The sky voice does not sound like Scarlett Johansson. There are similarities, but Scarlet’s voice is deeper And more raspy. The sky voice is much more clearer and has a brighter tone . A human voice can’t be made that doesn’t sound somewhat like somebody on the planet
I hope that Scarlett Johansson can bring attention to other, less influential artists, like Sarah Andersen, having their intellectual property rights violated by AI companies.
They don't sound alike. Johansson has a distinctive rasp to Samantha's voice in her that is nonexistent in Openai's Sky voice. The tone is similar, but not the same. Maybe instead of a hissy fit, Scarlett could be flattered. If the Sky voice was indeed that of a voice actor, and not artificially generated, then what is the argument here? Does that voice actor's career end because Johansson thinks they sound alike? That's BS. Now Chat GPT freezes the best voice on the platform and paying subscribers lose out.
@@James-to7pi 1. Your networks changed the filter to make him look more orange. 2. Your guy is so incompetent that his DOJ won't charge him. You even have that justice who doesn't know what a woman is. But at least no mean tweets. 🤦
The trial itself is unimportant. Trump has successfully delayed it enough so that it will happen after the election, where one of two scenarios occurs. 1. Biden wins, the trial goes on. No matter what the verdict is, there are massive protests from one side, and Trump finds a way to avoid the worst punishment, like he always does. 2. Trump wins, pardons himself, every Dem (and probably a few Republicans) complain about the pardon, but Trump goes scot free. I personally believe pardoning oneself is despicable and can only lead to bad things, but it's constitutional, and therefore perfectly legal.
The 2nd part definitely sounded like Scarlet. I would need a better sound clip before I can say for sure on the 1st part. Regardless she definitely has a strong case even if they can match to 95% accuracy.
they dont sound alike to me at all really, other than them being both women voices, other than that, no real similarities
Sounds like a discount Scarlett to me.
I'm a fan of Scarlett and I don't hear it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Just a heads-up, if you are a voice talent and some company asks you if they can sample your voice, they 100% already did it lol
The sky voice does not sound like Scarlett Johansson. There are similarities, but Scarlet’s voice is deeper And more raspy. The sky voice is much more clearer and has a brighter tone . A human voice can’t be made that doesn’t sound somewhat like somebody on the planet
100%
"Without that body what's the point of listening?" - Colin Jost on SNL
👍 Michael Che made him say that line. 😂
Agreed!
After Disney, now she is after OpenAI even though that voice sounds more like Lake Bell than Ms Litigious herself.
AI copying people's voice is just going to be a part of our future. We are in the AI days of Napster.
I hope that Scarlett Johansson can bring attention to other, less influential artists, like Sarah Andersen, having their intellectual property rights violated by AI companies.
crazy af
They don't sound alike. Johansson has a distinctive rasp to Samantha's voice in her that is nonexistent in Openai's Sky voice. The tone is similar, but not the same. Maybe instead of a hissy fit, Scarlett could be flattered. If the Sky voice was indeed that of a voice actor, and not artificially generated, then what is the argument here? Does that voice actor's career end because Johansson thinks they sound alike? That's BS. Now Chat GPT freezes the best voice on the platform and paying subscribers lose out.
AI users are parasites. Why not pay real voice actors?
I don’t need to hear about Israel’s disgusting actions. Why didn’t you write that in the description if it’s first in the video? Smh.
They got to get that propaganda to you
They need that click...that view.....THAT SWEET SWEET MONEY!!!
booo
She just wants attention. Just say please
Meanwhile in important news: There's a banana republic trial underway in NY.
@@James-to7pi Yet the judge & "witnesses" are who most of us are mocking. That TDS is dangerous. You might want to get help.
@@James-to7pi Great job showing you don't know what TDS is.
@@James-to7pi 1. Your networks changed the filter to make him look more orange. 2. Your guy is so incompetent that his DOJ won't charge him. You even have that justice who doesn't know what a woman is. But at least no mean tweets. 🤦
The trial itself is unimportant.
Trump has successfully delayed it enough so that it will happen after the election, where one of two scenarios occurs.
1. Biden wins, the trial goes on. No matter what the verdict is, there are massive protests from one side, and Trump finds a way to avoid the worst punishment, like he always does.
2. Trump wins, pardons himself, every Dem (and probably a few Republicans) complain about the pardon, but Trump goes scot free.
I personally believe pardoning oneself is despicable and can only lead to bad things, but it's constitutional, and therefore perfectly legal.
@@vashmatrix5769 Color filter to look more orange?! 🤣 You're in a cult.
I guess this is modern RUclips. Promise them an AI video and shove footage of war crimes in their faces instead.
Need to hear a longer clip to judge if it resembles Johansson or not.
Who cares
The 2nd part definitely sounded like Scarlet. I would need a better sound clip before I can say for sure on the 1st part. Regardless she definitely has a strong case even if they can match to 95% accuracy.