Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Attack On Media, Raids, Art. 370.. Justice RF Nariman's Lecture On 'Constitution: Checks & Balances'
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 авг 2024
- Former Supreme Court Judge Justice Rohinton F Nariman Expresses Concerns Over Recent Taxation Matters and Raids in Address at Smt Bansari Sheth Endowment Lecture on 'Constitution: Check And Balances
#supremecourt #supremecourtofindia #article370 #kashmir #bbc#pmmodi
Become A Mojo Story Member Now: / @mojostory
Subscribe to us for more updates:
Follow us on Twitter: / themojostory
Like us on Facebook: / themojostory
Instagram: / mojostory.in
For more videos: / @mojostory
Disclaimer: The views of guests who appear on Mojo Story, as well as the views of interviewees or speeches by public figures or those in the news, are their personal opinions. At no point do they reflect the views of the organization.
![Federalism: Legislative Relations between Centre and States [Justice J.S.Verma 2nd Memorial Lecture]](/img/1.gif)
Mini constitutional lecture 🎉
Thanks Justice Nirman
A very illuminating talk by justice Nariman. It is time that we have a debate amongst the working judiciary with the retired judges so that such checks and balances in our constitution are not missed out.
What an excellent speech. Hope for India with intellectuals like these. As was mentioned there is a pool of talent ofneutral and objective minds which must be tapped for the greater good of India. Wish scholars like these who constantly remind India of the great philosophers like Dr. Ambedkar thrive!!
He is factually wrong, speech is partisan. How can it be "excellent"?
In fact I wonder how much benefits he has got under UPA rule to talk such nonsense. Removing art 370 is also causing stomachache!
Excellent..very excellent. Thank u sir..
Justice Nariman made it so easy for a layman to understand. Great talk…useful . Hope every citizen listens to this and understands how important it is not to let power hungry politicians ruin our democracy.
Here's a speech that should be heard by all citizens, MPs and MLAs, Ministers and Governors.
Present CJI must hear the speech, removing his blind bias for corrupted GOVT.
So, CJI is biased, government is corrupt and Mr. Nariman is all good ! Wow ! 😂
Mr. Nariman seems don’t remember parliament’s constitution power over state assembly already validated in the “Andhra Pradesh state bifurcation bill”. Where state assembly unanimously rejected the state bifurcation bill and sent to central government, but still parliament and Rajyasabha went ahead approved the bill in 2014. So parliament powers unquestionable over state affairs. Whatever Mr. Nariman raising J&K bill on state assembly approval are not valid.
He is trying to add something to complicate the issue to a lay man.
This Nariman is trying to build the narrative that democracy is in danger in India. Looks like he is a foreign agent. Must be a member of some secret society. What was he doing when Cong (I) signed secret deals with the Communist Party of China. Where was his judicial expertise and concern for the country then ??
The great lecture given by you sir l more impressed
Mr Nariman, I cant understand why inclusion of Opposition leader in the selection of CEC/EC is "Disturbing Fact"? Earlier, only the PM of the Gov used to do that. Can you explain? No, you will not, since you have your own agenda.
Opposition leader isn't the problem sir, the substitution of chief justice with a union minister is the problem. I hope you have an understanding of impartiality and a balanced panel in deciding an extremely important position which will fall to bias if not upheld to fair play.
Why CJI is required in administration matters.? Let him work towards reducing the huge pendcy in judiciary.
What happened in Shah Bano case? Mr Nariman? Didnt your system fail?
Sorry we are busy Destroying the constitution and the country. So go to Pakistan to get justice 😂😂
Justice Rohinton's clarity is above excellence. He should consent to teach in a law college.
Excellent speech.. Thanks H'ble Justice RF Nariman
This man is an Institute
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Supreme Court's verdict is a hard blow on Democracy and a heartbreak inflicted on those Kashmiris who really believed in the essence of 🇮🇳 Democracy
No Kashmiri believes in the Constitution of India. The word genocide is not mentioned in the constitution of India. The genocide of Kashmiri Hindus shall and will always be in the hearts and minds of Hindus for generations.
lol the same Kashmirs who had limited SC/ STs to hold only chaprasi position throughout the state?
Yaar Rohit, it's not about reservations or special status or bla bla, it's about upholding Constitution. It's the same country which hanged a foreign terrorist like kasab after going through procedure established by the law.
@@_rohit97 there are no jobs here in j&k. Remember J&k is the 2nd most unemployed state in India. Whoever gets a job gets it on merit basis except for a few cases of paper leaks for which current govt. is itself responsible and it is common in every state.
Where did you get that info that scs and sts are discriminated against?
Before the revocation of Article 370 and 35A, 'The Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Act, 2004' was in force to provide reservation in jobs to the scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and other socially and educationally backward classes in the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir,"
According to the jk reservation act 2004..
