Hi sabine. I know this comment is a bit out of context, but I need to hear some clear (or unclear if it's not known yet) answer. When people say quantum mechanics is "non local", isn't it a bit of a stretch? The bell and CHSH inequalities are based on (along with the """free will""" thing, but let's leave that aside) 2 statements: -locality, which means strictly the inability to change the state of B performing local operations on A -hidden variables, sometimes called realism: quantum variables are like the classical ones, they exist and have a definite value and describe the system, we just don't know them. This being said (correct me if I'm wrong), which of the hypothesis is wrong since the inequality are violated? My professor strongly asserted that surely the realism one is wrong, while the locality (in strict sense) is without a doubt conserved. But I found many books, as the Nielsen-Chuang, saying that those are both wrong. Are there any experimental proof that the locality (strictly) is violated? I can't find anything because of the fact that all papers refer to "non locality" as the whole thing, but I'm interested just in the specific aspect. Hope you'll answer, or make a video about it (even better)
@@queueceeyep. There are 10 kinds of people in the world.
Год назад+468
I believe “Einstein faster than light” meme has a simpler take. It jokes about a situation where one wouldn’t be able to photograph particles faster than light. It’s “pics or it didn’t happen”, a common and very old meme, put in a situation where there couldn’t possibly be pictures.
How to show the speed of a particle - or any moving object like a car - on a single photo? To ask for a proof of "something faster than c" by wording "pics or it didn't happen" is really so double-wrong here, and you don't need entanglement to explain why it is pretty funny.
Год назад+9
you are right. I think Sabine missed this one.... Her explanation on this one sounded weird to me.
I took a spin class to finally learn what spin is. The teaching method is a bit unconventional for a physics class but I’ve never been in better shape.
Seriously, some biologists (and physicists) are trying to invoke quantum effects in explaining consciousness, when no one can even define consciousness (except in medicine, where it means your response to outside stimuli; if you don't respond you're not conscious).
Photosynthesis is based on Quantum, it's well known for decades. Some bird most likely use a quantum process to navigate (other species use different techniques). I'm less convinced with the micro-tubules and consciousness theory, but there might be "something" in there, too.
@@kindlin True that the furthest we reach, the smallest the steps appear to be, despite the dream to have a theory of everything... Maybe it's just not possible, and as Jung (is supposed to have) said, science is only one of the multiple attitude of the mind?
In words like "apart" the leading 'a' is a prefix that means "not." Two parallel lines are forever apart. (Parallel lines are separated from each other.) Another example is moral versus amoral. It's a common mistake to omit the significant space between "a" and "part" when writing "a part" as if it were spelled "apart."
I learned quantum mechanics by marrying somebody who progressed through her PhD and wound up doing research in computational quantum chemistry. 20 years and I now know a decent amount of how much I don't know. Which is a pretty decent place to be, honestly. She had a "in memory" slide at an ACS conference earlier this year. I miss the heck out of sitting and just talking science and math with her.
Schrödinger's plates seem like an accurate picture of a deterministic version of QM. With enough information you know that the plates will break, but the "plate function" has them in a pre-collapse state.
And it's still possible to save those plates because they are not broken yet. But to find out the end result, you need to open it and make an attempt to save as many of them as possible.
I think the designer implied that the door was opaque, but that wouldn't work in the meme because we need to know there's something behind it. So the meme failed due to an inaccuracy driven by the limits of the medium.
@johngage5391 explains it quite nicely. If you think that the meme is inaccurate because you can see the plates, then you are only looking at the trees. I would also argue that you are intentionally and quite needlessly ignoring the fact that you also saw the forest.
12:50 Take note : there is a traffic sign, which forbids going to the left. It is just above the left pointing arrow on the road surface. Then there are also 2 blue traffic signs indicating one way traffic to the left. Totally confusing.
Also, the painted word LEFT would be centered, whereas RIGHT would be weirdly askew below TURN. Among the clues you gave, the inconsistent one is the "no left turn" sign. Closer inspection reveals that it is a temporary sign mounted on a folding barricade. That indicates to me that it, and presumably the errant "RIGHT" paint, were meant to be a somewhat temporary solution, probably due to road construction or utility work that is expected to last a few weeks to a few months.
Here in New Zealand our road markings are in thin, cheap paint and poorly maintained. So they turn invisible in the rain, which makes things even more quantumy.
