be glad you didn't go, you might have got arrested for looking.
That's what I wanted to do. Instead I got my "welcome" in the form of an arrest 😁
Time to go and record there if you are local 👍👍
nasty bunch there...
Holding on to the cuffs is illegal? Iirc it pressurises a nerve and pain compliance wasn't needed. Cuffs weren't needed to start with.
what is the legal definition of "NICKING"?
So to the thug at 6:01 admits its "suspicion", "not saying you have done it" but arrests anyway
Police may act tough but I'm sure they wouldn't do this off duty alone
Make sure you film everything
Your being arrested for looking at these vehicles, thats going to play well in court.
arrested for looking into a vehicle, that's no offence i ever heard of, the second he said that and i knew it was unlawful i would have resisted.
"you have the right to remain silent" ... "You must identify yourself"
Absolutely ridiculous. Well done for sticking to your guns 👍
Do they actually train these cretins, arresting for looking at vehicles, they need training or sacking.
NO training apparent these days 🤡🤡🤡😱😱😱
You're no Marti Blagborough to be sure, but despite that... did you contact HNK to get a payout from these clowns?
Indeed I am, I am making my claim against them (I did indicate this in my intro)
And they wonder why the police aren't respected.
Why are the police looking so shabby, clean-shaven used to be the go???