The Government shall reserve seats in the Professional Institutions for candidates belonging to reserved categories and such other classes and categories as may be notified from time to time: Provided that the total percentage of reservation shall in no case exceed 50%.
RESERVATION IN APPOINTMENT BY DIRECT RECRUITMENT3. Reservation in appointment. -2[(1)] Except as otherwiseprovided hereinafter, available vacancies to the extent as may be notified by the Government from time to time shall be reserved for appointment direct recruitment from amongst the person belonging to : -(a) Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes which shall not exceed the ratio and proportion as the population of each such category bears to the total population of the State as perthe latest available census; and
(b) socially and educationally backward classes:Provided that the total percentage of reservation shall in no case exceed 50%:
It’s not only hard blow for democracy but also hardest blow for judiciary’s integrity!
Absolutely profound lecture. Hope judiciary takes note. Learnt a lot.
Hatts of to this Judge for standing i
for fair judiciary
Forget about holding the bills by Governer, in earlier past, Governor will dismiss the assembly at slightest pretext, Mr Nariman.
Wonderfully explained, Sir
How much did Rohinton charge for a hearing? Who can afford it? A common citizen cannot approach even the lower court, what to speak of HC and SC? Speaking on all of what Nariman said has no point unless access is easy and cheap.
What Nariman has to say about the atrocities on Kashmir Pandits? What was Constitution
Rightly pointed out
Great lecture of sir nariman
If Justice Nariman has raised issues and points, he has the right to say and should be heard by the present SUPREME COURT CHIEF JUDGE! His remarks are pointing pointed questions to CJ Chandrachud! Gogoi : MP : : Chandrachud : ?
Either a Governor or MP of Rajya Sabha, chairman of Human Rights Commission!
The CJI should explain his position!
What a profound and an eye opener lecture for people and the government 👏🏻.
Judiciary didnt say a word during Emergency, when whole constitutionality issues were flouted, structure of constitution (adding Secular) was destroyed- while most opposition was in jail.
What are you saying....Are we living in times of emergency again?
now its religious emergency, why can't u enjoy a bit fascism and communalism ?
What has changed now...All institutions are in the control of the Govt...including judiciary.
*Almost every judgement in favour of ruling dispensation is evidence that pensionable jobs must end for batter India*
Because you are not in government job
Why you are talking absolutely irrelevant?
They certainly lose their beloved Persia to Islamist but we too lose Some territory to Islamist but not anymore.
Very interesting and educative Constitution on the lips.
Very good
How worthy listen to juctice Nariman
Very informative one.
Consultation becomes Concurrence? Where in the world such words are equated?
Today law is dead in front of criminals like Modi and Tadipaar
Shocking how such an important lecture gets so little media coverage
No body will take retired Justice words seriously while attacking govt of India.. 2:35
😊
We need to circulate the speech of #Justice #RohintonNariman on #ConstitutionalLaw at the 30th Bansari Sheth Endowment Lecture on the theme "The Constitution of India : Checks and Balances"
This must be circulated to all sane calm right thinking academia, unions,
to all the citizens of #India especially to all #schools #colleges for their #empowerment and protection of their #humanrights truly disturbing in today's timid #SupremeCourtofIndia. Thankyou #Justice #RohintonNariman 🙏
Excellent Speech
Actually this was emergency unofficially imposed by Modi Government
Unconvincing lecture by retired justice
This speech proves there were, there are and there will be brave people who have the courage to speak the truth without any filter which is essentially needed in today's time, this speech needs to spread as much as possible, very big thanks from common people sir
This person didnot do any substantial worthwhile or good or logical work or judgement during his tenurity and now giving lectures post retirement.
But then who defends the govts in the SC... it is the lawyers who take privileges from the union govt and defend all its decisions...
If the law has to exist then the AG or the lawyers need to reason out why is this particular law and will it impact the citizens...
Why they speak only after becoming X, why he was not a whistle blower while it happened when he was actively in service, now we can consider he is equally responsible for what happened till he was active for not taking action wisely..😏😏
Not answerable?
Upto 2023 Election commissioners were appointed by Canbinet(only pm). The process involved Leader if opposition also. What's the complaint here?
How many times Art 356 been used after 2014?
But it has been used hundreds of times before. Congress, after winning General election at center, used to dismiss all opposition gov in states.
@@kbaliyan Rohington was ok with congress dismissing opposition govts. It was kosher
what what happened in Jammu and Kashmir all these 70 years cannot be blinded by our eyes. Why was Congress have not taken the necessary to democratic steps to free and fair election in Jammu Kashmir for so many years. Why this fellow is not speaking about the atrocities on Hindu women. instrument of accession signed by a Raja Hari Singh is the lost of sovereignty of the state, that is now fully under control of centre from accession.