I love this, because Sabine is brilliant, but very linear (as good scientists usually are) and exceptionally precise - which makes the memes HYSTERICAL
An electron is driving its car on a highway. It is stopped by the police. "Sir," says the policeman, "are you aware that you were driving 140km per hour?" "Well, thank you very much," replies the electron, "now I am lost."
@3:00 'Yes i have issues' - her deadpan delivery of her comedy is such gold. I just can't. Vielen Dank, Frau Hossenfelder für Ihre Arbeit! Es ist wahrhaft immer ein Vergnügen Ihnen zuzuhören.
I guess if Schrodinger's box was made of glass like the cabinet doors it would have ruined the surprise. Maybe once a year you could do a best physics memes special.
Schrödinger didn't make any sense with this example, the cat is an observer, and in the front row! He just hated cats, and chose this story to figuratively keep one in a box with poison gas for eternity. His daughter spilled the beans about this...
It's not about the observable physical state but about the usefullnes of the plate since they are still whole but will most likely be broken if you want to use them and therfpre can be considered as good as broken.
@@DR_1_1 He wasn't trying to make sense he was trying to say it was nonsense. But the multiple layers of observation is almost inescapable, since any measurement apparatus has layers before any indication gets to a human observer. Observation and measurement should never have been involved in the discussion, all that is required is an interaction or spontaneous event.
Sabine, I really appreciated your straightforward statement as to the salient points of Bell's Inequality. I have watched numerous documentaries on the topic that couldn't say anything definitive, even after 50 minutes of monologue.
OMG I❤U so much! It’s like you’re reading our minds when it comes to your choice of topics 💕 Superb vid but please don’t forget to take care of yourself 😅 YT is a harsh workplace. I member from your past vid that a 3 weeks holiday is good choice of duration but I will check it again, my curiosity is burning 🔥
For me it's paradoxically funny that the fact that a physicist comments on Physics memes, already gives all those memes a boost in funny. It's funny to hear somebody talking seriously about memes. Even more if the analyses assumes that teaching could have been a factor during the meme's craft. I don't Internet apart from Sabine, and few things, but the school bus is empty. I even assumed it's a crash test. Loved this episode
I’m not a physicist, but this video made me search about Bell’s theorem! So it is effective if you want it to be. Thank you Sabine, it was a great video as usual ❤️
The hidden variables meme is actually pretty good; I believe Sabine is prejudiced against it because she believes some modern "hidden variables" theories that don't actually involve local hidden variables.
I'm surprised you didn't take the L2 norm of those 3-vector ratings. I thought the Einstein "pics or it didn't happen" one was about the flawed neutrino result. UPDATE: The meme itself dates back to 2011 (the year of the neutrino controversy) according to an image search and appears on a page with an additional joke: “We don’t allow faster than light neutrinos in here” says the bartender. A neutrino walks into a bar.
I took the Einstein meme totally differently at first, much more literally: How would you even take a picture of something going faster than light? Relativity suggests FTL travel might be unachievable (I'm picking my words very carefully) so having Einstein make a skeptical and somewhat sarcastic remark about it makes enough sense for the joke to work. The fact that it's actually accurate but in a completely different (and probably unintentional) way is a delicious irony, and funny in its own right.
This double stripe occurs when you measure which slit a photon passed through which is the observer effect. That's what the meme is getting at, the monkey is the "observer" which equates to the measuring device which is doing the "observing".
Hidden geology joke? I’ll give it a three on effectiveness and a 4 on humor. On accuracy, I have to give it a 9 and a one at the same time. It’s Schrödinger’s geology joke.
Sabine cutting through (group think) like a pro. We have to stop following the lead of random internet snarky commenters and think for ourselves. Thank you, Sabine!
@@batesestabrooks3774 *"I'm not sure I understand what you're saying about Keith Richards, but any reference to him is, ipso facto, funny."* ... He is arguably both "alive and dead" at the same time.
you are my favorite content creator. i don't understand most of the stuff, but it somehow gives me great comfort knowing there are people out there who have some kind of idea on what and why 😊 please never stop, sabine.
Loved this vídeo! Please do more!! And it'd be great to hear from you more on the atom spin, I'm an economist, not a physicist, and this concept has been a little bit hard to grasp. Your vídeos sparked my curiosity and I've been learning a Lot with You ❤
My impression, based on the graphic shown, is that it may be more akin to the direction of a circular wobble. Imagine rolling your wrists "inward" or "outward" while keeping your thumb pointing the same direction at all times. There is definitely some sort of chirality of circuloid motion, but nothing is strictly "spinning" nor is anything being imparted with angular momentum. I think "spin" is a deliberately oversimplified way of naming a thing so that physicists and chemists will know the property you mean without inventing a more cumbersome though accurate term.
