You haven't hit the crux of any of these matters you've posted. Dr. Omaisan till this day hasn't made a bayaan clarifying his tweets in support of Muhammad Isa or even his lavish praises of Ikhwanis like 'Umaad Zuhayr. You clearly don't know Dr. Omaisan well enough to know that his level of English is good enough for him to not have a translator, are you not aware that he even graduated high school in the US?? Also, I'm pretty sure you're not aware of the slander he made against Sh Ubayd as well, but then again you probably hold the same view. Sh Rabee didn't say he deviated severly for no reason. Once you know the reality of this man, Sh Rabee and Sh Ubayd were spot on about him. Ask anyone in Madeenah that's close to Sh Rabee and Sh Ubayd and you'll know what their view was and still is of Dr. Omaisan, no matter how many general praises he receives. May Allaah guide us and him.
@@palestinianmaytr48 "haven't hit the crux of any of these matters," if you believe that I did not explain Shaykh ʻAbd Al-Raḥmān al-ʻUmaysān not taking a stance against Shaykh Muḥammad ibn Hādī properly, then I cannot force you to think different, as I provided the speech of Shaykh ʻAbd Al-Raḥmān Muḥiyy al-Dīn in this issue. Also, the double-standards of Spubs and Co., in not warning against Shamsi for not retracting his false defence of Muḥammad al-ʻĪsā. Are you with Spubs and Co., or not? "made a bayaan clarifying his tweets in support of Muhammad Isa," how do you know Dr. ʻAbd Al-Raḥmān al-ʻUmaysān knows the condition of Muḥammad al-ʻĪsā? Muḥammad al-ʻĪsā was falsely approved by KSA hence many Scholars were not aware of his true condition and many are still to be advised properly. There are more bigger mistakes the Muftī has fallen into regarding this issue and what surrounds it, however you are silent on him. "'Umaad Zuhayr," I do not know who he is, but the same steps would apply just like on Muḥammad al-ʻĪsā. "his level of English is good enough for him to not have a translator," what is wrong with al-ʻUmaysān having a translator? Who warned against this action from the Major Scholars? "slander he made against Sh Ubayd," this is the same person you claimed in the previous video of mine about one of his last speeches, that he aided the Ṣaʻāfiqah and slandered Shaykh Muḥammad ibn Hādī and Shaykh Usāmah al-ʻUtaybī upon knowledge, yet you are using the Ṣaʻāfiqah's rhetoric against al-ʻUmaysān. Are you with Spubs and Co., or not? Recently, Shaykh Usāmah al-ʻUtaybī himself said that the likes of ʻArafāt, ʻAbd Allāh al-Bukhārī, etc., deceived Shaykh ʻUbayd al-Jābirī to warn against him. "Sh Rabee and Sh Ubayd were spot on about him," the only thing I understand about their warning is that al-ʻUmaysān is the head of the Muṣaʻfiqah, i.e., the followers of Shaykh Muḥammad ibn Hādī, who you also called al-ʻAllāmah in the other video of mine about Shaykh ʻUbayd's passing away (referenced in the paragraph before this one), so if you are with Shaykh Muḥammad ibn Hādī and Shaykh Usāmah al-ʻUtaybī, then those 2 Shuyūkh also warn against you, according to you, "spot on about" you. Are you with Spubs and Co., or not? "Ask anyone in Madeenah that's close to Sh Rabee and Sh Ubayd," although I'll ignore the factual error in this statement, the only people "close" to Sh Rabee are the ones you called Ṣaʻāfiqah in that same video you commented on my channel which I have referenced in the previous 2 paragraphs. "Sh Ubayd," how are you now referencing him when you accused him of slandering Shaykh Muḥammad ibn Hādī and Shaykh Usāmah al-ʻUtaybī on purpose?
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
jazakAllah khair brother may Allah protect you and increase you and us all in knowledge
@@rohail-saqib ʼĀmīn waʼiyyāk.
You haven't hit the crux of any of these matters you've posted. Dr. Omaisan till this day hasn't made a bayaan clarifying his tweets in support of Muhammad Isa or even his lavish praises of Ikhwanis like 'Umaad Zuhayr. You clearly don't know Dr. Omaisan well enough to know that his level of English is good enough for him to not have a translator, are you not aware that he even graduated high school in the US?? Also, I'm pretty sure you're not aware of the slander he made against Sh Ubayd as well, but then again you probably hold the same view. Sh Rabee didn't say he deviated severly for no reason. Once you know the reality of this man, Sh Rabee and Sh Ubayd were spot on about him. Ask anyone in Madeenah that's close to Sh Rabee and Sh Ubayd and you'll know what their view was and still is of Dr. Omaisan, no matter how many general praises he receives. May Allaah guide us and him.
@@palestinianmaytr48 "haven't hit the crux of any of these matters," if you believe that I did not explain Shaykh ʻAbd Al-Raḥmān al-ʻUmaysān not taking a stance against Shaykh Muḥammad ibn Hādī properly, then I cannot force you to think different, as I provided the speech of Shaykh ʻAbd Al-Raḥmān Muḥiyy al-Dīn in this issue. Also, the double-standards of Spubs and Co., in not warning against Shamsi for not retracting his false defence of Muḥammad al-ʻĪsā. Are you with Spubs and Co., or not?
"made a bayaan clarifying his tweets in support of Muhammad Isa," how do you know Dr. ʻAbd Al-Raḥmān al-ʻUmaysān knows the condition of Muḥammad al-ʻĪsā? Muḥammad al-ʻĪsā was falsely approved by KSA hence many Scholars were not aware of his true condition and many are still to be advised properly. There are more bigger mistakes the Muftī has fallen into regarding this issue and what surrounds it, however you are silent on him.
"'Umaad Zuhayr," I do not know who he is, but the same steps would apply just like on Muḥammad al-ʻĪsā.
"his level of English is good enough for him to not have a translator," what is wrong with al-ʻUmaysān having a translator? Who warned against this action from the Major Scholars?
"slander he made against Sh Ubayd," this is the same person you claimed in the previous video of mine about one of his last speeches, that he aided the Ṣaʻāfiqah and slandered Shaykh Muḥammad ibn Hādī and Shaykh Usāmah al-ʻUtaybī upon knowledge, yet you are using the Ṣaʻāfiqah's rhetoric against al-ʻUmaysān. Are you with Spubs and Co., or not? Recently, Shaykh Usāmah al-ʻUtaybī himself said that the likes of ʻArafāt, ʻAbd Allāh al-Bukhārī, etc., deceived Shaykh ʻUbayd al-Jābirī to warn against him.
"Sh Rabee and Sh Ubayd were spot on about him," the only thing I understand about their warning is that al-ʻUmaysān is the head of the Muṣaʻfiqah, i.e., the followers of Shaykh Muḥammad ibn Hādī, who you also called al-ʻAllāmah in the other video of mine about Shaykh ʻUbayd's passing away (referenced in the paragraph before this one), so if you are with Shaykh Muḥammad ibn Hādī and Shaykh Usāmah al-ʻUtaybī, then those 2 Shuyūkh also warn against you, according to you, "spot on about" you. Are you with Spubs and Co., or not?
"Ask anyone in Madeenah that's close to Sh Rabee and Sh Ubayd," although I'll ignore the factual error in this statement, the only people "close" to Sh Rabee are the ones you called Ṣaʻāfiqah in that same video you commented on my channel which I have referenced in the previous 2 paragraphs. "Sh Ubayd," how are you now referencing him when you accused him of slandering Shaykh Muḥammad ibn Hādī and Shaykh Usāmah al-ʻUtaybī on purpose?