No solution 😢
In fact he was talking about when there will be no Constitution of India in existence by aggression of Modi Government
End result is peace is restored in that area which is more important to stop blood shed. By this INDA assumed ownership to do best to that area. Lot of development is taking place. Supreme court decision need to be honoured in the given situation. .Article 370 is unbiased? Wars were created on hanging the ownership issue.
C JI must act suo moto review the order of 379 and bill on EC.
Agar democracy khat huyee to bjp se jyada opposition parties jimmedar hongi .
We have to tolerate Gujrat model which recognises one act play .
as opposed to corrupt rotten waste bengal model of Momta ??? Country will choose Gujrat model every time
1] Proviso to 370(3) clearly mentions that a recommendation from the SAME Constituent Assembly as mentioned in #2 above MUST be received BEFORE the president can issue such a proclamation. Now, SAME Constituent Assembly just CANNOT be recreated - so, in my humble opinion, the President can NEVER issue such a proclamation.
2] Article 3 does not mention any manner in which a state can be converted into one or more UTs, unless a residual part of the state remains a state. In absence of the SC adjudicating on the subject and / or passing any order to the contrary, how is that Article 3 to be interpreted?
3] The SC has chosen not to adjudicate on whether the imposition of Prez.Rule u/s 356 was justifiable when an alternative govt could be formed and politicial parties were staking claim to form it.
What do you, Mr Nariman, say about selection of Judges? Why not appoint them like IAS, IFS etc? Via a commission? It is to see that judge is non-partisan, meritorious.
What a poor view you have
Let any of the godi channel heads MAAM NAVIKA JI, Mr arnab goswami, Mr ZAKA, Mr anand, Mr rajatsharma, Mr rahul kawal, maam anjana om rebut what Rtd justice of SC who has given a awesome speech, guys please listen carefully
A lecture in public domain on sensitive matters has little value...The retired judge was not in the panel of judges...so he is free to voice oponions but once is in hot seat of panel judges, the views become muted.
Terriffic lecture on Constitution by justice Rohinton Nariman. Hear it over and over again, and sharing with others interested in and concerned about constitution. 🎉🙏
Sir retirement of Supreme Court and high court should be raise to 70,/65
Indian Justice system folliw the will of goverment and on the other hand Pakistan two PM had been sacked from office by Supreeme court
Erudite speech
यदि नेहरू धारा 370 के लिए जिम्मेदार थे तो निश्चित रूप से नेहरू के कारण ही जम्मू कश्मीर भारत का हिस्सा बना...कृपया इसे न भूलें ",,....
You people are in the relam of constitution and then why and whom you are afraid of,,if. there is no law which means no use of courts. Look. at our ancestors they fought with British and attain. Freedom. for us. , But unfortunately. We are people with full of Fear
Thanks all of you for save india 🇮🇳 democrats 👍 from haijakars BJP
lol. Let’s shut down the Parliament and Executive wings of our government and vest all powers in kala coat gundas.
CJI ki value ek cabinate minister se kam ho gayee ye modi sah ne kar diya
Rehiew all his judgements.....some likely to be biased
India is described as a union of states and not a nation state in the constitution of India because each state is a defacto nation in its own right and not a province of a country.
In this arrangement, overly centralized rule means the political party representing the largest ethnic/linguistic/religious group will dominating the parliament and thereby states and political parties representing the ethnic/linguistic/religious minorities in the union of India.
This will lead to internal strife and tensions as we have been seeing in neighboring Pakistan with similar centralized rule dominated by one ethnic group.
The way forward is India to be a union of self governing states where only currency, communication, RBI, foreign affairs and defense are to be administered centrally by representatives of every state of the union and not by one political party representing the largest ethnic/linguistic/religious group in the union of India.
This is real cooperative and competitive federalism that Modi once spoke about but ended up doing just the opposite.
Come out of utopia. Do you even know how many variables are their in your context? There was and is a reason why constitution is tilted towards centre.
Constitution is as good as it's followers...listening to you one seems to be living in an emergency!
What ever be the provisions for checks and balances in the constitution the integrity of the people occupying the key positions in the judiciary and executive is the most important thing. The unfortunate recent development is that we do lack such people of high integrity in key positions.
We are in a critical stage of Indian democracy.
It is not fair to come to such a sweeping conclusion just because a decision goes against your expectations. The Govt tried to bring in transparency in the appointment of Judges by questioning the Collegium system. The Judges themselves who have formed a kind of legal Mafia resisted that clean up. Now the complaining against the Govt has started. Does Nariman have the guts to say that Collegium should be abolished. No he won't say that because he is also a part of this Mafia.
Such a bad argument on Kerala.