Hi, I love your broadcast 🤗 Nevertheless, in one case, that with these plates (Schrödinger's cat), I do find it very funny and I think, that the basic idea is being shown correctly. Of course, because I am not a scientist, and had only one semester quantum-mechanics in an engeneering class, I try to explain my view in a very unsophisicated way. Why do I like that meme: the actual view is not after the experiment was performed, either it is not the state before starting the experiment. If you ask the following question: will ever anyone open the door of this cupboard? Then you have the same uncertaintity as having an atom which will decay at an unknown point of time. This state seems to me as being both, as long as no one opens the door. We already know that if we wait very long someone has to open the door (for the cat, the same situation, if you wait too long, the cat will die because of getting old). At that moment your experiment will be executed. Of cours, You are right about the glass door showing the state, but the strange feeling of the tradegy (😁 ) which is about to happen after the door opens, and the current stable state, where no tradegy yet happened, gives exactly that strange feeling of having multiple solutions at the same moment. And this seems to me the correct interpretation of the wave-function, before collapsing. 😁 Hopefully did't get it too wrong?
I think you kind of missed the joke in some of the memes. On the Einstein one, the joke is that he's asking for _pictures_ of something that moves faster than light (and therefore can't be photographed), so he's looking smug because he wins either way. More broadly, you could say it's a comment on scientific empiricism and epistemology, along the lines of the famous "tree falling in the forest" question (often attributed to Berkeley). Can we only believe things that we have direct evidence of? Forget sound; if a tree falls in the forest and one doesn't "observe" it (meaning no _irrefutable_ record of that fall can be obtained), can it even be said to have _fallen_ at all? But really, I'd say it's just a joke about taking "pics" of something going faster than light. On the boyfriend one, I think the joke is indeed about the many-worlds interpretation. So it's not about other states _disappearing,_ it's about all other states getting mad because you didn't observe them, and therefore they don't get to be a part of your "special" universe.
@@paulgoogol2652 - I tried to use a curved-beam flash but the photos kept getting polarised along the time axis. Then I tried to use a tachyonic flash, and... let's just say I still have flashbacks.
As someone who at age four objected strenuously to the Goldilocks story because obviously the large bowl of porridge would be the hottest, the small bowl would actually be the coldest, and the mid-sized bowl would be the "just right" temperature - contrary to the story which magically made the small bowl defeat thermodynamics. I didn't know about thermodynamics at age four, but I did understand enough about size and cooling to be outraged by the duplicity of the author. So, of course, I absolutely adore your take-down of pseudo-quantum-related memes. Thanks so much!
Well, only if they all started at the same temperature! Perhaps Baby Bear's porridge was poured from the original large pot of porridge at a later time. Perhaps because Baby Bear woke up later. Also air currents could be a factor, perhaps Mama Bear's porridge happened to be sitting right by an open window, and so cooled much faster than Baby Bear's.
I am awfully sorry, but I actually enjoyed this video. Terribly sorry for failing your expectations ;) Thank you! On the nerd side of things: 10 most popular by what statistics?
Sabine- what a bit of humor😂🎯🧑🏾🏫 Im sad that both the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor and the Nobel do not (yet) include an international physics humor subcategory. Have a cup of coffee. Brilliant
Sabine saying she's not funny in this video = Sabine being funny in this video. Pretty sure that's gotta be a law of physics, too, dunnit? Still, I loved it, and MUST leave a like and comment for the care and feeding of the Almighty Algorithm!
The "Schrödinger's Plates" one would be more accurate (albeit cryptic) if the door were opaque. In fact, I think if Magritte were alive today, he'd probably be inspired to make a simple painting of a wooden cupboard and title it "Schrödinger's Plates".
6:45 not sure she got the joke. Yes, you can "see" the plates are not broken but the measurement only takes place when you open the door which is when you actually "see" what happens.
Love your version of the train one. No, train accidents are not funny, but it is still a good example of my answer for many quantum discussions (reality wins). Not a scientist, not sponsored by one. LOL.
Thanks a bunch, Sabine! 😂 About the puppet monkey, isn't it about the experiment with or without a detector (to observe what the heck happens at the slits)? 🤔 Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
This video comes with a quiz! You can take it here: quizwithit.com/start_thequiz/1698551295283x991929444055077900
Hi sabine. I know this comment is a bit out of context, but I need to hear some clear (or unclear if it's not known yet) answer.
When people say quantum mechanics is "non local", isn't it a bit of a stretch? The bell and CHSH inequalities are based on (along with the """free will""" thing, but let's leave that aside) 2 statements:
-locality, which means strictly the inability to change the state of B performing local operations on A
-hidden variables, sometimes called realism: quantum variables are like the classical ones, they exist and have a definite value and describe the system, we just don't know them.
This being said (correct me if I'm wrong), which of the hypothesis is wrong since the inequality are violated? My professor strongly asserted that surely the realism one is wrong, while the locality (in strict sense) is without a doubt conserved. But I found many books, as the Nielsen-Chuang, saying that those are both wrong. Are there any experimental proof that the locality (strictly) is violated? I can't find anything because of the fact that all papers refer to "non locality" as the whole thing, but I'm interested just in the specific aspect.
Hope you'll answer, or make a video about it (even better)
Dude (tte), you are not taking the Planck hair meme away from civilization!!!
Could you discribe each and every galaxy as maybe a universe?
Sabine? Can't you look into infinity?
You don't even the double slit...
Leave it to a German person to rate jokes on a scientific three-dimension scale ;)
I found this whole video so hilarious. Sabine's attempt at killing the fun in the memes is so funny
That’s what I thought. Could suck the fun out of a bouncy castle.
Well, it takes anoutsde observer ... ;)
Fun-Fact: Sabine is a German person.
You mean an autistic Person 😂
The funniest thing in this video is how seriously Sabine took it. Comedy gold.
Typical German humor. Most people don't get it, except nerds on youtube maybe.
@@DR_1_1yeah. Nicest humor is just about a toilet buba-gaga giggles and etc. i guess...
@@DR_1_1 German humour is very serious. It's no laughing matter.
Quantum Meme : Sabine is both being funny and unfunny at the same time.
She had a GRADING RUBRIC. Just... yes.
I give you a 10 for accuracy
That wave function collapsed as soon as she said "shit".
@@LuisSierra42that's a 2 in binary.
@@queueceeyep. There are 10 kinds of people in the world.
I believe “Einstein faster than light” meme has a simpler take. It jokes about a situation where one wouldn’t be able to photograph particles faster than light. It’s “pics or it didn’t happen”, a common and very old meme, put in a situation where there couldn’t possibly be pictures.
I thought the exact same thing. Pics are made with light that has bounced off of objects
Yes, surely this meme is about relativity, not quantum physics!
How to show the speed of a particle - or any moving object like a car - on a single photo? To ask for a proof of "something faster than c" by wording "pics or it didn't happen" is really so double-wrong here, and you don't need entanglement to explain why it is pretty funny.
you are right. I think Sabine missed this one.... Her explanation on this one sounded weird to me.
@@andreaspoppe5176 "pics" is plural, is it not?
I took a spin class to finally learn what spin is. The teaching method is a bit unconventional for a physics class but I’ve never been in better shape.
Don't lose too much weight though, or you might have some trouble finding the class.
So, you're a sphere, but...not?
People who get a PhD working on spin are spin doctors.
"the girlfriend will be outraged in any possible universe" is Sabine making the meme funnier than it was
Sabine casually throwing shade at biology got me wheezing
Seriously, some biologists (and physicists) are trying to invoke quantum effects in explaining consciousness, when no one can even define consciousness (except in medicine, where it means your response to outside stimuli; if you don't respond you're not conscious).
Photosynthesis is based on Quantum, it's well known for decades. Some bird most likely use a quantum process to navigate (other species use different techniques).
I'm less convinced with the micro-tubules and consciousness theory, but there might be "something" in there, too.
@@DR_1_1 Right, there are some solid examples to pull from. but they are few and far between. But QM is tried to be invoked for EVERYTHING lol
@@kindlin True that the furthest we reach, the smallest the steps appear to be, despite the dream to have a theory of everything...
Maybe it's just not possible, and as Jung (is supposed to have) said, science is only one of the multiple attitude of the mind?
@@ralphacosta4726That is because standards in universities are incredibly low and hopefully many of these useless desk dwellers are replaced by AI 🤣
Sabine, I never thought of you as a reactionary. But I'll give you 10/10/10 for nerdy, funny, educational.
shes not a reactionary, just an autistic liberal
Guess you didn't see her video on capitalism lol
@@piemaster310never gonna forget her hypocrisy on "sticking to one's field" on that one
@@piemaster310 blabla, can't forget a single mistake? Hope you have the same strength about yourself
Either I'm missing a joke or you should look up what "reactionary" means :-P
I’ve always said that Germans take their humour VERY seriously
Maybe you missed an aspect: Taking humor VERY seriously is an additional kind of humor.
German humor is serious business.
🤣🤣🤣
As a result, they did extensive real-life experiments with genocide jokes in the mid-century, with mixed results.
Humor is a serious matter
Didn't think this was going to be THAT interesting but gave it a shot and really glad I did. You never disappoint.
Never thought I'd find the vivisection of jokes to be itself so hilarious. It's like what the kids call meta humor, I guess. Bravo, Sabine!
10 on accuracy. 10 on informative. And 10 on funny. Thanks Sabine, for another great video!
Damn. Now Sabine is giving us lectures on nerdiness. And she nails it, of course.
Your comments were _way_ funnier than the memes themselves. Well done, dr. Hossenfelder!
Reactions are a part of science!
a part of.. or apart from.
@@thearmchairspacemanOG: In this case, the "a" is superfluous: "Reactions are part of science."
@@brothermine2292 correct.. .. yes..
In words like "apart" the leading 'a' is a prefix that means "not." Two parallel lines are forever apart. (Parallel lines are separated from each other.) Another example is moral versus amoral.
It's a common mistake to omit the significant space between "a" and "part" when writing "a part" as if it were spelled "apart."
@@brothermine2292 bollocks, USA. you haven't a damned clue how the Invaders tongue works... the prefix for ''not'' is Ae.
I learned quantum mechanics by marrying somebody who progressed through her PhD and wound up doing research in computational quantum chemistry. 20 years and I now know a decent amount of how much I don't know. Which is a pretty decent place to be, honestly. She had a "in memory" slide at an ACS conference earlier this year. I miss the heck out of sitting and just talking science and math with her.
Schrödinger's plates seem like an accurate picture of a deterministic version of QM. With enough information you know that the plates will break, but the "plate function" has them in a pre-collapse state.
…but, you *can* see inside the box, which makes it a poor representation, riiiight?
And it's still possible to save those plates because they are not broken yet. But to find out the end result, you need to open it and make an attempt to save as many of them as possible.
I think the designer implied that the door was opaque, but that wouldn't work in the meme because we need to know there's something behind it. So the meme failed due to an inaccuracy driven by the limits of the medium.
2 for accuracy, 8 for explains how a deterministic QM would look if someone could look at it which they can't.@@petertomshany
@johngage5391 explains it quite nicely. If you think that the meme is inaccurate because you can see the plates, then you are only looking at the trees. I would also argue that you are intentionally and quite needlessly ignoring the fact that you also saw the forest.
12:50
Take note : there is a traffic sign, which forbids going to the left.
It is just above the left pointing arrow on the road surface.
Then there are also 2 blue traffic signs indicating one way traffic to the left.
Totally confusing.
Also, the painted word LEFT would be centered, whereas RIGHT would be weirdly askew below TURN.
Among the clues you gave, the inconsistent one is the "no left turn" sign. Closer inspection reveals that it is a temporary sign mounted on a folding barricade. That indicates to me that it, and presumably the errant "RIGHT" paint, were meant to be a somewhat temporary solution, probably due to road construction or utility work that is expected to last a few weeks to a few months.
Here in New Zealand our road markings are in thin, cheap paint and poorly maintained. So they turn invisible in the rain, which makes things even more quantumy.
I love this, because Sabine is brilliant, but very linear (as good scientists usually are) and exceptionally precise - which makes the memes HYSTERICAL
0:50 "So, we'll be nerding all over the place, to-day." Aaaaand I just lost No Nerd November.
9:45 Sabina throwing shade at Matt O'Dowd
An electron is driving its car on a highway. It is stopped by the police. "Sir," says the policeman, "are you aware that you were driving 140km per hour?" "Well, thank you very much," replies the electron, "now I am lost."
Clever 😊
After watching this I think I went into a Quantum State, I both yawned and laughed at the same time, that was absolutely terrifying.
This video is a 10/10/10!
And thank you for pointing out that a one slit experiment produces a interference pattern too, damnit!
This is definitely on the list of things I didn't know I needed until I got it, thank you Sabine 😁
At 5:46 is an extremely good illustration of Schrödinger´s principle = cat!
Just saw a meme yesterday that had a cat that chewed its way out of a box that said 'tell Schrodinger I'm alive.' Got a good laugh from it.
@3:00 'Yes i have issues' - her deadpan delivery of her comedy is such gold. I just can't. Vielen Dank, Frau Hossenfelder für Ihre Arbeit! Es ist wahrhaft immer ein Vergnügen Ihnen zuzuhören.
I guess if Schrodinger's box was made of glass like the cabinet doors it would have ruined the surprise. Maybe once a year you could do a best physics memes special.
I gave it a 10 for funny, because I could visualize Schrödinger looking at it and visualizing his uncertainty.
Schrödinger didn't make any sense with this example, the cat is an observer, and in the front row!
He just hated cats, and chose this story to figuratively keep one in a box with poison gas for eternity.
His daughter spilled the beans about this...
It's not about the observable physical state but about the usefullnes of the plate since they are still whole but will most likely be broken if you want to use them and therfpre can be considered as good as broken.
@@DR_1_1 He wasn't trying to make sense he was trying to say it was nonsense. But the multiple layers of observation is almost inescapable, since any measurement apparatus has layers before any indication gets to a human observer. Observation and measurement should never have been involved in the discussion, all that is required is an interaction or spontaneous event.
@@crawkn Agree with your first 2 points/sentences, but I think you don't get the 3rd correctly... or you are just rejecting Quantum.
Loved her take on the electron spin. I laughed out loud. "Physicists really say shit like that."
#METOO !
I genuinely laughed a few times during this. As a chemist who routinely has to work with electron spin...
Fortunately, not a biologist. 😂😊
Though I shouldn't joke about it: I am an economist! Not even a real science..😂😂😂
Sabine, I really appreciated your straightforward statement as to the salient points of Bell's Inequality. I have watched numerous documentaries on the topic that couldn't say anything definitive, even after 50 minutes of monologue.
Is there a meme out there which Sabine would consider a triple 10? Seems like an impossible task.
More of an uncertain task - you could only know 1 value with any accuracy.
8:30 It's funny how nowadays every magic plot device is "quantum" when in 50s sci-fi like Foundation it was atomic.
I did a double slit experiment once. Was epic, but it wasn’t cheap.
OMG I❤U so much! It’s like you’re reading our minds when it comes to your choice of topics 💕 Superb vid but please don’t forget to take care of yourself 😅 YT is a harsh workplace. I member from your past vid that a 3 weeks holiday is good choice of duration but I will check it again, my curiosity is burning 🔥
This video was a 10 on funniness, a 10 on accuracy and a 10 on effectiveness
For me it's paradoxically funny that the fact that a physicist comments on Physics memes, already gives all those memes a boost in funny. It's funny to hear somebody talking seriously about memes. Even more if the analyses assumes that teaching could have been a factor during the meme's craft.
I don't Internet apart from Sabine, and few things, but the school bus is empty. I even assumed it's a crash test.
Loved this episode
I’m not a physicist, but this video made me search about Bell’s theorem! So it is effective if you want it to be.
Thank you Sabine, it was a great video as usual ❤️
The hidden variables meme is actually pretty good; I believe Sabine is prejudiced against it because she believes some modern "hidden variables" theories that don't actually involve local hidden variables.
My favorite quantum meme is the "Help Desk" one you had on one of your videos. Hilarious!
Excellent visual contrast wonderful content 👍 love your channel 👏👏👀
I'm surprised you didn't take the L2 norm of those 3-vector ratings.
I thought the Einstein "pics or it didn't happen" one was about the flawed neutrino result.
UPDATE: The meme itself dates back to 2011 (the year of the neutrino controversy) according to an image search and appears on a page with an additional joke:
“We don’t allow faster than light neutrinos in here” says the bartender.
A neutrino walks into a bar.
The video I didn’t know I needed!
Finally, science *with* the gobbledygook.
Love it. Sabine would be fun to have tea with
I took the Einstein meme totally differently at first, much more literally: How would you even take a picture of something going faster than light? Relativity suggests FTL travel might be unachievable (I'm picking my words very carefully) so having Einstein make a skeptical and somewhat sarcastic remark about it makes enough sense for the joke to work.
The fact that it's actually accurate but in a completely different (and probably unintentional) way is a delicious irony, and funny in its own right.
This double stripe occurs when you measure which slit a photon passed through which is the observer effect. That's what the meme is getting at, the monkey is the "observer" which equates to the measuring device which is doing the "observing".
Sabine, you're beyond awesome, as usual, 10/10/10.
Dear Sabine, if I can I would like to give a rating to your video. Accuracy 10, effectiveness 10 and fun 11. Thanks for everything
Science rocks - and so does Sabine
Hidden geology joke? I’ll give it a three on effectiveness and a 4 on humor. On accuracy, I have to give it a 9 and a one at the same time. It’s Schrödinger’s geology joke.
Oh boy. Can't wait for the response from PBS Dr Matt on the double slit diss.
Great idea for a video! It’s fun and educational at the same time.
I thought the Einstein meme was about the purported discovery that neutrinos could travel faster than the speed of light
Sabine cutting through (group think) like a pro. We have to stop following the lead of random internet snarky commenters and think for ourselves. Thank you, Sabine!
4:23 Oberservation doesn't play a role, it's the measurement. No observer needed.
I think Keith Richards is a better example of the measurement update problem than Schrödinger's Cat.
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying about Keith Richards, but any reference to him is, ipso facto, funny.😂
@@batesestabrooks3774 *"I'm not sure I understand what you're saying about Keith Richards, but any reference to him is, ipso facto, funny."*
... He is arguably both "alive and dead" at the same time.
you are my favorite content creator. i don't understand most of the stuff, but it somehow gives me great comfort knowing there are people out there who have some kind of idea on what and why 😊
please never stop, sabine.
This made me actually chuckle aloud multiple times Sabine has such a German sense of humor.
Picture of Schroedinger's dumpster - painted on the side is "empty when full".
Loved this vídeo! Please do more!! And it'd be great to hear from you more on the atom spin, I'm an economist, not a physicist, and this concept has been a little bit hard to grasp. Your vídeos sparked my curiosity and I've been learning a Lot with You ❤
My impression, based on the graphic shown, is that it may be more akin to the direction of a circular wobble. Imagine rolling your wrists "inward" or "outward" while keeping your thumb pointing the same direction at all times. There is definitely some sort of chirality of circuloid motion, but nothing is strictly "spinning" nor is anything being imparted with angular momentum.
I think "spin" is a deliberately oversimplified way of naming a thing so that physicists and chemists will know the property you mean without inventing a more cumbersome though accurate term.
Found your video "suitably unfunny", yet highly accurate and effective! 🙏😎🇩🇪
Bonjour. Un neutrino entre dans un bar : "je ne fais que passer !" !
_"Because physicists really say shit like that."_
I'll give that a 10 for accuracy, 9 for funniness, and 3 for informativeness. 😛
Hi, I love your broadcast 🤗 Nevertheless, in one case, that with these plates (Schrödinger's cat), I do find it very funny and I think, that the basic idea is being shown correctly. Of course, because I am not a scientist, and had only one semester quantum-mechanics in an engeneering class, I try to explain my view in a very unsophisicated way. Why do I like that meme: the actual view is not after the experiment was performed, either it is not the state before starting the experiment. If you ask the following question: will ever anyone open the door of this cupboard? Then you have the same uncertaintity as having an atom which will decay at an unknown point of time. This state seems to me as being both, as long as no one opens the door. We already know that if we wait very long someone has to open the door (for the cat, the same situation, if you wait too long, the cat will die because of getting old). At that moment your experiment will be executed.
Of cours, You are right about the glass door showing the state, but the strange feeling of the tradegy (😁 ) which is about to happen after the door opens, and the current stable state, where no tradegy yet happened, gives exactly that strange feeling of having multiple solutions at the same moment. And this seems to me the correct interpretation of the wave-function, before collapsing.
😁 Hopefully did't get it too wrong?
I can't wait to find out whether I did or didn't watch that video.
I think you kind of missed the joke in some of the memes.
On the Einstein one, the joke is that he's asking for _pictures_ of something that moves faster than light (and therefore can't be photographed), so he's looking smug because he wins either way.
More broadly, you could say it's a comment on scientific empiricism and epistemology, along the lines of the famous "tree falling in the forest" question (often attributed to Berkeley). Can we only believe things that we have direct evidence of? Forget sound; if a tree falls in the forest and one doesn't "observe" it (meaning no _irrefutable_ record of that fall can be obtained), can it even be said to have _fallen_ at all? But really, I'd say it's just a joke about taking "pics" of something going faster than light.
On the boyfriend one, I think the joke is indeed about the many-worlds interpretation. So it's not about other states _disappearing,_ it's about all other states getting mad because you didn't observe them, and therefore they don't get to be a part of your "special" universe.
So all faster than light objects have to move away from all observers? Pretty one-dimensional thinking.
@@paulgoogol2652 - I tried to use a curved-beam flash but the photos kept getting polarised along the time axis. Then I tried to use a tachyonic flash, and... let's just say I still have flashbacks.
The school bus is completely empty! Must be at least a 3 on the funny scale.
I can't believe you said it wouldn't be funny, I've been chuckling along the whole way, funny, entertaining and educational!
That's because it was funny and not funny at the same time, but you didn't know til you laughed 😂
@@ferd1775 Heinsenberg's fun uncertainty principle
@@LuisSierra42 should have wrote it as fun-certainty
As someone who at age four objected strenuously to the Goldilocks story because obviously the large bowl of porridge would be the hottest, the small bowl would actually be the coldest, and the mid-sized bowl would be the "just right" temperature - contrary to the story which magically made the small bowl defeat thermodynamics. I didn't know about thermodynamics at age four, but I did understand enough about size and cooling to be outraged by the duplicity of the author. So, of course, I absolutely adore your take-down of pseudo-quantum-related memes. Thanks so much!
Well, only if they all started at the same temperature! Perhaps Baby Bear's porridge was poured from the original large pot of porridge at a later time. Perhaps because Baby Bear woke up later. Also air currents could be a factor, perhaps Mama Bear's porridge happened to be sitting right by an open window, and so cooled much faster than Baby Bear's.
😂 love this, more please.
1:24
Captioning it "on his way to discover quantum physics" is a funnier caption.
The double-slit experiment acquires a whole new layer of meaning if you use one of Gwyneth Paltrow's candles as the light source.
Hmm, do both slits smell?
The guy who fixed my car was tiny. Was he a quantum mechanic?
Sabine is a queen of QM, ten points in all the three categotires for this video🙃
Without Quantum Mechanics, we would not have, iPhone, computers and anything related to them.
Hilarious! 10/10 for pedantry
I think this is more like a meme review rather than a reaction video, and I think that's great. Would love to see more of this type of content :)
Finally, a review paper pn RUclips.
I am awfully sorry, but I actually enjoyed this video. Terribly sorry for failing your expectations ;)
Thank you!
On the nerd side of things: 10 most popular by what statistics?
after 90 years in the box, I'm certain the cat is dead.
Yep, no one let it out in solving the measurement problem. Best candidate for that: Dr. Sabine
Sabine- what a bit of humor😂🎯🧑🏾🏫
Im sad that both the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor and the Nobel do not (yet) include an international physics humor subcategory. Have a cup of coffee. Brilliant
Loved the video!
No matter what Sabine's video is about, she can't help but teach. Another enjoyable video!
This is the most Sabine video
We now desperately need memes with Sabine, they'd be totally sick.
Sabine saying she's not funny in this video = Sabine being funny in this video. Pretty sure that's gotta be a law of physics, too, dunnit?
Still, I loved it, and MUST leave a like and comment for the care and feeding of the Almighty Algorithm!
The "Schrödinger's Plates" one would be more accurate (albeit cryptic) if the door were opaque. In fact, I think if Magritte were alive today, he'd probably be inspired to make a simple painting of a wooden cupboard and title it "Schrödinger's Plates".
Or even Ceci n'est pas ... 😝
@@rnilsson8063 ... un chat?
You're mistaken Sabine. This is the funniest quantum physics video I've ever seen.
Memes are both funny and not until Sabine observes it
Sabine, you are truly a global treasure. Whole vid was amazing, and I thought your ratings were very accurate!
The funniest part is when Sabine says this Meme reaction video comes with a quiz including references! 😂
13:32 "I think that's how quantum paint works indeed!" haha
I *LOVE* your sense of humour, Sabine! Thank you for the video!
There's a meme of a cat that looks like a gangster -- eye patch, unshaven, smoking, with the caption, "Tell Shrodinger I not dead."
If there were a Nobel for Critical thinking Sabine would likely win it and discover new paradoxes through analysis of her "win".
6:45 not sure she got the joke. Yes, you can "see" the plates are not broken but the measurement only takes place when you open the door which is when you actually "see" what happens.
Love your version of the train one. No, train accidents are not funny, but it is still a good example of my answer for many quantum discussions (reality wins). Not a scientist, not sponsored by one. LOL.
I lost it at the Schrodinger plates. That's hilarious.
Thanks a bunch, Sabine! 😂
About the puppet monkey, isn't it about the experiment with or without a detector (to observe what the heck happens at the slits)? 🤔
Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
"not everthing with butter and flies produces butterflies"🦋😂